SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 26
QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT (QFD) CHAPTER 6
QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT (QFD) Quality Function Deployment (QFD) is an approach to design introduced in Japan in 1966 by Yoji Akao.
Dr. Akao is a professor of industrial Engineering at Tamagawa University in Tokyo and is one of the foremost leaders in the TQC movement in Japan.  He has long led and participated in many of the key research committees of the Union of Japanese Scientists and Engineers (JUSE), the Japanese Standards Association (JSA) and the Japanese Society for Quality Control (JSQC)
Why QFD? A  lack of well defined product development processes in research and design can be the root cause for the ruination of a company. To have a successful product, we must understand user needs.
Why QFD? QFD provides a formal process to understand user needs and to weave these needs across the entire product development cycle including manufacturing.
DEFINITION OF QFD QFD is a very systematic and organized approach of taking customer needs and demands in the consideration when designing a new products and services or when improving existing products and services.
CUSTOMER DRIVEN PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT Design  Requirements C u Sto mer vo ice P r o c e s s P a r t s D e s i g n Process  Requirements Production  Standards Parts Requirements Phase I: Product Planning Phase II: Part Deployment Phase III: Process Planning Phase IV: Production planning Phase I: Product Planning Phase II: Part Deployment Phase III: Process Planning Phase IV: Production planning
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
 
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Technical Descriptors (HOWs)  Material  Selection  Manufacturing Process   BASIC HOUSE OF QUALITY MATRIX +9  Strong Positive  +3  Positive -9  Strong Negative  - 3  Negative   +9  Strong  +3  Medium  +1  Weak Steel Aluminum Titanium Die Casting Sand Casting Forging Powder metallurgy Welding Primary Performance Aesthetics Cutomer requirements  (WHATs) Secondary Our Product A's Product B's Product Technical  Our Product  0  5  0  0  5  0  0  0 Competitive  A's Product  0  0  5  0  5  0  0  0 Assessment  B's Product  5  0  0  4  0  0  0  0  Absolute weight Sales Point Target Value Scale Up Factor Importance to Customer Customer Competitive Assessment Primary Prioritized Cutomer  Requirements Interrelationship between  technical descriptors  (Correlation Matrix)  HOWs Vs. HOWs. Relationship between customer  requirements and technical  descriptors HOWs  Vs. HOWs . Target Value  Absolute Weight  Relative Weight  Degree of  Technical difficulty  Prioritized Cutomer Requirements
Reasonable Cost Aerodynamic Look Nice Finish Corrosion resistant Light Weight Strength Durable REFINEMENT OF CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS Primary Performance Aesthetics Cutomer requirements (WHATS) Secondary Teritary
Steel Aluminum Titanium Welding Die Casting Sand Casting Forging REFINEMENT OF TECHNICAL DESCRIPTORS Primary Manufacturing  Process Material  Selection Technical Descriptors (HOWs) Secondary Teritary Power Metallurgy
Technical Descriptors  (HOWs)  Material  Manufacturing Selection  Process Reasonable Cost Aerodynamic Look Nice Finish Corrosion resistant Light Weight Strength Durable STRUCTURING AN L-SHAPED DIAGRAM Steel Aluminum Titanium Die Casting Sand Casting Forging Powder metallurgy Welding Primary Performance Aesthetics Cutomer requirements (WHATs) (WHATS) Secondary Primary Secondary
Technical Descriptors (HOWs)  Material  Selection  Manufacturing Process   Secondary Reasonable Cost Aerodynamic Look Nice Finish Corrosion resistant Light Weight Strength Durable ADDING RELATIONSHIP MATRIX  TO THE HOUSE OF QUALITY +9  Strong  +3  Medium  +1  Weak` Steel Aluminum Titanium Die Casting Sand Casting Forging Powder metallurgy Welding Primary Performance Aesthetics Cutomer requirements  (WHATs) Secondary Primary Relationship between customer  requirements and technical  descriptors WHATs Vs. HOWs .
Technical Descriptors (HOWs)  Material  Selection  Manufacturing Process   Secondary Reasonable Cost Aerodynamic Look Nice Finish Corrosion resistant Light Weight Strength Durable ADDING INTERRELATIONSHIP MATRIX  TO THE HOUSE OF QUALITY +9  Strong Positive  +3  Positive -9  Strong Negative  - 3  Negative   Steel Aluminum Titanium Die Casting Sand Casting Forging Powder metallurgy Welding Primary Performance Aesthetics Cutomer requirements  (WHATs) Secondary Primary Interrelationship between  technical descriptors  (Correlation Matrix)  WHATs Vs. HOWs. Relationship between customer  requirements and technical  descriptors WHATs Vs. HOWs . +9  Strong  +3  Medium  +1  Weak
Technical Descriptors (HOWs)  Material  Selection  Manufacturing Process   Secondary Reasonable Cost Aerodynamic Look Nice Finish Corrosion resistant Light Weight Strength Durable ADDING  CUSTOMER  COMPETITIVE ASSESSMENT  TO THE HOUSE OF QUALITY +9  Strong Positive  +3  Positive -9  Strong Negative  - 3  Negative   +9  Strong  +3  Medium  +1  Weak Steel Aluminum Titanium Die Casting Sand Casting Forging Powder metallurgy Welding Primary Performance Aesthetics Cutomer requirements  (WHATs) Secondary Our Product A's Product B's Product 3  4  2  4  5  3  4  5  3  4  4  2  3  4  2  3  3  4  3  3  4  Customer Competitive Assessment Primary Interrelationship between  technical descriptors  (Correlation Matrix)  HOWs Vs. HOWs. Relationship between customer  requirements and technical  descriptors WHATs Vs. HOWs .
Technical Descriptors (HOWs)  Material  Selection  Manufacturing Process   Secondary Reasonable Cost Aerodynamic Look Nice Finish Corrosion resistant Light Weight Strength Durable ADDING TECHNICAL COMPETITIVE ASSESSMENT TO THE HOUSE OF QUALITY +9  Strong Positive  +3  Positive -9  Strong Negative  - 3  Negative   +9  Strong  +3  Medium  +1  Weak Steel Aluminum Titanium Die Casting Sand Casting Forging Powder metallurgy Welding Primary Performance Aesthetics Cutomer requirements  (WHATs) Secondary Our Product A's Product B's Product 3  4  2  4  5  3  4  5  3  4  4  2  3  4  2  3  3  4  3  3  4  Customer Competitive Assessment Primary Interrelationship between  technical descriptors  (Correlation Matrix)  HOWs Vs. HOWs. Relationship between customer  requirements and technical  descriptors WHATs Vs. HOWs . Assessment  B's Product  5  0  0  4  0  0  0  0  Competitive  A's Product  0  0  5  0  5  0  0  0 Technical  Our Product  0  5  0  0  5  0  0  0
Technical Descriptors (HOWs)  Material  Selection  Manufacturing Process   Secondary Reasonable Cost Aerodynamic Look Nice Finish Corrosion resistant Light Weight Strength Durable ADDING PRIORITIZED CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS  TO THE HOUSE OF QUALITY +9  Strong Positive  +3  Positive -9  Strong Negative  - 3  Negative   +9  Strong  +3  Medium  +1  Weak Steel Aluminum Titanium Die Casting Sand Casting Forging Powder metallurgy Welding Primary Performance Aesthetics Cutomer requirements  (WHATs) Secondary Our Product A's Product B's Product Technical  Our Product  0  5  0  0  5  0  0  0 Competitive  A's Product  0  0  5  0  5  0  0  0 Assessment  B's Product  5  0  0  4  0  0  0  0  3  4  2  8  4  1.3  1.5  16 4  5  3  5  4  1  1.5  8 4  5  3  5  4  4  1  5 4  4  2  2  4  1  1  2 3  4  2  7  4  1.3  2  18 3  3  4  3  3  1  1  3 3  3  4  5  3  1  1  5 Absolute weight Sales Point Target Value Scale Up Factor Importance to Customer Customer Competitive Assessment Primary Prioritized Cutomer  Requirements Interrelationship between  technical descriptors  (Correlation Matrix)  HOWs Vs. HOWs. Relationship between customer  requirements and technical  descriptors WHATs Vs. HOWs .
Technical Descriptors (HOWs)  Material  Selection  Manufacturing Process   Secondary Reasonable Cost Aerodynamic Look Nice Finish Corrosion resistant Light Weight Strength Durable ADDING PRIORITIZED CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS  TO THE HOUSE OF QUALITY +9  Strong Positive  +3  Positive -9  Strong Negative  - 3  Negative   +9  Strong  +3  Medium  +1  Weak Steel Aluminum Titanium Die Casting Sand Casting Forging Powder metallurgy Welding Primary Performance Aesthetics Cutomer requirements  (WHATs) Secondary Our Product A's Product B's Product Technical  Our Product  0  5  0  0  5  0  0  0 Competitive  A's Product  0  0  5  0  5  0  0  0 Assessment  B's Product  5  0  0  4  0  0  0  0  3  4  2  8  4  1.3  1.5  16 4  5  3  5  4  1  1.5  8 4  5  3  5  4  4  1  5 4  4  2  2  4  1  1  2 3  4  2  7  4  1.3  2  18 3  3  4  3  3  1  1  3 3  3  4  5  3  1  1  5 Absolute weight Sales Point Target Value Scale Up Factor Importance to Customer Customer Competitive Assessment Primary Prioritized Cutomer  Requirements Interrelationship between  technical descriptors  (Correlation Matrix)  HOWs Vs. HOWs. Relationship between customer  requirements and technical  descriptors WHATs Vs. HOWs . Target Value  5  5  5  4  5  0  0  0  Absolute Weight  168  227  193  92  162  122  132  125 Relative Weight  251  401  303  167  213  203  165  171  Degree of  Technical difficulty  1  6  9  4  7  3  6  9  Prioritized Cutomer Requirements

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Management responsibility
Management responsibilityManagement responsibility
Management responsibility
Ahmed Said
 
Quality Slides
Quality SlidesQuality Slides
Quality Slides
RobbieA
 

Mais procurados (20)

House of quality matrix
House of quality matrixHouse of quality matrix
House of quality matrix
 
Management responsibility
Management responsibilityManagement responsibility
Management responsibility
 
Introduction to Quality
Introduction to QualityIntroduction to Quality
Introduction to Quality
 
QFD
QFDQFD
QFD
 
Introduction to tqm
Introduction to tqmIntroduction to tqm
Introduction to tqm
 
Quality Function Deployment
Quality Function DeploymentQuality Function Deployment
Quality Function Deployment
 
Cost of quality
Cost of qualityCost of quality
Cost of quality
 
QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT
QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT
QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT
 
Quality
QualityQuality
Quality
 
Quality Slides
Quality SlidesQuality Slides
Quality Slides
 
Cost of quality
Cost of qualityCost of quality
Cost of quality
 
Cost of quality
Cost of qualityCost of quality
Cost of quality
 
Quality Function Deployment (Qfd)
Quality Function Deployment (Qfd)Quality Function Deployment (Qfd)
Quality Function Deployment (Qfd)
 
Quality function deployment (qfd)
Quality function deployment (qfd) Quality function deployment (qfd)
Quality function deployment (qfd)
 
Quality function deployment
Quality function deploymentQuality function deployment
Quality function deployment
 
Quality inspection presentation
Quality inspection presentationQuality inspection presentation
Quality inspection presentation
 
Iso and tqm
Iso and tqmIso and tqm
Iso and tqm
 
Quality Function Deployment presentation
Quality Function Deployment presentationQuality Function Deployment presentation
Quality Function Deployment presentation
 
Qfd house of quality
Qfd house of qualityQfd house of quality
Qfd house of quality
 
Six Sigma Qfd
Six Sigma QfdSix Sigma Qfd
Six Sigma Qfd
 

Destaque

Overview -productivity management
Overview -productivity managementOverview -productivity management
Overview -productivity management
Bharat Parmar
 
Quality Function Deployment for pizza
Quality Function Deployment for pizzaQuality Function Deployment for pizza
Quality Function Deployment for pizza
ibrahim azhar
 
An introduction to total productive maintenance (tpm
An introduction to total productive maintenance (tpmAn introduction to total productive maintenance (tpm
An introduction to total productive maintenance (tpm
arpitmishra
 

Destaque (17)

Introduction to TQM
Introduction to TQMIntroduction to TQM
Introduction to TQM
 
Acceptance sampling
Acceptance samplingAcceptance sampling
Acceptance sampling
 
Overview -productivity management
Overview -productivity managementOverview -productivity management
Overview -productivity management
 
LEAN Construction
LEAN ConstructionLEAN Construction
LEAN Construction
 
Lean Construction Webinar
Lean Construction WebinarLean Construction Webinar
Lean Construction Webinar
 
lean construction and integrated project delivery
lean construction and integrated project delivery lean construction and integrated project delivery
lean construction and integrated project delivery
 
Lean Six Sigma Mistake-Proofing Process Training Module
Lean Six Sigma Mistake-Proofing Process Training ModuleLean Six Sigma Mistake-Proofing Process Training Module
Lean Six Sigma Mistake-Proofing Process Training Module
 
Benchmarking TQM
Benchmarking TQMBenchmarking TQM
Benchmarking TQM
 
Taguchi method
Taguchi methodTaguchi method
Taguchi method
 
Quality Function Deployment for pizza
Quality Function Deployment for pizzaQuality Function Deployment for pizza
Quality Function Deployment for pizza
 
Introduction to Lean Construction
Introduction to Lean ConstructionIntroduction to Lean Construction
Introduction to Lean Construction
 
Lean Construction - Introduction
Lean Construction - IntroductionLean Construction - Introduction
Lean Construction - Introduction
 
Lean construction
Lean constructionLean construction
Lean construction
 
Benchmarking
BenchmarkingBenchmarking
Benchmarking
 
An introduction to total productive maintenance (tpm
An introduction to total productive maintenance (tpmAn introduction to total productive maintenance (tpm
An introduction to total productive maintenance (tpm
 
Failure Mode Effect Analysis (FMEA)
Failure Mode Effect Analysis (FMEA)Failure Mode Effect Analysis (FMEA)
Failure Mode Effect Analysis (FMEA)
 
Kaizen Philosophy
Kaizen PhilosophyKaizen Philosophy
Kaizen Philosophy
 

Semelhante a QUALITY FUCTION DEPLOYMENT

General Presentation Techniprodec 2016
General Presentation Techniprodec 2016General Presentation Techniprodec 2016
General Presentation Techniprodec 2016
Luis Aguilar
 
CV-PRAVIN-BE_MECH-__04_years_EXP new.PDF
CV-PRAVIN-BE_MECH-__04_years_EXP new.PDFCV-PRAVIN-BE_MECH-__04_years_EXP new.PDF
CV-PRAVIN-BE_MECH-__04_years_EXP new.PDF
Pravin Bhure
 
Resume of QA QC-Welding Engineer with 5+ years of exp
Resume of QA QC-Welding Engineer with 5+ years of expResume of QA QC-Welding Engineer with 5+ years of exp
Resume of QA QC-Welding Engineer with 5+ years of exp
Vijay Raghavan
 
Ashapura forge & fittings 16-17
Ashapura forge & fittings 16-17Ashapura forge & fittings 16-17
Ashapura forge & fittings 16-17
Akshaysinh Tantod
 

Semelhante a QUALITY FUCTION DEPLOYMENT (20)

Quality function deployment
Quality function deploymentQuality function deployment
Quality function deployment
 
Qfd
QfdQfd
Qfd
 
Hicasting brochure
Hicasting brochureHicasting brochure
Hicasting brochure
 
Moldflow Analysis Presentation
Moldflow Analysis PresentationMoldflow Analysis Presentation
Moldflow Analysis Presentation
 
Design of goods and services ppt @ bec doms
Design of goods and services ppt @ bec domsDesign of goods and services ppt @ bec doms
Design of goods and services ppt @ bec doms
 
Qfd
QfdQfd
Qfd
 
Resume -S DAS -F
Resume -S DAS -FResume -S DAS -F
Resume -S DAS -F
 
Qfd
QfdQfd
Qfd
 
Kevin MacDonald - ARM Convention 2016 presentation
Kevin MacDonald - ARM Convention 2016 presentationKevin MacDonald - ARM Convention 2016 presentation
Kevin MacDonald - ARM Convention 2016 presentation
 
General Presentation Techniprodec 2016
General Presentation Techniprodec 2016General Presentation Techniprodec 2016
General Presentation Techniprodec 2016
 
JBS Engineering, Howrah, Babbitt Metal Bearing
JBS Engineering, Howrah, Babbitt Metal BearingJBS Engineering, Howrah, Babbitt Metal Bearing
JBS Engineering, Howrah, Babbitt Metal Bearing
 
Bti Overview For Linkedin
Bti Overview For LinkedinBti Overview For Linkedin
Bti Overview For Linkedin
 
Additive-Manufacturing-Qualification-Certification-and-Implementation (1).pptx
Additive-Manufacturing-Qualification-Certification-and-Implementation (1).pptxAdditive-Manufacturing-Qualification-Certification-and-Implementation (1).pptx
Additive-Manufacturing-Qualification-Certification-and-Implementation (1).pptx
 
Mx castings june 2017 rev
Mx castings  june  2017 revMx castings  june  2017 rev
Mx castings june 2017 rev
 
International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)
International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)
International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)
 
International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)
International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)
International Journal of Engineering Research and Development (IJERD)
 
CV-PRAVIN-BE_MECH-__04_years_EXP new.PDF
CV-PRAVIN-BE_MECH-__04_years_EXP new.PDFCV-PRAVIN-BE_MECH-__04_years_EXP new.PDF
CV-PRAVIN-BE_MECH-__04_years_EXP new.PDF
 
Automotive Accessories BY Metal Form
Automotive Accessories BY Metal FormAutomotive Accessories BY Metal Form
Automotive Accessories BY Metal Form
 
Resume of QA QC-Welding Engineer with 5+ years of exp
Resume of QA QC-Welding Engineer with 5+ years of expResume of QA QC-Welding Engineer with 5+ years of exp
Resume of QA QC-Welding Engineer with 5+ years of exp
 
Ashapura forge & fittings 16-17
Ashapura forge & fittings 16-17Ashapura forge & fittings 16-17
Ashapura forge & fittings 16-17
 

Mais de ANNA UNIVERSITY

Mais de ANNA UNIVERSITY (12)

OLD SEVEN TOOLS OF QUALTIY MANAGEMENT
OLD SEVEN TOOLS OF QUALTIY MANAGEMENTOLD SEVEN TOOLS OF QUALTIY MANAGEMENT
OLD SEVEN TOOLS OF QUALTIY MANAGEMENT
 
NEW SEVEN TOOLS OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT
NEW SEVEN TOOLS OF QUALITY MANAGEMENTNEW SEVEN TOOLS OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT
NEW SEVEN TOOLS OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT
 
FAILURE MODE EFFECT ANALYSIS
FAILURE MODE EFFECT ANALYSISFAILURE MODE EFFECT ANALYSIS
FAILURE MODE EFFECT ANALYSIS
 
Statistics And Design Of Experiments
Statistics And Design Of ExperimentsStatistics And Design Of Experiments
Statistics And Design Of Experiments
 
Quality Initiatives Iso 9001 2000[1]
Quality Initiatives Iso 9001 2000[1]Quality Initiatives Iso 9001 2000[1]
Quality Initiatives Iso 9001 2000[1]
 
QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT
QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENTQUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT
QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT
 
New Seven Management Tools
New Seven Management ToolsNew Seven Management Tools
New Seven Management Tools
 
New seven management tools
New seven management toolsNew seven management tools
New seven management tools
 
Tqm fmea
Tqm fmeaTqm fmea
Tqm fmea
 
Tqm new tools
Tqm new toolsTqm new tools
Tqm new tools
 
Tqm old tools
Tqm old toolsTqm old tools
Tqm old tools
 
Statistics and design_of_experiments
Statistics and design_of_experimentsStatistics and design_of_experiments
Statistics and design_of_experiments
 

Último

Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactBeyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
PECB
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
QucHHunhnh
 
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
QucHHunhnh
 
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in DelhiRussian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
kauryashika82
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
ciinovamais
 

Último (20)

Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactBeyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
 
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
 
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdfMicro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
 
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan FellowsOn National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
 
PROCESS RECORDING FORMAT.docx
PROCESS      RECORDING        FORMAT.docxPROCESS      RECORDING        FORMAT.docx
PROCESS RECORDING FORMAT.docx
 
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
 
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdfWeb & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
 
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
 
Food Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-II
Food Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-IIFood Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-II
Food Chain and Food Web (Ecosystem) EVS, B. Pharmacy 1st Year, Sem-II
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
 
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfHoldier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
 
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual  Proper...General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual  Proper...
General Principles of Intellectual Property: Concepts of Intellectual Proper...
 
Energy Resources. ( B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II) Natural Resources
Energy Resources. ( B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II) Natural ResourcesEnergy Resources. ( B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II) Natural Resources
Energy Resources. ( B. Pharmacy, 1st Year, Sem-II) Natural Resources
 
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
 
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptxBasic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
 
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
 
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in DelhiRussian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
 
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfKey note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
 

QUALITY FUCTION DEPLOYMENT

  • 1. QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT (QFD) CHAPTER 6
  • 2. QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT (QFD) Quality Function Deployment (QFD) is an approach to design introduced in Japan in 1966 by Yoji Akao.
  • 3. Dr. Akao is a professor of industrial Engineering at Tamagawa University in Tokyo and is one of the foremost leaders in the TQC movement in Japan. He has long led and participated in many of the key research committees of the Union of Japanese Scientists and Engineers (JUSE), the Japanese Standards Association (JSA) and the Japanese Society for Quality Control (JSQC)
  • 4. Why QFD? A lack of well defined product development processes in research and design can be the root cause for the ruination of a company. To have a successful product, we must understand user needs.
  • 5. Why QFD? QFD provides a formal process to understand user needs and to weave these needs across the entire product development cycle including manufacturing.
  • 6. DEFINITION OF QFD QFD is a very systematic and organized approach of taking customer needs and demands in the consideration when designing a new products and services or when improving existing products and services.
  • 7. CUSTOMER DRIVEN PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT Design Requirements C u Sto mer vo ice P r o c e s s P a r t s D e s i g n Process Requirements Production Standards Parts Requirements Phase I: Product Planning Phase II: Part Deployment Phase III: Process Planning Phase IV: Production planning Phase I: Product Planning Phase II: Part Deployment Phase III: Process Planning Phase IV: Production planning
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14.
  • 15.  
  • 16.
  • 17. Technical Descriptors (HOWs) Material Selection Manufacturing Process BASIC HOUSE OF QUALITY MATRIX +9 Strong Positive +3 Positive -9 Strong Negative - 3 Negative +9 Strong +3 Medium +1 Weak Steel Aluminum Titanium Die Casting Sand Casting Forging Powder metallurgy Welding Primary Performance Aesthetics Cutomer requirements (WHATs) Secondary Our Product A's Product B's Product Technical Our Product 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 0 Competitive A's Product 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 Assessment B's Product 5 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 Absolute weight Sales Point Target Value Scale Up Factor Importance to Customer Customer Competitive Assessment Primary Prioritized Cutomer Requirements Interrelationship between technical descriptors (Correlation Matrix) HOWs Vs. HOWs. Relationship between customer requirements and technical descriptors HOWs Vs. HOWs . Target Value Absolute Weight Relative Weight Degree of Technical difficulty Prioritized Cutomer Requirements
  • 18. Reasonable Cost Aerodynamic Look Nice Finish Corrosion resistant Light Weight Strength Durable REFINEMENT OF CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS Primary Performance Aesthetics Cutomer requirements (WHATS) Secondary Teritary
  • 19. Steel Aluminum Titanium Welding Die Casting Sand Casting Forging REFINEMENT OF TECHNICAL DESCRIPTORS Primary Manufacturing Process Material Selection Technical Descriptors (HOWs) Secondary Teritary Power Metallurgy
  • 20. Technical Descriptors (HOWs) Material Manufacturing Selection Process Reasonable Cost Aerodynamic Look Nice Finish Corrosion resistant Light Weight Strength Durable STRUCTURING AN L-SHAPED DIAGRAM Steel Aluminum Titanium Die Casting Sand Casting Forging Powder metallurgy Welding Primary Performance Aesthetics Cutomer requirements (WHATs) (WHATS) Secondary Primary Secondary
  • 21. Technical Descriptors (HOWs) Material Selection Manufacturing Process Secondary Reasonable Cost Aerodynamic Look Nice Finish Corrosion resistant Light Weight Strength Durable ADDING RELATIONSHIP MATRIX TO THE HOUSE OF QUALITY +9 Strong +3 Medium +1 Weak` Steel Aluminum Titanium Die Casting Sand Casting Forging Powder metallurgy Welding Primary Performance Aesthetics Cutomer requirements (WHATs) Secondary Primary Relationship between customer requirements and technical descriptors WHATs Vs. HOWs .
  • 22. Technical Descriptors (HOWs) Material Selection Manufacturing Process Secondary Reasonable Cost Aerodynamic Look Nice Finish Corrosion resistant Light Weight Strength Durable ADDING INTERRELATIONSHIP MATRIX TO THE HOUSE OF QUALITY +9 Strong Positive +3 Positive -9 Strong Negative - 3 Negative Steel Aluminum Titanium Die Casting Sand Casting Forging Powder metallurgy Welding Primary Performance Aesthetics Cutomer requirements (WHATs) Secondary Primary Interrelationship between technical descriptors (Correlation Matrix) WHATs Vs. HOWs. Relationship between customer requirements and technical descriptors WHATs Vs. HOWs . +9 Strong +3 Medium +1 Weak
  • 23. Technical Descriptors (HOWs) Material Selection Manufacturing Process Secondary Reasonable Cost Aerodynamic Look Nice Finish Corrosion resistant Light Weight Strength Durable ADDING CUSTOMER COMPETITIVE ASSESSMENT TO THE HOUSE OF QUALITY +9 Strong Positive +3 Positive -9 Strong Negative - 3 Negative +9 Strong +3 Medium +1 Weak Steel Aluminum Titanium Die Casting Sand Casting Forging Powder metallurgy Welding Primary Performance Aesthetics Cutomer requirements (WHATs) Secondary Our Product A's Product B's Product 3 4 2 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 3 3 4 3 3 4 Customer Competitive Assessment Primary Interrelationship between technical descriptors (Correlation Matrix) HOWs Vs. HOWs. Relationship between customer requirements and technical descriptors WHATs Vs. HOWs .
  • 24. Technical Descriptors (HOWs) Material Selection Manufacturing Process Secondary Reasonable Cost Aerodynamic Look Nice Finish Corrosion resistant Light Weight Strength Durable ADDING TECHNICAL COMPETITIVE ASSESSMENT TO THE HOUSE OF QUALITY +9 Strong Positive +3 Positive -9 Strong Negative - 3 Negative +9 Strong +3 Medium +1 Weak Steel Aluminum Titanium Die Casting Sand Casting Forging Powder metallurgy Welding Primary Performance Aesthetics Cutomer requirements (WHATs) Secondary Our Product A's Product B's Product 3 4 2 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 4 2 3 4 2 3 3 4 3 3 4 Customer Competitive Assessment Primary Interrelationship between technical descriptors (Correlation Matrix) HOWs Vs. HOWs. Relationship between customer requirements and technical descriptors WHATs Vs. HOWs . Assessment B's Product 5 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 Competitive A's Product 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 Technical Our Product 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 0
  • 25. Technical Descriptors (HOWs) Material Selection Manufacturing Process Secondary Reasonable Cost Aerodynamic Look Nice Finish Corrosion resistant Light Weight Strength Durable ADDING PRIORITIZED CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS TO THE HOUSE OF QUALITY +9 Strong Positive +3 Positive -9 Strong Negative - 3 Negative +9 Strong +3 Medium +1 Weak Steel Aluminum Titanium Die Casting Sand Casting Forging Powder metallurgy Welding Primary Performance Aesthetics Cutomer requirements (WHATs) Secondary Our Product A's Product B's Product Technical Our Product 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 0 Competitive A's Product 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 Assessment B's Product 5 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 3 4 2 8 4 1.3 1.5 16 4 5 3 5 4 1 1.5 8 4 5 3 5 4 4 1 5 4 4 2 2 4 1 1 2 3 4 2 7 4 1.3 2 18 3 3 4 3 3 1 1 3 3 3 4 5 3 1 1 5 Absolute weight Sales Point Target Value Scale Up Factor Importance to Customer Customer Competitive Assessment Primary Prioritized Cutomer Requirements Interrelationship between technical descriptors (Correlation Matrix) HOWs Vs. HOWs. Relationship between customer requirements and technical descriptors WHATs Vs. HOWs .
  • 26. Technical Descriptors (HOWs) Material Selection Manufacturing Process Secondary Reasonable Cost Aerodynamic Look Nice Finish Corrosion resistant Light Weight Strength Durable ADDING PRIORITIZED CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS TO THE HOUSE OF QUALITY +9 Strong Positive +3 Positive -9 Strong Negative - 3 Negative +9 Strong +3 Medium +1 Weak Steel Aluminum Titanium Die Casting Sand Casting Forging Powder metallurgy Welding Primary Performance Aesthetics Cutomer requirements (WHATs) Secondary Our Product A's Product B's Product Technical Our Product 0 5 0 0 5 0 0 0 Competitive A's Product 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 Assessment B's Product 5 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 3 4 2 8 4 1.3 1.5 16 4 5 3 5 4 1 1.5 8 4 5 3 5 4 4 1 5 4 4 2 2 4 1 1 2 3 4 2 7 4 1.3 2 18 3 3 4 3 3 1 1 3 3 3 4 5 3 1 1 5 Absolute weight Sales Point Target Value Scale Up Factor Importance to Customer Customer Competitive Assessment Primary Prioritized Cutomer Requirements Interrelationship between technical descriptors (Correlation Matrix) HOWs Vs. HOWs. Relationship between customer requirements and technical descriptors WHATs Vs. HOWs . Target Value 5 5 5 4 5 0 0 0 Absolute Weight 168 227 193 92 162 122 132 125 Relative Weight 251 401 303 167 213 203 165 171 Degree of Technical difficulty 1 6 9 4 7 3 6 9 Prioritized Cutomer Requirements