Enviar pesquisa
Carregar
Chapter 7
•
Transferir como PPT, PDF
•
2 gostaram
•
1,183 visualizações
A
asciacca
Seguir
Constitutional Law
Leia menos
Leia mais
Educação
Denunciar
Compartilhar
Denunciar
Compartilhar
1 de 27
Baixar agora
Recomendados
Chapter 8
Chapter 8
Chapter 8
glickauf
Search Warrants
Search Warrants
CTIN
Ch 15 Search and Seizure
Ch 15 Search and Seizure
rharrisonaz
There are ground rules to Search & Seizure. The 4th Amendment protects you from “unreasonable search and seizures.” The police may stop a vehicle when they have reasonable suspicion to believe a traffic offense has been committed, but they must follow certain rules. If you suspect the police overstepped their constitutional authority during your search, and it was unlawful, you should consult an attorney to discuss your legal options.
Search and seizure ground rules
Search and seizure ground rules
James Publishing
Fourth Amendment
Fourth Amendment
Fourth Amendment
lisajurs
Fourth Amendment notes
Fourth Amendment notes
Jennifer Vogt-Erickson
Fourth amendment
Fourth amendment
bayotr
4th amendment
4th amendment
robbie59
Recomendados
Chapter 8
Chapter 8
Chapter 8
glickauf
Search Warrants
Search Warrants
CTIN
Ch 15 Search and Seizure
Ch 15 Search and Seizure
rharrisonaz
There are ground rules to Search & Seizure. The 4th Amendment protects you from “unreasonable search and seizures.” The police may stop a vehicle when they have reasonable suspicion to believe a traffic offense has been committed, but they must follow certain rules. If you suspect the police overstepped their constitutional authority during your search, and it was unlawful, you should consult an attorney to discuss your legal options.
Search and seizure ground rules
Search and seizure ground rules
James Publishing
Fourth Amendment
Fourth Amendment
Fourth Amendment
lisajurs
Fourth Amendment notes
Fourth Amendment notes
Jennifer Vogt-Erickson
Fourth amendment
Fourth amendment
bayotr
4th amendment
4th amendment
robbie59
4th amendment
4th amendment
AaronChisholm
Lesson 33
Lesson 33
Dschulties288
Chapter 5 overview
Chapter 5 overview
sevans-idaho
State of Louisiana v Sonny Barker_Objective Memo_FINAL_11_30_14
State of Louisiana v Sonny Barker_Objective Memo_FINAL_11_30_14
Joni Schultz
Week 5 Lecture
Week 5 Lecture
sevans-idaho
Fourth amendment tutorial
Fourth amendment tutorial
Casarellan
Ch10
Ch10
icebergslim1996
Discussion of Jurisdiction of Article 136 of Constitution of India Why, where and when to approach Supreme Court Right of litigant after judgment passed by High Court
Why where and when
Why where and when
Ronak Karanpuria
Lesson 31
Lesson 31
guest6aeccb
Chapter 9 lecture notes, videos, and websites
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 9
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 9
mpalaro
The Criminal Process 2
The Criminal Process 2
thorogl01
This is a comparative study on the concept of illegally obtained evidence between Malaysia, United Kingdom, United States of America and the concept from Islamic Perspective.
Illegally obtained evidence
Illegally obtained evidence
NurulHayyu1
Chapter 10 lecture notes, videos, and websites
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 10
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 10
mpalaro
Ch 18 Criminal Trial
Ch 18 Criminal Trial
rharrisonaz
What do you need to know as a result?
Changes to the ACT Coroner Act
Changes to the ACT Coroner Act
Russell_Kennedy
Basic Search and Seizure Presentation State of Arkansas Clay.Smith255@yahoo.com
Introduction to 4th search and seizure Arkansas
Introduction to 4th search and seizure Arkansas
Clay Smith
From arrest to appeal,
Trial procedures
Trial procedures
Mark Lushenko
The Sixth Amendment: Right to Counsel and a Fair Trial
Chapter 11 - The Sixth Amendment: Right to Counsel and a Fair Trial
Chapter 11 - The Sixth Amendment: Right to Counsel and a Fair Trial
lisajurs
Law and Justice Chapter 6 power point
Chapter 6 power point
Chapter 6 power point
mckenziewood
Lesson 31
Lesson 31
guest6aeccb
Lesson 31
Lesson 31
wemo14
Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889, 44 O.O.2d 383 © 2016 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 1 KeyCite Yellow Flag - Negative Treatment Not Followed on State Law Grounds State v. Lopez, Hawai’i, May 16, 1995 88 S.Ct. 1868 Supreme Court of the United States John W. TERRY, Petitioner, v. STATE OF OHIO. No. 67. | Argued Dec. 12, 1967. | Decided June 10, 1968. Prosecution for carrying concealed weapon. The Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County, Ohio, overruled pretrial motion to suppress and rendered judgment, and defendant appealed. The Court of Appeals for the Eighth Judicial District, 5 Ohio App.2d 122, 214 N.E.2d 114, affirmed, the Ohio Supreme Court dismissed an appeal on ground that no substantial constitutional question was involved, and certiorari was granted. The Supreme Court, Mr. Chief Justice Warren, held that police officer who observed conduct by defendant and another consistent with hypothesis that they were contemplating daylight robbery, and who approached, identified himself as officer, and asked their names, acted reasonably, when nothing appeared to dispel his reasonable belief of their intent, in seizing defendant in order to search him for weapons, and did not exceed reasonable scope of search in patting down outer clothing of defendants without placing his hands in their pockets or under outer surface of garments until he had felt weapons, and then merely reached for and removed guns. Affirmed. Mr. Justice Douglas dissented. West Headnotes (34) [1] Constitutional Law Fourth Amendment Fourth Amendment is made applicable to states by Fourteenth Amendment. U.S.C.A.Const. Amends. 4, 14. 228 Cases that cite this headnote [2] Searches and Seizures Persons, Places and Things Protected Right of personal security belongs as much to citizen on streets as to homeowner closeted in his study to dispose of his secret affairs. U.S.C.A.Const. Amend. 4. 86 Cases that cite this headnote [3] Common Law Principles and maxims No right is held more sacred, or is more carefully guarded, by common law, than right of every individual to possession and control of his own person, free from all restraint or interference unless by clear and unquestionable authority of law. 80 Cases that cite this headnote [4] Searches and Seizures Fourth Amendment and reasonableness in general Constitution forbids not all searches and seizures but unreasonable searches and seizures. U.S.C.A.Const. Amend. 4. 344 Cases that cite this headnote [5] Searches and Seizures Persons, Places and Things Protected Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889, 44 O.O.2d 383 © 2016 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 2 Defendant was entitled to protection of Fourth Amendment as he walked dow ...
Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d .docx
Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d .docx
mehek4
Mais conteúdo relacionado
Mais procurados
4th amendment
4th amendment
AaronChisholm
Lesson 33
Lesson 33
Dschulties288
Chapter 5 overview
Chapter 5 overview
sevans-idaho
State of Louisiana v Sonny Barker_Objective Memo_FINAL_11_30_14
State of Louisiana v Sonny Barker_Objective Memo_FINAL_11_30_14
Joni Schultz
Week 5 Lecture
Week 5 Lecture
sevans-idaho
Fourth amendment tutorial
Fourth amendment tutorial
Casarellan
Ch10
Ch10
icebergslim1996
Discussion of Jurisdiction of Article 136 of Constitution of India Why, where and when to approach Supreme Court Right of litigant after judgment passed by High Court
Why where and when
Why where and when
Ronak Karanpuria
Lesson 31
Lesson 31
guest6aeccb
Chapter 9 lecture notes, videos, and websites
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 9
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 9
mpalaro
The Criminal Process 2
The Criminal Process 2
thorogl01
This is a comparative study on the concept of illegally obtained evidence between Malaysia, United Kingdom, United States of America and the concept from Islamic Perspective.
Illegally obtained evidence
Illegally obtained evidence
NurulHayyu1
Chapter 10 lecture notes, videos, and websites
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 10
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 10
mpalaro
Ch 18 Criminal Trial
Ch 18 Criminal Trial
rharrisonaz
What do you need to know as a result?
Changes to the ACT Coroner Act
Changes to the ACT Coroner Act
Russell_Kennedy
Basic Search and Seizure Presentation State of Arkansas Clay.Smith255@yahoo.com
Introduction to 4th search and seizure Arkansas
Introduction to 4th search and seizure Arkansas
Clay Smith
From arrest to appeal,
Trial procedures
Trial procedures
Mark Lushenko
The Sixth Amendment: Right to Counsel and a Fair Trial
Chapter 11 - The Sixth Amendment: Right to Counsel and a Fair Trial
Chapter 11 - The Sixth Amendment: Right to Counsel and a Fair Trial
lisajurs
Mais procurados
(18)
4th amendment
4th amendment
Lesson 33
Lesson 33
Chapter 5 overview
Chapter 5 overview
State of Louisiana v Sonny Barker_Objective Memo_FINAL_11_30_14
State of Louisiana v Sonny Barker_Objective Memo_FINAL_11_30_14
Week 5 Lecture
Week 5 Lecture
Fourth amendment tutorial
Fourth amendment tutorial
Ch10
Ch10
Why where and when
Why where and when
Lesson 31
Lesson 31
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 9
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 9
The Criminal Process 2
The Criminal Process 2
Illegally obtained evidence
Illegally obtained evidence
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 10
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 10
Ch 18 Criminal Trial
Ch 18 Criminal Trial
Changes to the ACT Coroner Act
Changes to the ACT Coroner Act
Introduction to 4th search and seizure Arkansas
Introduction to 4th search and seizure Arkansas
Trial procedures
Trial procedures
Chapter 11 - The Sixth Amendment: Right to Counsel and a Fair Trial
Chapter 11 - The Sixth Amendment: Right to Counsel and a Fair Trial
Semelhante a Chapter 7
Law and Justice Chapter 6 power point
Chapter 6 power point
Chapter 6 power point
mckenziewood
Lesson 31
Lesson 31
guest6aeccb
Lesson 31
Lesson 31
wemo14
Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889, 44 O.O.2d 383 © 2016 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 1 KeyCite Yellow Flag - Negative Treatment Not Followed on State Law Grounds State v. Lopez, Hawai’i, May 16, 1995 88 S.Ct. 1868 Supreme Court of the United States John W. TERRY, Petitioner, v. STATE OF OHIO. No. 67. | Argued Dec. 12, 1967. | Decided June 10, 1968. Prosecution for carrying concealed weapon. The Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County, Ohio, overruled pretrial motion to suppress and rendered judgment, and defendant appealed. The Court of Appeals for the Eighth Judicial District, 5 Ohio App.2d 122, 214 N.E.2d 114, affirmed, the Ohio Supreme Court dismissed an appeal on ground that no substantial constitutional question was involved, and certiorari was granted. The Supreme Court, Mr. Chief Justice Warren, held that police officer who observed conduct by defendant and another consistent with hypothesis that they were contemplating daylight robbery, and who approached, identified himself as officer, and asked their names, acted reasonably, when nothing appeared to dispel his reasonable belief of their intent, in seizing defendant in order to search him for weapons, and did not exceed reasonable scope of search in patting down outer clothing of defendants without placing his hands in their pockets or under outer surface of garments until he had felt weapons, and then merely reached for and removed guns. Affirmed. Mr. Justice Douglas dissented. West Headnotes (34) [1] Constitutional Law Fourth Amendment Fourth Amendment is made applicable to states by Fourteenth Amendment. U.S.C.A.Const. Amends. 4, 14. 228 Cases that cite this headnote [2] Searches and Seizures Persons, Places and Things Protected Right of personal security belongs as much to citizen on streets as to homeowner closeted in his study to dispose of his secret affairs. U.S.C.A.Const. Amend. 4. 86 Cases that cite this headnote [3] Common Law Principles and maxims No right is held more sacred, or is more carefully guarded, by common law, than right of every individual to possession and control of his own person, free from all restraint or interference unless by clear and unquestionable authority of law. 80 Cases that cite this headnote [4] Searches and Seizures Fourth Amendment and reasonableness in general Constitution forbids not all searches and seizures but unreasonable searches and seizures. U.S.C.A.Const. Amend. 4. 344 Cases that cite this headnote [5] Searches and Seizures Persons, Places and Things Protected Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889, 44 O.O.2d 383 © 2016 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 2 Defendant was entitled to protection of Fourth Amendment as he walked dow ...
Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d .docx
Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d .docx
mehek4
C H A P T E R 4 Arrest and Stop under the Fourth Amendment Because the strongest advocates of Fourth Amendment rights are frequently criminals, it is easy to forget that our interpretations of such rights apply to the innocent and the guilty alike. —JUSTICE THURGOOD MARSHALL, United States v. Sokolow, 490 U.S. 1, 11 (1989) 171 CHAPTER OUTLINE OVERVIEW OF THE LAW OF PERSONAL DETENTION Arrests and Investigative Stops Detention to Investigate Detention and Search during the Execution of a Search Warrant ARREST Arrest and Police Discretion Consequences of Arrest Defining a Fourth Amendment Seizure and Arrest Probable Cause to Arrest The Use of Force THE ARREST WARRANT REQUIREMENT Arrest in Public Arrest in the Home Arrests and Searches in Third-Party Homes SEARCH INCIDENT TO ARREST The Scope of a Search Incident to Arrest The Protective Sweep Exception Searching at the Station House STOP AND FRISK Establishing the Constitutional Authority to Stop The Sources of Reasonable Suspicion Terry on the Streets Terry on the Road Terry in Tight Places Terry at the Airport: Drug Stops and Drug Courier Profiles Terry and Canine Detection Cases LAW IN SOCIETY: DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND ARREST Changing Norms and Domestic Violence Laws Impediments to Change: Police Discretion and Domestic Violence The Minneapolis Experiment and the Replication Experiments Mandatory Arrest: Policies, Polemics, and Findings Mandatory Arrest: Empirical Studies Conclusion SUMMARY LEGAL PUZZLES JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT: STALWART CONSERVATIVES, 1938–1962: REED, VINSON, BURTON, MINTON, AND WHITTAKER Stanley F. Reed Fred M. Vinson Harold Burton Sherman Minton Charles E. Whittaker KEY TERMS arrest arrest warrant body cavity search booking brevity requirement bright-line rule class action citizen’s arrest companion case custodial arrest custody drug courier profile false arrest field interrogation “fleeing felon” rule frisk fusion centers illegal arrest in personam jurisdiction in-presence rule M04_ZALM7613_06_SE_CH04.QXD 1/11/10 5:21 PM Page 171 G A R R E T T , M E G A N 1 3 2 4 T S OVERVIEW OF THE LAW OF PERSONAL DETENTION Even a routine arrest—physically detaining a person—is a drastic event. For some people being arrested, even when justifiably, is psychologically traumatic. For the police officer, a routine de- tention may quickly escalate into a life-threatening episode, although firearms are not used in 99.8 percent of all arrests. Only 5.1 percent of arrests involve the use or display of weapons of any type. Indeed, in 84 percent of all arrests, police use no tactics at all—the arrestees simply submit.1 Nevertheless, all seizures of people are, by law, forcible detentions in that they are not consensual. Arrests and Investigative Stops A police detention of a person can be lawful or illegal. Because liberty has priority in American political theory and constitutional law, all detentions by government officers ...
C H A P T E R 4Arrest and Stopunder the FourthAmendment.docx
C H A P T E R 4Arrest and Stopunder the FourthAmendment.docx
RAHUL126667
Criminalistics DB1 Name Class Date Professor Criminalistics DB1 The United Sates Supreme Court has long established the need for law enforcement to obtain a search warrant before searching or seizing evidence. In Mincey v. Arizona and the Michigan v. Tyler the Supreme Court established the need for a search warrant when conducting searches at crimes scenes but there are exceptions to this rule (O’Connor, 2012). Police have several circumstances when a warrantless search may be conducted in one instance if there are exigent circumstances police can seize evidence without a warrant. If police believe the evidence is at threat to be destroyed they can seize the evidence without a warrant. If it is later determined their where no exigent circumstances the evidence could be excluded. Police can also conduct warrantless searches if they have permission to search or if the evidence at the scene is on plain view to the police officer. For example if police arrive at a crime scene and notice a package of drugs sitting on a table by the window they can enter the premises and seizes the drugs because they were left in plain view. When it comes to the crime scene, however, police are restricted in their actions. Police could size evidence in a warrantless search is they chase a police suspect into a building and then search the suspect and locate contraband. The chase must be continuous, however. If the chase from the police does not begin and end continuously, meaning there are stops between the chase, the warrantless search is no longer legal and any evidence will be thrown out. In another scenario police can enter a crime scene and seize evidence if police believe a criminal might escape if police do not make immediate entry or if the police believe the criminal suspect poses a danger to society (Corrigan, 2013). If police do not have information that allows them to reasonably believe the suspect poses a threat to society they cannot conduct the warrantless search. Police officers walk a fine line when they conduct the warrantless search and must have a reasonable belief the evidence at the crime scene could be lost or other exigent circumstances could come into play. If police officers have any question on whether or not they should conduct a warrantless search they should wait and get a warrant. References Corrigan, B. (2013). The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution. Retrieved August 19, 2014 from http://www.texascrimelaw.com/Warrantless-Searches.html O’Connor, T. (2012). Search and Seizure Guide: Rules, tests, Doctrines, and Exceptions. Retrieved August 19, 2014 from http://www.drtomoconnor.com/3020/3020lect02a.htm Legal Issues Criminalistics IP1 Name Class Date Professor Legal Issues and Constraints at Crime Scene The crime scene yields important evidence pointing to the events surrounding the crime and pointing to the responsible party. Physical evidence is considered the .
Criminalistics DB1NameClassDateProfessor.docx
Criminalistics DB1NameClassDateProfessor.docx
faithxdunce63732
Chapter 7 lecture notes, videos, and websites
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 7
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 7
mpalaro
C H A P T E R 3 Essential Fourth Amendment Doctrines 105 CHAPTER OUTLINE THE SEARCH WARRANT Search Warrant Values: A Neutral and Detached Magistrate Obtaining a Search Warrant Particularity The Intersection of the First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments Anticipatory Warrants and Controlled Deliveries Challenging a Search Warrant Affidavit Executing a Search Warrant: Knock and Announce Inventory and Delayed Notice; “Sneak and Peek” Warrants Deadly Errors REVOLUTIONIZING THE FOURTH AMENDMENT Modernizing Search and Seizure Law Creating the “Expectation of Privacy” Doctrine Applying the “Expectation of Privacy” Doctrine Undercover Agents and the Fourth Amendment PROBABLE CAUSE AND THE FOURTH AMENDMENT The Concept of Evidence Sufficiency Defining Probable Cause Probable Cause Based on Informers’ Tips Conservative Revisions PLAIN VIEW AND RELATED DOCTRINES Plain View Curtilage and Open Fields Airspace Enhancement Devices CONSENT SEARCHES Voluntariness Requirement Knowledge of One’s Rights Third-Party Consent Scope of Consent “Knock and Talk” LAW IN SOCIETY: POLICE PERJURY AND THE FOURTH AMENDMENT SUMMARY LAW PUZZLES JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT: ROOSEVELT’S LIBERALS: DOUGLAS, MURPHY, JACKSON, AND RUTLEDGE William O. Douglas Frank Murphy Robert H. Jackson Wiley B. Rutledge Power is a heady thing; and history shows that the police acting on their own cannot be trusted. And so the Constitution requires a magistrate to pass on the desires of the police before they violate the privacy of the home. —JUSTICE WILLIAM O. DOUGLAS, McDonald v. United States, 335 U.S. 451, 456 (1948) M03_ZALM7613_06_SE_CH03.QXD 1/11/10 3:03 PM Page 105 R O D D Y , A N T H O N Y I S A A C 3 7 2 7 B U 106 Chapter 3 KEY TERMS anticipatory warrant beeper consent search constitutionally protected area controlled delivery curtilage enhancement device exigency ex parte expectation of privacy industrial curtilage inventory and return “knock and announce” rule magistrate media ride-along neutral and detached magistrate no-knock warrant open fields plain feel rule plain view plurality opinion probable cause reasonable suspicion secret informant “sneak and peek” warrant telephonic warrant thermal imaging two-pronged test undercover agent This chapter presents five basic areas of Fourth Amendment law: (1) the search warrant, (2) the ‘expectation of privacy’ doctrine, (3) probable cause, (4) the plain view doctrine, and (5) consent searches. Although in practice most searches are conducted without a warrant (i.e., are “warrant- less”), the Fourth Amendment presumes that judicial search warrants are essential for preserving the privacy protections of the people. The expectation of privacy doctrine, established in 1967, is now the theoretical backbone of Fourth Amendment analysis. Probable cause, the level of evi- dence required by the Constitution before government agents can invade individual privacy, is the required basis for arrests and searches and seiz ...
C H A P T E R 3Essential FourthAmendmentDoctrines10.docx
C H A P T E R 3Essential FourthAmendmentDoctrines10.docx
humphrieskalyn
Search_Incident_to_A_Lawful_Arrest_Paper[1]
Search_Incident_to_A_Lawful_Arrest_Paper[1]
Victor Herrera
Searches in the Kenyan Criminal Justice System
Searches (Criminal procedure in Kenya)
Searches (Criminal procedure in Kenya)
Quincy Kiptoo
Chapter 13: Interrogation, Electronic Surveillance, and Other Police Practices 471 # 151053 Cust: Cengage Au: Hall Pg. No. 471 Title: Criminal Law and Procedure Server: __________________ K Short / Normal DESIGN SERVICES OF S4-CARLISLE Publishing Services confessions, and admissions to prove guilt is controversial. The United States Supreme Court has recognized that admissions are highly suspect when relied upon alone to obtain a confession. The Court stated, in Escobedo v. Illinois (1964),4 that a “system of criminal law enforcement which comes to depend on the ‘confession’ will, in the long run, be less reliable and more subject to abuses than a system which depends on extrinsic evidence independently” obtained through other law enforcement practices. At common law, confessions and admissions could be used freely, as long as they were made voluntarily. The early basis for excluding involuntary confessions was the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.5 Eventually, federal defendants could seek to have confessions suppressed if they were not taken before a mag- istrate promptly after arrest. This was known as the McNabb-Mallory rule, named for two Supreme Court cases.6 The rule was not constitutionally based. Instead, the Court announced the rule in its supervisory role over the nation’s federal courts. While the rule of quick presentment of arrestees to judges had existed at common law and had been codified by Congress, there was no remedy for violations. Accordingly, the Court held that confessions that occurred after unreasonable delays should be excluded. Congress re- acted to McNabb-Mallory and Miranda by enacting a statute that permits the admission of a confession so long as it was voluntarily given. Another section provides that regardless of any delay in presenting a suspect to a judge, a confession shall be admitted if obtained within 6 hours of arrest. In Corley v. United States, 556 U.S.—(2009) it was held that if there is a delay in presenting a suspect to a judge longer than 6 hours, the old McNabb- Mallory exclusionary rule applies if a delay is found to be unreasonable. Today, interrogations, confessions, and admissions are governed by these rules, as well as two broader rights: the Fifth Amendment right to be free from self-incrimina- tion and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Miranda By virtue of popular television and films, the Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona, or at least the “Miranda” warnings that are a product of that case, is one of the best known judicial decisions of our time. [The Supreme Court consolidated appeals from several individuals who had been convicted at trials where their confessions were entered into evidence. Ernesto Miranda, for whom the case is named, was arrested for rape and kidnapping. He was interrogated at a police station. He was not advised of his constitutional rights, he never requested to see .
Chapter 13 Interrogation, Electronic Surveillance, and Other .docx
Chapter 13 Interrogation, Electronic Surveillance, and Other .docx
bartholomeocoombs
Ch08
Ch08
icebergslim1996
Ch12
Ch12
icebergslim1996
C H A P T E R 5 Warrantless Searches 236 [T]he most basic constitutional rule in this area is that “searches conducted outside the judicial process, without prior approval by judge or magistrate, are per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment—subject only to a few specifically established and well-delineated exceptions.” . . . In times of unrest, whether caused by crime or racial conflict or fear of internal subversion, this basic law and the values that it represents may appear unrealistic or “extravagant” to some. But the values were those of the authors of our fundamental constitutional concepts. —JUSTICE POTTER STEWART, Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 455 (1971) CHAPTER OUTLINE HOT PURSUIT AND OTHER EXIGENCY SEARCHES Hot Pursuit Other Exigencies THE AUTOMOBILE EXCEPTION An Overview of Vehicle Search Rules The Automobile Exception Search Incident to Arrest Meets the Automobile Search Searches of Containers in Mobile Vehicles AUTOMOBILE INVENTORY SEARCHES BORDER AND EXTRATERRITORIAL SEARCHES Border Searches Extraterritorial Arrests and Searches REGULATORY SEARCHES AND THE SPECIAL NEEDS DOCTRINE Origins of the Doctrine and Administrative Searches Fire Inspections Early Special Needs Cases: Creating a Doctrine Drug Testing LAW IN SOCIETY: RACIAL PROFILING AND CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS Racial Profiling and the “War on Drugs” The Discovery of Racial Profiling The Political Reaction to Racial Profiling Is Racial Profiling a Rational Policy? The Costs of Racial Profiling SUMMARY LEGAL PUZZLES JUSTICES OF THE SUPREME COURT: THOUGHTFUL CONSERVATIVES: CLARK, HARLAN II, STEWART, AND WHITE Tom C. Clark John M. Harlan II Potter Stewart Byron R. White KEY TERMS administrative search automobile search border border search crime scene investigation exception emergency aid doctrine exigency exception extraterritorial fixed checkpoint hot pursuit impound in loco parentis inventory search pervasively regulated industry roving patrol special needs doctrine warrantless search M05_ZALM7613_06_SE_CH05.QXD 1/11/10 5:09 PM Page 236 G A R R E T T , M E G A N 1 3 2 4 T S Warrantless Searches 237 Warrantless searches are of enormous practical importance to police work. Despite the Supreme Court’s preference for a search warrant, warrantless searches are far more common. Every warrantless search is conducted without prior judicial review but is subject to judicial re- view after the fact. Nevertheless, a search based on an officer’s assessment of probable cause is more likely to be arbitrary than one subjected to the warrant process. This text has already discussed several kinds of warrantless searches: plain view, consent, search incident to arrest, and the Terry stop and frisk. Each is based on a different rationale and is held to different legal standards. An item lawfully seized in plain view, for example, involves no Fourth Amendment interest or expectation of privacy because the officer is in ...
C H A P T E R 5Warrantless Searches236[T]he most ba.docx
C H A P T E R 5Warrantless Searches236[T]he most ba.docx
RAHUL126667
The Fourth Amendment Explained
The Fourth Amendment Explained
Jeremy Duncan
Ch09
Ch09
icebergslim1996
Terry vs. Ohio CJ302 Terry vs. Ohio Name Class Date Professor CJ302 Terry vs. Ohio Terry vs. Ohio was an important ruling made by the Supreme Court in 1968 concerning whether a search for weapons without probable cause by a police officer is an unreasonable search based on the rights afforded the citizen in the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The case that resulted in broadened investigatory powers for the police began when a police officer approached two men acting suspiciously and the behavior alerted the police officer that they men were potentially casing a store. After searching the suspects one of the suspects was carrying a concealed weapon and was arrested. After the petitioner, Terry, was found guilty of carrying a concealed weapon he appealed his case to the Supreme Court based on a potential Fourth Amendment violation when the police officer frisked him without any probable cause. Probable cause refers to a police officer needing to have reasonable grounds before stopping and frisking a private citizen and in cases where there is a search of the person, their property, or their personal effects probable cause is required to obtain a search warrant. After reviewing the case the majority ruled that the petitioners Fourth Amendment Right was not violated but in fact determined that a quick frisk of a criminal suspects is a reasonable search if the search is being conducted for a search of weapons that could potentially put the police officer at risk. The Supreme Court majority found that if the police officer was restricted in the field and unable to perform a frisk of a criminal suspect for their personal safety that the officer would in fact be unduly burdened (Siggins, 2002). What this means is the police officer has the right to frisk the suspect for safety purposes but not to seize contraband. Because police officers face grave danger in the field they are afforded a certain level of discretion. Part of this discretion involves identifying criminal suspects while in the field. In order to safely determine if the suspect is engaged in criminal behavior police officers have been afforded the discretion to search these suspects for weapons. The problem is the police officer has to have a reasonable belief that the suspects are armed with a weapon and instead the Terry stop has become a common aspect of every brief detention. The challenge is that police officers use the Terry stop to identify suspects instead of identifying suspects and then making a Terry stop. For example a suspect may be pulled over for a burned out taillight but then searched by the police based on reasonable suspicion. Minor traffic violations should not be considered a reasonable cause to search a suspect. In the case that led to the police officer being allowed to frisk suspects the police officer had a reasonable suspicion that the offenders where engaging in criminal behavior but w ...
Terry vs. Ohio CJ302 Terry vs. OhioNam.docx
Terry vs. Ohio CJ302 Terry vs. OhioNam.docx
mattinsonjanel
Semelhante a Chapter 7
(17)
Chapter 6 power point
Chapter 6 power point
Lesson 31
Lesson 31
Lesson 31
Lesson 31
Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d .docx
Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968) 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d .docx
C H A P T E R 4Arrest and Stopunder the FourthAmendment.docx
C H A P T E R 4Arrest and Stopunder the FourthAmendment.docx
Criminalistics DB1NameClassDateProfessor.docx
Criminalistics DB1NameClassDateProfessor.docx
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 7
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 7
C H A P T E R 3Essential FourthAmendmentDoctrines10.docx
C H A P T E R 3Essential FourthAmendmentDoctrines10.docx
Search_Incident_to_A_Lawful_Arrest_Paper[1]
Search_Incident_to_A_Lawful_Arrest_Paper[1]
Searches (Criminal procedure in Kenya)
Searches (Criminal procedure in Kenya)
Chapter 13 Interrogation, Electronic Surveillance, and Other .docx
Chapter 13 Interrogation, Electronic Surveillance, and Other .docx
Ch08
Ch08
Ch12
Ch12
C H A P T E R 5Warrantless Searches236[T]he most ba.docx
C H A P T E R 5Warrantless Searches236[T]he most ba.docx
The Fourth Amendment Explained
The Fourth Amendment Explained
Ch09
Ch09
Terry vs. Ohio CJ302 Terry vs. OhioNam.docx
Terry vs. Ohio CJ302 Terry vs. OhioNam.docx
Último
A short exhibit showcasing three concepts from sociology.
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
jbellavia9
national learning camp 2024
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
MaritesTamaniVerdade
Subject Environmental Sciences in the syllabus of 1st year b pharmacy semester 2nd contain point The FOOD CHAIN & FOOD WEB.
Food Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-II
Food Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-II
Shubhangi Sonawane
MBA Sem 4 | Business Analytics [BA 4] | Previous Year Question Paper | Summer 2023 | Web and Social Media Analytics | Solved PYQ | By Jayanti Pande | ProNotesJRP
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Jayanti Pande
SGLG2024
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
negromaestrong
In Bachelor of Pharmacy course, Class- 1st year, sem-II Subject EVS having topic of ECOLOGICAL SUCCESSION under the ECOSYSTEM point in this presentation points like ecological succession , types of ecological succession like primary and secondary explain with diagram. Students having deep knowledge about Ecological Succession after studying this presentation.
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
Shubhangi Sonawane
A Transgenic animal is one that carries a foreign gene that has been deliberately inserted into its genome. The foreign gene are inserted into the germ line of the animal, so it can be transmitted to the progeny. Transgenic animals are animals that are genetically altered to have traits that mimic symptoms of specific human pathologies. They provide genetic model of various human disease which are important in understanding disease and development of new target.
Role Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptx
Role Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptx
NikitaBankoti2
https://medicaleducationelearning.blogspot.com/2024/02/using-micro-scholarship-to-incentivize.html
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
Poh-Sun Goh
Mehran University Newsletter is a Quarterly Publication from Public Relations Office
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University of Engineering & Technology, Jamshoro
Z Score,T Score, Percentile Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Thiyagu K
Students will get the knowledge of the following- meaning of the pricing, its importance, objectives, methods of pricing, factors affecting the price of products, An overview of DPCO (Drug Price Control Order) and NPPA (National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority)
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
VishalSingh1417
SGK
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
QucHHunhnh
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Thiyagu K
As Odoo is a comprehensive business management software suite, the Calendar view is a powerful tool used to visualize and manage events, tasks, meetings, deadlines and other time-sensitive activities across various modules such as CRM, Project management, HR modules and more. In this slide, we can just go through the the steps of creating a calendar view for a module in Odoo 17.
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Celine George
General introduction about Microwave assisted reactions.
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
Maksud Ahmed
Andreas Schleicher, Director for Education and Skills at the OECD, presents at the webinar No Child Left Behind: Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis on 30 April 2024.
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
EduSkills OECD
Importance of information and communication (ICT) in 21st century education. Challenges and issues related to ICT in education.
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
MaryamAhmad92
God is a creative God Gen 1:1. All that He created was “good”, could also be translated “beautiful”. God created man in His own image Gen 1:27. Maths helps us discover the beauty that God has created in His world and, in turn, create beautiful designs to serve and enrich the lives of others.
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
christianmathematics
In BC’s nearly-decade-old “new” curriculum, the curricular competencies describe the processes that students are expected to develop in areas of learning such as mathematics. They reflect the “Do” in the “Know-Do-Understand” model. Under the “Communicating” header falls the curricular competency “Explain and justify mathematical ideas and decisions.” Note that it contains two processes: “Explain mathematical ideas” and “Justify mathematical decisions.” I have broken it down into its separate parts in order to understand--or reveal--its meaning. The first part is commonplace in classrooms. By now, BC math teachers—and students—understand that “Explain mathematical ideas” means more than “Show your work.” Teachers consistently ask “What did you do?” and “How do you know?” This process is about retelling, not just of steps but of thinking. The second part happens less frequently. Think back to the last time that you observed a student make—a necessary precursor to justify—a mathematical decision. “Justify” is about defending. Like “explain,” it involves reasoning; unlike “explain,” it also involves opinion and debate. In order to reinterpret the curricular competency “Explain and justify mathematical ideas and decisions,” I will continue to take apart its constituent part “Justify mathematical decisions” and carefully examine the term “mathematical decisions.” What, exactly, is a “mathematical decision”? Below, I will categorize answers to this question. These categories, and the provided examples, may help to suggest new opportunities for students to justify.
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Chris Hunter
Class 11th formulas physics
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
AyushMahapatra5
Último
(20)
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
Food Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-II
Food Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-II
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
Ecological Succession. ( ECOSYSTEM, B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II, Environmen...
Role Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptx
Role Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptx
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Chapter 7
1.
Chapter 7: Police
and Constitutional Law
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
Baixar agora