1. Over 25 Years Experience in
Information Technology Project Management
Conducting the Design, Development and Implementation of Project
Management Processes and Techniques to Improve Performance,
Deliverables and Business Results while Monitoring, Balancing and
Continuous Reviewing of the Triple Constraints; Scope/Quality,
Schedule/Time and Costs/Resources.
Skilled in developing a detailed statement-of-work, operations
functional documentation, project action plans, schedules, critical path
analysis, analyze project metrics & statistics, identifying risk and
creating a plan to abate and mitigate the risk, assembling project
team, assigning individual responsibilities, identifying resources
needed, monitoring progress to ensure timely and within budget
completion while implementing processes, which improve operational
efficiencies
Leveraging = People + Processes + Technologies
Thomas Grieser
703-787-8777
thomas@projectmanagerconsultant.com
www.projectmanagerconsultant.com

2. Prioritization Criteria
• High Customer Satisfaction • 25.0%
• Minimum Impact to Users • 10.0%
• Improvement Potential • 10.0%
• Probability with Quick Results • 10.0%
• Ease of Implementation • 20.0%
• Political • 25.0%

4. Tasks by Level of Risk by Skill Set
Data Base Administration 1-Low Risk 2-Medium Risk 3-High Risk
Database Administration
Daily Monitoring & System Checks x
Performance Monitoring x
Research x
Review Log Files x
Data Admiistration x
Scripting x
24 x 7 On-Call Support x
Security Updates (IAVAs, IAVTs, Patches) x
Disaster Recovery Site DataBase Support x
SAP Support
Transport Verification x
CCRs / Remedy
CCRs /NCRs x
Trouble Ticket Resolution x
Documentation
Documentation x
Administration
Administration - Meetings x
Administration - Knowledge Transfer x
4 4 7

5. Resource by Level of Skill Set by Level of Risk by Tasks
Code 421 - Application Support [3] Chris [2] Ailah [1] Antoine Total Hours Highest=1 to 1-Low 2-Medium 3-High Risk
/Day Lowest=6 R Risk
Hours i
Ranking s
k
Totals 8.50 8.00 8.00 24.50
System Support 5.00 3.50 5.00 13.50
System Support - System Administration 2.00 1.50 1.00 4.50 2 X
System Support - Research 1.00 2.00 3.00 3 X
System Support - Review Log Files 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 3 X
System Support - Performance Monitoring 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4 X
System Support - Daily Monitoring 3.00 X
CCRs/Remedy 2.00 3.00 0.50 5.50
Trouble Ticket Resolution 1.75 5.25 1 X
CCRs/Remedy - NCRS / CCRs 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.25 6 X
Documentation 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.50
Documentation 0.50 0.50 0.50 1.50 5 X
Administration 1.00 1.00 2.00 4.00
Administration - Office Support 0.50 2.50 4 X
Administration - Knowledge Transfer / OJT 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 5 X
Administration - Meetings 0.00 0.50 6 X
5 3 3

6. Systems Engineering Activities in the System Life Cycle
DoD Instruction 5000.2
D Life Cycle
U
R
A EchoStorm EchoStorm EchoStorm
P roposal
T New New Business Submit Preliminary
Prepares & Reviews Reviews &
I Business Reviews Proposal Statement of Work to
Submits & Creates a Contractual
O & Re- Submits Software Engineering
Preliminary Proposal Accepts SOW
N
A nalysi s of the
P relim inary
Identify Quantifiable Identify High -Level Software
S OW
CRB
5 Software Engineering Initial Requirements Schedule
Metrics Assumptions , ‘Level -of - Effort’ Engineering
Conducts an Capabilities Traceability Initial
[Size, Complexity , Constraints , By Receives
D Initial Review Analysis Matrix Technical Review
Modularity , ReUse ] Gaps & Risks Resource Type Contractual SOW
Requirement s
Defini tt ion
Software SMEs ‘Individual ‘Individual Owners
18 Identify Schedule CRB
Engineering Conduct Software Software Owners’ Software Owners’ Re -Assess Level of
Resource System
Details Sizing Estimates by Reviews Sizing Develop Test & Effort , Constraints
D Types Requirements Review
Functional Definition Resource Types Estimates Evaluation Plan & Risks
Design
40 Software Software Software Engineering Software Software Engineering Owners CRB
Software Engineering Schedule
Engineering Engineering Conducts Engineering Scope the Re -Assess Level of
Develops System & Preliminary
Develops Logical Develops Validation & Develops Level - of- Effort For Effort , Constraints &
D Sub -System Design Design Review
Design Data Architecture Verification Draft Design Coding Risks
Design
Software
Final
10 Schedule CRB
Engineering Submit
Critical
Develops Detailed ECN
D Design Review
Design
Development
Software Software Software Software Software Engineering Software CRB
70 Software Engineering Schedule Test
Engineering Engineering Engineering Engineering Develops Engineering
Conducts Integration Readiness
Begin Conducts Functional Develops Develops Operator’s Develops User’s
D Testing in SandBox Review
Coding Unit Testing Test Cases Admin Manual Manual Manual
I ntegrati on &
Testing
QA QA IA Schedule CRB
21 Information Quality
Information Quality Conducts Generates Generates Pre- Production
Assurance Assurance
Assurance Assurance System Testing Testing Readiness
D Scan Scan
Testing Results Results Review
I mplem entat ion
Val idation
5 Deploy Load Accepted Production CRB Operations Acceptable
&
Conduct Pilot Accepted Solution into Readiness & to Deploy to
D Pilot Production Review Maintenance Customers

8. A EVMS of our Cookie Baking Process
Our “Plan”
40 cookies per batch
5 batches per hour (200 cookies per hour)
Schedule: 5 hours to make 1,000 cookies
Budgeted cost per cookie –$0.05
Total Budget = $50.00
Analysis after One (1) Hour of Baking We!ve Made...
150 edible cookies –some were burnt, some hit the floor, the kids ate some, and fed some to the dog.
Actual cost of ingredients after one hour (ACWP) = $9.00
After One Hour of Making Cookies
Spending Plan / Baseline (BCWS) = $10.00
Earned Value / Accomplished Work (BCWP) = 150 cookies X $0.05/Cookie = $7.50
Actual Spending / Actual Cost (ACWP) = $9.00
Schedule Variance (SV) = BCWP –BCWS = –$2.50 (we!re behind schedule)
Cost Variance (CV) = BCWP –ACWP = $7.50 –$9.00 = –$1.50 (we!re over budget)
Schedule Performance Index (SPI) = BCWP / BCWS = 0.75 (we!re running at 75% of planned schedule)
Cost Performance Index (CPI) = BCWP / ACWP = 0.833 (we!re running about 17% over budget)

9. Earned Value Management Systems
Sample Work-BreakDown-Structure (WBS) with an
Organizational BreakDown Structure (OBS)

10. Earned Value Management Systems
Earned Value Management Systems

11. Thomas Grieser
5431 Charmont Court
Virginia Beach, Virginia 23455
703-787-8777
Thomas@projectmanagerconsultant.com
www.projectmanagerconsultant.com