SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 26
Baixar para ler offline
Designing
 Assessments &
Rubrics Aligned to
Our Units of Study
Learning Outcomes
Connections to previous PD
Criteria for quality common assessments &
effective scoring guides
Collaborative planning session to:
   Create a quality common assessment (with a
   scoring guide) to accurately infer student needs
   & curricular next steps
   Plan appropriately matched learning tasks that
   will lead up to the developed assessment
Code of Cooperation
Suspend certainty
What happens in Vegas...
Listen as an ally
Speak from awareness
Celebrate diversity
Mind the schedule
_________________________
Connections to Prior
    Work
•   Unwrapping the
    Standards

•   Designing
    Curricular Units

•   Levels of Bloom’s

•   Artisan Teacher
http://www.hulu.com/watch/292079
Two Major Types of
               Assessments
 Selected Response                            Constructed Response




Note: Performance-based assessments can be used to enable students to physically
                       demonstrate their understanding.
Assessment Type
           Activity
In your groups, create a visual representation of the
pros and cons of the type of assessment titled on your
chart paper. When your group is finished post the
chart paper on an accessible wall.

When all groups are finished, we will conduct a
gallery walk. Discuss with your group any
interesting findings or the similarities/differences
between the group work.

Share out with the whole group.
Selected-Response Item
                   Guidelines
Align with ‘unwrapped’ standards

Higher-order objectives

Application of knowledge vs. recall

Include new material - a true test of transfer

Be brief and clear

Use language that asks for the ‘best’ answer as opposed to the ‘correct’
answer

Use distractors which are all plausible
Constructed-Response Item
         Guidelines
   Items are open-ended

   Require students to create a response

   Students demonstrate an integrated understanding

   Items match the level of rigor

   Scoring guide required


Note: Constructed-response items provide for more valid inferences concerning
                          student level of mastery.
A Bucket of Trouble
An East Indian folk tale tells of two frogs on a farm that had the
misfortune of jumping into a pail of fresh milk left by a careless
son of the farmer. The frogs were unable to jump out of the pail and
had no recourse but to paddle continuously around in the milk in
order to stay afloat. The larger of the two finally gave up and sank
beneath the white waves, while the other frog kept on, determined to
keep on paddling as long as he had breath in his little body. At last,
thoroughly exhausted and unable to swim another stroke, he began
to sink to his demise, only to find himself resting upon something
solid beneath him. With one final exertion, he jumped from the large
pad of butter that he had churched by his incessant paddling out of
the milk pail to freedom.
Creating Questions
Use the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy question stems to
generate questions that could be used on a common
assessment with a focus on the following standard:


 CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RL.1.2 Retell
 stories, including key details, and
 demonstrate understanding of their
 central message or lesson
Sample Selected-Response
Question:
  Level 4: DRAW (inferences, conclusions, generalizations)

  This tale best illustrates which one of the
  following generalizations:
  a. Danger can show up in the most ordinary
     places.
  b. Events sometimes take a surprising turn
     if you refuse to quit.
  c. Everyone fails some of the time.
Sample Constructed-Response
Question:
 Level 5: SUPPORT (inferences, conclusions with text evidence)

                  Extended Response
   Write one paragraph defending your answer
    choice for the above multiple-choice question.
      State your choice and three examples to
    support it from the tale. Write a concluding
   sentence that summarizes and supports your
                     answer choice.
Assessment Criteria

                       of
              he level                           Results are analyzed to
Matc hed to t
         rigor                                     guide instruction




                                                                  Objec
                                                                       tive sc
                           Blended assessments                       const oring gui
                                                                          ructed       d
                               provide more                                     -respo es for
                                                                                      nse
                              comprehensive
                                   data
Steps to Designing a Unit
Assessment
     Determine the                Reference the specific        Reference Bloom’s          For selected-response
  assessment format to          ‘unwrapped’ priority upon      Taxonomy and begin        questions, make all of the
   achieve the purpose         which to base the assessment       writing items            distractors plausible




                                                                                              Develop learning
                                                                                           experiences which are
                                 Limit the total number of    Create a scoring guide
Be sure to include correct                                                                    congruent to the
                                 questions so that student    for constructed-response
 standard terminology                                                                      priority standard and
                                work can be scored quickly             items
                                                                                             lead up to the unit
e.g., identify, not label;   Grades K-1, five or six                                             assessment
   rotation, not turn        Grades 2-3, eight to ten
                             Grades 4-5, ten to twelve
Key Elements of Scoring
Specific, measurable,
observable, student-friendly
language

Samples matched to criteria
                                Scoring guides help
                                  ALL students
Criteria provided before task
                                     succeed!
Student access during task

Criteria used to evaluate
student work after task
Steps to Designing a Scoring
Guide
                                                                     Create criteria by
 Determine performance          Begin with criteria for the                                     Write the elements as
                                                                 referring to details of the
      levels (4-5)                    “goal” level                                                  verb phrases
                                                                     assessment task

                                                                                                 e.g. “identifies the
                                                                                               attributes of one main
                                                                                               character in the story”




                                                                                                      T
                                                                                                 Obje he result
                                                                 Apply the same criteria             ctive        :
Create the criteria for the     Create the criteria for the                                      quic      rubr
                                                                 for the final or “not yet”           k&a       ics f
         top level                 progressing level                                                        c         or
                                                                           level                     scori curate
                                                                                                           ng!
  e.g. “identifies the          e.g. Include only one            e.g. Include only one
attributes of two main           criterion that reads,            criterion that reads,
characters in the story,       “meets ______ of the Goal      “meets fewer than ______ of
 noting similarities &        criteria” (quantity based         the Goal criteria”; and
  differences between         on the number of criteria        “task to be repeated after
         them”                     for the goal level                  reteaching”
Sample Constructed-Response
Question:
 Level 5: SUPPORT (inferences, conclusions with text evidence)

                  Extended Response
    Write one paragraph defending your answer
    choice for the above multiple-choice question.
       State your choice and three examples to
    support it from the tale. Write a concluding
     sentence that summarizes or supports your
                     answer choice.
A Bucket of Trouble
           Sample Scoring Guide:
Advanced: Meets all “Goal” criteria plus
          Includes more than one reason for why the selected choice is better than other two
          choices
          Includes real-life connections or experiences in support of selected choice
Goal
          States answer choice
          Supports answer choice with reason why selected choice is better than other two
          choices
          Writes one paragraphs
          Writes concluding sentence that summarizes or supports answer choice
Progressing
          Meets 2-3 of the Goal criteria
Beginning
          Meets fewer than 2 of the Goal criteria
A Bucket of Trouble
               Sample Scoring Guide:
                                                                Progressing                 Beginning
   Criteria     Advanced (4) Proficient (3)
                                                                    (2)                        (1)

  Drawing                               Selects the correct
 Conclusions                                 answer


                Provides more than 3
 Supporting      examples to support    Provides 3 examples     Provides 2 examples Provides 1-2 examples
                    answer choice;        from the text to        from the text to   that may not support
  Evidence        Includes real-life   support answer choice   support answer choice evidence from the text
                 connections to text
                    Writes 1 or more   Writes 1 paragraph          Writes less than a        Writes less than a
 Concluding        paragraphs with a    with a concluding      paragraph that includes    paragraph that does not
                 concluding sentence       sentence to         a concluding sentence to    include a concluding
Summarization   to summarize/support   summarize/support          summarize/support       sentence to summarize/
                     answer choice        answer choice             answer choice          support answer choice
Developing Learning
Criteria for developing learning
experiences to lead up to the common
assessment:
  Engaging
  Congruent
  Increasing in thinking, skill, and
  rigor
Learning Task
Read Goldilocks
At your tables use Bloom’s Revised to
create learning tasks (activities &
products) for 4 of the 6 levels on the
provided chart paper
Discuss whole group
Reflective Planning
Create a common assessment based on an upcoming
unit of study (use the ‘unwrapping’ organizer to
guide questions)
Develop a scoring guide for constructed-response
questions (rubistar/4teachers.org)
Plan 3-4 engaging learning experiences which are
congruent with the created assessment and steadily
increase in thinking, skill, and rigor
Tying It All Together

Artisan Connections

Share Out

Revised +/∆

What’s Next
What’s Next?
Gwen will plan to meet with each grade level
during the month of March to discuss your
progress and gain insight into the process. It is
expected that each grade level will have taught
the designed learning experiences,
administered the common assessment, utilized
the developed rubrics to score the assessment,
and collaboratively analyzed the data to
inform instructional next steps.

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Prosposed final report card
Prosposed final report cardProsposed final report card
Prosposed final report cardSarah Soltau
 
Assessment techniques overview
Assessment techniques overviewAssessment techniques overview
Assessment techniques overviewGavin Henning
 
Whs learning journey final final
Whs learning journey final finalWhs learning journey final final
Whs learning journey final finalmatthewbebbington
 
Word ppt publisher_abp_december_2010
Word ppt publisher_abp_december_2010Word ppt publisher_abp_december_2010
Word ppt publisher_abp_december_2010TeachBiz
 
Intro to CCSS - East China 2-
Intro to CCSS - East China 2-Intro to CCSS - East China 2-
Intro to CCSS - East China 2-Laura Chambless
 
Writing in the Common Core
Writing in the Common CoreWriting in the Common Core
Writing in the Common Corejgratman
 
Effects of a Scaffold on Quality of Goals Set By Undergraduate Students
Effects of a Scaffold on Quality of Goals Set By Undergraduate StudentsEffects of a Scaffold on Quality of Goals Set By Undergraduate Students
Effects of a Scaffold on Quality of Goals Set By Undergraduate StudentsMariel Miller
 

Mais procurados (10)

Fs 3 episode3
Fs 3 episode3Fs 3 episode3
Fs 3 episode3
 
Prosposed final report card
Prosposed final report cardProsposed final report card
Prosposed final report card
 
Assessment techniques overview
Assessment techniques overviewAssessment techniques overview
Assessment techniques overview
 
Fs 2 episode 1
Fs 2 episode 1Fs 2 episode 1
Fs 2 episode 1
 
Whs learning journey final final
Whs learning journey final finalWhs learning journey final final
Whs learning journey final final
 
Note 1
Note 1Note 1
Note 1
 
Word ppt publisher_abp_december_2010
Word ppt publisher_abp_december_2010Word ppt publisher_abp_december_2010
Word ppt publisher_abp_december_2010
 
Intro to CCSS - East China 2-
Intro to CCSS - East China 2-Intro to CCSS - East China 2-
Intro to CCSS - East China 2-
 
Writing in the Common Core
Writing in the Common CoreWriting in the Common Core
Writing in the Common Core
 
Effects of a Scaffold on Quality of Goals Set By Undergraduate Students
Effects of a Scaffold on Quality of Goals Set By Undergraduate StudentsEffects of a Scaffold on Quality of Goals Set By Undergraduate Students
Effects of a Scaffold on Quality of Goals Set By Undergraduate Students
 

Semelhante a Assessments & Rubrics PD 2.22.13

New Syllabus Mathematics Seminar 5 Oct
New Syllabus Mathematics Seminar 5 OctNew Syllabus Mathematics Seminar 5 Oct
New Syllabus Mathematics Seminar 5 OctJimmy Keng
 
Building your assessments to meet course objectives -detc
Building your assessments to meet course objectives -detcBuilding your assessments to meet course objectives -detc
Building your assessments to meet course objectives -detcostromae
 
Rating scales Chapter 7 by Ahmet YUSUF
Rating scales Chapter 7  by Ahmet YUSUFRating scales Chapter 7  by Ahmet YUSUF
Rating scales Chapter 7 by Ahmet YUSUFأحمد يوسف
 
Nj model curriculum
Nj model curriculumNj model curriculum
Nj model curriculumMrSanchez
 
Standards Driven Classroom Checklist
Standards Driven Classroom ChecklistStandards Driven Classroom Checklist
Standards Driven Classroom Checklistvmonacelli
 
Australian Animals
Australian AnimalsAustralian Animals
Australian Animalsrobynscott
 
Web quest-template-pdf-format1371
Web quest-template-pdf-format1371Web quest-template-pdf-format1371
Web quest-template-pdf-format1371robynscott
 
Test construction edited
Test construction editedTest construction edited
Test construction editedArnel Rivera
 
High school rubrics
High school rubrics High school rubrics
High school rubrics Omar Noursi
 
Assessing assessments - Leadership Portfolio Presentation
Assessing assessments - Leadership Portfolio PresentationAssessing assessments - Leadership Portfolio Presentation
Assessing assessments - Leadership Portfolio PresentationKristin Crowley
 
Storytelling: Rhetoric of heuristic evaluation
Storytelling: Rhetoric of heuristic evaluationStorytelling: Rhetoric of heuristic evaluation
Storytelling: Rhetoric of heuristic evaluationUX Firm, LLC
 
Paratesol Workshop on Rubrics
Paratesol Workshop on RubricsParatesol Workshop on Rubrics
Paratesol Workshop on RubricsMirtha Insfran
 
Intro to rubric
Intro to rubricIntro to rubric
Intro to rubricsaitjbp
 
Storytelling the Results of Heuristic Evaluation
Storytelling the Results of Heuristic EvaluationStorytelling the Results of Heuristic Evaluation
Storytelling the Results of Heuristic EvaluationUXPA Boston
 

Semelhante a Assessments & Rubrics PD 2.22.13 (20)

Grading Ppt
Grading PptGrading Ppt
Grading Ppt
 
New Syllabus Mathematics Seminar 5 Oct
New Syllabus Mathematics Seminar 5 OctNew Syllabus Mathematics Seminar 5 Oct
New Syllabus Mathematics Seminar 5 Oct
 
Building your assessments to meet course objectives -detc
Building your assessments to meet course objectives -detcBuilding your assessments to meet course objectives -detc
Building your assessments to meet course objectives -detc
 
Rating scales Chapter 7 by Ahmet YUSUF
Rating scales Chapter 7  by Ahmet YUSUFRating scales Chapter 7  by Ahmet YUSUF
Rating scales Chapter 7 by Ahmet YUSUF
 
Summary (chart)
Summary (chart)Summary (chart)
Summary (chart)
 
Pepeke Henua Presentation
Pepeke Henua PresentationPepeke Henua Presentation
Pepeke Henua Presentation
 
Nj model curriculum
Nj model curriculumNj model curriculum
Nj model curriculum
 
Rubrics
RubricsRubrics
Rubrics
 
Standards Driven Classroom Checklist
Standards Driven Classroom ChecklistStandards Driven Classroom Checklist
Standards Driven Classroom Checklist
 
Australian Animals
Australian AnimalsAustralian Animals
Australian Animals
 
Web quest-template-pdf-format1371
Web quest-template-pdf-format1371Web quest-template-pdf-format1371
Web quest-template-pdf-format1371
 
Test construction edited
Test construction editedTest construction edited
Test construction edited
 
High school rubrics
High school rubrics High school rubrics
High school rubrics
 
Wordyslides withnotes amlit_btsngradeslides
Wordyslides withnotes amlit_btsngradeslidesWordyslides withnotes amlit_btsngradeslides
Wordyslides withnotes amlit_btsngradeslides
 
Assessing assessments - Leadership Portfolio Presentation
Assessing assessments - Leadership Portfolio PresentationAssessing assessments - Leadership Portfolio Presentation
Assessing assessments - Leadership Portfolio Presentation
 
Sw5 literacy hub
Sw5 literacy hubSw5 literacy hub
Sw5 literacy hub
 
Storytelling: Rhetoric of heuristic evaluation
Storytelling: Rhetoric of heuristic evaluationStorytelling: Rhetoric of heuristic evaluation
Storytelling: Rhetoric of heuristic evaluation
 
Paratesol Workshop on Rubrics
Paratesol Workshop on RubricsParatesol Workshop on Rubrics
Paratesol Workshop on Rubrics
 
Intro to rubric
Intro to rubricIntro to rubric
Intro to rubric
 
Storytelling the Results of Heuristic Evaluation
Storytelling the Results of Heuristic EvaluationStorytelling the Results of Heuristic Evaluation
Storytelling the Results of Heuristic Evaluation
 

Assessments & Rubrics PD 2.22.13

  • 1. Designing Assessments & Rubrics Aligned to Our Units of Study
  • 2. Learning Outcomes Connections to previous PD Criteria for quality common assessments & effective scoring guides Collaborative planning session to: Create a quality common assessment (with a scoring guide) to accurately infer student needs & curricular next steps Plan appropriately matched learning tasks that will lead up to the developed assessment
  • 3. Code of Cooperation Suspend certainty What happens in Vegas... Listen as an ally Speak from awareness Celebrate diversity Mind the schedule _________________________
  • 4. Connections to Prior Work • Unwrapping the Standards • Designing Curricular Units • Levels of Bloom’s • Artisan Teacher
  • 6. Two Major Types of Assessments Selected Response Constructed Response Note: Performance-based assessments can be used to enable students to physically demonstrate their understanding.
  • 7. Assessment Type Activity In your groups, create a visual representation of the pros and cons of the type of assessment titled on your chart paper. When your group is finished post the chart paper on an accessible wall. When all groups are finished, we will conduct a gallery walk. Discuss with your group any interesting findings or the similarities/differences between the group work. Share out with the whole group.
  • 8. Selected-Response Item Guidelines Align with ‘unwrapped’ standards Higher-order objectives Application of knowledge vs. recall Include new material - a true test of transfer Be brief and clear Use language that asks for the ‘best’ answer as opposed to the ‘correct’ answer Use distractors which are all plausible
  • 9. Constructed-Response Item Guidelines Items are open-ended Require students to create a response Students demonstrate an integrated understanding Items match the level of rigor Scoring guide required Note: Constructed-response items provide for more valid inferences concerning student level of mastery.
  • 10. A Bucket of Trouble An East Indian folk tale tells of two frogs on a farm that had the misfortune of jumping into a pail of fresh milk left by a careless son of the farmer. The frogs were unable to jump out of the pail and had no recourse but to paddle continuously around in the milk in order to stay afloat. The larger of the two finally gave up and sank beneath the white waves, while the other frog kept on, determined to keep on paddling as long as he had breath in his little body. At last, thoroughly exhausted and unable to swim another stroke, he began to sink to his demise, only to find himself resting upon something solid beneath him. With one final exertion, he jumped from the large pad of butter that he had churched by his incessant paddling out of the milk pail to freedom.
  • 11. Creating Questions Use the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy question stems to generate questions that could be used on a common assessment with a focus on the following standard: CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RL.1.2 Retell stories, including key details, and demonstrate understanding of their central message or lesson
  • 12. Sample Selected-Response Question: Level 4: DRAW (inferences, conclusions, generalizations) This tale best illustrates which one of the following generalizations: a. Danger can show up in the most ordinary places. b. Events sometimes take a surprising turn if you refuse to quit. c. Everyone fails some of the time.
  • 13. Sample Constructed-Response Question: Level 5: SUPPORT (inferences, conclusions with text evidence) Extended Response Write one paragraph defending your answer choice for the above multiple-choice question. State your choice and three examples to support it from the tale. Write a concluding sentence that summarizes and supports your answer choice.
  • 14. Assessment Criteria of he level Results are analyzed to Matc hed to t rigor guide instruction Objec tive sc Blended assessments const oring gui ructed d provide more -respo es for nse comprehensive data
  • 15. Steps to Designing a Unit Assessment Determine the Reference the specific Reference Bloom’s For selected-response assessment format to ‘unwrapped’ priority upon Taxonomy and begin questions, make all of the achieve the purpose which to base the assessment writing items distractors plausible Develop learning experiences which are Limit the total number of Create a scoring guide Be sure to include correct congruent to the questions so that student for constructed-response standard terminology priority standard and work can be scored quickly items lead up to the unit e.g., identify, not label; Grades K-1, five or six assessment rotation, not turn Grades 2-3, eight to ten Grades 4-5, ten to twelve
  • 16. Key Elements of Scoring Specific, measurable, observable, student-friendly language Samples matched to criteria Scoring guides help ALL students Criteria provided before task succeed! Student access during task Criteria used to evaluate student work after task
  • 17. Steps to Designing a Scoring Guide Create criteria by Determine performance Begin with criteria for the Write the elements as referring to details of the levels (4-5) “goal” level verb phrases assessment task e.g. “identifies the attributes of one main character in the story” T Obje he result Apply the same criteria ctive : Create the criteria for the Create the criteria for the quic rubr for the final or “not yet” k&a ics f top level progressing level c or level scori curate ng! e.g. “identifies the e.g. Include only one e.g. Include only one attributes of two main criterion that reads, criterion that reads, characters in the story, “meets ______ of the Goal “meets fewer than ______ of noting similarities & criteria” (quantity based the Goal criteria”; and differences between on the number of criteria “task to be repeated after them” for the goal level reteaching”
  • 18. Sample Constructed-Response Question: Level 5: SUPPORT (inferences, conclusions with text evidence) Extended Response Write one paragraph defending your answer choice for the above multiple-choice question. State your choice and three examples to support it from the tale. Write a concluding sentence that summarizes or supports your answer choice.
  • 19. A Bucket of Trouble Sample Scoring Guide: Advanced: Meets all “Goal” criteria plus Includes more than one reason for why the selected choice is better than other two choices Includes real-life connections or experiences in support of selected choice Goal States answer choice Supports answer choice with reason why selected choice is better than other two choices Writes one paragraphs Writes concluding sentence that summarizes or supports answer choice Progressing Meets 2-3 of the Goal criteria Beginning Meets fewer than 2 of the Goal criteria
  • 20. A Bucket of Trouble Sample Scoring Guide: Progressing Beginning Criteria Advanced (4) Proficient (3) (2) (1) Drawing Selects the correct Conclusions answer Provides more than 3 Supporting examples to support Provides 3 examples Provides 2 examples Provides 1-2 examples answer choice; from the text to from the text to that may not support Evidence Includes real-life support answer choice support answer choice evidence from the text connections to text Writes 1 or more Writes 1 paragraph Writes less than a Writes less than a Concluding paragraphs with a with a concluding paragraph that includes paragraph that does not concluding sentence sentence to a concluding sentence to include a concluding Summarization to summarize/support summarize/support summarize/support sentence to summarize/ answer choice answer choice answer choice support answer choice
  • 21. Developing Learning Criteria for developing learning experiences to lead up to the common assessment: Engaging Congruent Increasing in thinking, skill, and rigor
  • 22. Learning Task Read Goldilocks At your tables use Bloom’s Revised to create learning tasks (activities & products) for 4 of the 6 levels on the provided chart paper Discuss whole group
  • 23.
  • 24. Reflective Planning Create a common assessment based on an upcoming unit of study (use the ‘unwrapping’ organizer to guide questions) Develop a scoring guide for constructed-response questions (rubistar/4teachers.org) Plan 3-4 engaging learning experiences which are congruent with the created assessment and steadily increase in thinking, skill, and rigor
  • 25. Tying It All Together Artisan Connections Share Out Revised +/∆ What’s Next
  • 26. What’s Next? Gwen will plan to meet with each grade level during the month of March to discuss your progress and gain insight into the process. It is expected that each grade level will have taught the designed learning experiences, administered the common assessment, utilized the developed rubrics to score the assessment, and collaboratively analyzed the data to inform instructional next steps.