Dialogue In Essay

Interview Dialogue
I: Please have a seat. (motion to chair)
A: Thank you. Oh, this is a copy of my resume and a list of references.
I: Thank you, I will take a look at these. I see you have applied for the cashier position.
A: Yes, that's right; I can work in other positions in the store as well.
I: That's good. Can you tell me (about) your previous work experience?
A: I worked as a clerk at 7–Eleven for one year. Before that I worked in my country at my parents'
grocery store. I had many responsibilities such as: ordering merchandise, stocking shelves, and
waiting on customers.
I: I see. Are you looking for a part time or a full time position?
A: I'm looking for a part–time job because I go to the Adult School to improve my English.
I: Customer...show more content...
Not academic classes and lectures, but living together, and making friends and taking part in some
outside activities, but not too many. And we tried to show them what we had learned about how to
organise your work, so as to do justice to a range of different subjects. And to let them know the
points at which they needed to make choices. And to know that we – students in the year senior to
them, were friendly and really wanted them to do well.|
7| Miss Lam| Sounds good. That kind of responsibility can be intimidating if you are dropped into it
without any sort of assistance – especially if you are the first member of your family to get into
University.| | Felix | Yes indeed it can. That was what happened to me. My parents were entirely
supportive, but they simply had no idea what the experience of University study was like. It took
me several months to find my feet. That's why I was keen to get involved in the orientation project.|
8| Miss Tam| So what do you get out of your involvement?| | Felix| As I said, I learned how to
identify the problems, and to talk about them in terms that newcomers to the University could
understand – or at least, I got to be much better at it! It's actually quite a difficult thing to do.|
9| Mrs. Smith|
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Martin BuberвЂ™s Dialogic Communication Essay
Martin Buber's Dialogic Communication
Dialogue is more than talking. It is not the straightforwardness of talking to or at, rather it is
communicating with or between. It is "a relation between persons that is characterized in more or
less degree by the element of inclusion" (Buber, 97). Inclusiveness is an acknowledgment of the
other person, an event experienced between two persons, mutual respect for both views and a
willingness to listen to the views of the other. These elements are the heart of dialogical relations. In
this paper I will examine Martin Buber's theory of communication, its relevance to my life and the
critiques of the theory.
At the core of Buber's theory is a distinction between dialogue and monologue. Dialogue is...show
more content...
Important to dialogic communication as well is the "narrow ridge". This is the place in which views
from both parties to the conversation can be viewed. A kind of lookout tower or observation post in
which both persons get as close to the others views with out actually taking them as their own in
order to understand the other. It is not a place in which conversation participants meet and
compromise their beliefs to appease the other. "The narrow ridge requires a balancing of concern for
self and other in proportionate amounts for what is needed by the situation..." (Arnett, 173).
To avoid misunderstanding, dialogue needs to be defined by what it is not. Dialogue is not
technical dialogue, chit chat, loving or liking the other, equality, weakness or compromise.
Technical dialogue is a byproduct of modern society. It arises out of a need to understand
objectively. It is different from real dialogue because Buber states dialogue is subjective (Arnett, 6).
Chit chat is monologue disguised as dialogue, the need to communicate something for the sake of
having their own thoughts and ideas heard, not to learn, not to influence, not to come to
understanding with another (Arnett, 6). Dialogue does not happen just because you like or love
someone. In fact, it can happen between persons who dislike each other very much as long as they
can

Theme Of Dialogue In The Necklace
Dialogue can have major effects on the mood and tone of the story and they can change how !. In
this essay, i will talk about how Dialogue can majorly impact the mood, tone, and characters of the
Bet and the Necklace. They both have different! and story yet their dialogue affects the tone, mood,
and characteristics of the story.
In The Necklace, by Guy De Maupassant the author uses different dialogue and words to express the
attitude.mood and tone of the character's voice which can affect how the character Mathilde and
their husband. In the short story of The Necklace, When Mathilde meets Madame Forestier again
after years of working and repaying the necklace, The dialogue shows the expression each character
had. "Oh! . my poor Mathilde, how you have changed! . ."
"Yes, I've had some hard times since I saw you last; and many sorrows . . . and all, on your
account." "On my account! . How was that?". The Author uses exclamation marks and dots to
represent yells and pauses of the dialogue which gives more emotion to the characters,This dialogue
shows that Madame Forestier is concerned about Mathilde and the dialogue shows Madame
Forestier's emotion of surprise/mild anger when Mathilde says that her misery was on her account by
using exclamation marks and questioning Mathilde. The author uses dialogue to show the mood of
the characters by using exclamation marks and dots to show the dialogues pauses.
In the Bet, by Anton Chekhov, the author uses dialogue choices that

Interfaith Dialogue And Ecumenism
What is interfaith dialogue and what is ecumenism? Ecumenism refers to the movement towards
religious unity among Christian denominations while interfaith dialogue is a process that seeks to
achieve respect and mutual understanding between people of different religions. The purpose of
dialogue is to come to an understanding of the other, not to determine whether they are good, bad,
right or wrong according to Lindahl (2004). Pope Paul VI in Ecclesiam Suam added that before
speaking we must take great care to listen not only to what people say, but more especially to what
they have it in their hearts to say. Only then will we understand them and respect them. Nemer
(2007) added that the fundamental attitudes that need to be found for dialogue are respect, openness,
listening, humility and the common search for truth.
According to Swidler (1983), there are ten rules for interfaith dialogue....show more content...
Have a good grasp of our own tradition – when engaging in dialogue a person needs to bring with
them a deeply lived experience of their own tradition to be able to share its fruits with others.
2. Come to dialogue in order to learn and grow, not to change the other – Each person who enters
into dialogue needs to come with an openness to learn and to change in their own attitudes and
perceptions, not out of a desire to change the other. In this way, all those who participate will be
changed in some way as a result of the dialogue.
3. Be willing also to help your own faith community to grow and change – Since dialogue is a
corporate activity, it is necessary that each person enters into dialogue not only across faith lines but
also with other members of their own faith community, to share with them the fruits of interfaith
dialogue. In this way, the whole community can eventually learn and change, gaining ever more
perceptive insight into reality.
4. Be honest and sincere and assume that others are equally honest and sincere – Real dialogue is
built on mutuality and

Dialogue As A Form Of Communication
In the last fifteen years or so, dialogue has become an important topic of discussion in the offices,
workplaces and even in our neighbourhood. As a result we ask ourselves what we really mean by
organisational dialogue. According to William Isaaacs
During the dialogue process, people learn how to think together – not just in
The sense of analysing a shared problem or creating new pieces of shared
Knowledge, but in the sense of occupying a collective sensibility, in which
The thoughts, emotions, and resulting actions belong not to one individual,
But to all of them together. (William Isaacs, past director, MIT's Dialogue Project)
The work dialogue stems from the Greek roots 'dia'...show more content...
"Culture engineering approach" (see palmer and handy 2000) is also the name given to the top down
in which it as presumed that the top management of the company or an organisation has thorough
knowledge of ideal values, behaviour and standards which is expected of every organisational
member so that they achieve the goals set by the organisation. Hence It can be said that top
management have the ability and right to create, uphold and bring the desired changes in the
organisational culture. The same can be achieved through various human resource interventions such
as reward management, organizational development, communication strategies, training,
management by objectives and performance management ((Armstrong 1990; Thompson & Mabey
1994;Thornhill et. al.,2000). In a case study (Akmal putra sniba 2003) done on british airways
various questions were asked to the management regarding the various approaches adopted by the
organisation to change the organisational culture. As a result it came out that top down approach
was adopted by british airways in which human resource interventions were organised, adding to that
mangers gives training to employees to make peoples value the focal point. Hence we can say that
dialogue helped them to change their organisational culture for better communication between the
management and the employees. Other approach that is bottom up which means that the local
members participate in decision making regarding the strategies

Dialogue in Martin BuberвЂ™s Book: вЂњI and ThouвЂќ
Martin Buber's "I and Thou" delivers a philosophy of private dialogue as it describes how personal
dialogue can outline the character of reality. The book's main theme is that life could also be
outlined by the manner in which people tend to interact in dialogue with one another, with nature,
and with God. According to Buber, a person might have two attitudes: I–Thou or I–It. I–Thou is a
subject–to–subject relationship, whereas I–It is a subject–to–object relationship. Within the I–Thou
relationship, people are conscious of one another and acknowledge their existence. They actively
participate in a conversation resulting in unity. However, in the I–It relationship, people view one
another as being made up of detailed qualities, and perceive themselves as only a part of a world
that contains things. I–Thou is a mutual relationship of support, whereas I–It is a relationship of
disconnection and being separate. Buber discusses that a person might attempt to change an I–Thou
relationship to an I–It relationship, or the other way around. However, according to Buber, when a
subject is studied as an object, the subject is no longer a Thou, but instead becomes an It. Therefore,
the subject which is examined as an object is the It in an I–It relationship. The subject–to–subject
relation affirms every subject as having a unity of being. Once a subject matter becomes an I–Thou
relation, it involves the subject's whole being. Thus, the I–Thou relation is an act of selecting, or
being

Strengths And Weaknesses Of Dialogue
Introduction
Dialogue is a form of writing that has been used for over five millennia. Well known philosophers
and as Plato and Confucius also used the dialogue. The research question of this paper is: Why did
Plato and Confucius choose to use a dialogue when writing some of their works? As a foundation
this paper will compare works of the two and look for common ground.
The strengths and weaknesses of dialogues will be discussed. Understanding why they used it and
the benefits and drawbacks will help a writer to make the choice whether or not to write his work as a
dialogue.
Methodology
To gain a greater understanding of the written dialogue TheAnalects and the The Republic will be
studied. They are widely known as influential works and will...show more content...
There is even a description of the setting. In contrast to Confucius writings; it starts: "I went down
yesterday to the Piraeus with
Glaucon the son of Ariston, that I might offer up my prayers to the goddess; and also because I
wanted to see in what manner they would celebrate the festival..." (The Internet Classics
Archive http://classics.mit.edu/Plato/republic.mb.txt) First of all there is a time being mentioned.
This mentioning of time is a double–edged sword. It can be viewed as enhancing the realism, as
Plato living at the same time as Socrates might say that he describes an actual happening. It is even
easier to relate to, because actual places are being included in the description. It is most likely
that the contemporary readers knew about these places and got a vivid picture in their mind. It
being written after Socrates death it can also be viewed as being a fabrication. In short this makes
The Republic a more controversial work. It is likely to steer up more feelings in the reader in
regards to that aspect.
Confucius dialogue is far from lacking virtues. In his writings we can see a reaching out for helping
his follow human. This is manifested in his

Dialogue Essays: Pap's Cabin
""It was kind of lazy and jolly, laying off comfortable all day, smoking and fishing, and no book nor
study." It was a lazy day in the cabin and I was kind of tired. Pap was gone last night so I waited, but
he didn't come so I slept. I woke up when the sun rose. Pap was not here. I am really tired and I don't
know what to do. A nap sounds nice. I was all alone in a place, with no houses or nothin. There was
only trees and grass. I turned around and I saw a pond, I don't know how deep and I ain't going to
find out. "Boo!" said Tom. "Haha, very funny," I said. "I see that you have found an island for us."
"What island?" I turned around and I saw a island. It had trees, a river and bushes and all sorts of
stuff! "Well, let's go then!"...show more content...
We looked in awe. It was beautiful! It smelled clean and fresh, not like the cabin. We walked up to
the side of it and Tom reached his hand out. "What are you doin?" I asked "I'm gonna touch it." He
replied "Me too." We touched it at the same time and it felt like 1 million needles hitting our hands!
"Ouch!" we yelped "Wait a minute." I said "What do you see?" I slipped behind the fall. "Come here,
you gotta see this!" "What? OH!" It was a cave, lit by a torch! We walked to the end and I look up.
There was a door. I pushed on it, but it didn't budge. We pushed together and I heard a crack. One
more time. It opened! Tom took the torch, and we climbed up the ladder that fell out. We walked up
and took one step and "CRUNCH!". We looked down and saw bones! "AH!" we screamed We held
the torch up and saw a glint of something in the back. I walked up to it and shown the light up at it.
It was a locked chest with gold around it! I looked around and there was a dead body, staring at us
with it's sunken eyes. " Ew! Wait, look!" I said "A key! I will get it." Tom replied He grabbed it and
put it in the chest. Click. "Hey! What are you doing!" Pap says. He slaps me across my face and I
fall onto the floor. He's drunk, once

Plato's Dialogue Essay
Plato's Dialogue
Dialogue: to exchange and discuss ideas in a frank and open manner to reach a mutually agreed
understanding. Dialogue on difficult issues is important to man. People can learn from others by
exchanging ideas and expressing how a philosophy or a stand on an issue affects them.
Comprehending the needs, feelings, problems and views of others can help create a better future
for all. Can we in a society that proclaims the right to free speech participate in a free and open
dialogue? Do we take the time to discuss important issues? Have we as a nation avoided talking
about difficult issues?
Plato's Symposium illustrates the need for open and frank dialogue. Engaging in dialogue that allows
each individual to express...show more content...
The world today has a complex communication system. However, much of this communication is
one way. Whether from the pulpit, television, radio or printed media it is just going in one direction
and the exchange of ideas is stymied.
Serious dialogue is not always a part of our everyday life. Distractions keep us from taking the time
to share our thoughts with others. Television and other forms of mass media preoccupy our time.
Fewer families are having meals together, each member of the family attending to their own busy
life. We talk about important life issues only when they have a direct impact on our lives.
Communication is essential to human existence. Humans are social beings dependent on each other
for survival. Without dialogue we cannot fulfill our basic need to share our wants, needs, and fears.
True dialogue in this nation has been hampered by partisan dogma and political correctness, which
in turn, suppresses the frank and open exchange of ideas. Many people withhold their inner
thoughts on many subjects because of the fear instilled by political correctness. People fear being
judged for what they say. A single mistake in phrasing can cost a person his reputation, career or
even possibly his life.
Plato spent much time contemplating the world around him. He spent much of his lifetime teaching
and taking part in dialogues. Dogma

Organizational Dialogue : Theory And Practice
Organizational Dialogue: Theory & Practice Spring Semester 2014
A dialogue means transformation of ideas, thoughts, and words between two or more persons.
However in an organizational environment, the vitality of dialogue is even on a lager side. A
dialogue is a route which can refine organizational environment for conducive management. A
dialogue tends to prevent various constraints and wastage of time, money and other efforts. This
notepaper focuses to explore the need and importance of a dialogue in an organization, and how
encouraging a dialogue in teams can lead to transformation of its culture that neither party in a
relationship nor any individual participant in a group/team or a network can produce solely. It will
demonstrate the meaning of dialogue and its significance in teams in organizations and also the
difficult tasks that are faced by firms. It will indicate that despite the challenges it is a remedy for
various organizational issues.
According to Mikhail Bakhtin (1981), dialogue is a power of discourse to increase understanding of
multiple perspectives and create myriad possibilities. According to Robust (1963), dialogue alters the
psychology of a group. The definition puts light on the fact that dialogue creates a new
understanding among individuals leading to better interpersonal relationships. A dialogue in a group
of people can help them talk together in order to explore their

Dialogue Between Romeo And Juliet
Act 2: Scene 2
Juliet: Romeo, Romeo, why do you have to be a Montague? Romeo, change your name, but if it's too
much trouble, I'll change mine.
Romeo: Do I tell her I am here? Or do I just keep hiding in the bushes?
Juliet: Do you have to be a Montague? Your name isn't who you are. Without Montague, you'll still
be mine, my love.
Romeo: I believe you. Just tell me you love me and I'll get rid of it.
Juliet: Who's there? Tell me!
Romeo: You asked for a name, but I don't know what to give; you don't like my name.
Juliet: I haven't heard many words fall from your lips, but already I know your voice. Is it you
Romeo?
Romeo: No longer Romeo, if the name displeases you.
Juliet: How'd you get here? If my family finds you here, they'll kill...show more content...
Juliet: And I would readily sooth it, but –
Nurse [from within]: Juliet!
Juliet: Just a minute! As I was saying –
Nurse [from within]: Juliet, what did I tell about spying on that nice man across the street?
Juliet: Um, just a minute, Romeo.
[Exit Juliet]
Romeo: Could it be true? Could she love me? It must be a dream!
[Enter Juliet]
Juliet: Sorry about that. What was I saying?

Romeo: You were saying nothing while I was proclaiming my love for you. Juliet, I love you!
Juliet: I love you too, my dearest Romeo, but this is all a bit sudden, so good bye.
[Juliet turns to leave]
Romeo: It is so easy to come to my love, but so hard to leave her.
[Enter Juliet]
Juliet: I keep trying to leave you out here, but time and time again I find myself drawn back to you.
Are you still there Romeo?
Romeo: Yes Juliet, I am here, and I will remain so, my love, until the light in your window has gone
dark.
Juliet: Then we may be here forever. It is past time that you leave. I will see you soon my love.
Romeo: I wish that I could be warmed by your heated body while you sleep.
Juliet: I wish the same, my Romeo. For the last time, good night.
Romeo: Sleep well, my love.

Martin Buber
Martin Buber – Dialogue
How do we know when communication has served to strengthen relationships between people and
expand individual viewpoints? When does communication reach beyond individual goals to promote
and develop a sense of community? We can attempt to answer questions like these by exploring
Martin Buber's theory of Dialogue.
I. Explanation of theory
According to Martin Buber, an essential building block of community is the concept of dialogue.
People often think of dialogue as merely script, or an exchange of words. Martin Buber has
presented dialogue as being much more than the exchange of messages and talk that takes place in
human interaction. He describes genuine dialogue as "...no matter whether spoken or...show more
content...
The conscience–oriented thinker will think in terms of a "good" outcome that maintains values
and ethics, whereas a strategist will think in terms of achieving individual goals without concern
for ethical practices (Arnett, 1986). Persons who are engaged in dialogue will participate in what
is called narrow ridge communication. The narrow ridge refers to a common ground between
parties. It is a point for participants to meet and share their views. The common ground in narrow
ridge communication is a place where participants are open to and can see the others viewpoint, it is
not a place where participants meet and compromise their beliefs to suit each other. The narrow
ridge is viewed as "a guide for the development of community which emphasizes the need to search
for genuine alternatives to extreme communicative positions" (Arnett, p. 43, 1986). The last
characteristic of true dialogue involves meaning. Dialogue allows participants to create new meaning
together and come to a mutual understanding. In dialogue, meaning is actually discovered between
persons rather than owned by each individual. This concept encourages one to recognize that there is
meaning beyond what is inside of him/her (Arnett, 1986).
The occurrence of dialogue may be misunderstood, so it is important to note that dialogue, in Martin
Buber's terms, is not the same thing as technical dialogue, conversation/chit chat,

Dialogue Example Essay
Marlene: Good afternoon Houston division, I am so excited to be here with you talking about an
exciting quarter for our division. We are so excited to introduce someone who is here with us for
the first time. Rachel Ross!
Rachel: Thank you Marlene. In March, I assumed the role of Vice President of Merchandising for
the Houston Division. I came from the Michigan Division so the heat and humidity has been quite a
change, but being with this division's team has been so amazing.
Marlene: Rachel, we are glad to have you here and excited about all of the energy you have already
brought to the team. First let's hear from our Division Controller, Akin Akanni, about how we did
financially in the Houston Division this quarter.
Akin: Thanks guys,...show more content...
He spoke of how rare it is to receive the amazing level service that he provided in other stores.
Thank you Brent for giving our customers highly satisfying service. We are so proud to have you on
our Houston team.
Marlene and Mike: Way to go Brent!
Rachel: Remember being Friendly and Fresh is how we drive our customer loyalty. And speaking of
Fresh...our fresh meat and seafood score was a 58.5% which was a 0.6% decline from Q4 and our
Fresh Produce score was a 55.4% which is a 0.5% decline compared to last quarter. District 5 showed
improvement in both with a 0.9% increase in their Meat and Seafood freshness score and a 1%
increase in their fresh produce score. District 2 also raised their Fresh Meat and Seafood score by
0.1%.
Some of our best performers with all of our priorities in quarter 1 were the following stores–
Stores 180, 300, 609, 38, 190 and 367 all met at least two of the four goals and store 156 has met
the goals for In stock, Friendly and Fresh Meat and Seafood! Way to go 156! That team there is
really dedicating their energy to doing what's best for the customer.
Marlene: Well Rachel we did have one of our best quarters for our Customer First Tracker. Our
goal is to get to 272 and we ended the quarter with a 266.7 which was a 5 point improvement. We
were the most improved division in the entire enterprise, so everyone let's have a handclap for

Dialogue In Oliver Twist
The dialogue in Oliver Twist by Charles Dickens and A portrait of the Artist as a young man by
James Joyce reveals aspects of the characters by showing each of the characters thoughts and
emotions through dialogue and the characters thoughts. Both passages use dialogue to show the
characters emotions, thoughts and how they react to the conflict in the passage to reveal aspects of
the characters.
In the passage, Oliver twist the author reveals the character aspects of Oliver twist by using dialogue
and the characters thoughts. Charles Dickens uses dialogue of Oliver Twist asking for more and his
thoughts and previous events to show how the character Oliver twist was forced and obliged to
rebelling their lunch system and asking for more...show more content...
James Joyce uses dialogue as well as the characters thoughts to reveal the main characters aspects
by showing how Stephen is homesick and longs for his mother yet is bullied by other kids for
this. In the text A portrait of the artist, The dialogue says "Wells said: O, I say, here's a fellow says
he doesn't kiss his mother before he goes to bed. They all laughed again. Stephen tried to laugh with
them. He felt his whole body hot and confused for a moment. What was the right answer to the
question? He had given two and still, Wells laughed at him... But he was not sick there. He thought
that he was sick in his heart". This reveals Stephens character aspect as very fearful and anxious
when being bullied and the author use dialogue and the characters thought to reveal the fearful and
home–sick character aspects of Stephen. Another character of which the author James Joyce uses
dialogue to reveal aspects is that of Fleming.The author uses dialogue to reveal Flemings aspects
as kind and a friend to Stephen. In the text, it said "What's up? Have you a pain or what's up with
you? don't know, Stephen said.Sick in your breadbasket, Fleming said, because your face looks
white. It will go away, Oh, yes, Stephen said". The dialogue reveals the character aspect of fleming
as friendly and kind to Stephen. The author, James Joyce uses dialogue to reveal the character
aspects of the stories characters. Using dialogue the author

Language And Dialogue In The Empty Family
15541157 – ENG10030 – Essay 1 –Title 1 TГіibГn's haunting use of language and dialogue in his
collection of short stories, "The Empty Family" leaves a lasting impact on the reader. Language and
dialogue are the most important tools of any writer when writing, as they influence a reader's
interpretation of themes and characters. TГіibГn effectively makes his words have an impact on the
reader and he achieves this by stimulating an emotional response to the things he says in his work,
i.e., his language and dialogue. Filled with the pain of personal experience, "Home was some graves
where my dead lay" (TГіibГn "The Empty Family" 34), the reader is at first overwhelmed by the
bleak and empty landscape presented by TГіibГn in his stories. He depicts...show more content...
Understanding the characters' personality can help a reader to understand what happens in the plot
better as a character's personality can have a lot to do with events that take place i.e., they can
influence or even cause them. In "One minus One" and "The Empty family" dialogue is inherently
limited. This fact is interesting though because the reader only gets the narrator's perspective of
what is going on in the story. The small amount of dialogue actually present in "One minus One"
portrays a bleak and hopeless scene in which the narrator's mother has been given a life expectancy
of "days, some days" (TГіibГn "One minus One" 12). The only words actually spoken between the
narrator and the other characters are about death and time running out for their mother. After waiting
until almost the end of the story for any dialogue, this is very bleak. However, confining the
language to death, odds of survival and operations, reflects the seriousness of the situation. Lines
like "we can make her very comfortable" render the reader quite the opposite, very uncomfortable, as
there is no doubt as to what will eventually happen. The narrator's internal response "There was
nothing more to say." brings a finality and an understanding of the hopeless situation. These internal
reactions used by TГіibГn appear as a kind of internal dialogue to the reader. The reader

Dialogue In Get Out
From the scoring to the story, "Get Out" knows how to allure the viewers. Dialogue consumes
most of the film. The dialogue was very clear and precise. The dialogue of the characters seemed to
be so crisp. Although, the sound effects lacked the authentic sounds in particular parts. In the first
scene, a pedestrian is walking down an isolated street before he is kidnapped and attacked. The
attacker places the victim in the truck, and closes the truck. When the trunk closes, it sounds like a
small click rather than a loud boom. In another scene, a dog is placed on the hardwood floor and
walks away, but there is not sound of the paws on the hardwood floor. It was minor, but very
noticeable. Quite a few of the scenes are outside which incorporates

Neil Alexander The Great Hero
What was it like to be side to side with the great Hero Odysseus; Dialogue
Narrator: Little Jimmy, Neil Alexander's grandchild had just walked into the room, and had sat on
grandfather's lap. Side to side Neil had served with the great Odysseus, through the battles with the
Trojans, and even in the shadowing cave of the Kyklopes.
Jimmy Alexander: Grandfather, Grandfather! My friends at school were talking about the great hero
Odysseus! I remember that once mother told me that you had served alongside the great hero? What
did you do with him! What adventures did the hero lead you on?
Neil Alexander: "Ahh well Jimny, let me think where to start: for you know being on the side of
Odysseus was very impactful– although I do remember almost...show more content...
He had always portrayed a round character, but here, the only things he displayed was
relinquishment. Although he eventually got off the island, he didn't do it in a heroic way, or in
anyway that anyone would want to tell in a story. He didn't fight Calypso or the island people of
Ogygia, instead, he begged in a way. He basically begged the Goddess Calypso to let him home. He
had always " (He) Sat on the rock shore and broke his own heart groaning, with eyes wet scanning
the bare horizon of the sea."( Page 85 line 64–67). I had always wondered why he did this, for his
name went down in history as the " Great hero Odysseus". After Calypso finally let us go, we ended
up on many other journey and hardships led by the gods.
Jimmy: Grandfather, to hear that you went through this breaks my heart. Oh what a burden this must
be to carry around the story of Odysseus. Do you not wish to forget about your journey, or what
type of person the hero, or man, is?
Narrator: With this question in mind, Neil decided to tell Jimmy the story of when he finally
returned to Ithaca.
Neil: Well son, when you travel for such a long period of time with another person or crew, you
soon get to know them. When I finally understood Odysseus, I knew that as a loyal crew member I
had to stay with him until death do us part on our

On the way home with Boo Radley, were walking,walking,and finally getting there. We walked up
the little steps, and I leaving Boo at his door, having the temptation to hug him. Boo shockingly
says, " Why did everyone talk bad about me?" Scout explaining confidently, " There was just false
communication between who you really were than the way they seen you as." ,as Scout is
grabbing her left elbow. Boo looking down with the expression of weakness. Scout shouts
engagingly, "Hey what you doing tomorrow?" sitting on his stairs and smiling gently at him. Boo
responding rapidly while managing to sit down on a base of a tree trunk, and saying " Um nothing
like usually," trying to make eye contact, " Why what are you doing tomorrow?" Scout Responding

Communication As Dialogue Analysis
The idea of creating a better world for our children is the final goal of communication as noble
love. This is an idea that every person can get behind, we all hope to leave the world better than
we found it and create an environment where the next generation can thrive in a way we never
could. By using dialogue to help us transcend ourselves we can create a new and improved social
world for the next generation to live in . This idea is clear in Baxter's essay Communication as
Dialogue. Baxter explains that the dialogue we engage in creates the social world we live in and
the sense of self that we carry. We use dialogue to communicate the different experiences we have;
these experiences are what makes us who are. When we compare our experiences

In essays done by Ernest Hemingway and Raymond Carver, the dialogue is utilized to help create
the story. In two completely different short stories called 'Hills like White Elephants" and
"Cathedral" dialogue helps bring these stories a little bit closer, and explain them a little bit
better. The authors could have used various ways to write the dialogue. They could have used
simple or complex language, interpret emotions, advance the plot, and used specific styles. In
the short story Cathedral, Carver uses dialogue to separate what was happening in the narrator's
head and what was happening outside of his head. The dialogue only happened when Robert
came into the mix really. It was also told in a simple manner since they were talking in a day to
day kind of slang such as "Bub, I'm more a Scotch man myself" (Carver, 141). Carver mainly used
the dialogue to advance the plot. An instance where he advanced the plot was when he was looking
at Robert's eye, then said "Let's get you a drink" which carried on as an action throughout the story
(141, Carver). In the end, one can really see that the author tied the story up with the dialogue. The
last sentence of the story proclaimed "It's really...show more content...
He does this by transitioning from "It stopped at this junction for two minutes and went on to
Madrid." to "What should we drink?"(273, Hemingway). Another thing to be noticed is that the story
uses complex language. The Spanish language and the imagery, makes you think of where they are
instead of telling the reader up–front. Quotes such as "Dos Cervezas" make it apparent that the story
isn't all simple (273, Hemingway). Quotes like "They look like white elephants" make us wonder
what she is referencing towards (274, Hemingway). In this story the dialogue also interprets
emotions such as "And if I do it you'll be happy and things will be like they were and you'll love
me?" (275,

Dialogue In Essay

Recomendados

Recomendados

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais de Paper Writing Service Superiorpapers

Mais de Paper Writing Service Superiorpapers (20)

Último

Último (20)

Dialogue In Essay