1. IASS2005 5-11 September 2005
REASSESSMENT OF LESSONS LEARNED
FROM SHELLS FOR SPATIAL MULTI-
STOREY STRUCTURES
Maria BOSTENARU
Istituto Universitario di Studi Superiori di Pavia
ROSE School
Italy
2. Overview
Introduction
The engineering forms derived from the
nave structure
The engineering forms derived from the
metaphor of the nave
Conclusions
3. Introduction
Lessons re-evaluated in light of new
understanding
– Traditional constructions which behaved in
earthquakes better than modern buildings
– ‚local seismic culture‘
– The urban way of life leaded to these
improvements
– Ex. timber structures
4. The Engineering Forms Derived
from the Nave Structure
dense inhabitation > multi-storey
constructions
Coastal cities: building of naves –
‚industrial‘ work
Timber frame (Lisbon, Messina, Venice,
Ionian islands, Istanbul, Germany, N
France, England)
Ship structure – timber frame
8. The Engineering Forms Derived
from the Metaphor of the Nave
Metaphor of the nave
– Level of the facade
– Level of interior space
France
– Gothic
‚nave structure‘
Frame-infill – bird-cage structure (like timber)
– RC multi-storey structures
skeleton / infill
– seismic codes
– urban texture
10. The Engineering Forms Derived
from the Metaphor of the Nave
Frame and
skeleton in
the 20th century
11. The Engineering Forms Derived
from the Metaphor of the Nave
Sacral and residential programmes
– exchange in architecural language
– exchange in structural language
12. The Engineering Forms Derived
from the Metaphor of the Nave
Arch. Ottokar Uhl
Vienna
15. Conclusions
Urban way of life
– Industrial work
– Dense inhabitation
Adoption of a certain engineering type for multi-storey
construction
Ships withstand lateral forces like waves > good seismic
behaviour of the buildings they inspired
Timber indigenous techniques – engineering skills
The design of spatial structures is like a laboratory
where the possibilities of the new material are
researched
Lessons to be learned for RC