User research was conducted from 2012-2016 to enhance the US Postal Service website. Iterative user testing using methods like usability testing, tree testing, card sorting and first click testing helped optimize sections, navigation, task flows and the responsive design. Both moderated and unmoderated methods with hundreds of participants provided insights to modernize the site and improve the user experience on desktop, mobile and tablet. The evolution of the site from 2013 to 2016 showed design and functionality improvements based on the user research findings.
Polkadot JAM Slides - Token2049 - By Dr. Gavin Wood
User research to enhance the us postal service website
1. User Research to Enhance the US Postal Service Website
mbecker@userworks.com jbevitt@userworks.com dhorst@userworks.com
Mark Becker Jake Bevitt Dick Horst
HFES Annual Meeting, Washington DC
September 22, 2016
2. Overview of Work
User Research to Enhance the US Postal
Service Website
September 22, 2016
Iterative user-centered design approach, started in 2012 and still ongoing
Collaboration between UserWorks, Inc. and Aquilent
Overview of work; see conference proceedings paper for more details
Example of USPS’ commitment to improving the user experience
Expand web services (especially mobile), modernize, stay relevant and profitable
Hope to inspire other large organizations/agencies to do the same
3. Sections of USPS.com
User Research to Enhance the US Postal
Service Website
September 22, 2016
Homepage
Global navigation
Postal Store
Making labels (Click-n-Ship)
Global address book
Tracking mail and packages
Information sections
‣ Descriptions of services
‣ Special services for businesses
‣ Shipping requirements/restrictions
‣ Help and FAQ sections
Companion sites and tools Some of the many
features of USPS.com
4. Goals
User Research to Enhance the US Postal
Service Website
September 22, 2016
Test new functionality
Assess new layouts, visual designs
Optimize the navigation
Improve task flows
Increase comprehension of concepts
Modernize older sections of the site
Evaluate the responsive design
Address any known usability issues
Overall, improve the user experience
5. Participants
User Research to Enhance the US Postal
Service Website
September 22, 2016
Users of USPS.com, competitors, novices/first-time/never used before
Those who mail/ship from desktop, tablet, phone
General public, business owners, mail marketers
Frequency, recency of visiting USPS.com
Reasons for visiting USPS.com (make purchases, print labels, find information, etc.)
Age (“millennials”), gender, Internet proficiency, etc.
6. Research Methods Used
User Research to Enhance the US Postal
Service Website
September 22, 2016
Moderated methods
‣ Traditional one-on-one
‣ In-person and remote
‣ Desktop, mobile, and tablet
Unmoderated methods
‣ Tree tests
‣ First-click tests
Card sorts
‣ In-person with physical cards
‣ Remote with online tools Source: https://blog.prototypr.io/
7. Types of Data Collected
User Research to Enhance the US Postal
Service Website
September 22, 2016
Success rates
‣ Accomplishing tasks
‣ Locating content
Time on task
Clickpaths
Errors
Ratings
‣ Perceived difficulty
‣ Confidence
Open-ended feedback
‣ Expectations
‣ Preferences
Comprehension
‣ Terms
‣ Data tables, visualizations
User-created content groupings
Heat maps of where people click
8. Moderated Usability Tests
Typically one-on-one
Representative users perform representative tasks
Follow up with ratings, probing questions
Multiple rounds of moderated usability tests on the
Postal Store
‣ Consumers and business users
‣ In-person and remote
‣ Locate and purchase stamps, decide which type
and how many stamps to purchase
‣ Insights regarding navigation, amount and type
of product information to include, how to
categorize products
User Research to Enhance the US Postal
Service Website
September 22, 2016
A participant attempting
a task during a session
9. Moderated Usability Tests – Pros and Cons
Pros
‣ Ability to direct the course of a session
‣ Direct observation
‣ Can follow up with questions
Cons
‣ Can be time consuming
‣ Sometimes difficult to accommodate busy schedules
‣ Typically smaller sample sizes
User Research to Enhance the US Postal
Service Website
September 22, 2016
10. Unmoderated User Research – Tree Testing
Link sent to participant
Participant accesses application through
link
Application
‣ Displays instructions, tasks
‣ Collects data
Tree test of USPS.com global navigation
‣ General public, hundreds of respondents
‣ Information location tasks
‣ Insights regarding whether architecture
was logical, labels were clear, and what
content belonged together
User Research to Enhance the US Postal
Service Website
September 22, 2016
An example of a
USPS.com tree test
11. Unmoderated User Research – First Click Testing
First click test of USPS.com visual update
‣ General public, hundreds of respondents
‣ Information location tasks
‣ Insights regarding
Whether new design gave enough visual
clues that an area was clickable
Whether labels, menu items were clear
Where participants focused on in the
navigation
User Research to Enhance the US Postal
Service Website
September 22, 2016
Results from a
USPS.com first click test
12. Unmoderated User Research – Pros and Cons
Pros
‣ Larger sample size
‣ Asynchronous, participant does on own time
‣ Can get more data in less time
Cons
‣ Participant behavior may be ambiguous
Rushers
Unmotivated
Help from others
Cheating
‣ Cannot easily ask follow up questions
User Research to Enhance the US Postal
Service Website
September 22, 2016
13. Card Sorts
Organize cards representing content into
logical groups
Either open (participant decides how many
groups and how to label each group) or
closed (number of groups and their labels
are predetermined)
Can be in-person or online
In-person open card sort of the Business
section of USPS.com
‣ Business users and mail marketers
‣ Validated the current information
architecture while identifying areas for
improvement
User Research to Enhance the US Postal
Service Website
September 22, 2016
USPS.com Business
Section card sort
14. Card Sorts – Pros and Cons
Pros
‣ How content is organized helps inform development of the information architecture
‣ Labels given to groups helps inform menu and navigation wording
‣ Can identify content that belongs together, belongs in multiple places, or does not
belong
Cons
‣ Useful for developing the information architecture, but does not provide insights on
layout, visual design, functionality
‣ Participants do not actually see the content they are organizing, just titles or
explanations
‣ Online tools allow for only limited sub-grouping and cannot put the same card in
multiple categories
User Research to Enhance the US Postal
Service Website
September 22, 2016
15. Testing on Mobile Devices
More customers purchasing products using mobile
devices
USPS working to improve user experience of their
mobile site, ensure it has same functionality as the
full site
Usability test of MyUSPS.com tool
‣ Consumers and business users
‣ Obtain expectations and impressions of the tool’s
functionality, comprehension of mailing/shipping
statuses, ability to set account preferences
‣ Insights regarding the tool’s perceived usefulness,
whether it raised privacy concerns, most liked
features, ideas for interface improvements
User Research to Enhance the US Postal
Service Website
September 22, 2016
A participant exploring
the MyUSPS tool
16. Testing on Mobile Devices – Pros and Cons
Pros
‣ Observe participants interacting with the site on the
device(s) it was designed for
‣ Can test responsive design
‣ Can compare usability between mobile and desktop
versions
Cons
‣ Additional technical concerns
‣ May raise privacy concerns if participants use their
own devices
User Research to Enhance the US Postal
Service Website
September 22, 2016
An example mobile test setup
using an overhead camera
17. The Evolution of USPS.com
User Research to Enhance the US Postal
Service Website
September 22, 2016
USPS.com
September 2013
USPS.com
September 2016
18. Thanks for Listening!
User Research to Enhance the US Postal
Service Website
September 22, 2016
Mark Becker
mbecker@userworks.com
Jake Bevitt
jbevitt@userworks.com
Dick Horst
dhorst@userworks.com
UserWorks, Inc. performed the work described in
this paper while acting as a subcontractor to
Aquilent. We gratefully acknowledge their support
and collaboration.