1. Emma Beemer
Diana Onco
NATIVE AMERICAN
STUDENTS & FIRST-YEAR
PROGRAMS
2. OVERVIEW
Introduction
History of First-Year Programs
History of Native Student Success
Present state of Native Americans and First-Year
Programs
University of Arizona, First-Year Scholars Program
Future trends
Conclusion
3. INTRODUCTION
Over 500 Native American
communities
13% of Native Americans
complete degree
Overall goal is to retain a
freshman into sophomore
year
How are First-Year Programs
beneficial
4. WHAT ARE FIRST YEAR PROGRAMS?
Found at col leges and universities
Who is involved?
New Student Orientation
Residence Halls
Academic Advising
First-Year Seminar Course
What do they learn?
Management skills
Study skllls
Financial management
5. FIRST FRESHMAN COUNSELORS
Beginning during
medieval times
1640: Harvard University
Graduate Student and/or
tutors
Asked to counsel and to
become friends with
freshman
6. FIRST FRESHMAN ADVISORS
1665: President Chauncy of
Harvard
Strict admission requirements
Faculty claimed freshman were not
prepared for col lege.
More faculty - freshman
interactions brought better
relationships
Faculty helped diminish severs
initiations on campus
1889: Board of Freshman Advisors
7. FIRST FRESHMEN RESIDENCE HALLS
1914: Harvard University
Chaos among rival secret
societies
Freshman residence hall is
built
Increase of social activities
8. FIRST FRESHMAN ORIENTATION
COURSES
1920s: Literature with advice
for freshman is publ ished
Problems of the 1920-1930s:
Curriculum
Time management
Financial management
Student activities
Difficulty adjusting to college
Solutions:
Counseling
orientation
9. HISTORY OF NATIVE AMERICAN HIGHER
EDUCATION
Harvard: religion and
education
Convert the Native
American tribes
Class of 1665: Caleb
Cheeshahteaumuck
Dartmouth: served both
English and Native
American students
10. TRIBAL COLLEGES
Ethnocentric education leads
to tribal colleges and
universities (TCUs)
1965: Higher Education Act
1972: Indian Education Act
1975: Indian Self-
Determination and Education
Assistance Act
Dine College: First tribal
college
11. HISTORY OF NATIVE AMERICAN STUDENT
SUCCESS
Preserve cultural practices
Higher education =
economic and social
development
42% of Native Americans
pursue higher education
How have First -Year
Programs assisted in the
academic success of Native
American students?
12. PRESENT
From 1988-1997 the retention rate of Native
American students has changed very little with an
average of 45% (Wells, 1997)
“More than half of those who leave before graduation
do so in their first year (Wells, 1997).”
Key Factors:
Insufficient academic preparation
Financial problems
Personal and/or family difficulties
Adjusting to university lifestyle
13. PRESENT
Based on the 1997 research by Rober t Wells, there were 17
out of 30 institutions that repor ted having some level of
suppor t for Native American student such as orientation
programs, counseling, advising, attendance, career
development, and financial aid services (1997, p. 4)
17. English 101 and 102 courses had one course for
each level to enroll Native American students.
Other courses included:
History
Chemistry
Algebra
“Courses in Common”
Study hall
LEARNING
18. LIVING
The Native American population at UofA was 1.2% in
1989 and has increased to 2.7% in 2009.
“The wing’s resident headcount grew from 15
students in 2000 to 45 students by 2003 (2013)
20. SOCIAL AND COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES
Fall Activities
Welcome and Orientation with
family
Family Weekend: includes
BBQ and Football game
Hiking trips
Spring Activities
Service- learning projects that
include local tribal
communities
End-of-Year Celebration
21. FUTURE TRENDS
Growth of First-Year
programs and Native
American students
Struggles in financing and
sustaining such programs
continues to be an issue
Retention rates are
increasing because of
university dedication
22. CONCLUSION
First year programs and their
evolution through history
The approach to suppor ting
students in education
Native American students and
their history in education
Figuring out which model
works best
Reflecting on best practices
Notas do Editor
There are over 500 Native American communities in the United States, most are in very remote areas where higher education is not easily accessible. It is important that the American Indians who pursue a college degree make it to graduation. 42% of Native Americans have pursued some kind of higher education, but only 13% have successfully earned a Bachelor’s degree. First year experience programs are common among most universities, offering resources and guidance to freshmen with the goal of freshmen to sophomore retention as well as overall academic success. In this presentation we will be looking at first year programs and how this could be beneficial to the success of the native American student.
First year programs can be found at most American colleges and Universities and are designed to assist students in successfully transitioning from high school to college. There are several programs and departments that encompass first year programs: New Student Orientation, Residence Halls, Academic Advising, and First Year Seminar Courses. Throughout the first year, students learn and develop time management skills, study skills, and financial management skills just to name a few, as well as learning how to get involved at their university, network with professors and other faculty, and utilize resources at their university to succeed. Studies have shown that when a student knows and feels connected to their university, they are more likely to be academically successful.
The story of first year programs starts back in medieval times. Students would leave for university between the ages of 13 and 16, find a boarding house, and start “shopping” for a Master of Arts that he wanted to learn from. He would also be trying to get initiated into a society of scholars. This initiation included severe hazing by upperclassmen and ended with a celebration feast paid for by the first year student. This feast was usually very expensive and left the student with little money. Students would often write home asking for more money. From the 13th to the 21st century, I guess some things never change!
The first American freshmen were at Harvard University in 1636. The first master, or professor, was Nathanial Eaton. Students would live in the home of his wife and be taught lessons by Eaton. Since this was the first class, there were no upperclassmen to haze the freshmen. However, Eaton’s wife made life unbearable in the boarding house and Eaton would often flog his students for disciplinary measures. In 1640, Eaton and his wife were dismissed and Henry Dunster, Harvards first “real” president took office.
Shortly after taking office, Dunster changed the curriculum to ‘one subject per day, and by rational procedure’. To supplement this new curriculum, he hired tutors and/or graduate students to look out for their younger counterparts. By asking these graduate students and tutors to be friends and counselors to the freshmen, Harvard developed the first system of freshmen counselors, an important aspect of current day first year programs.
In 1655, President Chauncey of Harvard increased freshman admission requirements to include writing and speaking Latin and Greek, as well as reading and understanding classical literature. This change caused faculty to eventually claim that freshmen were not properly prepared for college work. Even more explanations could be made for poor freshman performance: extracurricular activities (such as sports and politics) and even hazing and acts of servitude demanded of the freshmen by the upperclassmen. The hazing and servitude was accepted by Harvard through the creation of “The College Customs”, which was read by upperclassmen to the freshmen every year. However, with increasing demands of students in the 1770’s, the freshmen began having more access to faculty. This increased freshmen-faculty relations and in turn, the faculty were able to reduce the enforcement of the traditions. Around 1889, A Board of Freshman Advisors was formed at Harvard, which aimed to help orient and counsel students in their first year.
Exclusive societies dominated the thoughts of freshmen in the early 1900’s. Severe rivalries became so intense, that these student organizations developed resistance to investigation. To counteract this chaos, Harvard constructed freshman residence halls in 1914 to bring the focus of college back to academics rather than exclusive memberships. These halls were also meant to offer social activities for freshmen.
Literature giving advice to freshmen about possible dangers of the first year began popping up in the early 1900’s as well. Older students and professors often warned freshmen about getting to close to some people, of temptations such as gambling and dating, and also the dangers of ignoring traditions. Once the topic of freshman students caught the eye of scholars, scrutiny availed. Problems that freshmen experienced were becoming apparent and in the 1920-30’s, were identified as: Curriculum adjustment, influence of older students, time management, financial management, student activities, and difficulties with the transition from home to college. The solutions were determined to be “careful counseling” and “structured orientation programs”. In the mid-1930’s, Yale began dividing up their freshmen into small groups with a faculty member assigned to each group. While these faculty were meant to be curriculum advisors, there is evidence that they also played the role of psychoanalyst, social mentor, task master, and probably heard student confessions one too many times. World War I saw a huge growth in orientation courses addressing topics such as handling adjustment issues, how to study and citizenship.
Today, first year programs are still striving to make the transition from high school to college as smooth as possible for first year students. This successful adjustment is even more important for Native American students.
European settlers inhabited New England in the early 17th century, and brought with them the commitment to religion and education. Harvard College was founded in 1636 as the first higher education institution in North America. In the 1640’s, the English Society for the Propagation of the Gospel among the Natives in New England directed funds to Harvard for American Indian education and acknowledged the importance of education of both English and Indian youth. Unfortunately, only one Native American, Caleb Cheeshahteaumuck of the Class of 1665, lived long enough to receive a Harvard degree until the 1970’s.
Dartmouth College was founded in 1769 as a school for both English and American Indian students. However, in the schools first 200 years, only 19 Native Americans graduated. This changed in 1970, when Dartmouth president John G. Kemeny pledged to refocus Dartmouth’s purpose to its founding purpose, and increase opportunities for Native Americans in higher education.
Harvard and Dartmouth were the first colleges designed for both European and American Indian students. However, these non-native educational systems soon overpowered the education system of the Native people. With the goal of assimilation and acculturation, the use of white standards and values kept Native students from attending higher education programs. Native students were just not interested. Ethnocentric education efforts led to the development of the Tribal Colleges in the 1970’s, to try to increase NA access to higher education.
The Higher Education Act of 1965 provided some assistance in the development of these tribal colleges, followed by the Indian Education act of 1972 and the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act of 1975, all of which helped provide funding to American Indians. The first tribal college, Dine (Dih-neh) College, was founded in 1968 on the Navajo Reservation in Tsaile (Say-Lee), Arizona.
With the development of tribal colleges, Native Americans soon saw an increased interest in education at all levels and the need to preserve their cultural practices and traditions. Tribes are currently in a time of cultural revitalization and nation building, with a drive towards higher education to bring about economic and social development. While there is an increased interest, Native Americans have not seen a high percentage of student success.
The national graduation rate is 59%, while the Native American graduation rate is only 39%. In 2004, only 42% of Native Americans pursued some form of higher education, but only 13% completed a Bachelor’s degree. Historically, Native American cultural values were blamed for the low academic achievement. Typically, if “Native American and Alaska Native students perform below the level of their white counterparts on some measures, the fault is laid at the feet of Native culture and not the schools” (U.S. Department of Education, 2001, p. 5).
Some of the key factors that positively affect Native American student success include
Strong family support
Positive interactions with mentors (e.g.., faculty, advisor, department staff members)
Clear educational goals and personal motivation
Institutional support
Academic preparation
The ability to function bi-culturally. (Ortiz and HeavyRunner, 2003; Inglebret and Pavel, 2007).
So how have first year programs assisted in the academic success of Native American Students?
In referencing data from the present status of Native Americans and the use of first-year programs I will be taking information from the 1990s to today.
From 1988-1997 the retention rate of Native American students has changed very little with an average of 45% (Wells, 1997)
In the research survey entitled, The Native American Experience in Higher Education “More than half of those who leave before graduation do so in their first year.”
Key Factors:
Insufficient academic preparation
Financial problems
Personal and/or family difficulties
Adjusting to university lifestyle
Based on this information, many universities have created and customized their individual programs to address the need for support to Native American students in the first year, and in some cases the 2nd year.
The best approach is giving the students an opportunity to be fully immersed and integrated into the institution.
Most models for retention are based on mainstream values and are not inclusive to the Native American student.
Within Wells’ research he identified 30 higher education institutions that had high proportions of Native American students. From these 30 institutions 17 responded saying they do have some level of support for Native American student such as orientation programs, counseling, advising, attendance, career development, and financial aid services.
In 1995, Sam Minner interviewed 22 Native American students that had attended and later dropped out of their first year in college. One student stated, “It would be nice if we had a place where Indian students could meet and talk. Now, we all go our own ways and never get together. We need a place like this and someone to go to.”
For instance, Northern Arizona University has a program called PEER. Which stands for Providing Encouragement to Empower and Retain Students. This program targets freshman who are in freshman seminar courses. These students are also provided a mentor to guide them through their first year.
From Minner’s research in 1995 this type of program could have helped students who felt lost and discouraged. In his survey one student stated, “What I needed was a friend and helper. If someone would have helped me, I think I might have stayed on campus. No one helped me.”
Arizona State University has created a similar program called the Native American Achievement Program. This program is broken up into NAAP I and NAAP II. This provides students with support in both their freshman and sophomore year. This program is dedicated to those that have received scholarships from the Navajo Nation, White Mountain, and San Carlos Apache Tribes. This program is a direct result of an agreement with the university and the tribes in 1996 and continues today.
In addition, University of Arizona has also created the First-Year Scholars Program. The University of Arizona First-Year Scholars Program is considered a best-practices program. It provides significant amounts of support for freshman students to navigate the university and its services.
The Native American population at UofA was 1.2% in 1989 and has increased to 2.7% in 2009.
The program also included support in freshman composition courses. English 101 and English 102. One course was reserved at both the 101 and 102 level for 20-25 Native American students. The content was designed to reflect a more modern approach to include the students identity and topics that were relevant to their communities and tribal nations. The intended result was to have more engaged students that would be willing to participate in class discussion.
This same model was implemented with history, chemistry, and algebra courses. Students in this First-Year Program were also required to enroll in a “Courses in Common” study hall credit. This allowed staff to monitor the students progress academically before problematic issues arise.
As a part of this program, the Native American Student Affairs further developed programs such as the themed residential wing on campus called, “O’Oodham Ki Wing, which means “The people’s House.” The themed wing grew from 15 to 45 students in a span of three years. Returning scholars were asked to continue to be a part of the program to mentor the new freshman for the following year.
An event that has significant importance to the students in this program is the annual blessing ceremony of the O’Oodham Ki Wing. This ceremony involves a spiritual leader coming to the residential wing to pray and burn either sweetgrass or sage that has been blessed by a medicine man. According to Francis-Begay this is intended to “provide protection, safety, and harmony for the residents (2013).”
Students have often stated that it is a struggles being away from home and that their families experience different levels of anxiety with their children being away at college. The First-Year Scholars Program take many efforts to include families in the first year to make this transition easier. It begins in the fall with a Welcome and Orientation, and a Family weekend where families can attend a bar-be-que and qualify to win football tickets to a University of Arizona game.
In the spring, students participate in a service-learning project that involves a local tribal community. Finally, the End-of-Year Celebration allows families to learn about the student achievements and see highlights of their first year at UofA.
Based on the promising efforts of various colleges and universities the future trend of first-year programs and Native American students looks to be growing. Students are now being supported in their education in ways that were never possible in the past. However, there are struggles that could hinder such progress, like financing. In the research by Francis-Begay it was noted that the program at the University of Arizona was made possible by an agreement between tribes and the university. Tribes and other private entities will always be very important to help sustaining programs such as the First-Year Scholars program. Although retention rates are low in comparison to other minority groups the dedication of large universities to retain Native American students continues to grow. As you can see here, the University of Arizona was able to increase their retention rate to 75.7% from the 1st year to the 2nd year.
First-Year programs originally were created to better support students in higher education and direct a focus on academic success. The approach as to how to do this has changed over time but the primary struggles of a first year college student have relatively remained the same. Initially, the relationship between Native American tribes and higher education was one of assimilation and conversion. Today, universities no longer blame Native American culture for failures in college, but see it as an essential component to help student be successful. Ongoing reflection and reevaluation is necessary for first-year programs to continue to best support Native American first-year students.