Essays Against Euthanasia

Ethics of Euthanasia Essay
As patients come closer to the end of their lives, certain organs stop performing as well as they use
to. People are unable to do simple tasks like putting on clothes, going to the restroom without
assistance, eat on our own, and sometimes even breathe without the help of a machine. Needing to
depend on someone for everything suddenly brings feelings of helplessness much like an infant
feels. It is easy to see why some patients with terminal illnesses would seek any type of relief from
this hardship, even if that relief is suicide. Euthanasia or assisted suicide is where a physician would
give a patient an aid in dying. "Assisted suicide is a controversial medical and ethical issue based on
the question of whether, in certain situations,...show more content...
Whether murder is done in a peaceful, non painful way or in a very gruesome, unimaginable way,
it is still considered murder. Physicians have no way of knowing 'what is best for the patient'
especially if that patient's terminal illness prevents them from speaking. Not only is assisted
suicide considered murder, it also goes against Physicians' Hippocratic Oath. "Hippocratic Oath:
An oath (or promise) all physicians must swear to uphold, regarding the ethical practices of the
medical profession" (Lee). By allowing doctors to stray from this oath, it will be easier for them to
aid in or carry out assisted suicides when it will never be entirely necessary for them to consider the
option. "In 2005, Texas doctors removed two patients from life support without advanced directions
and against the wishes of the patient's family" (Pawlick). By not legalizing assisted suicides, families
will be able to decide when their family member is physically unable to continue with the provided
treatments, but only when the patient themselves can no longer communicate their wishes and no
document stating how they should go about the situation has been left in their families possession.
Ethical issues are not the only problem. Some argue that euthanasia also creates issues from a legal
perspective. "One legal question is whether assisted suicide violates the Controlled Substances Act, a
federal law governing the distribution of drugs" (Lee). Such
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Arguments For And Against Euthanasia Essay
Euthanasia is the practice of ending an individual's life in order to relieve them from an incurable
disease or unbearable suffering. The term euthanasia is derived from the Greek word for "good
death" and originally referred to as "intentional killing" ( Patelarou, Vardavas, Fioraki, Alegakis,
Dafermou, & Ntzilepi, 2009). Euthanasia is a controversial topic which has raised a great deal of
debate globally. Although euthanasia has received great exposure in the professional media, there
are some sticky points that lack clarity and need to be addressed. Euthanasia is a divisive topic, and
different interpretations of its meaning, depend on whether the person supports it or not. While a
few societies have accepted euthanasia, there are...show more content...
The patient voluntarily wanted to end his life because he was suffering from Lou Gehrigs's disease
(Siu, 2008). Since then, the controversy over active euthanasia has remained an ethical dilemma for
healthcare providers, patients and their family members in America and the rest of the world. The
general public's belief is that, health–care providers have professional obligations to save the lives of
their patients regardless of their health status. The majority of the public feels that, healthcare
workers' involvement in the euthanasia practice is a betrayal of the "do no harm" oath. When a
healthcare worker is involved in either active or passive euthanasia, it can be viewed as a
disregard to this value. However, the proponents for euthanasia claim that a physician turning down
a suffering patient's request to end their life is also a violation to the "do no harm" oath (Siu,
2008). The right to die falls under patient's autonomy and the basic question is whether individuals
should be allowed to end their lives if they choose to do so (Sanders & Chaloner 2007). Those in
the healthcare sector grapple with this notion on a daily bases because they have to practice under
the codes of ethics guidelines. Nurses and doctors should be cautious in their practice as they balance
the patient's autonomy and their professional ethics and guidelines. Sanders & Chaloner (2007)
pointed out that nurses and doctors know that a patient's autonomy

Argumentive Essay Against Euthanasia
Euthanasia
The mind is a terrible thing to waste, stated by anti–drug commercials. We all will either appreciate
or underrate our life based on certain experiences we live through. Many go through dramatic
experiences that make life uncomfortable or more strenuous than surrounding patrons do. Religious
beliefs often affect the reasoning of decisions and the importance of life. Some people live in a
vegetable status since their body is still performing, but their mind is not. The government will not
allow their death since it is unconstitutional and deemed as murder. Euthanasia ends a life and is
exercised regularly overseas. The immoral act of euthanasia defies humanity and the purpose of life.
Some feel euthanasia needs...show more content...
Latest medical research results indicate the possibility that many brain–injured people have more
activity in their minds than anyone previously knew. The indecency alone should fulfill a person
contemplating euthanasia to be immoral. According to Ecclesiastes 8:8 ?There is no man that
hath power over the spirit to retain the spirit, neither hath he power in the day of death: and there
is no discharge in that war, neither shall wickedness deliver those that are given to it.? 1
Corinthians 6:20 further states ?For ye are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your
body, and in your spirit, which are God's.? This statement resolves that your life is important and
that the future lies in decisions you make and God allows. For the unbelievers the fact of
removing yourself from this world defies others? respect and feelings towards you. By allowing
voluntary euthanasia, the door will be open for involuntary euthanasia approval. One leading
medical ethicist, Professor Richard Hare, said more than twenty years ago, "We shall begin by
doing it because the patient is in intolerable pain, but we shall end up doing it because it is Friday
afternoon and we want to get away for the weekend.? Seeing any type of death except works by
God as normal would over time numb society causing life to be less important than some already
see it. Many laws pass without the consideration of the future. If euthanasia were legal, other avenues
would become legal

Argumentative Arguments Against Euthanasia
Euthanasia and assisted dying are one of the controversial topics that are highly argumentative for its
legalization in many countries. Through it is legal in some countries of Europe, few states in the
US, Canada, Japan, Australia is one of the countries that still against legalizing Euthanasia or
assisted Dying.Though once this option was legal in NT, reformation of law has caused it to be
illegal again.Discussion of this topic is prevalent in media which often fueled by the nonfrequent
prosecution of individual who becomes involved in the death of patients wanting death by lethal
drugs causing death(QUT,2017).Arguments against legalizing euthanasia in Australia has been
discussed in this essay.
Euthanasia is a deliberate intentional act of an individual to end the life of another individual in
order to relieve them from intractable suffering (QUT,2017). This term is often perceived in different
ways. Most common three includes – a)Voluntary euthanasia: performed to end one's life with their
consent, here the person is competent.For example; physician injects the suffering patient with lethal
substance after being requested (QUT,2017) b) Non–Voluntary Euthanasia: performed when the
person is not competent. For example; physician injecting the patient with lethal substance under the
unresponsive state in post–coma (QUT,2017) c)Involuntary Euthanasia: performed when a patient is
competent but has not requested their death wish. For example; performed when patiently is at

Does euthanasia assists patients to die with dignity?
From fresh to dying, is the humanity multiplies the development natural law. Along with medicine
progress and life enhancement, the people besides pay attention to eugenics, simultaneous starts to
pay attention to the euthanasia. Since this century 50 ages, regarding euthanasia, many countries'
medical arenas, educational world, and ethical groups have been arguing about the euthanasia
argument for many years, although many person of ideas have certain changed along with the time.
However, the traditional thought that the public opinion has huge influence on the average person.
In people's traditional ethics and morality, doctor's inherent responsibilities are to save impending
death and the wounded. However, it is difficult for many people to accept the fact that doctors help
the patients to implement lethal injection. Meanwhile traditional ethics, morality and kernel, love,
filial piety, righteousness, also requests the people to respect the life, to deeply love their life.
Euthanasia that is to take patients finish life immediately, which conflicts with the traditional ethics
and morality in representation. Therefore, to let people accept euthanasia will be difficult,
especially to let his own relatives die by euthanasia, to leave quickly, probably to be more difficult.
In the view of people's cognition deviation of euthanasia, this article based on the ethics elementary
theory to explain that euthanasia is to

Persuasive Essay Against Euthanasia
Euthanasia, also known as physician assisted suicide, is a worldwide controversy being discussed
to this day. While many oppose this strategy due to the fact that numerous consider this act to be
"manslaughter," or religious beliefs, they also believe that it will increase suicide rates in society;
however, euthanasia should be legalized worldwide because not only does it voluntary relieve an
individual from their suffering pain, it benefits those who have higher chances of living, and helps
the economy.
Euthanasia is a medical process that relieves an individual from their excruciating pain. According
to experts, "a person's pain cannot be controlled with even the best palliative care, or when a person
has lost all independence and control over his or her body, permitting euthanasia is the only
compassionate response." (Euthanasia Relieves Suffering, 2006, para. 1). This states that euthanasia
is the only solution at their own decision to stop their suffering faster as opposed to forcing them to
have a slow and painful death. In a study conducted in which terminally ill patients were interviewed,
a young woman claimed that "without a change in the law she may commit suicide alone. She was
in great pain, and could not find a place in a hospice." (J Med Ethics, 2006, para. 13). Although
patients are terminally ill that does not call for the hospital to take away their human rights to have a
choice on their own life as to whether they want to live or die. Those who

Thesis Statement Against Euthanasia
Title: Argue Against Euthanasia
Thesis Statement: The Philippine should not allow Euthanasia because it is form of murder
Problem: Should we allow Euthanasia in the Philippines?
Answer: No
1.Introduction
1.1 Argue against Euthanasia without Resorting to "Because God doesn't like it."
2.Against Euthanasia
2.1 killing of an innocent man or child.
2.2 it morally questionable to our society
3.Resorting to Religious Belief
3.1 god has the rights
3.2 only god may decide when we will die.
4. Problems
4.1 does not solve the problem
4.2 suffering
5. Conclusion
5.1 I conclude that we should not legalized the Euthanasia here in the Philippines.
Introduction:
People all knows that Euthanasia is the act of killing someone who is very sick...show more content...
All faith's offer meaning and explanations for death and dying; faiths try to find a place for death
and dying within human experience. God gives people life, so only god has the right to talk it away.
Human lives are important because God created them, Therefore human should be protected and
preserved whatever happens and therefore we shouldn't interfere with God's plans by shortening
human lives and the catholics are disapprove of Euthanasia. Religions are opposed to euthanasia for
a number of

Persuasive Essay On Euthanasia
Euthanasia is typically undertaken when an extremely sick person has lost the will to live and is
terminated to alleviate them from their suffering. The idea of physician assisted suicide has sparked
a debate on the ethical, economical, and social consideration of the act. As we approach a time
where physician assisted suicide becomes more and more politically and ethically charged,
lawmakers, physicians, and the public alike need to understand autonomy and respect the natural
functionings of the human body, even if the patient or the family of the patient asks for euthanasia.
Therefore, due to ethical and economical considerations, euthanasia should be outlawed throughout
the United States. The origins of physician assisted suicide trace back to the ancient Greek and
Roman days (Math and Chaturvedi). Before the ascendance of Christianity, physicians of that time
tended to support euthanasia. According to Dr. Ian Dowbiggin, a professor of history at the
University of Prince Edward Island, "In ancient Greece and Rome, before the coming of Christianity,
attitudes toward infanticide,...show more content...
Many senior advisers and medical doctors agree that euthanasia ends patient suffering at the end of a
person's life. "Americans should enjoy a right guaranteed in the European Declaration of Human
Rights – the right not to be forced to suffer. It should be considered as much of a crime to make
someone live who with justification does not wish to continue as it is to take life without
consent" (Girsh). This opinion applies to patients who are terminally ill and have no possible
medical remedies which could bring them back to a normal state. Some doctors have even gone so
far as to say that the Hippocratic Oath should be amended to allow for physician assisted suicide,
and even one clause of the Oath should be reviewed in the case of this medical

Arguments Against Euthanasia
A spoken word euthanasia of Daniel Callahan by self– determination is an adequate representation
of the human issue that faces not only a nation but as a world. In the self–determination, he expertly
points out the many misconceptions humanity has mad about the human. Some belief the euthanasia
to be restful, while others believe there can never be peaceful for any consequences for our actions
(Daniel, 344). Throughout this essay, I aim to not only argue against euthanasia but also to provide
some reasonable alternatives. Various changes to the euthanasia have become more apparent as
human issue and doctor find an innovated means to measure them. Many are direct consequences of
a euthanasia action. Euthanasia is a serious political, moral and ethical problem in these days. Most
people either strictly prevent it or decidedly favor euthanasia. After reading self–determination, I still
support and promote the legalization of euthanasia. I believe that all people deserve the right to die
with dignity. However, Callahan argued that euthanasia believes turning to four central category
debate such as self–determination, killing and allowing to die, calculating the consequence, and
euthanasia and medical practices. In this essay, I will discuss some arguments for and against
euthanasia.
First of all, self–determination gives people to decide their own beliefs about life and how they can
conduct their life. Callahan was asking the question, "what does it mean and how far should it

Arguments Against Euthanasia Essay
Arguments on Euthanasia In this paper, I will be presenting the opposing arguments on Euthanasia,
the controversial issue of terminally ill patients committing suicide with the assistance of a
physician. One of the main arguments for euthanasia is that people have the right to die. Many
people for euthanasia have the mindset that humans have the right to control his or her body and life
and therefore have the freedom to choose how, where and when they will die. This belief stems from
the idea of free will, which is a fundamental part of the human soul. Adding to this argument,
supporters state that other human rights include the right to die such as the right to life, which is not
the right to simply exist or to a life of minimum quality...show more content...
As for violating the patient's autonomy, supporters contend that to violate a person's autonomy
would be to violate that person's wishes but this is not the case of a person who does wish to die.
The belief that death hurts people stems from the idea that it prevents people from living the life
they could have. To supporters, people who request to be euthanized have a low quality of life and
acknowledge that their life will only get worse. A person who wants to die did not make that choice
because they had nothing to live for but because at some point they decided the pain was too much
to endure. The main argument against euthanasia is that it goes against the will of God. Opponents
of euthanasia claim the it is God who gets to decide who lives and who dies and to commit suicide
would be to go against the will of God. Opponents also argue that it was the philosopher Immanuel
Kant who said that rational human beings should be treated as an end in themselves and not as a
means to something else; Our worth is not dependent on anything. If we exist we have value despite
whatever condition that existence is in. Those against euthanasia also feel that euthanasia is against
the patient's best interest because the diagnosis may inaccurate and the patient is not terminally ill or
the patient may be unable to make a sound judgement regarding their

Essay about Anti Euthanasia
If someone is terminally ill, should a doctor be allowed, with consent from the patient and their
family, to give the person an overdose in order to end the person's life?
Being sick and weak has driven people to wish they were dead. People like to be strong and
powerful and able, and many cannot cope with reality once they lose the abilities they once had.
They become helpless and fragile and it is embarrassing for them to have others see them that way.
Some medical patients loose the drive to live. Certain doctors, such as Dr. Jack Kevorkian (who
helped approximately 130 people with 'physician–assisted suicide'), see the anguish this causes them,
and have interceded to help them achieve death by giving the patients overdoses of...show more
content...
It is hard to refuse a person death when all they see is suffering, but that doctor could be struck with
the knowledge that a person's life was in his hands, and he threw it away with one injection.
Physician–assisted suicide puts a humongous responsibility on doctors. If and when doctors are
given this responsibility–to advise families when their loved ones are beyond help, and to play the
deadly hand–it is putting a lot of power into their hands. They could be mistaken, and a wrong
diagnosis could lead to the murder of a savable person. Or, worse than that, they could tell the
family that all hope is loss because of a lack of time, staff, or resources, and the doctor may be too
proud to admit it, or he/she may think that it is a waste to invest in the elderly. They may always
state that the patient is going to die from their affliction and suggest euthanasia in order to save
their hospital the trouble of housing the sickly. Along with the patient being possibly savable,
doctors and family may give up on hope too soon. If a patient is told that he or she has six more
months to live with a bit of pain or weakness, he or she may decide to commit suicide before
letting nature take its course. This denies them any precious time that may be spent with friends
and relatives in their final days, and, however slim it might be, it leaves no chance for a miracle
recovery or discovering a medical error, meaning that the patient has a lot more time

Euthanasia
"You only get one life. It's actually your duty to live it as fully as possible." (Moyes, Jojo. Me
before you. Penguin Books, 2016). Life is a celestial object, and we are obliged to handle our lives
with prudence. Abdicating your life is vile and dissolute. Assisting in the termination of one's own
life is even more absurd; therefore, it should be hindered. Euthanasia should be stated illegal and
prohibited throughout the whole world, for it leads to disadvantageous long–term consciences
including distrusting the medical field and giving more power to doctors than what they deserve.
Usually, those who demand euthanasia are pressured by those around them including doctors, and
they are deceived by their depression.
Euthanasia devastate patients' trust in the medical field. If your teacher gave you the choice
whether to do your homework or not, what will you choose? Of course, you won't do your
homework because it is the easier choice. Human beings are inevitable to pick the obstacle–free
route; therefore, if doctors were given the choice to simply kill people whose cases seem
unpromising, they will select this choice. Doctors will be discouraged to research and create new
medicines. "What is the point? I can just painlessly and effortlessly kill them". Cures that could
extenuate pain will not be discovered anymore, and scientists would not even try to invent
cotemporary medicines. Moreover, accepting euthanasia is a breach of The International Code of
Medical

Euthanasia Essay : Euthanasia And Euthanasia
This is why Euthanasia is important and summarizing the research that I found on Euthanasia.
Euthanasia is important because there is a lot of arguments about Euthanasia. Some people support it
and some people do not support Euthanasia (Euthanasia and assisted suicide– Arguments).
Euthanasia allows people to be free from physical pain. It is the hastening of death of a patient to
prevent further sufferings (Euthanasia Revisited). The religious argument states God chooses when
human life ends. Euthanasia also causes mental suffering because they are in physical pain or they
are experiencing with terminal illness. It is a debatable issue. There are many different opinions on
Euthanasia. The topic that I am researching is Euthanasia. There are many different arguments for
and against Euthanasia. The four main types of arguments used by people who are against
Euthanasia are the religious argument, the 'slippery slope' argument, the medical ethics argument,
and the alternative argument (Euthanasia and assisted suicide–Argument. The pragmatic argument
and the ethical argument are the two main types of arguments used to support the practice of
Euthanasia and assisted suicide (Euthanasia and assisted suicide– Argument. The ethical argument is
that people should have the freedom of choice to say if they want euthanasia or not. The pragmatic
argument is for euthanasia. . In addition, that is the definition of the topic. This is what makes the
topic interesting. What makes this topic

Euthanasia Essay examples
Euthanasia is often called "mercy killing". It is intentionally making someone die, rather than
allowing that person to die naturally. It is sometimes the act of ending someone's life, who is
terminally ill, or is suffering in severe pain. Euthanasia is mostly illegal in the world today.
Euthanasia can be considered a form of suicide, if the person afflicted with the problem actively
does it. The person volunteering to commit the act to that person can also consider it a form of
murder.
The positive side of Euthanasia is that it ends a person's suffering in this world. Many physicians and
psychiatrists believe that it may a humane act. From a virtue ethics point of view, it may be
appropriate. What we seek in human existence is to be...show more content...
The benefits are numerous in that the person euthanized would cease suffering, and the families
would begin the healing process from grief and/or depression from the situation.
From Mill's perspective, the person volunteering for euthanasia has a liberty to do what he/she
wants. Mill has written that if the person does not cause harm to others, it is the person's right, or
liberty, to do what they please. If a person wants euthanasia, then that person has the sole liberties to
choose such an act, and depart society and life. Nobody is being other than the person wishing it,
and it is a volunteered act.
Brandt argues for approval of euthanasia, but killing human beings is wrong, because it injures that
person and goes against the preferences of self–preservation. However, Brandt says that the above is
not present in the issue of euthanasia, so it may be permissible. Brandt says that not all killing is
injury, so not all killing is wrong. One should pay attention to one's expressed wishes he says.
Euthanasia could be considered doing a person a favor, because you cannot injure something if you
are relieving it of pain.
The negative side of euthanasia is that it goes against natural law ethics, because we do not let
nature take its course. We are disturbing what is occurring or happening naturally to the person.
Every person has a natural inclination to continue living. It is also said

It's blatantly obvious that euthanasia should be permitted for the reasoning of your own individual
rights. If you're not familiar with the term euthanasia it is a Greek word for easy death. Also
meaning "The painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an
irreversible coma." Euthanasia is illegal in most countries, for the fact that you're taking rights away
from another human being. Each individual person on earth has their liberty, which contains the
right of owning his/her life. In a usual situation he/she has a deadly disease. They are usually lying
on a hospital bed with mixes of medical equipment connected to them. They can't do anything but lay
there and try to bare with the pain. Say you're in this situation, you beg the doctor to unplug all the
equipment and let you leave to live whatever life you have left. The doctor refuses to do so because
that will definitely death and the hospital is against doing this. If you would like to die and
another person says no, result in what say do they have? You clearly are in awful pain that you just
can't bare to deal with anymore. A person has their rights which is one of many reasons it should be
legalized. Furthermore, anyone should have the right to end his/her life by euthanasia because of all
the pain and suffering one goes through. Most people in positions like this would more than rather
alleviate their pain, suffering, and depression that comes along with their

Euthanasia is the ability to choose to die willingly. This could be through terminal sickness or
near fatal injury of which there is a high chance of dying anyway. The topic is very divisive but
currently under Australian law, euthanasia is illegal and considered murder. It is seen as dying
without dignity to people who are against euthanasia such as the view that each life is sacred and
euthanasia would bring about an increased disregard for life. People in the condition of terminal
or incurable illness may be suffering so they may choose to go through with euthanasia which is
fine because it's their lives. The topic of euthanasia in Australia is split. While some say that
euthanasia would be dying without dignity, others say that it is a way of showing mercy for
those who are suffering and want to end it. Religious teachings on the matter suggest that
euthanasia is against all beliefs and should not be practiced. We should show mercy for those
who have suffered for so long or have no cure for their ailment. Is it or is it not the right thing to
do? Petta is 78 years old and suffers from ALS, also known as Lou Gehrig's disease but better
known as motor neuron disease. He has lost the ability to move and needs to be cared for all the
time. Petta lives in the Czech Republic which is opposed to euthanasia and he says that his
condition has deteriorated past the point where he can take his own life, if he were healthier, he
would have committed suicide befor this point in his

Ethical Arguments Against Euthanasia
I will let my aunt chose to live or die! Euthanasia also medically termed as "physician–assisted
suicide", is medically defined; by the Merriam–Webster Dictionary as suicide by a patient facilitated
by means or information (as a drug prescription or indication of the lethal dosage) provided by a
physician who is aware of how the patient intends to use such means or information. Individuals all
over the world are living through this situation without being supported.With this being said the
acceptance of this will allow my aunt to not live through suffering from ovarian cancer. Although
many deem euthanasia wrong, it is medically ethical for physicians to assist terminal patient's choice
to end their lives because it exercises a patient's autonomy on living without suffering critically.
Therefore, physicians shall ethically support the allowing of euthanasia....show more content...
Based on physician assisted suicide's history, it's an effectual topic to review to understand that
euthanasia became a topic to discuss around 400 B.C.. When the Hippocratic Oath by "Father of
Medicine" Greek physician Hippocrates existed. His ethical choice was to not give an individual
deadly medicine. During this time many places believed life was to precious to throw away. In
contradiction to not supporting the ethics of a physician to aid in an individual's death, other believed
that it should be allowed. Sir Thomas More is often quoted to be the first important Christian to
recommend physician–assisted suicide. Throught the years many individuals have fought to go for or
against the moralities of choosing death when suffering critically. Till today it is still a subject of
matter that's under

One of the biggest controversies in the past decade is whether or not euthanasia should be legalized
throughout the United States. Euthanasia, also known as physician assisted suicide, is the practice
of ending the life of a patient (Euthanasia). There are different forms of euthanasia; they include
direct/indirect, voluntary/involuntary. However,euthanasia in its entirety is what has been debated.
Although some oppose the idea, others are in favor of people having the option of euthanasia.
Religious concerns may give the process a bad reputation but ultimately in a public facility church
and state should not intertwine and it should be the patient's decision. Additionally, euthanasia not
only helps a suffering patient but it may help their families be at peace as well. Many people
believe euthanasia should remain illegal because it is inhumane or is against religious beliefs for
a human being to assist someone else to end their life. Physician assisted suicide is seen to go
against popular belief that it is a doctor's job to keep a patient alive and healthy. However, a doctor's
job also includes taking the patients opinion and decision on what they want to do with themselves
to get better into consideration therefore euthanasia should be legal in the United States. Popular
contradictions of euthanasia are that many people feel it goes against religious ideals and the belief
that a doctor's responsibility is to prolong a patient's life rather than to end it. Although

Euthanasia Essay
Euthanasia is the practice of ending a life to release an individual from suffering an incurable
disease or intolerable pain. Having to lay in bed twenty–four hours a day is no way to live a life.
People that suffer from a serious illness should have the right to die by euthanasia. In
1991, a national telephone survey was conducted which posed the question, "If you were terminally
ill, what would you want for yourself?"
Fifty–two percent of one thousand four in the US said that they'd consider assisted suicide or
euthanasia. Among the reasons cited were that the people wouldn't want to burden others, live in
pain, or be dependent on machines. All Americans have the right to die because the
Constitution grants us the...show more content...
As Americans, people have the right to pursue happiness. A person's only way to be happy may be
death, so why shouldn't they be able to be happy. Having the right to be happy is an American right,
even if it means death.
There are those who argue that if euthanasia becomes legal it will become abused and overused.
This is a good point, however, if we determine the use on a case by case basis this wont be a problem.
People also argue that it is against religion. People believe, "Only God can give life and only God
should take it away." But I ask, "Why would
God prolong such pain and suffering?" Jesus Christ suffered and died on a cross, would he want to
see his people go through suffering like he had to?
So should one have the right to die? I feel a person is entitled to that choice. The word 'euthanasia'
come from the Greek––eu, meaning good, and thanatos, meaning death. So the word euthanasia
means
"good death" by it's origins. Euthanasia is a way of putting an end to a person's life in which they
are suffering or totally dependent on others or machines. Having the right to die, should become
legal so many suffering people can end their pain legally. Sometimes euthanasia serves the interest
of everyone concerned and is the best choice for the terminally ill person. It relieves the person of
unbearable pain and provides a merciful and dignified end to their life. It also relieves the terrible
emotional strain on

Euthanasia Essay
Euthanasia – Response to Anti Euthanasia Essay
Euthanasia is a topic that provokes as much controversy as capital punishment, primarily because it
is irreversible. The question of euthanasia being right or wrong is one that most would prefer left
alone. However, recent publicity on changes to existing laws has ignited considerable discussion and
has forced open the door to a much wider audience. The issues related to direct euthanasia have
raised many questions in my mind, to which I am still searching for answers. I believe it is
necessary to consider arguments, both, for and against, in order to come to any conclusion. In this
paper I will address Brian Clowes' article in the "Pro–Life Activist's Encyclopedia",
located on the...show more content...
Yet, his persistent use of medical cases where patients were classified as irreversibly comatose
and where all decisions regarding their continual treatment were made by others, neglects to
recognize the numerous cases of terminally ill patients, who simply ask for the right to control
their own destiny and to die with dignity. His use of extreme cases, all of which were found in
'National Right to Life News', gives the reader a distorted picture and neglects the many types of
cases where the prolonging of life would be cruel, inhumane and immoral. (Johnstone, 1994:353)
EUTHANASIA SETS A BAD EXAMPLE? I would ask what kind of example are we giving our
young by prolonging life at whatever cost to the person? Is quantity of life always the best option? Is
the taking of human life always wrong? In the 18th century William Mitford, an English historian
stated "Men fear death, as if unquestionably the greatess evil, and yet no man knows that it
may not be the greatest good." (Bradley, Daniels & Jones, 1969:194) Here the author
compares the act of suicide among the young with the act of euthanasia with the terminally ill. He
believes, in making euthanasia an acceptable social practice, it will inevitably have negative
repercussions on the rest of society. The writer argues that by condoning euthanasia, we condone

Essays Against Euthanasia

Recomendados

Recomendados

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais de Paper Writing Services Reviews

Mais de Paper Writing Services Reviews (20)

Último

Último (20)

Essays Against Euthanasia