6. Tectonic Evolution Paleogeographic Reconstruction by Dr. Ron Blakey ( [email_address] ) Department of Geology , Box 4099 Northern Arizona University Flagstaff, AZ 86011 http://jan.ucc.nau.edu/~rcb7/nam.html
18. Stratigraphy & Cross Section Diagram from SandRidge Energy, Inc. Presented at Goldman Sachs Global Energy Conference 1/12/2008 EUR 4.0 bcf/well EUR 40.0 bcf/well EUR 7.3 bcf/well EUR 2.0 bcf/well EUR 1.5 bcf/well
19. Stratigraphic Correlation Reed & Strickler, Structural Geology and Petroleum Exploration of the Marathon Thrust Belt, West Texas, 1990
20. Fairway Dimensions Ouachita Play Fairway Ouachita Play Fairway 25 miles 200 miles Caballos Tested 4,800 mcf CAOF Pinon Field 5.1 TCF EUR – 3P Caballos Tested 1,950 mcf 16/64” choke Deep 15,000’ Shallow 3,000’
21. Regional Acreage Play Ouachita Play Fairway Ouachita Play Fairway During the last three years over 1.5 million acres put under lease. However, many leases will turn over during 2009/2010.
22. Pipeline Infrastructure Waha Hub Market Price Point Grey Ranch CO2 Processing ROC Plant CO2 Processing In July 2008, Occidental and SandRidge announced a joint venture to build and operate the Century CO 2 Gas Plant. Combined with existing plants this will allow treating of up to 1.0 Bcf/day by year end 2011. Total cost will be $1.1 billion and includes a 160 mile pipeline. OXY will net an estimated 450 MMCFD of CO 2 for enhanced oil recovery projects.
23. Pinon Field – Sand Ridge Energy Sand Ridge Energy has drilled > 500 new wells in Pinon Field since acquiring the field in 2006. The field currently is producing 300 MMCFPD with plans to increase production when additional gas processing facilities are completed in 2010. Wells are permitted for both Ouachita (8,500’) and sub-thrust Paleozoic tests (12,500’). Area of Sub-thrust Paleozoic Structure
38. Dimple 4600 4700 4500 110 Feet Apparent Thickness 10% Tight Reservoir Sweet Gas Accounts for 1% of Production in Pinon Field Requires Frac Job
39. Dimple – Pinon Field Hyperbolic decline indicates low permeability reservoir with flush production coming from fracture systems induced by fracture stimulation 2.7 BCF EUR 3.5 million cu ft/day 1.2 BCF CUM 2 years
40. Dimple – Pinon Field 1.8 BCF EUR 800 mcf/day 0.2 BCF CUM 2 years
41. Tesnus Sands Dimple Limestone 170 Feet Apparent Thickness Tesnus Sands 350 Foot Interval 10’ – 20’ Sands ` Sweet Gas Accounts for 20% of Production in Pinon Field Requires Frac Job
43. 1 st Caballos 6800 6900 7000 6700 220 Feet Apparent Thickness 10% Sour Gas Contains up to 70% CO 2 (CO 2 concentration drops west to east across field) Accounts for 38% of Production in Pinon Field No Frac Required
44. Gas Analysis – 1 st Caballos - Sour West Ranch #5-2C Sampled Feb-2004
45. Gas Analysis-1 st Caballos - Sour Longfellow 600 #4-2 Sampled Mar-2006
47. 2 nd Caballos 7700 7800 7600 330 Feet Apparent Thickness 10% Sweet Gas (No evidence of CO 2 ) Accounts for 40% of Production in Pinon Field No Frac Required
48. Gas Analysis – 2 nd Caballos - Sweet West Ranch #33-2 Sampled Feb-2004
49. Caballos Chert – Pinon Field Linear decline indicates moderate permeability reservoir resulting from natural fracturing of chert reservoirs involved in the thrust belt Linear decline indicates moderate permeability reservoir resulting from natural fracturing of chert reservoirs involved in the thrust belt 2.6 BCF EUR 1.3 million cu ft/day 1.2 BCF CUM 8.5 years
50. Caballos Chert – Pinon Field 6.1 BCF EUR 10 million cu ft/day 5.5 BCF EUR 6 years
51. Caballos Chert – Pinon Field 7.3 BCF EUR 4.1 million cu ft/day 4.3 BCF CUM 7 years
52. Caballos Chert – Pinon Field 7.8 BCF EUR 2.4 BCF CUM 1.3 million cu ft/day 8 years
53. Caballos Chert – Pinon Field 13.2 BCF EUR 8.8 BCF CUM 4.1 million cu ft/day 13 years
57. Stratigraphy & Cross Section Diagram from SandRidge Energy, Inc. Presented at Goldman Sachs Global Energy Conference 1/12/2008 EUR 4.0 bcf/well EUR 40.0 bcf/well EUR 7.3 bcf/well EUR 2.0 bcf/well EUR 1.5 bcf/well
58. Pinon Field Completions No CO 2 Reported in Ouachita Fields East of Pinon Field 0.2 bcf 1% Sweet 10 Dimple 1.5 bcf 1% Sweet 5 Wolfcamp 2.0 bcf 20% Sweet 125 Tesnus 4.0 bcf 40% Sweet 77 Second Caballos 7.3 bcf 38% 70% CO 2 113 First Caballos EUR/well % of Fieldwide Methane Production Gas # of Wells Formation
59. Pinon Field – Ouachita Facies Analog 300 BCF Cumulative Production 621 Completions 300 MMCF/day As of Oct, 2008
60. Pinon Field – Dimple Structure Simplified w/o faults
61.
62.
63. Thrust Front Strawn Play Thrust Front Strawn Diagram Courtesy of Providence Technologies, Inc.
64.
65. Thrust Front Strawn Fields Pakenham Field (1994) Thrusted Strawn 8,500’ 9 Completions Strawn Limestones are involved in the Ouachita Thrust and are proven highly productive ACU Field (2000) Thrusted Strawn 11,500’ 14 Completions Poulter Field (2004) Thrusted Strawn 10.500’ 11 Completions Newfield #3404 17 MMCF/day On 3D seismic May/2007
66. Thrust Front Strawn – ACU Field 10.2 BCF EUR High initial rate and linear decline indicates excellent permeability reservoirs involved in the thrust belt 7.1 BCF CUM 6.6 million cu ft/day 7 years
67. Thrust Front Strawn – ACU Field 4.5 BCF EUR 4.2 BCF CUM 3.3 million cu ft/day 13 years
68. Thrust Front Strawn – ACU Field 0.9 BCF EUR 1.8 million cu ft/day 0.7 BCF CUM 4 years
69. Thrust Front Wolfcamp Wolfcamp Sands Diagram Courtesy of Providence Technologies, Inc.
70.
71. Wolfcamp – Pakenham Field 1.2 BCF EUR 0.9 BCF CUM 3.3 million cu ft/day 2 years
72. Wolfcamp – Pakenham Field 0.6 BCF EUR 0.4 BCF CUM 1.0 million cu ft/day 2.5 years
73. Wolfcamp – Pakenham Field 2.4 BCF EUR 2.3 BCF CUM 2.0 million cu ft/day 15 years
74. Wolfcamp – Pakenham Field 0.85 BCF EUR 0.6 BCF CUM 1.3 million cu ft/day 10 years
75. Play Summary Average of 10-12 BCF/Well (Ouachita Facies) 4,000’ – 8,500’ Sub-Thrust Ouachita Thrust Fairway Position 3.0 2 1.5 Wolfcamp 30.0 1 30.0 Ellenburger 25.0 1 25.0 Sil-Dev 4.0 1 4.0 Strawn 8.0 2 4.0 Caballos 3.0 2 1.5 Tesnus Well EUR (BCF) Zones/well EUR/interval (BCF) Formation