Panel presentation for Special Library Association (SLA) bay area chapter Sunshine Week event March 30, 2011. Panel included Declan McCullagh, Chief political correspondent and senior writer for CNET and Rainey Reitman, Activism Director of the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

1. Wikileaks and libraries:
anatomy of a chilling effect
James Jacobs
Stanford University
March 30, 2011
SLA Bay Area Sunshine Week 2011 panel
jrjacobs@stanford.edu
Wednesday, March 30, 2011

2. Agenda
What’s Stanford Library doing? Role of the library
Community response/debate
Survey results
Wednesday, March 30, 2011
honor to be on the panel with Declan McCullagh and Rainey Reitman. I’ve been a long-time
fan of Declan’s journalistic work and the work of everyone at EFF

3. Stanford Library
Cataloged Wikileaks cable site OCLC# 694146844
[ http://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/8931965 ]
Cataloged CableSearch [ http://cablesearch.org/ ]
Periodically downloading torrent of Cable site archive
Have not as yet given access to local copies
Wednesday, March 30, 2011
Early December, 2010 CableSearch was created by the European Centre of Computer Assisted
Research and Dutch-Flemish association for investigative journalists to index and provide
fulltext search of cables as they’re released. they’re currently indexing 6372 cables (about 2%
of total). now have an alert service, full text search, tag clouds of popular search terms, often
used words, and tags as well as an API so that other developers can query the database and
create mashups.

4. Community response
Much chatter on library listservs
ALA Midwinter discussions and resolutions (late January)
Wikileaks survey to guage library action (February 8)
Bill Sleeman op-ed “A Librarian reacts to Wikileaks” & “A librarian
reacts to ‘A librarian reacts to WikiLeaks’” [ http://freegovinfo.info/
node/3178 ] (February 9)
Wednesday, March 30, 2011
Op-ed piece for Center for Journalism Ethics at UWisc
conflates and ignores several issues surrounding Wikileaks the organization and the leaked US State Department cables themselves
Bill’s arguments:
1. The cables were stolen, released (“dumped”) in an irresponsible manner and unauthenticated;
2. Assange's motivations are unclear;
3. Wikileaks release of information could lead to an undesired effect of *less* openness.
4. In other words, Bill is looking from a perspective of whether or not libraries/librarians should support Wikileaks. He comes to the conclusion that they should not.
Our counterarguments:
1. cables were in fact leaked *not* stolen, released in conjunction with reputable news organizations in a responsible manner, and authenticated by the govt's responses and
actions following the leak. Only 6321 of 251,287 have been released (15, 652 secret, 101,748 confidential, 133,887 unclassified but unclear where those 6321 fall) after
being vetted and redacted by WL and news orgs.
2. Can’t base collections decision solely on classification status. If that were the case, then Pentagon Papers would need to be taken off the shelf as it has never been
declassified.
3. Claiming the release *could* cause harm has actually caused harm in the form of a chilling effect on libraries. One could easily argue that the cable release will *not* cause
harm but will usher in a new era of govt transparency. Both speculations muddy the waters and cause libraries to ignore the real question: “What should libraries DO about the
cables?”

5. Wikileaks library survey
3 of 69 libraries cataloged link to WK cable site
1 of 70 currently downloading cables
2 of 67 plan to download
35/35 split on whether libraries should preserve and give access
44 Academic, 12 Public, 6 Law, 4 Special, 4 Other
http://snipurl.com/wikileakslibrarysurvey
Wednesday, March 30, 2011
NOT a scientific survey and only distributed to govt docs library forums (govdoc-l, godort, FGI).
1) Has your library cataloged the wikileaks cable site link for inclusion in your library catalog?
2) Are you currently downloading the Wikileaks cable archive for your library?
3) If yes, how are you giving access to your library's users?
4) If no, do you plan to download the Wikileaks cable archive?
5) If you aren't or do not have plans to download, why not?
6) Do you think it is important for libraries to preserve and give access to wikileaks cables?
7) Please explain your answer to Q6
8) Please feel free to comment here on any issue regarding the Wikileaks diplomatic cables
9) In what kind of library do you work?

6. Some survey responses
The cables are stolen goods. If someone left a box of stolen books at my library door, I
wouldn't accession them without the owner's consent. That said, I think libraries should
preserve the digital content of the cables and seek permission from the owners to make them
public.
These are U.S. government state secrets. Illegal on their face. Courts should decide about
legality, etc.
Wikileaks cables are classified and/or proprietary information
These are still classified documents. As a Federal Depository Library, I feel obligated to stay
within the law.
Maybe SOME libraries could do, but not all. I don't know if our library would consider it in
scope.
I think some libraries should be archiving and preserving this information for future generations
and to ensure access to the information for current users. Preservation and access are huge
parts of our mission as libraries.
It is important for them to be preserved but not necessarily libraries, maybe NARA, LC, or other
secure repositories
http://snipurl.com/wikileakslibrarysurvey
Wednesday, March 30, 2011
here are some sample responses. I tried to pick both +/- responses.
clear chilling effect is happening. many of the responses questioned the legality of the cables, called
them stolen goods.
most indicative response was #1
shows the cognitive dissonance in the community and clearly this dissonance is leading to inaction.
Frankly I was surprised by the response given that the library community is seen by itself and by the
public as a strong defender of privacy, civil rights, and access to information.
Stems from MSM coverage, response to WL by US companies (Amazon, Paypal, BoA etc) and US
legislators.
My hope is that every librarian here today will bring this discussion back to their libraries and will at
least catalog the link to the WL site. I will continue to advocate for many libraries archiving/preserving/
giving access to the WL cables and digital govt information in general. one cannot guarantee the
preservation or integrity of information without explicit effort. The idea of distributed preservation and
access is at the core of the Federal Depository Library Program. It’s critical to continue this mission in
the digital age.