SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 10
Chrislyn Palmer
Woody Malone
  Molly Ellis
   Mrs. Washington
     Government
      2nd period
   February 8, 2013
United States v. Seeger
WHO was involved in this court
               case?
   Plaintiff
       The United States Supreme Court
   Defendant
       Daniel Seeger
WHAT?
   Daniel Seeger refused to go to war when he was drafted
    by the United States Military, he then claimed it was
    against his, “belief in goodness and virtue for their own
    sakes, and a religious faith in a purely ethical creed.”
   He was arrested and charged with draft-dodging
   He appealed the conviction and claimed this was
    unconstitutional and went against the 1st amendment
   The government then appealed
WHEN?
   The court case took place November 16-17,
    1964 through March 8, 1965
WHERE?

   The event and the Court Case took place in
    New York
WHY?
   Daniel Seeger went against the court because he
    felt like his first amendment was being taken
    away from him
     He claimed that his religious beliefs went against
      going into the military
     He claimed this was unconstitutional
HOW was the decision made?
   Daniel Seeger didn’t claim a supreme being, but
    the Court ruled in his favor and all charges were
    dropped; he didn’t have to go into the military
Ours’ and the Court opinion!
   Court
       Ruled in Daniel Seeger’s favor seeing that the first
        amendment says “freedom of religion”; therefore
        they saw that his religious beliefs were against war
        and he didn’t have to join the draft
   Ours’
       In our opinion we think that the Court made the
        right decision not to send him to the military due to
        his religious beliefs and rule in his favor
Bibliography
   United States v. Seeger

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Destaque

Size quiz for E&P - wireframes
Size quiz for E&P - wireframesSize quiz for E&P - wireframes
Size quiz for E&P - wireframesJulia Kastner
 
Pba 653 marketing module 1
Pba 653 marketing module 1Pba 653 marketing module 1
Pba 653 marketing module 1moligon18
 
Final project for HBS Launching Tech Ventures course
Final project for HBS Launching Tech Ventures courseFinal project for HBS Launching Tech Ventures course
Final project for HBS Launching Tech Ventures courseJulia Kastner
 
Guiadelosbuenosamores
GuiadelosbuenosamoresGuiadelosbuenosamores
GuiadelosbuenosamoresPepa Lopez
 
Eva & Paul Pitch - Fall 2013
Eva & Paul Pitch - Fall 2013Eva & Paul Pitch - Fall 2013
Eva & Paul Pitch - Fall 2013Julia Kastner
 
Bianca mockups for mvp
Bianca mockups for mvpBianca mockups for mvp
Bianca mockups for mvpJulia Kastner
 
Abney and Associates Security 2014 News: Big Returns from Big Data for Security
Abney and Associates Security 2014 News: Big Returns from Big Data for SecurityAbney and Associates Security 2014 News: Big Returns from Big Data for Security
Abney and Associates Security 2014 News: Big Returns from Big Data for Securitylewisfinn
 
5 leviers pour bien commencer le référencement de son site internet - Agence ...
5 leviers pour bien commencer le référencement de son site internet - Agence ...5 leviers pour bien commencer le référencement de son site internet - Agence ...
5 leviers pour bien commencer le référencement de son site internet - Agence ...Keeg-seo
 
Catalogue pour les municipalités 2013
Catalogue pour les municipalités   2013Catalogue pour les municipalités   2013
Catalogue pour les municipalités 2013Julien Voyez
 
Le milieu-buccal-worlllllllllldddddddd
Le milieu-buccal-worllllllllllddddddddLe milieu-buccal-worlllllllllldddddddd
Le milieu-buccal-worllllllllllddddddddZakaria Haroun
 

Destaque (11)

Size quiz for E&P - wireframes
Size quiz for E&P - wireframesSize quiz for E&P - wireframes
Size quiz for E&P - wireframes
 
Pba 653 marketing module 1
Pba 653 marketing module 1Pba 653 marketing module 1
Pba 653 marketing module 1
 
Final project for HBS Launching Tech Ventures course
Final project for HBS Launching Tech Ventures courseFinal project for HBS Launching Tech Ventures course
Final project for HBS Launching Tech Ventures course
 
Guiadelosbuenosamores
GuiadelosbuenosamoresGuiadelosbuenosamores
Guiadelosbuenosamores
 
Sector report agriculture
Sector report   agricultureSector report   agriculture
Sector report agriculture
 
Eva & Paul Pitch - Fall 2013
Eva & Paul Pitch - Fall 2013Eva & Paul Pitch - Fall 2013
Eva & Paul Pitch - Fall 2013
 
Bianca mockups for mvp
Bianca mockups for mvpBianca mockups for mvp
Bianca mockups for mvp
 
Abney and Associates Security 2014 News: Big Returns from Big Data for Security
Abney and Associates Security 2014 News: Big Returns from Big Data for SecurityAbney and Associates Security 2014 News: Big Returns from Big Data for Security
Abney and Associates Security 2014 News: Big Returns from Big Data for Security
 
5 leviers pour bien commencer le référencement de son site internet - Agence ...
5 leviers pour bien commencer le référencement de son site internet - Agence ...5 leviers pour bien commencer le référencement de son site internet - Agence ...
5 leviers pour bien commencer le référencement de son site internet - Agence ...
 
Catalogue pour les municipalités 2013
Catalogue pour les municipalités   2013Catalogue pour les municipalités   2013
Catalogue pour les municipalités 2013
 
Le milieu-buccal-worlllllllllldddddddd
Le milieu-buccal-worllllllllllddddddddLe milieu-buccal-worlllllllllldddddddd
Le milieu-buccal-worlllllllllldddddddd
 

Semelhante a Chrislyn palmer, molly ellis, and woody malone

Briefing a CaseCases are written by lawyers for lawyer.docx
Briefing a CaseCases are written by lawyers for lawyer.docxBriefing a CaseCases are written by lawyers for lawyer.docx
Briefing a CaseCases are written by lawyers for lawyer.docxAASTHA76
 
Argumentative or persuasive essay about First amendment.docx
Argumentative or persuasive essay about First amendment.docxArgumentative or persuasive essay about First amendment.docx
Argumentative or persuasive essay about First amendment.docxwrite12
 
Snyder v phelps general
Snyder v phelps generalSnyder v phelps general
Snyder v phelps generalFredrick Smith
 
Michael hicks, haley kornegay, victoria goff
Michael hicks, haley kornegay, victoria goffMichael hicks, haley kornegay, victoria goff
Michael hicks, haley kornegay, victoria goffMichaelh13
 
Portfolio project 2.0
Portfolio project 2.0Portfolio project 2.0
Portfolio project 2.0Chris Harden
 
DNA Evidence In Supreme Court Cases
DNA Evidence In Supreme Court CasesDNA Evidence In Supreme Court Cases
DNA Evidence In Supreme Court CasesMary Stevenson
 
Case Brief ExampleThis is an example of a well-written c.docx
Case Brief ExampleThis is an example of a well-written c.docxCase Brief ExampleThis is an example of a well-written c.docx
Case Brief ExampleThis is an example of a well-written c.docxDaliaCulbertson719
 

Semelhante a Chrislyn palmer, molly ellis, and woody malone (7)

Briefing a CaseCases are written by lawyers for lawyer.docx
Briefing a CaseCases are written by lawyers for lawyer.docxBriefing a CaseCases are written by lawyers for lawyer.docx
Briefing a CaseCases are written by lawyers for lawyer.docx
 
Argumentative or persuasive essay about First amendment.docx
Argumentative or persuasive essay about First amendment.docxArgumentative or persuasive essay about First amendment.docx
Argumentative or persuasive essay about First amendment.docx
 
Snyder v phelps general
Snyder v phelps generalSnyder v phelps general
Snyder v phelps general
 
Michael hicks, haley kornegay, victoria goff
Michael hicks, haley kornegay, victoria goffMichael hicks, haley kornegay, victoria goff
Michael hicks, haley kornegay, victoria goff
 
Portfolio project 2.0
Portfolio project 2.0Portfolio project 2.0
Portfolio project 2.0
 
DNA Evidence In Supreme Court Cases
DNA Evidence In Supreme Court CasesDNA Evidence In Supreme Court Cases
DNA Evidence In Supreme Court Cases
 
Case Brief ExampleThis is an example of a well-written c.docx
Case Brief ExampleThis is an example of a well-written c.docxCase Brief ExampleThis is an example of a well-written c.docx
Case Brief ExampleThis is an example of a well-written c.docx
 

Chrislyn palmer, molly ellis, and woody malone

  • 1. Chrislyn Palmer Woody Malone Molly Ellis Mrs. Washington Government 2nd period February 8, 2013
  • 3. WHO was involved in this court case?  Plaintiff  The United States Supreme Court  Defendant  Daniel Seeger
  • 4. WHAT?  Daniel Seeger refused to go to war when he was drafted by the United States Military, he then claimed it was against his, “belief in goodness and virtue for their own sakes, and a religious faith in a purely ethical creed.”  He was arrested and charged with draft-dodging  He appealed the conviction and claimed this was unconstitutional and went against the 1st amendment  The government then appealed
  • 5. WHEN?  The court case took place November 16-17, 1964 through March 8, 1965
  • 6. WHERE?  The event and the Court Case took place in New York
  • 7. WHY?  Daniel Seeger went against the court because he felt like his first amendment was being taken away from him  He claimed that his religious beliefs went against going into the military  He claimed this was unconstitutional
  • 8. HOW was the decision made?  Daniel Seeger didn’t claim a supreme being, but the Court ruled in his favor and all charges were dropped; he didn’t have to go into the military
  • 9. Ours’ and the Court opinion!  Court  Ruled in Daniel Seeger’s favor seeing that the first amendment says “freedom of religion”; therefore they saw that his religious beliefs were against war and he didn’t have to join the draft  Ours’  In our opinion we think that the Court made the right decision not to send him to the military due to his religious beliefs and rule in his favor
  • 10. Bibliography  United States v. Seeger