This document summarizes a previous student evaluation example. It provides feedback on various aspects of the example evaluation's structure, content, and design. Some key points made include: - The color scheme and font choice made the text difficult to read. - An overview of evaluation conventions was provided upfront. - Certain parts lacked explanation, like what a "Voice of God" technique is. - Descriptions showed knowledge of genre techniques. - Comparisons, screenshots, and applying lessons to modern contexts helped make the evaluation strong. - The conclusion emphasized the importance of comparisons, depth of answers, and professional design.

1. PREVIOUS STUDENT
EVALUATION EXAMPLE
Amir Choudhury

2. Initial impressions
• My first thought is that the colour scheme is unsuitable
• Bright text on a grey background looks un-natural
although it is clear that this is the Levi Roots colour
scheme
• However there has been an effort to make the
presentation look as pleasing to the eye as possible

3. • I don’t like the choice of
font on this slide as it a
little hard to read for
such a lot of
information
• I like the fact that he
has given an outline of
what is to be included
in the evaluation

4. I also like how this person gives an overview of
conventions in his introduction, this aids our understanding
of what the evaluation will be based on

5. • This part confused me as it did not explain what a ‘Voice of
God’ technique is
• I have made the assumption that this means the narrator
speaks with a deep voice but cannot be certain
• I do like how this person has explained about why a female
voice was used as this aids our understanding of genre
techniques

6. • The evaluation was very descriptive at times which shows
this person knows what they are doing

7. • The use of video greatly adds to the informative nature of
this presentation

8. • I like how the evaluation is applied to the modern day

9. • Comparisons are used
well in this evaluation
• This is something that I
will definitely look to
include In my evaluation

10. • There are lots of positive comments about this persons
work but he does not seem to be self critical which I think
is a necessary in order to properly evaluate your work

11. • There is a clear introduction and conclusion to each
section

12. • The use of screenshots
as a visual aid makes
the evaluation easy to
understand and will
likely be applied to my
work

13. Conclusion
• This evaluation has shown that comparison is essential as
well as being in depth with your answers
• Its use of technology is wide and should also be applied
to my evaluation
• The design was poor and so has shown that design must
be professional on my evaluation
• The design does however link to the theme of the project
which will also be a good technique for my evaluation