1. Credit S i
C dit Suisse Financial Services Forum
Fi i lS i F
February 4, 2009

2. Forward-Looking Statements
This Presentation contains forward-looking statements and information based on management’s current expectations as of the date of this
presentation. Statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs or expectations and statements that assume or
are dependent upon future events, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties,
assumptions and other factors that may cause actual results to be materially different from those reflected in such forward-looking statements.
These factors include, among others, the occurrence of any event, change or other circumstances that could give rise to our ability to cost-
effectively refinance asset backed financing facilities due February 2009 (collectively the “2008 Asset Backed Financing Facilities”) including
asset-backed 2009, (collectively, 2008 Asset-Backed Facilities ),
any potential foreclosure on the student loans under those facilities following their termination; increased financing costs; limited liquidity; any
adverse outcomes in any significant litigation to which we are a party; our derivative counterparties terminating their positions with the
Company if permitted by their contracts and the Company substantially incurring additional costs to replace any terminated positions; changes
in the terms of student loans and the educational credit marketplace (including changes resulting from new laws and regulations and from the
implementation of applicable laws and regulations) which, among other things, may change the volume, average term and yields on student
p pp g ) , g g, y g , g y
loans under the Federal Family Education Loan Program (“FFELP”), may result in loans being originated or refinanced under non-FFELP
programs, or may affect the terms upon which banks and others agree to sell FFELP loans to the Company. The Company could also be
affected by: various liquidity programs being implemented by the federal government, changes in the demand for educational financing or in
financing preferences of lenders, educational institutions, students and their families; incorrect estimates or assumptions by management in
connection with the preparation of our consolidated financial statements; changes in the composition of our Managed FFELP and Private
Education Loan portfolios; changes in the general interest rate environment, including the rate relationships among relevant money market
instruments, and in the securitization markets for education loans, which may increase the costs or limit the availability of financings necessary
to initiate, purchase or carry education loans; changes in projections of losses from loan defaults; changes in general economic conditions;
changes in prepayment rates and credit spreads; and changes in the demand for debt management services and new laws or changes in
existing laws that govern debt management services. All forward-looking statements contained in the Presentation are qualified by these
cautionary statements and are made only as of the date of this Presentation The Company does not undertake any obligation to update or
Presentation.
revise these forward-looking statements to conform the statement to actual results or changes in the Company’s expectations.
2

3. Sallie Mae Proposition
• Strong business fundamentals
• Competitive, scale franchise
• FFELP profitability assured through 2010
• Liquidity improving and adequate to meet debt service
• ED facility provides unlimited funding for new FFELP originations through AY 09/10
• Expanding deposit funding – provides funding for new Private Credit Originations
• Asset class performs well despite weakening consumer credit
3

4. FFELP Originations
$24
$20
$16
($ in billions)
$12
$8
$4
$0
Sallie Mae Lender Partners
FFELP originations increased 25% in the 4th quarter
•
4

5. FFELP Funding
• $7.4 billion funded through the ED Purchase and Participation Program at
CP + 50 basis points
• Participation and Purchase Programs extended for the AY 09/10
• ED Conduit Program (Straight A Funding) is expected to begin in February
• The F d
Th Federal Reserve expects to commence lending under TALF i
lR tt l di d in
February
5

6. Private Education Loan Originations
• Originated $6.3 billion in 2008
• Average FICO score in Q4 ‘08 increased from prior year by 26 points to
738
• 74% of new loan originations had co-borrowers, up from 57% in prior
year
• Product pricing reflects current funding environment
• Raised $1.6 billion in Q408 in term bank deposits with a weighted average
maturity of 2.2 years
6

7. Recession Has Smaller Impact On College Grads
9.0
8.0
7.0
6.0
5.0
4.0
40
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.0
Total Unemployment Rate
Unemployment Rate with a Bachelor's Degree or Higher
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics
7

8. SLM Private Credit Default Emergence Profile – Payments Made
Loss Emergence Timing
Sallie Mae Signature Loans
3.0%
2.5%
rcent of Original Loan Balance
2.0%
1.5%
1 5%
L
1.0%
0.5%
Per
0.0%
0-12 13-24 25-36 37-48 49-60 61-72 73-84 85-96 97-108 109-120 121-132 133-144 145-156
Payments Made
Defaults (% of Original Loan Balance)
8

9. Portfolio Quality Increasing
Non-Cosigned
Non Cosigned Repayment Waves
Non-Traditional Repayment Waves
($ in millions)
($ in millions) $4,000
$1,000
$800 $3,000
$600
$2,000
$400
$1,000
$200
$0 $0
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Non cosigned
Non-cosigned $
Non-Traditional
Non Traditional $
Amounts shown above show dollar amount of loans that will enter repayment
• Non-Traditional net charge-off rate is 6 greater th Traditional
N T diti l th ff t i 6x t than T diti l
• 74% of new loan originations had co-borrowers, up from 57% in prior year,
g ,p p y ,
objective is 90% cosigned loans
• Non cosigned loans charge off at more than twice the rate of cosigned loans
9

10. Default Trends – Mix of Traditional vs. Non-Traditional
Net Charge-offs $
Charge offs Net Charge-off R t as a % of A R
N t Ch ff Rate f Avg Repay B l
Balance
800 25%
700
20%
600
500
Millions
s
15%
400
10%
300
200
5%
100
0%
-
2006 2007 2008 2009F
2006 2007 2008 2009F
Trad Non-Trad
Trad Non-Trad
• Net charge-offs driven by Non-Traditional loans
• Non-Traditional loans represents 14% of the Private Education Loan portfolio
• Higher Quality loans entering repayment in 2009 and 2010
10

11. Changes to Forbearance Policy
• Small segment (18%) of loans that are in forbearance account for
majority (58%) of defaults
• Of the remaining 82% of borrowers who received forbearance only 6%
have defaulted
• Reducing forbearance to certain borrowers will accelerate $225 million of
charge offs into 2009
• Forbearance is an effective and beneficial tool for both borrower and
lender
ld
11

12. Liquidity Position Update
• ED Purchase and Participation Program used for all new FFELP
originations
• Bank Deposits used for all new Private Education Loan originations
• ED Conduit (Straight A Funding) used for Term Financing for Short Term
Prime FFELP Loans
• TALF used for Term Financing for Short Term Prime FFELP Loans,
Consolidation & Private Education Loans
• $30 Billion of existing loans that meet criteria for ED Conduit and/or TALF
12

13. Funding Sources
$180 Billion Managed Student Loan Portfolio
Term
Fixed Spread
Funded*,
Liabilities
70%
with Average
Life of 4.3
years, 12%
ABCP
Conduit, 18%
• Employ conservative long-term funding model
* Term Funded includes 4% or $7.6 Billion of advances outstanding under the ED Purchase and Participation Program
13

14. Unsecured Debt Maturities
As f December 31 2008
A of D b 31,
(par value, $ in billions)
15.0
11.7
10.0
7.1 7.1
5.0
3.0
2.9
2.3
2.2
1.1
0.5
0.0
00
• On 01/22/09 S&P affirmed our senior unsecured debt rating of BBB-
14
Note: Does not include SLM Bank or Subsidiary funding

15. 2009 Outlook
Originations
• $5 - $6 billion in Private Education Loans
• $21 - $23 billion in FFELP Loans
Credit Quality
• Private Education Loan Provision of approximately $1 billion
• Total Provision of approximately $1.2 billion
• Private Education Loan Charge-offs of $1.3 billion with $225 million related to
changes in forbearance policy
Earnings
• Earnings per share between $1 45 and $1 65
$1.45 $1.65
• Assumes $250 million in revenue from government put in 3rd quarter
• Assumes CP/LIBOR spread to average 10 basis points
15

16. Summary
• Strong business fundamentals
• Competitive scale franchise
Competitive,
• FFELP profitability assured through 2010
• Emerging programs strengthen liquidity and improve profitability
16

17. GAAP to “Core Earnings” EPS Reconciliation
($ in thousands, except per share amounts) Years Ended
December 31, 2008 December 31, 2007
Dollars Diluted EPS Dollars Diluted EPS
$ (212,626) $ (0.69) $ (896,394) $ (2.26)
GAAP net income (loss)
Adjustment from GAAP to quot;Core Earningsquot;
442,190 (246,817)
Net impact of securitization accounting
560,381 1,340,792
Net impact of derivative accounting
102,056 168,501
Net impact of Floor Income
91,384 112,397
Net impact of acquired intangibles
Total quot;Core Earningsquot; Adjustments before income taxes
and minority interest in net earnings of
1,196,011 1,374,873
subsidiaries
(457,435) 81,845
Net tax effect
738,576 1,456,718
Total quot;Core Earningsquot; Adjustments
525,950 0.89 560,324 1.23
quot;Core Earningsquot; net income
quot;Core Earningquot; net income adjusted for non-recurring items
- 27,463
27 463
Merger related
Merger-related financing fees
- 35,456
Merger-related professional fees and other costs
52,778 14,178
Restructuring Expenses
4,136 -
Other reorganization-related asset impairments
- 27,726
Impact to FFELP provision for loan losses due to legislative changes
(74,138) -
Deceleration of premium amortization expense on loans
51,777
51 777 -
Acceleration of premium amortization expense on loans
34,553 0.07 104,823 0.24
Total after tax non-recurring items
17