Open Innovation Forum & Museum of Moscow in Russia 29Oct2015 & 31Oct2015 Dr Igor Calzada MBA Univ Oxford Future of Cities.ppt
ā¢
4 gostaramā¢1,682 visualizaƧƵes
Dr Calzada took part in the panel 'The city as a technology consumer. Vision 2030' in the programme of the Open Innovation Forum 2015 in Moscow (Russia) by presenting this '10 Provocations to Design Strategies of our (Smart) Cities' and quoting the journal article 'Unplugging: Deconstructing the Smart Cities' via Journal of Urban Technology. This presentation is a full version of the presentation he delivered two days later in the Museum of Moscow in front of an wide entrepreneurial audience.
Recomendados
Recomendados
Mais conteĆŗdo relacionado
Semelhante a Open Innovation Forum & Museum of Moscow in Russia 29Oct2015 & 31Oct2015 Dr Igor Calzada MBA Univ Oxford Future of Cities.ppt
Semelhante a Open Innovation Forum & Museum of Moscow in Russia 29Oct2015 & 31Oct2015 Dr Igor Calzada MBA Univ Oxford Future of Cities.ppt (20)
Mais de Dr Igor Calzada, MBA, FeRSA
Mais de Dr Igor Calzada, MBA, FeRSA (20)
Ćltimo
Ćltimo (20)
Open Innovation Forum & Museum of Moscow in Russia 29Oct2015 & 31Oct2015 Dr Igor Calzada MBA Univ Oxford Future of Cities.ppt
- 1. #ŠŃŠŗŠ»ŃŃŠµŠ½ŠøŠµ Ā Š£Š¼Š½ŃŠ¹ Ā Š³Š¾ŃŠ¾Š“ Ā Museum Ā of Ā Moscow Ā & Ā Open Ā Innovation Ā Forum Ā http://mosmuseum.ru/lectures/p/2479/ Ā Moscow Ā (Russia) Ā 31st Ā October Ā 2015 Ā 18:00 Ā Dr Ā Igor Ā Calzada Ā MBA Ā Lecturer, Ā Research Ā Fellow Ā & Ā Policy Ā Adviser Ā Future Ā of Ā Cities Ā University Ā of Ā Oxford Ā Ā @icalzada Ā http://www.igorcalzada.com/about Ā Ā Ā igor.calzada@compas.ox.ac.uk Ā Ā
- 2. #Unplugging Ā Ā the Ā Ā Smart Ā City Ā Ā
- 5. ŠŠøŠ°Š»Š¾Š³Šø Ā Š¾ Ā ŃŠ¾Š²ŃŠµŠ¼ŠµŠ½Š½Š¾Š¼ Ā Š³Š¾ŃŠ¾Š“Šµ Ā Šø Ā Š³Š¾ŃŠ¾Š“ŃŠŗŠ¾Š¼ Ā Š¾Š±ŃŠ°Š·Šµ Ā Š¶ŠøŠ·Š½Šø Ā Š±ŃŠ“ŃŃŠµŠ³Š¾ Ā Ā 31 Ā Š¾ŠŗŃŃŠ±ŃŃ Ā ā Ā 18:00 Ā Ā Š»ŠµŠŗŃŠøŃ Ā ā Ā Š¼ŃŠ·ŠµŠ¹ Ā Š¼Š¾ŃŠŗŠ²Ń Ā Ā
- 20. 1. Ā Introduc6on: Ā Ā The Ā Increasing Ā Global Ā Urban Ā EvoluTon Ā Ā 2. Ā (10) Ā Provoca6ons: Ā To Ā Design Ā Smart Ā City Ā Strategies Ā in Ā Moscow Ā Ā 3. Ā (10) Ā Proposal: Ā Unplugging Ā the Ā Smart Ā CiTes Ā Ā 4. Ā (10) Ā Final Ā Remarks: Ā Some Ā Homework Ā
- 28. 1950 Ā 30% Ā Ā URBAN Ā GLOBAL Ā POPULATION Ā Source: @UNICEF
- 29. 1980 Ā 40% Ā Ā URBAN Ā GLOBAL Ā POPULATION Ā Source: @UNICEF
- 30. 2010 Ā 52% Ā Ā URBAN Ā GLOBAL Ā POPULATION Ā Source: @UNICEF
- 31. 2030 Ā 61% Ā Ā URBAN Ā GLOBAL Ā POPULATION Ā Source: @UNICEF
- 32. 2050 Ā 72% Ā Ā URBAN Ā GLOBAL Ā POPULATION Ā Source: @UNICEF
- 35. 21st century > The century of/for CITIES By @icalzada
- 40. 31/10/15 WP 9: Oxford Page 40 2> Scoping WP9 āReplicationā
- 41. 2. (10) Provocations: To Design Smart City Strategies In Moscow By @icalzada
- 43. By @TheAtlantic 2 SMART CITY No recipes
- 46. By @icalzada By @icalzada By @icalzada By @icalzada By @WikiCommons By @lum_irun 5 Socially Innovative
- 48. Public Private Academia Civil Society Social Entrepreneurs/ Activists By @icalzada 7 Stakeholders
- 49. By @LSECities By @bilbaometropoli By @ifuturecities By @CitiesOxford 8 City-to-City Benchmarking
- 50. By @translokal in www.cityregions.org 9 Metropolitan + City-Regional
- 51. 10 Experience + Open Data Calzada, Ā I. Ā (2015), Ā Benchmarking Ā Future Ā City-ĀāRegions Ā beyond Ā NaTon-ĀāStates, Ā RSRS Ā Regional Ā Studies Ā Regional Ā Science, Ā 2:1, Ā 350-Āā361, Ā DOI: Ā 10.1080/21681376.2015.1046908. Ā
- 53. Project Ā Ci6es Ā involved Ā Timeframe Ā & Ā TiSle Ā Funding Ā ins6tu6ons Ā EU-ĀāFP7-Āā314277-Āā Ā STEEP Ā Smart Ā City Ā Plan Ā ā¢āÆ Bristol Ā (UK) Ā Ā ā¢āÆ St Ā SebasTan Ā (SP) Ā Ā ā¢āÆ Florence Ā (IT) Ā 2014-Āā2015: Ā Systems Ā Thinking Ā for Ā comprehensive Ā city Ā Eļ¬cient Ā Energy Ā Planning Ā Smart Ā City Ā Master Ā Plan. Ā Ā EU-ĀāFP7 Ā hvp://www.smartsteep.eu/ Ā Ā EU-ĀāFP7-Āā314679 Ā STEP Ā UP Ā Smart Ā City Ā Plan Ā ā¢āÆ Glasgow Ā (UK) Ā ā¢āÆ Riga Ā (Latvia) Ā ā¢āÆ Gothenburg Ā (Sweden) Ā ā¢āÆ Ghent Ā (Belgium) Ā 2014-Āā2015: Ā Energy Ā Planning Ā for Ā CiTes Ā Smart Ā City Ā Master Ā Plan. Ā Ā MSc Ā Master Ā in Ā Global Ā Sustainable Ā CiTes. Ā EU-ĀāFP7 Ā www.stepupsmartciTes.eu/ Ā Ā EU-ĀāH2020SCC-ĀāLighthouse. Ā REPLICATE Ā ā¢āÆ Bristol Ā (UK) Ā Ā ā¢āÆ St Ā SebasTan Ā (SP) Ā Ā ā¢āÆ Florence Ā (IT) Ā ā¢āÆ Laussane Ā (SW) Ā ā¢āÆ Essen Ā (DE) Ā ā¢āÆ NilĆ¼fer Ā (TK) Ā 2015-Āā2020: Ā REinassance Ā of Ā PLaces Ā with Ā InnovaTve Ā CiTzenship Ā And Ā TEchnologyā. Ā EU-ĀāH2020-ĀāSCC Ā Ā EU-ĀāMarie Ā Curie Ā AcTons-ĀāCofund-Āā Regional Ā Programmes Ā ā¢āÆ Bristol Ā (UK) Ā ā¢āÆ Glasgow Ā (UK) Ā ā¢āÆ Bilbao Ā (SP) Ā ā¢āÆ Barcelona Ā (SP) Ā 2015-Āā2016: Ā Comparing Ā Smart Ā City-ĀāRegional Ā Governance Ā Strategies: Ā Bilbao, Ā Barcelona, Ā Bristol Ā & Ā Glasgowā. Ā EU-ĀāMarie Ā Curie Ā AcTons-Āā Ā Cofund Ā Smart City-to-City Learning & Benchmarking
- 54. 3. Proposal (10): Unplugging the Smart City By @icalzada
- 56. #UNPLUGGING Ā the Ā Ā SMART Ā Ā CITY Ā 1 Ā WHO Ā 2 Ā HOW Ā 3 Ā SYSTEMS Ā 4 Ā GOVERNANCE Ā 5 Ā INFORMATION Ā 6 Ā FOCUS Ā 7 Ā SPACE Ā 8 Ā DESIGN Ā 9 Ā SOCIO-ĀāPOLITICAL Ā PROCESSES Ā 10 Ā POLITICAL Ā ECONOMY Ā Social Ā and Ā Digital Ā Divide Ā Individualism Ā vs Ā Collec6vism Ā Socio Ā vs Ā Technical Ā Systems Ā Master Ā Planning Ā vs Ā Emergent Ā Plan Ā and Ā Top Ā Down Ā vs. Ā BoSom Ā Up Ā Overload Ā vs Ā Scarcity Ā Social Ā Networking Ā vs Ā Social Ā Capital Ā Context Ā Collapse Ā Ambient Ā Commons Ā Control Ā & Ā Norma6ve Ā vs Ā Free Ā & Ā Emergent Ā Proļ¬table Ā vs Ā Non-Āā Proļ¬table Ā From Ā High Ā Individualism Ā vs Ā CollecTvism Ā ArTļ¬cial Ā Top Ā Down Ā and Ā Master Ā Planning Ā Controlled Ā InteracTon Ā Fragmented Ā Infrastructure-Āā centered Ā Control Ā and Ā NormaTve Ā Private Ā and Ā Financially Ā To Ā Low Ā Networked Ā Individualism Ā or Ā Neo-Āā communitarianism Ā Integrated Ā Bovom Ā Up Ā and Ā Emergent Ā Plan Ā Open Ā Data Ā Trust Ā Contextualized Ā People-Āācentered Ā Free Ā and Ā Emergent Ā Communitarian Ā and Ā Socio-Āāeconomical Ā Ā Calzada, Ā I. Ā & Ā Cobo, Ā C. Ā (2015), Ā Ā Unplugging: Ā Deconstruc1ng Ā the Ā Smart Ā City, Ā Ā Ā Journal Ā of Ā Urban Ā Technology. Ā Ā Ā DOI: Ā 10.1080/10630732.2014.971535 Ā Ā hvp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10630732.2014.971535#abstract Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā Ā
- 57. by Ā Dan Ā Perjovschi Ā
- 58. #HER Ā
- 59. Beyond Ā Hyper Ā Connected Ā SocieTes Ā > Ā Need Ā to Ā Deconstruct Ā the Ā Smart Ā City Ā
- 60. #UNPLUGGING Ā (precondiTons) Ā Ā ā āÆ Being Ā digitally Ā connected/#plugged Ā is Ā no Ā guarantee Ā of Ā being Ā smart Ā (Evans, Ā 2002) Ā ā”āÆ Technology Ā is Ā never Ā neutral Ā (and Ā it Ā is Ā always Ā poliTcally Ā constructed) Ā (Williams, Ā 1983) Ā
- 61. #UNPLUGGING Ā (deļ¬niTons) Ā Ā ā āÆ = Ā Being Ā Smartly Ā #Plugged Ā ā”āÆ Subtle Ā noTon Ā & Ā novel Ā trend Ā that Ā merges Ā socially Ā innovaTve Ā oļ¬-Āāline Ā and Ā on-Āāline Ā interacTon Ā from Ā a Ā self-ĀācriTcal Ā view. Ā
- 62. SMART? Ā
- 63. #UNPLUGGING Ā > Ā liquid Ā
- 65. #UNPLUGGING Ā > Ā human Ā scale Ā
- 66. #UNPLUGGING Ā Ā ā āÆā Ā Techno-Āādeterminism Ā ā”āÆā Ā (just) Ā Corporate-Āāled Ā approach Ā Ā Smart Ā City Ā have Ā to>could>will Ā EVOLVE Ā throughout Ā Ā Ā 10 Ā TRANSITIONS Ā
- 67. #UNPLUGGING: Ā + Ā Info Ā Ā ā āÆ Calzada, Ā I. Ā & Ā Cobo, Ā C. Ā (2014) Ā Unplugging: Ā Deconstruc1ng Ā the Ā Smart Ā City, Ā Journal Ā of Ā Urban Ā Technology, Ā hvp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2014.971535 Ā ā”āÆ The Ā Oxford Ā Research Ā Centre Ā in Ā HumaniTes Ā Ā ā¢āÆ www.unplugging.eu Ā
- 68. #UNPLUGGING Ā Ā 10 Ā TRANSITIONS Ā > Ā
- 69. 1 Ā WHO Ā Ā
- 70. 1 Ā TRANSITION: Ā WHO Ā Ā DIGITAL Ā & Ā SOCIAL Ā DIVIDE Ā Ā ONE Ā > Ā MULTIPLE Ā Ā
- 71. 2 Ā HOW Ā Ā
- 72. 2 Ā TRANSITION: Ā HOW Ā Ā INDIVIDUALISM Ā vs Ā COLLECTIVISM Ā > Ā Ā NETWORKED Ā INDIVIDUALISM Ā Ā
- 73. 3 Ā SYSTEMS Ā Ā
- 74. 3 Ā TRANSITION: Ā Ā SOCIO-ĀāTECHNICAL Ā SYSTEMS Ā Ā ARTIFICIAL Ā > Ā INTEGRATED Ā Ā
- 75. TopDown Ā BovomUp Ā 4 Ā GOVERNANCE Ā Ā
- 76. 4 Ā TRANSITION: Ā GOVERNANCE Ā Ā TOP-ĀāDOWN Ā & Ā MASTER Ā PLANNING Ā > Ā BOTTOM-ĀāUP Ā & Ā EMERGENT Ā
- 77. 5 Ā INFORMATION Ā Ā
- 78. 5 Ā TRANSITION: Ā INFORMATION Ā Ā SCARCITY Ā & Ā OVERLOAD Ā > Ā OPEN Ā āBIGā Ā DATA Ā ? Ā
- 79. 6 Ā FOCUS Ā Ā
- 80. 6 Ā TRANSITION: Ā FOCUS Ā Ā āSIMPLEā Ā SOCIAL Ā NETWORKING Ā INTERACTION Ā > Ā TRUST Ā BASED Ā SOCIAL Ā CAPITAL Ā
- 81. 7 Ā TRANSITION: Ā SPACE Ā Ā CONTEXT Ā COLLAPSE Ā Ā FRAGMENTED Ā > Ā CONTEXTUALIZED Ā
- 82. 7 Ā SPACE Ā CONTEXT Ā COLLAPSE Ā āI don't want to run the risk of having a confrontation in real life so if I have it on Facebook they can take it in, deal with it themselves, and then it's over and done with and I never had to say anything.ā ā Robert* by Ā @DugStef Ā
- 83. 8 Ā TRANSITION: Ā DESIGN Ā Ā AMBIENT Ā COMMONS Ā Ā INFRASTRUCTURE-ĀāCENTERED Ā > Ā PEOPLE-ĀāCENTERED Ā
- 84. 8 Ā DESIGN Ā AMBIENT Ā COMMONS Ā
- 85. 9 Ā TRANSITION: Ā Ā SOCIO-ĀāPOLITICAL Ā PROCESSES Ā Ā CONTROL Ā & Ā NORMATIVE Ā > Ā EMERGENT Ā & Ā COMPLEX Ā
- 87. 10 Ā TRANSITION: Ā Ā POLITICAL Ā ECONOMY Ā Ā PRIVATE Ā & Ā FINANCIALLY Ā Ā PROFITABLE Ā > Ā COMMUNITARIAN Ā & Ā SOCIO-ĀāECONOMICALLY Ā PROFITABLE Ā
- 88. 10 Ā POLITICAL Ā ECONOMY Ā
- 89. Should Ā / Ā Could Ā we Ā #Unplug Ā the Ā Smart Ā City Ā ? Ā Can Ā we Ā test Ā it? Ā www.unplugging.eu Ā Ā
- 90. 4. Final Remarks (10): Some Homework By @icalzada
- 91. 1.āÆ We need more ābigā methodologies, not more big data. 2.āÆ Work out what problems need fixing. 3.āÆ Find collective leaderships. 4.āÆ The tech is probably the easiest bit to fix: Who pays, who drives the changes, who should be involved? 5.āÆ Share data at district micro level to foster an ecosystem for innovation in cities. 6.āÆ Design from the bottom up: How? 7.āÆ Get urban stakeholders on board (Penta Helix) 8.āÆ New challenge: Tailored business and replicable models. 9.āÆ More intensity in the learning process with other cities than producing useless apps. 10.āÆ Future of the the Smart City: Towards Prosumer entrepreneurial āsmartā cities?
- 93. Š”ŠæŠ°ŃŠøŠ±Š¾ Ā Š·Š° Ā Š²Š½ŠøŠ¼Š°Š½ŠøŠµ Ā Ā Thanks Ā for Ā your Ā avenTon Ā Ā Eskerrik Ā asko Ā zuen Ā arretagaTk Ā Ā Ā Dr Ā Igor Ā Calzada Ā MBA Ā @icalzada Ā www.igorcalzada.com/about Ā Ā igor.calzada@compas.ox.ac.uk Ā Ā