SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 10
Problem : Productivity
Department : Outbound – Picking
Area identified for trailing : 4 tire area – A Zone
Suggestion :
Want to solve the problem by using method of - DMAIC - PDCA
STEPS
DEFINE Identified the problem – Productivity.
Unable to get productivity target (Outbound Sales) – 200 Line
with in 8 Hrs. Achieving Average 145 with in 8 Hrs.
MESSURE Identify the gap between current and required performance.
Gap to be achieved – min 25% more than existing .
Collected existing Daily productivity report
ANALYSE Listed out prioritize potential causes of the problem.
Usually sales team will have 3 members. Now we want picker
to be merged with Binning Team. Picker will do only picking.
IMPROVE Created simplest and easiest plan.
Test solutions using Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle method.
CONTROL Formatted new format for future to sustain the improvement
efficiency.
DMAIC – STEPS
PLAN Identified the
problem
WHAT
WHO
WHERE
Productivity
As a tem
Sales
For trail purpose
identified A
zone and team
Collected data
on zone ,Layout
pick type
material size
and team
members &
training
Information on
implementation shared with
respective team and
explained the purpose.
DO Segregated
data's –
On valid point
wise.
Made a new
process and
framed new format
New Process
1.Team has to
be split.
2.Timing of
picking and
packing has to
be registered.
Given training
on new
implementation
to respective
team.
Explained the
team with data
where we have
failed and due
to why. Started trailing
CHECK Measurement
on trailing
registered.
Picker started to
work
independently.
Picking start time
and end time
register happening.
Monitored on
performance
and validate
training
effectiveness.
Monitored on
Data entry on
new format.
Collected data
and suggestion
on trailing from
picker team.
Analyzing the data
registered against on trail.
ACT Reviewed
feedback.
Planned to start 2nd
phase trail.
Old Format
Date Line Challan Qty Val
New Format
Date Line Challan Qty Val
Start
Time
Close
Time
Diff
Picking – Productivity
Team capacity – 03
Team with (Outbound) – 03
Team – 02
Packer - 1
Helper - 1
Picker - 1
Present practice Suggested
Packer & Helper
Picker will be merged
with Binning Team (Inbound)
Target – 200 Lines – 8 Hrs
Achieving – 140 Lines (Avg) – 8 Hrs
Current status
Timing Not Maintaining
Manpower 3
Productivity Achieving less than 80%
Claim Unable to monitor & Control
Accuracy – Location
Inventory
Unable to control
Draw back: In current practice
Current practice
Suggested
Productivity Not Maintaining Going to Maintain
Manpower 3 2+ 1
Claim Rare Controlling Can control 95%
Location Accuracy Unable to Control Can control 95%
Inventory Accuracy Unable to Control Can control 95%
Productivity Giving 85% to 90%
Can achieve more than
100% Rare case only
will come down to 80% 90%
due to huge Qty
Benefits : After change
Old Practice (3 person a team) – Team performance report
Date Line Chl Qty Val
16.04.2014 152 32 1678 7.17
21.04.2014 150 24 1456 8.89
22.04.2014 112 16 1555 5.63
23.04.2014 115 17 598 3.86
24.04.2014 170 25 1136 10.76
25.04.2014 184 27 1369 7.03
26.04.2014 171 41 1543 13.04
30.04.2014 169 39 1900 13.2
Total 1223 221 11235 69.58
Date Line Chl Qty Val
15.04.2014 50 10 973 4.56
16.04.2014 144 23 1877 13.31
18.04.2014 167 31 1994 10.69
21.04.2014 162 21 1818 11.92
30.04.2014 104 21 698 3.78
Total 627 106 7360 44.26
AVG : 156
AVG : 125
Packer Name : Mr. Manju Packer Name : Mr. Harish
Date CH Line Qty Value
Time
taken
Tkt Diff
5/5 16 197 1426 876409.02 6:27 200 3
5/6 26 218 1853 1000759.03 4:36 200 -18
5/7 23 211 1248 640487.61 4:51 200 -11
5/8 22 161 2592 925217.71 5:39 200 39
5/9 12 131 2087 1606866.34 5:10 200 69
5/10 28 134 2041 1323214.1 6:42 200 66
5/12 23 156 3366 1042307.81 5:35 200 44
5/13 34 209 1764 926398.53 4:31 200 -9
5/14 34 203 1695 1192973.18 4:58 200 -3
Date CH Line Qty Value
Time
taken
Tkt Diff
5/5 19 189 1113 515109.81 4:09 200 11
5/6 29 180 1488 758204.29 4:32 200 20
5/7 26 197 1078 786213.86 3:19 200 3
5/8 26 172 3809 1215997.17 6:42 200 28
5/9 13 167 1845 883376.79 5:40 200 33
5/10 22 114 693 528700.31 3:19 200 86
5/12 29 204 1147 616593.24 6:40 200 -4
5/13 31 202 1271 844067.25 5:37 200 -2
5/14 38 234 2728 1157857.23 6:38 200 -34
Date CHLine Qty Value
Time
taken
Tkt Diff
5/6 31 193 1144 680389.26 5:07 200 7
5/7 31 203 1008 682592.44 4:13 200 -3
5/8 23 160 3465 1400349.79 5:23 200 40
5/10 27 207 1094 688901.07 5:25 200 -7
5/12 34 189 1473 894294.49 4:40 200 11
5/13 30 204 1595 1011110.76 5:40 200 -4
5/14 31 215 2049 1418591.98 6:33 200 -15
5/15 33 245 1973 987764.24 6:57 250 5
AVG : 184
AVG : 180
AVG : 196
Picker Name : Mr. Chandrasekar
Trail proof
Result :
Based on analyses average picking time for one manpower is 5.5Hrs.
In this 5.5 Hrs Average productivity line is 185.
Claim has been reduced by 70% due to this implementation.
S. No Improvement Old New %
1 Productivity 145 185 20
2 Claim 10 3 70

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Bien doi khi hau50
Bien doi khi hau50Bien doi khi hau50
Bien doi khi hau50Phi Phi
 
Curso de Adobe Page Maker 2015
Curso de Adobe Page Maker 2015Curso de Adobe Page Maker 2015
Curso de Adobe Page Maker 2015Filiphe Amorim
 
Its time to rethink everything a governance risk compliance primer
Its time to rethink everything a governance risk compliance primerIts time to rethink everything a governance risk compliance primer
Its time to rethink everything a governance risk compliance primerEnclaveSecurity
 
Apresentação plano de negocio
Apresentação plano de negocioApresentação plano de negocio
Apresentação plano de negocioMarcos Rahmeier
 
Supply Chain Management Basics: Inventory Picking Strategies
Supply Chain Management Basics: Inventory Picking StrategiesSupply Chain Management Basics: Inventory Picking Strategies
Supply Chain Management Basics: Inventory Picking StrategiesAngela Carver
 
Transavia charles verstegen
Transavia charles verstegenTransavia charles verstegen
Transavia charles verstegenBigDataExpo
 

Viewers also liked (11)

Bien doi khi hau50
Bien doi khi hau50Bien doi khi hau50
Bien doi khi hau50
 
Fotografia schlieren
Fotografia schlierenFotografia schlieren
Fotografia schlieren
 
Curso de Adobe Page Maker 2015
Curso de Adobe Page Maker 2015Curso de Adobe Page Maker 2015
Curso de Adobe Page Maker 2015
 
Marles | Alto-Verão 2017 - MALHARIA
Marles | Alto-Verão 2017 - MALHARIAMarles | Alto-Verão 2017 - MALHARIA
Marles | Alto-Verão 2017 - MALHARIA
 
Darwin e Rjlander
Darwin e RjlanderDarwin e Rjlander
Darwin e Rjlander
 
Its time to rethink everything a governance risk compliance primer
Its time to rethink everything a governance risk compliance primerIts time to rethink everything a governance risk compliance primer
Its time to rethink everything a governance risk compliance primer
 
Orderpicking
OrderpickingOrderpicking
Orderpicking
 
Apresentação plano de negocio
Apresentação plano de negocioApresentação plano de negocio
Apresentação plano de negocio
 
Supply Chain Management Basics: Inventory Picking Strategies
Supply Chain Management Basics: Inventory Picking StrategiesSupply Chain Management Basics: Inventory Picking Strategies
Supply Chain Management Basics: Inventory Picking Strategies
 
Transavia charles verstegen
Transavia charles verstegenTransavia charles verstegen
Transavia charles verstegen
 
Luciana [Lumyx] Portfolio Moda 1
Luciana [Lumyx] Portfolio Moda 1Luciana [Lumyx] Portfolio Moda 1
Luciana [Lumyx] Portfolio Moda 1
 

Similar to Picking – Productivity - A location Kaizen 16

Factory Monthly KSM- AZMERI.ppt
Factory Monthly KSM- AZMERI.pptFactory Monthly KSM- AZMERI.ppt
Factory Monthly KSM- AZMERI.pptNittamallik216
 
Vsm and wip with arena simulation
Vsm and wip with  arena simulationVsm and wip with  arena simulation
Vsm and wip with arena simulationuniceder1111
 
R & R Accuracy - Location & Inventory Oct14 Kaizen 18
R & R Accuracy - Location & Inventory Oct14 Kaizen 18R & R Accuracy - Location & Inventory Oct14 Kaizen 18
R & R Accuracy - Location & Inventory Oct14 Kaizen 18Vasu devan.R
 
North East Zone- Guwahati Presentation
North East Zone- Guwahati PresentationNorth East Zone- Guwahati Presentation
North East Zone- Guwahati PresentationVipul Chaturvedi
 
How to Improve Your Bottom-Line Through Lean Six Sigma
How to Improve Your Bottom-Line Through Lean Six SigmaHow to Improve Your Bottom-Line Through Lean Six Sigma
How to Improve Your Bottom-Line Through Lean Six SigmaDrake International
 
Six Sigma Project Charter Attributa Data of Roshan Weeratunga
Six Sigma Project Charter Attributa Data of Roshan   WeeratungaSix Sigma Project Charter Attributa Data of Roshan   Weeratunga
Six Sigma Project Charter Attributa Data of Roshan WeeratungaRoshan Sujeewa Weeratunga
 
Case Quality Management—ToyotaQuality Control Analytics at Toyo.docx
Case Quality Management—ToyotaQuality Control Analytics at Toyo.docxCase Quality Management—ToyotaQuality Control Analytics at Toyo.docx
Case Quality Management—ToyotaQuality Control Analytics at Toyo.docxcowinhelen
 
OMP presentation
OMP presentationOMP presentation
OMP presentationbuhle keto
 
Scheduling by Primavera - Training
Scheduling by Primavera - TrainingScheduling by Primavera - Training
Scheduling by Primavera - TrainingMohammed Feroze
 
Activity-Based Costing
Activity-Based CostingActivity-Based Costing
Activity-Based Costingrexcris
 
Jared Amato - Six Sigma Green Belt Reporting
Jared Amato - Six Sigma Green Belt ReportingJared Amato - Six Sigma Green Belt Reporting
Jared Amato - Six Sigma Green Belt ReportingJared Amato
 
Load Test Like a Pro
Load Test Like a ProLoad Test Like a Pro
Load Test Like a ProRob Harrop
 
2023 - AU - CMA - Pre-result Orientation.pptx
2023 - AU - CMA - Pre-result Orientation.pptx2023 - AU - CMA - Pre-result Orientation.pptx
2023 - AU - CMA - Pre-result Orientation.pptxAbdul Azeem
 
Calculate the ROI of your SEO efforts
Calculate the ROI of your SEO effortsCalculate the ROI of your SEO efforts
Calculate the ROI of your SEO effortsBryan Olshock
 
Factory Monthly KSM- New.ppt
Factory Monthly KSM- New.pptFactory Monthly KSM- New.ppt
Factory Monthly KSM- New.pptNittamallik216
 
Transformation 101 - Business Model Workshop
Transformation 101 - Business Model WorkshopTransformation 101 - Business Model Workshop
Transformation 101 - Business Model WorkshopDaniel Li
 
Designing and Running Performance Experiments
Designing and Running Performance ExperimentsDesigning and Running Performance Experiments
Designing and Running Performance ExperimentsJ On The Beach
 

Similar to Picking – Productivity - A location Kaizen 16 (20)

Factory Monthly KSM- AZMERI.ppt
Factory Monthly KSM- AZMERI.pptFactory Monthly KSM- AZMERI.ppt
Factory Monthly KSM- AZMERI.ppt
 
Vsm and wip with arena simulation
Vsm and wip with  arena simulationVsm and wip with  arena simulation
Vsm and wip with arena simulation
 
R & R Accuracy - Location & Inventory Oct14 Kaizen 18
R & R Accuracy - Location & Inventory Oct14 Kaizen 18R & R Accuracy - Location & Inventory Oct14 Kaizen 18
R & R Accuracy - Location & Inventory Oct14 Kaizen 18
 
North East Zone- Guwahati Presentation
North East Zone- Guwahati PresentationNorth East Zone- Guwahati Presentation
North East Zone- Guwahati Presentation
 
How to Improve Your Bottom-Line Through Lean Six Sigma
How to Improve Your Bottom-Line Through Lean Six SigmaHow to Improve Your Bottom-Line Through Lean Six Sigma
How to Improve Your Bottom-Line Through Lean Six Sigma
 
Lean Assessment 03-09-11
Lean Assessment 03-09-11Lean Assessment 03-09-11
Lean Assessment 03-09-11
 
Six Sigma Project Charter Attributa Data of Roshan Weeratunga
Six Sigma Project Charter Attributa Data of Roshan   WeeratungaSix Sigma Project Charter Attributa Data of Roshan   Weeratunga
Six Sigma Project Charter Attributa Data of Roshan Weeratunga
 
Case Quality Management—ToyotaQuality Control Analytics at Toyo.docx
Case Quality Management—ToyotaQuality Control Analytics at Toyo.docxCase Quality Management—ToyotaQuality Control Analytics at Toyo.docx
Case Quality Management—ToyotaQuality Control Analytics at Toyo.docx
 
OMP presentation
OMP presentationOMP presentation
OMP presentation
 
Scheduling by Primavera - Training
Scheduling by Primavera - TrainingScheduling by Primavera - Training
Scheduling by Primavera - Training
 
Activity-Based Costing
Activity-Based CostingActivity-Based Costing
Activity-Based Costing
 
Jared Amato - Six Sigma Green Belt Reporting
Jared Amato - Six Sigma Green Belt ReportingJared Amato - Six Sigma Green Belt Reporting
Jared Amato - Six Sigma Green Belt Reporting
 
Load Test Like a Pro
Load Test Like a ProLoad Test Like a Pro
Load Test Like a Pro
 
2023 - AU - CMA - Pre-result Orientation.pptx
2023 - AU - CMA - Pre-result Orientation.pptx2023 - AU - CMA - Pre-result Orientation.pptx
2023 - AU - CMA - Pre-result Orientation.pptx
 
Calculate the ROI of your SEO efforts
Calculate the ROI of your SEO effortsCalculate the ROI of your SEO efforts
Calculate the ROI of your SEO efforts
 
Monthly-MIS.ppt
Monthly-MIS.pptMonthly-MIS.ppt
Monthly-MIS.ppt
 
Factory Monthly KSM- New.ppt
Factory Monthly KSM- New.pptFactory Monthly KSM- New.ppt
Factory Monthly KSM- New.ppt
 
Transformation 101 - Business Model Workshop
Transformation 101 - Business Model WorkshopTransformation 101 - Business Model Workshop
Transformation 101 - Business Model Workshop
 
Designing and Running Performance Experiments
Designing and Running Performance ExperimentsDesigning and Running Performance Experiments
Designing and Running Performance Experiments
 
SIRFrt Op Ex RCA2015b
SIRFrt Op Ex RCA2015bSIRFrt Op Ex RCA2015b
SIRFrt Op Ex RCA2015b
 

Picking – Productivity - A location Kaizen 16

  • 1. Problem : Productivity Department : Outbound – Picking Area identified for trailing : 4 tire area – A Zone Suggestion : Want to solve the problem by using method of - DMAIC - PDCA
  • 2. STEPS DEFINE Identified the problem – Productivity. Unable to get productivity target (Outbound Sales) – 200 Line with in 8 Hrs. Achieving Average 145 with in 8 Hrs. MESSURE Identify the gap between current and required performance. Gap to be achieved – min 25% more than existing . Collected existing Daily productivity report ANALYSE Listed out prioritize potential causes of the problem. Usually sales team will have 3 members. Now we want picker to be merged with Binning Team. Picker will do only picking. IMPROVE Created simplest and easiest plan. Test solutions using Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle method. CONTROL Formatted new format for future to sustain the improvement efficiency. DMAIC – STEPS
  • 3. PLAN Identified the problem WHAT WHO WHERE Productivity As a tem Sales For trail purpose identified A zone and team Collected data on zone ,Layout pick type material size and team members & training Information on implementation shared with respective team and explained the purpose. DO Segregated data's – On valid point wise. Made a new process and framed new format New Process 1.Team has to be split. 2.Timing of picking and packing has to be registered. Given training on new implementation to respective team. Explained the team with data where we have failed and due to why. Started trailing CHECK Measurement on trailing registered. Picker started to work independently. Picking start time and end time register happening. Monitored on performance and validate training effectiveness. Monitored on Data entry on new format. Collected data and suggestion on trailing from picker team. Analyzing the data registered against on trail. ACT Reviewed feedback. Planned to start 2nd phase trail.
  • 4. Old Format Date Line Challan Qty Val New Format Date Line Challan Qty Val Start Time Close Time Diff
  • 5. Picking – Productivity Team capacity – 03 Team with (Outbound) – 03 Team – 02 Packer - 1 Helper - 1 Picker - 1 Present practice Suggested Packer & Helper Picker will be merged with Binning Team (Inbound) Target – 200 Lines – 8 Hrs Achieving – 140 Lines (Avg) – 8 Hrs
  • 6. Current status Timing Not Maintaining Manpower 3 Productivity Achieving less than 80% Claim Unable to monitor & Control Accuracy – Location Inventory Unable to control Draw back: In current practice
  • 7. Current practice Suggested Productivity Not Maintaining Going to Maintain Manpower 3 2+ 1 Claim Rare Controlling Can control 95% Location Accuracy Unable to Control Can control 95% Inventory Accuracy Unable to Control Can control 95% Productivity Giving 85% to 90% Can achieve more than 100% Rare case only will come down to 80% 90% due to huge Qty Benefits : After change
  • 8. Old Practice (3 person a team) – Team performance report Date Line Chl Qty Val 16.04.2014 152 32 1678 7.17 21.04.2014 150 24 1456 8.89 22.04.2014 112 16 1555 5.63 23.04.2014 115 17 598 3.86 24.04.2014 170 25 1136 10.76 25.04.2014 184 27 1369 7.03 26.04.2014 171 41 1543 13.04 30.04.2014 169 39 1900 13.2 Total 1223 221 11235 69.58 Date Line Chl Qty Val 15.04.2014 50 10 973 4.56 16.04.2014 144 23 1877 13.31 18.04.2014 167 31 1994 10.69 21.04.2014 162 21 1818 11.92 30.04.2014 104 21 698 3.78 Total 627 106 7360 44.26 AVG : 156 AVG : 125 Packer Name : Mr. Manju Packer Name : Mr. Harish
  • 9. Date CH Line Qty Value Time taken Tkt Diff 5/5 16 197 1426 876409.02 6:27 200 3 5/6 26 218 1853 1000759.03 4:36 200 -18 5/7 23 211 1248 640487.61 4:51 200 -11 5/8 22 161 2592 925217.71 5:39 200 39 5/9 12 131 2087 1606866.34 5:10 200 69 5/10 28 134 2041 1323214.1 6:42 200 66 5/12 23 156 3366 1042307.81 5:35 200 44 5/13 34 209 1764 926398.53 4:31 200 -9 5/14 34 203 1695 1192973.18 4:58 200 -3 Date CH Line Qty Value Time taken Tkt Diff 5/5 19 189 1113 515109.81 4:09 200 11 5/6 29 180 1488 758204.29 4:32 200 20 5/7 26 197 1078 786213.86 3:19 200 3 5/8 26 172 3809 1215997.17 6:42 200 28 5/9 13 167 1845 883376.79 5:40 200 33 5/10 22 114 693 528700.31 3:19 200 86 5/12 29 204 1147 616593.24 6:40 200 -4 5/13 31 202 1271 844067.25 5:37 200 -2 5/14 38 234 2728 1157857.23 6:38 200 -34 Date CHLine Qty Value Time taken Tkt Diff 5/6 31 193 1144 680389.26 5:07 200 7 5/7 31 203 1008 682592.44 4:13 200 -3 5/8 23 160 3465 1400349.79 5:23 200 40 5/10 27 207 1094 688901.07 5:25 200 -7 5/12 34 189 1473 894294.49 4:40 200 11 5/13 30 204 1595 1011110.76 5:40 200 -4 5/14 31 215 2049 1418591.98 6:33 200 -15 5/15 33 245 1973 987764.24 6:57 250 5 AVG : 184 AVG : 180 AVG : 196 Picker Name : Mr. Chandrasekar Trail proof
  • 10. Result : Based on analyses average picking time for one manpower is 5.5Hrs. In this 5.5 Hrs Average productivity line is 185. Claim has been reduced by 70% due to this implementation. S. No Improvement Old New % 1 Productivity 145 185 20 2 Claim 10 3 70