1. To Infinity and Beyond!
Public Library Association
Spring Symposium 2011
2. Inspiration
New Jersey Blue Ribbon Task Force
Mid-Atlantic Futures Conference
MN Office of the Legislative Auditor Report on Public
Libraries
No strategic state plan for libraries
General threats and challenges to libraries of all types
3. Why Multitypes Took the Lead
Multicounty multitype library systems take the lead
Talk across the lines
Recognize challenges and opportunities
Know the history of library structures & issues
Understand the importance of vision and planning
4. Steps
Multitype directors committed to funding the initial
planning meetings
Identified individuals and groups to participate in a
planning session
Issued the invitations
Hired a facilitator
5. Who was invited
Regional Public Library Systems
Public Libraries
Private Colleges
U of M Libraries
MnScu Libraries
Minnesota Library Association
Minnesota Educational Media Organization
Minitex
State Library
6. First meeting—May 2010
Goals of the Meeting
Agree that this was needed
Look at process & procedures
Create timeline
Establish subcommittees
7.
8. Steering Committee
Executive Committee
Application Development
Finance
Session Planning
Recruitment
Resource & Support for Futurists
9. Other Steering Committee
Meetings
June
Accepted work of subcommittees
Defined the Futurists Group
Application process
Session planning for Kick Off
10. What we wanted to happen
Identify challenges, changes, that will impact libraries
of all types
Create a foundation for a conversation about the
future, change, and getting there
Involve the library community in the conversation
11. “Ulterior Motives”
Introduce different types of library staff to each other
Encourage recognition of the shared problems and
issues
Encourage acknowledgement that all types of libraries
matter
Metro-centric attitude would be diluted
Identify common challenges
Leadership development
12. Accelerated timeline
Aim for Kick Off in October 2010
Selection of participants in September 2010
Futurists report in May 2011
15. Expectation that the Library
community would be involved
in the conversation, be used
as resources, & and would be
informed throughout the
course of the process.
16. No expectations that this
Futurists Group would be able
to define how to implement
changes.
17. Who?
A group of designated
people to have the focused
conversation…and then
could initiate a wider
conversation.
18. Applicant Criteria
Work in Minnesota library or be a library school
student
Between the ages 25-35
19. Questions for Applicants
What motivates you to want to be part of a group
involved in making recommendations for the future of
Minnesota’s Libraries?
Describe what comes to mind when you think of
“Minnesota Libraries”?
If you are selected as a member of the Library Futurists
– what do you hope is one possible outcome from the
work of the Initiative?
20. Who Applied?
83 applicants
6 School Librarians
44 Public
7 Special
26 Academic
21. Selection Criteria & Process
All types of libraries
Geographic representation
Everyone read all the applications
Scored on a rubric
Face to face discussion of applicants
22. Futurist Group Profile
3 School Librarians
3 Special/Other
6 Academic Librarians
12 Public Librarians
Geographic representation
24. Involving the Library Community
Everyone invited
Michael Rogers, The Practical Futurist
Christine Lind Hage, ALA Committee for America’s
Libraries for the 21st Century
25. First Meeting for Futurists
Facilitator to help them get started
Let them decide their own process, topics, & procedures
27. Thanks to Patricia Post, Executive Committee
Planning Documents
http://mnlfi.pbworks.com
Notas do Editor
OLA highlighted the need for a broad conversation about libraries in MNSilosNo strategic plan that addresses the challenges and changes that all types of faceNo other venue for this kind of conversation
We know everyone—talk across the linesKnow the challenges and opportunitiesKnow the history and politicsNo strong state library agency that looks to planningMore rulemaking rule enforcing fiscal oversightNot visionary or able to look to evolutionLack of evolution in MN library structure
Out of continuing education budgetsWhy a facilitator—to insure the neutrality of the discussion and decisions, keep us on task and track, summarizeMCMT hired the bus and the driver and let the “passengers” define the destination and the route
Broad as possible—metro, outstate, all typesEvery group identified 2 representativesState library in transitionThat if you didn’t to the first meeting, you couldn’t come to the remaining meetings—efficiency
Recognized that this was an ambitious time frameTo increase the efficiency and ensure results, created subcommittees
Amazingly enough—The conclusion is that everyone recognized and was was eager for a conversation these topics
That first meeting with the facilitator allowed everyone to express ideas and reservations about moving forward but in the end everyone agreed there was/is a need for doing a project like this. Involving everyone, looking aheadEveryone agreed to trust the process And trust the work of the subcommittee
Other leadership development opportunitiesWater vs plumbing
Buy in from library community
Ultimate charge for the Futurists
We want to be in charge of the vision—we know we are within various politician structures, but our history of collaboration and cooperation
Don’t expect—or want really—specific recommendations on structure, fundingThis isn’t a problem for the Futurists to solve—give the vision, the library community will take it from there
Don’t expect—or want really—specific recommendations on structure, fundingThis isn’t a problem for the Futurists to solve—give the vision, the library community will take it from there
We want to be in charge of the vision—we know we are within various politician structures, build our history of collaboration and cooperation
Most controversial was age limit—a lot of non-Minnesota nice emails and conversationsReasons on the wikiInspired by speaker at state conference on generations at work—the value of similar world experience, The age limit is not meant to imply that those older or younger than the 10-year range do not have contributions to make or ideas to share, but rather it reflects the research on age cohorts and the value that shared experience brings to discussions such as these. The presenter at the recent Minitex ILL conference made a compelling case for how different generations or cohorts interact with one another and those outside their cohort based on their shared experience of world events that have occurred during their lifetime, as well as the economics, political climate, demographic changes, environments, and other conditions that have influenced their development and world view. In addition, the Steering Committee wanted to go deeper into Minnesota libraries for voices and ideas that may not always be heard in other venues or outside their own settings.
Skeptics on Steering Committee questioned if we would even get 24 applicants
All notified yes or no. Given time to accept—required attendance at first meeting for participation
Wanted to get everyone on the bus--
Compromise on telling them what to do, how to organize, and topics to discuss by having the facilitator at their first 2 meetings.One steering committee member was an emerging leader really encouraged the use of a facilitator so they weren’t just tossed in to sink or swimFollowed the successful approach that worked with steering committee—hire the driver and bus—let them choose the destination and stops along the wayShould have done better coaching on using facilitator