Qualitative Research: What is it?
Understanding the world we live in by answering questions
like:
How opinions and attitudes are formed?
How people are affected by the events that go on around them?
How and why cultures have developed in the way they have?
What are the differences between groups?
The Four Main Types
Phenomenology: describing events, situations,
experiences or concepts.
Ethnography: studying peoples and cultures
Grounded theory : developing new theory
Case study: studying a specific case or set of cases
The Researcher's Role
Being a learner
‘Sucking in’ the atmosphere of the field
Reflecting on your own experiences
Sampling in Qualitative (and some Mixed)
Research
Sampling in qualitative research never seeks to generalize
to an entire population; it wants to tell a story from that
population
There is recognition of bias as the sample is non-random
and often small
The sample MUST represent some aspect of the
phenomena being studied in the research question
Sampling in Qualitative Research:
focus
Maximum variation
Homogenous sample selection
Extreme case sampling
Typical case sampling
Critical case sampling
Negative case sampling
Sampling in Qualitative/Mixed Research:
Techniques
Convenience/opportunistic
Quota (choosing groups and numbers)
Purposive/criterion-based
Snowball
Comprehensive
Fieldnotes
Sit alongside other techniques
Detailed notes and reflections of the field
Three types
Descriptive
Methodological
Reflexive
Occur after/before – rather than during
Reflexive Fieldnotes
Journaling of own
learning/experiences/
thoughts throughout the process
May sit within or alongside
descriptive and methodological
notes
Technically seen as journaling of
experience
Dilemmas
What dilemmas and issues to research does the practice of
observation bring?
How can fieldnotes counter these issues and dilemmas?
What else can the researcher do to ensure that the story
makes sense intrinsically (on an emic level) and extrinsically
(on an etic level)?
Why Observe?
To develop a theory
To prove/disprove a theory
Making use of an “opportunity” (Wolcott, 1995)
Provide a thick description to analyse
Provide an instrument of triangulation (alongside
interviewing and fieldnotes)
What to observe
Interactions
Between people
Between people and settings
Between people and yourself
Behaviours
Reactions
Routines
Interactions
The Context/Setting
The overt and the covert
How?
Traditional
Eyes, pen, and paper
Technological
Cameras/Video/ICT
Combination
Trad+Post
Even the post involves
a level of the traditional
To what degree/level
Four phases of observation
Scoping
Descriptive
Focused
Selective
Each involves a different
focus/depth
Phase One: Scoping
Familisation with the setting
Setting mapping
Apparent rules/structures
General impressions
Your own reactions
Any thoughts/hypotheses
A reflexive tool
Jottings and diagrams
Phase Two: Descriptive
Detailed descriptions of settings, interactions, and
behaviours
Focuses on questions that can be addressed through
observation
- the inquisitive eye
Uses delimiters and descriptors for current details and
future reference
Phase Three: Focused Observation
Descriptive observation focusing on specific descriptive
questions:
Space
Objects
Time
Behaviours
Individuals
Descriptive Questions
Space Object Act Activity Event Time Actor Goal Feeling
Space
Object
Act
Activity
Event
Time
Actor
Goal
Feeling
From Spradley (1980)
Phase Four: Selective Observation
The focusing down of ‘focus observations’
Looks at filling in the gaps
Providing other dimensions to focused observations and the phenomenon
in question
Focuses on the specifics
Individual
Event
Behaviour
Context
Observation and Technology
What are the strengths of involving technology as an
observation tool?
What ‘new’ dilemmas arise from using technology as an
observation tool?
Do paper and pen still have a role to play alongside
technology?
What is this role?