What Are The Drone Anti-jamming Systems Technology?
Technology Trends on the Horizon: Where Learning is Headed
1.
2. ( )
Technology Trends on the
Horizon: Where eLearning
is Headed
Aaron E. Silvers,
Chief Learning Officer - Problem Solutions,
Contracted to Advanced Distributed Learning (ADL)
November 3, 2011
3.
4.
5. ( The Horizon
What powers eLearning tomorrow
builds on today’s technology,
developing a learner’s adaptive stance.
)
6.
7.
8. ( What I want for you...
)
⊛ Take notes, tweet,
share your questions.
⊛ Follow up on anything
you find relevant.
⊛ Ask your service
providers and vendors
about how they’ll help
you keep up with
these trends.
44. ( Brian Eno & David Byrne
took it to another level. )
45.
46.
47. ( Recontextualized
In each of these examples,
)
artists take a sound that has
meaning on its own and
recontextualize it to produce a
new musical experience.
This is a metaphor for the
trends in eLearning.
48.
49.
50. ( Social Business The interplay of work and learning.
)
56. ( Alfred
Chandler
Chandler developed & promoted
)
the concept of management
hierarchy in the workplace:
“Hierarchical structure increases
productivity, lowers cost.”
66. ( My Point...
)
Complex Complicated
Chaos Simple
67. (
Chaos
Complex
My Point...
Simple
To
Complicated
w p-D
ith o
fe wn
w
/n Or
o ga
co n
nd iza
iti tio
on n
s
)
68. (
Chaos
Complex
My Point...
Simple
w
To
Complicated
To ith
w p-D p- m
ith o Do a
fe wn w ny
w n co
/n Or O n
o ga rg d
co n an itio
nd iza iza ns
iti tio tio
on n n
s
)
69. Se
lf-
O
rg
ani
( zin
g
Chaos
Complex
My Point...
Simple
w
To
Complicated
To ith
w p-D p- m
ith o Do a
fe wn w ny
w n co
/n Or O n
o ga rg d
co n an itio
nd iza iza ns
iti tio tio
on n n
s
)
75. ( Elements of Content-
Powered Communities
⊛ Content as a Service (CaaS)
)
⊛ Repositories
(Content Servers)
Content
⊛ Authoritative Versions
(“Latest & Greatest”)
⊛ Better Interfaces
⊛ APIs
⊛ Metadata
⊛ Social Metadata
⊛ Learner data
76.
77.
78. ( Elements of Content-
Powered Communities
Community )
⊛ Social Learning with
Collaborative Structure
⊛ Frictionless Experiences
⊛ Search, Discovery and
Suggestion
⊛ Semantic Analysis
⊛ Powerful Analytics
79.
80.
81. ( What does this
mean to you?
What if you already have a big implemenation?
What if you’re working now on requirements?
)
82.
83.
84. Legacy Next Generation
( )
Data Model Activity Streams
JavaScript API Web Services
Intelligent Tutoring,
Sequencing & Navigation
Suggestion Engines
Registries, Repositories
Registries & Repositories powering Content as a
Service
85. Legacy SCORM
Legacy Next Generation
( )
Data Model Activity Streams
JavaScript API Web Services
Intelligent Tutoring,
Sequencing & Navigation
Suggestion Engines
Registries, Repositories
Registries & Repositories powering Content as a
Service
86. Legacy SCORM Next Generation SCORM
Legacy Next Generation
( )
Data Model Activity Streams
JavaScript API Web Services
Intelligent Tutoring,
Sequencing & Navigation
Suggestion Engines
Registries, Repositories
Registries & Repositories powering Content as a
Service
87.
88.
89.
90. ( What is Business
Asking For? )
⊛ Communities mediated through technology.
⊛ Content intelligently suggested in context of
community activity.
⊛ “Frictionless” experiences that span
multiple devices, tools and situations.
⊛ Robust analytics tying online activities to
performance metrics.
91.
92.
93. ( Rolling Your Own:
Open Source Community
Platforms )
⊛ Drupal Commons ⊛ BuddyPress
⊛ World Economic ⊛ GigaOM
Forum
⊛ Virginia Tech Carilion
⊛ Turner Broadcasting School of Medicine
⊛ Nvidia ⊛ MSU School of
Journalism
⊛ Symantec
⊛ CUNY Academic
Commons
⊛ Amplify
102. ( The Mash-Up
⊛ Talent Management Systems that marry
)
experience with content and performance
data
⊛ eCommerce systems that subtly recommend
products as customer service and sales tools
analyze customer-facing communications
⊛ Competency systems that coach young
leaders in their electronic communications
with direct reports, partners and
stakeholders.
⊛ These services can extend existing platforms
(some assembly required).
127. ( How does Augmented
Reality Fit In? )
⊛ It’s performance support.
⊛ It’s a vehicle for coaching-in-context.
⊛ It’s a canvas for immersive learning
experiences.
128.
129.
130. ( How to Play
Today...
ARIS is a platform built for Augmented Reality &
Interactive Storytelling.
)
157. ( Social Metadata:
How People Use Stuff )
⊛ Activity Streams, as just one example...
⊛ Highlight people and how they use stuff.
⊛ Highlight how “stuff” gets used.
163. ( What Will it Mean
for Your Company? )
⊛ Document Management
⊛ Knowledge Management
⊛ Project Management
⊛ Mergers & Acquisitions
⊛ Legal...
164.
165.
166. ( What Will This
Mean For You? )
⊛ Data-driven decisions about continuous
improvment.
⊛ You and I will both see how I’m developing
and performing.
178. ( Badges for New
Skills
⊛ Young learners from disenfranchised
)
communities who participate in hackfest
competitions demonstrate a mastery of
engineering robotics, but no high school
diploma.
⊛ Web developers soak up O’Reilly texts,
coursework from P2PU, but lack enrollment
in an accredited institution.
⊛ Entrepreneurs generating $950K in revenue
audit all online courses from a state school
but lack the degree credential required to be
approved as a mentor in a university
program.
179.
180.
181. ( What Does It Mean
for Your Company? )
⊛ Captures and translates what employees
know and learn across contexts.
⊛ Encourages participation tethered to results.
⊛ Formalizes and enhances social aspects of
interest-driven learning.
⊛ The processes and practices that make your
company great can be formalized and
adopted by your customers, partners and
stakeholders.
187. ( Trends on the
Horizon
⊛ Content Powered Communities
)
⊛ Next Generation SCORM
⊛ Augmented Reality: Performance-in-Place
⊛ A means for creating immersive learning
experiences
⊛ Analytics Change Everything
⊛ Project Tin Can & Learning Registry
⊛ Badges for Competencies
⊛ Mozilla Badges
Simplicity and Power are inherently at odds with one another, how to overcome?\n\nTying back the Cynefin framework a little bit, we don’t have to choose between simplicity and power. We simply need to refocus at different scales. \n\nCore Design Tenants\n\n---simplest case,  get somebody up and running 8-8, 8 pages and less than 8 hours\n---enable complexity for those who want it, but hide it from those who don't need it\n---put burden of complexity on those most able to handle it and those who need it\n---remove constraints of traditional SCORM\n---backwards compatibility where it makes sense\n---make it human readable\n
Simplicity and Power are inherently at odds with one another, how to overcome?\n\nTying back the Cynefin framework a little bit, we don’t have to choose between simplicity and power. We simply need to refocus at different scales. \n\nCore Design Tenants\n\n---simplest case,  get somebody up and running 8-8, 8 pages and less than 8 hours\n---enable complexity for those who want it, but hide it from those who don't need it\n---put burden of complexity on those most able to handle it and those who need it\n---remove constraints of traditional SCORM\n---backwards compatibility where it makes sense\n---make it human readable\n
Simplicity and Power are inherently at odds with one another, how to overcome?\n\nTying back the Cynefin framework a little bit, we don’t have to choose between simplicity and power. We simply need to refocus at different scales. \n\nCore Design Tenants\n\n---simplest case,  get somebody up and running 8-8, 8 pages and less than 8 hours\n---enable complexity for those who want it, but hide it from those who don't need it\n---put burden of complexity on those most able to handle it and those who need it\n---remove constraints of traditional SCORM\n---backwards compatibility where it makes sense\n---make it human readable\n
Simplicity and Power are inherently at odds with one another, how to overcome?\n\nTying back the Cynefin framework a little bit, we don’t have to choose between simplicity and power. We simply need to refocus at different scales. \n\nCore Design Tenants\n\n---simplest case,  get somebody up and running 8-8, 8 pages and less than 8 hours\n---enable complexity for those who want it, but hide it from those who don't need it\n---put burden of complexity on those most able to handle it and those who need it\n---remove constraints of traditional SCORM\n---backwards compatibility where it makes sense\n---make it human readable\n
Simplicity and Power are inherently at odds with one another, how to overcome?\n\nTying back the Cynefin framework a little bit, we don’t have to choose between simplicity and power. We simply need to refocus at different scales. \n\nCore Design Tenants\n\n---simplest case,  get somebody up and running 8-8, 8 pages and less than 8 hours\n---enable complexity for those who want it, but hide it from those who don't need it\n---put burden of complexity on those most able to handle it and those who need it\n---remove constraints of traditional SCORM\n---backwards compatibility where it makes sense\n---make it human readable\n
Simplicity and Power are inherently at odds with one another, how to overcome?\n\nTying back the Cynefin framework a little bit, we don’t have to choose between simplicity and power. We simply need to refocus at different scales. \n\nCore Design Tenants\n\n---simplest case,  get somebody up and running 8-8, 8 pages and less than 8 hours\n---enable complexity for those who want it, but hide it from those who don't need it\n---put burden of complexity on those most able to handle it and those who need it\n---remove constraints of traditional SCORM\n---backwards compatibility where it makes sense\n---make it human readable\n
Simplicity and Power are inherently at odds with one another, how to overcome?\n\nTying back the Cynefin framework a little bit, we don’t have to choose between simplicity and power. We simply need to refocus at different scales. \n\nCore Design Tenants\n\n---simplest case,  get somebody up and running 8-8, 8 pages and less than 8 hours\n---enable complexity for those who want it, but hide it from those who don't need it\n---put burden of complexity on those most able to handle it and those who need it\n---remove constraints of traditional SCORM\n---backwards compatibility where it makes sense\n---make it human readable\n
Simplicity and Power are inherently at odds with one another, how to overcome?\n\nTying back the Cynefin framework a little bit, we don’t have to choose between simplicity and power. We simply need to refocus at different scales. \n\nCore Design Tenants\n\n---simplest case,  get somebody up and running 8-8, 8 pages and less than 8 hours\n---enable complexity for those who want it, but hide it from those who don't need it\n---put burden of complexity on those most able to handle it and those who need it\n---remove constraints of traditional SCORM\n---backwards compatibility where it makes sense\n---make it human readable\n
Simplicity and Power are inherently at odds with one another, how to overcome?\n\nTying back the Cynefin framework a little bit, we don’t have to choose between simplicity and power. We simply need to refocus at different scales. \n\nCore Design Tenants\n\n---simplest case,  get somebody up and running 8-8, 8 pages and less than 8 hours\n---enable complexity for those who want it, but hide it from those who don't need it\n---put burden of complexity on those most able to handle it and those who need it\n---remove constraints of traditional SCORM\n---backwards compatibility where it makes sense\n---make it human readable\n
Simplicity and Power are inherently at odds with one another, how to overcome?\n\nTying back the Cynefin framework a little bit, we don’t have to choose between simplicity and power. We simply need to refocus at different scales. \n\nCore Design Tenants\n\n---simplest case,  get somebody up and running 8-8, 8 pages and less than 8 hours\n---enable complexity for those who want it, but hide it from those who don't need it\n---put burden of complexity on those most able to handle it and those who need it\n---remove constraints of traditional SCORM\n---backwards compatibility where it makes sense\n---make it human readable\n
Simplicity and Power are inherently at odds with one another, how to overcome?\n\nTying back the Cynefin framework a little bit, we don’t have to choose between simplicity and power. We simply need to refocus at different scales. \n\nCore Design Tenants\n\n---simplest case,  get somebody up and running 8-8, 8 pages and less than 8 hours\n---enable complexity for those who want it, but hide it from those who don't need it\n---put burden of complexity on those most able to handle it and those who need it\n---remove constraints of traditional SCORM\n---backwards compatibility where it makes sense\n---make it human readable\n
Simplicity and Power are inherently at odds with one another, how to overcome?\n\nTying back the Cynefin framework a little bit, we don’t have to choose between simplicity and power. We simply need to refocus at different scales. \n\nCore Design Tenants\n\n---simplest case,  get somebody up and running 8-8, 8 pages and less than 8 hours\n---enable complexity for those who want it, but hide it from those who don't need it\n---put burden of complexity on those most able to handle it and those who need it\n---remove constraints of traditional SCORM\n---backwards compatibility where it makes sense\n---make it human readable\n
Simplicity and Power are inherently at odds with one another, how to overcome?\n\nTying back the Cynefin framework a little bit, we don’t have to choose between simplicity and power. We simply need to refocus at different scales. \n\nCore Design Tenants\n\n---simplest case,  get somebody up and running 8-8, 8 pages and less than 8 hours\n---enable complexity for those who want it, but hide it from those who don't need it\n---put burden of complexity on those most able to handle it and those who need it\n---remove constraints of traditional SCORM\n---backwards compatibility where it makes sense\n---make it human readable\n
Simplicity and Power are inherently at odds with one another, how to overcome?\n\nTying back the Cynefin framework a little bit, we don’t have to choose between simplicity and power. We simply need to refocus at different scales. \n\nCore Design Tenants\n\n---simplest case,  get somebody up and running 8-8, 8 pages and less than 8 hours\n---enable complexity for those who want it, but hide it from those who don't need it\n---put burden of complexity on those most able to handle it and those who need it\n---remove constraints of traditional SCORM\n---backwards compatibility where it makes sense\n---make it human readable\n
Simplicity and Power are inherently at odds with one another, how to overcome?\n\nTying back the Cynefin framework a little bit, we don’t have to choose between simplicity and power. We simply need to refocus at different scales. \n\nCore Design Tenants\n\n---simplest case,  get somebody up and running 8-8, 8 pages and less than 8 hours\n---enable complexity for those who want it, but hide it from those who don't need it\n---put burden of complexity on those most able to handle it and those who need it\n---remove constraints of traditional SCORM\n---backwards compatibility where it makes sense\n---make it human readable\n
Simplicity and Power are inherently at odds with one another, how to overcome?\n\nTying back the Cynefin framework a little bit, we don’t have to choose between simplicity and power. We simply need to refocus at different scales. \n\nCore Design Tenants\n\n---simplest case,  get somebody up and running 8-8, 8 pages and less than 8 hours\n---enable complexity for those who want it, but hide it from those who don't need it\n---put burden of complexity on those most able to handle it and those who need it\n---remove constraints of traditional SCORM\n---backwards compatibility where it makes sense\n---make it human readable\n
Simplicity and Power are inherently at odds with one another, how to overcome?\n\nTying back the Cynefin framework a little bit, we don’t have to choose between simplicity and power. We simply need to refocus at different scales. \n\nCore Design Tenants\n\n---simplest case,  get somebody up and running 8-8, 8 pages and less than 8 hours\n---enable complexity for those who want it, but hide it from those who don't need it\n---put burden of complexity on those most able to handle it and those who need it\n---remove constraints of traditional SCORM\n---backwards compatibility where it makes sense\n---make it human readable\n
Simplicity and Power are inherently at odds with one another, how to overcome?\n\nTying back the Cynefin framework a little bit, we don’t have to choose between simplicity and power. We simply need to refocus at different scales. \n\nCore Design Tenants\n\n---simplest case,  get somebody up and running 8-8, 8 pages and less than 8 hours\n---enable complexity for those who want it, but hide it from those who don't need it\n---put burden of complexity on those most able to handle it and those who need it\n---remove constraints of traditional SCORM\n---backwards compatibility where it makes sense\n---make it human readable\n
Simplicity and Power are inherently at odds with one another, how to overcome?\n\nTying back the Cynefin framework a little bit, we don’t have to choose between simplicity and power. We simply need to refocus at different scales. \n\nCore Design Tenants\n\n---simplest case,  get somebody up and running 8-8, 8 pages and less than 8 hours\n---enable complexity for those who want it, but hide it from those who don't need it\n---put burden of complexity on those most able to handle it and those who need it\n---remove constraints of traditional SCORM\n---backwards compatibility where it makes sense\n---make it human readable\n
Simplicity and Power are inherently at odds with one another, how to overcome?\n\nTying back the Cynefin framework a little bit, we don’t have to choose between simplicity and power. We simply need to refocus at different scales. \n\nCore Design Tenants\n\n---simplest case,  get somebody up and running 8-8, 8 pages and less than 8 hours\n---enable complexity for those who want it, but hide it from those who don't need it\n---put burden of complexity on those most able to handle it and those who need it\n---remove constraints of traditional SCORM\n---backwards compatibility where it makes sense\n---make it human readable\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Imagine in the very near future a teacher sitting down at her computer or mobile device and looking for compelling educational content to help her teach the Bill of Rights to her 11th grade general education class. With a couple of key strokes, she calls up a list of choices, targeted to her specific students’ needs and leveled to her state’s standards. She sorts the list by ratings and finds half a dozen five star lessons (as determined by hundreds of high school history teachers around the country), each with dozens of reviews, and even statistics as to how effective these lessons were, as measured by online quizzes given by teachers around the country. In minutes, our teacher reviews the five choices, picks the one that she senses will work best with her kids, downloads it and includes it in her lesson plan for the following week. Importantly, her actions and anonymous profile (e.g. 11th grade teacher) will be captured automatically, so that that data adds to the growing collection of information about that specific educational element.\n\nThat is the vision of the Learning Registry and it to uses technologies much the same way as Facebook and Tin Can use activity streams.\n
Imagine in the very near future a teacher sitting down at her computer or mobile device and looking for compelling educational content to help her teach the Bill of Rights to her 11th grade general education class. With a couple of key strokes, she calls up a list of choices, targeted to her specific students’ needs and leveled to her state’s standards. She sorts the list by ratings and finds half a dozen five star lessons (as determined by hundreds of high school history teachers around the country), each with dozens of reviews, and even statistics as to how effective these lessons were, as measured by online quizzes given by teachers around the country. In minutes, our teacher reviews the five choices, picks the one that she senses will work best with her kids, downloads it and includes it in her lesson plan for the following week. Importantly, her actions and anonymous profile (e.g. 11th grade teacher) will be captured automatically, so that that data adds to the growing collection of information about that specific educational element.\n\nThat is the vision of the Learning Registry and it to uses technologies much the same way as Facebook and Tin Can use activity streams.\n
Imagine in the very near future a teacher sitting down at her computer or mobile device and looking for compelling educational content to help her teach the Bill of Rights to her 11th grade general education class. With a couple of key strokes, she calls up a list of choices, targeted to her specific students’ needs and leveled to her state’s standards. She sorts the list by ratings and finds half a dozen five star lessons (as determined by hundreds of high school history teachers around the country), each with dozens of reviews, and even statistics as to how effective these lessons were, as measured by online quizzes given by teachers around the country. In minutes, our teacher reviews the five choices, picks the one that she senses will work best with her kids, downloads it and includes it in her lesson plan for the following week. Importantly, her actions and anonymous profile (e.g. 11th grade teacher) will be captured automatically, so that that data adds to the growing collection of information about that specific educational element.\n\nThat is the vision of the Learning Registry and it to uses technologies much the same way as Facebook and Tin Can use activity streams.\n
Imagine in the very near future a teacher sitting down at her computer or mobile device and looking for compelling educational content to help her teach the Bill of Rights to her 11th grade general education class. With a couple of key strokes, she calls up a list of choices, targeted to her specific students’ needs and leveled to her state’s standards. She sorts the list by ratings and finds half a dozen five star lessons (as determined by hundreds of high school history teachers around the country), each with dozens of reviews, and even statistics as to how effective these lessons were, as measured by online quizzes given by teachers around the country. In minutes, our teacher reviews the five choices, picks the one that she senses will work best with her kids, downloads it and includes it in her lesson plan for the following week. Importantly, her actions and anonymous profile (e.g. 11th grade teacher) will be captured automatically, so that that data adds to the growing collection of information about that specific educational element.\n\nThat is the vision of the Learning Registry and it to uses technologies much the same way as Facebook and Tin Can use activity streams.\n
Imagine in the very near future a teacher sitting down at her computer or mobile device and looking for compelling educational content to help her teach the Bill of Rights to her 11th grade general education class. With a couple of key strokes, she calls up a list of choices, targeted to her specific students’ needs and leveled to her state’s standards. She sorts the list by ratings and finds half a dozen five star lessons (as determined by hundreds of high school history teachers around the country), each with dozens of reviews, and even statistics as to how effective these lessons were, as measured by online quizzes given by teachers around the country. In minutes, our teacher reviews the five choices, picks the one that she senses will work best with her kids, downloads it and includes it in her lesson plan for the following week. Importantly, her actions and anonymous profile (e.g. 11th grade teacher) will be captured automatically, so that that data adds to the growing collection of information about that specific educational element.\n\nThat is the vision of the Learning Registry and it to uses technologies much the same way as Facebook and Tin Can use activity streams.\n
Imagine in the very near future a teacher sitting down at her computer or mobile device and looking for compelling educational content to help her teach the Bill of Rights to her 11th grade general education class. With a couple of key strokes, she calls up a list of choices, targeted to her specific students’ needs and leveled to her state’s standards. She sorts the list by ratings and finds half a dozen five star lessons (as determined by hundreds of high school history teachers around the country), each with dozens of reviews, and even statistics as to how effective these lessons were, as measured by online quizzes given by teachers around the country. In minutes, our teacher reviews the five choices, picks the one that she senses will work best with her kids, downloads it and includes it in her lesson plan for the following week. Importantly, her actions and anonymous profile (e.g. 11th grade teacher) will be captured automatically, so that that data adds to the growing collection of information about that specific educational element.\n\nThat is the vision of the Learning Registry and it to uses technologies much the same way as Facebook and Tin Can use activity streams.\n
Imagine in the very near future a teacher sitting down at her computer or mobile device and looking for compelling educational content to help her teach the Bill of Rights to her 11th grade general education class. With a couple of key strokes, she calls up a list of choices, targeted to her specific students’ needs and leveled to her state’s standards. She sorts the list by ratings and finds half a dozen five star lessons (as determined by hundreds of high school history teachers around the country), each with dozens of reviews, and even statistics as to how effective these lessons were, as measured by online quizzes given by teachers around the country. In minutes, our teacher reviews the five choices, picks the one that she senses will work best with her kids, downloads it and includes it in her lesson plan for the following week. Importantly, her actions and anonymous profile (e.g. 11th grade teacher) will be captured automatically, so that that data adds to the growing collection of information about that specific educational element.\n\nThat is the vision of the Learning Registry and it to uses technologies much the same way as Facebook and Tin Can use activity streams.\n
Imagine in the very near future a teacher sitting down at her computer or mobile device and looking for compelling educational content to help her teach the Bill of Rights to her 11th grade general education class. With a couple of key strokes, she calls up a list of choices, targeted to her specific students’ needs and leveled to her state’s standards. She sorts the list by ratings and finds half a dozen five star lessons (as determined by hundreds of high school history teachers around the country), each with dozens of reviews, and even statistics as to how effective these lessons were, as measured by online quizzes given by teachers around the country. In minutes, our teacher reviews the five choices, picks the one that she senses will work best with her kids, downloads it and includes it in her lesson plan for the following week. Importantly, her actions and anonymous profile (e.g. 11th grade teacher) will be captured automatically, so that that data adds to the growing collection of information about that specific educational element.\n\nThat is the vision of the Learning Registry and it to uses technologies much the same way as Facebook and Tin Can use activity streams.\n
Imagine in the very near future a teacher sitting down at her computer or mobile device and looking for compelling educational content to help her teach the Bill of Rights to her 11th grade general education class. With a couple of key strokes, she calls up a list of choices, targeted to her specific students’ needs and leveled to her state’s standards. She sorts the list by ratings and finds half a dozen five star lessons (as determined by hundreds of high school history teachers around the country), each with dozens of reviews, and even statistics as to how effective these lessons were, as measured by online quizzes given by teachers around the country. In minutes, our teacher reviews the five choices, picks the one that she senses will work best with her kids, downloads it and includes it in her lesson plan for the following week. Importantly, her actions and anonymous profile (e.g. 11th grade teacher) will be captured automatically, so that that data adds to the growing collection of information about that specific educational element.\n\nThat is the vision of the Learning Registry and it to uses technologies much the same way as Facebook and Tin Can use activity streams.\n
Imagine in the very near future a teacher sitting down at her computer or mobile device and looking for compelling educational content to help her teach the Bill of Rights to her 11th grade general education class. With a couple of key strokes, she calls up a list of choices, targeted to her specific students’ needs and leveled to her state’s standards. She sorts the list by ratings and finds half a dozen five star lessons (as determined by hundreds of high school history teachers around the country), each with dozens of reviews, and even statistics as to how effective these lessons were, as measured by online quizzes given by teachers around the country. In minutes, our teacher reviews the five choices, picks the one that she senses will work best with her kids, downloads it and includes it in her lesson plan for the following week. Importantly, her actions and anonymous profile (e.g. 11th grade teacher) will be captured automatically, so that that data adds to the growing collection of information about that specific educational element.\n\nThat is the vision of the Learning Registry and it to uses technologies much the same way as Facebook and Tin Can use activity streams.\n
Imagine in the very near future a teacher sitting down at her computer or mobile device and looking for compelling educational content to help her teach the Bill of Rights to her 11th grade general education class. With a couple of key strokes, she calls up a list of choices, targeted to her specific students’ needs and leveled to her state’s standards. She sorts the list by ratings and finds half a dozen five star lessons (as determined by hundreds of high school history teachers around the country), each with dozens of reviews, and even statistics as to how effective these lessons were, as measured by online quizzes given by teachers around the country. In minutes, our teacher reviews the five choices, picks the one that she senses will work best with her kids, downloads it and includes it in her lesson plan for the following week. Importantly, her actions and anonymous profile (e.g. 11th grade teacher) will be captured automatically, so that that data adds to the growing collection of information about that specific educational element.\n\nThat is the vision of the Learning Registry and it to uses technologies much the same way as Facebook and Tin Can use activity streams.\n
Imagine in the very near future a teacher sitting down at her computer or mobile device and looking for compelling educational content to help her teach the Bill of Rights to her 11th grade general education class. With a couple of key strokes, she calls up a list of choices, targeted to her specific students’ needs and leveled to her state’s standards. She sorts the list by ratings and finds half a dozen five star lessons (as determined by hundreds of high school history teachers around the country), each with dozens of reviews, and even statistics as to how effective these lessons were, as measured by online quizzes given by teachers around the country. In minutes, our teacher reviews the five choices, picks the one that she senses will work best with her kids, downloads it and includes it in her lesson plan for the following week. Importantly, her actions and anonymous profile (e.g. 11th grade teacher) will be captured automatically, so that that data adds to the growing collection of information about that specific educational element.\n\nThat is the vision of the Learning Registry and it to uses technologies much the same way as Facebook and Tin Can use activity streams.\n
Imagine in the very near future a teacher sitting down at her computer or mobile device and looking for compelling educational content to help her teach the Bill of Rights to her 11th grade general education class. With a couple of key strokes, she calls up a list of choices, targeted to her specific students’ needs and leveled to her state’s standards. She sorts the list by ratings and finds half a dozen five star lessons (as determined by hundreds of high school history teachers around the country), each with dozens of reviews, and even statistics as to how effective these lessons were, as measured by online quizzes given by teachers around the country. In minutes, our teacher reviews the five choices, picks the one that she senses will work best with her kids, downloads it and includes it in her lesson plan for the following week. Importantly, her actions and anonymous profile (e.g. 11th grade teacher) will be captured automatically, so that that data adds to the growing collection of information about that specific educational element.\n\nThat is the vision of the Learning Registry and it to uses technologies much the same way as Facebook and Tin Can use activity streams.\n
Imagine in the very near future a teacher sitting down at her computer or mobile device and looking for compelling educational content to help her teach the Bill of Rights to her 11th grade general education class. With a couple of key strokes, she calls up a list of choices, targeted to her specific students’ needs and leveled to her state’s standards. She sorts the list by ratings and finds half a dozen five star lessons (as determined by hundreds of high school history teachers around the country), each with dozens of reviews, and even statistics as to how effective these lessons were, as measured by online quizzes given by teachers around the country. In minutes, our teacher reviews the five choices, picks the one that she senses will work best with her kids, downloads it and includes it in her lesson plan for the following week. Importantly, her actions and anonymous profile (e.g. 11th grade teacher) will be captured automatically, so that that data adds to the growing collection of information about that specific educational element.\n\nThat is the vision of the Learning Registry and it to uses technologies much the same way as Facebook and Tin Can use activity streams.\n
Imagine in the very near future a teacher sitting down at her computer or mobile device and looking for compelling educational content to help her teach the Bill of Rights to her 11th grade general education class. With a couple of key strokes, she calls up a list of choices, targeted to her specific students’ needs and leveled to her state’s standards. She sorts the list by ratings and finds half a dozen five star lessons (as determined by hundreds of high school history teachers around the country), each with dozens of reviews, and even statistics as to how effective these lessons were, as measured by online quizzes given by teachers around the country. In minutes, our teacher reviews the five choices, picks the one that she senses will work best with her kids, downloads it and includes it in her lesson plan for the following week. Importantly, her actions and anonymous profile (e.g. 11th grade teacher) will be captured automatically, so that that data adds to the growing collection of information about that specific educational element.\n\nThat is the vision of the Learning Registry and it to uses technologies much the same way as Facebook and Tin Can use activity streams.\n
Imagine in the very near future a teacher sitting down at her computer or mobile device and looking for compelling educational content to help her teach the Bill of Rights to her 11th grade general education class. With a couple of key strokes, she calls up a list of choices, targeted to her specific students’ needs and leveled to her state’s standards. She sorts the list by ratings and finds half a dozen five star lessons (as determined by hundreds of high school history teachers around the country), each with dozens of reviews, and even statistics as to how effective these lessons were, as measured by online quizzes given by teachers around the country. In minutes, our teacher reviews the five choices, picks the one that she senses will work best with her kids, downloads it and includes it in her lesson plan for the following week. Importantly, her actions and anonymous profile (e.g. 11th grade teacher) will be captured automatically, so that that data adds to the growing collection of information about that specific educational element.\n\nThat is the vision of the Learning Registry and it to uses technologies much the same way as Facebook and Tin Can use activity streams.\n
Imagine in the very near future a teacher sitting down at her computer or mobile device and looking for compelling educational content to help her teach the Bill of Rights to her 11th grade general education class. With a couple of key strokes, she calls up a list of choices, targeted to her specific students’ needs and leveled to her state’s standards. She sorts the list by ratings and finds half a dozen five star lessons (as determined by hundreds of high school history teachers around the country), each with dozens of reviews, and even statistics as to how effective these lessons were, as measured by online quizzes given by teachers around the country. In minutes, our teacher reviews the five choices, picks the one that she senses will work best with her kids, downloads it and includes it in her lesson plan for the following week. Importantly, her actions and anonymous profile (e.g. 11th grade teacher) will be captured automatically, so that that data adds to the growing collection of information about that specific educational element.\n\nThat is the vision of the Learning Registry and it to uses technologies much the same way as Facebook and Tin Can use activity streams.\n
Imagine in the very near future a teacher sitting down at her computer or mobile device and looking for compelling educational content to help her teach the Bill of Rights to her 11th grade general education class. With a couple of key strokes, she calls up a list of choices, targeted to her specific students’ needs and leveled to her state’s standards. She sorts the list by ratings and finds half a dozen five star lessons (as determined by hundreds of high school history teachers around the country), each with dozens of reviews, and even statistics as to how effective these lessons were, as measured by online quizzes given by teachers around the country. In minutes, our teacher reviews the five choices, picks the one that she senses will work best with her kids, downloads it and includes it in her lesson plan for the following week. Importantly, her actions and anonymous profile (e.g. 11th grade teacher) will be captured automatically, so that that data adds to the growing collection of information about that specific educational element.\n\nThat is the vision of the Learning Registry and it to uses technologies much the same way as Facebook and Tin Can use activity streams.\n
Imagine in the very near future a teacher sitting down at her computer or mobile device and looking for compelling educational content to help her teach the Bill of Rights to her 11th grade general education class. With a couple of key strokes, she calls up a list of choices, targeted to her specific students’ needs and leveled to her state’s standards. She sorts the list by ratings and finds half a dozen five star lessons (as determined by hundreds of high school history teachers around the country), each with dozens of reviews, and even statistics as to how effective these lessons were, as measured by online quizzes given by teachers around the country. In minutes, our teacher reviews the five choices, picks the one that she senses will work best with her kids, downloads it and includes it in her lesson plan for the following week. Importantly, her actions and anonymous profile (e.g. 11th grade teacher) will be captured automatically, so that that data adds to the growing collection of information about that specific educational element.\n\nThat is the vision of the Learning Registry and it to uses technologies much the same way as Facebook and Tin Can use activity streams.\n
Imagine in the very near future a teacher sitting down at her computer or mobile device and looking for compelling educational content to help her teach the Bill of Rights to her 11th grade general education class. With a couple of key strokes, she calls up a list of choices, targeted to her specific students’ needs and leveled to her state’s standards. She sorts the list by ratings and finds half a dozen five star lessons (as determined by hundreds of high school history teachers around the country), each with dozens of reviews, and even statistics as to how effective these lessons were, as measured by online quizzes given by teachers around the country. In minutes, our teacher reviews the five choices, picks the one that she senses will work best with her kids, downloads it and includes it in her lesson plan for the following week. Importantly, her actions and anonymous profile (e.g. 11th grade teacher) will be captured automatically, so that that data adds to the growing collection of information about that specific educational element.\n\nThat is the vision of the Learning Registry and it to uses technologies much the same way as Facebook and Tin Can use activity streams.\n
Imagine in the very near future a teacher sitting down at her computer or mobile device and looking for compelling educational content to help her teach the Bill of Rights to her 11th grade general education class. With a couple of key strokes, she calls up a list of choices, targeted to her specific students’ needs and leveled to her state’s standards. She sorts the list by ratings and finds half a dozen five star lessons (as determined by hundreds of high school history teachers around the country), each with dozens of reviews, and even statistics as to how effective these lessons were, as measured by online quizzes given by teachers around the country. In minutes, our teacher reviews the five choices, picks the one that she senses will work best with her kids, downloads it and includes it in her lesson plan for the following week. Importantly, her actions and anonymous profile (e.g. 11th grade teacher) will be captured automatically, so that that data adds to the growing collection of information about that specific educational element.\n\nThat is the vision of the Learning Registry and it to uses technologies much the same way as Facebook and Tin Can use activity streams.\n
Imagine in the very near future a teacher sitting down at her computer or mobile device and looking for compelling educational content to help her teach the Bill of Rights to her 11th grade general education class. With a couple of key strokes, she calls up a list of choices, targeted to her specific students’ needs and leveled to her state’s standards. She sorts the list by ratings and finds half a dozen five star lessons (as determined by hundreds of high school history teachers around the country), each with dozens of reviews, and even statistics as to how effective these lessons were, as measured by online quizzes given by teachers around the country. In minutes, our teacher reviews the five choices, picks the one that she senses will work best with her kids, downloads it and includes it in her lesson plan for the following week. Importantly, her actions and anonymous profile (e.g. 11th grade teacher) will be captured automatically, so that that data adds to the growing collection of information about that specific educational element.\n\nThat is the vision of the Learning Registry and it to uses technologies much the same way as Facebook and Tin Can use activity streams.\n
Imagine in the very near future a teacher sitting down at her computer or mobile device and looking for compelling educational content to help her teach the Bill of Rights to her 11th grade general education class. With a couple of key strokes, she calls up a list of choices, targeted to her specific students’ needs and leveled to her state’s standards. She sorts the list by ratings and finds half a dozen five star lessons (as determined by hundreds of high school history teachers around the country), each with dozens of reviews, and even statistics as to how effective these lessons were, as measured by online quizzes given by teachers around the country. In minutes, our teacher reviews the five choices, picks the one that she senses will work best with her kids, downloads it and includes it in her lesson plan for the following week. Importantly, her actions and anonymous profile (e.g. 11th grade teacher) will be captured automatically, so that that data adds to the growing collection of information about that specific educational element.\n\nThat is the vision of the Learning Registry and it to uses technologies much the same way as Facebook and Tin Can use activity streams.\n
Imagine in the very near future a teacher sitting down at her computer or mobile device and looking for compelling educational content to help her teach the Bill of Rights to her 11th grade general education class. With a couple of key strokes, she calls up a list of choices, targeted to her specific students’ needs and leveled to her state’s standards. She sorts the list by ratings and finds half a dozen five star lessons (as determined by hundreds of high school history teachers around the country), each with dozens of reviews, and even statistics as to how effective these lessons were, as measured by online quizzes given by teachers around the country. In minutes, our teacher reviews the five choices, picks the one that she senses will work best with her kids, downloads it and includes it in her lesson plan for the following week. Importantly, her actions and anonymous profile (e.g. 11th grade teacher) will be captured automatically, so that that data adds to the growing collection of information about that specific educational element.\n\nThat is the vision of the Learning Registry and it to uses technologies much the same way as Facebook and Tin Can use activity streams.\n
Imagine in the very near future a teacher sitting down at her computer or mobile device and looking for compelling educational content to help her teach the Bill of Rights to her 11th grade general education class. With a couple of key strokes, she calls up a list of choices, targeted to her specific students’ needs and leveled to her state’s standards. She sorts the list by ratings and finds half a dozen five star lessons (as determined by hundreds of high school history teachers around the country), each with dozens of reviews, and even statistics as to how effective these lessons were, as measured by online quizzes given by teachers around the country. In minutes, our teacher reviews the five choices, picks the one that she senses will work best with her kids, downloads it and includes it in her lesson plan for the following week. Importantly, her actions and anonymous profile (e.g. 11th grade teacher) will be captured automatically, so that that data adds to the growing collection of information about that specific educational element.\n\nThat is the vision of the Learning Registry and it to uses technologies much the same way as Facebook and Tin Can use activity streams.\n
Imagine in the very near future a teacher sitting down at her computer or mobile device and looking for compelling educational content to help her teach the Bill of Rights to her 11th grade general education class. With a couple of key strokes, she calls up a list of choices, targeted to her specific students’ needs and leveled to her state’s standards. She sorts the list by ratings and finds half a dozen five star lessons (as determined by hundreds of high school history teachers around the country), each with dozens of reviews, and even statistics as to how effective these lessons were, as measured by online quizzes given by teachers around the country. In minutes, our teacher reviews the five choices, picks the one that she senses will work best with her kids, downloads it and includes it in her lesson plan for the following week. Importantly, her actions and anonymous profile (e.g. 11th grade teacher) will be captured automatically, so that that data adds to the growing collection of information about that specific educational element.\n\nThat is the vision of the Learning Registry and it to uses technologies much the same way as Facebook and Tin Can use activity streams.\n
Imagine in the very near future a teacher sitting down at her computer or mobile device and looking for compelling educational content to help her teach the Bill of Rights to her 11th grade general education class. With a couple of key strokes, she calls up a list of choices, targeted to her specific students’ needs and leveled to her state’s standards. She sorts the list by ratings and finds half a dozen five star lessons (as determined by hundreds of high school history teachers around the country), each with dozens of reviews, and even statistics as to how effective these lessons were, as measured by online quizzes given by teachers around the country. In minutes, our teacher reviews the five choices, picks the one that she senses will work best with her kids, downloads it and includes it in her lesson plan for the following week. Importantly, her actions and anonymous profile (e.g. 11th grade teacher) will be captured automatically, so that that data adds to the growing collection of information about that specific educational element.\n\nThat is the vision of the Learning Registry and it to uses technologies much the same way as Facebook and Tin Can use activity streams.\n
Imagine in the very near future a teacher sitting down at her computer or mobile device and looking for compelling educational content to help her teach the Bill of Rights to her 11th grade general education class. With a couple of key strokes, she calls up a list of choices, targeted to her specific students’ needs and leveled to her state’s standards. She sorts the list by ratings and finds half a dozen five star lessons (as determined by hundreds of high school history teachers around the country), each with dozens of reviews, and even statistics as to how effective these lessons were, as measured by online quizzes given by teachers around the country. In minutes, our teacher reviews the five choices, picks the one that she senses will work best with her kids, downloads it and includes it in her lesson plan for the following week. Importantly, her actions and anonymous profile (e.g. 11th grade teacher) will be captured automatically, so that that data adds to the growing collection of information about that specific educational element.\n\nThat is the vision of the Learning Registry and it to uses technologies much the same way as Facebook and Tin Can use activity streams.\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
When you graduate high school, you get a diploma. When you pass your state’s driving test, you get a driver’s license. When you graduate college, you get a degree. There are Google Certified Teachers, Apple Distinguished Educators…\n\nHow are your skills recognized outside of a standardized curriculum? What evidence can you show of your mastery of any non-traditional competency?\n
When you graduate high school, you get a diploma. When you pass your state’s driving test, you get a driver’s license. When you graduate college, you get a degree. There are Google Certified Teachers, Apple Distinguished Educators…\n\nHow are your skills recognized outside of a standardized curriculum? What evidence can you show of your mastery of any non-traditional competency?\n
When you graduate high school, you get a diploma. When you pass your state’s driving test, you get a driver’s license. When you graduate college, you get a degree. There are Google Certified Teachers, Apple Distinguished Educators…\n\nHow are your skills recognized outside of a standardized curriculum? What evidence can you show of your mastery of any non-traditional competency?\n
When you graduate high school, you get a diploma. When you pass your state’s driving test, you get a driver’s license. When you graduate college, you get a degree. There are Google Certified Teachers, Apple Distinguished Educators…\n\nHow are your skills recognized outside of a standardized curriculum? What evidence can you show of your mastery of any non-traditional competency?\n
When you graduate high school, you get a diploma. When you pass your state’s driving test, you get a driver’s license. When you graduate college, you get a degree. There are Google Certified Teachers, Apple Distinguished Educators…\n\nHow are your skills recognized outside of a standardized curriculum? What evidence can you show of your mastery of any non-traditional competency?\n
When you graduate high school, you get a diploma. When you pass your state’s driving test, you get a driver’s license. When you graduate college, you get a degree. There are Google Certified Teachers, Apple Distinguished Educators…\n\nHow are your skills recognized outside of a standardized curriculum? What evidence can you show of your mastery of any non-traditional competency?\n
When you graduate high school, you get a diploma. When you pass your state’s driving test, you get a driver’s license. When you graduate college, you get a degree. There are Google Certified Teachers, Apple Distinguished Educators…\n\nHow are your skills recognized outside of a standardized curriculum? What evidence can you show of your mastery of any non-traditional competency?\n
When you graduate high school, you get a diploma. When you pass your state’s driving test, you get a driver’s license. When you graduate college, you get a degree. There are Google Certified Teachers, Apple Distinguished Educators…\n\nHow are your skills recognized outside of a standardized curriculum? What evidence can you show of your mastery of any non-traditional competency?\n
When you graduate high school, you get a diploma. When you pass your state’s driving test, you get a driver’s license. When you graduate college, you get a degree. There are Google Certified Teachers, Apple Distinguished Educators…\n\nHow are your skills recognized outside of a standardized curriculum? What evidence can you show of your mastery of any non-traditional competency?\n
When you graduate high school, you get a diploma. When you pass your state’s driving test, you get a driver’s license. When you graduate college, you get a degree. There are Google Certified Teachers, Apple Distinguished Educators…\n\nHow are your skills recognized outside of a standardized curriculum? What evidence can you show of your mastery of any non-traditional competency?\n
When you graduate high school, you get a diploma. When you pass your state’s driving test, you get a driver’s license. When you graduate college, you get a degree. There are Google Certified Teachers, Apple Distinguished Educators…\n\nHow are your skills recognized outside of a standardized curriculum? What evidence can you show of your mastery of any non-traditional competency?\n
When you graduate high school, you get a diploma. When you pass your state’s driving test, you get a driver’s license. When you graduate college, you get a degree. There are Google Certified Teachers, Apple Distinguished Educators…\n\nHow are your skills recognized outside of a standardized curriculum? What evidence can you show of your mastery of any non-traditional competency?\n
When you graduate high school, you get a diploma. When you pass your state’s driving test, you get a driver’s license. When you graduate college, you get a degree. There are Google Certified Teachers, Apple Distinguished Educators…\n\nHow are your skills recognized outside of a standardized curriculum? What evidence can you show of your mastery of any non-traditional competency?\n
When you graduate high school, you get a diploma. When you pass your state’s driving test, you get a driver’s license. When you graduate college, you get a degree. There are Google Certified Teachers, Apple Distinguished Educators…\n\nHow are your skills recognized outside of a standardized curriculum? What evidence can you show of your mastery of any non-traditional competency?\n
When you graduate high school, you get a diploma. When you pass your state’s driving test, you get a driver’s license. When you graduate college, you get a degree. There are Google Certified Teachers, Apple Distinguished Educators…\n\nHow are your skills recognized outside of a standardized curriculum? What evidence can you show of your mastery of any non-traditional competency?\n
When you graduate high school, you get a diploma. When you pass your state’s driving test, you get a driver’s license. When you graduate college, you get a degree. There are Google Certified Teachers, Apple Distinguished Educators…\n\nHow are your skills recognized outside of a standardized curriculum? What evidence can you show of your mastery of any non-traditional competency?\n
When you graduate high school, you get a diploma. When you pass your state’s driving test, you get a driver’s license. When you graduate college, you get a degree. There are Google Certified Teachers, Apple Distinguished Educators…\n\nHow are your skills recognized outside of a standardized curriculum? What evidence can you show of your mastery of any non-traditional competency?\n
When you graduate high school, you get a diploma. When you pass your state’s driving test, you get a driver’s license. When you graduate college, you get a degree. There are Google Certified Teachers, Apple Distinguished Educators…\n\nHow are your skills recognized outside of a standardized curriculum? What evidence can you show of your mastery of any non-traditional competency?\n
When you graduate high school, you get a diploma. When you pass your state’s driving test, you get a driver’s license. When you graduate college, you get a degree. There are Google Certified Teachers, Apple Distinguished Educators…\n\nHow are your skills recognized outside of a standardized curriculum? What evidence can you show of your mastery of any non-traditional competency?\n
When you graduate high school, you get a diploma. When you pass your state’s driving test, you get a driver’s license. When you graduate college, you get a degree. There are Google Certified Teachers, Apple Distinguished Educators…\n\nHow are your skills recognized outside of a standardized curriculum? What evidence can you show of your mastery of any non-traditional competency?\n
When you graduate high school, you get a diploma. When you pass your state’s driving test, you get a driver’s license. When you graduate college, you get a degree. There are Google Certified Teachers, Apple Distinguished Educators…\n\nHow are your skills recognized outside of a standardized curriculum? What evidence can you show of your mastery of any non-traditional competency?\n
When you graduate high school, you get a diploma. When you pass your state’s driving test, you get a driver’s license. When you graduate college, you get a degree. There are Google Certified Teachers, Apple Distinguished Educators…\n\nHow are your skills recognized outside of a standardized curriculum? What evidence can you show of your mastery of any non-traditional competency?\n
How do you know that any of this is true? You could ask around about the organizations I belong to. You could put me in a situation that would test my Spanish abilities…\n\nIf you needed SCORM skills on your team, would you know enough to assess whether I did or not? How do we know – and how do we differentiate apprentices from journeymen from masters in skills that are so relatively new and niche that we hardly recognize them out of context? This is what badges will help to do.\n\n
How do you know that any of this is true? You could ask around about the organizations I belong to. You could put me in a situation that would test my Spanish abilities…\n\nIf you needed SCORM skills on your team, would you know enough to assess whether I did or not? How do we know – and how do we differentiate apprentices from journeymen from masters in skills that are so relatively new and niche that we hardly recognize them out of context? This is what badges will help to do.\n\n
How do you know that any of this is true? You could ask around about the organizations I belong to. You could put me in a situation that would test my Spanish abilities…\n\nIf you needed SCORM skills on your team, would you know enough to assess whether I did or not? How do we know – and how do we differentiate apprentices from journeymen from masters in skills that are so relatively new and niche that we hardly recognize them out of context? This is what badges will help to do.\n\n
How do you know that any of this is true? You could ask around about the organizations I belong to. You could put me in a situation that would test my Spanish abilities…\n\nIf you needed SCORM skills on your team, would you know enough to assess whether I did or not? How do we know – and how do we differentiate apprentices from journeymen from masters in skills that are so relatively new and niche that we hardly recognize them out of context? This is what badges will help to do.\n\n
How do you know that any of this is true? You could ask around about the organizations I belong to. You could put me in a situation that would test my Spanish abilities…\n\nIf you needed SCORM skills on your team, would you know enough to assess whether I did or not? How do we know – and how do we differentiate apprentices from journeymen from masters in skills that are so relatively new and niche that we hardly recognize them out of context? This is what badges will help to do.\n\n
How do you know that any of this is true? You could ask around about the organizations I belong to. You could put me in a situation that would test my Spanish abilities…\n\nIf you needed SCORM skills on your team, would you know enough to assess whether I did or not? How do we know – and how do we differentiate apprentices from journeymen from masters in skills that are so relatively new and niche that we hardly recognize them out of context? This is what badges will help to do.\n\n
How do you know that any of this is true? You could ask around about the organizations I belong to. You could put me in a situation that would test my Spanish abilities…\n\nIf you needed SCORM skills on your team, would you know enough to assess whether I did or not? How do we know – and how do we differentiate apprentices from journeymen from masters in skills that are so relatively new and niche that we hardly recognize them out of context? This is what badges will help to do.\n\n
How do you know that any of this is true? You could ask around about the organizations I belong to. You could put me in a situation that would test my Spanish abilities…\n\nIf you needed SCORM skills on your team, would you know enough to assess whether I did or not? How do we know – and how do we differentiate apprentices from journeymen from masters in skills that are so relatively new and niche that we hardly recognize them out of context? This is what badges will help to do.\n\n
How do you know that any of this is true? You could ask around about the organizations I belong to. You could put me in a situation that would test my Spanish abilities…\n\nIf you needed SCORM skills on your team, would you know enough to assess whether I did or not? How do we know – and how do we differentiate apprentices from journeymen from masters in skills that are so relatively new and niche that we hardly recognize them out of context? This is what badges will help to do.\n\n
How do you know that any of this is true? You could ask around about the organizations I belong to. You could put me in a situation that would test my Spanish abilities…\n\nIf you needed SCORM skills on your team, would you know enough to assess whether I did or not? How do we know – and how do we differentiate apprentices from journeymen from masters in skills that are so relatively new and niche that we hardly recognize them out of context? This is what badges will help to do.\n\n
How do you know that any of this is true? You could ask around about the organizations I belong to. You could put me in a situation that would test my Spanish abilities…\n\nIf you needed SCORM skills on your team, would you know enough to assess whether I did or not? How do we know – and how do we differentiate apprentices from journeymen from masters in skills that are so relatively new and niche that we hardly recognize them out of context? This is what badges will help to do.\n\n
How do you know that any of this is true? You could ask around about the organizations I belong to. You could put me in a situation that would test my Spanish abilities…\n\nIf you needed SCORM skills on your team, would you know enough to assess whether I did or not? How do we know – and how do we differentiate apprentices from journeymen from masters in skills that are so relatively new and niche that we hardly recognize them out of context? This is what badges will help to do.\n\n
How do you know that any of this is true? You could ask around about the organizations I belong to. You could put me in a situation that would test my Spanish abilities…\n\nIf you needed SCORM skills on your team, would you know enough to assess whether I did or not? How do we know – and how do we differentiate apprentices from journeymen from masters in skills that are so relatively new and niche that we hardly recognize them out of context? This is what badges will help to do.\n\n
How do you know that any of this is true? You could ask around about the organizations I belong to. You could put me in a situation that would test my Spanish abilities…\n\nIf you needed SCORM skills on your team, would you know enough to assess whether I did or not? How do we know – and how do we differentiate apprentices from journeymen from masters in skills that are so relatively new and niche that we hardly recognize them out of context? This is what badges will help to do.\n\n
How do you know that any of this is true? You could ask around about the organizations I belong to. You could put me in a situation that would test my Spanish abilities…\n\nIf you needed SCORM skills on your team, would you know enough to assess whether I did or not? How do we know – and how do we differentiate apprentices from journeymen from masters in skills that are so relatively new and niche that we hardly recognize them out of context? This is what badges will help to do.\n\n
How do you know that any of this is true? You could ask around about the organizations I belong to. You could put me in a situation that would test my Spanish abilities…\n\nIf you needed SCORM skills on your team, would you know enough to assess whether I did or not? How do we know – and how do we differentiate apprentices from journeymen from masters in skills that are so relatively new and niche that we hardly recognize them out of context? This is what badges will help to do.\n\n
How do you know that any of this is true? You could ask around about the organizations I belong to. You could put me in a situation that would test my Spanish abilities…\n\nIf you needed SCORM skills on your team, would you know enough to assess whether I did or not? How do we know – and how do we differentiate apprentices from journeymen from masters in skills that are so relatively new and niche that we hardly recognize them out of context? This is what badges will help to do.\n\n
How do you know that any of this is true? You could ask around about the organizations I belong to. You could put me in a situation that would test my Spanish abilities…\n\nIf you needed SCORM skills on your team, would you know enough to assess whether I did or not? How do we know – and how do we differentiate apprentices from journeymen from masters in skills that are so relatively new and niche that we hardly recognize them out of context? This is what badges will help to do.\n\n
How do you know that any of this is true? You could ask around about the organizations I belong to. You could put me in a situation that would test my Spanish abilities…\n\nIf you needed SCORM skills on your team, would you know enough to assess whether I did or not? How do we know – and how do we differentiate apprentices from journeymen from masters in skills that are so relatively new and niche that we hardly recognize them out of context? This is what badges will help to do.\n\n
How do you know that any of this is true? You could ask around about the organizations I belong to. You could put me in a situation that would test my Spanish abilities…\n\nIf you needed SCORM skills on your team, would you know enough to assess whether I did or not? How do we know – and how do we differentiate apprentices from journeymen from masters in skills that are so relatively new and niche that we hardly recognize them out of context? This is what badges will help to do.\n\n
How do you know that any of this is true? You could ask around about the organizations I belong to. You could put me in a situation that would test my Spanish abilities…\n\nIf you needed SCORM skills on your team, would you know enough to assess whether I did or not? How do we know – and how do we differentiate apprentices from journeymen from masters in skills that are so relatively new and niche that we hardly recognize them out of context? This is what badges will help to do.\n\n
How do you know that any of this is true? You could ask around about the organizations I belong to. You could put me in a situation that would test my Spanish abilities…\n\nIf you needed SCORM skills on your team, would you know enough to assess whether I did or not? How do we know – and how do we differentiate apprentices from journeymen from masters in skills that are so relatively new and niche that we hardly recognize them out of context? This is what badges will help to do.\n\n
How do you know that any of this is true? You could ask around about the organizations I belong to. You could put me in a situation that would test my Spanish abilities…\n\nIf you needed SCORM skills on your team, would you know enough to assess whether I did or not? How do we know – and how do we differentiate apprentices from journeymen from masters in skills that are so relatively new and niche that we hardly recognize them out of context? This is what badges will help to do.\n\n
How do you know that any of this is true? You could ask around about the organizations I belong to. You could put me in a situation that would test my Spanish abilities…\n\nIf you needed SCORM skills on your team, would you know enough to assess whether I did or not? How do we know – and how do we differentiate apprentices from journeymen from masters in skills that are so relatively new and niche that we hardly recognize them out of context? This is what badges will help to do.\n\n
How do you know that any of this is true? You could ask around about the organizations I belong to. You could put me in a situation that would test my Spanish abilities…\n\nIf you needed SCORM skills on your team, would you know enough to assess whether I did or not? How do we know – and how do we differentiate apprentices from journeymen from masters in skills that are so relatively new and niche that we hardly recognize them out of context? This is what badges will help to do.\n\n
How do you know that any of this is true? You could ask around about the organizations I belong to. You could put me in a situation that would test my Spanish abilities…\n\nIf you needed SCORM skills on your team, would you know enough to assess whether I did or not? How do we know – and how do we differentiate apprentices from journeymen from masters in skills that are so relatively new and niche that we hardly recognize them out of context? This is what badges will help to do.\n\n
How do you know that any of this is true? You could ask around about the organizations I belong to. You could put me in a situation that would test my Spanish abilities…\n\nIf you needed SCORM skills on your team, would you know enough to assess whether I did or not? How do we know – and how do we differentiate apprentices from journeymen from masters in skills that are so relatively new and niche that we hardly recognize them out of context? This is what badges will help to do.\n\n
How do you know that any of this is true? You could ask around about the organizations I belong to. You could put me in a situation that would test my Spanish abilities…\n\nIf you needed SCORM skills on your team, would you know enough to assess whether I did or not? How do we know – and how do we differentiate apprentices from journeymen from masters in skills that are so relatively new and niche that we hardly recognize them out of context? This is what badges will help to do.\n\n
I am a second-generation Eagle Scout (yes, my dad is an Eagle Scout, too). If you are wholly unfamiliar with how Boy Scouts works, let’s just say that statistically only one out of every hundred scouts ever becomes an Eagle Scout. It’s the highest rank one can achieve in the program and the body of work required, independent of the board of review to be accepted for that rank, is significant for any youth. I share this background because it’s important to the construct of understanding how badges and rank fits together.\n\nThere are many people who are starting to pick up on the idea of badges for education, and there are many perspectives grounded in their experiences.  If you’re a fan of what Foursquare and other gamification approaches to badges, then it’s simply a rewards or achievements layer that you slap on top of an existing experience. \n\nThe Boy Scout model for badges worked as part of a larger strategic design for a whole person with a certain stance at the end of their experience. Stay with me here. Merit badges were/are focused on key skills. The badges represented an evidenced level of proficiency/mastery (argue your points in the comments) — evidenced by a subject matter expert who was your coach in that domain. These were not necessarily your Scout leaders. These were people in the community recognized to sign off on your proficiency. The badge is a recognition of that milestone.\n\nMerit badges were introduced to Boy Scouts around the rank of First Class. There are many ranks to Scouting, and each one represents a certain amount of maturity in the overall curriculum — not unlike a grade level. Do you see where I’m going here? Each successive rank is harder and harder to earn because the work and the dedication involved increases. The system was designed to shape a young man to develop a core set of values (say it with me Scouts: trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean and reverent). The merit badges provided the curricular areas of focus for skill building, but the values are reinforced throughout the attainment of the badges, and the awarding of a new rank was recognition of the maturation of the Scout in their overall development. Badges are part of it, and there are subjective evaluations, as well.\n
I am a second-generation Eagle Scout (yes, my dad is an Eagle Scout, too). If you are wholly unfamiliar with how Boy Scouts works, let’s just say that statistically only one out of every hundred scouts ever becomes an Eagle Scout. It’s the highest rank one can achieve in the program and the body of work required, independent of the board of review to be accepted for that rank, is significant for any youth. I share this background because it’s important to the construct of understanding how badges and rank fits together.\n\nThere are many people who are starting to pick up on the idea of badges for education, and there are many perspectives grounded in their experiences.  If you’re a fan of what Foursquare and other gamification approaches to badges, then it’s simply a rewards or achievements layer that you slap on top of an existing experience. \n\nThe Boy Scout model for badges worked as part of a larger strategic design for a whole person with a certain stance at the end of their experience. Stay with me here. Merit badges were/are focused on key skills. The badges represented an evidenced level of proficiency/mastery (argue your points in the comments) — evidenced by a subject matter expert who was your coach in that domain. These were not necessarily your Scout leaders. These were people in the community recognized to sign off on your proficiency. The badge is a recognition of that milestone.\n\nMerit badges were introduced to Boy Scouts around the rank of First Class. There are many ranks to Scouting, and each one represents a certain amount of maturity in the overall curriculum — not unlike a grade level. Do you see where I’m going here? Each successive rank is harder and harder to earn because the work and the dedication involved increases. The system was designed to shape a young man to develop a core set of values (say it with me Scouts: trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean and reverent). The merit badges provided the curricular areas of focus for skill building, but the values are reinforced throughout the attainment of the badges, and the awarding of a new rank was recognition of the maturation of the Scout in their overall development. Badges are part of it, and there are subjective evaluations, as well.\n
I am a second-generation Eagle Scout (yes, my dad is an Eagle Scout, too). If you are wholly unfamiliar with how Boy Scouts works, let’s just say that statistically only one out of every hundred scouts ever becomes an Eagle Scout. It’s the highest rank one can achieve in the program and the body of work required, independent of the board of review to be accepted for that rank, is significant for any youth. I share this background because it’s important to the construct of understanding how badges and rank fits together.\n\nThere are many people who are starting to pick up on the idea of badges for education, and there are many perspectives grounded in their experiences.  If you’re a fan of what Foursquare and other gamification approaches to badges, then it’s simply a rewards or achievements layer that you slap on top of an existing experience. \n\nThe Boy Scout model for badges worked as part of a larger strategic design for a whole person with a certain stance at the end of their experience. Stay with me here. Merit badges were/are focused on key skills. The badges represented an evidenced level of proficiency/mastery (argue your points in the comments) — evidenced by a subject matter expert who was your coach in that domain. These were not necessarily your Scout leaders. These were people in the community recognized to sign off on your proficiency. The badge is a recognition of that milestone.\n\nMerit badges were introduced to Boy Scouts around the rank of First Class. There are many ranks to Scouting, and each one represents a certain amount of maturity in the overall curriculum — not unlike a grade level. Do you see where I’m going here? Each successive rank is harder and harder to earn because the work and the dedication involved increases. The system was designed to shape a young man to develop a core set of values (say it with me Scouts: trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean and reverent). The merit badges provided the curricular areas of focus for skill building, but the values are reinforced throughout the attainment of the badges, and the awarding of a new rank was recognition of the maturation of the Scout in their overall development. Badges are part of it, and there are subjective evaluations, as well.\n
I am a second-generation Eagle Scout (yes, my dad is an Eagle Scout, too). If you are wholly unfamiliar with how Boy Scouts works, let’s just say that statistically only one out of every hundred scouts ever becomes an Eagle Scout. It’s the highest rank one can achieve in the program and the body of work required, independent of the board of review to be accepted for that rank, is significant for any youth. I share this background because it’s important to the construct of understanding how badges and rank fits together.\n\nThere are many people who are starting to pick up on the idea of badges for education, and there are many perspectives grounded in their experiences.  If you’re a fan of what Foursquare and other gamification approaches to badges, then it’s simply a rewards or achievements layer that you slap on top of an existing experience. \n\nThe Boy Scout model for badges worked as part of a larger strategic design for a whole person with a certain stance at the end of their experience. Stay with me here. Merit badges were/are focused on key skills. The badges represented an evidenced level of proficiency/mastery (argue your points in the comments) — evidenced by a subject matter expert who was your coach in that domain. These were not necessarily your Scout leaders. These were people in the community recognized to sign off on your proficiency. The badge is a recognition of that milestone.\n\nMerit badges were introduced to Boy Scouts around the rank of First Class. There are many ranks to Scouting, and each one represents a certain amount of maturity in the overall curriculum — not unlike a grade level. Do you see where I’m going here? Each successive rank is harder and harder to earn because the work and the dedication involved increases. The system was designed to shape a young man to develop a core set of values (say it with me Scouts: trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean and reverent). The merit badges provided the curricular areas of focus for skill building, but the values are reinforced throughout the attainment of the badges, and the awarding of a new rank was recognition of the maturation of the Scout in their overall development. Badges are part of it, and there are subjective evaluations, as well.\n
I am a second-generation Eagle Scout (yes, my dad is an Eagle Scout, too). If you are wholly unfamiliar with how Boy Scouts works, let’s just say that statistically only one out of every hundred scouts ever becomes an Eagle Scout. It’s the highest rank one can achieve in the program and the body of work required, independent of the board of review to be accepted for that rank, is significant for any youth. I share this background because it’s important to the construct of understanding how badges and rank fits together.\n\nThere are many people who are starting to pick up on the idea of badges for education, and there are many perspectives grounded in their experiences.  If you’re a fan of what Foursquare and other gamification approaches to badges, then it’s simply a rewards or achievements layer that you slap on top of an existing experience. \n\nThe Boy Scout model for badges worked as part of a larger strategic design for a whole person with a certain stance at the end of their experience. Stay with me here. Merit badges were/are focused on key skills. The badges represented an evidenced level of proficiency/mastery (argue your points in the comments) — evidenced by a subject matter expert who was your coach in that domain. These were not necessarily your Scout leaders. These were people in the community recognized to sign off on your proficiency. The badge is a recognition of that milestone.\n\nMerit badges were introduced to Boy Scouts around the rank of First Class. There are many ranks to Scouting, and each one represents a certain amount of maturity in the overall curriculum — not unlike a grade level. Do you see where I’m going here? Each successive rank is harder and harder to earn because the work and the dedication involved increases. The system was designed to shape a young man to develop a core set of values (say it with me Scouts: trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean and reverent). The merit badges provided the curricular areas of focus for skill building, but the values are reinforced throughout the attainment of the badges, and the awarding of a new rank was recognition of the maturation of the Scout in their overall development. Badges are part of it, and there are subjective evaluations, as well.\n
I am a second-generation Eagle Scout (yes, my dad is an Eagle Scout, too). If you are wholly unfamiliar with how Boy Scouts works, let’s just say that statistically only one out of every hundred scouts ever becomes an Eagle Scout. It’s the highest rank one can achieve in the program and the body of work required, independent of the board of review to be accepted for that rank, is significant for any youth. I share this background because it’s important to the construct of understanding how badges and rank fits together.\n\nThere are many people who are starting to pick up on the idea of badges for education, and there are many perspectives grounded in their experiences.  If you’re a fan of what Foursquare and other gamification approaches to badges, then it’s simply a rewards or achievements layer that you slap on top of an existing experience. \n\nThe Boy Scout model for badges worked as part of a larger strategic design for a whole person with a certain stance at the end of their experience. Stay with me here. Merit badges were/are focused on key skills. The badges represented an evidenced level of proficiency/mastery (argue your points in the comments) — evidenced by a subject matter expert who was your coach in that domain. These were not necessarily your Scout leaders. These were people in the community recognized to sign off on your proficiency. The badge is a recognition of that milestone.\n\nMerit badges were introduced to Boy Scouts around the rank of First Class. There are many ranks to Scouting, and each one represents a certain amount of maturity in the overall curriculum — not unlike a grade level. Do you see where I’m going here? Each successive rank is harder and harder to earn because the work and the dedication involved increases. The system was designed to shape a young man to develop a core set of values (say it with me Scouts: trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean and reverent). The merit badges provided the curricular areas of focus for skill building, but the values are reinforced throughout the attainment of the badges, and the awarding of a new rank was recognition of the maturation of the Scout in their overall development. Badges are part of it, and there are subjective evaluations, as well.\n
I am a second-generation Eagle Scout (yes, my dad is an Eagle Scout, too). If you are wholly unfamiliar with how Boy Scouts works, let’s just say that statistically only one out of every hundred scouts ever becomes an Eagle Scout. It’s the highest rank one can achieve in the program and the body of work required, independent of the board of review to be accepted for that rank, is significant for any youth. I share this background because it’s important to the construct of understanding how badges and rank fits together.\n\nThere are many people who are starting to pick up on the idea of badges for education, and there are many perspectives grounded in their experiences.  If you’re a fan of what Foursquare and other gamification approaches to badges, then it’s simply a rewards or achievements layer that you slap on top of an existing experience. \n\nThe Boy Scout model for badges worked as part of a larger strategic design for a whole person with a certain stance at the end of their experience. Stay with me here. Merit badges were/are focused on key skills. The badges represented an evidenced level of proficiency/mastery (argue your points in the comments) — evidenced by a subject matter expert who was your coach in that domain. These were not necessarily your Scout leaders. These were people in the community recognized to sign off on your proficiency. The badge is a recognition of that milestone.\n\nMerit badges were introduced to Boy Scouts around the rank of First Class. There are many ranks to Scouting, and each one represents a certain amount of maturity in the overall curriculum — not unlike a grade level. Do you see where I’m going here? Each successive rank is harder and harder to earn because the work and the dedication involved increases. The system was designed to shape a young man to develop a core set of values (say it with me Scouts: trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean and reverent). The merit badges provided the curricular areas of focus for skill building, but the values are reinforced throughout the attainment of the badges, and the awarding of a new rank was recognition of the maturation of the Scout in their overall development. Badges are part of it, and there are subjective evaluations, as well.\n
I am a second-generation Eagle Scout (yes, my dad is an Eagle Scout, too). If you are wholly unfamiliar with how Boy Scouts works, let’s just say that statistically only one out of every hundred scouts ever becomes an Eagle Scout. It’s the highest rank one can achieve in the program and the body of work required, independent of the board of review to be accepted for that rank, is significant for any youth. I share this background because it’s important to the construct of understanding how badges and rank fits together.\n\nThere are many people who are starting to pick up on the idea of badges for education, and there are many perspectives grounded in their experiences.  If you’re a fan of what Foursquare and other gamification approaches to badges, then it’s simply a rewards or achievements layer that you slap on top of an existing experience. \n\nThe Boy Scout model for badges worked as part of a larger strategic design for a whole person with a certain stance at the end of their experience. Stay with me here. Merit badges were/are focused on key skills. The badges represented an evidenced level of proficiency/mastery (argue your points in the comments) — evidenced by a subject matter expert who was your coach in that domain. These were not necessarily your Scout leaders. These were people in the community recognized to sign off on your proficiency. The badge is a recognition of that milestone.\n\nMerit badges were introduced to Boy Scouts around the rank of First Class. There are many ranks to Scouting, and each one represents a certain amount of maturity in the overall curriculum — not unlike a grade level. Do you see where I’m going here? Each successive rank is harder and harder to earn because the work and the dedication involved increases. The system was designed to shape a young man to develop a core set of values (say it with me Scouts: trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean and reverent). The merit badges provided the curricular areas of focus for skill building, but the values are reinforced throughout the attainment of the badges, and the awarding of a new rank was recognition of the maturation of the Scout in their overall development. Badges are part of it, and there are subjective evaluations, as well.\n
I am a second-generation Eagle Scout (yes, my dad is an Eagle Scout, too). If you are wholly unfamiliar with how Boy Scouts works, let’s just say that statistically only one out of every hundred scouts ever becomes an Eagle Scout. It’s the highest rank one can achieve in the program and the body of work required, independent of the board of review to be accepted for that rank, is significant for any youth. I share this background because it’s important to the construct of understanding how badges and rank fits together.\n\nThere are many people who are starting to pick up on the idea of badges for education, and there are many perspectives grounded in their experiences.  If you’re a fan of what Foursquare and other gamification approaches to badges, then it’s simply a rewards or achievements layer that you slap on top of an existing experience. \n\nThe Boy Scout model for badges worked as part of a larger strategic design for a whole person with a certain stance at the end of their experience. Stay with me here. Merit badges were/are focused on key skills. The badges represented an evidenced level of proficiency/mastery (argue your points in the comments) — evidenced by a subject matter expert who was your coach in that domain. These were not necessarily your Scout leaders. These were people in the community recognized to sign off on your proficiency. The badge is a recognition of that milestone.\n\nMerit badges were introduced to Boy Scouts around the rank of First Class. There are many ranks to Scouting, and each one represents a certain amount of maturity in the overall curriculum — not unlike a grade level. Do you see where I’m going here? Each successive rank is harder and harder to earn because the work and the dedication involved increases. The system was designed to shape a young man to develop a core set of values (say it with me Scouts: trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean and reverent). The merit badges provided the curricular areas of focus for skill building, but the values are reinforced throughout the attainment of the badges, and the awarding of a new rank was recognition of the maturation of the Scout in their overall development. Badges are part of it, and there are subjective evaluations, as well.\n
I am a second-generation Eagle Scout (yes, my dad is an Eagle Scout, too). If you are wholly unfamiliar with how Boy Scouts works, let’s just say that statistically only one out of every hundred scouts ever becomes an Eagle Scout. It’s the highest rank one can achieve in the program and the body of work required, independent of the board of review to be accepted for that rank, is significant for any youth. I share this background because it’s important to the construct of understanding how badges and rank fits together.\n\nThere are many people who are starting to pick up on the idea of badges for education, and there are many perspectives grounded in their experiences.  If you’re a fan of what Foursquare and other gamification approaches to badges, then it’s simply a rewards or achievements layer that you slap on top of an existing experience. \n\nThe Boy Scout model for badges worked as part of a larger strategic design for a whole person with a certain stance at the end of their experience. Stay with me here. Merit badges were/are focused on key skills. The badges represented an evidenced level of proficiency/mastery (argue your points in the comments) — evidenced by a subject matter expert who was your coach in that domain. These were not necessarily your Scout leaders. These were people in the community recognized to sign off on your proficiency. The badge is a recognition of that milestone.\n\nMerit badges were introduced to Boy Scouts around the rank of First Class. There are many ranks to Scouting, and each one represents a certain amount of maturity in the overall curriculum — not unlike a grade level. Do you see where I’m going here? Each successive rank is harder and harder to earn because the work and the dedication involved increases. The system was designed to shape a young man to develop a core set of values (say it with me Scouts: trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean and reverent). The merit badges provided the curricular areas of focus for skill building, but the values are reinforced throughout the attainment of the badges, and the awarding of a new rank was recognition of the maturation of the Scout in their overall development. Badges are part of it, and there are subjective evaluations, as well.\n
I am a second-generation Eagle Scout (yes, my dad is an Eagle Scout, too). If you are wholly unfamiliar with how Boy Scouts works, let’s just say that statistically only one out of every hundred scouts ever becomes an Eagle Scout. It’s the highest rank one can achieve in the program and the body of work required, independent of the board of review to be accepted for that rank, is significant for any youth. I share this background because it’s important to the construct of understanding how badges and rank fits together.\n\nThere are many people who are starting to pick up on the idea of badges for education, and there are many perspectives grounded in their experiences.  If you’re a fan of what Foursquare and other gamification approaches to badges, then it’s simply a rewards or achievements layer that you slap on top of an existing experience. \n\nThe Boy Scout model for badges worked as part of a larger strategic design for a whole person with a certain stance at the end of their experience. Stay with me here. Merit badges were/are focused on key skills. The badges represented an evidenced level of proficiency/mastery (argue your points in the comments) — evidenced by a subject matter expert who was your coach in that domain. These were not necessarily your Scout leaders. These were people in the community recognized to sign off on your proficiency. The badge is a recognition of that milestone.\n\nMerit badges were introduced to Boy Scouts around the rank of First Class. There are many ranks to Scouting, and each one represents a certain amount of maturity in the overall curriculum — not unlike a grade level. Do you see where I’m going here? Each successive rank is harder and harder to earn because the work and the dedication involved increases. The system was designed to shape a young man to develop a core set of values (say it with me Scouts: trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean and reverent). The merit badges provided the curricular areas of focus for skill building, but the values are reinforced throughout the attainment of the badges, and the awarding of a new rank was recognition of the maturation of the Scout in their overall development. Badges are part of it, and there are subjective evaluations, as well.\n
I am a second-generation Eagle Scout (yes, my dad is an Eagle Scout, too). If you are wholly unfamiliar with how Boy Scouts works, let’s just say that statistically only one out of every hundred scouts ever becomes an Eagle Scout. It’s the highest rank one can achieve in the program and the body of work required, independent of the board of review to be accepted for that rank, is significant for any youth. I share this background because it’s important to the construct of understanding how badges and rank fits together.\n\nThere are many people who are starting to pick up on the idea of badges for education, and there are many perspectives grounded in their experiences.  If you’re a fan of what Foursquare and other gamification approaches to badges, then it’s simply a rewards or achievements layer that you slap on top of an existing experience. \n\nThe Boy Scout model for badges worked as part of a larger strategic design for a whole person with a certain stance at the end of their experience. Stay with me here. Merit badges were/are focused on key skills. The badges represented an evidenced level of proficiency/mastery (argue your points in the comments) — evidenced by a subject matter expert who was your coach in that domain. These were not necessarily your Scout leaders. These were people in the community recognized to sign off on your proficiency. The badge is a recognition of that milestone.\n\nMerit badges were introduced to Boy Scouts around the rank of First Class. There are many ranks to Scouting, and each one represents a certain amount of maturity in the overall curriculum — not unlike a grade level. Do you see where I’m going here? Each successive rank is harder and harder to earn because the work and the dedication involved increases. The system was designed to shape a young man to develop a core set of values (say it with me Scouts: trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean and reverent). The merit badges provided the curricular areas of focus for skill building, but the values are reinforced throughout the attainment of the badges, and the awarding of a new rank was recognition of the maturation of the Scout in their overall development. Badges are part of it, and there are subjective evaluations, as well.\n
I am a second-generation Eagle Scout (yes, my dad is an Eagle Scout, too). If you are wholly unfamiliar with how Boy Scouts works, let’s just say that statistically only one out of every hundred scouts ever becomes an Eagle Scout. It’s the highest rank one can achieve in the program and the body of work required, independent of the board of review to be accepted for that rank, is significant for any youth. I share this background because it’s important to the construct of understanding how badges and rank fits together.\n\nThere are many people who are starting to pick up on the idea of badges for education, and there are many perspectives grounded in their experiences.  If you’re a fan of what Foursquare and other gamification approaches to badges, then it’s simply a rewards or achievements layer that you slap on top of an existing experience. \n\nThe Boy Scout model for badges worked as part of a larger strategic design for a whole person with a certain stance at the end of their experience. Stay with me here. Merit badges were/are focused on key skills. The badges represented an evidenced level of proficiency/mastery (argue your points in the comments) — evidenced by a subject matter expert who was your coach in that domain. These were not necessarily your Scout leaders. These were people in the community recognized to sign off on your proficiency. The badge is a recognition of that milestone.\n\nMerit badges were introduced to Boy Scouts around the rank of First Class. There are many ranks to Scouting, and each one represents a certain amount of maturity in the overall curriculum — not unlike a grade level. Do you see where I’m going here? Each successive rank is harder and harder to earn because the work and the dedication involved increases. The system was designed to shape a young man to develop a core set of values (say it with me Scouts: trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean and reverent). The merit badges provided the curricular areas of focus for skill building, but the values are reinforced throughout the attainment of the badges, and the awarding of a new rank was recognition of the maturation of the Scout in their overall development. Badges are part of it, and there are subjective evaluations, as well.\n
I am a second-generation Eagle Scout (yes, my dad is an Eagle Scout, too). If you are wholly unfamiliar with how Boy Scouts works, let’s just say that statistically only one out of every hundred scouts ever becomes an Eagle Scout. It’s the highest rank one can achieve in the program and the body of work required, independent of the board of review to be accepted for that rank, is significant for any youth. I share this background because it’s important to the construct of understanding how badges and rank fits together.\n\nThere are many people who are starting to pick up on the idea of badges for education, and there are many perspectives grounded in their experiences.  If you’re a fan of what Foursquare and other gamification approaches to badges, then it’s simply a rewards or achievements layer that you slap on top of an existing experience. \n\nThe Boy Scout model for badges worked as part of a larger strategic design for a whole person with a certain stance at the end of their experience. Stay with me here. Merit badges were/are focused on key skills. The badges represented an evidenced level of proficiency/mastery (argue your points in the comments) — evidenced by a subject matter expert who was your coach in that domain. These were not necessarily your Scout leaders. These were people in the community recognized to sign off on your proficiency. The badge is a recognition of that milestone.\n\nMerit badges were introduced to Boy Scouts around the rank of First Class. There are many ranks to Scouting, and each one represents a certain amount of maturity in the overall curriculum — not unlike a grade level. Do you see where I’m going here? Each successive rank is harder and harder to earn because the work and the dedication involved increases. The system was designed to shape a young man to develop a core set of values (say it with me Scouts: trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean and reverent). The merit badges provided the curricular areas of focus for skill building, but the values are reinforced throughout the attainment of the badges, and the awarding of a new rank was recognition of the maturation of the Scout in their overall development. Badges are part of it, and there are subjective evaluations, as well.\n
I am a second-generation Eagle Scout (yes, my dad is an Eagle Scout, too). If you are wholly unfamiliar with how Boy Scouts works, let’s just say that statistically only one out of every hundred scouts ever becomes an Eagle Scout. It’s the highest rank one can achieve in the program and the body of work required, independent of the board of review to be accepted for that rank, is significant for any youth. I share this background because it’s important to the construct of understanding how badges and rank fits together.\n\nThere are many people who are starting to pick up on the idea of badges for education, and there are many perspectives grounded in their experiences.  If you’re a fan of what Foursquare and other gamification approaches to badges, then it’s simply a rewards or achievements layer that you slap on top of an existing experience. \n\nThe Boy Scout model for badges worked as part of a larger strategic design for a whole person with a certain stance at the end of their experience. Stay with me here. Merit badges were/are focused on key skills. The badges represented an evidenced level of proficiency/mastery (argue your points in the comments) — evidenced by a subject matter expert who was your coach in that domain. These were not necessarily your Scout leaders. These were people in the community recognized to sign off on your proficiency. The badge is a recognition of that milestone.\n\nMerit badges were introduced to Boy Scouts around the rank of First Class. There are many ranks to Scouting, and each one represents a certain amount of maturity in the overall curriculum — not unlike a grade level. Do you see where I’m going here? Each successive rank is harder and harder to earn because the work and the dedication involved increases. The system was designed to shape a young man to develop a core set of values (say it with me Scouts: trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean and reverent). The merit badges provided the curricular areas of focus for skill building, but the values are reinforced throughout the attainment of the badges, and the awarding of a new rank was recognition of the maturation of the Scout in their overall development. Badges are part of it, and there are subjective evaluations, as well.\n
I am a second-generation Eagle Scout (yes, my dad is an Eagle Scout, too). If you are wholly unfamiliar with how Boy Scouts works, let’s just say that statistically only one out of every hundred scouts ever becomes an Eagle Scout. It’s the highest rank one can achieve in the program and the body of work required, independent of the board of review to be accepted for that rank, is significant for any youth. I share this background because it’s important to the construct of understanding how badges and rank fits together.\n\nThere are many people who are starting to pick up on the idea of badges for education, and there are many perspectives grounded in their experiences.  If you’re a fan of what Foursquare and other gamification approaches to badges, then it’s simply a rewards or achievements layer that you slap on top of an existing experience. \n\nThe Boy Scout model for badges worked as part of a larger strategic design for a whole person with a certain stance at the end of their experience. Stay with me here. Merit badges were/are focused on key skills. The badges represented an evidenced level of proficiency/mastery (argue your points in the comments) — evidenced by a subject matter expert who was your coach in that domain. These were not necessarily your Scout leaders. These were people in the community recognized to sign off on your proficiency. The badge is a recognition of that milestone.\n\nMerit badges were introduced to Boy Scouts around the rank of First Class. There are many ranks to Scouting, and each one represents a certain amount of maturity in the overall curriculum — not unlike a grade level. Do you see where I’m going here? Each successive rank is harder and harder to earn because the work and the dedication involved increases. The system was designed to shape a young man to develop a core set of values (say it with me Scouts: trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean and reverent). The merit badges provided the curricular areas of focus for skill building, but the values are reinforced throughout the attainment of the badges, and the awarding of a new rank was recognition of the maturation of the Scout in their overall development. Badges are part of it, and there are subjective evaluations, as well.\n
I am a second-generation Eagle Scout (yes, my dad is an Eagle Scout, too). If you are wholly unfamiliar with how Boy Scouts works, let’s just say that statistically only one out of every hundred scouts ever becomes an Eagle Scout. It’s the highest rank one can achieve in the program and the body of work required, independent of the board of review to be accepted for that rank, is significant for any youth. I share this background because it’s important to the construct of understanding how badges and rank fits together.\n\nThere are many people who are starting to pick up on the idea of badges for education, and there are many perspectives grounded in their experiences.  If you’re a fan of what Foursquare and other gamification approaches to badges, then it’s simply a rewards or achievements layer that you slap on top of an existing experience. \n\nThe Boy Scout model for badges worked as part of a larger strategic design for a whole person with a certain stance at the end of their experience. Stay with me here. Merit badges were/are focused on key skills. The badges represented an evidenced level of proficiency/mastery (argue your points in the comments) — evidenced by a subject matter expert who was your coach in that domain. These were not necessarily your Scout leaders. These were people in the community recognized to sign off on your proficiency. The badge is a recognition of that milestone.\n\nMerit badges were introduced to Boy Scouts around the rank of First Class. There are many ranks to Scouting, and each one represents a certain amount of maturity in the overall curriculum — not unlike a grade level. Do you see where I’m going here? Each successive rank is harder and harder to earn because the work and the dedication involved increases. The system was designed to shape a young man to develop a core set of values (say it with me Scouts: trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean and reverent). The merit badges provided the curricular areas of focus for skill building, but the values are reinforced throughout the attainment of the badges, and the awarding of a new rank was recognition of the maturation of the Scout in their overall development. Badges are part of it, and there are subjective evaluations, as well.\n
I am a second-generation Eagle Scout (yes, my dad is an Eagle Scout, too). If you are wholly unfamiliar with how Boy Scouts works, let’s just say that statistically only one out of every hundred scouts ever becomes an Eagle Scout. It’s the highest rank one can achieve in the program and the body of work required, independent of the board of review to be accepted for that rank, is significant for any youth. I share this background because it’s important to the construct of understanding how badges and rank fits together.\n\nThere are many people who are starting to pick up on the idea of badges for education, and there are many perspectives grounded in their experiences.  If you’re a fan of what Foursquare and other gamification approaches to badges, then it’s simply a rewards or achievements layer that you slap on top of an existing experience. \n\nThe Boy Scout model for badges worked as part of a larger strategic design for a whole person with a certain stance at the end of their experience. Stay with me here. Merit badges were/are focused on key skills. The badges represented an evidenced level of proficiency/mastery (argue your points in the comments) — evidenced by a subject matter expert who was your coach in that domain. These were not necessarily your Scout leaders. These were people in the community recognized to sign off on your proficiency. The badge is a recognition of that milestone.\n\nMerit badges were introduced to Boy Scouts around the rank of First Class. There are many ranks to Scouting, and each one represents a certain amount of maturity in the overall curriculum — not unlike a grade level. Do you see where I’m going here? Each successive rank is harder and harder to earn because the work and the dedication involved increases. The system was designed to shape a young man to develop a core set of values (say it with me Scouts: trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean and reverent). The merit badges provided the curricular areas of focus for skill building, but the values are reinforced throughout the attainment of the badges, and the awarding of a new rank was recognition of the maturation of the Scout in their overall development. Badges are part of it, and there are subjective evaluations, as well.\n
I am a second-generation Eagle Scout (yes, my dad is an Eagle Scout, too). If you are wholly unfamiliar with how Boy Scouts works, let’s just say that statistically only one out of every hundred scouts ever becomes an Eagle Scout. It’s the highest rank one can achieve in the program and the body of work required, independent of the board of review to be accepted for that rank, is significant for any youth. I share this background because it’s important to the construct of understanding how badges and rank fits together.\n\nThere are many people who are starting to pick up on the idea of badges for education, and there are many perspectives grounded in their experiences.  If you’re a fan of what Foursquare and other gamification approaches to badges, then it’s simply a rewards or achievements layer that you slap on top of an existing experience. \n\nThe Boy Scout model for badges worked as part of a larger strategic design for a whole person with a certain stance at the end of their experience. Stay with me here. Merit badges were/are focused on key skills. The badges represented an evidenced level of proficiency/mastery (argue your points in the comments) — evidenced by a subject matter expert who was your coach in that domain. These were not necessarily your Scout leaders. These were people in the community recognized to sign off on your proficiency. The badge is a recognition of that milestone.\n\nMerit badges were introduced to Boy Scouts around the rank of First Class. There are many ranks to Scouting, and each one represents a certain amount of maturity in the overall curriculum — not unlike a grade level. Do you see where I’m going here? Each successive rank is harder and harder to earn because the work and the dedication involved increases. The system was designed to shape a young man to develop a core set of values (say it with me Scouts: trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean and reverent). The merit badges provided the curricular areas of focus for skill building, but the values are reinforced throughout the attainment of the badges, and the awarding of a new rank was recognition of the maturation of the Scout in their overall development. Badges are part of it, and there are subjective evaluations, as well.\n
I am a second-generation Eagle Scout (yes, my dad is an Eagle Scout, too). If you are wholly unfamiliar with how Boy Scouts works, let’s just say that statistically only one out of every hundred scouts ever becomes an Eagle Scout. It’s the highest rank one can achieve in the program and the body of work required, independent of the board of review to be accepted for that rank, is significant for any youth. I share this background because it’s important to the construct of understanding how badges and rank fits together.\n\nThere are many people who are starting to pick up on the idea of badges for education, and there are many perspectives grounded in their experiences.  If you’re a fan of what Foursquare and other gamification approaches to badges, then it’s simply a rewards or achievements layer that you slap on top of an existing experience. \n\nThe Boy Scout model for badges worked as part of a larger strategic design for a whole person with a certain stance at the end of their experience. Stay with me here. Merit badges were/are focused on key skills. The badges represented an evidenced level of proficiency/mastery (argue your points in the comments) — evidenced by a subject matter expert who was your coach in that domain. These were not necessarily your Scout leaders. These were people in the community recognized to sign off on your proficiency. The badge is a recognition of that milestone.\n\nMerit badges were introduced to Boy Scouts around the rank of First Class. There are many ranks to Scouting, and each one represents a certain amount of maturity in the overall curriculum — not unlike a grade level. Do you see where I’m going here? Each successive rank is harder and harder to earn because the work and the dedication involved increases. The system was designed to shape a young man to develop a core set of values (say it with me Scouts: trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean and reverent). The merit badges provided the curricular areas of focus for skill building, but the values are reinforced throughout the attainment of the badges, and the awarding of a new rank was recognition of the maturation of the Scout in their overall development. Badges are part of it, and there are subjective evaluations, as well.\n
I am a second-generation Eagle Scout (yes, my dad is an Eagle Scout, too). If you are wholly unfamiliar with how Boy Scouts works, let’s just say that statistically only one out of every hundred scouts ever becomes an Eagle Scout. It’s the highest rank one can achieve in the program and the body of work required, independent of the board of review to be accepted for that rank, is significant for any youth. I share this background because it’s important to the construct of understanding how badges and rank fits together.\n\nThere are many people who are starting to pick up on the idea of badges for education, and there are many perspectives grounded in their experiences.  If you’re a fan of what Foursquare and other gamification approaches to badges, then it’s simply a rewards or achievements layer that you slap on top of an existing experience. \n\nThe Boy Scout model for badges worked as part of a larger strategic design for a whole person with a certain stance at the end of their experience. Stay with me here. Merit badges were/are focused on key skills. The badges represented an evidenced level of proficiency/mastery (argue your points in the comments) — evidenced by a subject matter expert who was your coach in that domain. These were not necessarily your Scout leaders. These were people in the community recognized to sign off on your proficiency. The badge is a recognition of that milestone.\n\nMerit badges were introduced to Boy Scouts around the rank of First Class. There are many ranks to Scouting, and each one represents a certain amount of maturity in the overall curriculum — not unlike a grade level. Do you see where I’m going here? Each successive rank is harder and harder to earn because the work and the dedication involved increases. The system was designed to shape a young man to develop a core set of values (say it with me Scouts: trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean and reverent). The merit badges provided the curricular areas of focus for skill building, but the values are reinforced throughout the attainment of the badges, and the awarding of a new rank was recognition of the maturation of the Scout in their overall development. Badges are part of it, and there are subjective evaluations, as well.\n
I am a second-generation Eagle Scout (yes, my dad is an Eagle Scout, too). If you are wholly unfamiliar with how Boy Scouts works, let’s just say that statistically only one out of every hundred scouts ever becomes an Eagle Scout. It’s the highest rank one can achieve in the program and the body of work required, independent of the board of review to be accepted for that rank, is significant for any youth. I share this background because it’s important to the construct of understanding how badges and rank fits together.\n\nThere are many people who are starting to pick up on the idea of badges for education, and there are many perspectives grounded in their experiences.  If you’re a fan of what Foursquare and other gamification approaches to badges, then it’s simply a rewards or achievements layer that you slap on top of an existing experience. \n\nThe Boy Scout model for badges worked as part of a larger strategic design for a whole person with a certain stance at the end of their experience. Stay with me here. Merit badges were/are focused on key skills. The badges represented an evidenced level of proficiency/mastery (argue your points in the comments) — evidenced by a subject matter expert who was your coach in that domain. These were not necessarily your Scout leaders. These were people in the community recognized to sign off on your proficiency. The badge is a recognition of that milestone.\n\nMerit badges were introduced to Boy Scouts around the rank of First Class. There are many ranks to Scouting, and each one represents a certain amount of maturity in the overall curriculum — not unlike a grade level. Do you see where I’m going here? Each successive rank is harder and harder to earn because the work and the dedication involved increases. The system was designed to shape a young man to develop a core set of values (say it with me Scouts: trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean and reverent). The merit badges provided the curricular areas of focus for skill building, but the values are reinforced throughout the attainment of the badges, and the awarding of a new rank was recognition of the maturation of the Scout in their overall development. Badges are part of it, and there are subjective evaluations, as well.\n
I am a second-generation Eagle Scout (yes, my dad is an Eagle Scout, too). If you are wholly unfamiliar with how Boy Scouts works, let’s just say that statistically only one out of every hundred scouts ever becomes an Eagle Scout. It’s the highest rank one can achieve in the program and the body of work required, independent of the board of review to be accepted for that rank, is significant for any youth. I share this background because it’s important to the construct of understanding how badges and rank fits together.\n\nThere are many people who are starting to pick up on the idea of badges for education, and there are many perspectives grounded in their experiences.  If you’re a fan of what Foursquare and other gamification approaches to badges, then it’s simply a rewards or achievements layer that you slap on top of an existing experience. \n\nThe Boy Scout model for badges worked as part of a larger strategic design for a whole person with a certain stance at the end of their experience. Stay with me here. Merit badges were/are focused on key skills. The badges represented an evidenced level of proficiency/mastery (argue your points in the comments) — evidenced by a subject matter expert who was your coach in that domain. These were not necessarily your Scout leaders. These were people in the community recognized to sign off on your proficiency. The badge is a recognition of that milestone.\n\nMerit badges were introduced to Boy Scouts around the rank of First Class. There are many ranks to Scouting, and each one represents a certain amount of maturity in the overall curriculum — not unlike a grade level. Do you see where I’m going here? Each successive rank is harder and harder to earn because the work and the dedication involved increases. The system was designed to shape a young man to develop a core set of values (say it with me Scouts: trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean and reverent). The merit badges provided the curricular areas of focus for skill building, but the values are reinforced throughout the attainment of the badges, and the awarding of a new rank was recognition of the maturation of the Scout in their overall development. Badges are part of it, and there are subjective evaluations, as well.\n
I am a second-generation Eagle Scout (yes, my dad is an Eagle Scout, too). If you are wholly unfamiliar with how Boy Scouts works, let’s just say that statistically only one out of every hundred scouts ever becomes an Eagle Scout. It’s the highest rank one can achieve in the program and the body of work required, independent of the board of review to be accepted for that rank, is significant for any youth. I share this background because it’s important to the construct of understanding how badges and rank fits together.\n\nThere are many people who are starting to pick up on the idea of badges for education, and there are many perspectives grounded in their experiences.  If you’re a fan of what Foursquare and other gamification approaches to badges, then it’s simply a rewards or achievements layer that you slap on top of an existing experience. \n\nThe Boy Scout model for badges worked as part of a larger strategic design for a whole person with a certain stance at the end of their experience. Stay with me here. Merit badges were/are focused on key skills. The badges represented an evidenced level of proficiency/mastery (argue your points in the comments) — evidenced by a subject matter expert who was your coach in that domain. These were not necessarily your Scout leaders. These were people in the community recognized to sign off on your proficiency. The badge is a recognition of that milestone.\n\nMerit badges were introduced to Boy Scouts around the rank of First Class. There are many ranks to Scouting, and each one represents a certain amount of maturity in the overall curriculum — not unlike a grade level. Do you see where I’m going here? Each successive rank is harder and harder to earn because the work and the dedication involved increases. The system was designed to shape a young man to develop a core set of values (say it with me Scouts: trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean and reverent). The merit badges provided the curricular areas of focus for skill building, but the values are reinforced throughout the attainment of the badges, and the awarding of a new rank was recognition of the maturation of the Scout in their overall development. Badges are part of it, and there are subjective evaluations, as well.\n
I am a second-generation Eagle Scout (yes, my dad is an Eagle Scout, too). If you are wholly unfamiliar with how Boy Scouts works, let’s just say that statistically only one out of every hundred scouts ever becomes an Eagle Scout. It’s the highest rank one can achieve in the program and the body of work required, independent of the board of review to be accepted for that rank, is significant for any youth. I share this background because it’s important to the construct of understanding how badges and rank fits together.\n\nThere are many people who are starting to pick up on the idea of badges for education, and there are many perspectives grounded in their experiences.  If you’re a fan of what Foursquare and other gamification approaches to badges, then it’s simply a rewards or achievements layer that you slap on top of an existing experience. \n\nThe Boy Scout model for badges worked as part of a larger strategic design for a whole person with a certain stance at the end of their experience. Stay with me here. Merit badges were/are focused on key skills. The badges represented an evidenced level of proficiency/mastery (argue your points in the comments) — evidenced by a subject matter expert who was your coach in that domain. These were not necessarily your Scout leaders. These were people in the community recognized to sign off on your proficiency. The badge is a recognition of that milestone.\n\nMerit badges were introduced to Boy Scouts around the rank of First Class. There are many ranks to Scouting, and each one represents a certain amount of maturity in the overall curriculum — not unlike a grade level. Do you see where I’m going here? Each successive rank is harder and harder to earn because the work and the dedication involved increases. The system was designed to shape a young man to develop a core set of values (say it with me Scouts: trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean and reverent). The merit badges provided the curricular areas of focus for skill building, but the values are reinforced throughout the attainment of the badges, and the awarding of a new rank was recognition of the maturation of the Scout in their overall development. Badges are part of it, and there are subjective evaluations, as well.\n
I am a second-generation Eagle Scout (yes, my dad is an Eagle Scout, too). If you are wholly unfamiliar with how Boy Scouts works, let’s just say that statistically only one out of every hundred scouts ever becomes an Eagle Scout. It’s the highest rank one can achieve in the program and the body of work required, independent of the board of review to be accepted for that rank, is significant for any youth. I share this background because it’s important to the construct of understanding how badges and rank fits together.\n\nThere are many people who are starting to pick up on the idea of badges for education, and there are many perspectives grounded in their experiences.  If you’re a fan of what Foursquare and other gamification approaches to badges, then it’s simply a rewards or achievements layer that you slap on top of an existing experience. \n\nThe Boy Scout model for badges worked as part of a larger strategic design for a whole person with a certain stance at the end of their experience. Stay with me here. Merit badges were/are focused on key skills. The badges represented an evidenced level of proficiency/mastery (argue your points in the comments) — evidenced by a subject matter expert who was your coach in that domain. These were not necessarily your Scout leaders. These were people in the community recognized to sign off on your proficiency. The badge is a recognition of that milestone.\n\nMerit badges were introduced to Boy Scouts around the rank of First Class. There are many ranks to Scouting, and each one represents a certain amount of maturity in the overall curriculum — not unlike a grade level. Do you see where I’m going here? Each successive rank is harder and harder to earn because the work and the dedication involved increases. The system was designed to shape a young man to develop a core set of values (say it with me Scouts: trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean and reverent). The merit badges provided the curricular areas of focus for skill building, but the values are reinforced throughout the attainment of the badges, and the awarding of a new rank was recognition of the maturation of the Scout in their overall development. Badges are part of it, and there are subjective evaluations, as well.\n
I am a second-generation Eagle Scout (yes, my dad is an Eagle Scout, too). If you are wholly unfamiliar with how Boy Scouts works, let’s just say that statistically only one out of every hundred scouts ever becomes an Eagle Scout. It’s the highest rank one can achieve in the program and the body of work required, independent of the board of review to be accepted for that rank, is significant for any youth. I share this background because it’s important to the construct of understanding how badges and rank fits together.\n\nThere are many people who are starting to pick up on the idea of badges for education, and there are many perspectives grounded in their experiences.  If you’re a fan of what Foursquare and other gamification approaches to badges, then it’s simply a rewards or achievements layer that you slap on top of an existing experience. \n\nThe Boy Scout model for badges worked as part of a larger strategic design for a whole person with a certain stance at the end of their experience. Stay with me here. Merit badges were/are focused on key skills. The badges represented an evidenced level of proficiency/mastery (argue your points in the comments) — evidenced by a subject matter expert who was your coach in that domain. These were not necessarily your Scout leaders. These were people in the community recognized to sign off on your proficiency. The badge is a recognition of that milestone.\n\nMerit badges were introduced to Boy Scouts around the rank of First Class. There are many ranks to Scouting, and each one represents a certain amount of maturity in the overall curriculum — not unlike a grade level. Do you see where I’m going here? Each successive rank is harder and harder to earn because the work and the dedication involved increases. The system was designed to shape a young man to develop a core set of values (say it with me Scouts: trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean and reverent). The merit badges provided the curricular areas of focus for skill building, but the values are reinforced throughout the attainment of the badges, and the awarding of a new rank was recognition of the maturation of the Scout in their overall development. Badges are part of it, and there are subjective evaluations, as well.\n
I am a second-generation Eagle Scout (yes, my dad is an Eagle Scout, too). If you are wholly unfamiliar with how Boy Scouts works, let’s just say that statistically only one out of every hundred scouts ever becomes an Eagle Scout. It’s the highest rank one can achieve in the program and the body of work required, independent of the board of review to be accepted for that rank, is significant for any youth. I share this background because it’s important to the construct of understanding how badges and rank fits together.\n\nThere are many people who are starting to pick up on the idea of badges for education, and there are many perspectives grounded in their experiences.  If you’re a fan of what Foursquare and other gamification approaches to badges, then it’s simply a rewards or achievements layer that you slap on top of an existing experience. \n\nThe Boy Scout model for badges worked as part of a larger strategic design for a whole person with a certain stance at the end of their experience. Stay with me here. Merit badges were/are focused on key skills. The badges represented an evidenced level of proficiency/mastery (argue your points in the comments) — evidenced by a subject matter expert who was your coach in that domain. These were not necessarily your Scout leaders. These were people in the community recognized to sign off on your proficiency. The badge is a recognition of that milestone.\n\nMerit badges were introduced to Boy Scouts around the rank of First Class. There are many ranks to Scouting, and each one represents a certain amount of maturity in the overall curriculum — not unlike a grade level. Do you see where I’m going here? Each successive rank is harder and harder to earn because the work and the dedication involved increases. The system was designed to shape a young man to develop a core set of values (say it with me Scouts: trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean and reverent). The merit badges provided the curricular areas of focus for skill building, but the values are reinforced throughout the attainment of the badges, and the awarding of a new rank was recognition of the maturation of the Scout in their overall development. Badges are part of it, and there are subjective evaluations, as well.\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
It recognizes that the adaptive stance we’re looking to instill in people is something that organizations value because people who can adapt can find ways for organizations large and small to win.\n\n
It recognizes that the adaptive stance we’re looking to instill in people is something that organizations value because people who can adapt can find ways for organizations large and small to win.\n\n
It recognizes that the adaptive stance we’re looking to instill in people is something that organizations value because people who can adapt can find ways for organizations large and small to win.\n\n
It recognizes that the adaptive stance we’re looking to instill in people is something that organizations value because people who can adapt can find ways for organizations large and small to win.\n\n
It recognizes that the adaptive stance we’re looking to instill in people is something that organizations value because people who can adapt can find ways for organizations large and small to win.\n\n
It recognizes that the adaptive stance we’re looking to instill in people is something that organizations value because people who can adapt can find ways for organizations large and small to win.\n\n
It recognizes that the adaptive stance we’re looking to instill in people is something that organizations value because people who can adapt can find ways for organizations large and small to win.\n\n
It recognizes that the adaptive stance we’re looking to instill in people is something that organizations value because people who can adapt can find ways for organizations large and small to win.\n\n
It recognizes that the adaptive stance we’re looking to instill in people is something that organizations value because people who can adapt can find ways for organizations large and small to win.\n\n
It recognizes that the adaptive stance we’re looking to instill in people is something that organizations value because people who can adapt can find ways for organizations large and small to win.\n\n
It recognizes that the adaptive stance we’re looking to instill in people is something that organizations value because people who can adapt can find ways for organizations large and small to win.\n\n
It recognizes that the adaptive stance we’re looking to instill in people is something that organizations value because people who can adapt can find ways for organizations large and small to win.\n\n
It recognizes that the adaptive stance we’re looking to instill in people is something that organizations value because people who can adapt can find ways for organizations large and small to win.\n\n
It recognizes that the adaptive stance we’re looking to instill in people is something that organizations value because people who can adapt can find ways for organizations large and small to win.\n\n
It recognizes that the adaptive stance we’re looking to instill in people is something that organizations value because people who can adapt can find ways for organizations large and small to win.\n\n
It recognizes that the adaptive stance we’re looking to instill in people is something that organizations value because people who can adapt can find ways for organizations large and small to win.\n\n
It recognizes that the adaptive stance we’re looking to instill in people is something that organizations value because people who can adapt can find ways for organizations large and small to win.\n\n
It recognizes that the adaptive stance we’re looking to instill in people is something that organizations value because people who can adapt can find ways for organizations large and small to win.\n\n
It recognizes that the adaptive stance we’re looking to instill in people is something that organizations value because people who can adapt can find ways for organizations large and small to win.\n\n
It recognizes that the adaptive stance we’re looking to instill in people is something that organizations value because people who can adapt can find ways for organizations large and small to win.\n\n
It recognizes that the adaptive stance we’re looking to instill in people is something that organizations value because people who can adapt can find ways for organizations large and small to win.\n\n
It recognizes that the adaptive stance we’re looking to instill in people is something that organizations value because people who can adapt can find ways for organizations large and small to win.\n\n