1. PotentialDifferenceCanadaInc.
2013
HAPPYMOTEREARTHDAY
Potential Difference Inc has developed three new energy innovations
which now all make the Global Warming issue moot…
The first innovation is the ReGenX Generator which has the proven
ability to accelerate itself under load and the capacity to deliver an
infinite amount more electrical power when compared to a
conventional generator under identical conditions:
2009 Test Data from NRC Scientist Doug Hartwich:
https://www.box.net/s/kqo8knpgk7femc0jldnz
The second innovation is a Bi-Toroid Transformer which operates with
infinite efficiency and only consumes reactive power but delivers real
power to the load. Canadian Defence Research and Development
scientist Dr. Giovanni Fusina independent third party test data:
https://www.box.com/files/email/thaneh@potentialdifference.ca/0/f/
82938692/1/f_721619244
The third innovation is the ReGen-X Motor which has the ability to
recapture all motor coil magnetic flux into a ReGenX generator coil
and produce torque with NET zero power consumption.
All three energy innovations are now being commercialized globally.
If humanity does not
opt for integrity we are
through completely. It
is absolutely touch and
go. Each one of us could
make the difference.
~ R. Buckminster Fuller

2. Alternative Solution to the ChemTrail Agenda
Page 2
Regenerative Acceleration (ReGenX) Electric Generator
Potential Difference Inc. has developed a new electric generator at the University of Ottawa
which has the capacity to accelerate itself when delivering power to a load and has the proven
capacity to deliver over 800% more electrical output power to a load over any conventional
generator currently used today. And it does so with over 60% less input power.
Independent third party tests performed at the University of Ottawa by a National Research
Council scientist Doug Hartwick:
https://www.box.com/files/email/thaneh@potentialdifference.ca/0/f/82938692/1/f_721619244#/files/0/f/0/1/f_5554651590 .
Bi-Toroid Transformer
Potential Difference has developed a new electric transformer at the University of Ottawa which
has the capacity to consume only Pure Reactive power in the Primary but deliver Real Power to
the load and operate at over 450% efficiency:
Independent third party tests performed at the University of Ottawa by a Canadian Defence
Research and Development scientist Dr. Giovanni Fusina:
https://www.box.com/files/email/thaneh@potentialdifference.ca/0/f/82938692/1/f_721619244
See page 22 for NRC ReGenX Generator Test Methodology

3. Alternative Solution to the ChemTrail Agenda
Page 3
Chemtrails - US Military Continues To Spray
Chemical-Laden Skytrails
By William Thomas
willthomas@telus.net
© 2001 William Thomas
10-20-1
Covert Climate Control? Under the banner of some top-secret scientific agenda, the US military continues to weave
chemical-laden contrails in the skies, causing health problems for unprotected people on the ground.
For nearly three years, chemtrail observers have hoped an official would step forward to explain the origin and purpose
of broad white plumes criss-crossing the skies above a dozen allied nations. Their wait is over...
It was nearly noon when S.T. Brendt awoke and entered the kitchen of her country home in Parsonsfield, Maine. As she
poured her first cup of coffee, the late night reporter for WMWV Radio could not have guessed that her life was minutes
away from drastic change. Her partner Lou Aubuchont was already up, puzzling over what he had seen in the sky a half-
hour before. The fat puffy plumes arching up over the horizon were unlike any contrail he had ever seen, even during his
hitch in the Navy.
Like breath exhaled on a winter's day, the contrails he was used to seeing would flare briefly in the stratosphere as hot
moist engine exhaust flash-freezes into a stream of ice-crystals. These pencil-thin condensation trails are pretty to watch
but short-lived, subliming into invisibility as exhaust gases cool quickly to the surrounding air temperature.
But in late 1997, Aubuchont started observing thicker 'trails extending >from horizon to horizon. Hanging in the sky long
after their creators had flown from view, these expanding white ribbons would invariably be interwoven by more thick
lines left by unmarked jets, Air Force white or silver in colour.
On this March 12th morning in 2001, Lou did not mention his sighting as S.T. indulged in caffeine. Sipping gratefully, she
glanced out the window. It looked like another gorgeous, cloudless day. But not quite. Brendt baulked at several chalk
marks scrawled across the crystalline blue sky. "Contrails or chemtrails?" she jokingly remarked. Lou got up and looked.
What kind of clouds run exactly side by side in a straight line? he wondered. It's just too perfect to happen naturally.
When he said he wasn't sure, S.T. stopped smiling and went outside.
Looking up towards the southeast over West Pond, she spotted the first jet. A second jet was laying billowing white
banners to the north. Both aircraft appeared to be at over 30,000 feet. Turning her gaze due west, Brendt saw two more
lines extending over the horizon. She called Lou. Within 45 minutes the couple counted 30 jets. This isn't right, S.T.
thought. We just don't have that kind of air traffic here. While Lou kept counting, she went inside and started calling
airports. One official she reached was guarded but friendly. He had relatives in West Pond.

4. Alternative Solution to the ChemTrail Agenda
Page 4
The Air Traffic Control manager told Brendt her sighting was "unusual". His radars showed nine commercial jets during
the same 45-minute span. From her location, he said, she should have been able to see one plane.
And the other twenty-nine? The FAA official confided off the record that he had been ordered "by higher civil authority"
to re-route inbound European airliners away from a "military exercise" in the area. "Of course, they wouldn't give me
any of the particulars and I don't ask," he explained. "I just do my job."
Excited and puzzled by this information, S.T. and Lou got into their car and headed down Route 160. Looking in any
direction they could see five or six jets flying at over 30,000 feet. Never in the dozen years they'd lived in rural Maine
had they seen so much aerial activity.
A former US Navy Intelligence courier, Aubuchont was used to large-scale military exercises. But he told S.T. he had
never seen anything this big. "It looked like an invasion," he later recounted.
Another driver almost went off the road as he leaned over his dashboard trying to look up. As they passed, he
acknowledged them with a nod.
As far as they could see stretched line after line. Two giant grids were especially blatant. Instead of dissipating like
normal contrails, these sky trails grew wider and wider and began to merge. Looking towards the Sun, Aubuchont saw
what appeared like "an oil and water mixture" reflecting a prismatic band of colours. He couldn't call it a rainbow.
Rainbows aren't sinister.
As Lou and S.T. completed their errands, the jets kept them company, leaving lines and even circles that resembled
smoke rings. Even living near Kennedy, LaGuardia and Newark jetports, Aubuchont had never seen so many big jets
performing identical manoeuvres in the same sky. When they returned to Parsonsfield around four, the lines were
starting to merge into a dingy haze.
Richard Dean called back. After receiving S.T.'s message, the assistant WMWV news director had gone outside with
other news staff and counted 370 lines in skies usually devoid of aerial activity.
Brendt put in another call to the FAA official. He had never heard of chemtrails. In their first face-to-face interview, the
chain-smoking controller responsible for air traffic over the northeastern seaboard repeated his earlier statements on
tape. Similar military activities were ongoing in other regions, he added. On his 'scopes he could track the tankers flying
north into Canadian airspace.
Speaking before witnesses at WMWV on condition of strict anonymity, our "Deep Sky" source answered a series of
yes/no questions I helped Brendt prepare when she contacted me.
After nearly three years on this case, I wanted to corroborate extremely high levels of aluminum [aluminium] powder
found in samples of rainwater falling through thick sky plumes over Espanola, Ontario, in the spring of 1998.
The Espanola lab tests were conducted after residents began complaining to the provincial environment ministry. Severe
headaches, chronic joint pain, dizziness, sudden extreme fatigue, acute asthma attacks and feverless "flu-like" symptoms
over a 50-square-mile area coincided with what they termed "months of 'spraying'" by photo-identified US Air Force
tanker planes.

5. Alternative Solution to the ChemTrail Agenda
Page 5
The USAF denied the intrusions. But former Ontario Provincial Police Officer and Supreme Court expert witness Ted
Simola reported lingering Xs and numerous white trails, some of which "just ended" as if they had been shut off but
remained in the sky.
Another Espanola resident told me that mental confusion and short-term memory loss were so prevalent that forgetting
where their cars were parked had become "a standing joke" in the tiny town.
On November 18, 1998, the people of Espanola petitioned Parliament. Addressing the Canadian government on their
behalf, defence critic Gordon Earle explained:
"Over 500 residents of the Espanola area have signed a petition raising concern over possible government involvement
in what appears to be aircraft emitting visible aerosols. They have found high traces of aluminum and quartz in
particulate and rainwater samples.
"These concerns combined with associated respiratory ailments have led these Canadians to take action and seek clear
answers from this government. The petitioners call upon Parliament to repeal any law that would permit the dispersal of
military chaff or of any cloud-seeding substance whatsoever by domestic or foreign military aircraft without the
informed consent of the citizens of Canada thus affected."
The Ministry of Defence eventually replied: "It's not us."
Which was true. While the US Air Force counts 650 four-engine KC-135 Stratotankers and 50 KC-10 Extenders in its
active inventory, Canadian Forces do not fly armadas of tankers. But they do operate the biggest radar installation in
Canada at CFB Comox on Vancouver Island, easily capable of tracking the American formations coming up from the
south.
"Was the classified operation a radar experiment?" we asked Deep Sky.
"That wasn't what I was told."
Were ATC radars "enhanced or degraded", we wanted to know. The barium spread in exercises conducted out of
Wright-Patterson Air Force Base acts as an electrolyte, enhancing conductivity of radar and radio waves. "Wright Pat"
has also long been deeply engaged in HAARP's electromagnetic warfare program.
A SKY SHIELD TO COMBAT GLOBAL WARMING?
The puzzle pieces fell into place with Deep Sky's revelation that ATC radars were being "degraded" by tanker-released
particles showing up as a "haze" on their screens. This radar characteristic matched the high concentrations of
aluminum powder found along with a preponderance of quartz particles in Espanola's chemtrail-contaminated
rainwater.
The tankers' aluminum powder emissions also matched the Welsbach patent. Issued in 1994 to the Hughes aerospace
giant "for Reduction of Global Warming", the sky shield blueprint calls for dispensing microscopic particles of aluminum
oxide and other reflective materials into the upper atmosphere to reflect one or two per cent of incoming sunlight.
Computer simulations by Ken Caldeira at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory calculated that this would be enough
to stop warming over 85 per cent of the planet, despite an anticipated doubling of carbon in the atmosphere within the
next 50 years.

6. Alternative Solution to the ChemTrail Agenda
Page 6
Lawrence Livermore priced the aerial spray program at US$1 billion dollars a year--a cheap fix to maintain massive
petroleum profits in the face of Kyoto's internationally agreed carbon cutbacks.
Livermore's founder, Edward Teller, lobbied hard for another chance to play with planetary processes. At the 1998
International Seminar on Planetary Emergencies, the Father of the H-bomb presented his Next Big Idea. Having earlier
pressed for detonating nuclear bombs to carve new harbours out of American coastlines, Teller now called for reflective
chemicals to be spread like mirror-shades over the Earth. Or at least over allies who could agree in secret for this
unprecedented geoengineering experiment to be carried out over their unsuspecting constituents.
In a draft report leaked to me soon after it appeared for peer review in May 2000, an expert panel chosen among 3,000
atmospheric scientists looked at Caldeira's computer simulations and agreed that Teller's scheme might work. But the
IPCC warned against unpredictable upsets of the atmosphere, as well as against angry populaces reacting to "the
associated whitening of the visual appearance of the sky".
Caldeira was so concerned he went public, warning that deflecting sunlight would further cool the stratosphere,
concentrating icy clouds of ozone-gobbling CFCs that could destroy Earth's solar radiation shield.
Was the sky shield experiment already underway? Deep Sky hinted that it was.
Were the tankers involved in weather modification? Our FAA source hesitated before responding. "That approximates
what I was told."
For the third interview we rephrased our key question. Were the tankers repeatedly observed on ATC radars involved in
climate modification? I caught my breath as Deep Sky confirmed that this is what he was told was the object of the
missions.
Here at last was our "smoking nuke" admission. After years of "airliner" double-speak, we could now corroborate Deep
Sky's report of military aircraft dispensing reflective materials with an earlier report by a Canadian aviation official.
On December 8, 2000, Terry Stewart, the Manager for Planning and Environment at the Victoria International Airport,
had broken this story wide open when he responded to a caller's complaint the previous day of Xs, circles and grids
being woven over the British Columbia capitol. Leaving a message on an answering machine tape, later heard by more
than 15 million radio listeners, the public servant explained: "It's a military exercise, US and Canadian Air Force exercise
that's going on. They wouldn't give me any specifics on it."
Stewart added that he found the incident--one of hundreds reported over Canada's west coast since the fall of 1998--
"very odd".
Tasked with defending Canadian airspace in the region, CFB Comox chose instead to defend a classified collaboration.
"No military operation is taking place," the base information officer tersely told me when I called for details. But Stewart
later told the Vancouver Courier that his information had come directly from CFB Comox.

7. Alternative Solution to the ChemTrail Agenda
Page 7
CONTRAILS vs CHEMTRAILS
Across the strait from the island air base, a concerned mother of three children was noticing that people in Gibsons were
coming down with ailments that coincided with constant chemtrail activity. Suzanne Smart's husband contracted
asthma; their children were always sniffling and coughing. Smart ended up in the small coastal town's Emergency unit
with a sore throat, "super-stiff" neck, pounding headache and ears "ringing like crazy". Even her teeth hurt.
It was all very nerve-wracking. Smart contacted a Transport Canada investigator who had noticed the jet trails too and
was convinced it was normal contrail activity. Why he took special notice of normal contrails was not explained. But the
TC official told Smart he hoped the Canadian equivalent of the FAA would be notified of any military exercises taking
place.
On June 17, 2001, after photographing massive plumes over Gibsons, Smart checked with aviation authorities and found
that no airline flight plans had been filed for that airspace at that time. Official weather data showed that when her
photos of multiple white plumes were taken, the 30 per cent humidity at 30,000 and 35,000 feet was less than half that
needed for contrails to form.
As NOAA meteorologist Thomas Schlatter explains, for even short-lived condensation trails to form, "we're talking
temperatures lower than about minus 76 degrees Fahrenheit, and humidity at jet altitudes of 70 per cent or more".
Smart sent her findings to Transport Canada with a request for an explanation of how contrails could form when they
couldn't. "It is my understanding," she wrote, "that the only way to form jet trails at yesterday's low humidity is to
introduce very fine particulates into the atmosphere."
Smart's homework hit like hardball. According to the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colorado,
the only way to form artificial clouds in warm dry air is to introduce enough particulates into the atmosphere to attract
and accrete all available moisture into visible vapour. If repeated often enough, the resulting rainless haze can lead to
drought.
Following standard procedure to ignore all evidence contradicting the official line, Transport Canada's Randy Phillips
responded by advising Smart to check out the "urban legends" website ridiculing chemtrails.
Col. Walter Washbaugh, Chief of the Congressional Inquiry Division for the Secretary of the Air Force in Washington, DC,
also calls chemtrails "a hoax". In an April 20, 2001, letter to a US senator, Washbaugh blamed the increased number of
contrails on "significant civil aviation growth in the past decade".
He was right. A National Science Foundation study has found that, in certain heavy traffic corridors, artificial cloud cover
has increased by as much as 20 per cent since the jet age took off. Dr Patrick Minnis, a CERES atmospheric researcher
and ardent chemtrails critic at NASA's Langley Research Center, reports that cirrus cloud cover over the United States is
up five per cent overall because particulates in engine exhaust are acting as cloud-forming nuclei. As the number of
flights currently exceeds 15 million annually worldwide, the NSF, NASA and EPA predict artificial clouds will intensify as
air travel continues climbing sharply.
What about chemtrails? Colonel Washbaugh ascribed widely reported grid patterns to overlapping aircraft flying north-
south, east-west airways. The only thing wrong with this explanation, an air traffic controller told me in Texas, is that US
airways do not run north-south.

8. Alternative Solution to the ChemTrail Agenda
Page 8
The biggest laugh came when the colonel told the senator: "The Air Force is not conducting any weather modification
and has no plans to do so in the future."
In fact, attempts to steer hurricanes by spraying heat-robbing chemicals in their paths began in the 1950s. The recipe for
creating "cirrus shields" was outlined in an unusually arrogant US Air Force study. Subtitled "Owning the Weather by
2025", the 1996 report explained how "weather force specialists" were dispersing chemicals behind high-flying tanker
aircraft in a process the air force calls "aerial obscuration".
Official denials reached new altitudes of absurdity when another colonel claimed: "The US Air Force does not conduct
spraying operations over populated areas." USAF spokeswoman Margaret Gidding told a Spokane newspaper: "The Air
Force doesn't do anything that emits anything other than a normal contrail, which is vapor."
So were their replies. Apparently Anderson and Gidding had forgotten how US Air Force spray planes crippled a country
and a culture by dispensing over Vietnam thousands of tons of "Agent Orange" defoliants containing dioxin toxins as
hazardous as plutonium.
SEEING IS BELIEVING?
In the end, it has proved impossible to continue skywriting giant billboards advertising government duplicity, while
insisting they are not there. By the summer of 2001, the controversy entered a new phase. Pictures of contrails were
being distributed to newspapers by the Associated Press, and "chemtrails" could be overheard in coffee shop
conversations across an entire continent.
When it comes to chemtrails, seeing is disbelieving official disinformation. As public awareness grows, people like war
veteran David Oglesby are looking up. The 11 fat plumes fanning out over his Coarsegold, California, home did it for
Oglesby last June.
"The trails formed a grid pattern," he told WorldNetDaily News. "Some stretched from horizon to horizon. Some began
abruptly, and others ended abruptly. They hung in the air for an extended period of time and gradually widened into
wispy clouds resembling spider webs."
A retired US Air Force radar tech named Shimera called a colonel responsible for all military operations in central
California. "What would you say if I said there are three aircraft up there right now?" Shimera asked. "Are they there?"
"No," the colonel replied. "They are not there."
The Houston study is not so easily dismissed. Mark Steadham was looking for contrails when he started observing the
skies over this busy Texas hub last winter. Using FAA tracking software called Flight Explorer to identify each aircraft,
Steadham clocked contrails trailing from Boeing, McDonnell-Douglas and Airbus airliners. All but two of these
condensation trails sublimed into invisibility within five to 20 seconds; the only exceptions persisted for two and 25
minutes.
Flight Explorer does not show altitudes for military jets, but, according to the FAA, tankers and transports usually transit
continental airspace at around 30,000 feet to ensure safe separation from airliners flying between 35,000 and 39,000
feet. Military "heavies" flying below 30,000 feet should not leave contrails at all. Major-General Gregory Barlow confirms
that Air Force tankers do not perform refuelling missions at contrail-forming altitudes.

9. Alternative Solution to the ChemTrail Agenda
Page 9
But Steadham found just the opposite in his study. While observing air traffic for 63 days, the Houston skywatcher found
that thick white plumes laid by similar-sized military aircraft--at the same time, in the same airspace as 20-second
airliner contrails--lingered for four to eight hours.
GLOBAL CHEMTRAIL REPORTS
Sightings of oddly lingering plumes sometimes resembling rocket trails are not confined to North American skies.
While on leave in Italy in the summer of 1999, the US Navy's Kitty Chastain sat on her hotel balcony and watched aerial
grids being laid all day just offshore over the Bay of Naples. "People were coughing all over Naples," she wrote. On the
bus ride in from the base, Chastain explained chemtrails to many sailors with hacking coughs.
On October 12 that same year, a Paris correspondent reported "...heavy activity from all directions, X upon X. The pilots
here seem to like to play chicken; they fly right at each other and then one will swerve, their trails forming pitchforks
and Xs." No contrails were being left by "normal planes" in the same skies. But the next day, planes flying over Paris
"from all directions" obscured the sky with more Xs that continued into the evening.
In Spain on April 27, 2000, American tourist John Hendricks dashed off a quick email from El Café de Internet: "Were we
surprised to see that the chemtrails are as bad here as they are anywhere, both in Mallorca and in Barcelona." He and
his wife "took plenty of pictures" before noticing a postcard they'd bought captured a perfect chemtrail.
"Add Sweden to the list," a Swedish resident wrote after spotting eight to 10 parallel 'trails and contracting flu for the
first time in years. Weather conditions at the time were not conducive to contrail formation. "I know the commercial
routes, and we have a bunch of them, but not where these trails were."
Chemtrail activity has been reported in at least 14 allied nations including Australia, Belgium, Britain, Canada, France,
Germany, Holland, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, Scotland, Sweden and the United States. Croatian chemtrails began the
day after that country joined NATO.
ATMOSPHERIC ORGANISMS
Many chemtrail observers note that chemtrails are often laid down at the leading edge of approaching frontal systems.
While rare "sundogs" form ice-crystal circles around the Sun in advance of strong winds, much more common
"chemdogs" create prismatic solar halos during stable weather.
More and more observers, like this Vancouver resident, wonder why "on the days of heavy spraying you will notice a
rainbow around the Sun". Many more people who have been healthy all their lives wonder why they keep getting
desperately sick whenever the chemplanes appear.
Unlike the refined aluminum in cooking utensils that is tenuously linked to Alzheimer's disease, aluminum oxide is as
inert as sand and is not considered toxic.
But in a story headlined "Tiny particles can kill", the August 5, 2000, edition of New Scientist reported that "city-dwellers
in Europe and the US are dying young because of microscopic particles in the air".

10. Alternative Solution to the ChemTrail Agenda
Page 10
Looking at byproducts of hydrocarbon burning, a Harvard School of Public Health team determined particulates with a
diameter less than 10 microns as being a serious threat to public health. (A human hair is about 100 microns across.) In
1987, US environmental regulations limited airborne concentrations of particles less than 10 microns in diameter.
But air pollution has grown worse. On April 21, 2001, the New York Times warned: "These microscopic motes are able to
infiltrate the tiniest compartments in the lungs and pass readily into the bloodstream, and have been most strongly tied
to illness and early death, particularly in people who are already susceptible to respiratory problems."
David Hawkins, a lawyer for the Natural Resources Defense Council, speaks for "about a quarter-million Americans who
have died prematurely as result of fine-particle exposure".
That number may be boosted sharply by chemtrail spraying. On December 14, 2000, the New England Journal of
Medicine reported that inhaling particulate matter of a size 10 microns or smaller leads to "a 5% increased death rate
within 24 hours".
Teller's sunscreen calls for spraying 10 million tons of talcum-fine reflective particulates of 10 to 100 micron sizes.
Allergic reactions to airborne fallout do not explain the entire syndrome of chemtrail-related illness. Falling blood
temperatures accompanying symptoms of intense yet feverless "flu" is a classic sign of chronic fungal infection. Blamed
for a host of auto-immune dysfunction, from chronic fatigue to fibromyalgia and multiple sclerosis, the fungus within us
also signals its presence in sharp joint pain, sudden extreme fatigue, sudden dizziness, mental confusion and short-term
memory loss.
After nearly three years of intense investigation, I have found no proof that chemtrails constitute a deliberate biological
attack. Research for my books on the Gulf biowar and earlier germ warfare experiments (Bringing The War Home;
Scorched Earth) show that bio-attacks are conducted at low level and never in daylight, in order to avoid ultraviolet
sterilisation of toxins.
The biohazards in chemtrails may be bad LUC. The "Law of Unintended Consequences" states that every human
intervention creates unpredictable consequences. Chemtrails can cause drought by soaking up all available moisture,
and drooping chemical curtains fall through vast colonies of UV-mutated bacteria, viruses and fungi living in the upper
atmosphere. Could these malevolent micro-organisms be piggy-backing on the plumes?
A series of balloon flights made in the US during the 1960s collected startling stratospheric samples swarming with
bacteria and fungi as well as viruses bigger than any known at the time.
If viruses fall from the sky, most would land in the sea. Dipping their beakers into coastal seawater, scientists found as
many as 10 million large virus-like particles per quart. As one researcher said: "No one knows where they come from or
what they do. Their size and shape match the virus-like particles found in the upper atmosphere."
Other life-forms, even tinier than bacteria, are also thriving in our atmosphere. The discoverer of nanobacteria, Dr
Robert Folk, describes the most populous organisms on Earth as "dwarf forms of bacteria, about one-tenth the diameter
and 1/1000th the volume of ordinary bacteria".
The Professor Emeritus at the University of Texas figures that these ultra-tiny bugs are "possibly an order of magnitude
more abundant" than normal bacteria that swarm everywhere.

11. Alternative Solution to the ChemTrail Agenda
Page 11
Since chemtrails are commonly spread over populated areas where temperature differentials are greatest and solar
shading most needed, it is probable that particulate-laden plumes are precipitating airborne viruses, bacteria and fungi
down into human lungs and respiratory systems unable to recognise or resist the alien invaders.
This possibility was further strengthened when Dr Folk chose a lightweight metal as a matrix to grow bugs too small to
be seen by optical microscopes. Folk viewed under electronic magnification entire ecologies of swarming nanobac. The
bacteria were feasting on (he called it "metabolising") aluminum.
PUBLIC CONCERN SPREADS
Are we worried yet? An August 2001 WorldNetDaily poll asked Americans: "Do you think 'chemtrails' are anything to
worry about?" Forty-three per cent answered "Yes"; another 30 per cent wanted more information on chemtrails--a
total 73 per cent of US respondents concerned about chemtrails.
As lawyers across the US discuss filing the "Mother of All Lawsuits" against Boeing, Bush and the US Air Force, their case
now appears tight enough to force further disclosures. The last glaring evidential gap--photos of ground-based chemtrail
operations--may soon be forthcoming.
What to do?
A British campaigner involved in another bid to reclaim individual sovereignty and local autonomy held out the best
hope for change when she told a CBC radio interviewer: "The only way to get government to do anything is if enough
people stand up and shout, 'This is ridiculous!'"
Stay tuned. With chemtrails confirmed as a military operation aimed at climate modification, the biggest trial is about to
begin--in the court of public opinion.
References
Vancouver Courier chemtrails coverage: www.vancourier.com/0 85101/news/085101nn1.html
WorldNetDaily chemtrails coverage: www.worldn etdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=24152
Mark Steadham's Houston contrails study:
www.chemtrailcentral.com/report.shtml
"Tiny Bits of Soot Tied to Illness", New York Times, April 21, 2001,
www.nytimes.com/ 2001/04/21/science/21AIR.html
NOAA meteorologist Thomas Schlatter:
www.weatherwise.org/qr/q ry.chemtrail.html
About the Author:
William Thomas specialises in health and environment issues. His award-winning writing has appeared in more than 50
publications in eight countries. His editorial commentaries have been published in The Globe and Mail, Toronto Star,

12. Alternative Solution to the ChemTrail Agenda
Page 12
Vancouver Sun and Times-Colonist newspapers as well as Earth Island Journal and Ecodecision magazines. He has also
appeared on CBC radio and TV, CNN and New Zealand national television. His articles, "Poison from the Sky: the
'Chemtrails' Crisis" and "Probing the 'Chemtrails' Conundrum", were published in NEXUS 6/03 and 7/02 respectively. He
can be contacted by email at willthomas@ telus.net , or via his Lifeboat News website, www.lifeboatnews.com.
© 2001 William Thomas Heron Rocks 1-9 Hornby Island, BC Canada V0R 1Z0 www.lifeboatnews.com
http://www.nexusmagazine.com /chemtrails.html
Extracted from Nexus Magazine,
Vol 8, No 6 (Oct-Nov 2001)
PO Box 30,
Mapleton Qld 4560 Australia.
editor@nexusmagazine.com
Telephone: +61 (0)7 5442 9280;
Fax: +61 (0)7 5442 9381
From our web page at: www.nexusmagazine.com

13. Alternative Solution to the ChemTrail Agenda
Page 13
2010 UN Ban on ChemTrail / Geo Engineering
The Consequences of Toxic Metals and Chemical Aerosols on Human Health
Dec. 6, 2010 UPDATE: Geoengineering Moratorium Agreed at UN Ministerial in Japan
By ETC Group
Risky Climate Techno-fixes Blocked
NAGOYA, Japan - In a landmark consensus decision, the 193-member UN Convention on Biological
Diversity (CBD) will close its tenth biennial meeting with a de facto moratorium on geoengineering
projects and experiments. "Any private or public experimentation or adventurism intended to manipulate
the planetary thermostat will be in violation of this carefully crafted UN consensus," stated Silvia Ribeiro,
Latin American Director of ETC Group.
The agreement, reached during the ministerial portion of the two-week meeting which included
110 environment ministers, asks governments to ensure that no geoengineering activities take
place until risks to the environmental and biodiversity and associated social, cultural and
economic impacts risks have been appropriately considered as well as the socio-economic
impacts. The CBD secretariat was also instructed to report back on various geoengineering proposals and
potential intergovernmental regulatory measures.
The unusually strong consensus decision builds on the 2008 moratorium on ocean fertilization. That
agreement, negotiated at COP 9 in Bonn, put the brakes on a litany of failed "experiments" - both public
and private - to sequester atmospheric carbon dioxide in the oceans' depths by spreading nutrients on the
sea surface. Since then, attention has turned to a range of futuristic proposals to block a percentage of
solar radiation via large-scale interventions in the atmosphere, stratosphere and outer space that would
alter global temperatures and precipitation patterns.
"This decision clearly places the governance of geoengineering in the United Nations where it belongs,"
said ETC Group Executive Director Pat Mooney.
"This decision is a victory for common sense, and for precaution. It will not inhibit legitimate scientific
research. Decisions on geoengineering cannot be made by small groups of scientists from a small group
of countries that establish self-serving 'voluntary guidelines' on climate hacking. What little credibility
such efforts may have had in some policy circles in the global North has been shattered by this decision.
The UK Royal Society and its partners should cancel their Solar Radiation Management

14. Alternative Solution to the ChemTrail Agenda
Page 14
Governance Initiative and respect that the world's governments have collectively decided that
future deliberations on geoengineering should take place in the UN, where all countries have a
seat at the table and where civil society can watch and influence what they are doing."
Delegates in Nagoya have now clearly understood the potential threat that deployment - or
even field testing - of geoengineering technologies poses to the protection of biodiversity. The
decision was hammered out in long and difficult late night sessions of a "Friends of the chair" group,
attended by ETC Group, and adopted by the Working Group 1 Plenary on 27 October 2010. The Chair of
the climate and biodiversity negotiations called the final text "a highly delicate compromise." All that
remains to do now is gavel it through in the final plenary at 6 PM Friday (Nagoya time).
"The decision is not perfect," said Neth Dano of ETC Group Philippines. "Some delegations are
understandably concerned that the interim definition of geoengineering is too narrow because it does not
include Carbon Capture and Storage technologies. Before the next CBD meeting, there will be ample
opportunity to consider these questions in more detail. But climate techno-fixes are now firmly on the UN
agenda and will lead to important debates as the 20th anniversary of the Earth Summit approaches. A
change of course is essential, and geoengineering is clearly not the way forward."
The Consequences of Toxic Metals and Chemical Aerosols on Human Health
by Dr. Ilya Sandra Perlingieri
For decades, we have known that heavy metals and chemicals can cause grave physical harm. Going back
to Rachel Carson's "Silent Spring," we have known and been amply warned of the serious consequences of
using or being exposed to these poisons in our daily activities. Thousands of these are well-documented
carcinogens.
Building on Carson's ground-breaking research, we also know that certain kinds of chemicals can and do
disrupt human [and other animals'] entire immune system. Going back 30 years, researchers were
investigating what became known as endocrine [hormone] disrupting chemicals and how they were
affecting frogs [who sometimes had five legs or hermaphroditic characteristics], other aquatic animals,
and mammals. These animals were the proverbial canaries in the coal mine.
In another pioneering book, "Our Stolen Future," authors Dr. Theo Colburn, Dianne Dumanoski, and John
Peterson Myers clearly demonstrate that 1 + 1 hormone-disrupting chemicals did not equal 2. Rather, in a
nightmare of mathematical proportions, these poisons acted synergistically; and 1+1 could equal up to
1,600 times the original dose. We are also exposed to more than 100,000 chemicals regularly. Most of
them have never been tested for human safety. So, almost nothing has been done to reduce human
exposure to a myriad of hazardous chemicals. In fact, over the past decade, the Bush administration
dismantled many environmental laws in existence for 30 years, to let corporations off the proverbial hook.
[Just look at what's unfolding in the Gulf with the BP oil spill.]
Although this information, on the dangers of hormone disruption, is now more widely available on Internet
sites, it still is not well known by the average person who gets news mostly from mainstream media.(1)
Most of these highly toxic chemicals are invisible; and, therefore, are easily off our collective radar. With
the high stress level created by the deliberately orchestrated financial crisis -where millions have lost their
jobs and homes- a degraded/collapsing environment or serious health problems are not priorities -
especially, if very little is reported in mainstream news.

15. Alternative Solution to the ChemTrail Agenda
Page 15
This disaster scenario is part of the larger picture of what Naomi Klein writes about in her book "The Shock
Doctrine." We have so many major crises, one after another, that it is hard just to keep up with one's
daily routine -let alone have time to read and consider the toxicological health ramifications of massive
amounts of thousands of heavy metals and chemicals that have poisoned our entire food chain and, thus,
our own supposed "health." We are at the very top of this wrecked food chain.
Now, however, there is another far more insidious layer of toxicity that is not being addressed at all in any
mainstream, corporate-controlled news, and it is affecting our very survival. It is, however, being
addressed more and more by independent researchers who have supporting evidence to back up their
Internet reports.
For more than a decade, first the United States and then Canada's citizens have been subjected to a
24/7/365 day aerosol assault over our heads made of a toxic brew of poisonous heavy metals, chemicals,
and other dangerous ingredients. None of this was reported by any mainstream media. The US
Department of Defense [DOD] and military have been systematically blanketing all our skies with what are
known as Chemtrails (also known as Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering).(2) These differ vastly from
the usual plane contrails that evaporate rather quickly in the sky. Chemtrails do not dissipate.
Rather, planes (fitted with special nozzles) release aerosols "lines" in the sky that do not
evaporate.
Multiple planes are deployed, flying parallel (or often "checkerboard" patterns) overhead; and
soon the sky is blanketed with many grayish-white lines [miles and miles long, although this is
changing]. At first, these lines are thin; but soon they expand and, in a short time, merge
together. Our once-blue sky has vanished and has been replaced by a grayish-white toxic haze
that blots out and greatly diminishes our usual sunshine.
CHEMTRAILS / Geo Engineering:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WtV-udSNtW0
Military and commercial planes are involved in more than 60 secret operations. Last year, when I flew
across the country, I saw a United Airlines jet (flying below us at about 37,000 feet) spraying a black
aerosol that went for miles and miles across the sky. This clandestine program now includes aerosol-
spraying planes in North America, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand [all NATO countries]. Hundreds (if
not thousands) of people have called and written their public officials to get answers. Replies from US and
Canadian officials are not forthcoming; or, if they do reply, queries are dismissed.
This remains an ongoing, deliberate cover-up. No one is held accountable, while we continued to be
poisoned daily. This is not the first time, however, that citizens are being used as experimental laboratory
test subjects. The US government and its military have a very long and sordid history of using us, without
informed consent, in this illegal manner. As Carole Pellatt notes:
The U.S. military has been spraying chemical and biological weapons in open air testing over civilian
populations since the 1940's. They are called "vulnerability tests". This is not a controversial statement.
The military has admitted to this practice on many occasions and there's plenty of documentation from the
government to corroborate it. There is also documentation of intentional, experimental releases of
radiation on civilian populations. Unfortunately, this information tends to surface long after it could have
saved lives, or eased the suffering of victims.(3)
Over the past decade, independent testing of Chemtrails around the country has shown a
dangerous, extremely poisonous brew that includes: barium, nano aluminum-coated fiberglass
[known as CHAFF], radioactive thorium, cadmium, chromium, nickel, desiccated blood, mold
spores, yellow fungal mycotoxins, ethylene dibromide, and polymer fibers. Barium can be
compared to the toxicity of arsenic.(4) Barium is known to adversely affect the heart. Aluminum has a
history of damaging brain function. Independent researchers and labs continue to show off-the-scale
levels of these poisons. A few "anonymous" officials have acknowledged this on-going aerosol spraying.(5)

16. Alternative Solution to the ChemTrail Agenda
Page 16
Numerous tests have been done to verify that these poisons are off the scale in their toxicity.
They are documented in our water, in our soil, and in our air. For more than 10 years, researcher
Clifford Carnicom has been valiantly and systematically reporting on the various detrimental aspects of
these aerosols -and what they are doing to our entire environment, as well as our blood.(6) Various "sky
watch" groups also have been carefully documenting and diligently reporting about these daily
assaults.(7)
With all these poisons surrounding our every breath, it is not surprising to see a dramatic increase in
illnesses. There are numerous reports of the increase in cardiac deaths and upper respiratory illnesses
(asthma, chronic bronchitis, lung cancer, and often multiple chronic illnesses). Chemtrails toxicity has
already dramatically affected our deteriorating "collective health." The significant increase in heart disease
and various upper respiratory illnesses has been linked to a vast increase in "particulate matter" in our air.
This can be seen by some revealing statistics:
1. Coronary heart disease is now the leading cause of death in the US. According to the CDC, in 2006,
631,636 died of heart disease. This means 1 out of every 5 Americans are affected.(8)
In Canada, every seven minutes someone dies of heart disease.(9)
2. Asthma and upper respiratory illnesses. Between 100-150 million people suffer from asthma worldwide.
In the US, 16.4 million adults have asthma and 7 million children have it. Chronic bronchitis and
emphysema: 9.8 million Americans were diagnosed with chronic bronchitis this past year; for emphysema
the figure is 3.8 million.(10) Total: 37 million Americans afflicted.
In Canada, 2.4 million have been diagnosed with asthma.
3. Particulate matter in air pollution. Particulate matter [PM] consists of tiny particles 10 microns or less.
[1 micron is about 1/70 the thickness of a single human hair.] These particles can lodge in the deepest
part of your lungs; and over a period of time, they can damage lung function. This kind of pollution, that
we breathe daily, can and does cause various upper respiratory illnesses, coronary heart disease, and
premature aging and death. Particulate matter can also exacerbate any existing illness.(11) Unanswered
questions: Does hazardous particulate matter act in synergistic ways in human bodies (as do endocrine
disrupting chemicals)? How does PM affect millions who already have multiple chronic illnesses?
Brain Injury
Even with the increases in preventable illnesses, the issue that has not been linked or addressed -with
what Clifford Carnicom rightly calls "aerosol crimes"- is the deterioration of cognitive function. Our
immune system is already under siege daily; and this has resulted in millions (possibly billions) of people
with not just one illness, but often multiple ones. The skin, the largest organ in our body, is a permeable
membrane. This means that invisible toxins in our air, including Chemtrails and other highly dangerous
chemicals, go right into our skin. Poisoned rainwater (or snow touching our skin) does the same thing.
When the air we breathe is filled with a dangerous assortment of toxins, with each breath we take, these
poisons assault our entire immune system. These poisons also affect our brain and, thus, our cognitive
function.
Aluminum is a major component in these aerosols. Although it is our planet's most abundant metal, our
body has no biological need for it. Pesticide Action Network North America [PANNA] lists it as "toxic to
humans, including carcinogenicity, reproductive and developmental toxicity, neurotoxicity, and acute
toxicity."(12) Yet, aluminum is commonly used [this is a very short list] in vaccines, deodorants and anti-
perspirants, over-the-counter medications, soft drink and beer cans [aluminum leeches from the cans],
baking powder, cake mixes, processed cheeses, and other food products and additives.

17. Alternative Solution to the ChemTrail Agenda
Page 17
Over years, aluminum accumulates in the brain, tissues, and to a lesser amount the bones. It causes brain
degeneration, dysfunction and damage -due to the blockage and reduced blood flow and oxygen of brain
arteries. The brain shrinks, as brain cells die. This causes dementia. Symptoms include: emotional
outbursts, paranoia, forgetfulness and memory loss, speech incoherence, irritability, diminished alertness,
changes in personality, and poor/bad judgment. All these are on the rise, as more than 4-million
Americans are afflicted.
Brain deterioration and dementia take decades to cause serious and visible harm. Eventually, however,
dementia is fatal. "Alzheimer's" is now being used incorrectly as a catch-all term for all kinds of dementia.
Just a few days ago, the front page of the New York Times had a headline: "More with Dementia Wander
from Home."(13)
People afflicted with, what the Times terms "Alzheimer's" were interviewed. One person mentioned he
"has a diagnosis of Alzheimer's." This is patently wrong. Alzheimer's dementia can only be accurately
diagnosed after death when a post-mortem can be done. However, heavy metals poisoning can be
diagnosed through lab testing; but this is rarely done for basic check-ups.
What is not addressed in this increase in dementia is the more than 10 years of breathing Chemtrails with
nano aluminum-coated fiberglass. Billions of tons have been sprayed on us.
With all these sources of aluminum added to the air we breathe with each breath, the cumulative toxicity
is very high. Even in daily events, it is obvious -to anyone who is paying attention- that many people are
behaving oddly. While it may be considered "anecdotal" reporting, there are millions of people whose
behavior is strange. There have been numerous times in just the past year when I have asked someone a
question and received an answer that is totally unrelated. There have been more and more uncontrolled
outbursts in public areas: someone "snaps" for no apparent reason. Violence levels are up. Look at all the
shootings on school campuses. There are more unexplained auto accidents that never should have
happened. In just one day a few weeks ago, I witnessed three traffic accidents that need not have
happened.
The news is full of these stories.
Add to this already highly toxic body burden is the US military's use of aluminum in its aerosols. It is used
because of its electrical conductivity, durability, and light weight. The US Air Force reported in 1997 that it
released "2 million, 6-7 ounce bundles of CHAFF." These are laid by military aircraft form 15-50 miles in
length.(14) Another unanswered question: Why is the USAF not releasing up-to-date figures?
A 2002 report notes that: "over the last 25 years, the US Navy [has released from planes] several
hundred thousand pounds of aluminized chaff during flight operations over a training area on the
Chesapeake Bay."(15) If the Navy used hundreds of thousands of pounds in just this small area of the US,
what could be extrapolated for the release of possibly billions of tons of nano aluminum by all the military
divisions throughout the US and Canada more recently than 2002? CHAFF is being stored that has lead in
it. Has that been released, without our knowledge, and added to these aerosols? What enormous, yet
invisible, harm has that created for all of us?
Dr. Hildegarde Staninger reported last year that "exposure to aerial emissions of nano composite
materials resulted in cholinesterase inhibition."(16) The human body has three kinds of cholinesterase: for
the brain, for plasma (manufactured by the liver), and red blood cells. Some pesticides and nerve gases
(such as VX, an organophosphate) inhibit cholinesterase. The chronic inhibition of this enzyme (that
normally circulates in red blood cells), caused by the spraying of these Chemtrails aerosols [for weather
modification, but also used for mosquito and other insect eradication], causes chronic poisoning. This
exposure causes severe neurological disorders, including paralysis in humans.

18. Alternative Solution to the ChemTrail Agenda
Page 18
In a ground-breaking 2003 online essay, Dr. Kaye Kilburn, asks: "Why is Chemical Brain Injury
Ignored?"(17) His article lists 13 concealed factors that affect our willingness to believe that dangerous
chemicals do affect the brain.
They include:
1. "It's all in your head" [meaning real symptoms are ignored by allopathic medicine].
2. Resistance to vulnerability [individuals, and society collectively, cannot believe the brain is at risk].
3. The acceptance of mind-altering prescription drugs [such as Paxil] that can and do affect the brain
[millions are on anti-depressants -what long-term damage does that also do to cognitive thinking?].
4. Chemical brain injury is considered not to be "an imminent threat."
5. Competition from other serious threats [causing indifference or denial];
6. Delay in acknowledging health risks.
7. Economic interests [delaying tactics by big corporations are well known -delay continues profits and
ignores taking responsibility -We are all expendable for corporate profits].
8. The field of neurology has been slow to consider causes [how many independent researchers are left
who do not have any ties to the pharmaceutical/chemical companies?].
In all these valuable reasons for not addressing this human crisis, the one that Dr. Kilburn has not
addressed directly is the chronic assault of breathing/absorbing these now billions of tons of hazardous
aerosolized chemicals and heavy metals over more than a decade without our informed consent. When
one does not look for or address primary causes, then other issues can be blamed. This, on top of a
government's silence or refusal to respond and the corporate media's complicity, make for an extremely
dangerous combination that puts us all at grave and daily risk. As brain function is diminished, and other
things are blamed for it, any population is easier "to control."
Dr. Kiburn's research clearly shows that chemicals do affect and seriously harm the brain [and, thereby,
cognitive function]. Chemicals -especially a daily onslaught of toxic chemicals over many years- can
damage our ability to think clearly. Even if we find this hard to believe, the evidence is there. Dr. Kilburn
has expanded this essay into the first book to research this: "Chemical Brain Injury" (published in 1998).
Dr. Kilburn notes:
The brain's preservation represents the only possibility of survival for mankind. To find in many parts of
the country and in many individual patients that its function is eroded seriously by chemicals, chemicals
that have been introduced into the environment basically in the last 50 years, is bad news indeed.(18)
It seems almost unbelievable that millions/billions of people could look up at the sky and not notice the
dramatic changes that have occurred from what it was, for instance, in the mid-1990s. Then our sky was
a gorgeous, deep blue. Clouds were a beautiful assortment of shapes. The sun was glorious. But people
under 30, may not have a real sense of recollection about looking up every day and seeing this panoramic
magnificence. Most of them are too busy texting or chatting on their cell phones. There are other issues to
consider, as well: People are in their own comfort zones; and denial is a very powerful human emotion. In
the hustle and bustle (now quite out of hand, for reflective time), how many people look up at the sky? It
also takes huge courage, a very deep, internal willingness to examine politically motivated corporate
controlled media spin, and search for the real answers.
Humans like their regular routines. To re-examine what we think we know, based on new evidence, takes
a willingness to think outside the proverbial box; to want to find out the truth -not the pervasive Orwellian

19. Alternative Solution to the ChemTrail Agenda
Page 19
doublespeak that pervades our society. If everything in our daily routine belies what is truly going on, it
requires fortitude to explore the unknown -to question the litany.
Another courageous person is Dr. R. Michael Castle who continues to address the Chemtrails toxicity
issue. He is a noted polymer chemist who has been interviewed frequently and has written articles about
the extreme hazards of Chemtrails. Dr. Castle has also written a ground-breaking document, the Universal
Atmospheric Preservation Act [UAPA]. This document has been in Congress since 2008; but is tied up in
committee. The only way to have this vital piece of legislation passed is to have real congressional
representatives actually representing us (instead of the corporate lobbyists).
See:
http://anticcorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/22010/04/the-unified-atmospheric-preservation-act.pdf
Given these issues, since our collapsing society has so many different levels of deceit -the financial
debacle, the lies and deceit of government and the Federal Reserve blaming people for the
housing/mortgage nightmare, the emerging police state, the disasters that envelope our fragile
environment- it becomes increasingly difficult just to maintain a daily routine and survive the economic
depression and its daily fallout.
Mainstream media does its supporting role and deceives us. Millions, like the proverbial lemmings, hasten
to join the group demise. There are countless historical instances of this collective insanity. We Homo
sapiens [sic, wise men?] have never learned the lessons of 5,000 years of history. This is because each
new generation of corrupt political leaders (often tied historically to previous ones) never has the real
interest of their constituents as a basic part of their political practice. Further, there is no Precautionary
Principle in place.(19) It's not the way the political game of deception works. Precaution is not part of an
equation that is broken from the beginning. Humans are gullible and want to believe the Orwellian
deceptions.
To add to this already heavy burden, to ask uninformed, although supposedly "well educated" [What does
that actually mean, given that much of our higher education has omitted much of what Prof. Peter Dale
Scott calls "deep political events" that never get into our history books?] people to reconsider what they
think they know about what is really going on -this takes enormous internal strength. It requires profound
courage. The basis of this "courage" actually means creating new synaptical pathways in the brain.
Without them, we feel scared, nervous...because those new synapses have not yet been created. It takes
repeated effort, and, thus, an emerging sense of ease, to create these new synapses.
If, however, millions of people are already on prescription pharmaceuticals to "calm them down" [long
term, what is this doing to their ability to think clearly?] and, in addition, are breathing poisoned air rife
with mind-distorting chemicals, then how clearly (if at all) is anyone able to think? How can anyone feel
well and safe, if the very air we breathe is deliberately poisoned and is affecting our ability to think
cogently? It is already evident that no one in any official capacity is willing to tell the truth. It is like
Diogenes, the ancient Greek, searching for a truthful individual. No one seems to have the desire, or
courage, or authority to stop this massive poisoning, because it is the secret plan of the elite insiders to
deliberate destroy everything we once knew.
Our BASIC human rights, constitutional and international laws are mere paper. These rights and laws have
all been torn asunder by those in charge. It has been done by stealth. We must organize peacefully.
PEACEFULLY is the operative word. If these many-pronged aerosol attacks by military and commercial
planes can spray these horrific toxins on us, year after year with impunity -against all laws- then it is
absolutely imperative that we organize peacefully. As Peter Dale Scott notes in Jason Bermas' new DVD
"Invisible Empire": we must use the Internet and our peaceful intellectual powers to come together and
shut this nightmare down. It is possible to do this.
Dr. Ilya Sandra Perlingieri is author of the highly acclaimed book, "The Uterine Crisis."

20. Alternative Solution to the ChemTrail Agenda
Page 20
Notes
1. See: www.ourstolenfuture.org
2. See Michael J. Murphy. "What in the World Are They Spraying?" March 3, 2010:
www.countercurrents.org/murphy030310.htm ; and G. Edward Griffin. "Chemtrail vs. Contrail" April 14,
2010: www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsWpSPBwA-w
3. Carole Pellatt. Connections. "What's going on in the air? Yes, we are being sprayed." Aug. 8m 2007:
http://homepage.mac.com/carolepellatt/yeswearebeingsprayed ; and
http://homepage.mac.com/carolepellatt/MATRIX/INDEXCHEMTRAILS.html
4. See Pesticide Action Network North America [PANNA]:
http://www.pesticideinfo.org/Detail_Chemical.jsp?Rec_Id=PC41174
5. March 12, 2010:
www.lightwatcher.com/chemtrails/text/faa_confirms_Chemtrails. An interesting conference at the
University of California, San Diego [UCSD], "Atmospheric Aerosols: Health, Environment, and Climate
Effects" addresses some of the cardio-vascular increases due to "atmospheric aerosols" but these
academics never use the word Chemtrails. Yet, satellite photos they show clearly indicate the atmospheric
impact of Chemtrails. See: Jan. 31, 2008: UCSD: www.youtube.com/watch?v=ztHV5RF-xyw
6. For numerous detailed reports, see: www.carnicom.com; www.carnicominstitute.org;
www.bariumblues.com; and Dr. Marijah McCain. "Chemtrails and Barium Toxicity." April 6, 2002:
www.rense.com/general21/tox.htm ; Material Safety Data Sheet, University of Utah:
www.chemtrails911.com/docs/bariumhealth.htm. This last cited website is very outdated. It does not
address the increased amounts of barium now found in our air. Additional info: "Local News Station
Confirms Barium in Chemtrails." Nov. 10, 2007: www.youtube.com/watch?v=okB-489l6MI
7. See: www.newyorkskywatch.com; www.californiaskywatch.com ; www.arizonaskywatch.com
8. Heart Disease Facts. CDC; www.cdc.gov/heartdisease/facts.htm
9. www.heartandstroke.com/site/c.ikIQLcMWJtE/b.3483991/k.34A8/Statistics.htm#heartdisease
10. Asthma. CDC: www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/asthma.htm; and chronic bronchitis and emphysema: CDC:
www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/copd.htm
11. Rosalind Peterson's report: "The impacts of air pollution on health."
www.californiaskywatch.com/health_issues.htm
12. PANNA: www.pesticideinfo.org/Detail_Chemical.jsp?Rec_Id=PC33881
13. May 4, 2010: www.nytimes.com/2010/05/05/us/05search.html?hpw
14. [14. See: Rosalind Peterson. "Public and federal agencies concerned about the potentially harmful or
undesirable effects of chaff on the environment."
www.californiaskywatch.com/documents/htmldocs/chaff_goa_dod.htm]
15. "Effects of Navy chaff release on aluminum levels in an area of the Chesapeake Bay." PubMed. US
National Library of Medicine. June 2002: www.ncbi.nl.nih.gov/pubmed/12061831
16. Sept. 7, 2009: www.hildegarde-staninger.com/exposure-to-aerial-emissions-html

21. Alternative Solution to the ChemTrail Agenda
Page 21
17. Kaye H. Kilburn. "Why is Chemical Brain Injury Ignored. Pondering Causes and Risks." Editorial.
Archives of Environmental Health. March 1, 2003: www.mindfully.org/Health/2003/Chemical-Brain-
Injury1mar03.htm
18. www.neuro-test.com/aboutKilburn/aboutKilburn.html
19. Dr. Ilya Sandra Perlingieri. "Worldwide Environmental Crisis. Gone Missing: The Precautionary
Principle." Global Research. Feb. 11, 2009: www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=12268
HOW TO SOLVE
THE TOXIC GLOBAL CHEMTRAIL AGENDA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mEfJO0-cTis http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jf0khstYDLA
The overt rational for global Geo Engineering / toxic ChemTrail spraying is
Global Warming reduction.
The covert rational is weather modification, population reduction and
forcing GMO seeds onto farmers.
Two peaceful energy solutions now exist to remove the overt rational.

22. Alternative Solution to the ChemTrail Agenda
Page 22
Regenerative Acceleration (ReGenX) Electric Generator NRC Test Set-up
Diagram 1.0 ReGenX Generator Coil and Conventional Generator Coil Set-Up
2009 Test Data from NRC Scientist Doug Hartwich: https://www.box.net/s/kqo8knpgk7femc0jldnz
2009 Test Video – Conventional Generator Armature Reaction vs ReGenX Generator Armature Reaction:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IgHFhNMkDiw&list=PLkH1zLdXy1SypPD7inxAYi8MjkQk91syC&index=1

23. Alternative Solution to the ChemTrail Agenda
Page 23
Test Goals and Methodology 2009 Conventional Generator vs ReGenX Generator:
The Doug Hartwich ReGenX test goals were focused on recording the conventional generator’s armature reaction and
the ReGenX generator’s armature reaction at identical no-load input motor speeds to ensure that;
1. The drive shaft torque was identical in both cases and,
2. The motor efficiency was identical in both cases.
2009 Test Observations
Line 4:
The no-load speed was set at roughly 2100 RPM and the input and output values recorded.
Line 5:
When the conventional generator coil was loaded through a 10 ohm load delivering 1.26 Watts to the load – the
system decelerated as expected and the prime mover input power had to be increased by 12.3% (row H) to maintain
the system speed of 2100 RPM and steady state continuous power through the load.
Line 7:
When the Regenerative Acceleration Generator (ReGenX) Coils were engaged the system accelerated as expected and
the prime mover input power had to be reduced by 40.2% to maintain the same steady state speed of roughly 2100
RPM.
It was observed and recorded that the ReGenX generator delivered 223.8% more power to the same 10 ohm load at
the same 2100 RPM steady state speed (row H) but with a 40.2% reduction in input power required to do so.
Line 9:
When the ReGenX coils were removed and the system was allowed to operate in conventional generator mode with
the same 40.2% input reduction as in Line 7, the result was that the conventional generator coil decelerated the
system down to a dead stop while the input to the prime mover increased by 35% in a failed attempt to prevent
system deceleration.
The ReGenX generator delivered a continuous 4.08 Watts to the load with a 40% reduction in prime mover input
power (from Line 5) at a steady state speed of 2100 RPM – while the conventional generator delivered a continuous
0.0 Watts to the same load with a 35% increase in prime mover input at a steady state speed of 0 RPM.
Performance advantage: ReGenX Generator Output / Conventional Generator Output x 100
4.08/0.0 x 100
= infinite%
Performance advantage ReGenX Generator vs Conventional Generator = Infinite%

24. Alternative Solution to the ChemTrail Agenda
Page 24
Line 11
When the ReGenX generator was allowed to accelerate itself without reducing the input (by 40.2%) to maintain
identical steady state speeds as per Line 7 the system accelerated to the full speed of the prime mover/motor and the
generator output increased to 16.1 Watts while the input power dropped by 62% from the initial no-load setting.
When the ReGenX coil was then removed the system decelerated down to a virtual dead stop with the generator
output equaling 0.001 Watts.
Performance advantage ReGenX Generator vs Conventional Generator = 1,610,000%
2009 Test Conclusions
The conventional generator coil creates an electromagnetically induced counter-torque/ armature reaction
which decelerates the system when placed on-load and additional power must be returned to the input to
maintain steady state power to the load.
The more power delivered to the load in the conventional generator paradigm - the more power must be
returned to keep the system running. The amount of power returned always exceeds the amount of power
delivered due to losses in the system.
The Regenerative Acceleration Generator coil on the other hand creates an electromagnetically induced
complimentary-torque/ armature reaction which accelerates the system when placed on-load and a
reduction in power must be delivered to the input if a fixed steady state power and speed are desired.
The more power delivered to the load in the ReGenX generator paradigm - the less power must be returned
to keep the system running. The discharging magnetic flux from the ReGenX coils also does two beneficial
things simultaneously 1) It accelerates the rotor and negates the conventional coil armature reaction 2) It
adds to the permanent magnet rotor flux being delivered to the conventional coil’s core and supplements
the conventional coil’s power by an additional 15%.
Overall ReGenX Generator Innovation Performance Advantage over Conventional Generators
At any steady state speed with a fixed prime mover input the conventional generator will always
decelerate the system down to a dead stop if the load is great enough – whereas the ReGenX generator will
never decelerate the system and the performance advantage will always = infinity.
Thane C. Heins
President & CEO
Potential +/- Difference Inc. R & D
"Change catalysts using our potential to make a positive difference"
Email: thaneh@potentialdifference.ca
Cell: 613.795.1602
YOUTUBE http://www.youtube.com/user/pdicanada1
LinkedInihttp://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=107557432&trk=tab_pro
slideshare http://www.slideshare.net/ThaneCHeins

25. Alternative Solution to the ChemTrail Agenda
Page 25
Technology Endorsements & Industry Comments
"As a mechanical engineer I'm here to explain how it works and why it works. And it does
work; over a dozen of us were witness to that last Monday (as well as a film crew--filming in
3D no less!)."
-Mike Brace, Tech Editor EV World (2012)
"This is the holy grail for generators."
-NRC Scientist Doug Hartwick at Ottawa University (2009)
"This is a freakin' game changer!"
-Mike Elwood, Chairman Electric Mobility Canada at Ottawa University (2009)
"Of course it accelerates when a load is applied...! This represents several new chapters in
physics, that is why we are consulting MIT."
-Dr. Habash, University of Ottawa (2007)
"It works and it is not something I would have expected, now I am just trying to figure it out?"
-Dr. Marcus Zahn at MIT (2007)
"A number of your experiments are not lying in the field of Maxwellian electrodynamics? That
is fascinating! I will inform you on any progress that i'll make along with reports."
-Dr. Evstigneev N.M., leading sc., dep. of chaotic dynamics, Institute for System
analysis, Russian Academy of Science. (2009)
"Your claims seem to violate the law of conservation of energy and Maxwell's equations of
electro-magnetics." I will send you a short proposal, including my plan of work, estimate of
cost, etc. Then we can sign a short agreement and proceed."
-Mehrdad (Mark) Ehsani, Ph.D., P.E., F.IEEE, F.SAE, Robert M. Kennedy Professor &
Director, Power Electronics and Motor Drives Laboratory & Advanced Vehicle Systems
Research Program, Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Texas A&M
University
"This is absolutely fascinating stuff you are doing!"
-Joseph Shin, Electricity and Magnetism Professor, Concordia University (2011)
"If possible would like to meet with you to discuss your approach to the Association and of
course to get a better feel about the physics behind your invention. I would still like to see
what you are doing and perhaps we can include some of your material on our website
newsletter?"
-David Mann, Canadian Association for the Advancement of Science (2009)

26. Alternative Solution to the ChemTrail Agenda
Page 26
"Thane, Your Press Release was most interesting to me as a physicist & an engineer. The
level of technical detail was adequate to tell me that you probably have made a very
significant advance in applied physics & in safely and successfully handling a new source of
electric power. Congratulations!"
-Dr. Stanley Townsend, University of Toronto & Former Managing Editor of the
Canadian Journal of Physics (2006)
"We are interested in using the ReGenX technology in our LinkVolt Project to reduce roadside
refueling."
-Neil Young, LincVolt Project (2011)
"The magnetics lab here at Goddard expressed some interest in having you come down to do
a colloquium."
-NASA (2008)
"We really are more interested in developing its use and application for military power
requirements."
-US Air Force (2009)
"I have asked Mr. Gilles Brassard, A/Director, Spacecraft Payload here at the Canadian
Space Agency to look at your technologies and to visit your laboratory."
-Canadian Space Agency (2009)
"I am writing to ask you to submit what you feel would be an appropriate document to
describe your regenerative acceleration technology for circulation to our Committee
members."
-Al Cormier, Executive Director Electric Mobility Canada (2009)
"You seem to have made an interesting discovery. Our internal physics experts review this
information and have determined that it is very interesting work."
-Mike Simpson, Transportation Analyst Rocky Mountain Institute (2009)
"Would you be willing to contribute an article on this technology to the Journal for Engineering
and Public Policy?"
-Donald Wallace, Executive Director Ontario Centre for Engineering and Public Policy
(2009)
"Thanks for providing technical information. If the effect of your invention is really true, I am
sure there will be strong needs in the market."
-Nissan Japan (2012)

27. Alternative Solution to the ChemTrail Agenda
Page 27
"I would like to know why you are not the toast of the town... this technology can be offered as
a range extension option to our clients."
-Thomas Fritz, Vice President Electric Vehicle Operations, CODA Automotive (2012)
"The technology looks really interesting and is revolutionary. I would like to learn more about
the technology. Is it possible to organize a demo or a lecture in the USA?"
-Chrysler Electrified Powertrains (2012)
"This sounds interesting. I'd like you to connect with our Fuel Economy Learning Program
manager, to schedule a time for you to come in and share the technology with us. We need to
know more about the Physics behind it."
-General Motors (2012)
"It would be fitting for the inventor of the automobile to be first with your revolutionary
technology and for me to play a role in that would be awesome!"
-Mercedes-Benz (2012)
"When we finally understand what Thane Heins has discovered, we likely will have to rewrite
the laws of electromagnetism."
-Mike Brace EV World Tech Editor (2010)
“There is no energy crisis, food crisis or environmental crisis.
There is only a crisis of ignorance.”
--- R. Buckminster Fuller