Exploring technological regime changes.pptx
•Transferir como PPTX, PDF•
0 gostou•13 visualizações
the 13th International Conference on Information Integration and Innovation (ICIII 2022)
Recomendados
Recomendados
Mais conteúdo relacionado
Semelhante a Exploring technological regime changes.pptx
Semelhante a Exploring technological regime changes.pptx (20)
Mais de Lawrenzo H.C. Huang
Mais de Lawrenzo H.C. Huang (20)
Último
Último (17)
Exploring technological regime changes.pptx
- 1. Exploring technological regime changes a network investigation of semiconductors industry 1978-2017 Hung-Chun Huang, Hsin-Yu Shih, Tsung-Han Ke National Chi Nan University, Taiwan Department of International Business Studies the 13th International Conference on Information Integration and Innovation (ICIII 2022) Session I. Smart Perception and Immersive Applications
- 2. Functional Evolution of the Semiconductor Ecosystem (the 1950s–2010s) 1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s 2010s Software IP Provider IP Provider IP Provider Fabless Companies Fabless Companies Fabless Companies Fabless Companies Manufacturing Tools Manufacturing Tools Manufacturing Tools Manufacturing Tools Manufacturing Tools Manufacturing Tools IDM IDM IDM IDM IDM IDM IDM EDA Tools EDA Tools EDA Tools EDA Tools EDA Tools Foundries Foundries Foundries Foundries Packaging Packaging Source: de Heide, M., et al., Study on the changing role of Intellectual Property in the semiconductor industry –including non-practicing entities. 2014, European Commission, Directorate General of Communications Networks, Content & Technology. p. 6.
- 3. The technological regime The appropriability The opportunity The cumulativeness the opportunities from technological innovation as perceived by the market participants. Explicit technology can pursue formal protection mechanisms: such as patents the firm’s knowledge source: its pre-existing base or cohesive as supporting group with others. Dosi 1982; Bergek, Berggren, Magnusson, & Hobday, 2013 Malerba & Orsenigo, 1996 Nonaka & Krogh, 2009; Teece, 1986 Koka, Madhavan, and E.Prescott , 2006 An industry
- 4. When &What technological regime change in semiconductor industry?
- 5. Global share by countries AI 0% BZ 0% CR 0% FO 0% GP 0% KI 0% LK 0% LR 0% ME 0% ML 0% MO 0% MS 0% NA 0% NI 0% OM 0% PA 0% QA 0% RW 0% SB 0% SN 0% TN 0% UY 0% VN 0% XN 0% AZ 0% BV 0% CO 0% HR 0% IM 0% IS 0% KE 0% LB 0% MA 0% SC 0% VE 0% BY 0% EE 0% JO 0% TC 0% GE 0% KW 0% SK 0% EG 0% IR 0% UA 0% BG 0% LT 0% SI 0% un 0% KN 0% MU 0% CY 0% ID 0% KP 0% JE 0% PT 0% AE 0% BN 0% GR 0% MT 0% MX 0% GI 0% BR 0% AN 0% TR 0% PL 0% RO 0% WS 0% CZ 0% HU 0% NZ 0% ZA 0% SU 0% SA 0% TH 0% ES 0% PH 0% RU 0% BB 0% LI 0% DK 0% VG 0% NO 0% IN 0% LU 0% BM 0% IE 0% MY 0% HK 0% FI 0% SE 0% Null 0% IL 0% BE 0% AT 0% CH 0% CA 0% IT 0% GB 1% KY 1% NL 1% SG 1% FR 1% CN 1% DE 4% TW 8% KR 10% JP 33% US 37% Patents QA 0% RW 0% ML 0% ME 0% VE 0% AI 0% CR 0% SC 0% KI 0% MO 0% LR 0% VN 0% XN 0% FO 0% EE 0% GP 0% NA 0% IS 0% LB 0% SN 0% OM 0% PA 0% TN 0% KE 0% UY 0% HR 0% BV 0% IR 0% NI 0% IM 0% BZ 0% MS 0% SB 0% AZ 0% KW 0% CO 0% BY 0% JO 0% TC 0% KN 0% LK 0% SI 0% MA 0% BN 0% EG 0% un 0% KP 0% LT 0% SK 0% AE 0% UA 0% BG 0% PT 0% MT 0% MU 0% BR 0% MX 0% WS 0% CY 0% TR 0% ID 0% GE 0% GI 0% SU 0% JE 0% CZ 0% GR 0% ZA 0% RO 0% NZ 0% PL 0% SA 0% HU 0% RU 0% LI 0% AN 0% ES 0% BB 0% PH 0% IN 0% VG 0% LU 0% NO 0% DK 0% BM 0% TH 0% MY 0% HK 0% FI 0% AU 0% SE 0% BE 0% 0% AT 0% CH 0% IT 0% KY 0% IL 0% CA 0% GB 1% CN 1% FR 1% SG 1% NL 1% DE 4% TW 6% KR 7% JP 30% US 46% Network scale AI 0% BZ 0% CR 0% FO 0% GP 0% IM 0% KI 0% LK 0% LR 0% ME 0% ML 0% MO 0% MS 0% NA 0% NI 0% OM 0% PA 0% QA 0% RW 0% SB 0% SN 0% TN 0% UY 0% VN 0% XN 0% AZ 0% BV 0% CO 0% GE 0% GI 0% HR 0% IS 0% KE 0% LB 0% MA 0% SC 0% VE 0% BN 0% EE 0% MU 0% AN 0% BY 0% JO 0% KN 0% KW 0% TC 0% WS 0% BB 0% EG 0% ID 0% MT 0% SK 0% IR 0% LT 0% UA 0% AE 0% BG 0% CY 0% JE 0% SI 0% un 0% KP 0% PT 0% GR 0% MX 0% RO 0% BM 0% HU 0% PL 0% BR 0% TR 0% NZ 0% CZ 0% LU 0% TH 0% LI 0% SA 0% ZA 0% VG 0% PH 0% SU 0% KY 0% ES 0% RU 0% NO 0% DK 0% IE 0% IN 0% HK 0% FI 0% MY 0% SE 0% BE 0% AT 0% IL 1% IT 1% 1% CH 1% CA 1% NL 1% SG 1% GB 1% CN 2%FR 2% DE 4% TW 8% KR 12% JP 26% US 34% Firms Data description Total Years Patents 425,107 1978~2017 Firms 71,584 1978~2017 Country 108 1978~2017 Network scales 8,623,962 1978~2017 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Country
- 6. The change in opportunity During the 2008 1. Incumbents and newcomers have numerous technological innovations. 2. The entry barrier has decreased that may evoke newcomers to join. 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 Firms 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Patent
- 7. The change in appropriability 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 Network Scale (Nodes) 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 160,000 180,000 200,000 Linkage (edges) 0.0000 0.0500 0.1000 0.1500 0.2000 0.2500 0.3000 0.3500 0.4000 0.4500 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Centralization Degree Betweenness 1. The significant phase change during 2008 2. the decentralization trend in control power and breakage advantage reducing.
- 8. The change in cumulativeness 1. Technological development with patent self citation, individual path dependence. 2. The Small-World Quotient reveal technological clusterization. 3. During 2010, the new technological niche has appeared. 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 Linkage (self citation) 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 QSW Small-World Quotient
- 9. Conclusion The implication of current features suggests that firms or authorities should strategize the niche of technological territory. Cumulativeness: segmentation to develop compatible technologies or parallel technologies. appropriability regime: tactically issued patents in the current market for the first-move advantage. technological opportunities, the semiconductor industry has quality changes.
- 10. Q&A Hung-Chun Huang Ph.D. National Chi Nan University, TAIWAN Exploring technological regime changes a network investigation of semiconductors industry 1978-2017