2. Introduction
It can be argued that religion and society share a
cause-and-effect relationship.
Sometimes changes in society effect religion.
Some see religion as a method of prevention for
change in society taking place as it aims to retain
traditional and conservative values.
Other times, religion causes a change in society
and society has to adopt a new moral code/order.
3. Inhibiting change
Functionalism:
Religion contributes to the well-being, stability and
value consensus of society.
DURKHEIM - social life can only exist if values are
shared and society is integrated into a coherent
whole.
The relationship between humans and God is
reflective of the relationship between humans and
society. It is not God who punishes us, but rather
society.
Collective worship reinforces social
solidarity, restrains deviant behaviour and restricts
social change.
4. Marxism:
Karl Marx believed that religion is a tool of
class exploitation and oppression.
Rewards such as the afterlife ease the pain of
believing that the world is a result of God’s will
and is unchangeable.
Social relationships seem inevitable and God-
given.
Religion involves the distortion of 'reality', it is
ideological.
5. Criticisms of functionalism
It is claimed that Durkheim's analysis is not
applicable to societies that are typified by
cultural diversity.
The idea that religion is the worship of
society has been criticised - as an
argument it is difficult to substantiate
other than through some notion of false
consciousness since people clearly
believe they are worshipping God.
6. Criticisms of Marxism
Marx’s approach takes a documentary
nature, but looking at the nature of faith
and the way in which the religion of the
poor concentrates on the afterlife.
Also there are some traditional Marxists
who adopt the view that religion can
bring about social change, a position also
adopted by some neo-Marxists.