6. Importance of managing
Singapore’s ethnic diversity
Singapore is a multi-racial, multi-cultural and multi-ethnic
society
Prevent history from repeating itself
Security & peace for its citizens
Economic progress and prosperity
Foreign investments
7. The Periodisation
Phase 1(1965-79)
4 official languages
English as the neutral lingua franca-> Bilingual Policy
Presidential Council for Minority Rights (PCMR)
Phase 2(1979-90)
SAP schools
Speak Mandarin campaign
Mendaki
Phase 3(1990-99)
Presidential Council for Religious Harmony (PCRH)
Other self-help groups(SINDA, CDAC & Eurasian Association)
Phase 4(2000-present)
Developing of common space
Rendering support to other races for the develop of cultural elites
8. Managing Singapore’s
ethnic diversity
3 KEY aspects
Building a national identity by instilling a sense of
belonging
Safeguarding the interests of minority groups
Developing common space
10. Multi-racialism
an ideology that promotes a society consisted of various
races, while accepting the different cultural background
written into the Constitution in 1965 upon independence
embedded as the core rationale for many public policies
social cultural differences were simplified into the 3 main
racial group plus one residual (CMIO)
Phase 1
11. Why Multi-racialism?
ensures that every race is treated fairly with no special
rights given to any particular group
self-help groups
celebrate the identity of everyone in Singapore where all
can coexist in harmony
Racial Harmony Day
maintain and strengthen the cultural identities unique to
each race
posters of National Day with the inclusion of representatives
from each ethnic group
Phase 1
12. Multi-racialism
Disadvantages
Individuals coming from mixed heritage
to identify themselves with their father’s or mother’s racial
group or both
Bilingual Policy
Phase 1
13. Common Practices
Cultivating loyalty and national pride
st
in 25 Augu
th
d
Implemente Was formally in
troduced on 3 rd
1966 December 195
9
Phase 1
17. • Gives minority groups a say in the governance
• Safeguard the interests of the minority groups
18. Minority
Self-Help Group
Representation
Pr
e l
M Co side tia
in un n n
or c tia i de il for Sing
(P ity il fo l es nc us
CM Ri r Pr ou io y Rac e
l Multi
R) ght ed d
s
Group C elig on Race
Representation R rm H)
Ha CR
Constituency (P
(GRC)
21. Minority
Representation
2
1 99 l
197 tia
n r
ide il fo
0
Pre s
s 1988 re unc ous
Cou identia P o i
Min n l C elig ony
orit cil for Group R rm H)
(PC y Righ Ha CR
MR ts Representation (P
) Constituency
Scrutinise legislation (GRC)
passed by Parliament
to ensure that there
would be no
discrimination against
minority communities.
Phase 1
http://a2o.nas.sg/a2o/public/html/etc/07_const.htm (Taken from National Archive of
22. 197
0
Presidential
Council for
Minority
Rights
Presidential Council for Minority Rights (PCMR)
- Non-elected government body established in 1970.
- Consists of members from minority racial and religious group
- Ensure that no racial or religious group is disadvantaged as a result
of a law passed in the Parliament.
Phase 1
23. 197
0
Presidential
Council for
Minority
Rights
Phase 1
http://www.pmo.gov.sg/content/pmosite/mediacentre/inthenews/primeminister/2012/July/new_faces_on_presidentialcouncilforminorityrights.htm
24. 197
0
Presidential
Council for
Minority
Rights
To scrutinize most of the bills passed by Parliament to ensure
that they do not discriminate against any racial or religious
community.
Excludes
Phase 1
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential_Council_for_Minority_Rights
25. 197
0
While the Presidential
Council for
President may Minority
Rights
block certain
appointments to
the Council, he
cannot remove a
permanent
member from his
seat.
Phase 1 As at 2011
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential_Council_for_Minority_Rights
26. Minority
Representation
19
Pr 70
es 2
M Co ide 9 l
in un n 19 tia
o c t n r
(P rity il fo ial 1988 ide il fo
CM Ri r s
re unc ous
R) ght P o i
s Group C elig ony
Representation R rm H)
Scrutinise
Constituency Ha CR
legislation passed by (P
(GRC)
Parliament to
ensure that there Every political party
would be no contesting the election
discrimination in a GRC must field at
against minority least one candidate
communities. from the minority
communities. Phase 2
http://a2o.nas.sg/a2o/public/html/etc/07_const.htm (Taken from National Archive of
27. 1988
Group
Representation
Constituency
Group Representation Constituency (GRC)
-At least 1 of the candidates in the team contesting for General Elections must
come from the minority racial communities
- Ensure that the minority racial groups are represented in the Parliament.
-Get around the problem of voting along racial lines
Phase 2
28. 1988
Group
Representation
Constituency
- Another perspective of regrouping…
- Original intent faded, voter’s decision is over shadowed by the
material benefits of Town Councils (1989) and Community
Development Councils (1997).
Phase 2
29. PCMR's advisory role largely lies
within the legislative process,
while the PCRH renders advice on
the exercise of executive power -
Minority restraining order.
Representation
Phase 3
2
19 99 l
Pr
es 70 1
n tia
M Co ide 1988 side il for
in un n re unc ous
o c t P o
(P rity il fo ial i
C elig ony
CM Ri r R rm H)
R) ght Group
s Representation Ha CR
(P
Constituency
Scrutinise legislation (GRC) • Resolve any potential
passed by Parliament religious conflicts.
Every political party
to ensure that there
contesting the election • All leaders of the
would be no
in a GRC must field at major religious groups
discrimination against
least one candidate in Singapore are
minority communities.
from the minority represented in this
communities. Council.
http://a2o.nas.sg/a2o/public/html/etc/07_const.htm (Taken from National Archive of
30. 199
2
Presidential
Council for
Religious
Harmony
Source: MICA
President S R Nathan with members of the Presidential
Council for Religious Harmony at the Istana, 1999. Phase 3
31. 199
2
Presidential
Council for
Religious
Harmony
Phase 3
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maintenance_of_Religious_Harmony_Act
32. 199
2
Presidential
Maintenance of Religious Harmony Act(CHAPTER 167A) Council for
Religious
Harmony
Phase 3
http://statutes.agc.gov.sg/aol/search/display/view.w3p;page=0;query=Id%3A%22546aa4b9-fa79-4dce-bdeb-590ecd9a1409%22%20Status%3Ainforce;rec=0#pr
.
33. Nature and effect of restraining orders
A restraining order made against officials or members of religious group
or institution under section 8(1) may be made for the following
reasons:[10]
Criminal sanctions may be
(a) from addressing orally or in writing any congregation, parish or
group of worshippers or in the eventreligious group or
imposed members of any of a
institution on any subject, topic or theme asorder. specified in the
breach of a restraining may be
order without the prior permission of the Minister;
(b) from printing, publishing, editing, distributing or in any way
assisting or contributing to any publication produced by any religious
group without the prior permission of the Minister; or
(c) from holding office in an editorial board or a committee of a
publication of any religious group without the prior permission of the
Minister.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maintenance_of_Religious_Harmony_Act
34. Sedition Act
criminalizes any act that has a seditious tendency
publication of seditious materials
the utterance of seditious words,
and the importing of seditious material.
a tendency to promote feelings of ill will and hostility between different
races or classes of the population of Singapore
Internal Security Act
allows the Singapore government to investigate security threats like
international terrorism, foreign subversion, espionage and acts of violence
or hatred using race or religion.
confers on the government the right to arrest and preventively detain
individuals without trial for up to two years at a time in certain defined
circumstances under Section 8(1)(a) of the ISA.
controversial because some regard it as a draconian law that curbs civil
liberties
Proponents of the law argue that the ISA is necessary for the city-state to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internal_Security_Act_(Singapore) serious security threats
pre-emptively thwart http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sedition_Act_(Singapore)
36. Single
Raced
1984 1990
1919 1992
Government backed, race based
Intra-racial emotional rapport & support was more effective than a
neutral non-racial national approach
Improve social and economic position in the society
Help less fortunate members of their community to get aid in their
studies or training for jobs
Help Singaporeans to cope and compete with one another on equal
footing
44. PM Goh, 2002b on Self Help Groups
Should remain focused on remedial classes and
programmes to improve the academic standards of their
students
Resist pressures to extend their activities to areas which
are more appropriately addressed by other community
and social service organizations
Principle of partnerships should be applied to all services
where there is no particular need for them to be provided
along racial lines.
45. Self-Help Group
Create common
Sing space (PM
ed
le Race Multi Rac Goh, 1999)
d
Common
C I playing field for
C I all and a
separate
playing field for
M O community
M
O
Phase 4
46. Multi
Raced
Nurture a harmonious society through cross-cultural
education and further contribute to the success of multi-
racial Singapore
Joint effort between community development councils
and the Self Help Groups
Race relations and champion racial harmony initiatives
Phase 4
47. Phase 4
Multi
Raced
http://www.onepeople.sg/about-us/our-history
48. Multi
Raced
Phase 4
http://www.onepeople.sg/about-us/our-history
50. PM Goh, 1999c
Not in Government’s policy to have four overlapped
circles merged into one
Singapore is unique because of its multiracial and
multireligious character
Should preserve this valuable attribute
51. Multi
Raced
http://www.pmo.gov.sg/content/pmosite/mediacentre/inthenews/primeminister/2012/October/race-based_self-
helpgroupsstillhaveimportantrolesayspmlee.m.html
54. Background – in the 1950s and
60s
Diverse collection of people
different languages and cultures.
Widespread student unrest in Chinese
schools
First locally elected government formed an
All-Party Committee in 1956 to look into the
problem of Chinese education
55. Report by the All-party Committee
Emphasized the importance of bilingual
education, and inter-mingling of students from
different language medium schools.
Most of the recommendations from this report
were incorporated into the 1956 White Paper on
Education Policy.
Singapore Education System, taken from
http://libguides.nl.sg/content.php?pid=57257&sid=460807
56. Introduced Bilingualism Policy in
1965
English is the first language
Purposes of Education in Singapore
Economic necessity
Integrate the new nation together
Forges national identity and links
the different ethnic groups
Phase 1
57. Bilingualism policy
Mother tongue language is used to
impart moral values and cultural
traditions of each race
Phase 1
58. Creation of SAP schools in 1979
Reason:
There are many advantages to English being
the language of instruction. Nevertheless,
this has also weakened a new generation of
Singaporeans' command of their mother
tongue and unavoidably, their identification
with their own culture.
Phase 2
59. Speak Good Mandarin Campaign
in 1979
Make Mandarin the main language
amongst the heterogeneous
dialect-speaking Chinese
community
The use of dialects in local media
is still largely banned, and films
and videos in dialects are not
allowed unless they are dubbed
over in Mandarin.
Phase 2
60. Character and Citizenship
Education
Various key programmes such as:
Civics and Moral Education (CME, 1992),
National Education (NE, 1997),
Community Involvement Programme (CIP, 1997)
Social and Emotional Learning (SEL, 2005)
Phase 3 – Phase 4
61. National Education must be a vital component of
our education process…. It is an exercise to
develop instincts that become part of the psyche of
every child. It must engender a shared sense of
nationhood, an understanding of how our past is
relevant to our present and future. It must appeal
to both heart and mind.
8 September 1996 during the Teachers’ Day rally
Phase 3
62. Launch of National Education in
1997
Objectives:
Develop national cohesion
Raise awareness of Singapore’s
recent history as well as the
challenges to and constraints on
the country’s development,
Cultivate in students the instincts
for survival
Instill in them confidence in the
future of the country
Phase 3
63. 6 key NE messages
Singapore is our homeland; this is where we belong.
We must preserve racial and religious harmony.
We must uphold meritocracy and incorruptibility.
No one owes Singapore a living.
We must ourselves defend Singapore.
We have confidence in our future.
Phase 3
65. Opportunities Offered by
Educational Institutions
CCAs in schools
encourages teamwork and
build better bonds
Policy of meritocracy
Every child, regardless of
race or religion, can study
in schools and tertiary
institutions.
67. In year 2010…
The implementation of meritocracy in Singapore
had not been as equitable as it should have
been.
Taken from ‘Singapore Malays: Being Ethnic Minority and Muslim in a Global City-
State’
68. Compulsory Religious Knowledge
In 1982, the government introduced compulsory
religious knowledge classes for upper secondary
students.
This was to ensure Singaporean students did not
lose their values in the face of westernisation and
hedonism.
There were 6 options: Bible Knowledge, Buddhist
Studies, Confucian Ethics, Hindu Studies, Islamic
Religious Studies and Sikh Studies.
Phase 2
69. Compulsory Religious Knowledge
Within 5 years, the government realised that the
program was detrimental to ethnic relations.
The program emphasised differences and
encouraged interaction only within the same faith.
It also contributed to religion revivalism in
Singapore.
The program was abruptly terminated in 1990 and
replaced with Civics and Moral Education.
Phase 2
70. Madrasahs
Madrasah is an Arabic word which means "school".
However, in the present context a madrasah means an
Islamic Religious school.
Historically, the madrasah started like other forms of Islamic
education; the learning of the Quran and Hadith from
individual ulama or the studies of Islam conducted in
mosques.
Its main purpose was to educate an individual on Islamic
religion or various aspects of the religion.
Phase 2
71. Madrasahs
What law does the madrasahs come under?
All the madrasahs come under the Education Act. Under
section 87 and 88 of the Administration of Muslim Law Act,
the control of Muslim Religious Schools shall be vested in
MUIS.
What are the objectives of the madrasahs?
The madrasahs are intended to produce the religious elites
to lead the community on religious matters. The mosque
madrasahs provide basic Islamic education i.e. fardhu ain
to students who attend government schools.
How many madrasahs are there in Singapore?
There are 6 full time madrasahs and 27 part time mosque
madrasahs.
Phase 2
72. Madrasahs
What subjects are taught at the madrasahs?
Madrasahs :The students are taught the various
subjects in Islamic Education and Arabic
Language. Academic subjects such as English,
Maths and Malay Language are also taught in the
madrasahs.
Mosque Madrasahs :The students are taught
basic religious subjects only. Students start to
attend one year after they start secular school.
Phase 2
73. HDB
1980s:
• People had the freedom
to buy and sell their flats 1989:
• Resulted in a higher •Ethnic Integration Policy
concentration of people of introduced
the same race in particular •Puts a limit on the proportion
housing estates of races in every
neighbourhood and block
•Ensures a proportionate
distribution of ethnic groups
in the housing estates
Phase 2
74. HDB
The percentage for Indians and Others
were raised by 2% in March 2010 to better
reflect the population profile of Singapore
Phase 2
75. HDB
●The SPR quota (5 Mar 2010) will be
set at 5% and 8% at the
neighbourhood and block levels
respectively.
Malaysian PRs are excluded from the
quota due to "close cultural
and historical similarities".
Phase 4
77. Inter-Racial and Religious
Confidence Circles
● Each circle represents one community.
● The intention is not for the circles to overlap completely
but to maximise the overlapping of the circles.
● Where the circles overlap, there is a shared common
playing field. Where they do no overlap, there is a playing
field individual to each community.
● This helps to build a harmonious nation out of diversity.
PM Goh (1999)
Phase 3
79. Community Engagement Program
A network of people to help prevent racial & religious conflict
The Community Engagement Programme (CEP) seeks to
strengthen the understanding and ties between people of
different races and religions, and build up our society's skills
and knowledge in coping with emergencies.
Response plans to cope with the shock of a terrorist incident
Through the Community Engagement Programme, the
community will be involved in response plans that will be
activated when a crisis, e.g. a terrorist incident, does occur.
These plans aim to help Singaporeans cope with the shock
and to stay calm and resilient. This will ensure that our society
stays together, and we can continue with our daily lives as
quickly as possible. Phase 4
81. Developing common spaces
People’s Association (PA)
1 July 1960 to promote racial harmony and social cohesion in
Singapore
Umbrella network of 1800 GROs which includes CCCs, 550
RCs, over 100 NCs (neighbourhood committees) 106
community clubs, 5 CDCs, National Youth Council, National
Community Leadership Institute, Outward Bound Singapore and
Water Venture
Phase 1
82. Developing common spaces
Events & programmes by People’s Association (PA)
SoundWaves
PA Talent Season
Gentarasa
Chingay
Phase 4
83. Developing common spaces
Events & programmes by People’s Association (PA)
National Orange Ribbon Celebration
CDC (functions as a local administration of its District, promotes
community bonding and social cohesion)
Ethnic bonding home-stay programme (North East CDC)
"Saturday! Series” (South West CDC)
Phase 4
84. Developing common spaces
National Integration Council (NIC)
set up in April 2009 to promote and foster social integration among
Singaporeans and new immigrants.
Community Integration Fund (CIF)
Singapore Citizenship (SC) Journey
E-Journey
Singapore Experiential Tour
Community Sharing Session
Phase 4
85. Developing common spaces
Nparks Community in Bloom
Launched in May 2005
Avenue for residents to create beautiful roadside gardens to spruce
up their estates
can be found in both public and private housing estates, schools as
well as other organisations, such as hospitals and welfare homes.)
Phase 4
86. Developing common spaces
Shared experiences through National Service (NS)
Compulsory NS introduced in 1967
All able-bodied men upon reaching the age of 18 required to
serve NS
Dual purpose: National defence & promoting interethnic
solidarity
Strengthening of bonds, camaraderie & friendship amongst
people of different cultures, races, religions and walks of life
“sensitive” jobs within SAF closed to Malays VS meritocracy
They say that in NS, everyone… whether Chinese, Malay, Indian or
Eurasian, is of the same colour…deep sun burnt brown!
When they have undergone tough military training together,
they build enduring friendships that last – SM Goh, 2002
Phase 1
87. “We must never put the person in a situation where he
may face a conflict of loyalties. I said in answer to a
question some nearly 2 years ago that it is a difficult
matter to put a Malay-Muslim of deeply religious family
background in charge of a machine-gun. We should
never have to ask this of anyone. For nearly every job,
a person’s race and religion are irrelevant. But in the
security services, because of our contact, we cannot
ignore race and religion in deciding suitability”.
88. In conclusion…
3 key aspects to manage ethnic diversity in Singapore
Building a national identity by instilling a sense of belonging
Safeguarding the interests of minority groups
Developing common space
The issue of ethnicity in Singapore… akin to a time-bomb
or nuclear power generator?
91. How to develop a more sustainable &
meaningful multiracialism…
Greater effort towards building a Singaporean national
identity
Reduce countervailing pulls of race, culture & religion
Commitment of ethnic Chinese to multiracialism
Need to reach out to the other races
92. How to develop a more sustainable
& meaningful multiracialism…
Concerted effort to reduce role of ethnic self-help groups
in socio-economic life. Think national, not ethnic!
Emphasis on civic education & promotion of sustained,
genuine interaction between races
Minimize focus on Malay-Muslim Singaporeans’ loyalty
93. Phase 1(1965-79)
4 official languages
English as the neutral lingua franca-> Bilingual Policy
Presidential Council for Minority Rights (PCMR)
Phase 2(1979-90)
SAP schools
Speak Mandarin campaign
Mendaki
Phase 3(1990-99)
Presidential Council for Religious Harmony (PCRH)
Other self-help groups(SINDA, CDAC & Eurasian Association)
Phase 4(2000-present)
Developing of common space
Rendering support to other races for the develop of cultural elites
In what ways has the government’s management of
ethnic diversity changed or remained the same since
1959?
The Constitution of the Republic of Singapore is the supreme law of Singapore.
RCH celebrated on 21 st july. To commemorate the 1964 racial riots
Bilingual policy-> Every student in school is required to learn English and their ”assigned” mother tongue, which is the language of their associated race.
On 18 January 1966, shortly after Singapore's independence, the President of Singapore appointed a Constitutional Commission helmed by Chief Justice Wee Chong Jin to consider how the rights of racial, linguistic, and religious minorities in the nascent nation should be protected. [9] Singapore had just been ejected from Malaysia, and had experienced an extended period of racial and religious tension resulting from the Maria Hertogh riots. This experience reinforced the need for a multiracial society based on equality among races. [10] The Commission, in its report on 27 August 1966, [11] found that such equality was best protected by giving minority rights equal footing with the fundamental liberties in the Constitution. [12] In addition, it recommended a "Council of State", an advisory body that would inform the Government of the effects its laws would have on minorities. This concept was based on the Kenyan Council of State which was established in 1958 during its phase of transition to African majority rule. [13] The idea of an advisory body which could not significantly impede the legislative agenda was viewed by lawmakers as a promising innovation. In addition, the creation of an advisory council ensuring equal treatment in legislation was very much in line with the idea that, as citizens become increasingly aware of racial and religious issues, national growth will very much depend on an approach to such problems that is not fraught with religious and racial tensions. [14]
In order to remain relevant, several amendments have been made to the Constitution in the 80s and 90s To preserve multi-racialism in Parliament, the Constitution was amended in 1988 to introduce the concept of Group Representation Constituency (GRC) so that Religious harmony is also not taken for granted. In August 1992, the Constitution was amended to provide for a
Money bills Bills that the Prime Minister certifies as affecting "the defence or security of Singapore, or which relate to the public safety, peace or good order of Singapore". Bills that the Prime Minister certifies to be so urgent that any delay in enactment would be detrimental to the public welfare. It has been argued that such exemptions are too wide and may be open to abuse. For instance, it is up to the Speaker to determine whether any bill falls within the definition of a money bill, and once he has certified his opinion on the matter in writing, that is "conclusive for all purposes and shall not be open to question in any court". [72] Moreover, grounds upon which bills may be excluded such as "public safety" and "peace", have been described as "nebulous" with potentially wide definitions that are open to abuse by the government in power. [73] As regards a bill that has been enacted on a certificate of urgency and assented to by the President, the Speaker is required to send the Act of Parliament to the Council as soon as possible for its report, which is then presented to Parliament. [74] However, the Constitution contains no provisions as to any steps that Parliament is required to take to amending the Act if an adverse report is made. [73]
In fact, it does not appear that any person has the power to do so. The door may be open for potential abuse with appointments based on some political agenda rather than merit. The counterpoint is that it is precisely those in power who are best placed to scrutinize bills for illegitimate differentiating measures, because "it is often those with political affiliations who can make the biggest contribution to the discussion; if nothing else, from the folly and error of their past ways".
In order to remain relevant, several amendments have been made to the Constitution in the 80s and 90s To preserve multi-racialism in Parliament, the Constitution was amended in 1988 to introduce the concept of Group Representation Constituency (GRC) so that Religious harmony is also not taken for granted. In August 1992, the Constitution was amended to provide for a
at least one of the MPs in a GRC must be a member of the Malay, Indian or another minority community of Singapore. In addition, it was economical for town councils, which manage public housing estates, to handle larger constituencies. The GRC scheme came into effect on 1 June 1988.
In order to remain relevant, several amendments have been made to the Constitution in the 80s and 90s To preserve multi-racialism in Parliament, the Constitution was amended in 1988 to introduce the concept of Group Representation Constituency (GRC) so that Religious harmony is also not taken for granted. In August 1992, the Constitution was amended to provide for a
Social and political backdrop There were several prevailing social and political conditions in the 1980s which prompted the introduction of the bill. These were detailed in the Maintenance of Religious Harmony white paper. First, there had been an increase in religious fervour and assertiveness among religious groups, which was part of a worldwide religious revival. [59] This had led to an increase in inter-religious tensions. [60] Secondly, intra-religious tensions had also been observed. [61] Thirdly, several incidents had taken place suggesting that religious groups and leaders were entering the realm of politics. [62] [edit] Inter-religious tensions Sri Srinivasa Perumal Temple, a Hindu temple along Serangoon Road Inter-religious tensions were largely attributed to aggressive and insensitive proselytization by religious groups, mostly Protestant churches and organizations. [63] Examples cited in the ISD report annexed to the white paper included tensions in August 1986 when Hindus found posters publicizing a Christian seminar pasted at the entrance to their temple, and when Christian missionaries distributed pamphlets to devotees going into temples along Serangoon Road. [64] There were also two disputes in July 1988 and January 1989 involving the funerals of non-Muslims who had converted to Islam. The non-Muslim families had wanted to cremate the bodies according to their respective non-Islamic religious rites, but a Muslim organization applied for court orders to claim the bodies and bury them according to Islamic rites. Both these disputes were eventually settled out of court. [65] [edit] Intra-religious tensions Hostility between sub-groups under the same religious umbrella also became apparent in the 1980s. [66] In October 1989, for instance, a Hindu sect called the Shiv Mandir burnt an effigy of Ravana, a Hindu mythological king, during a religious festival. This caused outrage among Tamil Hindus, who wanted to retaliate by staging a protest demonstration and threatened to retaliate by burning the effigy of Lord Ramachandra. [67] Intra-religious tensions among Christian groups surfaced after the distribution of pamphlets and booklets denigrating the Roman Catholic Church and the Pope by some Protestants. [68] [edit] Mixing of religion and politics According to the ISD report, the mid-1980s also saw Catholic priests engaging in social activism and using Catholic religious gatherings and publications as platforms to comment on political issues. [69] Following the arrest of Vincent Cheng and others associated with him and their detention under the Internal Security Act ("ISA"), [70] several priests spoke out against the arrests at masses, describing it as an injustice and an attack on the Church. [71] Several foreign Muslim theologians such as Imaduddin Abdul Rahim, Ahmed Hoosen Deedat and Mat Saman bin Mohamed were banned from entering Singapore after they delivered lectures or speeches inciting the Muslim community in Singapore against the Government. [72]
However, there are also notable differences between the Sedition Act and the MRHA. The first relates to the consequences of violation. Under section 4 of the Sedition Act, an offender is criminally liable. In contrast, under the MRHA, the imposition of a restraining order does not per se carry criminal liability. It is only when this restraining order has been breached that criminal liability will attach to the offender. [106] This difference reflects the varying approach towards disruption of public order – the punitive approach of the Sedition Act contrasts with the pre-emptive approach of the MRHA. Such an arrangement allows the Government to mount a calibrated response against perpetrators. [107] If the Sedition Act was the only relevant statute in operation, it might result in disproportionately harsh action being taken against minor public order disturbances. The second difference relates to the mischief that both statutes address. Tt is clear that the MRHA was meant to address mischiefs of a religious nature. In comparison, the Sedition Act encompasses a broader category of mischief. This is seen in section 3(1)(e), where only hostile actions relating to race and classes of people have a seditious tendency. Whether "classes of people" includes religious groups has yet to be directly commented on by the courts. However, the District Court case Public Prosecutor v. Koh Song Huat Benjamin (2005) [108] suggests that a perpetrator can be charged under the Sedition Act when the acts committed connote anti-religious sentiments. [109] This effectively subsumes the mischief of the MRHA under the Sedition Act.
Chinese educated low income
Play and work together
First government-run Chinese medium school Common school syllabuses Civics was introduced into all schools Under colonial rule separate language medium schools existed and government kept their involvement in education to a minimum. These segregated schools not only prevented students from different racial backgrounds from interacting, they also differed greatly in terms of breadth and depth of instruction and resources. The English medium mission schools and clan supported Chinese medium schools were largely better funded than the Malay medium schools and Tamil medium schools.
National rally 1986…
keep in touch with their heritage and cultural values. http://stupidchicken.com/comic/2006/08/06/chicken-vs-speak-good-english/
inculcate values and build competencies in our pupils to develop them into good individuals and useful citizens.
Many Singaporeans, especially pupils and younger Singaporeans, knew little of our recent history. They did not know how we became an independent nation, how we triumphed against long odds, or how today's peaceful and prosperous Singapore came about. The worry was over whether this lack of knowledge would adversely affect young people‘s commitment to Singapore.
Every child, regardless of race or religion, can study in schools and tertiary institutions. http://ceres.ca.gov/cert/linkages/