The world of design is becoming increasingly aware of the dynamic nature of the context in which products are created and consumed. Designers must ensure that the products they develop will be relevant to consumers at the time of release and for the duration of the product’s shelf life. Design researchers must ensure that their theory accounts for this rapidly changing environment and its impact on the design of products. This is particularly key for modern consumer products that compete on both aesthetic and technical qualities and are undergoing constant change.
Drawing on the extensive sociological, economic and organisational theories of technology evolution, and the theories of fashion that provide a rich, multi-disciplinary perspectives on the creation and consumption of aesthetic artefacts, this study explores how product categories evolve. It finds that there are several core concepts that are common to the evolution of different product categories. These findings are illustrated through a case study of the evolution of the mobile phone. They aim to promote discussion and further exploration of a complex and under-explored area of design.
4. Sproles, G. B., & Burns, L. D. (1994). Changing Appearances. New York: Fairchild Publications.
5. Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, Arousal and Curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Coates, D. (2003). Watches Tell More Than Time. New York: McGraw-Hill.
6. How wife?
Wife good.
Lloyd Jones, P. (1991). Taste Today. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Crane, D. (1999). Diffusion Models and Fashion: A Reassessment. The ANNALS of
the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 566(1), 13-24.
7. Blumer, H. (1969). Fashion: From Class Differentiation to Collective Selection.
The Sociological Quarterly, 10(3), 275-291.
9. Moore, G. E. (1965). Cramming more components onto integrated circuits.
Electronics, 38(8).
10. Ansoff, H. I. (1984). Implanting Strategic Management. New Jersey: Prentice-
Hall International.
Andriopoulos, C., & Gotsi, M. (2006). Probing the future: Mobilising foresight in
multiple-product innovation firms. Futures, 38(1), 50-66.
11. Schumpeter
Dosi, G., & Nelson, R. (1994). An introduction to evolutionary theories in economics.
Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 4(3), 153-172.
Christensen, C. M. (1997). The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause
Great Firms to Fail. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
12. Haddon, L. (2003). Domestication and mobile telephony. In J. E. Katz (Ed.),
Machines that Become Us (pp. 43-55). New Jersey: Transaction.
Pantzar, M. (1997). Domestication of Everyday Life Technology: Dynamic Views on the Social
Histories of Artifacts. Design Issues, 13(3), 52-65.
15. Simon-Miller, F. (1985). Commentary: Signs and Cycles in the Fashion System. In M. R. Solomon
(Ed.), The Psychology of Fashion. New York: Institute of Retail Management.
21. Feedback to original problem
Deep case
study
Broad case
studies
Incomplete
understanding of Theoretical
a problem or foundation
phenomenon Improved understanding
22. 100
80
Ratios of skirt
60 width to height of
women’s gures
40
20
0
1820 1840 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940
Kroeber, A. L. (1919). On the principle of Order in Civilization as Exemplied by Changes of Fashion.
American Anthropologist, 21(3), 235-263.
23. 100
80
Ratios of skirt
60 width to height of
women’s gures
40
20 Percentage of men
wearing beards
0
1820 1840 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940
Robinson, D. E. (1975). Style changes: cyclical, inexorable, and foreseeable.
Harvard Business Review, 53(6), 121-131.