From the SMX Advanced Conference in Seattle, Washington, June 22-23, 2016. SESSION: The Periodic Table of SEO Ranking Factors: 2016 Edition. PRESENTATION: Deconstructing the Gospel of Rankings - Given by Leslie To, @itsleslieto - 3Q Digital, Director of SEO. #SMX #11A
2. #SMX #11A @itsleslieto
And Me
• About me:
• Director of SEO
• Responsible for SEO strategy on all clients
• About 3Q Digital:
• Over $400 million in annual managed spend
on Google
• Search, SEO, mobile, paid social, display,
creative and analytics
17. #SMX #11A @itsleslieto
CTR is related to meta descriptions and has been thought
to impact rankings. Does it really?
-
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
2.50%
2.60%
2.70%
2.80%
2.90%
3.00%
3.10%
3.20%
3.30%
AveragePosition
CTR
*CTR Avg. Position
18. #SMX #11A @itsleslieto
CTR is related to meta descriptions and has been thought
to impact rankings. Does it really?
-
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
2.50%
2.60%
2.70%
2.80%
2.90%
3.00%
3.10%
3.20%
3.30%
AveragePosition
CTR
*CTR Avg. Position
19. #SMX #11A @itsleslieto
CTR is related to meta descriptions and has been thought
to impact rankings. Does it really?
2/28 3/6 3/13 3/20 3/27 4/3 4/10 4/17 4/24 5/1 5/8 5/15 5/22 5/29
*CTR 3.08% 3.03% 2.91% 3.09% 3.22% 3.24% 3.24% 3.20% 3.15% 3.03% 2.96% 2.91% 2.81% 2.87%
Avg.
Position
10.08 9.38 9.15 9.47 9.00 8.55 8.86 8.90 9.12 9.67 9.59 9.78 10.29 10.09
+0.33% points
-0.29 positions
-0.16% points
+0.42 positions
25. #SMX #11A @itsleslieto
Website #1:
• DA 77/100
• Sample of 79
URLs
No discernable
relationship
between word
count & avg.
position
Is there a diminishing return on content investment?
26. #SMX #11A @itsleslieto
Website #2:
• DA 36/100
• Sample of 52
URLs
Negative
correlation between
avg. position &
word count
Is there a diminishing return on content investment?
27. #SMX #11A @itsleslieto
Website #3:
• DA 46/100
• Sample of 1,006
URLs
Biggest cluster
between 500 and
600 words
Is there a diminishing return on content investment?
33. #SMX #11A @itsleslieto
Explicit Targeting Implied Meanings
“mobile best practices” à
“top ranking factors” à
“why manual bidding” à
“pivot tables” à
“improve content reach on facebook” à
Explicit vs Implicit Targeting
“ways to optimize for mobile”
“how to improve organic visibility”
“automated vs manual bidding”
“how to create pivot tables”
“why does some content get more reach
than other content”
40. #SMX #11A @itsleslieto
• As RankBrain gets better at interpreting searches, the pool of
total keyword permutations will shrink (slowly…)
Why should you care how RankBrain is interpreting
searches?
41. #SMX #11A @itsleslieto
• As RankBrain gets better at interpreting searches, the pool of
total keyword permutations will shrink (slowly…)
• Because of this, you’ll also have to get better at figuring out
implied meanings of keyword searches in order to take
advantage of RankBrain’s conflating abilities
Why should you care how RankBrain is interpreting
searches?
42. #SMX #11A @itsleslieto
• As RankBrain gets better at interpreting searches, the pool of
total keyword permutations will shrink (slowly…)
• Because of this, you’ll also have to get better at figuring out
implied meanings of keyword searches in order to take
advantage of RankBrain’s conflating abilities
• Even though it’s the “third most important ranking factor”, it’s
unclear how we can optimize towards it
Why should you care how RankBrain is interpreting
searches?
43. #SMX #11A @itsleslieto
• As RankBrain gets better at interpreting searches, the pool of
total keyword permutations will shrink (slowly…)
• Because of this, you’ll also have to get better at figuring out
implied meanings of keyword searches in order to take
advantage of RankBrain’s conflating abilities
• Even though it’s the “third most important ranking factor”, it’s
unclear how we can optimize towards it
• Understanding how it works gets us one step closer to being able to use
it to our advantage
Why should you care how RankBrain is interpreting
searches?