Enviar pesquisa
Carregar
Instructional design reading_quiz
•
2 gostaram
•
923 visualizações
C
crinnaj
Seguir
Denunciar
Compartilhar
Denunciar
Compartilhar
1 de 33
Recomendados
Thinking lausanne
Thinking lausanne
ehelfant
Yalof co13 marshaling resources articulate separate animations
Yalof co13 marshaling resources articulate separate animations
Barbara Yalof
This is a very basic primer I once created to teach a staff of technical writers about instructional design. It was not designed for non-verbal delivery, but it will give you an idea of basic ISD concepts.
Basic Instructional Design Principles - A Primer
Basic Instructional Design Principles - A Primer
Mike Kunkle
503 reading quiz
503 reading quiz
amybass
Instructional Design Project for EdTech 503 Boise State University.
Instructional design postcards
Instructional design postcards
Jennifer Byzewski
A. Shaffer - 503 Reading Quiz
A. Shaffer - 503 Reading Quiz
Allison Shaffer
6321 Instructional Design Project
6321 ID KEMP VS ASSURE
6321 ID KEMP VS ASSURE
rocam98
A review of topics, methods, and theories used as part of the instructional design process.
Visual metaphors of instructional design 503
Visual metaphors of instructional design 503
Steven Poast
Recomendados
Thinking lausanne
Thinking lausanne
ehelfant
Yalof co13 marshaling resources articulate separate animations
Yalof co13 marshaling resources articulate separate animations
Barbara Yalof
This is a very basic primer I once created to teach a staff of technical writers about instructional design. It was not designed for non-verbal delivery, but it will give you an idea of basic ISD concepts.
Basic Instructional Design Principles - A Primer
Basic Instructional Design Principles - A Primer
Mike Kunkle
503 reading quiz
503 reading quiz
amybass
Instructional Design Project for EdTech 503 Boise State University.
Instructional design postcards
Instructional design postcards
Jennifer Byzewski
A. Shaffer - 503 Reading Quiz
A. Shaffer - 503 Reading Quiz
Allison Shaffer
6321 Instructional Design Project
6321 ID KEMP VS ASSURE
6321 ID KEMP VS ASSURE
rocam98
A review of topics, methods, and theories used as part of the instructional design process.
Visual metaphors of instructional design 503
Visual metaphors of instructional design 503
Steven Poast
Idmodels 100210151043-phpapp02
Idmodels 100210151043-phpapp02
Idrus Fitri
Instructional Strategy We can divide models of instructional design broadly into two categories MARCO: Models which concern themselves with the design and planning of an entire module or programme MICRO: Models which concern themselves with the design and planning of an individual lecture or teaching session
6-Instructional Design OK.pptx
6-Instructional Design OK.pptx
MuntholibFmipa
Reading quiz
Reading quiz
Jennifer Genovevo
Selected instructional design models are considered, including ASSURE, Morrison Ross & Kemp, Dick, Carey, and Carey, Delphi, DACUM, and rapid prototyping. Drs. Sharon Smaldino, Gary Morrison, Rob Branch, Walt Dick, and Steve Ross offered quotes to include in this presentation about their models and instructional design.
Comparing Instructional Design Models
Comparing Instructional Design Models
Michael M Grant
Reading quiz cassidy baker
Reading quiz cassidy baker
Cassidy Baker
J clarke using visual organizersto focus on thinking
Jclarke using visual_organizers_to_focus_on_thinking1
Jclarke using visual_organizers_to_focus_on_thinking1
ยุวดี เขียวอยู่
Presenation on learning analytics at Edinburgh, given to LERU meeting in Edinburgh, March 2017
LERU Presentation - March 2017
LERU Presentation - March 2017
Anne-Marie Scott
CAD Wynand
3 1-wesam
3 1-wesam
Wynand Viljoen
formative e-assessment: a scoping study
formative e-assessment: a scoping study
Yishay Mor
Reading quiz2
Reading quiz2
Ashley Hungerford
Presented by the Assessment Research Centre and the Melbourne Centre for the Study of Higher Education Teaching, Assessment and Learning Analytics: Time to Question Assumptions Simon Buckingham Shum Professor of Learning Informatics, and Director of the Connected Intelligence Centre (CIC) University of Technology Sydney When: 11.30 -12.30 pm, Wed. 13 Sep 2017 Where: Frank Tate Room, Level 9, 100 Leicester St, Carlton This will be a non-technical talk accessible to a broad range of educational practitioners and researchers, designed to provoke a conversation that provides time to question assumptions. The field of Learning Analytics sits at the convergence of two fields: Learning (including learning technology, educational research and learning/assessment sciences) and Analytics (statistics; visualisation; computer science; data science; AI). Many would add Human-Computer Interaction (e.g. participatory design; user experience; usability evaluation) as a differentiator from related fields such as Educational Data Mining, since the Learning Analytics community attracts many with a concern for the sociotechnical implications of designing and embedding analytics in educational organisations. Learning Analytics is viewed by many educators with the same suspicion they reserve for AI or “learning management systems”. While in some cases this is justified, I will question other assumptions with some learning analytics examples which can serve as objects for us to think with. I am curious to know what connections/questions arise when these are shared.. Simon Buckingham Shum is Professor of Learning Informatics at the University of Technology Sydney, where he was appointed in August 2014 to direct the new Connected Intelligence Centre. Previously he was Professor of Learning Informatics and an Associate Director at The UK Open University’s Knowledge Media Institute. He is active in the field of Learning Analytics as a co-founder and former Vice President of the Society for Learning Analytics Research, and Program Co-Chair of LAK18, the International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference. Previously he co-founded the Compendium Institute and Learning Emergence networks. Simon brings a Human-Centred Informatics (HCI) approach to his work, with a background in Psychology (BSc, York), Ergonomics (MSc, London) and HCI Design Argumentation (PhD, York). He co-edited Visualizing Argumentation (2003) followed by Knowledge Cartography (2008, 2nd Edn. 2014), and with Al Selvin, wrote Constructing Knowledge Art (2015). He was recently appointed as a Fellow of The RSA. http://Simon.BuckinghamShum.net
Teaching, Assessment and Learning Analytics: Time to Question Assumptions
Teaching, Assessment and Learning Analytics: Time to Question Assumptions
Simon Buckingham Shum
This paper will briefly describe and critique the purpose and what instructional models are followed by process of three selected models: (1) The Dick & Carey Model (2) Kemp Model (3) 3 PD Model. The process description and critique for each model will serve as the foundation and supporting points required for comparison and contrasting process of the models.
Dick & carey instructional design model sabri elamin
Dick & carey instructional design model sabri elamin
Memorial University
To shed light on what are the Learning Outcomes? Why they are important? and how to write well-structured Learning Outcomes?
Learning outcomes what why and how
Learning outcomes what why and how
Shakir Al-Awqati
This publication represents the work of graduate students in the Instructional Design and Technology (IDT) program at George Mason University in Fairfax, Virginia. The learning task involved selecting a constructivist-based pedagogical model or instructional strategy and writing a 2-page pedagogy brief that addresses the 5 Things You Need to Know About this pedagogy or instructional strategy, namely: (1) What is it? (2) How does it work? (3) Who is doing it? (4) How effective is it? (5) What are its implications for instructional design?
5 Things You Should Know About CLE Models and Strategies
5 Things You Should Know About CLE Models and Strategies
Nada Dabbagh
Instructional Technology
6 instructional design
6 instructional design
Leela Subramaniam Leela
Rapid Prototyping and ASSURE Model
Tracy pp1
Tracy pp1
tcastillo1
EDMA 262 - Task 1 Part 2 Week 9
EDMA 262 - Task 1 Part 2 Week 9
EDMA 262 - Task 1 Part 2 Week 9
Nina Dorsa
A model is really the first step in curriculum development. A curriculum model determines the type of curriculum used; it encompasses educational philosophy, approach to teaching, and methodology. The good news is, unless you've been hired to design curriculum, you won't come across many curriculum models. However, it's good for educators to be familiar with the models used in their schools The basic tenet of the dynamic or interactional models of curriculum development is that curriculum development is a dynamic and interactive process which can begin with any curriculum element (Print 1989, Brady 1990). Walkers Model of Curriculum develop by Decker Walker 1971. The proponents of this approach to curriculum development argue that the curriculum process does not follow a lineal, sequential pattern. Dynamic models have emerged from a more descriptive approach to curriculum where researchers have observed the behavior of teachers and developers as they devise curricula. Consequently the analytical and prescriptive approach, the very basis of the objectives and cyclical models, is not prominent in the dynamic models. Platform The three phases of Walker's model are the platform phase, the deliberation phase and the design phase. In the platform phase, platform statements made up of ideas, preferences, points of view, beliefs and values that are held by curriculum developers are recognized. Deliberation When the curriculum developers start discussing on the basis of the recognized platform statements, this is the second stage of deliberation, which is a complex, randomized set of interactions that eventually achieves an enormous amount of background work before the actual curriculum is designed (Print 1989 ). Design In this phase developers make decisions about the various process components (the curriculum elements). Decisions have been reached after extended discussion and compromise by individuals. The decisions are then recorded and these become the basis for a curriculum document or specific curriculum materials.
Dynamic model of curriculum development
Dynamic model of curriculum development
HadeeqaTanveer
Instructional Design and Schools of Thought
Instructional Design and Schools of Thought
buttercup1121
Curriculum Mapping Intro 1 13 10
Curriculum Mapping Intro 1 13 10
fergui
Mais conteúdo relacionado
Semelhante a Instructional design reading_quiz
Idmodels 100210151043-phpapp02
Idmodels 100210151043-phpapp02
Idrus Fitri
Instructional Strategy We can divide models of instructional design broadly into two categories MARCO: Models which concern themselves with the design and planning of an entire module or programme MICRO: Models which concern themselves with the design and planning of an individual lecture or teaching session
6-Instructional Design OK.pptx
6-Instructional Design OK.pptx
MuntholibFmipa
Reading quiz
Reading quiz
Jennifer Genovevo
Selected instructional design models are considered, including ASSURE, Morrison Ross & Kemp, Dick, Carey, and Carey, Delphi, DACUM, and rapid prototyping. Drs. Sharon Smaldino, Gary Morrison, Rob Branch, Walt Dick, and Steve Ross offered quotes to include in this presentation about their models and instructional design.
Comparing Instructional Design Models
Comparing Instructional Design Models
Michael M Grant
Reading quiz cassidy baker
Reading quiz cassidy baker
Cassidy Baker
J clarke using visual organizersto focus on thinking
Jclarke using visual_organizers_to_focus_on_thinking1
Jclarke using visual_organizers_to_focus_on_thinking1
ยุวดี เขียวอยู่
Presenation on learning analytics at Edinburgh, given to LERU meeting in Edinburgh, March 2017
LERU Presentation - March 2017
LERU Presentation - March 2017
Anne-Marie Scott
CAD Wynand
3 1-wesam
3 1-wesam
Wynand Viljoen
formative e-assessment: a scoping study
formative e-assessment: a scoping study
Yishay Mor
Reading quiz2
Reading quiz2
Ashley Hungerford
Presented by the Assessment Research Centre and the Melbourne Centre for the Study of Higher Education Teaching, Assessment and Learning Analytics: Time to Question Assumptions Simon Buckingham Shum Professor of Learning Informatics, and Director of the Connected Intelligence Centre (CIC) University of Technology Sydney When: 11.30 -12.30 pm, Wed. 13 Sep 2017 Where: Frank Tate Room, Level 9, 100 Leicester St, Carlton This will be a non-technical talk accessible to a broad range of educational practitioners and researchers, designed to provoke a conversation that provides time to question assumptions. The field of Learning Analytics sits at the convergence of two fields: Learning (including learning technology, educational research and learning/assessment sciences) and Analytics (statistics; visualisation; computer science; data science; AI). Many would add Human-Computer Interaction (e.g. participatory design; user experience; usability evaluation) as a differentiator from related fields such as Educational Data Mining, since the Learning Analytics community attracts many with a concern for the sociotechnical implications of designing and embedding analytics in educational organisations. Learning Analytics is viewed by many educators with the same suspicion they reserve for AI or “learning management systems”. While in some cases this is justified, I will question other assumptions with some learning analytics examples which can serve as objects for us to think with. I am curious to know what connections/questions arise when these are shared.. Simon Buckingham Shum is Professor of Learning Informatics at the University of Technology Sydney, where he was appointed in August 2014 to direct the new Connected Intelligence Centre. Previously he was Professor of Learning Informatics and an Associate Director at The UK Open University’s Knowledge Media Institute. He is active in the field of Learning Analytics as a co-founder and former Vice President of the Society for Learning Analytics Research, and Program Co-Chair of LAK18, the International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference. Previously he co-founded the Compendium Institute and Learning Emergence networks. Simon brings a Human-Centred Informatics (HCI) approach to his work, with a background in Psychology (BSc, York), Ergonomics (MSc, London) and HCI Design Argumentation (PhD, York). He co-edited Visualizing Argumentation (2003) followed by Knowledge Cartography (2008, 2nd Edn. 2014), and with Al Selvin, wrote Constructing Knowledge Art (2015). He was recently appointed as a Fellow of The RSA. http://Simon.BuckinghamShum.net
Teaching, Assessment and Learning Analytics: Time to Question Assumptions
Teaching, Assessment and Learning Analytics: Time to Question Assumptions
Simon Buckingham Shum
This paper will briefly describe and critique the purpose and what instructional models are followed by process of three selected models: (1) The Dick & Carey Model (2) Kemp Model (3) 3 PD Model. The process description and critique for each model will serve as the foundation and supporting points required for comparison and contrasting process of the models.
Dick & carey instructional design model sabri elamin
Dick & carey instructional design model sabri elamin
Memorial University
To shed light on what are the Learning Outcomes? Why they are important? and how to write well-structured Learning Outcomes?
Learning outcomes what why and how
Learning outcomes what why and how
Shakir Al-Awqati
This publication represents the work of graduate students in the Instructional Design and Technology (IDT) program at George Mason University in Fairfax, Virginia. The learning task involved selecting a constructivist-based pedagogical model or instructional strategy and writing a 2-page pedagogy brief that addresses the 5 Things You Need to Know About this pedagogy or instructional strategy, namely: (1) What is it? (2) How does it work? (3) Who is doing it? (4) How effective is it? (5) What are its implications for instructional design?
5 Things You Should Know About CLE Models and Strategies
5 Things You Should Know About CLE Models and Strategies
Nada Dabbagh
Instructional Technology
6 instructional design
6 instructional design
Leela Subramaniam Leela
Rapid Prototyping and ASSURE Model
Tracy pp1
Tracy pp1
tcastillo1
EDMA 262 - Task 1 Part 2 Week 9
EDMA 262 - Task 1 Part 2 Week 9
EDMA 262 - Task 1 Part 2 Week 9
Nina Dorsa
A model is really the first step in curriculum development. A curriculum model determines the type of curriculum used; it encompasses educational philosophy, approach to teaching, and methodology. The good news is, unless you've been hired to design curriculum, you won't come across many curriculum models. However, it's good for educators to be familiar with the models used in their schools The basic tenet of the dynamic or interactional models of curriculum development is that curriculum development is a dynamic and interactive process which can begin with any curriculum element (Print 1989, Brady 1990). Walkers Model of Curriculum develop by Decker Walker 1971. The proponents of this approach to curriculum development argue that the curriculum process does not follow a lineal, sequential pattern. Dynamic models have emerged from a more descriptive approach to curriculum where researchers have observed the behavior of teachers and developers as they devise curricula. Consequently the analytical and prescriptive approach, the very basis of the objectives and cyclical models, is not prominent in the dynamic models. Platform The three phases of Walker's model are the platform phase, the deliberation phase and the design phase. In the platform phase, platform statements made up of ideas, preferences, points of view, beliefs and values that are held by curriculum developers are recognized. Deliberation When the curriculum developers start discussing on the basis of the recognized platform statements, this is the second stage of deliberation, which is a complex, randomized set of interactions that eventually achieves an enormous amount of background work before the actual curriculum is designed (Print 1989 ). Design In this phase developers make decisions about the various process components (the curriculum elements). Decisions have been reached after extended discussion and compromise by individuals. The decisions are then recorded and these become the basis for a curriculum document or specific curriculum materials.
Dynamic model of curriculum development
Dynamic model of curriculum development
HadeeqaTanveer
Instructional Design and Schools of Thought
Instructional Design and Schools of Thought
buttercup1121
Curriculum Mapping Intro 1 13 10
Curriculum Mapping Intro 1 13 10
fergui
Semelhante a Instructional design reading_quiz
(20)
Idmodels 100210151043-phpapp02
Idmodels 100210151043-phpapp02
6-Instructional Design OK.pptx
6-Instructional Design OK.pptx
Reading quiz
Reading quiz
Comparing Instructional Design Models
Comparing Instructional Design Models
Reading quiz cassidy baker
Reading quiz cassidy baker
Jclarke using visual_organizers_to_focus_on_thinking1
Jclarke using visual_organizers_to_focus_on_thinking1
LERU Presentation - March 2017
LERU Presentation - March 2017
3 1-wesam
3 1-wesam
formative e-assessment: a scoping study
formative e-assessment: a scoping study
Reading quiz2
Reading quiz2
Teaching, Assessment and Learning Analytics: Time to Question Assumptions
Teaching, Assessment and Learning Analytics: Time to Question Assumptions
Dick & carey instructional design model sabri elamin
Dick & carey instructional design model sabri elamin
Learning outcomes what why and how
Learning outcomes what why and how
5 Things You Should Know About CLE Models and Strategies
5 Things You Should Know About CLE Models and Strategies
6 instructional design
6 instructional design
Tracy pp1
Tracy pp1
EDMA 262 - Task 1 Part 2 Week 9
EDMA 262 - Task 1 Part 2 Week 9
Dynamic model of curriculum development
Dynamic model of curriculum development
Instructional Design and Schools of Thought
Instructional Design and Schools of Thought
Curriculum Mapping Intro 1 13 10
Curriculum Mapping Intro 1 13 10
Instructional design reading_quiz
1.
Instructional Design Reading
Quiz by: Chrissy Jarvis
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
![Table of Contents ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()