A european spatial data infrastructure under construction context, scope and implementation progress of the inspire directive (ICT2010 Networking Session)
Semelhante a A european spatial data infrastructure under construction context, scope and implementation progress of the inspire directive (ICT2010 Networking Session)
A MODEL OF (P-GIS) FOR HYDRAULIC PROTECTION DAMS IN NORTHERN MOROCCOijait
Semelhante a A european spatial data infrastructure under construction context, scope and implementation progress of the inspire directive (ICT2010 Networking Session) (20)
A european spatial data infrastructure under construction context, scope and implementation progress of the inspire directive (ICT2010 Networking Session)
1. A European Spatial Data Infrastructure under Construction Context, Scope and Implementation Progress of the INSPIRE Directive Hugo DE GROOF Directorate-General Environment – Chief Scientist, Research and Innovation Unit European Commission INSPIRE TEAM Eurostat – DG Environment – Joint Research Centre
2.
3.
4.
5. Bringing data together through a Spatial Data Infrastructure Data easily discoverable and accessible to users Like a road infrastructure makes it possible to connect different sites, a spatial data infrastructure makes it possible to connect data located at different sources Easier development of new applications and services Components Institutional framework Data Services Fundamental data sets Technical standards
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12. Environment & Health Assessment of Health Impacts Exposure Data Health Data Socio-economic data Geographical data Environmental data Air Pollution Cancer Cases Directive on Ambient Air Quality “ Atmospheric modelling and measurements of air pollution demonstrate beyond doubt that the pollution emitted in one Member State contributes to measured pollution in other Member States. This shows that individual Member States cannot solve the problems alone and concerted action at the EU scale is required.”
13. Source: GMES BICEPS Report INSPIRE DATA Themes and Air Quality – Impacts information system I- 2 Elevation III – 14 Meteorological geographical features III – 13 Atmospheric conditions II – 2 Landcover III – 18 Habitats and biotopes III – 19 Species distribution III-10 Population distribution — demography III- 6 - Utility and governmental services Etc. III – 7 Environmental Monitoring Facilities III – 13 Atmospheric conditions
16. Risk Management System RISK = HAZARD * Elements at RISK * VULNERABILITY Risk Mitigation strategies & response options Elements at Risk & Vulnerability Hazards Identification Risk Communication - Observations - History of Events and Consequences Monitoring & Surveillance Early Warnings & Forecasts Probability & Process Models Risk Scenarios & Maps
17. Floods Early Warning – Forecast - Impact Assessment Data & Information Requirements Source: GMES BICEPS Report I-8 Hydrography I- 2 Elevation III – 7 Environmental Monitoring Facilities III - 12 Natural Risk Zones III – 14 Meteorological geographical features III – 13 Atmospheric conditions III – 3 Soils III – 4 Land-use II – 2 Landcover III – 18 Habitats and biotopes III – 19 Species distribution III-10 Population distribution — demography III- 6 - Utility and governmental services Etc.
18.
19.
20.
21. Soils Directive Data & Information Requirements Source: GMES BICEPS Report
28. Registers Service Metadata Data Set Metadata Registry Service Discovery Service DT MD DT NS GeoRM layers Application and Geoportals Service Bus InvokeSD Service Transf. Service Spatial Data Set TWG TWG TWG Thematic DS Framework for harmonized DS DT DS View Service Download Service INSPIRE - Architecture Service Layer Data Sources
There are numerous indicator sets available at local, national and international level which contain one or more indicators relevant to environment and health .Eg env ind which measure progress towards a clean and healthy environment (eg air and water quality ) . New indicators for eg chemicals/sust dev under development at Eurostat. Also many examples of health indicators that have been used succesfully in public health arena. Only a few projects though aimed at developing indicator specifcally for monitoring environmental health policy, such as The Environmental Health and Information system of WHO Europe (Eurostat dev. Ind.chemicals for monitoring implementation of new policies on chemicals: index/ impact areas/risk areas) At the moment no shared institutional infrastructure with regard to data-collection available/functioning, although EEA partner in WHO project. . Information about changes in time or between/within- countries may be more important than the absolute levels of the indicators. Thus, comparability of the underlying databases is of the utmost importance. Unfortunately, the indicators in the different sets vary in operational definitions (age, diagnosis), geographical scale and quality. In addition, countries have to report to different organizations on the same issues, but sometime using slightly other indicator definitions. Differences in indicator definitions hampers comparison a n d analysis (eg linking of environment and health indicators which have a different geographical/aggregation level )
How will the strategy be monitored and reviewed? An assessment of the current status of the region and of the environmental impact of human activities including would serve as the foundation for the development of Marine Strategies. On this basis Member States would be required to establish monitoring programmes to review the status of marine ecosystems and the achievement of regional environmental quality objectives selected through suitable indicators. The programmes would: – Be made operational at the latest four years after the date of entry into force of the legal instrument supporting the marine strategy. – Be aggregated on the basis of Marine Regions. – Be subject, where appropriate, to common technical specifications and standardised methods for monitoring at Community level to allow comparability of information. – Build upon complement relevant existing monitoring programmes developed at EU and regional level to ensure consistency between these programmes and avoid duplication of efforts. In particular, synergies would be developed with monitoring efforts under the Common Fisheries Policy (e.g. Fisheries Data Collection Regulation). – Make reporting obligations deriving from these monitoring programmes fully compatible with the Commission’s proposal for a Directive establishing an infrastructure for spatial information in the Community (INSPIRE) of 2004.