The document discusses establishing a national documentation strategy through the Icon Documentation Network. It outlines reasons for sharing records, such as learning from others and ensuring the longevity of knowledge. Potential barriers to sharing are addressed, like unclear ownership or the cost of sharing. The network could define contribution models, assist members with workflows, build an online portal, and organize local hubs to help smaller contributors. Joining the network would help establish a collaborative infrastructure for sharing documentation.
3. Why share?
●
Sharing means learning, i.e.:
– to share/explain I need to understand first
– sharing improves my knowledge
4. Why share?
●
Sharing means learning
●
Sharing is collaboration, i.e.:
– benefit others and benefit from others
– if I share, others will share, so I will have access to
more knowledge/data
5. Why share?
●
Sharing means learning
●
Sharing is collaboration
●
Sharing ensures legacy, i.e.:
– my knowledge/data will not disappear because
others use it
– support from community-centric infrastructure
6. Why share?
●
Sharing means learning
●
Sharing is collaboration
●
Sharing ensures legacy
●
Sharing ensures attribution, i.e.:
– if I share, I take credit for my work
– I am recognised by my peers
19. Why not to share?
●
You do not own the records
– private collections / contracts
20. Why not to share?
●
You do not own the records
– private collections / contracts
Culture change – highlight benefits
21. Why not to share?
●
You do not own the records
– private collections / contracts
– organisation policies
●
organisation hopes to make money from these records
●
organisation thinks there is high risk for disputes
22. Why not to share?
●
You do not own the records
– organisation policies
●
organisation hopes to make money from these
records
●
organisation thinks there is high risk for
disputes
Culture change – senior management,
transparency
23. Why not to share?
●
You do not own the records
– private collections / contracts
– organisation policies
●
organisation hopes to make money from these records
●
organisation thinks there is high risk of disputes
●
Records are of “bad” quality
– damage organisation's public view
24. Why not to share?
●
Records are of “bad” quality
– damage organisation's public view
Embargo for a fixed period (e.g. 5- 10 years)
25. Why not to share?
●
You do not own the records
– private collections / contracts
– organisation policies
●
organisation hopes to make money from these records
●
organisation thinks there is high risk of disputes
●
Records are of “bad” quality
– damage organisation's public view
●
Sharing is difficult / costly
26. Why not to share?
●
Sharing is difficult / costly
Reduce costs by forming partnerships (e.g.
through ICON)
55. What could ICON do?
●
Define model for contributions
●
Help members with workflow for contributing
data
56. What could ICON do?
●
Define model for contributions
●
Help members with workflow for contributing
data
●
Build and maintain a documentation portal
57. What could ICON do?
●
Define model for contributions
●
Help members with workflow for contributing
data
●
Build and maintain a documentation portal
●
Organise a network of local hubs for
contributions (e.g. to assist smaller museums
and individual conservators)