Assignment: Evidence-Based Practice Model and Change Model Create a PowerPoint presentation that addresses each of the following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the questions for each bullet point. Use clear headings that allow your professor to know which bullet you are addressing on the slides in your presentation. Support your content with at least three (3) sources using APA citations throughout your presentation. Make sure to cite the sources using the APA writing style for the presentation. Include a slide for your references at the end. Follow best practices for PowerPoint presentations related to text size, color, images, effects, wordiness, and multimedia enhancements. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment. Identify an evidence based practice model and change model that has been defined in Chapters 13 and 14 of the textbook (Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt, 2015). Describe in detail how you would utilize the practice model and change model to implement an evidence-based practice change in your clinical practice environment, related to your research topic. Title Slide (1 slide) Objective Slide (1 slide) Identify an evidence-based practice model and change model that has been defined in Chapters 13 and 14 of the textbook (Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt, 2015). (2-3 slides). Describe in detail how you would utilize the practice model and change model to implement an evidence-based practice change in your clinical practice environment, related to your research topic. (6-8 slides) References (1 slide) Assignment Expectations: Length: 8-14 slides Structure: Include a title slide, objective slide, content slides, reference slide in APA format. Title/Objective/Reference slides do not count towards the minimum slide count for this assignment. References: Use appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. A minimum of three (3) scholarly sources are required for this assignment. Rubric: This assignment uses a rubric for scoring. Please review it as part of your assignment preparation and again prior to submission to ensure you have addressed its criteria at the highest level. This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Criteria Does Not Meet 0%Approaches 60%Meets 70%Exceeds 100% Content Weight: 40%0 points Article is not from a peer-reviewed journal. Analysis paper does not address assignment requirements. 24 points Paper provides little detail and minimal analysis of the topic, lacks some of the requirements of the assignment. 28 points Article is evaluated and provides sufficient attention to detail and analysis of the topic. Paper adequately addresses all of the requirements of the assignment. 40 points In-depth analysis evident; outstanding clarity and explanation of concepts is demonstrated in information presente.

1. Assignment:
Evidence-Based Practice Model and Change Model
Create a PowerPoint presentation that addresses each of the
following points/questions. Be sure to completely answer all the
questions for each bullet point. Use clear headings that allow
your professor to know which bullet you are addressing on the
slides in your presentation. Support your content with at least
three (3) sources using APA citations throughout your
presentation. Make sure to cite the sources using the APA
writing style for the presentation. Include a slide for your
references at the end. Follow best practices for PowerPoint
presentations related to text size, color, images, effects,
wordiness, and multimedia enhancements. Review the rubric
criteria for this assignment.
Identify an evidence based practice model and change model
that has been defined in Chapters 13 and 14 of the textbook
(Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt, 2015). Describe in detail how
you would utilize the practice model and change model to
implement an evidence-based practice change in your clinical
practice environment, related to your research topic.
Title Slide (1 slide)
Objective Slide (1 slide)
Identify an evidence-based practice model and change model
that has been defined in Chapters 13 and 14 of the textbook
(Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt, 2015). (2-3 slides).
Describe in detail how you would utilize the practice model and
change model to implement an evidence-based practice change

2. in your clinical practice environment, related to your research
topic. (6-8 slides)
References (1 slide)
Assignment Expectations:
Length: 8-14 slides
Structure: Include a title slide, objective slide, content slides,
reference slide in APA format. Title/Objective/Reference slides
do not count towards the minimum slide count for this
assignment.
References: Use appropriate APA style in-text citations and
references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. A
minimum of three (3) scholarly sources are required for this
assignment.
Rubric: This assignment uses a rubric for scoring. Please review
it as part of your assignment preparation and again prior to
submission to ensure you have addressed its criteria at the
highest level.
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first
column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if
the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Criteria
Does Not Meet 0%Approaches 60%Meets 70%Exceeds 100%
Content Weight: 40%0 points
Article is not from a peer-reviewed journal. Analysis paper does
not address assignment requirements.

3. 24 points
Paper provides little detail and minimal analysis of the topic,
lacks some of the requirements of the assignment.
28 points
Article is evaluated and provides sufficient attention to detail
and analysis of the topic. Paper adequately addresses all of the
requirements of the assignment.
40 points
In-depth analysis evident; outstanding clarity and explanation of
concepts is demonstrated in information presented; approaches
assignment with depth and breadth, without redundancy, using
clear and focused details.
40 / 40Logic/Critical Thinking Weight: 25%0 points
Demonstrates little or no critical thinking for the claims and
thoughts within paper; analysis is weak or illogical and is not
supported by evidence.
15 points
Demonstrates some critical thinking although there is a lack of
logical reasoning for the claims and thoughts within the paper;
analysis may be superficial. Some evidence is not effective in
revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.
17.5 points
Demonstrates critical thinking and logical reasoning for the
analysis within the paper. Evidence reveals patterns,
differences, or similarities in the articles.

4. 25 points
Demonstrates exemplary use of critical thinking and logical
reasoning for the analysis within the paper. Synthesizes
evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or
similarities in the articles.
25 / 25Organization Weight: 15%0 points
Organization is confusing and interferes with reader’s ability to
follow ideas. Weak or no introduction. Conclusion lacks a
summary, or is missing or irrelevant.
9 points
Ideas are sometimes disorganized or irrelevant; flow is
sometimes choppy. Basic introduction is presented in an
uninteresting way. Conclusion contains basic summary without
final concluding ideas, and/or may inappropriately introduce
new information.
10.5 points
Structures ideas in a coherent, organized order that has good
flow and an obvious framework. Proficient introduction that is
interesting and states topic. Conclusion contains acceptable
summary with credible concluding ideas and introduces no new
information.
15 points
Exceptionally clear, logical, and sophisticated organization
permitting smooth flow of ideas; introduction grabs interest of
reader. Excellent concluding summary with succinct and precise
ideas that impact reader.