1. AbstractAbstract
Design of Automated Cut Guide for Orthopedic SurgeryDesign of Automated Cut Guide for Orthopedic Surgery
Sean Campbell (EE), Pavla Pletkova (EE), Jenna Ross (ME), Brad SSean Campbell (EE), Pavla Pletkova (EE), Jenna Ross (ME), Brad Stout (CmpE), and Jon Terrell (ME)tout (CmpE), and Jon Terrell (ME)
Senior Design Project:Senior Design Project: IPFW College of Engineering, Technology, and Computer ScienceIPFW College of Engineering, Technology, and Computer Science
Faculty Advisors: Dr. Chao Chen (CmpE) and Dr. Bongsu Kang (ME)Faculty Advisors: Dr. Chao Chen (CmpE) and Dr. Bongsu Kang (ME)
IntroductionIntroduction
DesignDesign
Currently, orthopedic surgeons use numerous instruments in
order to complete joint surgeries. These instruments require
meticulous manual adjustments creating long, difficult
surgeries. Due to this fact, there is an urgent need to develop
new, easier to use instrumentation which will reduce surgery
time.
It is the goal of the Automated Cut Guide design team to
create an instrument for knee replacement surgery which
greatly reduces the need for manual input, provides the
surgeon with ease of use and, in the end, shortens surgery
duration.
Orthopedic technology involving surgical cutting guides, to
date, have consisted of manually altered components that
require fine tune adjustment that could be tedious and time-
consuming to correctly align in three dimensions. When two
axes are properly aligned, the third is difficult to place without
misaligning the first two that were already properly setup.
For this project we have developed instrumentation, software,
and technology to assist in primary femoral and tibia resections
in non-navigated, and possibly navigated, surgeries. The
instrumentation will be used only for Zimmer Legacy Posterior
Stabilizing (LPS) surgical techniques and Total Knee
Arthroplasty (TKA) incisions and is intended to replace manual
tuning via wireless technology.
Tolerances are in place to provide accuracy when aligning the
cut guide wirelessly. Validation of the tolerances used will be
completed with Zimmer’s Computer Assisted Solutions
Electromagnetic Paddle system, during testing.
AcknowledgmentsAcknowledgments
The Automated Cut Guide team would like to thank our advisors Dr. Bongsu Kang and Dr. Chao Chen for their support and guidance
throughout this project. Their knowledge and advice have contributed to our success thus far.
We would also like to thank our sponsor, Zimmer, Inc., for providing us with an opportunity to work on this project. The continued support
and technical assistance Zimmer, Inc. has provided has proven to be invaluable. In particular, we would like to thank Jackson Heavener,
Senior Engineer I CAS Group, for his dedication and input into this project. Without his expertise and fortitude, this project would have never
happened. We would like to also thank First Gear Engineering & Technology for allowing us to complete our system testing at their facilities.
Necessary movements from the device:
Varus/Valgus Flexion/Extension
Distal/Proximal Anterior/Posterior
Poster by: Patrick Huffman
Front view of the final mechanical design.
Mechanical DesignMechanical Design FE/AP Results
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1 2 3 4 5 6
Test Trials
10 Deg Actual
10 Deg
Theoretical
5 Deg Actual
5 Deg
Theoretical
3 Deg Actual
3 Deg
Theoretical
1 Deg Actual
1 Deg
Theoretical
AngleofRotation(Degrees)
Varus/Valgus Results
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Test Trials
5 Deg
Actual
5 Deg
Theoretical
3 Deg
Actual
3 Deg
Theoretical
1 Deg
Actual
1 Deg
Theoretical
AngleofRotation(Degrees)
Depth Resection Results
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Test Trials
1mm Actual
1mm
Theoretical
3mm Actual
3mm
Theoretical
5mm Actual
5mm
Theoretical
7mm Actual
7mm
Theoretical
DepthResection(mm)
Software DesignSoftware Design ResultsResults
Note: These test results reflect the testing done on April 10th and 11th of 2007
on a bread board.
Front View Side View
ConclusionConclusion
The following requirements were set by our sponsor, Zimmer Inc.
• ±2mm and ±2° accuracy for translational and angular movements
• ±15mm of translation
• ±10° of rotation
With a maximum error of .150mm and 1° 17', our device functions
well within the accuracy requirement for each type of movement.
It was also proven that our device meets the range requirements by
performing limit tests.
In summary, our device functions within the requirements given and
has exceeded the expectations of our sponsor.