3. Sections of this presentation
Life on mobile,
Practical Local SEO
Mobile user
behaviour
Boring history (good
for predicting the future)Future of search
An overview of
local search
4. Origin of mobile
1928One-way wireless
communication
Car and mobile
radio
Glavin
Manufacturing
Corporation
• Soon Motorola
1940
Two-way wireless
communication
Handie-Talkie
(late 1940)
Walkie-Talkie
(1942) Backpack
US Army Signal
Corps
Copyright granted for reuse by Matti Mattila
5. Fast-forward to 1991
• In 1991, Mark Weiser, a US scientist, coined the terms:
› Inch-sized computer
› Mobile
› Foot-sized computer
› Tablet
› Yard-sized computer
› Web-enabled TV
Mobile was mapped out
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
said in June 2010 mobile had:
1.5 times fixed broadband
6. Mobiles
• Most personal and confidential piece of technological device
• Used in active or personal contexts and activities in a natural and dynamic
way
• Used in a variety of situations:
The here and now
Rush
While
commuting
To fill idle
time
While
queuing
At home
Comfortably
sitting on the
sofa
7. What do we know about mobile?
Mobile is one of the most
under-researched areas,
academically
9. What we know about mobile
Lots of things, or is it?
Visually the same
as desktop
10. F-shaped pattern
• We scan webpages in a F shape
• Have you ever seen a navigation bar on the right hand side?
The drop is no surprise
11. Right-hand PPC ads removal has aligned search
http://www.brightedge.com/blog/google-four-ads-on-top/
12. What we know about mobile
Lots of things, or is it?
Size of screen does
not matter
13. What we know about mobile
Lots of things, or is it?
Social activity
14. What we know about mobile
Lots of things, or is it?
Reduces button
tapping accuracy by
30%
15. What we know about mobile
Lots of things, or is it?
Clutter free
16. What we know about mobile
Lots of things, or is it?
High-end mobiles
are similar to
desktop searchers
17. What we know about mobile
Lots of things, or is it?
Good abandonment
is higher
18. What we know about mobile
Lots of things, or is it?
~70% of searches
in work or at home
19. What we know about mobile
Lots of things, or is it?
Mostly static
searches
20. What we know about mobile
Lots of things, or is it?
Visually the same
as desktop
Size of screen
does not matter
Social activity
Reduces button
tapping accuracy
by 30%
Clutter free
High-end mobiles
are similar to
desktop searchers
Good
abandonment is
higher
~70% of searches
in work or at
home
Mostly static
searches
21. Mobile has come a long way!
• Blood pressure monitors
• Skin conduction
• Respiration sensors
In 2001
81% accuracy
23. One thing search engines are
now attempting to do,
through apps, is to enhance
mobile search software as
manufactures enhance
hardware
24. Google Now on Tap
• Mobile hardware has positively evolved
– Smaller, thinner handsets
– Better cameras etc
• Now attempts to evolve mobile software through
search using an App
• Integrated with Google Now
– Get recommendations (aiding Google to
better personalize your content)
– Carry out further searches directly in a third
party app
27. Mobile keywords
We were more
concerned about
minimizing the
number of typed
search terms Mid noughties,
average number of
search queries was 16
characters
Conversational search
(shifted the SEO
landscape more toward
long tail keyword
optimization)
29. Keywords
Use of words and phrases
iPhone
Mobile technology
explosion
1 or 2 words?
What the hell
happened?
30. Voice search is going to diminish the
searcher’s use of incorrect keywords
and therefore impact exact phrase
keywords
31. Categorising search queries
• When we search we often think of things we do not type
Samsung Galaxy Edge 7
Cognition
subjective reviews on
comprehensive information
Exhaustive Comprehensible Objective
Subjective Concrete Abstract
We often think
with these
keywords but
we do not type
them
32. Semantically, renaming search queries
Direct
[subjective 5 star
hotel in Miami]
Transformed
[review latest
blackberry handset]
None
[blackberry]
No more informational, navigational, transactional, connectivity
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
Nouns (unique) Nouns
(overlapping)
Verbs Adjectives
Difference between typed and voice
search queries and their component
words
Typed queries
Voice search
Transactional Informational
34. Boredom and mobile interaction
.
More indicative
of boredom
Switching phone on
Changing screen orientation
Not so
indicative
Social network notifications
Frequency of open notification centre
Change screen status
App launches
Charging time
Amount of transmitted data
Activesearch
forstimuli
Analysing if we are bored
35. Google Now
• There:
› to support task continuation
› help bored searchers
Purpose for mobile search
Boredom state
I don’t like,
I’m bored
Boredom trait
I used to
like, but
now I’m
bored
36. Boredom and search
• Mobile has an ephemeral nature
.
Evoked by an urgent
need
When is the next bus home?
Location-based filtering
Semantic tools
37. Boredom and search
• Mobile has an ephemeral nature
.
Triggered by desire to
fill idle time
Funniest cinema movies
Mobile-tailored content
Social tagging
38. Boredom and search
• Mobile has an ephemeral nature
.
Prompted by an
event, situation, no
need to fill
Which cinema shows the film I just
seen the announcement about?
Ephemeral need, response is not yet
needed
40. Requirements
• Physical store (address)
• Localised phone numbers
• Personalised, unique content per location/store
• Store directory
• Static store page
Homepage
London Manchester Glasgow
Store
directory
41. Local search engines
• Local search engines do not offer an advantage over a global search engine
• Google had the highest recall score (42%) compared to local search engines
• Search engine indexes are completely different
All The
Web
Hot Bot Google Altavista
Wisisimo Excite Surfwax
NZExplorer SearchNZ
Search
Now
Meta search
engines
Local search
engines
42. Global engine, behaviour and bias
• We often click on Points of Interest (POI) up to 3,000 meters away
• Engines prefer to rank stores that are within 2,000 meters away
43. We look local
• Implicit and explicit geo searches
• 30% reduction in performance tapping buttons when walking
– When we walk our arms move vertically
– This is why voice search exists
Click-through rates
44. Our behavior changes depending upon transport method
Our search behaviour changes on public transport
– Stronger observation on public transport
– Momentarily passes on the street
• Not an issue
• Continue walking
• Unwanted attention quickly passes
45. Local SEO, aligning with PPC?
• Engines may soon process mobile queries like PPC, whereby:
– Location
– Time of day
– Day of week
– Weather conditions
– Current activity of user
– Temporal patterns (i.e. weekday vs weekend)
• Will be factored into a mobile search
59. References
• Kato, M.P., Yamaoto, T., Ohshima, H., and Tanaka, K. Cognitive search intents hidden behind queries: A
user study on query formulations. WWW ‘14 Companion
• Schilit, B. N. Mobile computing: Looking to the future. Computer.
• Gomez-Barroso, J. L. Factors required for mobile search going mainstream. Online Information Review.
36(6)
• Xu, Z., Luo, X., Yu, J., and Xu, W. Measuring semantic similarity between words by removing noise and
redundancy in web snippets. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
• Matic, A., Pielot, M. and Oliver, N. Boredom-computer interaction: Boredom proneness and the use of
smartphone.
• Lane, N., Lymberopoulos, D., Zhao, F., Campbell, A. T. Hapori: Context-based local search for mobile
phones using community behavioural modeling and similarity. Ubicomp.
• Goldsten, J., Kantrowitz, M., Mittal, V., and Carbonell, J. Summarising text documents: Sentence and
evaluation metrics.
• Crossan, A., Murray-Smith, R., Brewser, S., Kelly, J., Musizza, B. Kelly, S.Gait phase effects in mobile
interaction. CHI 2005.
• Vang, K. J. Ethics of Google’s Knowledge Graph: Some considerations. Journal of Information,
Communication and Ethics in Society.
• Pielot, M. Dingler, T. Pedro, J. S., and Oliver, N. When attention is not scarce – detecting boredom from
mobile phone usage. Ubicomp.
• Kamvar, M. and Baluja, S. A large scale study of wireless search behavior: Google mobile search. CHI.
• Lei, Y., Uren, V., Motta, E. SemSearch: A search engine for the semantic web.
Key readings
62. Mobile will bring use closer to the searcher
Linking technology with the searcher
Link-less
world
Mobile
Conversational
search
Artificial
Intelligence
Sweat glands
Technology
Predictive
search
Semantics
Internet of
Things
Semantics,
technology and
mobile
Snippet length
Query type,
mobile
Hello, thanks for staying. I’m dying for another drink too…
My name is Gerald Murphy. I’m a paid Associate Lecturer of information retrieval in one of the UK’s oldest search departments.
I also write for the long-standing search engine marketing website in the world, Search Engine Watch
And I work with the coolest brands in BrightEdge, singlehandedly the best integrated SEO platform since we have partnerships with MajesticSEO, Facebook and Twitter
As you can tell from the background picture, and my beautiful accent, I’m a Belfast boy. The city that built the unsinkable ship that ended up sinking
Rather than do a boring presentation on just semantic search, I’ve split today’s presentation into 4 parts:
Semantic search
Keywords
Mobile
Future of search
Mobile are utilities, much like: gas, water and electric. This is why Google said that 91% of people have their mobile in a 3 meter radius 100% of the time
Although we are starting to understand the human factors of mobile, mobile, as an area of research, is still in its infancy
But, one thing we can agree on is…
…[read]
But, one thing we can agree on is…
…[read]
7 factors influence our choice of KWs
For semantics, 2 are particularly important…linguistics and voice search
[explain]
[read]
We think different things than we type.
Let’s say we want to buy a new phone. We often think like ‘subjective’ but we don’t write/type it.
Semantic engines should factor this in.
Today I present a newer version of ‘informational, navigational, transactional and connectivity’
They are direction, explicitly typing what we think
Transformed – some use of thinking
None, staying with old-school search patterns
Voice search uses significantly less nouns compared to typed KWs
First thing’s first, the term mobile is misleading. Most searches occur when we are at home or at work, we’re general static when we carry out a search
Boredom is not someone who has nothing to do, it is someone who is actively looking for stimulation but unable to find something stimulating
But, one thing we can agree on is…
…[read]
First thing’s first, the term mobile is misleading. Most searches occur when we are at home or at work, we’re general static when we carry out a search