Lors de L'ESPC (European SharePoint Conference) 2014, seules 2 ou 3 solutions s'affichaient pour proposer de réaliser du Workflow sur Sharepoint. Lors de l'ESPC 2016, nous pouvons en compter une bonne dizaine ! Architecture, complexité de Workflow, Formulaire, Mobilité, Cloud, connecteurs... Tant de service qui diffèrent au cœur de ces solutions, nous tenterons d'en faire le tour pour que vous puissiez y voir plus clair dans cette jungle!
2. aOS Toulouse
20 juin 2017
Présentation du conférencier
• Alexandre Joly
• CEO HubCollab
• 3 ans Technical Evangelist @Nintex
• 3 ans Responsable Centre d’expertise MS/Sharepoint Sogeti
• 15 ans sur Sharepoint
• Codeur (il fut un temps…)
• Adepte des solutions NoCode/LowCode
• Local de l’étape AOS
AlexSharepoint
12. aOS Toulouse
20 juin 2017
La puissance du moteur?
• Processus complexes
• A la miliseconde
• Large masse de données
=> Solutions BPM
• Process opérationnels
…
• Process personnels
…
14. aOS Toulouse
20 juin 2017
Qui a la compétence des workflows?
• Qui est le plus capable de concevoir un workflow?
• Vos utilisateurs doivent-ils travailler sur les workflows?
• Qui va maintenir les workflows? A quelle fréquence?
• Connaissent-ils les normes?
Complexité de
prise en main
de la solution
Niveau
d’expertise
nécessaire
Coût de
développement
Réactivité /
Agilité
15. aOS Toulouse
20 juin 2017
Qui pilote?
•Les métiers
• Solution rapide
• ROI Rapide (Retour sur investissement)
• Ne pas être limité par l’IT
• Coût maitrisé.
•L’IT
• Maitrise des coûts
• Compliance
• Répondre rapidement aux besoins des
métiers
• Sécuriser sa plate-forme
• Augmenter son catalogue de services
• Ne plus être goulot d’étranglement
16. aOS Toulouse
20 juin 2017
Quel est la source de données ?
• SQL
• Sharepoint
• O365
• Azure
• CRM / ERP
• Autres..
Est-ce que
Sharepoint/O365
est bien votre
cible?
17. aOS Toulouse
20 juin 2017
A quels services doivent se connecter
les workflows ?
• Service tiers (WebService)
• SAP
• O365
• SalesForce / Dynamics CRM
• Facebook / Twitter / Linkedin
• Box / OneDrive / DropBox
Evolutivité des
interfaces
18. aOS Toulouse
20 juin 2017
Quel modèle de prix?
• Prédictif / Non-prédictif
• CAPEX :
• A la plate-forme
• Aux serveur
• OPEX : A la souscription
• A l’itération
• Au workflow
• Que payerez vous? La production? La preproduction? l’intégration?
19. aOS Toulouse
20 juin 2017
Cloud / On-Premise / Hybride?
• Solutions On-Premise sur Infrastructure dédiée
• Solutions On-Premise hébergée sur Sharepoint
• Solutions On-Premise As-A-service
• Solutions Cloud sur Infrastructure dédiée
• Solutions Office365 As-A-service
• Solutions Cloud As-A-service
• Solutions avec offres conjointes
• Solutions Full cloud
20. aOS Toulouse
20 juin 2017
Et la mobilité?
• Solutions mobiles natives
• Solutions déconnectées
• Solutions personnalisables
• Solutions mobiles évolutives (générateurs d’apps)
22. aOS Toulouse
20 juin 2017
• Complexité de prise en
main
• Rapidité de
développement
• Mobilité
• Services tiers
• Ouverture aux services tiers
• CAPEX / OPEX
• Modèle de prix
• Coût
• On-Premise / Cloud
• Stockages des données
• Moteur de workflows
Infra Prix
Utilisateurs /
développeursIntégration
For years, BPM and ERP vendors have been trying to sell into the mid-market, trying to increase the agility, but downsize the TCO of their products. It hasn’t worked.
Customers don’t want to wait for 6 month change cycles anymore.
And think about the money they have been justifying on applications like SAP, Oracle, Lotus Notes. Hundreds of thousands of dollars per year.
For years, BPM and ERP vendors have been trying to sell into the mid-market, trying to increase the agility, but downsize the TCO of their products. It hasn’t worked.
Customers don’t want to wait for 6 month change cycles anymore.
And think about the money they have been justifying on applications like SAP, Oracle, Lotus Notes. Hundreds of thousands of dollars per year.
For years, BPM and ERP vendors have been trying to sell into the mid-market, trying to increase the agility, but downsize the TCO of their products. It hasn’t worked.
Customers don’t want to wait for 6 month change cycles anymore.
And think about the money they have been justifying on applications like SAP, Oracle, Lotus Notes. Hundreds of thousands of dollars per year.
For years, BPM and ERP vendors have been trying to sell into the mid-market, trying to increase the agility, but downsize the TCO of their products. It hasn’t worked.
Customers don’t want to wait for 6 month change cycles anymore.
And think about the money they have been justifying on applications like SAP, Oracle, Lotus Notes. Hundreds of thousands of dollars per year.
For years, BPM and ERP vendors have been trying to sell into the mid-market, trying to increase the agility, but downsize the TCO of their products. It hasn’t worked.
Customers don’t want to wait for 6 month change cycles anymore.
And think about the money they have been justifying on applications like SAP, Oracle, Lotus Notes. Hundreds of thousands of dollars per year.
For years, BPM and ERP vendors have been trying to sell into the mid-market, trying to increase the agility, but downsize the TCO of their products. It hasn’t worked.
Customers don’t want to wait for 6 month change cycles anymore.
And think about the money they have been justifying on applications like SAP, Oracle, Lotus Notes. Hundreds of thousands of dollars per year.
For years, BPM and ERP vendors have been trying to sell into the mid-market, trying to increase the agility, but downsize the TCO of their products. It hasn’t worked.
Customers don’t want to wait for 6 month change cycles anymore.
And think about the money they have been justifying on applications like SAP, Oracle, Lotus Notes. Hundreds of thousands of dollars per year.