![Case Group ,[object Object],Recruit managers and supervisors Monterey, Mexico 8 weeks 8 people Demographics 4 Caucasian men, 2 Caucasian women 1 African-American woman 1 Hispanic woman Ages 30-55 yrs.]()
Recomendados
Mais conteúdo relacionado
Destaque
Semelhante a Group 4
Semelhante a Group 4 (20)
Mais de bstoutamore
Último
Último (20)
Group 4
- 1. Group 4 Kendra Miller Barbara Rochon Jaren Scott Barbara Stoutamore Jason Verba
- 3. The Social Identity Perspective of Small Groups Social Identity Group is part of individual Shared psychological reality (Poole, p. 100) (Poole, p. 102) (Poole, p. 103)
- 4. The Social Identity Perspective of Small Groups Motivation to sustain positive social identity Members sought roles that maximized outcome Proactive concerning conflict within group (Poole, p. 103) (Poole, p. 111)
- 5. The Social Identity Perspective of Small Groups Motivation to sustain positive social identity Conform to group norms Seek meaning in tasks (Poole, p. 113)
- 6. The Network Perspective of Small Groups Communication pattern High-complex tasks developed decentralized communication pattern Low-complex tasks developed centralized communication pattern (Poole, p. 299)
- 7. The Network Perspective of Small Groups Decentralized communication patterns Supervisors assessed groups as having higher production levels Group productivity increased with varied demographic boundaries (Poole, p. 296)
- 8. The Network Perspective of Small Groups Friendship and advice ties are positively associated with group’s perceived effectiveness (Poole, p. 296)
- 9. Conclusion Theories that work best Social Identity Perspective of Small Groups Network Perspective in Small groups
- 10. Reference Poole, M. S. & Hollingshead, A. B. (2005). Theories of small groups: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Sage Publications. Thousand Oaks, CA.