Frequently Asserted Franchisee Causes of Action Against Franchisors

CLAIMS BY FRANCHISEES ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

CLAIMS BY FRANCHISEES ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Representing The Other Side? ,[object Object]

FRANCHISEE PERSPECTIVE ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

The Offering Circular ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Offering Circular ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Fraudulent Inducement ,[object Object],[object Object]

“ If a contract was procured by fraud, an integration clause reciting that the written agreement was complete “ would go down the drain with the contract of which it was a part” ,[object Object]

“ No defendant may escape liability for actual fraud through the use of general disclaimers” Healy v. Carlson Travel Network Assocs. (dicta)

Negligent Misrepresentation In Illinois, a defendant is not liable unless it is engaged in the “ business of supplying information ” First Midwest Bank, N.A. v. Stewart Title Co. , 2005 WL 119802 (1 st Dist. 2005) Some courts reject this argument categorically

PROMISSORY FRAUD ,[object Object],[object Object]

STATE FRANCHISE ACTS ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Little FTC Acts ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Little FTC Acts ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

DE FACTO FTC DISCLOSURE OBLIGATION AT COMMON LAW WITH A PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION ,[object Object]

The Franchise Agreement ,[object Object],[object Object]

EXCEPTIONS TO EVERY RULE ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Franchisor’s Interpretation: ,[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],IMPLIED COVENANT OF GOOD FAITH & FAIR DEALING

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],AMBIGUITY

Waiver of Good Faith & Fair Dealing ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Expanding the Contract ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Experts In Franchising ,[object Object],[object Object]

Fiduciary Duties ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

STATE FRANCHISING ACTS ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Discrimination as a Defense to Termination Seventh Circuit: “ discrimination requires proof of “arbitrary disparate treatment among similarly situated individuals or entities.” Canada Dry Corp. v. Nehi Beverage Co., Inc., But this holding is in question.

Terminations ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Terminations ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Good Faith vs. Good Cause ,[object Object]

“ Discourage litigation. Persuade your neighbors to compromise whenever you can. … As a peacemaker the lawyer has a superior opportunity of being a good man. There will still be business enough."

Frequently Asserted Franchisee Causes of Action Against Franchisors

Recomendados

Recomendados

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Mais procurados (20)

Semelhante a Frequently Asserted Franchisee Causes of Action Against Franchisors

Semelhante a Frequently Asserted Franchisee Causes of Action Against Franchisors (20)

Último

Último (20)

Frequently Asserted Franchisee Causes of Action Against Franchisors