SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 25
chapter 13

socio-organizational
issues and stakeholder
requirements
socio-organizational issues and
stakeholder requirements
• Organizational issues affect acceptance
– conflict & power, who benefits, encouraging use

• Stakeholders
– identify their requirements in organizational context

• Socio-technical models
– human and technical requirements

• Soft systems methodology
– broader view of human and organizational issues

• Participatory design
– includes the user directly in the design process

• Ethnographic methods
– study users in context, unbiased perspective
Organisational issues
Organisational factors can make or break a system
Studying the work group is not sufficient
– any system is used within a wider context
– and the crucial people need not be direct users

Before installing a new system must understand:
– who benefits
– who puts in effort
– the balance of power in the organisation
… and how it will be affected

Even when a system is successful
… it may be difficult to measure that success
Conflict and power
?
CSCW = computer supported cooperative work
– people and groups have conflicting goals
– systems assuming cooperation will fail!
e.g. computerise stock control
stockman looses control of information
⇒ subverts the system

identify stakeholders – not just the users
Organisational structures
• Groupware affects organisational structures
– communication structures reflect line management
– email – cross-organisational communication

Disenfranchises lower management
⇒ disaffected staff and ‘sabotage’
Technology can be used to change management
style and power structures
– but need to know that is what we are doing
– and more often an accident !
Invisible workers
Telecommunications improvements allow:
– neighbourhood workcentres
– home-based tele-working

Many ecological and economic benefits
– reduce car travel
– flexible family commitments

but:
– ‘management by presence’ doesn't work
– presence increases perceived worth
– problems for promotion

Barriers to tele-working are managerial/social
not technological
Benefits for all?
Disproportionate effort
who puts in the effort ≠ who gets the benefit

Example: shared diary:
– effort: secretaries and subordinates, enter data
– benefit: manager easy to arrange meetings
– result: falls into disuse

Solutions:
– coerce use !
– design in symmetry
Free rider problem
no bias, but still problem
possible to get benefit without doing work
if everyone does it, system falls into disuse
e.g. electronic conferences
– possible to read but never contribute

solutions:
strict protocols (e.g., round robin)
increase visibility – rely on social pressure
Critical mass
Early telephone system:
few subscribers – no one to ring
lots of subscribers – never stops ringing!

Electronic communications similar:
benefit ∝ number of subscribers
early users have negative cost/benefit
need critical mass to give net benefits

How to get started?
– look for cliques to form core user base
– design to benefit an initial small user base
Critical mass
strong benefit when
lots of users

.. but little benefit
for early users

solution – increase
zero point benefit
Evaluating the benefits
Assuming we have avoided the pitfalls!
How do we measure our success?
job satisfaction and information flow
– hard to measure
economic benefit
– diffuse throughout organisation

But ..
costs of hardware and software
… only too obvious

Perhaps we have to rely on hype!
capturing requirements
• need to identify requirements within context of
use
• need to take account of
– stakeholders
– work groups and practices
– organisational context

• many approaches including
–
–
–
–

socio-technical modelling
soft system modelling
participatory design
contextual inquiry
who are the stakeholders?
• system will have many stakeholders
with potentially conflicting interests
• stakeholder is anyone effected by
success or failure of system
– primary - actually use system
– secondary - receive output or provide input
– tertiary - no direct involvement but effected
by success or failure
– facilitating - involved in development or
deployment of system
who are the stakeholders?
Example: Classifying stakeholders – an airline booking
system
An international airline is considering introducing a new
booking system for use by associated travel agents to sell
flights directly to the public.
Primary stakeholders: travel agency staff, airline booking
staff
Secondary stakeholders: customers, airline management
Tertiary stakeholders: competitors, civil aviation
authorities, customers’ travelling companions, airline
shareholders
Facilitating stakeholders: design team, IT department staff
who are the stakeholders?
• designers need to meet as many
stakeholder needs as possible
– usually in conflict so have to prioritise
– often priority decreases as move down
categories e.g. primary most important
– not always e.g. life support machine
socio-technical modelling
• response to technological determinism
• concerned with technical, social, organizational
and human aspects of design
• describes impact of specific technology on
organization
• information gathering: interviews, observation,
focus groups, document analysis
• several approaches e.g.
– CUSTOM
– OSTA
CUSTOM
• Six stage process - focus on stakeholders
– describe organizational context, including primary goals,
physical characteristics, political and economic background
– identify and describe stakeholders including personal
issues, role in the organization and job
– identify and describe work-groups whether formally
constituted or not
– identify and describe task–object pairs i.e. tasks to be
performed and objects used
– identify stakeholder needs: stages 2–4 described in terms
of both current and proposed system - stakeholder needs
are identified from the differences between the two
– consolidate and check stakeholder requirements against
earlier criteria
OSTA
• Eight stage model - focus on task
– primary task identified in terms of users’ goals
– task inputs to system identified
– external environment into which the system will be
introduced is described, including physical, economic and
political aspects
– transformation processes within the system are described
in terms of actions performed on or with objects
– social system is analyzed, considering existing internal and
external work-groups and relationships
– technical system is described in terms of configuration and
integration with other systems
– performance satisfaction criteria are established, indicating
social and technical requirements of system
– new technical system is specified
soft systems methodology
• no assumption of technological solution emphasis on understanding situation fully
• developed by Checkland
• seven stages
– recognition of problem and initiation of analysis
– detailed description of problem situation
• rich picture
– generate root definitions of system
• CATWOE
– conceptual model - identifying transformations
– compare real world to conceptual model
– identify necessary changes
– determine actions to effect changes
CATWOE
•
•
•
•

Clients: those who receive output or benefit from the system
Actors: those who perform activities within the system
Transformations: the changes that are affected by the system
Weltanschauung: (from the German) or World View - how the
system is perceived in a particular root definition
• Owner: those to whom the system belongs, to whom it is
answerable and who can authorize changes to it
• Environment: the world in which the system operates and by
which it is influenced
Participatory design
In participatory design:
workers enter into design context
In ethnography (as used for design):
designer enters into work context
Both make workers feel valued in design
… encourage workers to ‘own’ the products
Participatory Design
• User is an active member of the design team.
• Characteristics
– context and work oriented rather than system oriented
– collaborative
– iterative

• Methods
–
–
–
–

brain-storming
storyboarding
workshops
pencil and paper exercises
ETHICS
• participatory socio-technical approach devised
by Mumford
– system development is about managing change
– non-participants more likely to be dissatisfied

• three levels of participation
– consultative, representative, consensus

• design groups including stakeholder
representatives make design decisions
• job satisfaction is key to solution
Ethnography
very influential in CSCW
a form of anthropological study with special
focus on social relationships
does not enter actively into situation
seeks to understand social culture
unbiased and open ended
contextual inquiry
• Approach developed by Holtzblatt
– in ethnographic tradition but acknowledges and challenges
investigator focus
– model of investigator being apprenticed to user to learn
about work
– investigation takes place in workplace - detailed
interviews, observation, analysis of communications,
physical workplace, artefacts
– number of models created:
• sequence, physical, flow, cultural, artefact
• models consolidated across users

– output indicates task sequences, artefacts and
communication channels needed and physical and cultural
constraints

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Semelhante a E3 chap-13

HUman computer Interaction Socio-organizational Issues.ppt
HUman computer Interaction Socio-organizational Issues.pptHUman computer Interaction Socio-organizational Issues.ppt
HUman computer Interaction Socio-organizational Issues.ppt
Jayaprasanna4
 
HUman computer Interaction Socio-organizational Issues.ppt
HUman computer Interaction Socio-organizational Issues.pptHUman computer Interaction Socio-organizational Issues.ppt
HUman computer Interaction Socio-organizational Issues.ppt
Jayaprasanna4
 
Dtui5 chap03rev
Dtui5 chap03revDtui5 chap03rev
Dtui5 chap03rev
ricky5476
 
Requirement engineering in S/W Engineering
Requirement engineering in S/W EngineeringRequirement engineering in S/W Engineering
Requirement engineering in S/W Engineering
Mikel Raj
 
Part7-updated.pptx descrription of lectures
Part7-updated.pptx descrription of lecturesPart7-updated.pptx descrription of lectures
Part7-updated.pptx descrription of lectures
mohammedderriche2
 
Pressman ch-21-project-management-concepts
Pressman ch-21-project-management-conceptsPressman ch-21-project-management-concepts
Pressman ch-21-project-management-concepts
seethaveera
 
Socio Technical Systems
Socio Technical SystemsSocio Technical Systems
Socio Technical Systems
Vikram Rao
 
system development life cycle
system development life cycle system development life cycle
system development life cycle
Sumit Yadav
 
PLANNING PHASE(1).pdf and designing phases
PLANNING PHASE(1).pdf and designing phasesPLANNING PHASE(1).pdf and designing phases
PLANNING PHASE(1).pdf and designing phases
hamdiabdrhman
 

Semelhante a E3 chap-13 (20)

HUman computer Interaction Socio-organizational Issues.ppt
HUman computer Interaction Socio-organizational Issues.pptHUman computer Interaction Socio-organizational Issues.ppt
HUman computer Interaction Socio-organizational Issues.ppt
 
HUman computer Interaction Socio-organizational Issues.ppt
HUman computer Interaction Socio-organizational Issues.pptHUman computer Interaction Socio-organizational Issues.ppt
HUman computer Interaction Socio-organizational Issues.ppt
 
HCI 3e - Ch 13: Socio-organizational issues and stakeholder requirements
HCI 3e - Ch 13:  Socio-organizational issues and stakeholder requirementsHCI 3e - Ch 13:  Socio-organizational issues and stakeholder requirements
HCI 3e - Ch 13: Socio-organizational issues and stakeholder requirements
 
Socio organizational issues ppt
Socio organizational issues pptSocio organizational issues ppt
Socio organizational issues ppt
 
Dtui5 chap03rev
Dtui5 chap03revDtui5 chap03rev
Dtui5 chap03rev
 
information system analysis and design
information system analysis and designinformation system analysis and design
information system analysis and design
 
eduHcc lesson2-3
eduHcc lesson2-3eduHcc lesson2-3
eduHcc lesson2-3
 
Hci
HciHci
Hci
 
Requirement engineering in S/W Engineering
Requirement engineering in S/W EngineeringRequirement engineering in S/W Engineering
Requirement engineering in S/W Engineering
 
Usability requirements
Usability requirements Usability requirements
Usability requirements
 
Part7-updated.pptx descrription of lectures
Part7-updated.pptx descrription of lecturesPart7-updated.pptx descrription of lectures
Part7-updated.pptx descrription of lectures
 
Pressman ch-21-project-management-concepts
Pressman ch-21-project-management-conceptsPressman ch-21-project-management-concepts
Pressman ch-21-project-management-concepts
 
Innovation Plat Form
Innovation Plat FormInnovation Plat Form
Innovation Plat Form
 
socio technical system theory.pdf
socio technical system theory.pdfsocio technical system theory.pdf
socio technical system theory.pdf
 
Socio Technical Systems
Socio Technical SystemsSocio Technical Systems
Socio Technical Systems
 
system development life cycle
system development life cycle system development life cycle
system development life cycle
 
PLANNING PHASE(1).pdf and designing phases
PLANNING PHASE(1).pdf and designing phasesPLANNING PHASE(1).pdf and designing phases
PLANNING PHASE(1).pdf and designing phases
 
software requirement
software requirement software requirement
software requirement
 
System development life cycle
System development life cycleSystem development life cycle
System development life cycle
 
SDLC
SDLCSDLC
SDLC
 

Último

Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactBeyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
PECB
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
QucHHunhnh
 
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdfMaking and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Chris Hunter
 
Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.
Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.
Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.
MateoGardella
 

Último (20)

Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdfWeb & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
 
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeMeasures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
 
psychiatric nursing HISTORY COLLECTION .docx
psychiatric  nursing HISTORY  COLLECTION  .docxpsychiatric  nursing HISTORY  COLLECTION  .docx
psychiatric nursing HISTORY COLLECTION .docx
 
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityParis 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
 
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxSOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
 
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfKey note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
 
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptxUnit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
 
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global ImpactBeyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
Beyond the EU: DORA and NIS 2 Directive's Global Impact
 
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
 
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptxUnit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
 
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptxINDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
 
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SDMeasures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
 
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
 
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
 
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdfMaking and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
Making and Justifying Mathematical Decisions.pdf
 
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: Structured Data, Assistants, & RAG"
 
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactAccessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
 
Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.
Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.
Gardella_Mateo_IntellectualProperty.pdf.
 
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfHoldier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
 

E3 chap-13

  • 2. socio-organizational issues and stakeholder requirements • Organizational issues affect acceptance – conflict & power, who benefits, encouraging use • Stakeholders – identify their requirements in organizational context • Socio-technical models – human and technical requirements • Soft systems methodology – broader view of human and organizational issues • Participatory design – includes the user directly in the design process • Ethnographic methods – study users in context, unbiased perspective
  • 3. Organisational issues Organisational factors can make or break a system Studying the work group is not sufficient – any system is used within a wider context – and the crucial people need not be direct users Before installing a new system must understand: – who benefits – who puts in effort – the balance of power in the organisation … and how it will be affected Even when a system is successful … it may be difficult to measure that success
  • 4. Conflict and power ? CSCW = computer supported cooperative work – people and groups have conflicting goals – systems assuming cooperation will fail! e.g. computerise stock control stockman looses control of information ⇒ subverts the system identify stakeholders – not just the users
  • 5. Organisational structures • Groupware affects organisational structures – communication structures reflect line management – email – cross-organisational communication Disenfranchises lower management ⇒ disaffected staff and ‘sabotage’ Technology can be used to change management style and power structures – but need to know that is what we are doing – and more often an accident !
  • 6. Invisible workers Telecommunications improvements allow: – neighbourhood workcentres – home-based tele-working Many ecological and economic benefits – reduce car travel – flexible family commitments but: – ‘management by presence’ doesn't work – presence increases perceived worth – problems for promotion Barriers to tele-working are managerial/social not technological
  • 7. Benefits for all? Disproportionate effort who puts in the effort ≠ who gets the benefit Example: shared diary: – effort: secretaries and subordinates, enter data – benefit: manager easy to arrange meetings – result: falls into disuse Solutions: – coerce use ! – design in symmetry
  • 8. Free rider problem no bias, but still problem possible to get benefit without doing work if everyone does it, system falls into disuse e.g. electronic conferences – possible to read but never contribute solutions: strict protocols (e.g., round robin) increase visibility – rely on social pressure
  • 9. Critical mass Early telephone system: few subscribers – no one to ring lots of subscribers – never stops ringing! Electronic communications similar: benefit ∝ number of subscribers early users have negative cost/benefit need critical mass to give net benefits How to get started? – look for cliques to form core user base – design to benefit an initial small user base
  • 10. Critical mass strong benefit when lots of users .. but little benefit for early users solution – increase zero point benefit
  • 11. Evaluating the benefits Assuming we have avoided the pitfalls! How do we measure our success? job satisfaction and information flow – hard to measure economic benefit – diffuse throughout organisation But .. costs of hardware and software … only too obvious Perhaps we have to rely on hype!
  • 12. capturing requirements • need to identify requirements within context of use • need to take account of – stakeholders – work groups and practices – organisational context • many approaches including – – – – socio-technical modelling soft system modelling participatory design contextual inquiry
  • 13. who are the stakeholders? • system will have many stakeholders with potentially conflicting interests • stakeholder is anyone effected by success or failure of system – primary - actually use system – secondary - receive output or provide input – tertiary - no direct involvement but effected by success or failure – facilitating - involved in development or deployment of system
  • 14. who are the stakeholders? Example: Classifying stakeholders – an airline booking system An international airline is considering introducing a new booking system for use by associated travel agents to sell flights directly to the public. Primary stakeholders: travel agency staff, airline booking staff Secondary stakeholders: customers, airline management Tertiary stakeholders: competitors, civil aviation authorities, customers’ travelling companions, airline shareholders Facilitating stakeholders: design team, IT department staff
  • 15. who are the stakeholders? • designers need to meet as many stakeholder needs as possible – usually in conflict so have to prioritise – often priority decreases as move down categories e.g. primary most important – not always e.g. life support machine
  • 16. socio-technical modelling • response to technological determinism • concerned with technical, social, organizational and human aspects of design • describes impact of specific technology on organization • information gathering: interviews, observation, focus groups, document analysis • several approaches e.g. – CUSTOM – OSTA
  • 17. CUSTOM • Six stage process - focus on stakeholders – describe organizational context, including primary goals, physical characteristics, political and economic background – identify and describe stakeholders including personal issues, role in the organization and job – identify and describe work-groups whether formally constituted or not – identify and describe task–object pairs i.e. tasks to be performed and objects used – identify stakeholder needs: stages 2–4 described in terms of both current and proposed system - stakeholder needs are identified from the differences between the two – consolidate and check stakeholder requirements against earlier criteria
  • 18. OSTA • Eight stage model - focus on task – primary task identified in terms of users’ goals – task inputs to system identified – external environment into which the system will be introduced is described, including physical, economic and political aspects – transformation processes within the system are described in terms of actions performed on or with objects – social system is analyzed, considering existing internal and external work-groups and relationships – technical system is described in terms of configuration and integration with other systems – performance satisfaction criteria are established, indicating social and technical requirements of system – new technical system is specified
  • 19. soft systems methodology • no assumption of technological solution emphasis on understanding situation fully • developed by Checkland • seven stages – recognition of problem and initiation of analysis – detailed description of problem situation • rich picture – generate root definitions of system • CATWOE – conceptual model - identifying transformations – compare real world to conceptual model – identify necessary changes – determine actions to effect changes
  • 20. CATWOE • • • • Clients: those who receive output or benefit from the system Actors: those who perform activities within the system Transformations: the changes that are affected by the system Weltanschauung: (from the German) or World View - how the system is perceived in a particular root definition • Owner: those to whom the system belongs, to whom it is answerable and who can authorize changes to it • Environment: the world in which the system operates and by which it is influenced
  • 21. Participatory design In participatory design: workers enter into design context In ethnography (as used for design): designer enters into work context Both make workers feel valued in design … encourage workers to ‘own’ the products
  • 22. Participatory Design • User is an active member of the design team. • Characteristics – context and work oriented rather than system oriented – collaborative – iterative • Methods – – – – brain-storming storyboarding workshops pencil and paper exercises
  • 23. ETHICS • participatory socio-technical approach devised by Mumford – system development is about managing change – non-participants more likely to be dissatisfied • three levels of participation – consultative, representative, consensus • design groups including stakeholder representatives make design decisions • job satisfaction is key to solution
  • 24. Ethnography very influential in CSCW a form of anthropological study with special focus on social relationships does not enter actively into situation seeks to understand social culture unbiased and open ended
  • 25. contextual inquiry • Approach developed by Holtzblatt – in ethnographic tradition but acknowledges and challenges investigator focus – model of investigator being apprenticed to user to learn about work – investigation takes place in workplace - detailed interviews, observation, analysis of communications, physical workplace, artefacts – number of models created: • sequence, physical, flow, cultural, artefact • models consolidated across users – output indicates task sequences, artefacts and communication channels needed and physical and cultural constraints