Top Rated Hyderabad Call Girls Chintal ⟟ 9332606886 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine Se...
Selection and evaluation of pharmaceutical packaging materials
1. Selection and Evaluation Of
Pharmaceutical Packaging
Materials
Tushar Prakash Naiknaware
M.Pharm
(Quality Assurance)
Roll No.14
Shri. D.D Vispute College Of Pharmacy &
Research Center
2. A Container Closure System must be designed to protect the drug
during actual conditions of Storage, Shipment and Use.
It should be able to deliver the correct amount of product at the time of use.
It must not interact with the product over its shelf life.
Effort required to develop or select the appropriate Container is based on:
A Risk Assessment considering the Route of Administration.
Class of Drug Product.
Therapeutic Range.
Chemical and Physical Stability of the drug substance.
Drug Product Matrix.
Packaging Component.
Conditions of Storage and Use.
Introduction
3. Some examples of Actual Events of Interaction between
containers and dosage forms:
Migration of plastic additives to drugs
Migration of preservatives
Migration of drug to plastic or coating glass
Migration of chemicals from heat seals, plastics, and foils
into drugs
Degradation of components from sterilization
Migration of inks, adhesives, and chemicals in paper into
inhalation solutions
4. To determine the appropriate container closure system, one should consider
the following:
Preformulation information on the drug substance
The nature of the dosage form
Drug product information
Container material qualification (CAS number, 21 CFR qualification, USP
qualification, etc.)
Container/product compatibility
Impact of the packaging operation on the drug product
Ruggedness of the container system under actual conditions of packaging,
shipping, storage and use
Performance
Selection Of Container Closure
System
6. Material Type Example of Use
Glass Primary Metric Medical Bottle,
Ampoule, Vial
Plastic Primary Ampoule, Vial, Infusion
Fluid Container, Dropper
Bottle
Secondary Wrapper to Contain
Primary Pack
Cardboard Secondary Box to Contain Primary
Pack
Paper Secondary Labels, Patient
Information Leaflet
7. Glass is composed of sand, soda ash, limestone and cullet.
Si, Al, Na, K, Ca, Mg, Zn and Ba are generally used into
preparation of glass.
Types Of Glass
Type I (Neutral or Borosilicate Glass)
Type II (Treated Soda Lime Glass)
Type III (Soda Lime Glass)
Type NP (General Purpose Soda Lime Glass)
Glass
8. Types Of Glass Properties
Type I • Highly resistant glass
• A substantial part of the alkali & earth
cations are replaced by boron and/or
aluminum & zinc.
• It is more chemically inert than the
soda-lime glass
• It is used to contain strong acids &
alkalies as well as all types of
solvents.
Type II • They are made of commercial soda-
lime glass that has been de-alkalized
or treated to remove surface alkali.
Type III • Containers are untreated & made up
of commercial soda-lime glass of
average or better-than-average
chemical resistance.
Type NP • Containers made up of soda-lime
glass are supplied for non-parenteral
products, those intended for oral or
topical use.
9. PACKAGE TYPE TYPE OF FORMULATION CAN BE PACKED MINIMUM QUALITY
OF GLASS THAT CAN
BE USED
Ampoule Aqueous Injectables Of Any pH Type I
Aqueous Injectables Of pH Less Than 7 Type II
Non-Aqueous Injectables Type III
Vial Aqueous Injectables Of Any pH Type I
Aqueous Injectables Of pH Less Than 7 Type II
Non-Aqueous Injectables Type III
Dry Powders For Parenteral Use (Need To Be
Reconstituted Before Use)
Type IV
Bottles and Jars Tablets, Capsules, Oral Solids & Other Solids
For Reconstitution
Type IV
Oral Liquids (Solutions, Suspensions,
Emulsions)
Type IV
Nasal & Ear Drops Type IV
Certain Types Of External Semisolids
(Rubeficients, Local Irritants)
Type IV
Blood & Related Products Type I
10. PACKAGE TYPE TYPE OF FORMULATION CAN BE
PACKED
MINIMUM QUALITY OF
GLASS THAT CAN BE
USED
Dropper Auxiliary Packaging Device With Certain
Kind Of Products
Type IV
Aerosol container Aerosol product ( solution, suspension,
emulsion or semisolid type)
Type I
11. Metal Containers are used Solely for Medicinal Products for
Non-Parenteral Administration.
Metal is Strong, Opaque, Impermeable to Moisture, Gases,
Odors, Light, Bacteria and Shatterproof, it is he ideal
packaging material for pressurized containers.
It is Resistant to High and Low Temperatures.
They include Tubes, Pack made from Foil or Blisters, Cans and
Aerosol and Gas Cylinders.
Aluminum & stainless steel are the metals of choice for both
primary & secondary pharmaceutical packaging.
Form excellent tamper-evident containers.
Metals
12.
13. Rubber is used in the pharmaceutical industry to
make closures, cap liners and bulbs for dropper
assemblies.
The rubber stopper is used primarily for multiple dose
vials and disposable syringes.
Rubber closures for containers for aqueous
parenteral.
Preparations for powders and for freeze-dried
powders.
Rubbers
14. Type Of Rubber Advantages Disadvantages
Butyl Rubber • They are most Resistant to
Aging & Chemical Attack.
• Permeability to Water Vapor &
Air is Very Low.
• Water Absorption is Very Low.
• Slow Decomposition
takes place above 130
Celsius.
• Oil and solvent
resistance is not very
good .
Nitrile Rubber • Oil resistant due to polar Nitrile
Group.
• Heat resistant.
• Absorption of
bactericide and
leaching of extractives
are considerable.
Chloroprene Rubbers • This rubber is more polar hence
oil resistant.
• Heat stability is good (up to 150
Celsius).
• Water absorption and
permeability are less.
-----------
Silicone Rubber • Heat Resistance (Up to 250
Celsius).
• Extremely Low Absorption and
Permeability of Water.
• Excellent Aging Characteristics.
• They are very
Expensive.
15. Advantages :
Ease of manufacturing.
Available in various types of quality.
Freedom of design to which they lend themselves.
Extremely resistant to breakage.
Ease of Transportation.
They are resistant to inorganic chemicals.
Disadvantages:
They have disadvantages like interaction, adsorption, lightness and
hence poor physical stability.
All are permeable to some degree to moisture, oxygen, carbon
dioxide, etc.
Plastics
16. COMMONLY USED POLYMERS LESS COMMONLY USED POLYMERS
Polyethylene Polymethyl methacrylate
Polypropylene Polyethylene terephthalate
Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) Polytrifluoroethylene
Polystyrene Amino formaldehydes
Polyamides
Type of Plastic Polymer Properties Uses
Polyethylen
e
LDPE • Ease of Processing
• Barrier to Moisture
• Strength/Toughness
• Flexibility
Preferred Plastic for
Squeeze Bottles
HDPE • Stiffness
• Strength /Toughness
• Resistance to Chemicals
Widely used in bottles
for solid dosage forms
Polypropylene • Good Resistance to Heat
Sterilization.
• Colorless and Odorless
Thermoplastic Material.
• Excellent Resistance to
Strong acids & alkalis.
Suitable for use in
closures, tablet
containers and
intravenous bottles.
17. Type of Plastic Polymer Properties Uses
Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) • Versatility
• Ease of bending
• Strength/Toughness
• Resistance to
Grease/Oil
• Resistance to
Chemicals
• Clarity
Used as Rigid Packaging
Materials & Main
Component of
Intravenous Bags.
Polystyrene • Versatility
• Insulation
• Clarity
Used for Jars for
Ointments and Creams
with low water content.
18. It is performed to investigate the Physicochemical
interactions that might occur between the product
and package.
Packaging evaluation is designed to identify,
characterized and monitor interactions to achieve a
safe, unadulterated, stable and efficacious product.
An Important step – to characterize the materials and
the chemicals that can migrate or extract from
packaging components to the drug product.
Packaging Evaluation
19. To Establish suitability, Evaluation of Four Attributes is
Required -
20. As per USP, Mainly Three Tests are done:
Powder Glass Test
Water Attack Test
Hydrolytic Resistance Test
Tests For Glass
21. The water attack test at 121C is performed on intact
containers.
The containers are filled up to 90% of their overflow
capacity Containers are autoclaved for 60 min.
Then content of container are cooled & from cooled
content 100m1 of the solution.
Water Attack Test
22. Steps-
Rinse 3 or more containers with high purity water
Fill each container to 90%of its overflow capacity
Cap all the flasks, autoclave for 60 min
Empty the contents & cool the contents in 250m1 conical
flask to a volume of 100m1
Add five drops of methyl red solution
Titrate with 0.02N Sulphuric acid while warm
Record the volume consumed
Volume should not exceed limits,
23. Types of
glass
General description
of glass
Types of
test
Limits
size ml
Limits (ml
of 0.20N)
1 Highly resistant
borosilicate glass
Powdered
glass
All 1.0
2 Treated soda lime
glass
Water
attack
100 or
less
0.7
Over 100 0.2
3 Soda —lime glass Powdered
glass
All 8.5
4 General —purpose
soda lime glass
Powdered
glass
All 15.0
Types Of Glass & Their Limits
24. This test is done for detecting the type of glass
Hydrolytic Test
Type of container Test to be done
Type 1 & type 2 glass containers to
distinguish from type 3 glass
containers
Test 1 (surface test)
Type 1 & type 2 glass containers where
it is necessary to determine whether
the high hydrolytic resistance is due to
the chemical composition or the
surface treatment
Test 1 &2
25. Test 1 – Surface Glass Test
Wash containers with carbon dioxide free water
Fill the containers with CO2 free water (90%)
Close with aluminum foil
Autoclave at 1009-1209C for 20 min
Maintain at 120°C for 1 hr
At lower temp for 40 min
Remove containers & cool
Titrate it within 1 hour
Titrate with 0.01 M HCL (end point colourless)
Repeat with same volume of CO2 free water
26. Volume Of Test Solution To Be Used
1 Up to 3 At least 20 25.0
2 5 or less At least 50.0
3 6 to 30 At least 50.0
4 More than 30 At least 100.0
27. Capacity of container Corresponding
to 90% avg over flow volume ml)
Volume of 0.01M HCI for 100
ml of test solution
Type 1 or 2
glass (ml)
Type 3 glass
(ml)
Volume Of 0.01 M HCl Required By Test Solution
Not more than 1 2.0 20.0
More than 1 but not more than 2 1.8 17.6
More than 2 but not more than 5 1.3 13.2
More than 5 but not more than 10 1.0 10.2
More than 10 but not more than 20 0.80 8.1
More than 20 but not more than 50 0.60 6.1
More than 50 but not more than 100 0.50 4.8
More than 100 but not more than 200 0.40 3.8
More than 200 but not more than 500 0.30 2.9
More than 500 0.20 2.2
28. Test 2
Rinse container twice with water and with 4%volume
solution of HF
Allow to stand for 10min
Empty the container
Rinse 5 times with water
Carry out test similar test 1
29. Leak test:
The plastic containers (non injectables and injectables):
Fill 10 plastic containers with water and fit the closure.
Keep them inverted at room temperature for 24
hours.
No sign of leakage should be there from any
container.
Tests For Plastic Containers
30. Water permeability test:
Fill 5 containers with nominal volume of water and sealed.
Weigh each container.
Allow to stand for 14 days at relative humidity of 60% at 20-
25 degree Celsius.
Again weigh the container.
Loss of weight in each container should not be more than
0.2%.
Collapsibility Test:
This test is applicable to the containers which are to be
squeezed for removing the contents.
A container by collapsing inward during use, yield at least
90% of its normal contents at the required rate of flow at
ambient temperature.
31. Preparation Of Sample (Solution-A):
Wash closures in 0.2%w/v of an surface active agents
for 5min.
Rinse 5 times with distilled water and add 200m1
water and is subjected to autoclave at 119 to 123 °C for
20 to 30m in covering with aluminum foil.
Cool and separate solution from closure (solution-A).
Tests For Rubber Closures
32. I. Sterility Test:
When treated closures are subjected to sterilization
test at 64-66°C and a pressure of about 0.7 KPa for 24hr.
II. Residue On Evaporation:
50ml of solution A is evaporated to dryness at
105°CThen weigh the residue NMT 4mg.
III. Penetrability:
This is measured to check the force required to make a
hypodermic needle penetrate easily through the closure.
It is measured by using the piercing machine.
The piercing force must not exceed a stated value.
If it exceeds that stated value, the hypodermic needle can
be damaged as a result of undesirable hardness of the
closures.
33. IV. Fragmentation Test:
For closures for aqueous
preparations
For closures for dry
preparations
Place a vol of water corresponding to
the nominal vol minus 4 ml each of 12
clean vials
Close the vials with the 'prepared'
closures& allow to stand for 16 hours
Close 12 clean
vials with the '
prepared'
closures
Using a hypodermic needle with an external diameter of 0 8 mm inject 1 ml of
water into the vial and remove 1 m I of air
Carty out this operation 4 times with new neede each time
34. V. Self - Sealability Test:
This test is applicable to closures intended to be used with
water.
Close the vials with the 'Prepared' closures
For each closure, use a new hypodermic needle with an external
diameter of 0.8 mm & pierce the closure 10 times, each time at a
different site.
Immerse the vials upright in a 0.1% w/v solution of methylene blue &
reduce the external pressure by 27KPa for 10 min.
Restore the atmospheric pressure and leave the vials immersed for 30
minutes. Rinse the outside of the vials.
None of the vials contains any trace of colored solution.
Pass the liquid in the vials through a filter with a pores size of 0.5 um.
No of fragments is NMT 10 excepts In the case of butyl rubber closures
a here the total no of fragments is NMT 15
35. I. Description:
Metallic tins having smooth inner surface. The upper surface is
sealed consists a clip to break the seal. The lower surface is open.
II. Dimensions:
Height- Measure the height in mm of 10 metallic tin, individually
from the lower surface edge to the upper rim.
Limit- Specimen metallic tins with tolerance-170mm±1Omm.
III. Diameter:
Inner diameter- Measure the inner diameter of 10 metallic tins.
Limit- NLT 98mm.
Outer diameter: Limit-NMT 105mm.
IV. Cleanliness Check:
It should not be dirty, damaged, stained or consist of any
foreign particles.
Tests For Metal