2. 2
Introduction
History
Requirements of an ideal denture base material
Introduction to PMMA
Polymerisation reaction
Types of denture base resin
Heat activated resins
Chemically activated resin
Light activated resin
Physical properties of resins
Recent advancements
Summary
Bibliography
3. 3
Dentures – mode of replacement of
natural teeth since 700 BC
Increased patient awareness lead to
increased expectations
Significant advances in development of
new materials for replacement of lost
teeth
Acrylic resin is the most widely accepted
and used Denture base material.
4. 4
First Dental prosthesis – Egypt in 2500 BC
TORTOI
SE
SHELL
PORCE
-LAIN
CELLUL
OID
WOOD
CHEOP
LASTIC
ALUMI
NIUM
BONE
GUTTA
PERCH
A
BAKELI
TE
PVC
SS &
alloys
GOLDIVORY
VULCA
NITE
PMMA
5. 5
WOOD:
Readily available and inexpensive
Easily carvable
X Cracked in moisture
X Lacked aesthetics
X Degraded in oral environment
6. 6
BONE
Available at reasonable costs
Carvable
Better dimensional stability
X Aesthetic and hygiene concerns
IVORY
Stable in oral environment
Aesthetic and hygienic
X Not readily available
X expensive
First
fabricated
by
FAUCHARD
7. 7
PORCELAIN
Shaped easily
Ensured intimate contact with
underlying tissue
Stable
Minimal water sorption
Smooth surface
Less porosity
Low solubility
X Brittle
X Difficult in grinding and polishing
ALEXIS
DUCHATEAU
in 1774 - first
to fabricate
porcelain
denture
8. 8
18 – 20 karat gold alloyed with silver and teeth riveted to it
9. 9
TORTOISE SHELL
• It was the first thermoplastic denture base
material
• Formed by CF HARRINGTON in1850
GUTTA PERCHA
• Unstable
• First formed by EDWIN TRUMAN in 1851
10. 10
CHEOPLASTIC
• It is a low fusing alloy of silver, bismuth and
antimony
• First formed by ALFRED A BLANDY in 1856
11. 11
VULCANITE
• First self retaining dentures
• Functional
• Affordable
• Durable
• Dark red colour
• Unhygienic
NELSON
GOODYEAR
in 1864
12. 12
ALUMINIUM
• By Dr Bean in 1867 ( he also invented the
casting machine
CELLULOID
• Discolours easily
• Has a residual camphor taste
• Difficult to repair
• Obtained by plasticizing cellulose nitrate
with camphor
J. SMITH
HYATT in
1869
13. 13
BAKELKITE
• Stains easily
• Residual phenol taste
• Brittle
• Difficult to repair
• Short shelf life
POLY VINYL CHLORIDE
• Pleasing colour but difficult processing
methods
Dr. LEO
BAKELAND in
1909
14. 14
STAINLESS STEEL and BASE METAL ALLOYS
• Low density
• Low metal cost
• Higher resistance to tarnishing and
corrosion
• High modulus of elasticity
• Allergy to nickel
POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATE
• Most satisfactory material
tested till date.
Dr. WALTER
WRIGHT
(1937)
17. 17
PMMA/Acrylic resin is the material of
choice for full denture bases
Chemical model for many other
material developments – restorative
materials
The most satisfactory denture base
material used till date
REFERENCE : Material science for dentistry, B. W. Darwell, 9th Ed
18. 18
Acrylic resins are prepared by a free
radical addition polymerisation chain
reaction
REFERENCE : Material science for dentistry, B. W. Darwell, 9th Ed
19. 19
INITIATION RECTION
• Vinyl group susceptible to attack by free
radical
• Opening of π bond, and formation of σ
bond
• Shift of electron takes place
Initiation reaction
REFERENCE : Material science for dentistry, B. W. Darwell, 9th Ed
20. 20
PROPAGATION REACTION
• Process of repeated reaction of the same
type - chain propagation
• Steric hindrance effects – increased effects
on attack on next double bond
• Polymer chains with free radical – growing
or live chains
REFERENCE : Material science for dentistry, B. W. Darwell, 9th Ed
21. 21
TERMINATION REACTION
• Not a function of the chain length already
created
• Depends on the concentration of free
radicals in the system
• Self limitation of the reaction – mutual
annihilation of free radicals
REFERENCE : Material science for dentistry, B. W. Darwell, 9th Ed
22. 22
CHAIN TRANSFER
• Hydrogen abstraction - simple transfer of
an H2 atom to attacking radical
• Leaves a free radical residing on attacked
species
REFERENCE : Material science for dentistry, B. W. Darwell, 9th Ed
23. 23
Based on the mode of activation
• Heat activated PMMA
High impact resin
Rapid heat polymerising resin
Microwave – activated PMMA
• Chemical activated PMMA
• Light activated PMMA
27. 27
STORAGE
• Specific time and limits for storage
• May undergo changes
• Causes changes in working properties
• Change in Chemical and physical
properties of processed denture
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
29. 29
• Preparation of the mold
• Selection of separating medium
• Polymer -to-monomer ratio
• Polymer –monomer interaction
• Dough forming time
• Working time
• Packing
• Polymerization procedure
• Temperature rise
• Internal porosity
• Polymerisation cycle
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
32. 32
Proper finishing
Periphery should be sealed
Apply petroleum jelly on the inner surface of
the flask and on the casts
Adjustment of the plaster model
Plaster models are wetted - soaked with slurry
water
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
33. 33
Flask is filled with freshly mixed stone
Place cast on to the mixture
Contour the stone
coated with separating media (after
initial set)
Another mix of stone is poured into the
flask
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
34. 34
Incisal and occlusal surfaces of teeth
should be slightly exposed
Allow to set and coat with separating
media
Additional increment of stone filled
Lid is gently tapped in place
Apply pressure with pressure clamp
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
37. 37
Place the flask in boiling water for 4 mins
Remove and separate segments
Baseplate and softened wax are
removed
Prosthetic teeth remain firmly
Cleaned with mild detergent and rinsed
in boiling water
Dewaxing
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
38. 38
Prevent direct contact between
denture base resin and the mold
Failure
Water may affect
polymerisation rate and
alter optical and physical
properties
Presence of Monomer or
free polymer may fuse the
investment to denture base
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
39. 39
Water soluble alginate solution – most
popular separating agents
Produce thin film of calcium alginate
Water soluble
alginate solution
+
Calcium sulphate
dihydrate
Calcium alginate
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
40. 40
Application
• Applied on the exposed surfaces of a
warm, clean stone mold
• Carefully applied in the interdental surfaces
• Should not contact exposed tooth surfaces
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
41. 41
Polymerisation results in volumetric and
linear shrinkage (21% decrease)
Manufactures pre-polymerize – pre
shrinking
Powder + liquid = dough like mass
3:1 is accepted monomer : polymer
ratio (0.5% linear shrinkage)
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
42. 42
A workable mass is produced, which
passes through 5 stages
Sandy Stringy
Dough-
like
Rubbery Stiff
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
43. 43
SANDY
• Coarse or grainy
• Polymer beads remain unaltered
STRINGY
• Increased viscosity
• Monomer attacks polymer beads
DOUGH-LIKE (ideal for compression molding)
• Pliable dough
• Increased number of polymer chains
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
44. 44
RUBBERY OR ELASTIC
• Mass rebounds when compressed or
stretched
• Excess monomer is dissipated by
evaporation
STIFF
• Due to complete evaporation of free
monomer
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
45. 45
Time required to reach a dough like
stage
According to ADA spec.no.12 , required
consistency should be reached in
<40mins (clinically - <10min)
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
46. 46
Defined as the time that a denture base
material remains in the dough like stage
According to ADA spec. 12, material
should remain in dough like stage for
atleast 5 min
Refrigerating increases working time
Presence of moisture degrades physical
and aesthetic properties
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
47. 47
Placement and adaptation of denture
base resin within the mold cavity
Denture with
excessive thickness
and resultant mal-
positioning
Noticeable denture
porosities
OVERPACKING
UNDERPACKING
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
48. 48
Resin should be in dough-like state
Bent into an horse-shoe shape and
placed in position
Polyethylene sheet placed over resin –
incremental pressure applied
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
49. 49
Excess material – flash
Trial closures are repeated till no flash
remains
No polyethylene sheet to be placed for
final closure
Flask is transferred to a flask carrier –
maintains pressure
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
50. 50
Cross sectional representation of the flask and its contents
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
51. 51
When heated above 60⁰C, benzoyl
peroxide decomposes
Yields free radicals
Acts rapidly with monomer – chain
growth polymerisation
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
52. 52
Additional monomer molecules attach
to individual polymers – rapid
Heat required - activator
Benzoyl peroxide - initiator
Coupling of 2 grouping chains Transfer of H2 ion from one
chain to another
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
53. 53
Temperature - time heating curves for the water
Bath, investing plaster and acrylic resin during polymerisation
ofa thick denture base
REFERENCE : Material science for dentistry, B. W. Darwell, 9th Ed
54. 54
Initially heating is slow - resin occupies I
the centre of the mold
Temperature >70C – begin to increase
rapidly
Decomposition rate of benzoyl peroxide
is significantly increased
Resin and dental stone are poor
conductors – heat not dissipated
Temperature rises from that of the boiling point of monomer
(100.8 C)
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
56. 56
Porosities are formed when the
temperature of the resin exceeds that of
the unreacted monomer
resin is poor thermal conductor - heat
generated cannot be dissipated
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
57. 57
Heating process used to control
polymerization – curing cycle
Constant temp – 74C
For 8 hrsor longer with no
Terminal boiling treatment
Processing at - 74 C for 8hrs
and then increasing to 100
At 74 C for 2 hrs and then
Increasing to 100 C for 1 hr
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
58. 58
Temperature changes in acrylic resin when
subjected to various curing schedules
REFERENCE : Material science for dentistry, B. W. Darwell, 9th Ed
59. 59
Denture flask should be bench cooled
for 30mins before retrieval
Rapid cooling – warpage – differences
in thermal contraction of resin and
investing material
Immersed in cool tap water for 15 mins
Deflasked
Stored in water until delivery
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
60. 60
Half of the flask is filled with stone
Contoured and permitted to set
Sprues are attached to the wax denture
base
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
61. 61
Investment process is completed.
Wax elimination is performed
Flask is placed under pressure
Resin mix is introduced into the mold
polymerised
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
62. 62
High-impact strength resin
• Reinforced with butadiene-styrene rubber.
• Rubber particles are grafted to methyl
methacrylate to bond to the acrylic matrix
• Supplied in powder-liquid form
• Conventionally processed
63. 63
Rapid heat-polymerized resin
• Hybrid acrylics, with both chemical and
heat-activated initiators - allow rapid
polymerization
• No porosity expected
• polymerized in boiling water for 20 minutes
64. 64
Microwave-activated PMMA:
• Nishii (1968) first used microwave energy to
polymerize denture base resin in a 400 watt
microwave oven for 2.5 minutes. This
research was later carried on by Kimura et
al (1983) and De Clerk.
66. 66
Chemical activators used to induce
polymerisation
Cold curing / self curing/ auto-
polymerising resin
Chemical used – dimethyl –para-
toluidine (to monomer)
Initiates breakdown of benzoyl
peroxide to produce free radicals and
Hence polymerisation
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
67. 67
Degree of polymerisation is not
complete – greater amount of
unreacted monomer
Less colour stability due to the presence
of the amine – susceptible to oxidation
Plasticizer -
Results in decreased
transverse strength
Potential tissue irritant
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
68. 68
Less shrinkage and greater dimensional
accuracy compared to heat activated
PMMA
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
69. 69
Supplied in monomer – polymer form
Mixed according to manufacturer’s
instructions to attain dough like
consistency
Working time is shorter
Refrigerating monomer increases
working time – rate of polymerization
decreases
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
70. 70
Pressure must be maintained throughout
Initial hardening – 30 min
Flask should be held under pressure for
min. 3 hrs
Low degree of polymerisation –
dimensional instability – soft tissue
irritation
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
71. 71
Employs a pourable, chemically
activated resin
When mixed – low viscosity resin
Completed tooth arrangement is sealed
to the underlying cast
Flask is filled with reversible hydrocolloid
– allowed to cool
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
72. 72
After gelation – cast is removed and
sprues and vents are cut on the external
surface
Wax is eliminated using hot water
Teeth are carefully retrieved and placed
in position
Resin is mixed and poured via sprue
channels
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
73. 73
Placed in pressurised chamber at room
temperature
Allowed to polymerize for30 – 45minutes
Denture is retrieved, sprues are removed
Returned to articulator for correction of
processing changes
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
75. 75
Advantages
• Improved adaptation
• Decreased probability to damage to the
teeth
• Reduced cost
• Simplification of procedure
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
76. 76
Disadvantages
• Noticeable shift of teeth
• Air entrapment
• Poor bonding
• Technique sensitive
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
79. 79
Supplied in sheet and rope form
Packed in light proof pouches
Opaque investing material is required –
no conventional method
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
80. 80
Denture is moulded on an accurate cast
Exposed to a high intensity visible light
for a period
Removed from the mold
Finished and polished
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
82. 82
The physical properties will be discussed
under the following headings:
Polymerisation shrinkage
Porosity
Water absorption
Solubility
Processing stresses
Crazing
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
83. 83
During polymerization the density of the
mass changes from 0.94 g/cm3 to 1.19
g/cm3. thus a volumetric shrinkage of
21%
Linear shrinkage – denture base
adaptation and cuspal interdigitation
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
84. 84
Volumetric shrinkage – 7%, hence linear
shrinkage 2%
Initial cooling – resin is soft – contraction
occurs at the same rate as that of
dental stone
At glass transition temperature –
contraction occurs at a faster rate than
the surrounding stone.
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
87. 87
Surface or subsurface voids compromise
physical and aesthetic properties
More likely to develop in thicker portions
Due to vapourization of unreacted
monomer and low molecular weight
polymers
Does not occur equally
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
88. 88
Can also be due to inadequate mixing
of powder and liquid
Regions with more monomer, shrink
more – resulting in voids
Using proper monomer – polymer ratio is
essential
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
89. 89
Also due to insufficient pressure or less
material during polymerisation
Assume irregular shape
Resultant resin appears lighter
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
90. 90
Final type is associated with fluid resins
Caused due to air inclusions during
mixing and pouring
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
91. 91
Absorbs relatively small amounts when
placed in water
Water molecules penetrate the PMMA
and occupy positions between polymer
chains – forces them apart
Slight expansion
In polymerised mass
Water acts as
plasticizers
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
92. 92
Water absorption value – 0.69 mg/cm2
Interferes with the polymer chain
Making them more mobile by releasing
stresses
Changes in shape
(insignificant)
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
93. 93
Insoluble in fluids in the oral cavity
Negligible loss
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
94. 94
Natural dimensional change is inhibited -
contains stresses
Stresses relaxed - distortion occurs
During polymerization tensile stresses are
sustained
Stress is produced during thermal
shrinkage also (cooling < glass transition
temperature)
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
95. 95
Additional factors include
• improper mixing and handling of the resin
• Poorly controlled heating and cooling of
flask assembly
Dimensional changes due to small
stresses - 0.1 to 0.2mm
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
96. 96
Stress relaxation may produce flaws -
CRAZING
Hazy or foggy appearance
Tensile stresses most often responsible
and may result the denture to crack.
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
97. 97
Produced due to mechanical
separation of individual polymer chains –
tensile stresses
Also due to solvent action
Begins at surface of the resin and
oriented to right angles to the tensile
forces.
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
98. 98
Load application produces stresses
within the resin – change in shape
Strength of the resin is directly
proportional to the degree of
polymerisation shrinkage
Heat activated resins display lower
degree of polymerisation
99. 99
Act as rubbery solids that recover from
elastic deformation once stresses are
eliminated – viscoelastic behaviour
If load is not removed additional plastic
deformation occurs – creep
Rate at which this deformation occurs –
creep rate
REFERENCE : Phillips' Science of dental materials, Anusavice,
11th Ed
101. 101
The radiolucent nature of PMMA is one of
its disadvantages as a denture base
material.
Denture wearers can endure serious
complications if their dentures fractures
and a portion is inhaled or ingested.
Use of sophisticated ultrasound techniques
also prove to be difficult for detection.
102. 102
The most promising material - Silanated
barium fluoride impregnated powdered
glass. (kasim 1998)
Barium sulphate (BaSO4) has also been
added to denture base resins to
improve radiopacity.
Lang et al. (2000) investigated the
potential for triphenylbismuth
incorporated into injection moulded
heat cure resins to improve radiopacity.
103. 103
Inhibition of Candida albicans on
denture resins could play a significant
role in preventing the development of
denture stomatitis
PMMA-silver nanoparticle discs were
formulated, with the commercial acrylic
resin
104. 104
The inner surface of the prosthesis is
rough, and in addition to local (eg, poor
hygiene, local trauma, tissue integrity
loss) and systemic factors (eg,
malnutrition, diabetes mellitus, human
immunodeficiency virus infection,
xerostomia), contributes to the
proliferation of C. albicans
105. 105
Spherical silver nanoparticles were
synthesized and added to a PMMA
formulation, resulting in successful
reduction of adherence of C. albicans
106. 106
Commercially pure (CP) titanium has
appropriate mechanical properties
Lightweight (low density) compared with
conventional dental alloys
Outstanding biocompatibility that
prevents metal allergic
reactions
107. 107
Flexible denture material is available in the
form of granules in cartridges of varying
sizes.
It was first introduced by the name of
valplast and flexiplast to dentistry in 1956.
These are superpolyamides which belong
to nylon family
108. 108
Advantages
• Soft inherent flexibility
• Will not warp
• Clinically unbreakable
• No porosity
• Less bulky
• Biocompatible
• Better esthetics
• Better chewing efficiency
109. 109
Disadvantages
• De-bonding of acrylic teeth
• Discolouration
• High surface roughness
• Cannot be relined
• Difficult to polish
• Technique sensitive
• Cannot be repaired
112. 112
Contraindications :
• Insufficient inter-arch space (< 4mm space
for placement of teeth)
• Prominent residual ridges
• Flat, flabby ridges
113. 113
Management of xerostomia patients - soft
and adapt well to the gums - comfortable
for wearing.
retain moisture and give better lubrications
than acrylic dentures
biocompatible - safe for patients with
carcinoma.
lighter in weight, are not brittle, do not
warp
suitable in conditions of inadequate
vertical dimension
114. 114
One modification of the Valplast partial
denture is called the Nesbit.
The Nesbit is used to replace one to
three teeth on the same side of the
mouth and is much smaller than a
conventional partial denture.
115. 115
The procedure can be completed in
two short visits, requires no anesthesia or
drilling of teeth (in most cases), and the
cost is substantially less than either a
permanent bridge or dental implants.
A Valplast Nesbit is generally easy to get
used to, and has a very realistic
appearance
117. 117
The transverse strength of high-impact
denture base resin can be increased
significantly by a factor of 29% and 76%
when reinforced with zirconia in a
concentration of 5% and 15%
respectively
In this process, expansion of ZrO2 crystals
occurs and places the crack under a
state of compressive stress and crack
propagation is arrested
118. 118
To improve the physical and
mechanical properties of acrylic resin, it
was reinforced with fibres
1. Carbon fibres
2. Kevlar fibres
3. Glass fibres
119. 119
CARBON FIBRES:
• The use of Carbon fibres as denture base
strengtheners have been investigated by
Larson et al and Sonit(1991) .
• Carbon fibres have been shown to improve
flexural and impact strength, prevent
fatigue fracture and increased fatigue
resistance on treating with silane coupling
agent(Yazdanie-1985)
120. 120
KEVLAR FIBRES:
• These fibres are resistant to chemicals, are
thermally stable, and have a high
mechanical stability, melting point, and
glass transitional temperature
• Studies conducted by Berrong et al(1990)
have shown to significantly increase the
impact strength and the modulus of
elasticity of the resin but they are also
unesthetic
121. 121
GLASS FIBRES:
• Different types of glass fibres are produced
commercially; these include E-glass, S-glass,
R-glass, V-glass, and Cemfil.
• E-glass fibre - high alumina and low alkali
and borosilicate, is claimed to be superior in
flexural strength
• Because the modulus of elasticity of glass
fibres is very high, most of the stresses are
received by them without deformation
122. 122
No denture base material has yet been
developed which completely fulfils all the
criteria for success and conversely does not
posses any of the above noted problems.
Since PMMA was introduced, most dental
material research has focused upon
developing materials with higher strength,
lower levels of residual methacrylate
monomer after processing, improved
dimensional stability, increased radiopacity
and improved resistance to candidal
infiltration
123. 123
Phillip’s Sciences of dental materials,
Anusavice, 11th Ed
Material science for dentistry, B. W. Darwell,
9th Ed
Young, Beth C. (2010) A comparison of
polymeric denture base materials.
Cytotoxicity of denture base acrylic resins:
A literature review
http://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jdms/papers/Vol13-issue3/Version-2/C013320709.pdf.
Denture base resins : From past to future
http://ijds.in/article-pdf-RENU_TANDON_SAURABH_GUPTA_SAMARTH_KUMAR_AGARWAL-63.pdf