5. College completion rates for two-year degrees in 2009
28% overall
President Obama (July 2009) challenge
Boost community college graduates by
5 million by 2020
5
6. Lumina Foundation’s “Big Goal”
By 2025, 60% of the American population
Hold high-quality college degrees or credentials
Quality education:
Student outcomes, particularly learning outcomes
6
7. Community College Survey on Student
Engagement (CCSSE)
National benchmarks of effective educational
process in community colleges
Student engagement matters!
7
8. CCSSE benchmarks focus on institutional practices
and student behaviors that promote student
engagement, and that are positively related to student
learning and persistence.
Five benchmarks:
Active and Collaborative Learning
Student Effort
Academic Challenge
Student-faculty Interaction
Support for Learners
8
9. Achieving the Dream (AtD):
Community Colleges Count
Launched in 2004
Goal: To increase the academic success of community
college students
First-Year Experience (FYE) efforts
FYE programs focused interventions
9
10. STEM for Indiana and Ivy Tech
Global Competitiveness and Ivy Tech
11. Disproportionately large number of jobs of the
future will be in STEM fields
In 2010, 3.7 Billion invested in STEM education
While job growth between 2008-2018 is expected to
be 10%, in STEM, expectation is 17%
63% of Associate’s Degree holders in STEM earn
more than Bachelor’s Degree holders in non-STEM
(Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce, Press Release Oct. 20,2011)
12. Average wages are 14.9% below national
average
Employment growth: ranks 49th of 50 states
and DC
Average wage growth: ranks 50 of 50 states
and DC
There were 4.41 patents per 10,000 employees
vs. 6.95 for the US (Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness State of Indiana Economic
Performance Indicators)
13. Education and Health Services
Ranks 3rd in Medical devices
Ranks 1st in prefabricated enclosures
14. Ivy Tech’s focus on technology and
medical careers and degrees positions it
very well for the demand and need that
exists
15. Global Competitiveness
Higher Education needs to increase educated
workforce to remain globally competitive
• Lumina Foundation: By the year 2025, 60 percent of
Americans need hold high-quality postsecondary
degrees or credentials
• Korea, Canada and Japan all have populations of 25-34
year olds with Associate level degrees or higher
exceeding 56%. The US – 41%
16. Indiana’s adult population excluding 65 olds and older–
4,032,925
Enrollment of roughly 165,000 students/ or 4% of adult
population
A six-fold increase in enrollment would mean Ivy Tech
would educate 25% of those between 18 and 65 years of
age
Given Ivy Tech’s dominance of the community college
system, it can has great potential for growth
20. Implement student preparedness policies and practices
Expand and improve learning support services
Implement successful scheduling, curriculum and instructional
practices
Mandatory Support Services for high-risk students
Comprehensive Academic Advising System
Develop incentives for associate degree completion
Simplify transfer-oriented programs
Develop a general education core
Expand and improve dual enrollment courses
Strategies for successful transition from high school
Align curricula, academic rigor, assessment and communications
Participate in statewide data systems tracking on dual enrollment
21. Student Success Center
Subject Area Tutoring, Writing
Assistance and Information Resources
22. RECENT HEADLINES:
CHE Approves New Transfer Program for Ivy Tech
Community College – Program Provides a Set
Curriculum to Prepare Students for Transfer to All
Indiana Institutions
23. ACADEMIC COURSES
College and Life Success
Study Skills
Research Strategies
Critical Thinking
26. Key learning outcome terms include “proactive, self-
awareness, effective, critical thinking, and creative
thinking”
Designed for students with no previous college
experience
Fall 2010 Cohort
--Students enrolled in IVY 101 persisted to the spring
2011 semester at a significantly higher rate
--Students enrolled in IVY 101 successfully
completed their coursework at a significantly higher
rate
--Rates of persistence and successful course
completion were similar across age
range, gender, ethnicity, and enrollment in remedial
courses
27. Key learning outcome terms/phrases include
“apply, adjust, successfully navigate, impact, critical
thinking, and explore”
Designed for students with some previous college
experience
Fall 2010 Cohort:
--Students enrolled in IVY 120 persisted to the
spring 2011 semester at a significantly higher rate
--Students enrolled in IVY 120 did not successfully
complete their coursework at a significantly
higher rate
--Non-significant data trends suggest that gender,
age, remedial course enrollment, and ethnicity
might impact student performance
28. AtD report recommendation
Communication of Enrollment Expectations
IVY 120 Prerequisite
Integration of student success course into
programs of study
29. Highlight enrollment expectation
Consider required enrollment in IVY 101 or 120
for all students
Explore the unique needs of students enrolled
in IVY 120
Survey students currently enrolled in IVY 101
and 120
Survey has been developed and deployed
Survey results will be presented in January 2012
37. Incoming students
Information about course content,
scheduling, costs, and support
Updates on course logistics
Ongoing consultation on academic and
personal issues
38. Larger public
Prospective students
Parents and family of Ivy Tech
students
Business, government, and
community leaders
Interested members of the public
39. Larger public
Basic information about purposes and
design of success courses
Information about impact of success
courses
44. IVY Tech is well positioned to meet the
emerging educational needs of Indiana students
The use of student success courses as one piece
of a FYE program is in line with national trends
and supported by AtD data gathered by
participating colleges across the nation
An ongoing focus on best practices in the design
and instruction of student success courses, and a
well coordinated communication plan is critical
for the college
44
Notas do Editor
Welcome to the ACE Fellows Case Study Simulation for Ivy Tech Community College: Achieving the Dream…Student Success Courses.
Allow me to introduce you to the members of Team V:Andrew BuckserCamille Kluttz-LeachAdolfo SantosPatricia SendallandPeter WooldridgeEnjoy the rest of our presentation.
There are more than 11 million students attend 1200 community colleges in the USEnrollment rates have surged in recent years due to recessions, the need for unemployed adults to be retrained, and for an affordable option to higher education
Let’s take a look at some national trends and issues regarding student success in higher education with an eye toward community colleges
College completion rates in 2009 for students who enrolled in two-year degree programs were just 28% overallIn July 2009, President Obama challenged community colleges to boost their graduates by 5 million by 2020
The mission of Lumina Foundation for Education is to “expand access and success in education beyond high school, particularly among adults, first-generation college going students, low-income students and students of color. Lumina’s “Big Goal” is to have 60% of the American population hold high-quality college degrees or credentials by 2025. Quality education is defined in terms of student outcomes, particularly learning outcomes, and not by inputs or institutional characteristics.
The Community College Survey on Student Engagement (CCSSE) has introduced national benchmarks of effective educational practice in community colleges. Recent studies have shown that the more actively engaged students are with faculty, staff, other students and subject matter, the more likely they are to learn and to achieve their academic goals. STUDENT ENGAGEMENT MATTERS!
CCSSE benchmarks focus on institutional practices and student behaviors that promote student engagement, and that are positively related to student learning and persistence. The five benchmarks of effective educational practice in community colleges are:Active and Collaborative Learning—students learn more when they are actively involved in their education and engage in joint educational efforts with other studentsStudent Effort benchmark—measures time on task, preparation, and the use of student servicesAcademic Challenge—measures the extent to which students engage in the challenging mental activities, such as evaluation and synthesis, as well as the quantity of rigor of their academic workStudent-faculty Interaction—measures the extent to which students and faculty communicate about academic performance, career plans, and course content and assignments.Support for Learners—measures students’ perceptions of their colleges and assesses their use of advising and counseling services. (CCSSE 2011 Cohort Key Findings, www.ccsse.org)
Achieving the Dream (AtD): Community Colleges Count, was launched in 2004. Its goal is to increase the academic success of community college students, particularly students who have traditionally face the most significant barriers to success, including low-income students, adult learners and students of color. Much of this student success is a result of implementation of First-Year Experience (FYE) programs.First-Year Experience efforts are comprehensive approaches designed to improve success rates and increase retention of first-year students. FYE programs may include interventions focused on the streamlining admissions processes, increasing financial aid uptake, community outreach, student success courses, and targeted orientation and advisement.
Now let’s take a look at a communication plan to prepare constituents for recommended strategies for improvement
In order to ensure the effective development and implementation of the success courses, it’s essential to have easy and effective communications among the different constituencies for the plan. These include the instructional team, student support staff, incoming students, and the larger public.
The instructional team includes not only the course instructors, but also the administrative staff with connections to the program, including academic skills chairs, liberal arts department chairs, and life skills program chairs throughout the Ivy Tech system.
The members of this team need to communicate about a number of issues. They need to consult with one another regarding issues of course design and content; they need to communicate with outside experts as they study the evolving best practices for this kind of instruction; they need to be able to easily get in touch when logistical issues arise with the courses; and they need to be able to communicate in the various phases of the assessment process.
Student support staff include admissions and financial aid officers throughout the Ivy Tech system, who will be identifying prospective students and helping them manage the financial challenges of attendance; the case managers who work with students in the system; the deans of student support at the various campuses, and the senior leaders at the campus and system level.
Members of this group don’t need to know about the day-to-day instructional and logistical happenings of the courses. They do, however, need easy access to information about course scheduling, staffing, and content, and they need to be able to reach instructors easily when they have specific questions.
Students who will be entering the AtD program also need a way to communicate with instructors and administrators.
They need easy access to information about the content of courses, when they’ll be scheduled, what they’ll cost, and what kinds of support will be available. They need to be updated on developments in the logistics of the courses, and they need to be able to consult with faculty and advisors when academic and personal problems arise.
Finally, there are occasions when members of the larger public need access to information about these courses. These include prospective Ivy Tech students throughout Indiana, as well as their parents and family members; leaders of businesses, government bodies, and communities that have an interest in Ivy Tech; and members of the general public who want to find out about Ivy Tech education.
For the most part, this group needs simple, concise information about the purposes and design of the success courses. From Ivy Tech’s point of view, it would also be advantageous if they knew how effective the courses have been.
To achieve all this, we recommend a communications strategy with three basic components: email lists, websites, and meetings.
The email lists will provide easy points of contact for those groups who need ongoing two-way communication. One email list, for example, would include all members of the instructional team throughout the system; this would enable members to easily find their counterparts at other campuses for consultation, and it would provide a mechanism for sending questions, syllabi, helpful materials and organizational queries to all members at once. A second list would include both the instructional staff and members of the support staff, allowing for easy queries from one group to the other. Separate lists of students would allow for ongoing updates about course logistics and scheduling.
Two webpages, one for internal use and another for external, would also facilitate communication. The internal page could be regularly updated to include current information about scheduling, staffing, requirements, and other logistical matters for all Ivy Tech campuses. Such a page would supply most of the communications needs of the support staff and the students on a daily basis. The external page would be much shorter, containing a description of the success courses and information about their impacts, to supply the needs of the larger public.
In addition to these electronic communications resources, we recommend regular system-wide meetings to allow for extended and informal communication among members of the instructional team and the system leadership. A semi-annual conference could gather all of those in supervisory and administrative positions related to the success courses, in order to share developments and strategies and discuss the courses with senior system leadership. An annual conference would gather instructors throughout the system for an extended opportunity to discuss their differing strategies and successes in teaching these courses. Such a conference could include meetings with senior leadership and presentations by external experts.