![[object Object],[object Object]]()
Recomendados
Mais conteúdo relacionado
Último
Último (20)
Destaque
Destaque (20)
Future-Proof Post-Trade Matching for Changing Regulations and Markets
- 1. Future proof post-trade matching Guy Eden, Head of Product Management SIBOS 2011, Toronto Guy Eden
- 7. Changes in scale - equity growth
- 8. Changes in scale - ETF growth
- 10. Risk reduction - 2008
- 11. Risk Reduction
- 12. Risk Reduction
- 13. Risk Reduction
- 14. Risk Reduction
- 15. Risk Reduction - 2011
- 17. Summary
- 18. Summary
- 21. Stand L114
Notas do Editor
- In a fast-moving post-trade environment, financial institutions are often hard-pushed to ensure that their technology can keep up with changing requirements. Changing regulation, increasing volumes across multiple asset classes, and a desire to reduce risk all lead to new requirements for communicating and matching data. In particular, connecting internal systems to external ones, whether post-trade counterparties, CCPs, settlement locations, or other services becomes ever more complex and unpredictable. This presentation will look at what's driving the changes, and discuss more flexible approaches to communication and matching, including real-time matching as opposed to T+1 reconciliation a single-window approach to complex communications Why asset class sometimes really doesn’t matter
- real-time matching as opposed to T+1 reconciliation a single-window approach to complex communications Why asset class sometimes really doesn’t matter
- Known unknowns – regulatory uncertainty, changing trading patterns, risk mitigation All lead to requirements for additional external connectivity, matching & handling of changes of scale Problem needs to be tackled in light of legacy ops.
- Known unknowns – regulatory uncertainty, changing trading patterns, risk mitigation All lead to requirements for additional external connectivity, matching & handling of changes of scale Problem needs to be tackled in light of legacy ops.
- Known unknowns – regulatory uncertainty, changing trading patterns, risk mitigation All lead to requirements for additional external connectivity, matching & handling of changes of scale Problem needs to be tackled in light of legacy ops.
- Known unknowns – regulatory uncertainty, changing trading patterns, risk mitigation All lead to requirements for additional external connectivity, matching & handling of changes of scale Problem needs to be tackled in light of legacy ops.
- real-time matching as opposed to T+1 reconciliation a single-window approach to complex communications Why asset class sometimes really doesn’t matter