Transcat's "Calibration's Role in the Manufacturing Jigsaw Puzzle" Presentation

Calibration s
Calibration’s Role
in the Manufacturing Jigsaw Puzzle
g g

Webinar hosted and presented by
p y

Better by Your Every Measure • 800.828.1470 • www.transcat.com

Agenda

 The Big Picture: Manufacturing Goals
g g
 Puzzle Pieces: Segregation of Departments/Functions
 The Calibration Puzzle Piece
 The Piece Appears to Fit . . . But Does It Really?
 Getting the Pieces to Fit Properly
g p y


The Big Picture: Manufacturing Goals

 Making p
g products that are:
• In market demand
• Profitable
• Effective
ff
• Safe


Puzzle Pieces: Segregation of Depts/Functions

 Some functions of the manufacturing p
g process are split apart
p p
into separate departments
 Some functions or sub-functions/sub-assemblies are
outsourced


Puzzle Pieces: Segregation of Depts/Functions

 Materials are purchased from multiple sources
p p
 Sub-assemblies are made at local tool shops
• Some companies enforce quality of parts on the supplier
• Some companies check a sample of supplier parts for quality


The Calibration Puzzle Piece(s)

 How has Calibration been segregated from the
g g
manufacturing process?
 What was the original point of calibration in manufacturing?
• Many manufacturers have lost the connection between calibration
and the original goals of business
 How has this ‘calibration silo affected manufacturing?
calibration silo’


The Piece Appears to Fit . . . But Does It Really?

 Calibrations may be taking p
y g place but . . .
 . . . that doesn’t mean Measurement Assurance is in place!
• Example: Omega HH82A
• What similar risks do your current calibrations impose?


Getting the Pieces to Fit Properly

 If a manufacturing business is interested in:
g
• Maximizing Profits
• Product Safety & Quality . . .
 Then they must have an active Measurement Assurance
program



 An active Measurement Assurance program consists of:
• Right tool for the job (i.e., suitability)
• Regular calibration
– Calibrations that support the process where the instrument is
used
– Calibrations that supply the correct tolerances
– Calibrations that are valid (i.e., calibration measurement
uncertainties support the measurements made)
• Using the instrument/tool correctly
• Accounting for irregularities in the production measurement process
(i.e., Process measurement uncertainties)
• OOT investigations performed properly
• Corrective action taken for OOT impacting product



 Example: Temperature measurement
p p
• Mfg Engineer needs to measure solution used to treat product
• Process measurement is 350° ± 2° C
• Which instrument is suitable f this measurement?
for ?
LL: UL:
Process Process

348°C 350°C 352°C



 Process measurement
• An instrument with an accuracy equal to the process limits?
• Not good because the instrument can drift the full amount over its cal
interval,
interval directly impacting previous process measurements
LL: UL:
Process Process

348°C 350°C 352°C



• Instrument has been calibrated today and adjusted to nominal
• Instrument is used to measure solution temperature the same day
• S
Solution temperature is right at nominal: 350° C
°
LL: UL:
Process Process

348°C 350°C 352°C



• Instrument is on its last day of use before it will be recalibrated
• Instrument is used to measure solution temperature
• S
Solution temperature is right at nominal: 350° C
°
LL: UL:
Process Process

348°C 350°C 352°C



 Temperature Instrument Calibration
p
• Instrument is recalibrated (and subsequently was adjusted)
• As Found reading shows the instrument drifted to upper limit: 352° C
• This drift occurred over its calibration interval
f
LL: UL:
UUT UUT

348°C 350°C 352°C



 Temperature Instrument Calibration
p
• Did it move all at once or a little over time?
• How does this impact the measurements of the process since the
last time the temperature instrument was calibrated?
LL: UL:
UUT UUT

348°C 350°C 352°C



 OOT-NCR Evaluation
• It must be assumed this shift occurred immediately following the last
calibration because that is the only supporting evidence to show the
last known good condition of its temperature values
LL: UL:
Process Process

x

348°C 350°C 352°C



• So the process measurements taken on the day the instrument was
previously calibrated were not actually 350° C, they were 348° C
• The same applies to the process readings at the end of the cal cycle
LL: UL:
Process Process

x

348°C 350°C 352°C



• What if some process readings indicated the solution was at its lower
limit: 348° C? This would be acceptable for the process test, but . . .
• The In Tolerance cal would not have flagged this situation as ‘at risk’!!
at risk !!
LL: UL:
Process Process

x

348°C 350°C 352°C



 Instrument with better accuracy:
y
• What if an instrument was selected with an accuracy twice as good?
• If it drifted to its limit, process readings would only be off half of the
process tolerance
LL: LL: UL: UL:
Process UUT UUT Process

x

348°C 349°C 350°C 351°C 352°C



y
• What if an instrument was selected with an accuracy 4X as good?
• If it drifted to its limit, process readings would only be off one quarter
of the process tolerance
LL: LL: UL: UL:

x

348°C 349.5°C 350°C 350.5°C 352°C



y
• How far can we take this? 10X better? 100X better?
• There are limits of technology and/or it eventually becomes cost
prohibitive to go too far with this concept
LL: LL: UL: UL:

x

348°C 349.5°C 350°C 350.5°C 352°C



y
• Traditionally, a 4:1 ratio is sufficient to reduce the probability that an
OOT will have an impact on the product/process
• For some measurements this cannot be achieved so risk is higher
measurements, achieved,
LL: LL: UL: UL:

x

348°C 349.5°C 350°C 350.5°C 352°C



y
• However, if one or more of the process measurements was at its
lower limit . . . risk still exists for this “In Tolerance” calibration
• Using the “As Found cal value all readings were higher by 0 5° C
As Found” value, 0.5°
LL: LL: UL: UL:

347.5°C
x

348°C 349.5°C 350°C 350.5°C 352°C



 Lesson Learned:
• Even In Tolerance results can impact your process measurements!
• All cal data must be reviewed against process measurements to
understand the impact to the product (IT NCR evaluation)
(IT-NCR
• Impact studies are expensive; consumes valuable resources
• Can cost thousands of dollars per evaluation event
p
• Parts or product likely have already been released/shipped
• Could require product recall
• If not released, could require rework
• This risk can be reduced
• Guard Band the process limits!



 What is Guard Band?
• Determine realistic tolerance limits for the process measurement
• Reduce these limits by the tolerance of the instrument used in the
process to arrive at Lower/Upper Acceptance Limits
LL: LAL: LL: UL: UAL: UL:
Process Process UUT UUT Process Process

347.5°C
x x

348°C 348.5°C 349.5°C 350°C 350.5°C 351.5°C 352°C



 Guard Band result:
• Now if the instrument cal reveals a drift up to the maximum tolerance
there is no need to perform IT-NCR evaluation
• If instrument error is greater than this (i e it is OOT) then OOT NCR
(i.e. OOT), OOT-NCR
LL: LAL: LL: UL: UAL: UL:
Process Process UUT UUT Process Process

x

348°C 348.5°C 349.5°C 350°C 350.5°C 351.5°C 352°C



 Summary:
y
• Implement a good Measurement Assurance Program
• Understand and exercise good Suitability selection
• Guard Band the process tolerance limits to reduce costly NCR evals
G C
• Understand both the process and the calibration to ensure the intent
of preserving good measurements on the product is not lost
p gg p
• Be thorough in your NCR evaluations
• Get help if you’re in over your head!


Thank You for Joining Us!

Questions?

800.828.1470
www.transcat.com

Transcat's "Calibration's Role in the Manufacturing Jigsaw Puzzle" Presentation

Recomendados

Recomendados

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Mais procurados (20)

Destaque

Destaque (17)

Semelhante a Transcat's "Calibration's Role in the Manufacturing Jigsaw Puzzle" Presentation

Semelhante a Transcat's "Calibration's Role in the Manufacturing Jigsaw Puzzle" Presentation (20)

Mais de Transcat

Mais de Transcat (20)

Último

Último (20)

Transcat's "Calibration's Role in the Manufacturing Jigsaw Puzzle" Presentation