The document requests that the International Criminal Court open an investigation into war crimes and other criminal acts committed against the Utica International Embassy and its officials and supporters by officials of the United States government. It provides context on previous kidnappings and threats of violence. It also demands investigations and prosecutions related to the recent murder of Pearl Leo Torrey/Torry Newsome. The document argues that the ICC has jurisdiction based on the failure of the US government to investigate or prosecute these alleged crimes domestically. It requests that a new situation be opened called "Situation in USA - Utica International Embassy Matters" in memory of Torrey/Torry Newsome.
Powerful Love Spells in Phoenix, AZ (310) 882-6330 Bring Back Lost Lover
10/18/19 Letter (UIE-ICC & Michael Miller Matters)-Revised
1. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE
OCTOBER 18, 2019
DEMAND FOR INVESTIGATION(S) AND PROSECUTION(S) OF OFFICIALS/INDIVIDUALS INVOLVED
IN THE AUGUST 28, 2018 AND MARCH 25, 2019 KIDNAPPING, FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND
OTHER WAR CRIMES AGAINST THE UTICA INTERNATIONAL EMBASSY, ITS OFFICIAL – INTERIM
PRIME MINISTER VOGEL DENISE NEWSOME – ALSO WAR CRIMES AGAINST
CITIZENS/SUPPORTERS OF THE UTICA INTERNATIONAL EMBASSY
DEMAND FOR INVESTIGATION(S) AND PROSECUTION(S) OF OFFICIALS/INDIVIDUALS INVOLVED
IN THE SEPTEMBER 21, 2019, MURDER OF PEARL LEO TORREY/TORRY NEWSOME AND OTHER
WAR CRIMES…
DEMAND FOR FREEDOM OF “HOSTAGE” MICHAEL ANTHONY MILLER-EL – A/K/A BY THE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA/UNITED STATES’ DESPOTISM GOVERNMENT EMPIRE AS
MICHAEL ANTHONY MILLER
CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS (OHIO) – CRIMINAL CASE NO. 641058
2.
3. Page 1 of 95 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page
c/o Interim Prime Minister Vogel Denise Newsome
Post Office Box 31265 - Jackson, Mississippi 39286
Toll Free - (888) 700-5056 Phone: (601) 885-3324
Website: www.uticainternationalembassy.website
Email: interimpm@uticainternationalembassy.website
October 18, 2019
1
TO:
VIA EMAIL:
International Criminal Court/The Office Of The
Prosecutor – c/o Mark P. Dillon (Head of Information &
Evidence Unit) - otp.informationdesk@icc-cpi.int
Fadi El Abdallah/Spokesperson Fadi.El-Abdallah@icc-
cpi.int
ICC Public Affairs - PublicAffairs.Unit@icc-cpi.int
VIA EMAIL and/or FACSIMILE:
(202) 514-9769 and/or (202) 514-8844
Office Of The Solicitor General
United States Department of Justice
c/o Noel Francisco – Noel.Francisco@usdoj.gov
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW #5143
Washington, DC 20530
VIA EMAIL and/or FACSIMILE: (202) 225-8259
U.S. House Of Representatives
ATTN: Nancy Pelosi – Speaker Of The House
c/o Patti Ross – pattie.ross@mail.house.gov2
1236 Longworth H.O.B.
Washington, DC 20515
VIA EMAIL and/or FACSIMILE: (202) 225-8259
U.S. House Of Representatives
ATTN: Ilhan Omar - Congresswoman
c/o Kelly Misselwitz –
kelly.misselwitz@mail.house.gov
1517 Longworth H.O.B.
Washington, DC 20515
VIA EMAIL and/or FACSIMILE: (410) 243-4095
Moorish Science Temple of America:
The Asiatic Nation of North America
c/o Hakim Elamenu-El, ALLI – Executive Ruler
hakimelamenuel@yahoo.com
1050 East 33rd
Street – Suite 206
Baltimore, Maryland 21218
VIA EMAIL and/or FACSIMILE: (601) 965-4409
United States Department of Justice/Attorney General
c/o Carla J. Clark – carla.clark@usdoj.gov
c/o D. Michael Hurst – mike.hurst@usdoj.gov
501 East Court Street – Suite 4.430
Jackson, MS 39201
VIA EMAIL and/or FACSIMILE: (212) 557-3528
venezuela@venezuelaonu.gob.be, venezuela@un.int
Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela
ATTN: President Nicolas Maduro
c/o Permanent Mission of the Bolivarian Republic of
Venezuela to the United Nations
335 East 46th Street
New York, NY 10017
VIA EMAIL and/or FACSIMILE: (212) 867-7086
Permanent Mission of the Islamic Republic
Of Iran To the United Nations - iran@un.int
ATTN: His Excellency Hassan Rouhani (President)
622 Third Avenue
New York, NY 10017
FOREIGN NATIONS/LEADERS and the PUBLIC/WORLD-AT-LARGE
RE: REQUEST FOR “NEW” ICC REFERENCE NUMBER
DEMAND FOR INVESTIGATION(S) AND PROSECUTION(S) OF OFFICIALS/INDIVIDUALS INVOLVED IN
THE AUGUST 28, 2018 AND MARCH 25, 2019 KIDNAPPING, FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND OTHER
WAR CRIMES AGAINST THE UTICA INTERNATIONAL EMBASSY, ITS OFFICIAL – INTERIM PRIME
MINISTER VOGEL DENISE NEWSOME – ALSO WAR CRIMES AGAINST CITIZENS/SUPPORTERS OF THE
UTICA INTERNATIONAL EMBASSY
DEMAND FOR INVESTIGATION(S) AND PROSECUTION(S) OF OFFICIALS/INDIVIDUALS INVOLVED IN
THE SEPTEMBER 21, 2019, MURDER OF PEARL LEO TORREY/TORRY NEWSOME AND OTHER WAR
CRIMES…
DEMAND FOR FREEDOM OF “HOSTAGE” MICHAEL ANTHONY MILLER-EL – A/K/A BY THE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA/UNITED STATES’ DESPOTISM GOVERNMENT EMPIRE AS MICHAEL
ANTHONY MILLER
CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS (OHIO) – CRIMINAL CASE NO. 641058
1
Boldface, Caps, Small Caps, Italics, and Underline, etc. are used for EMPHASIS!
2
PLEASE NOTE: Links/Internet Links provided and the documents/information contained therein as well as the Pictures and the
information contained in them, are herein incorporated by reference as if set forth in full within this instant document. Information contained
herein is based on Personal Knowledge, Research, Investigations, Interviews, Beliefs, etc. and at times have been cut and pasted for usage,
etc.
4. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 2 of 95
INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT REFERENCE:
OTP-CR-367/18
Greetings!
I, Vogel Denise Newsome (Interim Prime Minister [“IPM”] of the Utica International Embassy
[“UIE”]) bring you Greetings on behalf of the UIE and its Officials and/or Citizens. This will confirm that
we are in receipt of the International Criminal Court’s (“ICC”) letter dated, “Thursday, 04 April 2019,” in
“Our Reference: OTP-CR-367/18.”
With the recent March 25, 2019, Kidnappings of myself and my Mother (Pearl Leo Torrey/Torry
Newsome) and the attempts made on our lives to have us Murdered, this letter will provide ICC Officials
with an update as to what has and/or is transpiring. As ICC Officials may know, on September 21, 2019,
the United States of America’s (“USA,” “US” and/or “United States”) Despotism Government Regime’s
Nazis/Zionists with the assistance of my Siblings (Selina Ann Newsome, Edward Earl Newsome, Cloteal
Jolquita Newsome Turner, Harvellia Lupene Newsome Thomas, Joe Lee Newsome, Geneva Rene/Renita
Newsome Mosley, Maureen Arlean/Arleen Newsome Williams), Town of Utica Mississippi Officials
(Kenneth Broome, Timothy Myles, Lisa Morris, Mary Moreland, Terence Crump, Melvin Wilson, Robin
Robinson, George Walker, Aerrione Green, Calvin Williams, Doris Ross, Johnnie McDanial, Melvin J.
Breeden Jr., June Hardwick, etc.), Hinds County Officials (Jody Owens, Robert Graham, Darrel
McQuirter, Peggy Hobson Calhoun, Mike Morgan, Bobby “Bobcat” McGowan, Carmen Y. Davis, Victor
Mason, etc.), State of Mississippi Officials (Dewey Phillip Bryant, James Matthew Hood, Perry Tate Sr.,
etc.) United States of America’s Officials (Donald John Trump, Melania Trump, Michael Richard Pence,
Karen Sue Pence, William Jefferson Clinton, Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton, Albert Arnold Gore Jr.,
George Walker Bush, Laura Welch Bush, Richard Bruce Cheney, Lynne Ann Cheney, Barack Hussein
Obama II, Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama, Joseph Robinette Biden Jr., Jill Tracy Biden, Nancy
Pelosi, Addison Mitchell McConnell Jr., Elaine Lan Chao, Randal Howard Paul, Kelley Ashby Paul, Marco
Antonio Rubio, John Glover Roberts Jr., Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Gerald Breyer,
Samuel Anthony Alito Jr., Sonia Maria Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Neil McGill Gorsuch, etc.) and their
Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz Attorney/Lawyers (Scott W. Pedigo,
Amelia Williams Koch, and “ALL” other Attorneys/Employees employed, etc.) and other CO-Conspirators
(James C. Duff, David Spears Addington), etc., were successful in each of their roles to bringing about
the Murder/Death of my Mother in furtherance of “COUNT 4: Conspiracy To Murder” of the Criminal
Complaint
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/count-4-conspiracy-to-murder-for-uiecriminal-complaint
being drafted – i.e. we advised of in our 12/06/18 Email and 01/07/19, correspondence submitted to the
ICC and others!
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/010719-utica-international-embassys-response-to-usa-shutdown-status-of-
criminal-complaintcommunication
We are presently updating the Charges in our Formal Criminal Complaint and are incorporating
these Kidnappings as well as the attempts made on my life to Murder me as well as the Murder of my
Mother Pearl Leo Torrey/Torry Newsome and now the recent July 2019, Kidnapping of Michael Anthony
Miller-EL with attempts now being made on his life to have him murdered! These Kidnappings, attempted
Murder efforts and Murder of my Mother are in keeping with the August 28, 2018, threats made by Timothy
Myles who advised me during that Kidnapping, “We got something for you…” “They’re going to do it
right this time!” Such threats which have manifested in keeping with the ongoing War Crimes and other
criminal acts leveled against the UIE, its Officials, Citizens and others in Retaliation to our moving out as
a “NEW” lawfully formed Government having satisfied the prerequisites and after making numerous
notifications and efforts to afford the United States of America’s Despotism Government Officials to
address the War Crimes, Terrorists, Racism/Discrimination and other Crimes being carried out under the
direction and leadership of Nazis, Members of the Confederate States of America, Ku Klux Klan Members
and Jews/Zionists that have INFILTRATED the USA’s Government as well as Control and Run it in their
quest of a “NEW” World Order which seeks to make the WHITE Race “Supreme” over ALL other
Races…!
5. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 3 of 95
With that being said, we are requesting that the applicable Situation in United States of America –
i.e. suggesting to be entitled, “Situation In USA – Utica International Embassy Matters” for Historical
purposes, “UNIQUE” identification and in Memory of the UIE’s IPM’s Mother Pearl Leo Torrey/Torry
Newsome! Due to such extraordinary and unique Historical undertakings, we are requesting that said
Situation be opened in keeping with the September 2003, Paper On Some Policy Issues Before The Office
Of the Prosecutor (“POSPIBTOOTP”); wherein,
EXCERPT: https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/090319-excerpt-from-international-criminal-courts-
092003-paper-on-some-policy-issues-before-the-office-of-the-prosecutor
you have the support of National forces as the Utica International Embassy (“UIE”) and the Moorish
Science Temple of America for the Asiatic Nation of North America (“MSTOA-ANOFNA”); wherein, I
have been asked to serve as the Consulate General and accepted as both Nations move forward in such
Historical VICTORIES, etc.! Our August 14, 2019, correspondence may be found at the following LINK:
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/081419-uie-letter-for-micheal-anthony-millerel-with-confirmations
A. DEMAND FOR INVESTIGATION(S) AND PROSECUTION(S) OF
OFFICIALS/INDIVIDUALS INVOLVED IN THE AUGUST 28, 2018 AND MARCH 25, 2019
KIDNAPPING, FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND OTHER WAR CRIMES AGAINST THE
UTICA INTERNATIONAL EMBASSY, ITS OFFICIAL – INTERIM PRIME MINISTER
VOGEL DENISE NEWSOME – ALSO WAR CRIMES AGAINST CITIZENS/SUPPORTERS
OF THE UTICA INTERNATIONAL EMBASSY
In regards to the above referenced matter, we further state in support of same and reference to the
POSPIBTOOTP – i.e. pictures have been added for emphasis - at:
1) At Page 2 (which states in part):
In other words, the Prosecutor will need the support of national or international forces
in order to investigate in situ. If these forces are not available, the Prosecutor will need to
investigate from outside and rely on international co-operation for the arrest and surrender
of the alleged perpetrators. . . .
6. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 4 of 95
To the extent possible the Prosecutor will encourage States to initiate their own
proceedings. As a general rule, the policy of the Office of the Prosecutor will be to undertake
investigations only where there is a clear case of failure to act by the State or States
concerned. . . .
PLEASE BE ADVISED: We have evidence to support “clear cases of evidence” of the USA’s
Despotism Government’s Officials “failure to act” on behalf of its State and/or USA and have repeatedly
“failed to initiate proceedings” on the War Crimes, Terrorist Acts, Racist/Discriminatory, Human Rights
Violations, and other Crimes, etc. reported to its Government Agencies and Officials/Lawyers, etc. by us
and/or Citizens of the UIE and/or MSTOA-ANOFNA! Such evidence which we believe the ICC Officials
already has knowledge of and/or the ability and resources available to them to obtain more (if required)!
Furthermore, with the recent War Crimes, Kidnappings, Murder(s), Crimes Against Humanity, Acts Of
Terrorism, etc. carried out against the UIE and MSTOA-ANOFNA Officials and Citizens, that a reasonable
mind may conclude that the ICC has Jurisdiction of said matters and can move forward with Investigations
and Prosecution of individuals that have perpetrated such atrocities reported herein as well as in the record
of the ICC in other Situations before the Court addressing the USA’s Officials/Citizens, etc. active
engagement in such atrocities within its own Lands/Territories and Abroad!
7. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 5 of 95
2) At Page 4 of POSPIBTOOTP
1.1. The principle of complementarity
The ICC is not intended to replace national courts, but to operate when national
structures and courts are unwilling or unable to conduct investigations and prosecutions.
. . .
Consequently, in deciding whether to investigate or prosecute, the Prosecutor must first
assess whether there is or could be an exercise of jurisdiction by national systems with
respect to particular crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court. The Prosecutor can
proceed only where States fail to act, or are not “genuinely” investigating or
prosecuting, as described in article 17 of the Rome Statute.
8. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 6 of 95
BAKER DONELSON TAMPERING & COACHING
WITNESS IN TORTURE…HEARINGS
Article 17 provides exceptions to the primacy of State jurisdiction. The Court will be
able to declare a case to be admissible when a State is unwilling or unable genuinely to
carry out the investigation or prosecution.
A State is unwilling if the national decision has been made and proceedings are or were
being undertaken for the purpose of shielding the person concerned from criminal
responsibility; there has been an unjustified delay which is inconsistent with an intent to
bring the person concerned to justice; or the proceedings were not or are not being
conducted independently or impartially.
To assess whether a State is unable to act, the Prosecutor will need to determine
whether “due to a total or substantial collapse or unavailability of its national judicial system,
the State is unable to obtain the accused or the necessary evidence and testimony or
otherwise unable to carry out its proceedings”. This provision was inserted to take account
of situations where there was a lack of central government, or a state of chaos due to the
conflict or crisis, or public disorder leading to collapse of national systems which prevents
the State from discharging its duties to investigate and prosecute crimes within the
jurisdiction of the Court. . . .
We are not asking the ICC to replace the courts of the USA/US, but to operate due to the fact
that such national structures and courts have repeatedly been unwilling and unable to conduct
investigations and prosecutions regarding the crimes that have been reported by UIE and MSTOA-
ANOFNA…
We believe that the evidence will support that the ICC has Jurisdiction by national systems to
particular crimes as:
Murder; Extermination; Enslavement; Deportation or forcible transfer of population;
Imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental
rules of international law; Torture; Rape, sexual slavery, enforced prostitution, forced
pregnancy, enforced sterilization, or any other form of sexual violence of comparable
gravity; Persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on political, racial,
national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender…, or other grounds that are universally
recognized as impermissible under international law, in connection with any act…or any
crime within the jurisdiction of the Court; Enforced disappearance of persons, The crime of
Apartheid; Other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great
suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health…
that are being carried out bythe USA/US’ Despotism Government’s Officials Nationallyand Internationally
that is presenting an ever growing presence of threats to national and international security, peace,
sovereignity, etc. Moreover, there is evidence to support the ICC’s Prosecutor(s) can proceed in that the
USA/US has failed to act and/or is not genuinely investigating nor prosecuting as described in Article 17
of the Rome Statute. Furthermore, we incorporate a Video created in support of the MOCKERY of the
USA’s Government Investigations by the likes of its Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell &
Berkowitz (“Baker Donelson”) and how Investigations are obstructed and compromised for purposes of
shielding/hiding the criminal activities and roles in War Crimes domestically/nationally as well as
internationally;
9. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 7 of 95
As of 10/17/19: https://vimeo.com/317716020
BAKER DONELSON TAMPERING & COACHING
BAKER DONELSON WITNESS DAVID ADDINGTON
IN TORTURE…HEARINGS
wherein, the USA’s President Donald
Trump (as recent as a 10/08/19 Tweet)
also advised its tribunals as “Kangaroo
Courts!” NOTE: How the White Man
and its Mainstream Media “jumped on
the bandwagon” to give Trump credit as
if such a term is new!
At least we know that the USA/US’
Legal Counsel and other Government
Officials have read pleadings drafted by
me in Legal matters!
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/0091815-bankruptcy-hearing-transcribed-townsend-matter-photos-added
10. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 8 of 95
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/082418-notice-of-nonattendance-091118-court-matter-town-of-utica-vs-
newsome
Pursuant to Article 17, “exceptions” exist to the “primacy of State Jurisdiction.”
Therefore, the ICC will be able to declare the Case/Situation we seek as the USA/US is
unwilling and/or unable genuinely to carry out the investigation(s) and/or prosecution(s)
sought.
We believe that there is sufficient evidence to support that the USA/US is unwilling
because of a national decision has been made and proceedings are being undertaken to
destroy evidence, obstruct justice, etc. for the purpose of shielding their President Donald
Trump, Congressional Members, Judicial Members and their Lawyers/Attorneys of the Law
Firm of Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz and their Co-Conspirators from
criminal responsibility. Furthermore, there has repeatedly been unjustified delays as well
as flat out refusal/failure to act on the War Crimes and/or Criminal Acts – i.e. as that
investigated and prosecuted by the ICC – reported by us. Unjustified delays and/or
failure to act are inconsistent with an intent to bring the person(s) to justice. Moreover,
proceedings regarding our complaints that have been submitted by individuals who are now
under our New Government(s) “were not or are not being conducted independently nor
impartially.”
We further believe that the evidence will support that the Prosecutor will find that there
has been a “total or substantial collapse and/or unavailability for us to use the USA/US
Judicial System.” Moreover, the USA/US and its Officials are unable and/or unwilling to
obtain the accused and/or the necessary evidence and testimony as well as unable to carry
out investigations, prosecutions and proceedings due to bias, financial interests, personal
interests, conflict-of-interests, etc.!
We believe that evidence support that the USA/US is currently in a “state of chaos due
to the conflicts-of-interests, alleged impeachment inquiry proceedings that have been
launched against their President Donald Trump, being implicated in the Situation in
Afghanistan – i.e. fear of prosecution of Heads of State, Congressional Members, Military
Members, etc., the collapse of the national system that has been infiltrated by Nazis/Zionists
which prevents the USA/US from discharging its duties to investigate and prosecute crimes
that are within the Jurisdiction of the ICC!
3) At Page 5 and 6 of POSPIBTOOTP
It should however be recalled that the system of complementarity is principally based on the
recognition that the exercise of national criminal jurisdiction is not only a right but also a duty of States.
Indeed, the principle underlying the concept of complementarity is that States remain responsible and
accountable for investigating and prosecuting crimes committed under their jurisdiction and that
national systems are expected to maintain and enforce adherence to international standards. This
principle is emphasised in the Preamble of the Rome Statute, recalling that “it is the duty of every State to
exercise its criminal jurisdiction over those responsible for international crimes”. . . .
11. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 9 of 95
1.2. What does complementarity imply for the Office of the Prosecutor?
The exercise of the Prosecutor’s functions under article 18 of notifying States of future investigations
will alert States with jurisdiction to the possibility of taking action them-selves. In a case where multiple
States have jurisdiction over the crime in question the Prosecutor should consult with those States best
able to exercise jurisdiction (e.g. primarily the State where the alleged crime was committed, the State
of nationality of the suspects, the State which has custody of the accused, and the State which has
evidence of the alleged crime) with a view to ensuring that jurisdiction is taken by the State best able to
do so.
We believe that there is evidence to support that the USA/US’ Despotism Government’s Officials
think that they are “above the law” and “cannot be prosecuted!” Thus, are irresponsible, unaccountable
and/or incompetent in the ability to investigate and prosecute the crimes reported to have been committed
within the jurisdiction of the USA/US which exhibits that its national systems are not expected to maintain
nor enforce adherence to national and/or international standards. Furthermore, concluding, that the USA/US
does not believe it is “its duty to exercise its criminal jurisdiction over those responsible for domestic
and/or international crimes”…
Because of the Global and/or International impact that multiple States have suffered from the
USA/US’ atrocities, there are multiple jurisdictions available to hold Trials for prosecution and where
crimes were committed and/or continue to be committed and, we believe, such victimized States also have
evidence of the crimes alleged that fall within the Jurisdiction of the ICC!
On or about September 28, 2019, Nicaragua’s Foreign Minister Denis Moncada made a bold call,
“to move the U.N. Headquarters out of the U.S. and also requests redesign
the organization so that all countries can participate, allowing the U.N. to
fulfill its original mandate.”
12. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 10 of 95
https://twitter.com/telesurenglish/status/1178102389355765762
The UIE stand in support of Nicaragua’s Foreign Minister’s suggestion! This is a move that is long
overdue, and, in the interest of global peace and security, etc. is advisement well taken! As the ICC may
know of Nicaragua’s tenacity in its legal action against the USA/US in Nicaragua vs United States:
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/nicaragua-vunited-statesnhighlighted
We here at the UIE and MSTOA-ANOFNA have been adversely impacted by the USA/US’
Despotism Government Officials’ roles in such War Crimes and/or Crimes within the Jurisdiction of the
ICC! Not only that, it appears from evidence published by US Senator Marco Rubio, knowledge of Juan
Guaido – i.e. the person the USA/US’ Officials had swear himself in as Interim-President of the Bolivarian
Republic of Venezuela over President Nicolas Maduro – have connections with Terrorists, Paramilitary
Groups, etc. and “IS” the Link and/or Nexus (with his National Assembly Members) that serves as an
“INSIDE” Terrorist Cell for the USA/US’ Nazis/Zionists and is a TOP/KEY Witness to the atrocities he
and Assembly Members voluntarily submitted themselves to be used in!
13. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 11 of 95
My knowledge of the USA’s Ku Klux Klan’s Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell
& Berkowitz being at the “Helm of the Ship” to carry out such Terrorist/Racist Attacks, led us to provide
responses via Twitter on behalf of the Utica International Embassy. Responses which were met with
“SWIFT” Retaliation by the Jews/Zionists in REPEATEDLY SUSPENDING Twitter Accounts for
purposes of keeping the Public/World from learning the TRUTH!
14. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 12 of 95
Venezuela’s President Nicolas Maduro seeing the Tweets from the Utica INTERNATIONAL
Embassy, reached out via Twitter and asked us for support and NOT to allow the Invasion to happen.
the UIE responded!
2. The global nature of the International Criminal Court
Despite all efforts deployed to promote State action, it is clear that there will be cases in
which national systems will not be able or willing to fulfil their principal duty of
investigating and prosecuting the most serious crimes of concern to the international
community as a whole. In such cases, the ICC must fill the gap created by the failure of
States to satisfy their duty to investigate and the Office of the Prosecutor will need to
exercise its investigative powers with firmness and efficiency, using the means and
procedures provided by the Statute. . . .
15. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 13 of 95
. . . The Prosecutor may
also be asked to act in a
situation where those who
have the legitimate monopoly
of force in a State are
themselves the ones to commit
the crimes, and the
enforcement authorities in
that State will consequently not
be available to the Prosecutor.
In circumstances such as these
the Prosecutor will not be able
to exercise his powers without
the intervention of the
international community,
whether through the use of peacekeeping forces or otherwise; the Prosecutor will not be able
to establish an office in the country concerned without being assured of its safety. He will
also have to be assured that there will be the means available for investigation, protection
of witnesses and arrest of suspects. . . .
As the ICC Officials know, “despite all efforts deployed to promote State action,” there are cases
(as this one) in which national systems will not be able or willing to fulfill their principal duty of
investigating and prosecuting serious crimes as those in which we have repeatedly reported on that
adversely impact the international community as a whole! Therefore, in such a Historical undertaking as
this one, the ICC must step in and “fill the gap” created by the USA/US’ failure to satisfy their duty to
investigate the numerous Complaints submitted by the UIE and/or MSTOA-ANOFNA. Moreover, the
ICC’s Office of the Prosecutor “will need to exercise its investigative powers with firmness and efficiency,
using the means and procedures provided by the Statute…”
As we have set forth in the draft of “COUNT 4: Conspiracy To Murder,” there is evidence to
support that in the USA/US, situations exist where (as in this case) that USA’s Legal Counsel Baker
Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz “have the legitimate monopoly of force” in the USA/US and
said Law Firm “IS” the one planning, orchestrating and carrying out under its direction and leadership,
War Crimes and/or crimes domestically and internationally. Therefore, the enforcement authorities (i.e.
Executive Branch Officials, Legislative Branch Officials and Supreme Court Justices, etc.) will NOT be
available to the ICC Prosecutor because said Branches of Government Officials are COMPLICIT in the
War Crimes being carried out and are being FINANCIALLY compensated and/or rewarded through
EMPLOYMENT, etc.! There is record evidence to support that “the very next day (April 5, 2019) after the
ICC’s letter to the UIE, the USA/US revoked the VISA of the ICC’s Prosecutor!” We believe that this
retaliatory measure was not only done to obstruct the administration of justice, but with the USA’s
Nazis/Zionists’ knowledge of the Kidnapping of the UIE’s IPM! Acts in furtherance of conspiracies to
have me Murdered were launched!
When moving forward in March 2018, with the Utica International Embassy, this name was chosen
for such purposes and interests – i.e. INTERNATIONAL! With that being said, the UIE will serve as the
platform to unite and unify the International Community in this Historical undertaking and obtaining the
support of International Communities to assist the ICC with intervention in such matters – i.e. through the
use of the applicable peacekeeping forces or otherwise! We will further strive to work with the ICC to
establish the applicable organizations needed to assure the safety of its Officials! Moreover, through said
unification goals, obtain the means available for investigation(s), protection of witnesses (i.e. as myself
and others through requested “Protective Orders/Injunctions,” etc.) and arrest of suspects…!
As of 10/14/19: https://www.icc-cpi.int/about/witnesses
16. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 14 of 95
Protection
The Court has a number of protective measures that can be granted to witnesses,
victims who appear before the Court and other persons at risk on account of
testimony given by a witness. The Court's protection system is based on best
practices which are aimed at concealing the witness's interaction with the Court from
their community and from the public in general.
Where Witnesses Reside
Protective measures where witnesses reside aim to limit the witness's exposure to
threats or provide an appropriate response to an identified threat. Measures must
be proportional to the risk. When there are multiple suitable and available options
for protective measures, the Court will choose those that are the least intrusive
on the witness's wellbeing. These measures could include local protection
measures, an assisted move or various security arrangements aimed at addressing
the identified threat. Witness relocation is only used as a last resort, due to the
immense burden this puts on the witnesses and their families.
IMPORTANT TO NOTE: The failed efforts of the USA/US’ DESPOTISM Government Officials
to take the UIE’s lawful approach in the formation of a “NEW” Government to try such method under a
“SOCIALIST” Government serves as FURTHER evidence that the UIE is a Lawfully formed “NEW”
Government within the Lands/Territories presently known as the United States of America! On May 6,
2019, the USA’s Nazis/Zionists going as far as to have a “KANGAROO” Court Hearing – i.e. DEPRIVING
me access to Legal Resources and Documents, etc. – in their QUEST to railroad me through FRIVOLOUS
USA Courts that I have been BANNED from! Therefore, affording us to bring our matters before
“INTERNATIONAL” Tribunals as the ICC, etc.
17. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 15 of 95
4) At Page 6 and 7 of POSPIBTOOTP
Should the Office seek to bring charges against all alleged perpetrators? The Statute
gives some guidance to answer this question. The Preamble affirms that “the most serious
crimes of concern to the international community as a whole must not go unpunished”. It
continues that States Parties to the Statute are determined to establish a “permanent
International Criminal Court in relationship with the United Nations system, with
jurisdiction over the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a
whole”. . . .
2.3 Modalities of investigation
In order to prove the responsibility of leaders, the investigation must put emphasis
on a comprehensive analysis of crimes committed, in order to piece together patterns and
chains of command, and to collect the type of evidence making it possible to establish
the criminal responsibility of those who designed the plans, gave the orders or otherwise
supervised or failed to prevent the commission of crimes, in accordance with the Statute.
We ask that the ICC bring the applicable charges against all alleged perpetrators and that said crimes
committed by them do not go unpunished! As the ICC Officials note, the USA/US’ Officials have gone to
great lengths to avoid prosecution. About December 2000, US President William “Bill” Clinton signed the
1998 Rome Treaty to establish an International Criminal Court! IMPORTANT TO NOTE: The
USA/US President Clinton executed the 1998 Rome Treaty approximately NINE (9) Months before the
USA’s Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz and their CO-Conspirators carried
out the September 11, 2001, DOMESTIC Terrorist Attacks on the World Trade Center Towers and
other alleged targets for purposes of creating FALSE Narratives to launch War Crimes, etc. in the Middle
East in their QUEST to push Adolf Hitler’s “World Order” Agenda!
18. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 16 of 95
As of 11/06/18, an Article regarding the USA’s
President Bill Clinton signing of the 1998 Rome
Statute, may be found at the following LINK:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/1095580.stm
While it is reported that the USA did NOT
RATIFY said Treaty, information such as this may
be used and will further SUPPORT the
Complaint(s) to be submitted to the ICC!
We do so to reaffirm our strong
support for international
accountability and for bringing to
justice perpetrators of genocide, war
crimes, and crimes against humanity.
We do so as well because we wish to
remain engaged in making the ICC an
instrument of impartial and effective
justice in the years to come. . .
The treaty requires that the ICC not
supersede or interfere with functioning
national judicial systems; that is, the
ICC prosecutor is authorised to take
action against a suspect only if the
country of nationality is unwilling or
unable to investigate allegations of
egregious crimes by their national. - -
U.S. President Bill Clinton!
The Clinton Administration signed the Rome Statute in 2000, but did not
submit it for Senate ratification. The George W. Bush Administration, the
U.S. administration at the time of the ICC’s founding, stated that it would
not join the ICC. The Obama Administration subsequently re-
established a working relationship with the Court as an observer…
U.S. President Bill Clinton originally signed the Rome Statute in 2000.
Signature of a treaty provides a preliminary endorsement, but a treaty that is
signed but not ratified is not legally binding. Signing does not create a binding
legal obligation, but does demonstrate the State’s intention to examine the
treaty domestically and consider ratifying it, and it obliges the State to
refrain from acts that would counter or undermine the treaty’s objective
and purpose...
After the Rome Statute reached the requisite 60 ratifications in 2002,
President George W. Bush‘s Administration sent a note to the U.N.
Secretary-General on May 6, 2002. The note informed the Secretary-General
that the U.S. no longer intend to ratify the Rome Statute, and that it did
not recognize any obligation toward the Rome Statute.
The Obama Administration stated its intent to cooperate with the ICC.
Cooperation with the Assembly of States Parties of the ICC was a key
component of the Obama Administration’s first National Security Strategy.
On November 16, 2009, the Ambassador-at-Large for War Crimes
Issues, Stephen Rapp, announced that he would lead the U.S. delegation to
the ICC’s annual meeting of the Assembly of States Parties in The Hague.
He told journalists “Our government has now made the decision that
Americans will return to engagement at the ICC.”,.. - - As of 10/14/19:
https://www.iapss.org/2018/10/23/history-of-the-us-international-criminal-court-relations/
19. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 17 of 95
It is the USA’s Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz who PLANNED,
ORCHESTRATED and CARRIED OUT the September 11, 2001, Domestic Terrorist Attacks on the
World Trade Center Towers and NOT Osama Bin Laden! Can we LAY OUT THE FACTS and
EVIDENCE? YES!
1) According to Hillary Clinton – i.e. who served as First Lady under USA/US President William
“Bill” Clinton, US Senator for the State of New York, US Secretary of State under USA/US
President Barack Obama, and ran for President of the USA/US and LOST each time, she
ACKNOWLEDGES that under President Ronald Regan…the USA/US’:
a) “CREATION” of Terrorist Forces in the Pakistan Region – i.e. as Mujahideen, Al
Qaeda, ISIS, etc. (from research, there is evidence of USA/US Relationship with the
Bin Laden Family, etc. before the September 11, 2001, DOMESTIC Terrorist
Attacks on the World Trade Center Towers and other alleged Targets!)
b) “EQUIPPING” the USA/US Terrorist Forces with “stinger missiles and everything
else” to go inside Afghanistan…
c) “TRAINING” and “LEAVING” the USA/US Terrorist Forces in the Middle East
Region…
d) “ADMISSION” to leaving Terrorist Group(s) “WELL ARMED” and
“CREATION” of a “MESS!”
e) “NOW FIGHTING” the Terrorists the USA/US “CREATED, TRAINED and
SUPPORTED!”
Slideshare: https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/hillary-clinton-united-states-of-americas-terrorist-
roles
20. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 18 of 95
PATTERN OF PRACTICE
HAVE CHASED RUSSIA INTO AFGHANISTAN
HAVE CHASED RUSSIA INTO SYRIA
HAVE CHASED RUSSIA INTO NORTH KOREA
HAVE CHASED RUSSIA INTO VENEZUELA….
USING USA TERRORIST CELLS and SCRIPTS
Slideshare: https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/040717-u-s-ambassador-nikki-haley-confesses-to-
united-states-war-of-aggression-on-040617-in-syria-airstrikes
We believe that there is sufficient evidence to support the Prima Facie requirements have been
met to support the USA/US’ DESPOTISM Government Officials’, their Legal Counsel Baker Donelson’s
and CO-Conspirators’ engagement in “WAR OF AGGRESSION” against Sovereign Nations/States.
Wherein a PATTERN-OF-PRACTICE can be established regarding the Sovereignty of other States of
the USA/US’ War of Aggression:
Declaration of War “WITHOUT” probable cause
INVASION of USA’s Armed Forces, “WITHOUT” a Declaration of War, of the
Territory of ANOTHER State
ATTACKS by USA’s Land, Naval or Air Forces, “WITHOUT” a Declaration of War,
on the Territory, Vessels or Aircraft of ANOTHER State
NAVAL “BLOCKADE” of the “COASTS or PORTS” of ANOTHER State
USA’s “PROVISION OF SUPPORT” to its Terrorist Cells/Members through
“UNLAWFUL” Sanctions against “SOVEREIGN” Nations for purposes of
FINANCING USA Terrorism within the Territory of ANOTHER State
“REQUEST” of “UNLAWFULLY Invaded” States to use “ALL Power” to
“DEPRIVE” USA’s Terrorist Cells/Members of “ALL”
ASSISTANCE/PROTECTION…
21. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 19 of 95
Slideshare: https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/hillary-clinton-dealing-with-the-united-states-of-
americas-stingers
Hillary Clinton providing TESTIMONY of USA/US’:
i) History of moving in and out of Pakistan.
ii) The allege Terrorists being fought are those with the USA/US “FUNDING” and
“SUPPORT!”
iii) “PERSONAL VENDETTA” against Russia.
iv) “CREATION” of Terrorist Cells (as Mujahideen, Al Qaeda, ISIS, etc.) in
Pakistan/Afghanistan…- i.e. NOW being used throughout the Middle East and
other Foreign Nations
v) “CONSPIRACY” with REPUBLICAN President Ronald Reagan Administration
and “DEMOCRAT-Led” Congress…
vi) “DEALING” with the ISI – i.e. Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence Agency –
Pakistani Military…
IMPORTANT TO NOTE:
From research, we have found that the USA/US in its PERSONAL vendetta against Russia agreed
to pay BILLIONS OF DOLLARS to Pakistan – i.e. moreover PRESSURED the Pakistan Government
into joining their FRIVOLOUS “US War on Terrorism!”
22. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 20 of 95
Since posting such information the USA’s Zionists have done their best to FINE-TUNE information:
As of 06/06/12, here is the posting in SlideShare:
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/pakistan-united-states-relations
In keeping with the USA’s TRUE FORM of BETRAYAL, the Pakistan
Government and its Officials, etc. have been left “HOLDING THE BAG” as
the USA/US has abandoned them and CONTINUES to “SANCTION” said
State as Hillary Clinton advised is done for States that OPPOSE the USA/US’!
23. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 21 of 95
As of 10/16/19:
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-pakistan-usa-sanctions/u-s-sanctions-pakistani-companies-over-nuclear-trade-
idUSKBN1H20IO
vii) “RECRUITMENT” of Mujahideen from “Saudi Arabia and other places…”
IMPORTANT TO NOTE: The USA/US Department of Justice have EVIDENCE of Members of the
USA’s Terrorist Cells (as Mujahideen) are part of the “NORTH American SUPPORT Cell designed to send
money, physical assets, and mujahideen recruits to overseas jihad conflicts.” Operating from MANY cities
within the Lands/Territories of the United States of America and SUPPORTED and COORDINATED with
other support Networks and Mujahideen Groups engaging in VIOLENT War Crimes… --- As of 10/16/19 this
information may be found at the following LINKS:
https://www.justice.gov/archive/opa/pr/2005/November/05_crm_624.html
http://uticainternationalembassy.website/index.php/k2/11-22-05-jose-padilla-charged-with-conspiracy-to-murder
24. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 22 of 95
From Hillary Clinton’s TESTIMONY, she shared how the USA/US created the Terrorist Cell of the
Mujahideen. Therefore, we believe a reasonable mind may conclude from US Department of Justice information
that Terrorist Cell Members of the Mujahideen were brought to the USA for TRAINING, etc.
viii) “IMPORTING” Saudi Arabia’s “WAHABI-Brand of Islam…”
ix) “CREATION of Terrorist Cell STINGERS” throughout the Middle East Region
x) “PLANTING MINES along the BOARDERS…”
xi) “ABRUPTLY CUTTING OFF Relationships” with Nations and their Leaders and
Military…
xii) “ABUSING SANCTIONING POWERS” against Nations BETRAYED!
25. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 23 of 95
https://books.google.com/books?id=MRA2jIyejwAC&pg=PA345&lpg=PA345&dq=Cheney%27s+Guys+barely+known+outsi
de+Washington%27s+corridors+of+%22power,+but+David+Addington+is+the+most+powerful+man+you%27ve+never+hear
d+of%22&source=bl&ots=3xnMk09BWw&sig=ACfU3U3k_JAue5Yxk4EGN4Ylp1d-
dSTv5Q&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiut-XU-KHlAhVIQ6wKHZWtA7kQ6AEwBHoECAkQAQ
26. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 24 of 95
The referenced May 29, 2006, U.S. News & World Report Article entitled, "Cheney's Guy. He's barely
known outside Washington's corridors of power, but David Addington is the most powerful man you've never heard
of. Here's why," was published also at LINKS provided here:
https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/David_S._Addington However, only AFTER being
PUBLISHED in my SlideShare Forum (about October 1, 2012) this Article has since been REMOVED!
WHY The David Spears Addington
Information Is IMPORTANT!
Under Baker Donelson’s “PLANNING” Stage of the 9/11 Attacks which occurred during US President
Ronald Regan’s (who was suffering from Alzheimer) Administration, Addington served as:
Assistant General Counsel – Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
Counsel – House Permanent Select Intelligence Committee
Counsel – House International Relations Committee
Special Assistant For Legislative Affairs – Office Of Intergovernmental
Affairs White House
Deputy Assistant – Executive Office of the President
27. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 25 of 95
It was also during the President Reagan Administration, Baker Donelson sent in their Attorney
Howard Henry Baker Jr. to serve as his “CHIEF OF STAFF!” Baker who “prior” to said position served
as the “MAJORITY” Leader of the US Senate! Baker was the “FIRST” Republican to be elected to the
US Senate in Tennessee (Member State of the Confederate States of America) since the
“RECONSTRUCTION” Era!
As of 10/17/19: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howard_Baker
Preserved at:
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/bd-howard-baker-wiki-info
28. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 26 of 95
Reconstruction, in U.S. history, the period (1865–77) that followed the
American Civil War and during which attempts were made to redress the inequities
of slavery and its political, social, and economic legacy and to solve the problems
arising from the readmission to the Union of the 11 states that had seceded at or
before the outbreak of war. Long portrayed by many historians as a time when
vindictive Radical Republicans fastened black supremacy upon the defeated
Confederacy, Reconstruction has since the late 20th century been viewed more
sympathetically as a laudable experiment in interracial democracy… - - As of
10/17/19: https://www.britannica.com/event/Reconstruction-United-States-history
By the end of the Civil War, the South was in a state of political
upheaval, social disorder, and economic decay. The Union’s tactics of total
war destroyed southern crops, plantations, and entire cities, and hundreds of
thousands of emancipated slaves rushed to Union lines as their masters fled
the oncoming Union army. Inflation became so severe that by the end of the
war a loaf of bread cost several hundred Confederate dollars. Thousands of
southerners starved to death, and many who did not starve lost
everything they owned: clothing, homes, land, and slaves. As a result, by
1865, policymakers in Washington had the nearly impossible task of southern
Reconstruction.
Reconstruction encompassed three major initiatives: restoration of the
Union, transformation of southern society, and enactment of progressive
legislation favoring the rights of freed slaves...—As of 10/17/19:
https://www.sparknotes.com/history/american/reconstruction/context/
As of 10/17/19:
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/united-states-of-americas-ku-klux-klan-run-government
During US President George H. W. Bush’s (father of George W. Bush) Administration, keep in
mind that Baker Donelson did a “DRY RUN” launching the 1993 Attacks on the World Trade Center
Towers – i.e. it appears “FRAMING” others (as Eyad Ismoil) for the USA’s DOMESTIC Terrorist
Attacks and War Crimes…
29. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 27 of 95
For instance, according to information published regarding Eyad Ismoil, who claimed his innocence
regarding the alleged Terrorist Attacks on the World Trade Center in 1993, it states:
According to Ismoil's attorney, Louis Aidala, Ismoil was tricked into
cooperating with the others, and had in fact loaded the explosives into the
van, thinking they were cleaning supplies.
Throughout the trial, Ismoil continued to maintain his innocence, saying:
"Jail me and you will add one number to the wrong list. But
don't think that you will ever rest because tyrants always end
up in trouble."
https://govinfo.library.unt.edu/911/report/911Report_Ch3.htm (This document has been preserved). Under
the US President George H.W. Bush’s Administration, David Addington served as:
Special Assistant To Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney
Republican Staff Director – Senate Select Intelligence Committee
It appears from research that under the
“ORCHESTRATION” phase of Baker
Donelson and their CO-Conspirators setting up
for the September 11, 2001, DOMESTIC
Terrorist Attacks on the World Trade Center
Towers and other alleged Targets under US
President William “Bill” Clinton’s
Administration, they relied on KNOWLEDGE
and INFORMATION of Employees – i.e. as
Albert Randall (who served as Assistant Chief
Counsel, Legislation) of the Federal Aviation
Administration (“FAA”) to obtain documents
on the allege Airline(s) to be used as well as
Flight Records!
As with US President Donald Trump, who has a
great deal of time to spend on “TWITTER” to
ENTERTAIN and present DISTRACTIONS
because he is merely a “FRONT” under the
USA’s Despotism Government Empire; so it was
with US President William “Bill” Clinton. Bill
Clinton also had a great deal of time to play around
with Monica Lewinsky – i.e. the DISTRACTION
used by Baker Donelson to “ENTERTAIN” the
Public/World as they moved forward with their
9/11 DOMESTIC Terrorism Agenda!
As of 10/17/19, the Monica Lewinsky information
may be found at the following LINKS:
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/lewinsky-
monicawikipedia-info
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/monica-
lewinsky-president-clinton-scandal
30. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 28 of 95
According to information published on Baker Donelson’s website, as of 10/17/19, it THRIVES on
BOASTING about Albert Randall’s “25-year career with the Federal Aviation Administration as the
Assistant CHIEF Counsel for LEGISLATION!” Baker Donelson recruiting and employing TOP/KEY
FAA Officials and then RELISHING and BROADCASTING such achievements PUBLICLY to
ANNOUNCE their SUCCESSES!
Mr. Randall joined Baker Donelson after a 25-year career with the
Federal Aviation Administration. He previously served as the FAA's
Assistant Chief Counsel for Legislation, overseeing the agency's
participation in several hundred Congressional hearings on the full-
range of aviation issues, including matters such as security, air traffic
control, safety regulations, air carrier surveillance, and airport funding.
- -
https://www.bakerdonelson.com/Albert-B-Randall
As of 10/1719: https://www.bakerdonelson.com/aviation-and-aerospace
Then you also have Linda Daschle, who under US Presidents Reagan or George H.W. Bush,
served as:
Director/Regional Director – Civil Aeronautics
Director, Federal Affairs – Air Transport Association of America
Senior Vice President – American Association of Airport Executives
31. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 29 of 95
As of 10/16/19: https://aireon.com/company/board-of-directors/linda-hall-daschle/
Under President Bill Clinton, Linda Daschle served as:
Deputy Administrator – Federal Aviation Administration
Acting Administrator – Federal Aviation Administration
Senior Public Policy Advisor – Federal Aviation Administration (i.e. going straight
to Baker Donelson upon leaving the FAA - - as did her husband Thomas Daschle [a
former US Senator who sought to be Secretary of the Department of Health and
Human Services but FAILED] under US President Barack Obama)
As of 10/16/19: https://www.opensecrets.org/revolving/rev_summary.php?id=50112
On September 11, 2001, the United States of America’s Legal Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman
Caldwell & Berkowitz pulled off one of the MOST HIDEOUS and HORRIFIC “DOMESTIC” Terrorist
Attacks on USA Soil and FRAMED other individuals for their WAR Crimes and other ATROCITIES for
purposes of launching their “WAR on Terrorism” SCAM for purposes of beginning Wars in the Middle
East Region in their QUEST to gain control of the STATES and their RESOURCES in said Region and
to push the “WHITE” Supremacist Agenda and/or the “NEW” World Order Agenda designed after Adolf
Hitler’s World Order Agenda!
32. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 30 of 95
Under Baker Donelson’s “CARRYING OUT” Stage of the 9/11 Attacks which occurred during
US President George W. Bush’s Administration, Addington served as:
Legal Counsel – Vice President’s Office
Chief of Staff – Executive Office of the President
The USA’s Legal Counsel Baker Donelson, with KNOWLEDGE of the onslaught of War Crimes
and other criminal activities to be carried out! About October 2001, the USA and its “EUROPEAN” Allies
moved “SWIFTLY” to launch a BARRAGE of War Crimes and other Crimes in the Middle East Region
and BEYOND, etc. using Afghanistan as their “LAUNCHING PAD” for the “NEW” World Order
Agenda!
33. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 31 of 95
As of 10/17/19: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_in_Afghanistan_(2001%E2%80%93present)
So, given such FACTUAL EVIDENCE, Baker Donelson’s Lawyers/Attorneys/Employees and
their CO-Conspirators and Clients, etc. - as the USA/US’ DESPOTISM Government Officials/Employees
- are “ALLOWING” the use of the USA’s Executive, Legislative and Judicial Branches of Government
to be used to “CARRY OUT” such GLOBAL and INTERNATIONAL Atrocities against other STATES,
their Leaders/Officials/Citizens, etc. Said Law Firm of Baker Donelson (i.e. Lawyers/Attorneys who are
WHITE Supremacists, Members of the Confederate State of America and Ku Klux Klan, etc.) was allowed
to INFILTRATE and TAKE CONTROL of the USA’s Government and create a “DESPOTISM” Empire
and move forward with their “NEW” World Order “SLAVERY” Agendas of People-Of-Color and/or
Nations-Of-Color! Under “COUNT 4: Conspiracy To Murder” we here at the Utica INTERNATIONAL
Embassy set forth “HOW” the USA’s Legal Counsel Baker Donelson and its CO-Conspirators have taken
Adolf Hitler’s “WORLD Order” Agenda and are IMPLEMENTING it today under the GUISE of the
“NEW World Order!”
As of 10/17/19: https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/count-4-conspiracy-to-murder-for-uiecriminal-
complaint
To GAIN control and running of the
United States Department of Justice and its
Agencies (as the Federal Bureau of
Investigation since infiltration of the
Central Intelligence Agency occurred
during David Addington’s Employment as
“Assistant General Counsel” for the CIA,
etc.) during the LAUNCHING of the
September 11, 2001, World Trade Center
DOMESTIC Terrorist Attacks, Baker
Donelson placed their Lawyer Lee Rawls
in position as Counsel/Chief of Staff for
the Director of the Federal Bureau of
Investigation (“FBI”) – Robert Mueller.
So, at the time of the September 11, 2001,
Domestic Terrorist Attacks, you have
Baker Donelson Lawyers/Attorneys
serving as “CHIEF OF STAFF” for the
FBI and David Addington serving as
“CHIEF OF STAFF” for US Vice
President Richard “Dick” Cheney for
purposes of what are known as these
“FOXES Guarding the HENHOUSE!”
34. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 32 of 95
We believe that there is sufficient evidence to prove the responsibility of the USA/US’ Despotism
Government and the Nazis/Zionists that control and run said Despot! Investigation(s) that put emphasis on
the comprehensiveness of the crimes committed, which will support a “Pattern-Of-Practice” and “Chains
Of Command” needed to establish the criminal responsibility of USA/US Officials and their Legal Counsel
Baker Donelson and their Co-Conspirators that “designed the plans, gave the orders or otherwise
supervised or failed to prevent the commission of crimes, in accordance with the Statute!”
As of 10/09/19: https://www.icc-cpi.int/about/witnesses
PROTECTION:
The Court has a number of protective measures that can be granted to witnesses,
victims who appear before the Court and other persons at risk on account of testimony given
by a witness. The Court's protection system is based on best practices which are aimed at
concealing the witness's interaction with the Court from their community and from the public
in general.
WHERE WITNESSES RESIDE:
Protective measures where witnesses reside aim to limit the witness's exposure to
threats or provide an appropriate response to an identified threat. Measures must be
proportional to the risk. When there are multiple suitable and available options for protective
measures, the Court will choose those that are the least intrusive on the witness's wellbeing.
These measures could include local protection measures, an assisted move or various
security arrangements aimed at addressing the identified threat. Witness relocation is only
used as a last resort, due to the immense burden this puts on the witnesses and their families.
We are here before the ICC, because as the Leader of the UIE, I have been BANNED from bringing
matters before USA/US Courts. Thus, being deprived of protected Rights, Privileges, and Immunities
afforded me under the laws of the USA! With that being said, as a Native (a Descendant of individuals
ALREADY inhabiting and occupying the Lands/Territories during the time that Europeans CLAIM
Christopher Columbus’ “DISCOVERY”) …
35. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 33 of 95
who just happened to be born abroad (in Germany) and in 1972 was provided with a nice “Certificate of
Citizenship,” we are moving forward on and are using said credentials to present our matters before the
ICC as we “DENOUNCE” the USA/US’ War Crimes… and seek to RETRIEVE our Lands/Territories
(i.e. challenging/enforcing Treaties), Nationality, Culture, Heritage, Traditions, etc. that have been
STOLEN!
On or about September 7, 2018, the Utica INTERNATIONAL Embassy moved forward in
NOTIFYING of the August 28, 2018, KIDNAPPING and other War Crimes against me as its Interim Prime
Minister!
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/090718-notice-of-the-august-28-2018-kidnapping-request-for-
icc-reference-number
36. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 34 of 95
About 09/11/18 (approximately TWO days later), the USA/US Officials began to PUBLICLY
ANNOUNCE their THREATS against the ICC Judges if they pursue PROSECUTION of Americans for
WAR Crimes in Afghanistan…
https://www.france24.com/en/20180910-usa-trump-threatens-arrest-icc-judges-american-soldiers-afghan-
war-crimes
https://www.dw.com/en/us-threatens-to-arrest-icc-judges-over-war-crimes-probe/a-45435900
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2018/09/11/world/politics-diplomacy-world/u-s-threatens-arrest-icc-
judges-probe-americans-alleged-war-crimes-afghanistan/
37. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 35 of 95
Said notification is important in that it set off a CHAIN OF HISTORICAL EVENTS exposing the
USA/US Officials’ RETALIATION and issuance of THREATS against the International Criminal Court
Officials/Judges/Prosecutors, etc. “AFTER” learning of our Lawfully UTILIZING International Laws
and/or Tribunals to handle Investigations and Prosecution rather than rely on Baker Donelson’s and their
Nazis/Zionists’ JUDICIAL System!
https://www.npr.org/2018/09/11/646591434/u-s-will-retaliate-if-icc-tries-to-prosecute-americans-bolton-says
As of 10/17/19:
https://www.rferl.org/a/explainer-why-does-u-s-have-it-out-for-international-criminal-court-
/29484529.html
38. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 36 of 95
Let me be very clear! We (the Utica International Embassy as well as the Moorish Science Temple
of America for the Asiatic Nation of North America) are here to ENFORCE the Laws and will NOT allow
the USA’s DESPOTISM Government Regime’s Officials and the Nazis/Zionists that CONTROL and RUN
said DESPOT to “ENSLAVE” our Nations/Governments and their Leaders/Citizens and continue to hold
them “HOSTAGE” and as “SLAVES!” Our Leaders as myself (of the UIE) and the Honorable Drew Ali
(of the MSTOA-ANOFNA) have taken the LAWFUL and NECESSARY steps to secure our FREEDOMS
from such CRIMINAL Empires as the USA/US and their WAR Crimes… Enforcers!
We take the THREATS of the USA/US Officials against the ICC, its Judges/Officials/Prosecutors
very seriously and “DENOUNCE” the furtherance of such WAR Crimes…. Practices that are done for
purposes such as follows:
OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE
INTIMIDATION
HARASSMENT
THREATS
COERCION
BLACKMAIL, etc.
Furthermore, we are ASSERTING International Laws/Statutes (as the Rome Statute) and other governing
Laws to support that the USA/US, its Officials/Employees/Lawyers, etc. are NOT immune from! For
instance, the Rome Statute states in part:
Section 1.01 Article 54 - Duties and Powers of the Prosecutor With Respect To Investigations
1. The Prosecutor shall:
a. In order to establish the truth, extend the investigation to cover all facts and evidence
relevant to an assessment of whether there is criminal responsibility under this
Statute, and, in doing so, investigate incriminating and exonerating circumstances
equally;
b. Take appropriate measures to ensure the effective investigation and prosecution of
crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court, and in doing so, respect the interests and
personal circumstances of victims and witnesses, including … health, and take into
account the nature of the crime…; and
c. Fully respect the rights of persons arising under this Statute.
2. The Prosecutor may conduct investigations on the territory of a State:
a. In accordance with the provisions of Part 9; or
b. As authorized by the Pre-Trial Chamber under article 57, paragraph 3 (d).
Authorize the Prosecutor to take specific investigative steps
within the territory of a State Party without having secured
the cooperation of that State under Part 9 if, whenever
possible having regard to the views of the State concerned, the
Pre-Trial Chamber has determined in that case that the State
is clearly unable to execute a request for cooperation due to
the unavailability of any authority or any component of its
judicial system competent to execute the request for
cooperation under Part 9; - - - Article 57 Paragraph 3(d)
3. The Prosecutor may:
a. Collect and examine evidence;
b. Request the presence of and question persons being investigated, victims and
witnesses;
c. Seek the cooperation of any State or intergovernmental organization or arrangement
in accordance with its respective competence and/or mandate;
39. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 37 of 95
d. Enter into such arrangements or agreements, not inconsistent with this Statute, as
may be necessary to facilitate the cooperation of a State, intergovernmental
organization or person;
e. Agree not to disclose, at any stage of the proceedings, documents or information that
the Prosecutor obtains on the condition of confidentiality and solely for the purpose
of generating new evidence, unless the provider of the information consents; and
f. Take necessary measures, or request that necessary measures be taken, to ensure the
confidentiality of information, the protection of any person or the preservation of
evidence.
As of 10/17/19: https://www.icc-cpi.int/resourcelibrary/official-journal/rome-
statute.aspx#article54
In my recent Kidnapping and the attempts made on my life to have me Murdered, the USA’s Legal
Counsel Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz used one of their State Agencies (State of
Mississippi) to bring legal matters against me in the Hinds County (Mississippi) Chancery Court located in
Jackson, Mississippi. Having knowledge that they would NOT be able to defeat me in a Courtroom,
“ALL” access to Legal Resources were DENIED me; nevertheless, “shackled in chains – i.e. wrist and
ankles” they set the stage for one of the most HISTORICAL defeats in the USA/US Records and we are
here to move forward and seek the applicable Restitution and Relief afforded to us under National and
International Laws from Individuals and/or Officials employed and acting on behalf of the United States of
America, State of Mississippi, Hinds County Mississippi, Town of Utica Mississippi, etc. that were
recruited to carry out such hideous atrocities on me as well as my Mother Pearl Leo Torrey/Torry
Newsome! As you may know, when Kidnapped and taken HOSTAGE, it is about Survival and making
the right decisions when under duress, being subjected to daily torture techniques, threats to life, etc. so
that one lives to share the TESTIMONIES of such horrific atrocities… and bring the Criminals to
JUSTICE!
18 U.S. Code § 2441 - War crimes
(a) Offense.
Whoever, whether inside or outside the United States, commits a war crime, in any of the
circumstances described in subsection (b), shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for life or
any term of years, or both, and if death results to the victim, shall also be subject to the penalty of
death.
(b) Circumstances.
The circumstances referred to in subsection (a) are that the person committing such war crime or
the victim of such war crime is a member of the Armed Forces of the United States or a national
of the United States (as defined in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act).
40. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 38 of 95
(c) Definition. As used in this section the term “war crime” means any conduct:
(1) defined as a grave breach in any of the international conventions signed at Geneva
12 August 1949, or any protocol to such convention to which the United States is a
party;
(2) prohibited by Article 23, 25, 27, or 28 of the Annex to the Hague Convention IV,
Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land, signed 18 October 1907;
(3) which constitutes a grave breach of common Article 3 (as defined in subsection (d))
when committed in the context of and in association with an armed conflict not of an
international character; or . . .
(d) Common Article 3 Violations.
(1) Prohibited conduct. In subsection (c)(3), the term “grave breach of common Article
3” means any conduct (such conduct constituting a grave breach of common Article
3 of the international conventions done at Geneva August 12, 1949), as follows:
(A) Torture.
The act of a person who commits, or conspires or attempts to
commit, an act specifically intended to inflict severe physical or
mental pain or suffering (other than pain or suffering incidental to
lawful sanctions) upon another person within his custody or
physical control for the purpose of obtaining information or a
confession, punishment, intimidation, coercion, or any reason
based on discrimination of any kind.
(B) Cruel or inhuman treatment.
The act of a person who commits, or conspires or attempts to
commit, an act intended to inflict severe or serious physical or
mental pain or suffering (other than pain or suffering incidental to
lawful sanctions), including serious physical abuse, upon another
within his custody or control.
41. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 39 of 95
(C) Performing biological experiments.
The act of a person who subjects, or conspires or attempts to
subject, one or more persons within his custody or physical control
to biological experiments without a legitimate medical or dental
purpose and in so doing endangers the body or health of such
person or persons.
USA’S SECRET KILL LIST:
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/obama-secret-kill-list-13166139
(D) Murder.
The act of a person who intentionally kills, or conspires or
attempts to kill, or kills whether intentionally or unintentionally in
the course of committing any other offense under this subsection,
one or more persons taking no active part in the hostilities,
including those placed out of combat by sickness, wounds,
detention, or any other cause.
42. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 40 of 95
(E) Mutilation or maiming.
The act of a person who intentionally injures, or conspires or attempts to
injure, or injures whether intentionally or unintentionally in the course of
committing any other offense under this subsection, one or more persons
taking no active part in the hostilities, including those placed out of combat
by sickness, wounds, detention, or any other cause, by disfiguring the person
or persons by any mutilation thereof or by permanently disabling any
member, limb, or organ of his body, without any legitimate medical or dental
purpose.
(F) Intentionally causing serious bodily injury.
The act of a person who intentionally causes, or conspires or
attempts to cause, serious bodily injury to one or more persons,
including lawful combatants, in violation of the law of war.
(G) Rape.
The act of a person who forcibly or with coercion or threat of force
wrongfully invades, or conspires or attempts to invade, the body of a person
by penetrating, however slightly, the anal or genital opening of the victim
with any part of the body of the accused, or with any foreign object.
As of 10/17/19:
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/032519-usas-kidnappingof-interim-prime-minister-vogel-denise-
newsome
(H) Sexual assault or abuse.
The act of a person who forcibly or with coercion or threat of
force engages, or conspires or attempts to engage, in sexual
contact with one or more persons, or causes, or conspires or
attempts to cause, one or more persons to engage in sexual contact.
43. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 41 of 95
(I) Taking hostages.
The act of a person who, having knowingly seized or
detained one or more persons, threatens to kill, injure, or continue
to detain such person or persons with the intent of compelling any
nation, person other than the hostage, or group of persons to act or
refrain from acting as an explicit or implicit condition for the
safety or release of such person or persons.
IMPORTANT TO NOTE: The August 28, 2018, THREATS issued by the Town of Utica,
Mississippi’s Police Chief Timothy Myles THREATENING me advising, “We got something for you…”
constitutes CONSPIRACY(S) and “They’re going to do it right this time…” and INTENT to make
GOOD on such THREATS on my Life, Freedoms, Safety, Wellbeing, Peace, Security, etc. and are
indeed THREATS that were acted upon AGAIN on March 25, 2019, when I was KIDNAPPED,
FALSELY Imprisoned… and subjected to WAR Crimes and other Criminal Acts!
18 U.S. Code § 1513 - Retaliating Against A Witness, Victim…
(a)
(1) Whoever kills or attempts to kill another person with intent to retaliate
against any person for—
(A) the attendance of a witness or party at an official proceeding, or any testimony
given or any record, document, or other object produced by a witness in an
official proceeding; or . . .
shall be punished as provided in paragraph (2).
44. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 42 of 95
(2) The punishment for an offense under this subsection is—
(A) in the case of a killing, the punishment . . .; and
(B) in the case of an attempt, imprisonment for not more than 30 years….
(e) Whoever knowingly, with the intent to retaliate, takes any action harmful to
any person, including interference with the lawful employment or livelihood of
any person, for providing to a law enforcement officer any truthful information
relating to the commission or possible commission of any Federal offense, shall be
fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/notice-of-eeoc-complaint-against-1-st-heritage-
credit-llc-filed
IMPORTANT TO NOTE: That the USA/US’ DESPOTISM Government Empire’s
Nazis/Zionists have gone as far as allowing their Legal Counsel Baker Donelson, their CO-Conspirators
and others with whom they conspired to further engage in WAR Crimes… and other Criminal Acts and
have me BLACKLISTED and BANNED from employment! Unlawful practices which are also deemed
to be WAR Crimes… Criminal Acts!
45. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 43 of 95
There is sufficient evidence to support:
EXCEPTIONAL Skillset to perform the duties assigned me by Employers:
In another case (Lagies v. Copley, 110 Cal App 3d 958, 16 Cal Rptr 368),
the plaintiff, . . .alleged that officials and managerial employees of his
corporate employer abused their positions of authority over him by
conduct including demotions, discriminatory treatment, denial of long-
accepted avenues of advancement, and defamation of his reputation to
his coworkers, . . . and to the public generally, apparently in retaliation
for a story which offended the chairperson of the board. The complaint
further charged that the individual defendants conspired to get plaintiff
to quit, tarnish his reputation, and blackball him by preventing his being
hired . . .; that they published his confidential sources thus destroying his
credibility . . .; that they virtually isolated plaintiff in his place of
employment rendering him a de facto pariah, . . ., assigning him to more
and more degrading tasks . . .. Reversing a dismissal of the complaint,
the court held the plaintiff alleged facts and circumstances which
reasonably could lead trier of fact to conclude that defendants’ conduct
was extreme and outrageous. The court noted that according to the
pleadings, defendants intentionally humiliated plaintiff, . . . singled him
out for denial of merit raises, . . ., blackballed him, thus precluding other
employment, . . . thus destroying his credibility . . ., all without just cause
or provocation. The court concluded that the pleadings charged more
than insult and more than mere direction of job activities.
Hundley v. Louisville & N.R. Co., 48 S.W. 429 (Ky.) - A conspiracy
between defendant railroad company and other . . .companies to prevent
discharged employees from obtaining employment, if unlawful, does
not give an employee who has been discharged by defendant a right of
action, unless the conspiracy has been carried out by the refusal to
give him employment. . .
46. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 44 of 95
. . .that while engaged in the discharge of his duties he was
wrongfully, unlawfully, and maliciously discharged by it; that it
wrongfully, unlawfully, and maliciously blacklisted him; that he was
blacklisted wrongfully, unlawfully, maliciously, and falsely by its placing
upon its records a pretended cause of discharge, to wit, neglect of duty,
with a view of injuring and preventing him from entering its
employment or that of other . . .companies; that it had entered into a
conspiracy and combination with other . . .companies by which its
employés discharged for cause will not be given employment by other. .
. companies; that, on account of its false and malicious acts and its
conspiracy with other . . .companies, he has been deprived of the right
to again engage in the employment of the defendant or other . . .
companies; that the wrongful acts mentioned were committed for the
purpose of making, and had made, it impossible for him to ever again
get employment from the defendant on any of its lines, or from other . .
.companies in the United States; . . .
It is the part of every man's civil rights to enter into any lawful
business, and to assume business relations with any person who is capable
of making a contract. It is likewise a part of such rights to refuse to enter
into business relations, whether such refusal be the result of reason, or of
whim, caprice, prejudice, or malice. If he is wrongfully deprived of
these rights, he is entitled to redress. Every person sui juris is entitled
to pursue any lawful trade, occupation, or calling. It is part of his civil
rights to do so. He is as much entitled to pursue his trade, occupation, or
calling, and be protected in it, as is the citizen in his life, liberty, and
property. Whoever wrongfully prevents him from doing so inflicts an
actionable injury. For every injury suffered by reason of a violent or
malicious act done to a man's occupation, profession, or way of
getting a livelihood, an action lies. Such an act is an invasion of legal
rights. A man's trade, occupation, or profession may be injured to
such an extent, by reason of a violent or malicious act, as would
prevent him from making a livelihood. One who has followed a certain
trade or calling for years may be almost unfitted for any other business.
To deprive him of his trade or calling is to condemn, not only him, but
perchance a wife and children, to penury and want. Public interests,
humanity, and individual rights, alike, demand the redress of a
wrong which is followed by such lamentable consequences. A . .
company has the right to engage in its service whomsoever it pleases, and,
as part of its right to conduct its business, is the right to discharge any one
from its service, unless to do so would be in violation of contractual
relations with the employé. It is the duty of a . . .company to keep in its
service persons who are capable of discharging their important duties in
a careful and skillful manner. The public interest, as well as the vast
property interests of the company, require that none other should be
employed by it. Its duty in this regard and its right to discharge an
employé does not imply the right to be guilty of a violent or malicious
act, which results in the injury of the discharged employé's calling.
The company has the right to keep a record of the causes for which it
discharges an employé, but in the exercise of this right the duty is
imposed to make a truthful statement of the cause of the discharge.
If, by an arrangement among the . . .companies of the country, a record is
to be kept by them of the causes of the discharge of their employés, and
when they are discharged for certain causes the others will not employ
them, it becomes important that the record kept should contain a true
statement of the cause of an employé's discharge. A false entry on the
record may utterly destroy and prevent him from making a
livelihood at his chosen business. Such false entry must be regarded
as intended to injure the discharged employé; therefore a malicious
act. . . .“A tort may be dependent upon, or independent of, contract. If a
contract imposes a legal duty upon a person, the neglect of that duty is a
tort founded on contract; so that an action ex contractu for the breach of
contract, or an action ex delicto for the breach of duty, may be
brought, at the option of the plaintiff.” It was one of the purposes of
the common law to protect every person against the wrongful acts of
every other person, and it did not matter whether they were
47. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 45 of 95
committed by one person or by a combination of persons, and under
it an action was maintainable for injuries done by disturbing a person
in the enjoyment of any right or privilege which he had. It is said in
Cooley, Torts, 278: “Thus, if one is prevented, by the wrongful act of
a third party, from securing some employment he has sought, he
suffers a legal wrong, provided he can show that the failure to employ
him was the direct and natural consequences of the wrongful act.” It
is said in 1 Add. Torts, 14: “When a violent or malicious act is done to
a man's occupation, profession, or way of getting a livelihood, there
an action lies in all cases.” The plaintiff does not seek to recover because
he was discharged in violation of a contract which he had with the
defendant. He does not allege that he had a contract with it to perform
services for it for a given length of time. He seeks to recover damages
for its alleged wrongful act in making the false entry upon its record
against him, to prevent him from pursuing his calling by rendering it
impossible for him to get employment from other . . .companies. . .
The liability is damages for doing, not for conspiracy. The charge
of conspiracy does not change the nature of the act. In an action for
damages, there must be some overt act, consequent upon the
agreement to do a wrong, to give the plaintiff a standing in a court of
law. Jag. Torts, 638; Cooley, Torts, 279
as well as GOOD work ethics:
As of 10/17/19: https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/051212-complaint-exhibits-pkh-final
As of 10/17/19: https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/120310-complaint-mmsexhibits
48. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 46 of 95
The information found in this document is further EVIDENCE of the USA’s Department of Labor’s
DISCRIMINATORY and BIAS towards me in the handling of their Investigations; moreover, that the
Charges/Complaints upon which the following Settlements were reached were made on LESS Threshold
Requirements and Evidence (if any) than that presented in my Equal Employment Opportunity Complaints!
As of 10/17/19:
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/dol-whd-mississippi-actions-news-releaseofsettlements
Website as of 10/17/19:
http://www.dol.gov/whd/media/press/Southeast/default.asp
We are confident that the USA/US’ DESPOTISM Government’s Nazis/Zionists will NOT be able
to JUSTIFY their actions! Moreover, lawfully rebut our moving forward in the execution and
implementation of our “OWN” Nations/Governments as permitted under National and International Laws
governing said matters!
There is record evidence that Baker Donelson’s Lawyers/Attorneys have abused their POWERS
in holding positions as “DIRECTOR” of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts and have attempted
to “LABEL” me a “Serial Litigator” when I am not! Going as far as to DEPRIVE me “JURY Trials”
because the USA/US DESPOTISM Government Officials and their Nazis/Zionists do NOT see me nor the
Citizens of the UIE as well as the MSTOA-ANOFNA as Citizens but ONLY as “SLAVES” and or
“BLACKS” under their “BLACK Code/JIM Crow Laws,” etc. without Rights, Privileges, Immunity,
Sovereign Protection, etc.
49. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 47 of 95
As of 10/17/19: https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/united-states-abuse-of-the-serial-litigator-
defense
Baker Donelson going as far as using its position as Legal Counsel for the United States of America:
to also place one of their Lawyers/Attorneys (James C. Duff) in the TOP/KEY position as Director of the
Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts that oversee and control Court proceedings in the USA/US.
Placing Duff in this position to act as a GATEKEEPER in their ANTI-Vogel Denise Newsome System!
A system put into place to obstruct “ALL” legal proceedings brought by me and “NOW” that of the UIE
and MSTOA-ANOFNA!
50. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 48 of 95
As of 10/17/19: https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/021407-complaint-sla-99
JAMES C. DUFF: Director of the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/duff-jameswikipediaresignhighlighted-copy
This instant photo provides information also regarding “HOW” Baker Donelson placed its
Attorneys/Lawyers into TOP/KEY positions prior to their Domestic Terrorist Attacks on September 11,
2001, on the World Trade Center Towers and other alleged targets! For instance placing Lee Rawls in as
Counsel/Chief of Staff for the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) – Robert Mueller.
So, at the time of the September 11, 2001, Domestic Terrorist Attacks, you have Baker Donelson
Lawyers/Attorneys as:
W. LEE RAWLS: Counsel/Chief of Staff to the Director Robert Mueller of the Federal
Bureau of Investigation who was placed in this position approximately SEVEN (7) Days
before Baker Donelson and CO-Conspirators carried out the Domestic Terrorist Attacks on
the World Trade Center Towers and other alleged Targets:
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/rawls-w-lee-baker-donelsonemployeesenior-
counsel-to-fbi
51. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 49 of 95
DAVID SPEARS ADDINGTON: Legal Counsel (2001-2005) and Chief of Staff (2005-
2009) to U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney (David Spears Addington) – Assistant General
Counsel for the Central Intelligence Agency – Special Assistant to Legislative Affairs –
Deputy Assistant to U.S. President Ronald Reagan – Special Assistant for the Secretary of
Defense – General Counsel for the Department of Defense – provided extensive assistance
to Dick Cheney when he was Chief Executive Officer for Halliburton (i.e. Emphasis – Info
crucial to the failed U.S. Mission to invade Venezuela where Halliburton has an operation
located)
Understanding Role in AFGHANISTAN Matter:
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/092812-david-
addington-article-english
Wikipedia Information:
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/david-addington-
wikipedia-baker-donelson-weapon
Further supporting “WHY” we here at the UIE and MSTOA-ANOFNA are now able to bring our
matters before the International Criminal Court and/or Foreign Tribunals for relief!
As of 10/17/19: https://vimeo.com/317716020
BAKER DONELSON TAMPERING & COACHING
BAKER DONELSON WITNESS DAVID ADDINGTON
IN TORTURE…HEARINGS
52. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 50 of 95
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/ex-34-091704-petition-seekingintervention-entergymatter
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/092304-request-interventiondoj-mms-flsa-matter
53. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 51 of 95
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/062606-fbi-complaint-mississippi-matter
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/101308-fbi-complaint-gmm-properties
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/122809-fbi-complaint-ohio-supreme-court
54. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 52 of 95
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/092409-fbi-complaint-storall
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/060910-fbi-complaint-public-storage
55. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 53 of 95
https://www.slideshare.net/VogelDenise/063015-fbi-criminal-complaintanna-louise-inn-final
THE KIDNAPPING OF
MICHAEL ANTHONY MILLER-EL/MICHAEL MILLER-EL
B. DEMAND FOR FREEDOM OF “HOSTAGE” MICHAEL ANTHONY MILLER-EL – A/K/A BY THE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA/UNITED STATES’ DESPOTISM GOVERNMENT EMPIRE AS MICHAEL
ANTHONY MILLER
CUYAHOGA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS (OHIO) – CRIMINAL CASE NO. 641058
56. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 54 of 95
We are making it VERY CLEAR that the FEDERAL Laws of the United States of America
PROHIBITS the Obstruction of Justice/Obstruction of Administration of Justice – i.e. TAMPERING
WITH WITNESSES… as with issuing a FRIVOLOUS “WARRANT: Fugitive With A Felony
Arrest…” alleging:
1) Intimidation of an Officer
2) Retaliation
3) Telecommunication Harassment
MAY BE DEEMED:
TAMPERING WITH A WITNESS/VICTIM
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C § 1512
AND/OR THE APPLICABLE STATUTES/LAWS GOVERNING SAID MATTER(S)
(a)
(1) Whoever kills or attempts to kill another person, with
intent to—
(A) prevent the attendance or testimony of any person in
an official proceeding;
(B) prevent the production of a record, document, or
other object, in an official proceeding; or . . .
shall be punished as provided in paragraph (3).
57. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 55 of 95
(2) Whoever uses physical force or the threat of physical
force against any person, or attempts to do so, with intent
to—
(A) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of
any person in an official proceeding;
(B) cause or induce any person to—
(i) withhold testimony, or withhold a record,
document, or other object, from an official
proceeding;
(ii) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object
with intent to impair the integrity or
availability of the object for use in an official
proceeding; . . .
(iii) evade legal process summoning that person
to appear as a witness, or to produce a record,
document, or other object, in an official
proceeding; or
(iv) be absent from an official proceeding to
which that person has been summoned by
legal process; . . .
shall be punished as provided in paragraph
(3).
(3) The punishment for an offense under this subsection is—
(A) in the case of a killing, the punishment provided . . .;
(B) in the case of—
(i) an attempt to murder; or
(ii) the use or attempted use of physical force
against any person;
imprisonment for not more than 30 years;
and
(C) in the case of the threat of use of physical force
against any person, imprisonment for not more than
20 years.
(b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly
persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in
misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to—
(1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in
an official proceeding;
(2) cause or induce any person to—
(A) withhold testimony, or withhold a record,
document, or other object, from an official
proceeding;
(B) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with
intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability
for use in an official proceeding; . . .
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years,
or both.
58. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 56 of 95
(a) Whoever corruptly—
(1) alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals a record, document,
or other object, or attempts to do so, with the intent to impair
the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official
proceeding; or
(2) otherwise obstructs, influences, or impedes any official
proceeding, or attempts to do so,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20
years, or both.
(d) Whoever intentionally harasses another person and thereby
hinders, delays, prevents, or dissuades any person from—
(1) attending or testifying in an official proceeding; . . .
(2) arresting or seeking the arrest of another person in
connection with a Federal offense; or
(3) causing a criminal prosecution, or a parole or probation
revocation proceeding, to be sought or instituted, or
assisting in such prosecution or proceeding;
or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not
more than 3 years, or both.
(e) In a prosecution for an offense under this section, it is an affirmative
defense, as to which the defendant has the burden of proof by a
preponderance of the evidence, that the conduct consisted solely of
lawful conduct and that the defendant’s sole intention was to
encourage, induce, or cause the other person to testify truthfully.
(f) For the purposes of this section—
(1) an official proceeding need not be pending or about to be
instituted at the time of the offense; and
(2) the testimony, or the record, document, or other object need
not be admissible in evidence or free of a claim of privilege.
(g) In a prosecution for an offense under this section, no state of mind
need be proved with respect to the circumstance—
(1) that the official proceeding before a judge, court,
magistrate judge, grand jury, or government agency is before
a judge or court of the United States, a United States
magistrate judge, a bankruptcy judge, a Federal grand jury,
or a Federal Government agency; or . . .
(h) There is extraterritorial Federal jurisdiction over an offense under
this section.
(i) A prosecution under this section or section 1503 may be brought
in the district in which the official proceeding (whether or not
pending or about to be instituted) was intended to be affected or in
the district in which the conduct constituting the alleged offense
occurred.
(j) If the offense under this section occurs in connection with a trial
of a criminal case, the maximum term of imprisonment which may
be imposed for the offense shall be the higher of that otherwise
provided by law or the maximum term that could have been imposed
for any offense charged in such case.
59. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 57 of 95
(k) Whoever conspires to commit any offense under this section shall
be subject to the same penalties as those prescribed for the
offense the commission of which was the object of the conspiracy.
With that being said, PLEASE BE ADVISED of our concerns that we believe that Michael-EL
has been KIDNAPPED with intent to have him MURDERED for purposes of TAMPERING with a
Witness/Victim and to Obstruct Justice/Obstruct the Administration of Justice. Moreover, we are reminded
that when the USA’s War Crimes… Enforcers (i.e. Chicago Police Department, etc.) KIDNAPPED the
Honorable Drew Ali – Prophet/Founder of a “NEW” Government under the Name of the Moorish Science
Temple of America – his DEATH/MURDER (at the early age of 43) occurred SHORTLY after his release
from the CHICAGO POLICE!
Furthermore, I have only been provided with EXCERPTS of a few COURT documents that Michael Miller-
EL had submitted for filing IN (it appears) Cleveland, Ohio. IF this is true, then I am disturbed by the
RECENT Criminal Acts being carried out AGAINST him for purposes of TAMPERING WITH A
WITNESS, OBSTRUCTING a Court Action and/or Obstructing the Administration of Justice! Moreover,
RETALIATORY Acts against a Party and/or Witness (Michael-EL) by the United States of America’s
Officials and/or its STATE Corporate Empire’s Officials (i.e. in Virginia and Ohio, etc.) which ARE
PROHIBITED under National and INTERNATIONAL Laws, etc.
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE/OBSTRUCTION OF
ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C § 1503, 1505, 1512
AND/OR THE APPLICABLE STATUTES/LAWS GOVERNING SAID MATTER(S)
ORC §2921.04
INTIMIDATION OF … VICTIM OR WITNESS IN
CRIMINAL CASE…PROCEEDING
(A) No person shall knowingly attempt to intimidate or hinder the victim of a crime or
delinquent act in the filing or prosecution of criminal charges… or proceeding, and no person
shall knowingly attempt to intimidate a witness to a criminal… act by reason of the person
being a witness to that act.
(B) No person, knowingly and by force or by unlawful threat of harm to any person or
property or by unlawful threat to commit any offense or calumny against any person,
shall attempt to influence, intimidate, or hinder any of the following persons:
(1) The victim of a crime… or prosecution of criminal… proceeding;
(2) A witness to a criminal or delinquent act by reason of the person being a
witness to that act;
(3) An attorney by reason of the attorney's involvement in any criminal or delinquent
child action or proceeding.
(D) Whoever violates this section is guilty of intimidation… victim, or witness in a
criminal case.… A violation of division (B) of this section is a felony of the third degree.
(E) As used in this section, "witness" means any person who has or claims to have
knowledge concerning a fact or facts concerning a criminal or delinquent act, whether or
not criminal or delinquent child charges are actually filed.
60. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 58 of 95
“LACK OF JURISDICTION CONCERNS:” The following is a snapshot of the “Affidavit of
Criminal Complaint” executed on the “10th
day of November, 2018.” The document also references being
mailed via “certified mail;” however, according to Docket Entries of the Court, it does NOT reflect receipt,
filing and/or return of document noting deficiency (if any) from the Sheriff, State Attorney General and
Court Clerk. It appears from the “Affidavit of Criminal Complaint” it provides TESTIMONY regarding
what Michael Miller El believes to be criminal acts and EVIDENCE to support his “duty” and
“obligation” to REPORT Crimes – i.e. which he reported to the Sheriff, State Attorney General and Court
Clerk! We believe from the documents reviewed, that there is sufficient evidence to support that the
Cuyahoga County Court, etc. “LACKS JURISDICTION!” Nevertheless, it appears, from the
KIDNAPPING of our Brother Michael Anthony Miller-EL, the STATE Courts of the United States of
America are USURPING Jurisdiction for which they LACK!
I have been provided information regarding
what appears to be an “Affidavit of Criminal
Complaint” executed by “Missionary Sheik:
Michael Miller El;” wherein, he references himself
as a Witness in “attempting to record certain
contract documents…” as well as Court Officials
(i.e. Clerk, Supervisor) refusing “to record certain
required contract evidence.” From said Affidavit,
it appears from the writing, etc. that Michael-EL
appears to be UNDER DURESS and notes
concerns of THREAT, MAIL FRAUD,
COERCION, etc. He further request
INVESTIGATION by the Sherriff’s Office and
State Attorney General! Thus, we are interested in
finding out the STATUS of Michael-EL’s requests
in that, it appears, that from the United States Postal
Service Tracking Information, said Affidavit was
served in September 2018, February 2019, and
April 2019.
From research, it appears that on or about
May 24, 2019, Sheriff Clifford Pinkney
“ABRUPTLY” announced RESIGNATION
and/or Retirement; which for us raise valid
concerns considering further research yields
information regarding the involvement of the
Federal Government as well as Pinkney’s Attorney
expressing concerns of potential Civil and Criminal
Investigations and Lawsuits!
61. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 59 of 95
REFUSING to answer dozens of questions: https://www.news5cleveland.com/news/local-
news/investigations/county-jail/sheriff-pinkney-refuses-to-answer-dozens-of-questions-about-county-jail-
during-council-meeting
Upon checking the “DOCKET Sheet” [which has been preserved] for the
Criminal Case No. CR19-637205A noted (i.e. for Nathaniel D. Taylor), there
is NO entry of the Affidavits submitted for filing by Michael Miller-EL!
Furthermore, we have valid concerns regarding what is being seen and NOT
being seen in the Docket Entries of the Cuyahoga County Clerk of Courts in
such matters brought to our attention!
62. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 60 of 95
It appears according to the “DOCKET Sheet” for Michael Miller-EL,
the “Date of Offense” is being shown as “04/25/19!” - - - KEEP IN MIND
Pinkney’s ABRUPT announcement regarding resignation/retirement about May
24, 2019!
However, a CONFLICT exist between the alleged “Date of Offense 04/25/19” and the “A True Bill
Indictment…” for “Count One Intimidation – F3 §2921.03(A)” dates alleged as, “Dates of Offense (on
or about) 02/19/2019 to 06/10/2019!” FILED on June 20, 2019!
A CONFLICT also exist between the alleged “Date of Offense 04/25/19” and the “A True Bill
Indictment…” for “Count Two Retaliation – F3 §2921.05(A)” dates alleged as, “Dates of Offense (on
or about) 02/19/2019 to 06/10/2019!” FILED on June 20, 2019!
63. 17 USC § 107 Limitations on Exclusive Rights – FAIR USE Page 61 of 95
However, a CONFLICT exist between the alleged “Date of Offense 04/25/19” and the “A True Bill
Indictment…” for “Count Three Intimidation – F3 §2917.21(A)(6)” dates alleged as, “Dates of Offense
(on or about) 02/19/2019 to 06/10/2019!”
Not ONLY is the “LACK OF JURISDICTION” a concern of ours, we
believe the “UNLAWFUL” handling of each matter and document is enough to
warrant our CONCERNS and demand RESOLUTION through obtaining
Michael Miller-EL’s IMMEDIATE RELEASE/FREEDOM! In this instant
Correspondence, we provide SNAPSHOTS of some of Michael Miller-EL’s
work to SUPPORT that HE INITIATED and/or IS ENGAGED in what he
believes to be LAWFUL and/or LEGAL proceedings in the Court(s) within the
Lands/Territories of the United States of America – i.e. Roanoke, Virginia and
Cuyahoga County, Ohio! Michael-EL appears to have DRAFTED and
submitted FOR RECORDING/FILING, documents to the Court(s) Officials, etc.
that ARE WITHIN the Jurisdiction of the United States of America, etc.