Fahrenheit 451 Essays

Fahrenheit 451 Technology Essay
In Ray Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451, the society's technology driven world leads the people to lose
their own sense of curiosity. Without the ability to think, the people living in this society live in a
mindless state, as a person with curiosity is able to start asking questions. Furthermore, the people's
minds are only focused on technology, which leads them to isolation from a real conversation that
does not include senseless meaning. The people's isolation withholds them from outside contact,
leaving him or her with an impression of loneliness that they cannot seem to comprehend. Isolation
prevents a person from growing and going through experiences that would make him or her feel
more connected with the world. Yet, Montag comes out of...show more content...
Not only does technology lead the society's people to live a life of isolation, but technology leads
the people into feelings of loneliness. The inhabitant's self–centeredness, along with isolation, causes
them to lose their sense of curiosity and knowledge; which induces feelings that they cannot quite
seem to understand. In order to push aside their insecurities, they turn to technology to drown out
their thoughts, which prevents curiosity to occur. Another cause for feelings of loneliness, is
people's lack of affection towards one another. For example, even though Guy Montag and Mildred
are married, they do not share a deep emotional connection with each other or affection like married
people usually do. In Fahrenheit 451, Montag asks Mildred when did they first meet, but Mildred
does not have any idea according to the dialogue, "When did we meet, and where?" [Asked
Montag]... "I don't know," [Mildred] said... "Funny, how funny, not to remember where or when
you met your husband or wife" (Bradbury 40). If both of them were to have a meaningful
relationship with affection, they were sure to remember where they met in the first place. Also,
instead of having normal conversations, Mildred always isolates herself from Guy using her
"seashells" and the "parlor walls". Montag then has no one to
Schwanebeck 3 talk to according to the quote when Montag says, "Nobody listens anymore. I can't
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Fahrenheit 451 Essay
Ray Bradbury, the author of Fahrenheit 451, uses his unique writing style to bring his readers to a
dark, post–apocalyptic American society that consists of government takeover, book burning, and
complete censorship. Bradbury criticizes today's society by bringing attention to the many faults we
as a society have, such as highlighting our attachment to technology and our inability to have a
meaningful human connection. People have lost touch with actual human interaction and would
rather spend time on their phones or other devices wasting away their life.
The novel's questionable protagonist, Guy Montag, is one of the many firemen who takes pride in
his job, but is not entirely sure why he does what he does. Instead of extinguishing fires like the 21st
Century firefighters, Guy and his crew create fires to burn books. The temperature at which paper
burns is 451 degrees Fahrenheit, hence the title of the novel.
In Fahrenheit 451, the government controls its citizens through fear and intimidation. The futuristic
government reins power by getting rid of anybody who goes against, or speaks out against their
power. One method they use to intimidate people is the mechanical hound....show more content...
Citizens are brainwashed by the government, forcing them to act and think the same,
consequently controlling their daily lives and basic functioning. "Not everyone is born free and
equal, as the Constitution says, but everyone is made equal." (58) Day after day, the population
lives the same bland and ordinary lives. The men go to work, and the women stay home and
watch TV. Those who go against that social norm are seen as rebels and are treated as such.
Clarisse finally begins to see that others were pressuring her to be someone she was not. "I'm
antisocial they say. I don't mix. It's so strange. I'm very social indeed.

Essay on Fahrenheit 451: Happiness?
Fahrenheit 451: Happiness?
Fahrenheit 451 is a novel of little happiness. Society as a whole has become content with watching
television and wasting away their lives, while a few individuals ponder the true meaning of life and
happiness. Bradbury throughout the book depicts what our world could become, and almost sends a
warning to the reader on how to avoid this unfriendly fate.
The society that is portrayed during this novel is neither happy nor sad. The citizens are glued to
their "walls", or gigantic televisions, and live a life that is remembered by nothing of importance.
True happiness as a society in this novel is the idea of living with a sitcom family, and the dream of
adding more wall size televisions. People do not...show more content...
Happiness in our society is harder to find than in the society of Fahrenheit 451, but once achieved, it
is a true happiness, one which grows upon its seeds, and sprouts a great and fulfilling life for that
person. The average citizen in our society believes themselves to be happy, but in reality, they too are
replacing their true desires and childhood dreams with superficial entertainment and mindless
activities, which resembles the society which is portrayed in Fahrenheit 451.
Throughout the book, Bradbury blatantly shows his viewpoint on the issue of happiness.
Through Montag, Bradbury creates a character which resembles himself, and builds upon the
character as the novel progresses. Starting off with a fireman who believes in his work and thinks
to be happy, Bradbury captures the mindset of every citizen in Fahrenheit 451, as well as some
from his own life. By the end of the book, Montag is a runaway who sees the true power of
imagination and books, and witnesses the ultimate destruction of a city that was scared to feel.
Bradbury wants readers to adopt the values of reading and thinking, and shows the possible future of
a country gone astray. He believes that censorship takes away the happiness of people, and forces
them to conform into a life of worthlessness. I think that while Montag is Bradbury's developing
character which truly shows the power of thought, his self–modeled character is Faber. Faber
believed happiness to be the quality of

Fahrenheit 451 Essay On Knowledge
"Knowledge is more than equivalent to force!" As understood by Dr. Samuel Johnson, knowledge
has an immense power and vast potential. Something as seemingly simplistic as the understanding of
the concept of knowledge is often underestimated, it not only has the ability to help individuals, but
hurt them. Though it is not physical, it has the capacity to cause more pain than any weapon, but
simultaneously heal the deepest of wounds. Knowledge is defined as the awareness of or familiarity
with a concept, gained through experience, fact or situation. In the novel Fahrenheit 451 knowledge
refers to being aware of the society you live in, it 's flaws and it's successes as well as the control
media now has over the population. It is the...show more content...
With technology is where Mildred finds herself feeling most at home. Through her family in the
walls and her "Seashells" she is ignorant to the society around her. The first introduction of
Mildred is her being passed out, with the shells in her ears when Montag arrives home. For the
first time, Montag is slightly more enlightened on the world around him, as ideas such as dew on
the grass in the morning, the existence of a man in the moon, and his own happiness are
introduced to him by a seventeen year old girl named Clarisse. These ideas are the first taste Guy
has of true knowledge, and the effects of the information are seen through his relationship with
Mildred. Towards the beginning of the novel, this separation is minor, and manageable. Guy
attempts to discuss the events of the night prior, which included his wife's overdose, and his
concern for her. While he discussed his concerns "She was quite obviously waiting for him to go.
"I didn 't do that," she said. "Never in a billion years." (Bradbury 17) This, is the first instance where
we
Andersen 3 see Mildred's frustration with Guy over his knowledge. She is angered by his ideas as
she does not understand how she is being controlled by the media around her,and has no memory of
the event happening. Her lack of interest in anything but media causes her to push Guy away further,
insulting him and complaining about their lack of a fourth parlour wall, saying that "It 's only two
thousand dollars, [and]

Comparisson and Contrast: Fahrenheit 451 Essay
Rachael Rowe
Mrs. Daniel–Kopp
English 3U1–04
April 4, 2012
Society Affects Individuals
Society has a powerful influence over individuals' actions, but that power and influence is not
carried over to an individuals' mindset. In the novel Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, the two
characters Faber and Beatty have very similar personalities. Though the way of society has
drastically influenced how each responds accordingly to social standards. Faber has followed the
path that society has paved for him, but he wants to be the man that can help change society's
view of books. Beatty is fulfilling his duties as fire chief, and is seen as a power head, though he
may not be as happy as society depicts him to be. Both characters are well read,...show more
content...
In this quotation Faber is encouraging Montag to take the risk of rising against societies standards,
and informing him that if you "lose" on your way to a certain goal, remember that you were
passionate about something that could make a difference in the way of society. In conclusion, Faber
follows the expectations of society but in his mind he desperately wants to go against his actions
and help to fight for books. His state of mind has not been affected by society as he is a well read
individual, perceives society as uneducated and mindless, as well is capable of teaching Montag
effectively.
Societies influence on citizens affects their actions, not how they perceive the world. Beatty
believes that the way of society is how it should be; citizens perceive him as an authority figure that
is content in the way society functions. Beatty and Faber are similar in the sense that; they are both
well read, perceive society in different ways and both teach Montag using different techniques. First,
Beatty is proven to be well read because he quotes many authors, but also shares his opinion that
books are contradictory; "What traitors books can be! you think they're backing you up, and they
turn on you." (97). This quotation demonstrates Beatty's opinion of books; he believes that what is
written in books contradicts itself and leaves

Fahrenheit 451 Synthesis Essay In the book Fahrenheit 451, author Ray Bradbury describes a
futuristic society in which it is normal for an average individual to shun and absolutely loathe
books. The main character, Guy Montag, works as a fireman, and his job description consists of
burning books instead of preventing fires. Television is a major topic in this book, and for the most
part, is portrayed as an extremely obsessive and deleterious item. Today, in American society
however, television is a much more positive thing, and has a lot to contribute to a healthy, connected,
and well informed society. In American society, television can save lives instead of destroying them.
Tim Leberecht, a well–reputed blogger and columnist,...show more content...
"Televised events like the Super Bowl, the Olympics and the World Cup give us a rare
opportunity to share a moment in time with the world," proclaims Tim Leberecht of
www.designmind.com (Leberecht). With our busy lives, we almost never take out time to spend
with our loved ones, and these televised events are when the majority of people meet up and have
fun. "Millie? Does the White Clown love you? Does your 'family' love you, love you with all
their heart and soul, Millie?" Montag asks Mildred (Bradbury 77). Guy Montag is questioning
his wife out of desperation, and is extremely curious to know if she believes that her fake TV
family really loves her. From this we can see that he is truly disappointed with life and his wife's
immoral addiction to television. We must keep in mind that our society today is not as dumbed
down and obsessed with fake parlor shows that spread real, tangible people apart as Mildred is. TV
today is a source of knowledge and learning, and creates the perfect circumstances and settings for
the getting together of the people that really matter the most. One of the most important aspects of
television is its ability to strengthen democracy and teach the law. "Seventy–two percent (of the US
population) learn about elections and candidates from TV news," states www.designmind.com
(Leberecht). TV brings us information that is essential to maintaining our freedom and our
guaranteed

Anyone that has read the novel, Fahrenheit 451, by Ray Bradbury, can see that the type of society
that they live in, is very unique compared to ours. The quality of life we have, relies on how we
choose to live. The way we live our life, affects how we are remembered. Throughout this essay,
you will learn how having quality in life, requires leisure time. Our society has evolved very much
over time. The technology, has impacted it greatly. With technology in our lives, we find ourselves
'glued' to our electronics. Now, the question is, what does social media provide us? In Wu's article,
he states, "The devices we use change the way we live much faster than any contest among genes."
Meaning, we rely on these devices to make us happy, and resort to them when we are bored.
Similarly, in Castells article, he says, "Media often report that intense use of the Internet increases
the risk of isolation, alienation, and withdrawal from society." However, the article also says that
social media has actually "increased sociability, civic engagement, and the intensity of family and
friendship relationships, in all cultures." Answering the question, we actually get something out of
using social media. We are allowed to communicate with...show more content...
They did not know that there was a time without it. When you are reading through the book, you
learn that the kind of characters are all very clueless, ignorant, and carefree. The government is
very controlling. For example in Bradbury's book, they firmen say, ""You know the law," said
Beatty. "Where's your common sense? None of those books agree with each other. You've been
locked up here for years with a regular damned Tower of Babel. Snap out of it! The people in those
books never lived." They basically had 'dumbed–down' their society. Everyone's lives revolves
around violence, comedy, and their televisions. They are missing very important elements. They
need detail and information in their

Fahrenheit 451: An Analysis
Shyron Rodgers
In Fahrenheit 451 certain people were very different from regular people that you would usually
talk to. Montag, was one of the smartest people in the book, He would always talk like he could see
the future. People thought he was crazy. He was also a firefighter. In there world there meaning of
firefighters are totally different. Instead of putting out fires they start fires.
If anyone was to start a fire now they would have got put in jail. That was a job for them to do.
They would set fire to anything that people called them to do. They mostly burned books and stuff
like that instead of houses and other things. He had a wife named Mildred that he would always
talk to about what he thought would sooner or later happen later in the future. He would tell her that
there was going to be tall , huge buildings everywhere and there was going to more advanced
technology.
Montag also did not believe in most of the low tech machines that they at their present time. He
thought the most of the high tech machines would be best and would soon be...show more content...
There questions and actions might have cause the others to face the difficult questions that their
culture is designed to distract them from. For that reason in the society of Fahrenheit 451 people who
express their individuality found themselves social out casts at best, and at worst in real danger.
Clarisse McClellan represents free thought and individuality. She's unlike anyone else Montag knew.
She has little interest in the thrill–seeking of her peers. She'd rather talk, observe the natural world
firsthand, and ask questions. She soon disappears (and is probably killed). Fahrenheit 451's society
is set up to snuff out individuality–characters who go against the general social conformity Clarisse,
Faber, Granger, and Montag do so at great

What Is The Conclusion Of Fahrenheit 451
Fahrenheit 451 is an important book about the perception of the future if books were inaccessible.
This book is also a valuable piece of literature because it explains to the readers that after reading a
book you can gain more knowledge and everyone else.
This book displays how our futuristic world would be without all the books in the world being
accessible to us. "You don't have to burn books to destroy a culture; just get people to stop reading
them." The destruction of books shows how the authoritative people are trying to manipulate their
nation's thoughts and the past. 'We must all be alike. Not everyone born free and equal, as the
constitution says. But everyone made equal... a book is a loaded gun in the house next door." This
quote from Beatty indicates that they do not want their people to know about history and they want
everyone to see the same things, hear the same things, and do the same things. These characters all
believed in living the same lives oblivious to the world before them.
In Fahrenheit 451 they have televisions, radios, robots, and bigger technology to displace their
interest in books. "It's not books you need, it's some of the things that were once in books. The
same things could be in the 'parlor families' today. The same infinite detail and awareness could be
projected through the radios...show more content...
This book also describes Montag's inner conflict with himself, how our society would drastically
change without information provided in books, and the difference in technology we would face in
the future. In the end this book teaches us how important it is to keep books around until the end
on time so we don't repeat the past or keep our people as smart as they can be because books impact
our lives every single

Fahrenheit 451 Characterization
In his novel, Fahrenheit 451, Ray Bradbury alludes to the Book of Ecclesiastes, a book from the
Hebrew Bible that discusses the philosophy of life, to illustrate the development of Montag's
characterization, to explain the corruption of man, to expose how the people in Montag's society are
being

Fahrenheit 451 Writing Style
The author's style is unique to his own work, but contains elements similar to others work. Ray
Bradbury's style in Fahrenheit 451 is one that is different from many other novels for similar
audiences. Bradbury uses many different effects and techniques to create a style that is very
different from the styles of other authors. Bradbury uses certain techniques of writing very
differently. Bradbury wrote the book using a varienty of sentence lengths and structures, but used
many long, continuous sentences, such as "Montag did not look back at his wife as he went
trembling along the hall to the kitchen, where he stood a long time watching the rain hit the
windows before he came back down the hallin th gray light, waiting for the tremble to

Fahrenheit 451 By Ray Bradbury: An Analysis
In the book, Fahrenheit 451, Ray Bradbury mentions a lot about TV replacing books. Ray's
predictions were correct about technology taking over books. Most people read online now on
their kindles, iPads, iPhones, laptops, or a device that connects to the internet. Even at our school
we use audio books. Mr. Bradbury was right to fear the replacement of books with technology.
More and more kids are finding less interest in reading. With the growth of technology, kids are
finding this more important and procrastinate on assignment, such as reading. There is pros and
cons to technology and the replacement of books is most likely the worst. Reading is not
appropriately valued in today's society anymore. People do not care to read anymore they

In Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, we can see a lot of things wrong with the society, things that
most people think could happen to us, but is it really that unrealistic? Ray Bradbury didn't think so
when he wrote it because he was writing about his own time period, shortly after WWII, but the
themes he wrote about are still present today. In the novel Fahrenheit 451, Ray Bradbury criticizes
illusion of happiness, oppression, and loss of self, not only his fictitious society, but our society in
real life, too.
One of the themes he criticizes is illusion of happiness. An example of this is on page 4, where it
says "... the fiery still gripped by his face muscles, in the dark. It never went away, that smile, it
never ever went away, as long...show more content...
They throw the books down the stairs, pile them up, and pour kerosene everywhere. Not only were
they willing to burn the books, but the woman as well, and the government doesn't care because they
set the rules, and they think the ends justify the means. The means being burning everyone and
everything, and the ends being that there are no books left, so they think it's okay to have unjust
control. Another example is on page 117, they make Montag burn his own house down and then tell
him he's under arrest. All of that just for owning some books? That's ridiculous, cruel, and overly
controlling. Page 33, another example, Montag asks Beatty "I–I've been thinking. About the fire last
week. About the man whose library we fixed. What happened to him?" Beatty then says "They
took him screaming off to the asylum," this really is a good example of oppression, a man owned
books, so they sent him to the mental ward of a hospital, and sometimes they send them to jail. It
shows how the government has cruel treatment just because they are in control, and that's how
some things are today. At school, for a small scale example, we aren't allowed to use our phones
between classes, it wouldn't hurt anything if we were allowed to, it wouldn't make it easier to
cheat, or break any other rules, yet we aren't allowed to do it just because they say so, and the
government, which has way more power, can, and does, do things just like this except on a much
larger scale.
Finally he

Analysis of Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury Essay
Analysis of Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury Imagine living in a world where you are not in
control of your own thoughts. Imagine living in a world in which all the great thinkers of the past
have been blurred from existence. Imagine living in a world where life no longer involves beauty,
but instead a controlled system that the government is capable of manipulating. In Ray Bradbury's
Fahrenheit 451, such a world is brought to the awareness of the reader through a description of the
impacts of censorship and forced conformity on people living in a futuristic society. In this society,
all works of literature have become a symbol of unnecessary controversy and are outlawed.
Individuality and thought is outlawed. The human mind is...show more content...
It was a time of book–burning and close panic, which left Bradbury in disbelief that "[we] would
go all out and destroy ourselves in this fashion'; (Moore 103). The writing of this novel was also an
opportunity for Bradbury to speak out against the censorship of written literature that was taking
place by showing the consequences of it. Bradbury believed that the censorship of books destroyed
important ideas, knowledge, and opinions and restricted the world from learning about the problems
of their culture. His writing came to show that without such knowledge, society could become very
passive, which would make it vulnerable to the control and mind manipulating techniques of the
government. Ironically enough, this book itself was subject to censorship on its initial release
(Touponce 125). These political, social, and military tensions of the 50's lent to Bradbury's own
tensions, calling him forth to alert the people of their own self–destructive behaviors. The setting in
which the story takes place has a significant effect on the theme expressed in the novel. The most
notable aspect of the setting is the time at which it is set. The time that Bradbury is trying to
illustrate is never simply stated, but rather implied and described through the lives of the characters
and the technology available to them. The existence of a "four–walled television'; (Bradbury 20) and
high–speed jet–propelled "beetle'; cars (Bradbury 9)

Fahrenheit 451 Essay Questions
Analytical Essay iCell is the newest, biggest, most expensive trend that everyone in town has. The
citizens are unaware of certain rules and policies that they agreed to over terms and conditions
when signing on to their iCell every morning. Almost how Bradbury criticizes the people's inability
to question. Although as shown in the story it only takes one person to realize and help others
reach reality. In the short story Agree to Disagree, the author criticizes how people like the main
character Mr. Nance, agree with terms and conditions before even reading them. This leads to
problems because he must take the prescribed pills that limit his ability to question. The town that
they live in has been taken over by "iCell" a company that has used corporate and technological
control to command the people....show more content...
By using Clarisse to show people's inability to question and Montag realizing how nobody ever
asks questions. When Clarisse questions Montag his reaction and realization is perfect, "'No, no'
he said. 'It was a good question. It's been a long time since anyone cared enough to ask. A good
question.'" (Bradbury 26). Montag probably thinks, why don't I get questioned like this from my
wife or my coworkers. Nobody has really questioned him like Clarisse just did and it shocks him a
little. At this point in the book, Montag is just beginning to realize that something is wrong with
society. As he continues to talk to Clarisse he starts to come out of his foggy state of mind and
begins to question as well. Clarisse also helps Montag realize when she says "we never ask
questions, or at least most don't; they just run the answers at you, bing, bing, bing, and us sitting
there for four more hours of film–teacher" (Bradbury 27). Clarisse knows that something is wrong
with their society because nobody ever asks questions they just get

Fahrenheit 451: Literary Analysis
When an author sits down to write a novel one of the most important questions is: "Where is the
story going to take place?". This is because the land can have an effect on what happens in the story
through culture, geography, or placement on the map. As stated in chapter nineteen of Thomas
Foster's How to Read Literature Like a Professor, "The places of poems and fiction really matter. It
isn't just the setting... it's a place and space and shape that bring us to ideas and psychology and
history and dynamism." (Foster, 182). Placement and geography take a front seat in the novel
Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury through country and city.
Guy Montag has trouble picturing what the countryside looks like, as the city is all he has known. His

Ray Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451 Essay
In the book Fahrenheit 451 the theme is a society/world that revolves around being basically brain
washed or programmed because of the lack of people not thinking for themselves concerning the
loss of knowledge, and imagination from books that don't exist to them. In such stories as the Kurt
Vonnegut's "You have insulted me letter" also involving censorship to better society
from vulgarity and from certain aspects of life that could be seen as disruptive to day to day
society which leads to censorship of language and books. Both stories deal with censorship and by
that society is destructed in a certain way by the loss of knowledge from books. Fahrenheit 451
involves such characters as Guy Montag, Mildred Montag, Captain...show more content...
In "You Have Insulted Me" a letter by Kurt Vonnegut, Jr. is another good example of
censorship in our own society. That relates to Fahrenheit 451 concerning censorship but there is
also a difference in Fahrenheit 451 compared to the "the letter" by Vonnegut. In
Fahrenheit the idea of censorship are no books what so ever because of the lack of society
reading, but in "the letter" books are denied to younger readers and the public because
of content, such as vulgarity, and sexuality. They both lack knowledge that is given but never fully
taken in and which makes them both a censored society/world. Censorship is widely used in our
society to prevent us from seeing or hearing things that could disrupt our surroundings. Is it right to
censor or not, its tough question and that question appears in Fahrenheit 451, The Letter, and our
own day to day life's. In Fahrenheit and The Letter they were censored to better the society without
knowing the true aspects of the life. Also in both stories it seems as though censorship is fear,
afraid of something that could be wonderful and even knowledgeable to society. In Fahrenheit 451
the lack of books later turns the book in an avalanche effect of conformity leading to

Fahrenheit 451 Morality Quotes
In the novel Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, the protagonist Guy Montag is portrayed as a moral
character, as once he is truly shown what morality is, and how the lack of ethics and thoughts
affects his society, he starts to think for himself more. In the novel, he is represented as the cause of
the lack of morality that his society has, since he burns book for a living, which is the only thing
that would save his society from being completely blinded. However, he starts to gain this moral
compass, and starts to truly think for himself more as the story progresses. Thus, Montag starts to
learn throughout the novel about morality, and gains his own sense of what is right and wrong, and
starts to truly believe and think...show more content...
This is shown in many parts throughout the story. For example, Montag starts to question how he
even met Mildred. He realizes as he thinks about this that he has no clue, as the distractions of
their society have blocked out this important thought, as well as many others. He asks Mildred if
she remembers, and she says no, saying "Funny, how funny, not to remember where or when you
met your husband or wife." Mildred is so detached from life itself because of all of her distractions,
from the 3–walled "family" to the sleeping pills she uses plenty of everyday. Montag realizes this
and comes to the realization that the society he lives in is too dead minded to have any unique
thoughts or original ideas. The reason he had even asked Mildred this question was because he has
started to think about the morals of his society earlier on. This was shown when Montag had to go
on a case for a house that had books within it. When the firefighters arrived to the house, they found
a woman with plenty of books. However, the woman decided to stay in the house, even though it
was going to be burned. None of the other firefighters

Creative Writing: Fahrenheit 451
The bright red fire truck sped through the streets filled with uniform, pale grey colored houses.
The wheels skidded to a stop in front of a house that looked just like the others, as Beatty violently
pulled the brake backwards. The men went tumbling backwards, as if the truck had just hit a brick
wall in front of them. "We're here guys. Get out." Beatty screamed over the roar of the sirens, with
a devilish smile on his face. He turned to see Montag's blanched face, eyes wide and mouth gaping
with surprise. Beatty knew Montag would be surprised to see his very own house through the
windows of the fire truck. They stepped out of the truck together, and stared at the house as the other
firemen set up torches around the perimeter of the house. Neighbors from up and down the street
opened their doors and windows, ready to watch the marvelous show ahead....show more content...
The crowd around them took a step back, and Beatty felt like the quarry of the lion, set free in the
Colosseum to feast the eyes of the spectators. "Why did you do it Montag? Why did you steal
those books?" Beatty sneered. He noticed Montag tilt his head to the side, as if he was listening
to someone else talk. Beatty swung his hand into the side of Montag's face, the force of the hit
causing them both to stumble backwards. A small green object flew out his ear, and Beatty gently
picked it up of the ground and held it up to his ear. He smirked as Montag shouted in protest. A
quick glance at Montag's fingers revealed that he had unlocked the safety on the flamethrower.
"Way to draw an audience Montag. What will you do now?" Beatty taunted. "Recite some more
poetry? You're only going to get yourself killed." Montag lifted the gun and pointed it straight at
Beatty's face. Beatty took a step closer, smiled, and held out his

Examples Of Irony In Fahrenheit 451
Fahrenheit 451 is a story about a fireman named Guy Montag. In this society, firemen, like
Montag, burn books, rather than put out fires. As one could probably tell from the previous
statement, examples of all types of irony could be found on every page in Fahrenheit 451, and
most of this irony helped to reinforce themes that the author tried to develop. There are three main
types of irony, verbal irony, dramatic irony, and situational irony. Verbal irony is when a character
says one thing but means a different thing. Dramatic irony can be defined as where the reader or a
character knows something another character does not. Finally, the last sort of irony is situational
irony which is a contrast between what the reader or a character expects and what truly happens. The
author of Fahrenheit 451 uses irony to develop themes in the book. A theme can be defined as an
underlying main idea. Some themes of Fahrenheit 451 that will be discussed are life versus machine,
hostility being the norm, and ignorance versus knowledge. This essay will attempt to connect Ray
Bradbury's use of irony to the themes that the author depicted....show more content...
If one doesn't know, Clarisse doesn't really understand her peers. They are reckless, they beat each
other up, and shout. Sometimes, when they drive cars at unbelievably high speeds, they even
accidentally run each other over. This is an example of situational irony because Clarisse dies by
getting hit by a car. A theme that this piece of irony helps develop is life versus machine because
Clarisse's life gets taken by a machine. In addition to Clarisse's death, examples that support this
theme are when Beatty dies by getting burned with flamethrowing technology, an innocent man gets
killed by the mechanical hound, and an old woman dying, trying to stop technology from taking over

Fahrenheit 451 Essays

Recomendados

Recomendados

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais de Paper Writing Services Reviews

Mais de Paper Writing Services Reviews (20)

Último

Último (20)

Fahrenheit 451 Essays