2. The Law of Effect
The effects of our actions determine whether we
will repeat them
This is the foundation of behavioral psychology
Here we deliver either:
The previously assessed effective reinforcer…
Or if a mistake is made, a prompt
3. The Prompt Hierarchy
1. Verbal (i.e. repeat SD)
2. Gestural (i.e. point to the correct
stimulus)
3. Partial Physical (i.e. a light nudge on
the elbow)
4. Full Physical (hand over hand)
5. Monitoring Criteria
Two forms of tutor response
1. Reinforcer delivery
2. Correction
Let’s get a better understanding of what
this means…
6. Monitoring Criteria (Reinforcer)
Was the reinforcer delivered immediately?
We aim for < 1 second!
Is the reinforcer effective?
Does the child’s world light up or do they cast it
aside?
Engages with the item for 10-15 seconds
Remember preference can change rapidly, assess
often
This will be discussed in greater detail during MO
lecture
Was the intonation appropriate?
Instead of the neutral SD tone, we want jubilation
We should “throw a party” for independent correct
responses
7. Monitoring Criteria (Reinforcer)
Was social reinforcement paired with
tangible?
Play with your child!
Do not simply hand them their reinforcer, interact
We want to establish ourselves as a learned
reinforcer
Did you use tangible for last trial?
Always end on a correct response
Even if it means more trials
Even if it means relying on a mastered skill
It is important to use tangibles for the last trial
This gives you time to finish data collection
This gives you time to transition into next procedure
8. Monitoring Criteria (Correction)
Was the correction timely?
Typically we wait 3 seconds after SD
This can be procedure dependent
This can be child dependent
After 3 seconds, go into prompt hierarchy
What was the prompt hierarchy?
Allow time for independent responding at all levels
Skipping gestural prompts on manipulative imitation
procedures
Was the child attending to correction?
Similar to delivering the SD, attending is crucial
A correction sans attention is a wasted learning
opportunity
9. Monitoring Criteria (Correction)
Is the correction implemented as written?
Follow the prompt hierarchy
Read procedures carefully, there may be
unique instructions
Was the intonation appropriate?
Continue neutral SD tone
Correction is not synonymous with punishment
Do not use a punishing tone of voice
NO!
10. Monitoring Score Recap
Correction
Timely
Attending
As written
Intonation
Reinforcer
Immediate
Effective
Intonation
Pair social with tangible
Use tangible for last trial
Notas do Editor
Again, this slide is to make the parallel to rat lab and our autism practicum. Then I threw the other stuff in there so as to not say children with autism are rats.
Case coordinators should discuss protocol on prompted responses
Elaborate on what tangible is (during presentation)
I didn’t go into detail about attending because Joe did in his presentation
Attending to stimulus & gestures= important!
It would be good to have examples/video of a “punishing tone” Maybe Joe can demonstrate it in class?