Matthew Goode, Geodesist, Fugro-Intersite BV

1. Fugro’s G2+ worldwide centimetre-level positioning service
Matthew Goode, Fugro Intersite B.V.
Offshore Energy 2015, 14 October 2015, Amsterdam, Netherlands

2. www.fugro.com2
History of positioning within Fugro
1974 1986
1996
2001
1984
Starfix positioning
system
Transit system
first used
Satellite based
DGPS
High frequency DGPS
service
HP dual-frequency
service

3. www.fugro.com3
History of positioning within Fugro
2006 2014
20152009
G4 multi-constellation
PPP service
G2+ ambiguity-fixed
PPP service
G2 GPS & GLONASS
PPP service
XP precise point
positioning (PPP) service

4. www.fugro.com4
 Orbit and clock corrections for GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou and Galileo
 Improved availability and reliability
 Galileo corrections available when Initial Operational Capability
(IOC) announced by the European Union
Starfix.G4

5. www.fugro.com5
 Uses dual frequency code and
carrier phase measurements.
 Considering the listed parameters:
 Precise satellite position known
 Precise satellite clock known
 Unknown receiver position of
most interest
 Integer ambiguity for carrier phase
measurements cannot be
separated from the hardware
biases, so estimated as lumped
real valued parameter.
 Fixing ambiguity to an integer
would give cm-level accuracy.
Standard PPP

6. www.fugro.com6
GNSS orbit and clock corrections

7. www.fugro.com7
Standard PPP approach
Precise orbits and
clocks
GNSS
measurements
PPP engine
Position

8. www.fugro.com8
 Satellite biases common for all
receivers in a network.
 Estimate satellite biases using
reference station network and supply
this to the user.
 Single differencing using a reference
satellite removes receiver biases.
 Remaining estimated ambiguity has
an integer nature.
 Attempt to fix to the correct integer
value for cm-level accuracy.
 Ability to fix ambiguities to integer
value is dependent on observation
conditions.
PPP with integer ambiguity resolution

9. www.fugro.com9
G2+ reference station network

10. www.fugro.com10
PPP-IAR approach
Precise orbits and
clocks
GNSS
measurements
PPP engine
Ambiguities
fixed?
Ambiguity fixed
position
Ambiguity float
position
Yes No
Hardware
biases
Ionosphere
Troposphere
(optional)

11. www.fugro.com11
Static results

12. www.fugro.com12
Static results: local comparison
 StarPack receivers located at
Fugro reference stations.
 Starfix.G2+ real-time orbit, clock
and hardware bias corrections
received through L-band link.
 Identical set-up as used in the
field.
 95% accuracy of 3.5 cm in
horizontal and 8 cm in vertical
achieved.

13. www.fugro.com13
Static results: Bergen, Norway

14. www.fugro.com14
Static results: Bergen, Norway

15. www.fugro.com15
Static results: Great Yarmouth, United Kingdom

16. www.fugro.com16
Static results: Great Yarmouth, United Kingdom

17. www.fugro.com17
Static results: Houston, TX, USA

18. www.fugro.com18
Static results: Houston, TX, USA

19. www.fugro.com19
Static results: Leidschendam, The Netherlands

20. www.fugro.com20
Static results: Leidschendam, The Netherlands

21. www.fugro.com21
Static results: Starfix.G2 vs Starfix.G2+
Values above the Starfix.G2+ bars show the percentage improvement compared to Starfix.G2

22. www.fugro.com22
Static results: global comparison
 Global distribution of 101 sites
 Comparison between Starfix.G2 and Starfix.G2+ solutions
 Comparison of global sites for one day
 Comparison of one site over 8 days

23. www.fugro.com23
Static results: 7 October 2015, 101 sites

24. www.fugro.com24
Static results: 8 days, Perth, Australia

25. www.fugro.com25
Static results: 8 days, Istanbul, Turkey

26. www.fugro.com26
Static results: 8 days, Romoland, CA, USA

27. www.fugro.com27
Dynamic
results

28. www.fugro.com28
Gulf of Mexico test bed

29. www.fugro.com29
Gulf of Mexico test bed

30. www.fugro.com30
 Dynamic environment with
real-time solution.
 Two antennae mounted on a
fixed surface with known
distance.
 Two StarPack receivers using
common source of G2+
corrections (hardware biases).
 Difference in north, east and up
components calculated.
Comparison between different sources of hardware delay
G2+
corrections
G2+
Solution
(172)
G2+
Solution
(175)
Vector
calculated
172 175

31. www.fugro.com31
Vessel configuration
175172
175 172

32. www.fugro.com32
Baseline comparison

33. www.fugro.com33
Offshore
Applications

34. www.fugro.com34
Offshore Applications: real-time tide measurement

35. www.fugro.com35
Offshore Applications: buoy height dynamics

36. www.fugro.com36
Offshore Applications: real-time platform monitoring

37. www.fugro.com37
Offshore Applications: Unmanned vessels
Source: Rolls-Royce Holdings/Bloomberg

38. www.fugro.com38
 Global real-time positioning with a
95% accuracy of 3.5 cm in
horizontal and 8 cm in height.
 Tailored for the offshore market.
 Successfully tested in dynamic
environments.
 Already in use by Fugro
customers.
Conclusions

39. Matthew Goode
GNSS R&D Team
Geodesist
Fugro Intersite B.V.
Dillenburgsingel 69
Leidschendam 2263 HW
The Netherlands
M.Goode@fugro.nl