RDAP 16 Lightning: Quantifying Needs for a University Research Repository System: Carnegie Mellon's Approach to Prioritizing Capabilities and Including Stakeholders

•Transferir como PPT, PDF•

1 gostou•310 visualizações

Research Data Access and Preservation Summit, 2016 Atlanta, GA May 4-7, 2016 Lightning Rounds (Thursday, May 5) Presenter: Ana Van Gulick, Carnegie Mellon University

Educação

Quantifying Needs for a University
Research Repository System:
Carnegie Mellon’s Approach to
Prioritizing Capabilities and Including
Stakeholders
Ana Van Gulick, Ph.D.
CLIR/DLF Postdoctoral Fellow for Data Curation
University Libraries
Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition
@anavangulick
www.library.cmu.edu

Main title Here
Bold text for subheads, Names
Light text body copy
• bulleted items
• bulleted items
• bulleted items
Italics for titles, papers, periodicals
Image: http://www.cclightingdesign.com/portfolio/architecture/hunt-library/
Building the library of the future
Embedded information specialists as
partners in research, teaching, and
learning
Steward the evolving scholarly record,
and champion new forms of scholarly
communication.
Collaborate with peer institutions to
provide coordinated access to a global
collection of information resources.

ALL research products - Output agnostic repository
Products of the full research life cycle

Institutional
Repository
Data &
MORE
Repository
Papers vs Data?

Digital Repository Task Force
DTRF
Liaison
Librarians
Specialist
Librarians
Repository
Specialists
CLIR
Fellows
Archivist
IT &
Developers

Digital Science Partnership
RESEARCH
INFORMATION
SYSTEM
DATA
REPOSITORY
RESEARCH
FUNDING
IMPACT

Integrated Research Support
Image: The Noun Project

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Why would a publisher care about open data?

Anita de Waard

Wilcox - Open Source Repositories and the Future of Fedora

National Information Standards Organization (NISO)

Collaboratively creating a network of ideas, data and software

Anita de Waard

Rusbridge Feb 8 Improving Clarity around Continuing Access

National Information Standards Organization (NISO)

The Rocky Road to Reuse

Anita de Waard

The Scholix Framework and the OpenAIRE Scholexplorer Service (OpenAIRE webina...

OpenAIRE

Optimising Scientific Knowledge Transfer: How Collective Sensemaking Can Ena...

Anita de Waard

RDAP 16: How do we know where to grow? Assessing Research Data Services at th...

ASIS&T

NISO Virtual Conference Scientific Data Management: Caring for Your Instituti...

National Information Standards Organization (NISO)

BioSharing - Update - Feb2016

Susanna-Assunta Sansone

Searching beyond datasets in the Social Sciences

GESIS

January 13, 2016 NISO Webinar: Ensuring the Scholarly Record: Scholarly Retra...

DeVonne Parks, CEM

data.bris - Use case, role and functionality for CKAN adoption

Simon Price

AgriVIVO: A Global Ontology-Driven RDF Store Based on a Distributed Architect...

Valeria Pesce

Data Publishing is becoming an integral part of scholarly communication today. Thus, it is indispensable to understand how data publishing works across disciplines. Are there best practices others can learn from or even data publishing standards? How do they impact interoperability in the Open Science landscape? The presentation will look at a range of examples, and the main building blocks of data publishing today. The work has been conducted as part of the RDA Data Publishing Workflows group.

Data Publishing Models by Sünje Dallmeier-Tiessen

datascienceiqss

White Manipulating Metadata to Enhance Access

National Information Standards Organization (NISO)

Implementing Archivematica, research data network

Jisc RDM

Think like a Digital Curator

DigitalLibraryServices

Persistent identifiers (Pids) provide machine-actionable links to data and metadata that are vital to APIs (application programming interfaces) for publishing and citation. APIs are essentially request/response patterns that use Pids to reference things and metadata to describe not only the things themselves, but also any actions requested or taken. As a result, metadata design and standardization is wedded to API design and enhancement. With Pids as nouns and metadata as adjectives and qualifiers, Pid services play a key role in API implementation.

Persistent Identifier Services and their Metadata by John Kunze

datascienceiqss

Carole Goble presents the FAIRDOM | OSFair2017 Workshop Workshop title: How FAIR friendly is your data catalogue? Workshop overview: This workshop will build upon the work planned by the EOSCpilot data interoperability task and the BlueBridge workshop held on April 3 at the RDA meeting. We will investigate common mechanisms for interoperation of data catalogues that preserve established community standards, norms and resources, while simplifying the process of being/becoming FAIR. Can we have a simple interoperability architecture based on a common set of metadata types? What are the minimum metadata requirements to expose FAIR data to EOSC services and EOSC users? DAY 3 - PARALLEL SESSION 6 & 7

OSFair2017 Workshop | How FAIR friendly is the FAIRDOM Hub? Exposing metadata...

Open Science Fair

Mais procurados (20)

Why would a publisher care about open data?

Wilcox - Open Source Repositories and the Future of Fedora

Collaboratively creating a network of ideas, data and software

Rusbridge Feb 8 Improving Clarity around Continuing Access

The Rocky Road to Reuse

The Scholix Framework and the OpenAIRE Scholexplorer Service (OpenAIRE webina...

Optimising Scientific Knowledge Transfer: How Collective Sensemaking Can Ena...

RDAP 16: How do we know where to grow? Assessing Research Data Services at th...

NISO Virtual Conference Scientific Data Management: Caring for Your Instituti...

BioSharing - Update - Feb2016

Searching beyond datasets in the Social Sciences

January 13, 2016 NISO Webinar: Ensuring the Scholarly Record: Scholarly Retra...

data.bris - Use case, role and functionality for CKAN adoption

AgriVIVO: A Global Ontology-Driven RDF Store Based on a Distributed Architect...

Data Publishing Models by Sünje Dallmeier-Tiessen

White Manipulating Metadata to Enhance Access

Implementing Archivematica, research data network

Think like a Digital Curator

Persistent Identifier Services and their Metadata by John Kunze

OSFair2017 Workshop | How FAIR friendly is the FAIRDOM Hub? Exposing metadata...

Semelhante a RDAP 16 Lightning: Quantifying Needs for a University Research Repository System: Carnegie Mellon's Approach to Prioritizing Capabilities and Including Stakeholders

Libraries, collections, technology: presented at Pennylvania State University...

lisld

Boundless Opportunity

Rachel Frick

Digital Scholarly Communication @Claremont Colleges

Ashley Sanders, Ph.D.

FORCE2019 Research Comms Conference

CarolineByrne17

ALA 2010 -- Jane Burke

bisg

Supporting research life cycle librarians

Sherry Lake

Semantic web technologies and digital library search

Richard Nurse

Researchers Roadmaps Roles Reality Checks

John MacColl

Collection directions - towards collective collections

lisld

Pampel/Bertelnmann/Hobohm: Data Librarianship

Hans-Christoph Hobohm

We used to think of the user in the life of the library. Now we think of the library in the life of the user. As behaviors change in a network environment, we have seen growing interest in ethnographic and user-centered design approaches. This presentation introduces this topic. It also explores changes in how we manage collections as an illustration of this shift towards thinking of the library in the life of the user.

The library in the life of the user

lisld

Collection Directions - Research collections in the network environment

Constance Malpas

OUR space: the new world of metadata

Karen S Calhoun

Fuller Disclosure: Getting More Collections into the Network Flow

kramsey

Keynote: SemSci 2017: Enabling Open Semantic Science 1st International Workshop co-located with ISWC 2017, October 2017, Vienna, Austria, https://semsci.github.io/semSci2017/ Abstract We have all grown up with the research article and article collections (let’s call them libraries) as the prime means of scientific discourse. But research output is more than just the rhetorical narrative. The experimental methods, computational codes, data, algorithms, workflows, Standard Operating Procedures, samples and so on are the objects of research that enable reuse and reproduction of scientific experiments, and they too need to be examined and exchanged as research knowledge. We can think of “Research Objects” as different types and as packages all the components of an investigation. If we stop thinking of publishing papers and start thinking of releasing Research Objects (software), then scholar exchange is a new game: ROs and their content evolve; they are multi-authored and their authorship evolves; they are a mix of virtual and embedded, and so on. But first, some baby steps before we get carried away with a new vision of scholarly communication. Many journals (e.g. eLife, F1000, Elsevier) are just figuring out how to package together the supplementary materials of a paper. Data catalogues are figuring out how to virtually package multiple datasets scattered across many repositories to keep the integrated experimental context. Research Objects [1] (http://researchobject.org/) is a framework by which the many, nested and contributed components of research can be packaged together in a systematic way, and their context, provenance and relationships richly described. The brave new world of containerisation provides the containers and Linked Data provides the metadata framework for the container manifest construction and profiles. It’s not just theory, but also in practice with examples in Systems Biology modelling, Bioinformatics computational workflows, and Health Informatics data exchange. I’ll talk about why and how we got here, the framework and examples, and what we need to do. [1] Sean Bechhofer, Iain Buchan, David De Roure, Paolo Missier, John Ainsworth, Jiten Bhagat, Philip Couch, Don Cruickshank, Mark Delderfield, Ian Dunlop, Matthew Gamble, Danius Michaelides, Stuart Owen, David Newman, Shoaib Sufi, Carole Goble, Why linked data is not enough for scientists, In Future Generation Computer Systems, Volume 29, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 599-611, ISSN 0167-739X, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2011.08.004

The Rhetoric of Research Objects

Carole Goble

A Clean Slate?

Herbert Van de Sompel

Deluca "Building Momentum and Support for Institutional Repository Deposits"

National Information Standards Organization (NISO)

Zudilova-Seinstra-Elsevier-data and the article of the future-nfdp13

DataDryad

Open access (1)

madhuvardhan

Presented at Open Access: Maximising Research Impact, April 23 2009, New Bulgarian University Library, Sofia. Open access for researchers: enlarged audience, citation impact, tenure and promotion. Open access for policy makers and research managers: new tools to manage a university’s image and impact. How to maximize the visibility of research publications, improve the impact and influence of the work, disseminate the results of the research, showcase the quality of the research in the Universities and research institutions, better measure and manage the research in the institution, collect and curate the digital outputs, generate new knowledge from existing findings, enable and encourage collaboration, bring savings to the higher education sector and better return on investment. What are the key functions for research libraries?

Open access for researchers, policy makers and research managers - Short ver...

Iryna Kuchma

Semelhante a RDAP 16 Lightning: Quantifying Needs for a University Research Repository System: Carnegie Mellon's Approach to Prioritizing Capabilities and Including Stakeholders (20)

Libraries, collections, technology: presented at Pennylvania State University...

Boundless Opportunity

Digital Scholarly Communication @Claremont Colleges

FORCE2019 Research Comms Conference

ALA 2010 -- Jane Burke

Supporting research life cycle librarians

Semantic web technologies and digital library search

Researchers Roadmaps Roles Reality Checks

Collection directions - towards collective collections

Pampel/Bertelnmann/Hobohm: Data Librarianship

The library in the life of the user

Collection Directions - Research collections in the network environment

OUR space: the new world of metadata

Fuller Disclosure: Getting More Collections into the Network Flow

The Rhetoric of Research Objects

A Clean Slate?

Deluca "Building Momentum and Support for Institutional Repository Deposits"

Zudilova-Seinstra-Elsevier-data and the article of the future-nfdp13

Open access (1)

Open access for researchers, policy makers and research managers - Short ver...

Mais de ASIS&T

RDAP 16: Sustaining Research Data Services (Panel 2: Sustainability)

ASIS&T

RDAP 16: Sustainability of data infrastructure: The history of science scienc...

ASIS&T

RDAP 16: DMPs and Public Access: Agency and Data Service Experiences

ASIS&T

RDAP 16: Perspective on DMPs, Funders and Public Access (Panel 5: DMPs and Pu...

ASIS&T

RDAP 16: DMPs and Public Access: An NIH Perspective (Panel 5, DMPs and Public...

ASIS&T

RDAP 16: If I could turn back time: Looking back on 2+ years of DMP consultin...

ASIS&T

RDAP 16: Data Management Plan Perspectives (Panel 5, DMPs and Public Access)

ASIS&T

RDAP 16 Poster: Challenges and Opportunities in an Institutional Repository S...

ASIS&T

RDAP 16 Poster: Interpreting Local Data Policies in Practice

ASIS&T

RDAP 16 Poster: Measuring adoption of Electronic Lab Notebooks and their impa...

ASIS&T

RDAP 16 Poster: Responding to Data Management and Sharing Requirements in the...

ASIS&T

RDAP 16 Lightning: Spreading the love: Bringing data management training to s...

ASIS&T

RDAP 16 Lightning: RDM Discussion Group: How'd that go?

ASIS&T

RDAP 16 Lightning: Data Practices and Perspectives of Atmospheric and Enginee...

ASIS&T

RDAP 16 Lightning: Working Across Cultures: Data Librarian as Knowledge Broker

ASIS&T

RDAP 16 Lightning: Personas as a Policy Development Tool for Research Data

ASIS&T

RDAP 16 Lightning: Growing Data in Utah: A Model for Statewide Collaboration

ASIS&T

RDAP 16: Building Without a Plan: How do you assess structural strength? (Pan...

ASIS&T

RDAP 16: I built it. They came. Now what? (Panel 2, Sustainability)

ASIS&T

RDAP 16: Building Sustainable Services at the Small(er) Scale (Panel 4, Measu...

ASIS&T

Mais de ASIS&T (20)