SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 29
Baixar para ler offline
iGlar and lixisenatide simultaneous versus
sequential administration: comparison of LixiLan
and GetGoal Duo trials
Published in full:
Rosenstock J et al. Propensity score matched comparative analyses
of simultaneously administered fixed
lixisenatide (iGlarLixi) vs sequential administration of insulin glargine
and lixisenatide in uncontrolled type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab
2018;20:2821 2829
Presented as posters at EASD 2017:
Rosenstock J et al. Diabetologia 2017;60(Suppl. 1):1 608
ePoster 795
Meier J et al. Diabetologia 2017;60(Suppl. 1):1 608
ePoster 808
Simultaneous versus sequential:
Objective and methods
Rosenstock J et al. Diabetes Obes Metab 2018;20:2821 2829
Objective
To conduct two exploratory analyses to compare indirectly the efficacy and safety of
simultaneous administration of iGlar and lixisenatide as a single-pen, titratable, fixed-
ratio combination (iGlarLixi, LixiLan trials) versus sequential administration of iGlar +
lixisenatide (GetGoal Duo trials) in people with T2D
Methods
Indirect exploratory PSM comparison of simultaneous versus sequential administration
iGlar + lixisenatide (GetGoal Duo-1) versus iGlarLixi (LixiLan-O) in insulin-naïve
patients with OAD failure
iGlar + lixisenatide (GetGoal Duo-2) and iGlarLixi (LixiLan-L) in patients with basal
insulin failure
Baseline covariates for PSM included age, race, BMI, HbA1c, FPG, diabetes duration,
and OAD/metformin use
BMI, body mass index; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; PSM, propensity-score matching; OAD, oral antidiabetes drug;
T2D, type 2 diabetes
Simultaneous versus sequential:
HbA1c
Rosenstock J et al. Diabetes Obes Metab 2018;20:2821 2829
The mean change from baseline in HbA1c with simultaneous iGlarLixi was significantly
greater compared with iGlar + lixisenatide for both PSM comparisons
iGlarLixi iGlar + lixisenatide
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
79%
51%
p<0.0001
p<0.0001
62%
33%
LixiLan-O LixiLan-LGetGoal
Duo-1
GetGoal
Duo-2
n indicates the number of patients included in analysis (mITT population); there were small variations in the number of patients meeting the criteria for inclusion
in LixiLan and GetGoal Duo mITT populations based on variable measured
HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; mITT, modified intent-to-treat; PSM, propensity-score matching; SD, standard deviation
Simultaneous versus sequential:
Change in weight and dose
Rosenstock J et al. Diabetes Obes Metab 2018;20:2821 2829
Weight reduction was greater with iGlarLixi compared with iGlar + lixisenatide; the difference
was significant for LixiLan-O versus GetGoal Duo-1
Patients given iGlar + lixisenatide had a higher mean insulin dose compared with those
given iGlarLixi for both PSM comparisons; baseline insulin dose was significantly different
between LixiLan-L and GetGoal Duo-2
iGlarLixi iGlar + lixisenatide
n indicates the number of patients included in analysis (mITT population); there were small variations in the number of patients meeting the criteria for inclusion
in LixiLan and GetGoal Duo mITT populations based on variable measured. *No LS mean difference or p-value has been included for the comparison of the final
mean iGlar dose at end of treatment period in LixiLan-L versus GetGoal Duo-2 as mean insulin doses showed significant difference at baseline (66 32 U vs 35
9 U; p<0.0001)
LS, least squares; mITT, modified intent-to-treat; PSM, propensity-score matching
Simultaneous versus sequential:
Time to control
Rosenstock J et al. Diabetes Obes Metab 2018;20:2821 2829
Time (95% CI) to first HbA1c value <53 mmol/mol (<7.0%)
LixiLan-O versus GetGoal Duo-1 LixiLan-L versus GetGoal Duo-2
iGlarLixi
iGlar + lixisenatide
The median time to achieve target HbA1c:
LixiLan-O versus GetGoal Duo-1: 57 versus 58 days for iGlarLixi and iGlar + lixisenatide
LixiLan-L versus GetGoal Duo-2: 85 versus 192 days for iGlarLixi and iGlar + lixisenatide (p<0.0001)
For LixiLan-O versus GetGoal Duo-1, after the median time, more patients reached target HbA1c sooner
with iGlarLixi compared with iGlar + lixisenatide (p=0.005)
The likelihood of achieving glycemic control was significantly higher with iGlarLixi versus iGlar +
lixisenatide (LixiLan-O vs GetGoal Duo-1: HR 1.6, 95% CI: 1.1 2.3; LixiLan-O vs GetGoal Duo-2: HR 2.2,
95% CI: 1.8 2.8)
CI, confidence interval; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; HR, hazard ratio; NE, non-evaluable
Simultaneous versus sequential:
Adverse events
Rosenstock J et al. Diabetes Obes Metab 2018;20:2821 2829
LixiLan-O vs GetGoal Duo-1 LixiLan-L vs GetGoal Duo-2
iGlarLixi
(n=87)
iGlar +
lixisenatide
(n=87)
iGlarLixi
(n=239)a
iGlar +
lixisenatide
(n=241)b
AE, n (%) 52 (59.8) 62 (71.3)b 130 (54.4) 179 (74.3)b
Serious AE, n (%) 2 (2.3) 5 (5.7) 15 (6.3) 8 (3.3)
AE leading to death, n (%) 1 (1.1) 0 1 (0.4) 1 (0.4)
AE leading to discontinuation, n (%) 6 (6.9) 5 (5.7) 10 (4.2) 12 (5.0)
Gastrointestinal AEs
Diarrhea 7 (8.0) 4 (4.6) 12 (5.0) 16 (6.6)
Leading to discontinuation 0 0 0 0
Nausea 8 (9.2) 18 (20.7) 24 (10.0) 65 (27.0)
Leading to discontinuation 1 (1.1) 1 (1.1) 4 (1.7) 3 (1.2)
Vomiting 1 (1.1) 9 (10.3) 8 (3.3) 21 (8.7)
Leading to discontinuation 0 2 (2.3) 0 4 (1.7)
a n=241 pairs were matched based on randomized patients regardless of their protocol adherence; however, two patients in the iGlarLixi cohort did not meet the
safety population criteria (did not receive at least one dose of study drug)
b Symptomatic hypoglycemia was included in the AE listing for GetGoal Duo-1 and GetGoal Duo-2
c
AE, adverse event
LixiLan-O versus GetGoal-1: percentage of patients with a symptomatic hypoglycemia event
was lower for iGlarLixi versus iGlar + lixisenatide; no events of severe symptomatic
hypoglycemia occurred
LixiLan-L versus GetGoal-2: despite greater HbA1c reductions with iGlarLixi, similar
proportions experienced symptomatic hypoglycemia events in both arms; two events (0.8%)
of severe hypoglycemia occurred with iGlarLixi versus no events with iGlar + lixisenatide
Simultaneous versus sequential:
Hypoglycemia
Rosenstock J et al. Diabetes Obes Metab 2018;20:2821 2829
HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin
iGlarLixi iGlar + lixisenatide
Simultaneous versus sequential:
Conclusions
Rosenstock J et al. Diabetes Obes Metab 2018;20:2821 2829
iGlarLixi resulted in lower final HbA1c levels and a higher percentage of patients
achieving target HbA1c (<53 mmol/mol [<7.0%]) compared with sequential iGlar
+ lixisenatide
Significant body weight reduction occurred with iGlarLixi compared with iGlar +
lixisenatide in the LixiLan-O and GetGoal Duo-1 analysis, but not in the analysis
of LixiLan-L and GetGoal Duo-2
This suggests that mitigation of insulin-associated weight gain may be more
pronounced in patients newly initiating basal insulin compared with patients
who have already experienced insulin-associated weight gain
Indirect PSM comparisons suggest that early simultaneous treatment with a
titratable, fixed-ratio combination of basal insulin and a short-acting GLP-1 RA
may be more effective, with better gastrointestinal tolerability and with the
potential for more weight loss, than a sequential approach of adding a GLP-1
RA in patients with uncontrolled T2D newly initiating or intensifying basal insulin
therapy
LixiLan-L
primary
analysis
conclusions
LixiLan-O
primary
analysis
conclusionsGLP-1 RA, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin;
PSM, propensity-score matching; T2D, type 2 diabetes
1
Comparison of iGlarLixi and basal-bolus regimen
Efficacy and Safety of iGlarLixi, Fixed-Ratio Combination of
Insulin Glargine and Lixisenatide, Compared with Basal-Bolus
Regimen in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Propensity Score
Matched Analysis
IGlarlixi VS Basal Bolus
Tabak A et al. Diabetes Ther 2019
2
iGlarLixi and basal-bolus regimen:
Objective and methods
Tabak A et al. Diabetes Ther 2019
Objective
Membandingkan efikasi dan safety iGlarLixi dengan basal-bolus insulin pada
patients dengan T2DM yang tidak terkontrol dengan basal insulin
Methods
Propensity-score matching digunakan utk memilih pasien yang mendapat iGlarLixi
di LixiLan-L atau basal bolus di GetGoal Duo-2, berdasarkan umur, jenis kelamin,
ras, lama sakit diabetes, and baseline BMI, HbA1c, FPG, dosis insulin , dan
penggunaan metformin
Endpoints dilihat pada minggu 24 untuk iGlarLixi dan minggu 26 untuk basal bolus,
yaitu :
HbA1c dan weight change
HbA1c <7% (53 mmol/mol), tanpa kenaikan Berat badan dan significant
Hypoglycaemia event rates dilihat pada minggu 30 untuk iGlarLixi dan minggu 26
untuk basal bolus; dosis insulin diukur pada akhir minggu 30 untuk iGlarLixi dan
minggu 26 untuk basal bolus
BMI, body mass index; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; T2D, type 2 diabetes
3
4
iGlarLixi and basal-bolus regimen:
HbA1c
*The change from baseline in HbA1c and weight were analysed using an MMRM with treatment groups and randomization strata (HbA1c
mmol/mol)] at screening and metformin use) as fixed effects, and visit (Week 12 and Week 24/26), baseline by visit interaction, and treatment by visit interaction
as covariates
CI, confidence interval; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; MMRM, mixed-effect model with repeated measures; SE, standard error
Penurunan HbA1c lebih
besar pada kelompok
Iglarlixi (1.02%)
dibandingkan kelompok
basal bolus (0.74%)
5
iGlarLixi and basal-bolus regimen:
weight change
*The change from baseline in HbA1c and weight were analysed using an MMRM with treatment groups and randomization strata (HbA1c
mmol/mol)] at screening and metformin use) as fixed effects, and visit (Week 12 and Week 24/26), baseline by visit interaction, and treatment by visit interaction
as covariates
CI, confidence interval; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; MMRM, mixed-effect model with repeated measures; SE, standard error
Terjadi penurunan berat
badan sebanyak 0.62 kg
pada Kelompok iGlarLixi
dan kenaikan berat
badan 0.70 kg pada
kelompok basal bolus
6
iGlarLixi and basal-bolus regimen:
Proportions reaching individual endpoints
0
iGlarLixi (n=194) Basal bolus (n=194)
Hypoglycaemia was defined as documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia (plasma glucose concentration <54 mg/dL [3 mmol/L])
*p<0.01 from Cochran Mantel Haenszel test for the weighted difference between treatment groups in all categories (randomization strata of HbA1c [<8.0%,
HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin
The proportions of patients reaching individual endpoints were higher with
iGlarLixi compared with basal bolus
Proporsi pasien yang
mencapai target individual
endpoint secara konsisten
lebih tinggi pada kelompok
Iglarlixi Vs Basal Bolus
7
iGlarLixi and basal-bolus regimen:
Proportions reaching composite endpoints
Hypoglycaemia was defined as documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia (plasma glucose concentration <54 mg/dL [3 mmol/L])
*p<0.01 from Cochran Mantel Haenszel test for the weighted difference between treatment groups in all categories (randomization strata of HbA1c [<8.0%,
HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin
The proportions of patients reaching composite endpoints were higher with
iGlarLixi compared with basal bolus
iGlarLixi (n=194) Basal bolus (n=194)
Proporsi pasien yang
mencapai target
individual endpoint
secara konsisten lebih
tinggi pada kelompok
Iglarlixi Vs Basal Bolus
8
iGlarLixi and basal-bolus regimen:
Hypoglycaemia and insulin dose
iGlarLixi (n=194) Basal-bolus (n=195)
Hypoglycaemia was defined as documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia
mmol/L])
*p-values were estimated from Poisson regression with treatment as a
fixed factor and log value of patient-years of exposure as an offset variable
iGlarLixi
(n=194)
Basal
bolus
(n=194)
Baseline, mean (SD) 39 (8) 38 (11)
Week 30/26, mean (SD) 49 (11) 53 (23)
LS mean (SE) change from
baseline
9 (1) 14 (1)
LS mean treatment difference ±
SE (95% CI)
5 ± 1
(2, 8)
p-value 0.0003
Hypoglycaemia events per patient-year Average daily insulin dose
Observed cases are used for this analysis. Based on MMRM with
treatment groups and randomization strata (HbA1c
mmol/mol)] at screening and metformin use) as fixed effects, and visit
(Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, and Week 30/26), baseline by visit
interaction, and treatment by visit interaction as covariates
CI, confidence interval; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; LS, least squares;
MMRM, mixed-effect model with repeated measures; SD, standard
deviation; SE, standard error
Rate terjadinya
hipoglikemia lebih
rendah pada iglarlixi
dibandingkan basal
bolus
Insulin dosis lebih
rendah pada iglalixi
dibandingkan Basal
Bolus
9
iGlarLixi and basal-bolus regimen:
Kesimpulan
Treatment dengan iGlarLixi berhubungan dengan
penurunan berat badan, penurunan HbA1c lebih besar, dan
lebih sedikit kejadian hypoglycaemia dibandingkan dengan
basal-bolus regimen
iGlarLixi berhubungan dengan lebih banyak pasien yang
mencapai target HbA1c <7% [53 mmol/mol]) dan composite
endpoints
Hal ini dapat dicapai dengan injeksi 1 kali sehari (iglarlixi)
versus multiple injeksi untuk basal-bolus insulin
Pada pasien T2DM tidak terkontrol dengan basal insulin,
intensifikasi dengan iGlarLixi memiliki efikasi lebih,
ditoleransi baik dan lebih simple dibandingkan dengan
switching ke basal bolus
HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; T2D, type 2 diabetes
LixiLan-L
SAID.SQA.19.04.0145/(04/19)
Hanya Metformin yang dilanjutkan pada fase run-in
DESIGN: Randomized, open-label, parallel-group, 30-week treatment trial
6-week
run-in phase
Insulin glargine 100 U/mL (iGlar) Metformin
Dosis insulin disesuaikan untuk mencapai GD Puasa
target (80 to 100 mg/dL) and capped to 60 U/day pada kedua
groups
iGlarLixi Metformin
30-minggu treatment period
Pasien Diabetes tipe 2
dengan
Basal insulin >6 bulan
Dosis stabil 15 40 U/d
± OADs
HbA1c 10%
GD puasa 200
mg/dL n=367
7% HbA1c %
GD Puasa
Dosis iGlar
n=369
Inisiasi iGlar
dan atau titrasi
FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin
OAD, oral antidiabetic drug; U, unit
Aroda VR, et al. Diabetes Care 2016;39:1972 80
iGlarLixi adalah self-injected, diberikan 1x sehari, pemberian dalam 1 jam (0 60
min) sebelum sarapan
Setelah 2 minggu dalam dosis stabil, dosis di titrasi sekali dalam seminggu untuk
mencapai target puasa SMPG of 4.4 to 5.6 mmol/L (80 to 100 mg/dL), mencegah
hipoglikemia.
Pasien di
random ke
iGlarLixi
PEN B
Dosis iGlar dari 30 U hingga 60 U; dosis awal 30 U
PEN A
Dosis iGlar dari 10 hingga 40 U; dosis awal 10 U per hari
Dosis iGlar
U/day
sebelum
randomisasi
Dosis iGlar
<30 U/day
sebelum
randomisasi
SMPG, self-measured plasma glucose
Aroda VR, et al. Diabetes Care 2016;39:1972 80
For statistical analysis of the study endpoints, a step-down
testing procedure was applied to control for type 1 error
PPG, postprandial glucose
PRIMARY
Superioritas dari iGlarLixi dibandingkan iGlar 100 U/mL dalam perubahan HbA1c pada minggu ke 30
SECONDARY
Superioritas dari iGlarLixi dibandingkan iGlar pada:
2 jam perjalanan glukosa plasma
Berat badan
7-point SMPG
Persentase pada pasien dengan HbA1c <7% dan tanpa peningkatan berat badan
Dosis iGlar
Persentase pada pasien dengan HbA1c <7% dan tanpa peningkatan berat badan dan/atau tanpa hipoglikemi simptomatik
Gula darah Puasa
Tambahan secondary endpoints termasuk:
Persentase responden dengan HbA1c <7% dan
Persentase pasien dengan HbA1c <7%, tanpa kenaikan berat badan pada minggu 30 and tidak ada resiko hipoglikemia
simptomatik
SAFETY
Didokumentasi hipoglikemi simptomatik
Kejadian efek samping
Aroda VR, et al. Diabetes Care 2016;39:1972 80
iGlarLixi
(n=367)
iGlar
(n=369)
Usia (years) 59.6 (9.4) 60.3 (8.7)
Wanita (%) 55.0 51.5
Caucasian/Black (%) 92/5 92/6
Berat badan (kg) at Baseline 87.7 (14.5) 87.1 (14.8)
BMI (kg/m2) at Baseline 31.3 (4.3) 31.0 (4.2)
Durasi Diabetes (years) 12.0 (6.6) 12.1 (6.9)
Durasi penggunaan Basal Insulin (years) 3.1 (3.1) 3.3 (3.1)
Jenis Basal insulin at Screening (%)
iGlar 64 65
Detemir 13 15
NPH 23 20
OAD use at Screening (%)
None 5 5
Metformin 46 52
Sulfonylurea (SU) 4 4
DPP-4 inhibitor 1 1
Metformin + SU 37 32
Metformin + DPP-4 inhibitor 5 5
BMI, body mass index; DPP-4, dipeptidyl peptidase 4;
NPH, neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin; SU, sulfonylurea
Aroda VR, et al. Diabetes Care 2016;39:1972 80
iGlarLixi
(n=367)
iGlar
(n=369)
HbA1c (%)
Screening 8.5 8.5
Baseline 8.1 8.1
FPG, mmol/L
Screening 7.9 8
Baseline 7.3 7.4
iGlar dose (U)
Start of run in 27.3 27.7
End of run in 35.0 35.2
Aroda VR, et al. Diabetes Care 2016;39:1972 80
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
9.0
0.62
iGlar
HbA1c selama studi (%)
Modified intent-to-treat population
*Weighted average of proportion difference between treatment groups
BL, baseline; CI, confidence interval; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; LS, least squares; LOCF, last observation carried forward; S, screening;
SE, standard error
LS mean difference
95% CI, p-value
0.52 ( 0.633 to 0.397)
p<0.0001
iGlarLixi
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
9.0
Week
iGlarLixi
iGlar
6.9%
7.5%
S BL 8 12 24 30 30
LOCF
1.13LS mean change
HbA1c <7% HbA1c
25.5%*
95% CI:
18.9% 32.1%
p<0.0001
19.8%*
95% CI:
13.9% 25.6%
p<0.0001
iGlarLixi
iGlar
55
34
30
14
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Target HbA1c minggu ke 30
2
1
1
2
3
0
BL 4 8 12 18 24 30 30
LOCF
Time (weeks)
iGlarLixi
iGlar
+0.7 kg
0.7 kg
Body weight (kg) change
from baseline to Week 30
-85.1
-70.2
-25.1
-8.4
95% CI: 70.7 to 52.9
p<0.0001
61.8*
2-hr PPGa (mg/dL) Excursiona (mg/dL)
60.0
95% CI: 70.1 to 50.0
Modified intent-to-treat population; ANCOVA for PPG analyses; MMRM for body weight analyses
aStandardized liquid breakfast meal
*LS mean difference vs iGlar
ANCOVA, analysis of covariance; CI, confidence interval; LOCF, last observation carried forward; LS, least squares; MMRM, mixed-effect model with
repeated measures; PPG, postprandial glucose; SE, standard error
Safety population
E/p-y, event/patient-year; GI, gastrointestinal
Documented symptomatic
hypoglycemia
E/p-y 0.02 < 0.01
iGlarLixi
(n = 469)
iGlar
(n = 467)
Nausea 38 (10.4) 2 (0.5)
Discontinuation 4 (1.1) 0
Vomiting 13 (3.6) 2 (0.5)
Discontinuation 2 (0.4) 0
Diarrhea 16 (4.4) 10 (2.7)
Discontinuation 0 0
All data are n (%)
Efek samping GI
iGlarLixi
iGlar
40
42.5
0
10
20
30
40
50
34.2
31.7
19.9
13.4
18.6
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
9.0
HbA1c <7% tanpa peningkatan
berat badan di minggu ke 30
HbA1c <7% tanpa peninmgkatan
berat badan di minggu 30 dan
Tanpa hipoglikemia
didokumentasi
HbA1c <7%
tanpa hipoglikemi
didokumentasi
20.8%*
95% CI: 15.0 to 26.7
p<0.0001 13.2%*
95% CI: 7.1 to 19.3
10.9%*
95% CI: 5.9 to 16.0
p<0.0001
mITT population
*Weighted average of proportion difference between
treatment groups; No p-value available as comparison not
specified in step-down testing procedure
Aroda VR, et al. Diabetes Care 2016;39:1972 80
iGlarLixi (n=366)
iGlar (n=365)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Week
Aroda V, et al. ADA 2016 congress, scientific sessions webcast. Available at:
http://professional.diabetes.org/webcasts-ss2016, last accessed 10 May 2017
Average daily Insulin dose (U)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112 15 18 21 24 27 30 30
LOCF
Run-in
start Randomization
-4
mITT population
iGlarLixi (n=366)
iGlar (n=365)
iGlar dose (U)
iGlarLixi
(n=365)
iGlar
(n=365)
Start of run-in 28 29
End of run-in 35 35
Week 30 (LOCF) 46 47
*LS mean change in HbA1c from baseline to Week 30.
Proportion of patients affected by documented symptomatic hypoglycemia
- vs iGlar-treated groups.
Mean change in weight from baseline to Week 30.
Proportion of patients who discontinued iGlarLixi treatment as a result of gastrointestinal (GI)
treatment-emergent adverse events.
1. Aroda VR et al. Diabetes Care. 2016;39:1972-1980.
Penurunan HbA1c yang signifikan pada minggu ke 30 1.1%*
Similar Hipoglikemia 40.0 vs 42.5%
Tanpa peningkatan berat badan 0.7 kg
Efek samping GI yang lebih rendah dibandingkan dengan
lixisenatide, yang menyebabkan penghentian pengobatan
1.1%§
1
LixiLan-O primary
methods and results
Published in full:
Rosenstock JR et al. Benefits of LixiLan, a titratable fixed-ratio
combination of insulin glargine plus lixisenatide, versus insulin
glargine and lixisenatide monocomponents in type 2 diabetes
inadequately controlled on oral agents: the LixiLan-O randomized
trial. Diabetes Care 2016;39:2026 2035
LixiLan-O
Iglarlixi memperlihatkan statistical superiority dibanding insulin glargine
100 units/mL atau lixisenatide pada penurunan HbA1c pada pasien DM tipe
2 yang sebelumnya mendapat metformin OAD lain, dengan profil safety
sebanding dengan insulin glargine 100 units/mL dan lixisenatide1
2
aStop OAD ke-2/titrasi metformin hingga paling tidak 2000 mg/hari atau dosis maximal yg ditoleransi hari sebelum
randomisasi)
4-weeka
run-in
phase
Lixi + metformin
iGlar + metformin
iGlar dose adjusted to self-monitored FPG target
(80 100 mg/dL) and capped to 60 U/day in the
iGlarLixi and iGlar groups
iGlarLixi + metformin
30-week treatment period
10
20
Up to
2-week
screening
LixiLan-O: Pasien DM Tipe 2 yang tidak terkontrol dengan OAD
(NCT02058147)
Rosenstock J et al. Diabetes Care 2016;39:2026 2035
DESIGN: Randomized, open-label, active controlled, 3-arm parallel-group trial
Pasien DM tipe 2 dengan:
Metformin saja atau kombinasi
dengan OAD ke-2
HbA1c:
7.0% 9.0% (jika dgn 2 OAD)
7.5% 10% (jika dgn
metformin saja )
n = 234
n = 469
n = 467
FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; OAD, oral antidiabetic drug; T2D, type 2 diabetes
3
Objectives and endpoints
PRIMARY
Perubahan HbA1c di minggu 30:
Superiority of iGlarLixi over Lixisenatide AND
Non-inferiority of iGlarLixi over iGlar (non inferiority margin: 0.3%)
Once shown, superiority can be tested (included in testing hierarchy)
SECONDARY
Efek iGlarLixi vs iGlar dan lixisenatide pada:
Ekskursi glukosa 2 jam pp dan 2 jam PP
Berat badan
7-point SMPG
GDP
Persentase responder yang mencapai
Persentase responder yang mencapai HbA1c <7% tanpa kenaikan berat badan
Persentase responder yang mencapai HbA1c <7% tanpa documented, symptomatic hypoglycemia
Persentase responder yang mencapai HbA1c <7% tanpa kenaikan berat badan, dan documented, symptomatic
hypoglycemia
Dosis iGlar
SAFETY
Documented, symptomatic hypoglycemia
Insidens adverse events
Rosenstock J, et al. Diabetes Care 2016;39:2026 35
For statistical analysis of the study endpoints, a step-down
testing procedure was applied to control for type 1 error
PPG, postprandial glucose
4
Rosenstock J, et al. Diabetes Care 2016;39:2026 35
Sanofi data on file, CSR HOE901/AVE0010-EFC12404 v1:pages 78, 80
iGlarLixi
(n=469)
iGlar
(n=467)
Lixisenatide
(n=234)
All
(N=1170)
Age (years) 58.2 (9.5) 58.3 (9.4) 58.7 (8.7) 58.4 (9.3)
Male/female (%) 47.3/52.7 50.7/49.3 56.8/43.2 50.6/49.4
Caucasian/Black (%) 88.9/7.0 90.1/7.1 92.3/5.1 90.1/6.7
Diabetes duration (years) 8.9 (5.5) 8.7 (5.6) 8.9 (6.3) 8.8 (5.7)
BMI (kg/m2) 31.6 (4.4) 31.7 (4.5) 32.0 (4.4) 31.7 (4.4)
% P kg/m2 62.9 61.7 67.9 63.4
HbA1c (%) at screening 8.2 (0.7) 8.2 (0.7) 8.3 (0.7) 8.2 (0.7)
HbA1c (%) at randomization 8.1 (0.7) 8.1 (0.7) 8.2 (0.7) 8.1 (0.7)
% Patients with HbA1c 55.9 55.7 56.0 55.8
FPG, mmol/L (mg/dL) 9.9 (178) 9.8 (176) 9.8 (176) 9.8 (177)
Metformin dose (baseline) (mg) 2246 (457) 2245 (445) 2267 (427) 2250 (446)
Second OAD use at screening (%) 58.4 57.8 56.8 57.9
Sulfonylurea 55.2 53.3 52.6 53.9
Glinide 0.6 2.1 2.1 1.5
SGLT-2 inhibitor 0.4 0.4 0 0.3
DPP-4 inhibitor 2.6 2.4 2.1 2.4
BMI, body mass index; DPP-4, dipeptidyl peptidase 4
SGLT-2, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2
Demographics and baseline characteristics
5
LixiLan-O: Algoritme titrasi
iGlarLixi adalah terapi injeksi yang diberikan 1x sehari, pemberian dalam 1jam sebelum sarapan
Setelah 2 minggu dalam dosis stabil, dosis dititrasi sekali seminggu untuk mencapai GDP 80 sampai 100
mg/dL), mencegah hipoglikemia
Semua pasien
dirandom mulai
dengan PEN A
PEN B (ratio of 3 U : 1 µg)
Dosis iGlar dari 30 U hingga 60 U; digunakan untuk pasien
yang menggunakan dosis 41 60 U
PEN A (ratio of 2 U : 1 µg)
Dosis iGlar dari 10 hingga 40 U; dosis awal 10 U per hari
SMPG, self-measured plasma glucose
Rosenstock J, et al. Diabetes Care 2016;39:2026 35
6
LixiLan-O: Key Result
HbA1c reduction
1.6
1.3
0.9
-1.8
-1.6
-1.4
-1.2
-1.0
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
LSmeanchange(%)
iGlarLixi
iGlar
Lixisenatide
p<0.0001
p<0.0001
Patients at target HbA1c
74
5659
40
33
19
0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
HbA1c <7%
Proportionofpatients
(%)
14.3*
40.6*
16.4*
36.4*
0.3
1.1
2.3
-3.0
-2.0
-1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
LSmeanchange(kg)
Weight change
1.4*
95% CI: 1.9, 0.9
2.0
95% CI: 1.4, 2.6
Baseline 89.4 89.8 90.8
Hypoglycemia §
25.6
23.6
6.4
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
Patients with
events (%)
No. of events
per patient
year
1.4 1.2
0.3
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
FPG change
3.5
3.3
1.5
-4.0
-3.5
-3.0
-2.5
-2.0
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
LSmeanchange
(mmol/L)
0.2
95% CI: 0.4, 0.04
2.0
95% CI: 2.2, 1.7
hypoglycemia dL
§ One event of severe hypoglycemia was reported during the study and occurred in the iGlar group
Rosenstock J, et al. Diabetes Care 2016;39:2026 35
2-hour PPG
reduction
2.4
95% CI: 2.8, 2.0
1.1
95% CI: 1.6, 0.6
5.7
3.3
4.6
-6.0
-5.0
-4.0
-3.0
-2.0
-1.0
0.0
LSmeanchange
(mmol/L)
7
Profil 7-point SMPG
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Mean±SE
Baseline
Week 30
mmol/L mg/dL
234
216
198
180
162
144
126
108
90
Pre-breakfast 2-hour
post-breakfast
Pre-lunch Pre-dinner 2-hour
post-dinner
Bedtime2-hour
post-lunch
mITT population
Mean change in 7-point SMPG
Rosenstock J, et al. Diabetes Care 2016;39:2026 35
iGlarLixi (n=468)
iGlar (n=466)
Lixisenatide (n=233)
Penurunan Glukosa harian
(seven-point SMPG) lebih
besar pada kelompok Iglarlixi
dibandingan Iglar dan lixi
8
Rata rata dosis insulin harian
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Mean±SE
Week
Average daily Insulin dose (U)
40 U
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 30
LOCF
Sanofi data on file, CSR HOE901/AVE0010-EFC12404 v1:pages 109 10
mITT population
iGlarLixi (n=468)
iGlar (n=466)
Dosis insulin harian
sama antara iglarlixi
dan iglar
9
Pasien mencapai composite endpoints
31.8
18.9
27.9
26.2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Proportionofpatients(%) HbA1c <7% with
no body weight gain
HbA1c <7% with
no body weight gain and
no documented
18.1%*
95% CI: 12.2 to 24.0
p<0.0001
15.2%*
95% CI: 8.1 to 22.4
13.0%*
95% CI: 7.5 to 18.5
p<0.0001
5.6%*
95% CI: 1.3 to 12.6
mITT population
*Weighted average of proportion difference between treatment groups
No p-value available as comparison not specified in step-down testing procedure
43.2
25.1
Rosenstock J, et al. Diabetes Care 2016;39:2026 35
iGlarLixi (n=468)
iGlar (n=466)
Lixisenatide (n=233)
Lebih banyak pasien yang
mencapai composite
endpoint pada Iglarlixi
dibanding iglar dan lixi
10
Profil safety
Patients, n (%), with iGlarLixi
(n=469)
iGlar
(n=467)
Lixisenatide
(n=233)
TEAE
Any 267 (56.9%) 227 (48.6%) 157 (67.4%)
Serious 18 (3.8%) 19 (4.1%) 9 (3.9%)
Leading to Death 2 (0.4%) 3 (0.6%) 1 (0.4%)
Leading to Discontinuation 12 (2.6%) 9 (1.9%) 21 (9.0%)
GI TEAEs
Nausea 45 (9.6%) 17 (3.6%) 56 (24.0%)
discontinuation 2 (0.4%) 0 6 (2.6%)
Vomiting 15 (3.2%) 7 (1.5%) 15 (6.4%)
discontinuation 2 (0.4%) 0 4 (1.7%)
Diarrhea 42 (9.0%) 20 (4.3%) 21 (9.0%)
discontinuation 1 (0.2%) 0 2 (0.9%)
Safety population
Data analyses are descriptive
TEAE, treatment emergent adverse event
Rosenstock J, et al. Diabetes Care 2016;39:2026 35
Mual dan muntah lebih
jarang terjadi pada igalrlixi
dibanding Lixisenatide
11
Kesimpulan
Tercapainya Primary endpoint yaitu superiority iGlarLixi dalam menurunkan HbA1c
versus iGlar dan Lixisenatide
iGlarLixi dikombinasi dengan metformin:
Penurunan HbA1c dari 8.1% menjadi 6.5%
menurunkan 2h-PPG dan ekskursi glucosa
Mencegah kenaikan berat badan ( 0.3 kg) dan selisih perubahan berat badan dengan
kelompok Iglar adalah 1.4 kg (p<0.0001)
Sebanyak 74% pasien mencapai HbA1c <7%
43% HbA1c <7% tanpa kenaikan berat badan
32% HbA1c <7%, tanpa kenaikan berat badan dan documented hypoglycemia
Rosenstock J, et al. Diabetes Care 2016;39:2026 35
12
Kesimpulan
insiden kelompok
iGlarLixi dan iGlar dan lebih rendah pada kelompok Lixisenatide
Secara umum, iGlarLixi dapat ditoleransi dengan profil safety sama dengan
kelompok iGlar dan Lixisenatide
Mual dan muntah lebih jarang terjadi pada igalrlixi dibanding Lixisenatide
Rosenstock J, et al. Diabetes Care 2016;39:2026 35
Slide share soliqua 070320
Slide share soliqua 070320
Slide share soliqua 070320
Slide share soliqua 070320
Slide share soliqua 070320
Slide share soliqua 070320
Slide share soliqua 070320
Slide share soliqua 070320

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Semaglutide journal club
Semaglutide journal clubSemaglutide journal club
Semaglutide journal clubBhargav Kiran
 
Semaglutide brings breakthroughs in weight management for type 2 diabetes bio...
Semaglutide brings breakthroughs in weight management for type 2 diabetes bio...Semaglutide brings breakthroughs in weight management for type 2 diabetes bio...
Semaglutide brings breakthroughs in weight management for type 2 diabetes bio...DoriaFang
 
Diabetes Management: new drugs and new approaches by Dr Adam Deane
Diabetes Management: new drugs and new approaches by Dr Adam DeaneDiabetes Management: new drugs and new approaches by Dr Adam Deane
Diabetes Management: new drugs and new approaches by Dr Adam DeaneCICM 2019 Annual Scientific Meeting
 
Evidence for a new category of diabetes care reversal
Evidence for a new category of diabetes care reversalEvidence for a new category of diabetes care reversal
Evidence for a new category of diabetes care reversalJames McCarter
 
Immune diseases - What about all those MABs by Dr Siva Senthuran
Immune diseases - What about all those MABs by Dr Siva SenthuranImmune diseases - What about all those MABs by Dr Siva Senthuran
Immune diseases - What about all those MABs by Dr Siva SenthuranCICM 2019 Annual Scientific Meeting
 
Effectiveness of Continuous Remote Care and Nutritional Ketosis for Type 2 Di...
Effectiveness of Continuous Remote Care and Nutritional Ketosis for Type 2 Di...Effectiveness of Continuous Remote Care and Nutritional Ketosis for Type 2 Di...
Effectiveness of Continuous Remote Care and Nutritional Ketosis for Type 2 Di...James McCarter
 
State of art cardiovascular prevention in diabetes - helsinki april 2018
State of art   cardiovascular prevention in diabetes - helsinki april 2018State of art   cardiovascular prevention in diabetes - helsinki april 2018
State of art cardiovascular prevention in diabetes - helsinki april 2018SoM
 
Adel abdel aziz.cgc 2
Adel abdel aziz.cgc 2Adel abdel aziz.cgc 2
Adel abdel aziz.cgc 2Emad Hamed
 
Gm1 gangliosidosis and morquio b disease an update on genetic alterations and...
Gm1 gangliosidosis and morquio b disease an update on genetic alterations and...Gm1 gangliosidosis and morquio b disease an update on genetic alterations and...
Gm1 gangliosidosis and morquio b disease an update on genetic alterations and...Edwin Alvarado
 
Data Driven is just the beginning, why the details of evidence matter by Dr. ...
Data Driven is just the beginning, why the details of evidence matter by Dr. ...Data Driven is just the beginning, why the details of evidence matter by Dr. ...
Data Driven is just the beginning, why the details of evidence matter by Dr. ...James McCarter
 
The Top Myths About Ketosis Debunked by Clinical Trials
The Top Myths About Ketosis Debunked by Clinical TrialsThe Top Myths About Ketosis Debunked by Clinical Trials
The Top Myths About Ketosis Debunked by Clinical TrialsJames McCarter
 
Cardiovascular events & Hypoglycemia
Cardiovascular events & HypoglycemiaCardiovascular events & Hypoglycemia
Cardiovascular events & Hypoglycemiaendodiabetes
 
Effect of fruit restriction on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabe...
Effect of fruit restriction on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabe...Effect of fruit restriction on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabe...
Effect of fruit restriction on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabe...Runa La-Ela
 

Mais procurados (19)

Semaglutide journal club
Semaglutide journal clubSemaglutide journal club
Semaglutide journal club
 
Iglar lixi vs basal bolus
Iglar lixi vs basal bolusIglar lixi vs basal bolus
Iglar lixi vs basal bolus
 
Semaglutide brings breakthroughs in weight management for type 2 diabetes bio...
Semaglutide brings breakthroughs in weight management for type 2 diabetes bio...Semaglutide brings breakthroughs in weight management for type 2 diabetes bio...
Semaglutide brings breakthroughs in weight management for type 2 diabetes bio...
 
Diabetes Management: new drugs and new approaches by Dr Adam Deane
Diabetes Management: new drugs and new approaches by Dr Adam DeaneDiabetes Management: new drugs and new approaches by Dr Adam Deane
Diabetes Management: new drugs and new approaches by Dr Adam Deane
 
Evidence for a new category of diabetes care reversal
Evidence for a new category of diabetes care reversalEvidence for a new category of diabetes care reversal
Evidence for a new category of diabetes care reversal
 
Immune diseases - What about all those MABs by Dr Siva Senthuran
Immune diseases - What about all those MABs by Dr Siva SenthuranImmune diseases - What about all those MABs by Dr Siva Senthuran
Immune diseases - What about all those MABs by Dr Siva Senthuran
 
Effectiveness of Continuous Remote Care and Nutritional Ketosis for Type 2 Di...
Effectiveness of Continuous Remote Care and Nutritional Ketosis for Type 2 Di...Effectiveness of Continuous Remote Care and Nutritional Ketosis for Type 2 Di...
Effectiveness of Continuous Remote Care and Nutritional Ketosis for Type 2 Di...
 
State of art cardiovascular prevention in diabetes - helsinki april 2018
State of art   cardiovascular prevention in diabetes - helsinki april 2018State of art   cardiovascular prevention in diabetes - helsinki april 2018
State of art cardiovascular prevention in diabetes - helsinki april 2018
 
Abcc1
Abcc1Abcc1
Abcc1
 
Adel abdel aziz.cgc 2
Adel abdel aziz.cgc 2Adel abdel aziz.cgc 2
Adel abdel aziz.cgc 2
 
Gm1 gangliosidosis and morquio b disease an update on genetic alterations and...
Gm1 gangliosidosis and morquio b disease an update on genetic alterations and...Gm1 gangliosidosis and morquio b disease an update on genetic alterations and...
Gm1 gangliosidosis and morquio b disease an update on genetic alterations and...
 
Data Driven is just the beginning, why the details of evidence matter by Dr. ...
Data Driven is just the beginning, why the details of evidence matter by Dr. ...Data Driven is just the beginning, why the details of evidence matter by Dr. ...
Data Driven is just the beginning, why the details of evidence matter by Dr. ...
 
The Top Myths About Ketosis Debunked by Clinical Trials
The Top Myths About Ketosis Debunked by Clinical TrialsThe Top Myths About Ketosis Debunked by Clinical Trials
The Top Myths About Ketosis Debunked by Clinical Trials
 
Cardiovascular events & Hypoglycemia
Cardiovascular events & HypoglycemiaCardiovascular events & Hypoglycemia
Cardiovascular events & Hypoglycemia
 
Nejm semiglutide
Nejm   semiglutideNejm   semiglutide
Nejm semiglutide
 
Effect of fruit restriction on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabe...
Effect of fruit restriction on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabe...Effect of fruit restriction on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabe...
Effect of fruit restriction on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabe...
 
Glycated Hemoglobin as a Dual Biomarker in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Predictin...
Glycated Hemoglobin as a Dual Biomarker in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Predictin...Glycated Hemoglobin as a Dual Biomarker in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Predictin...
Glycated Hemoglobin as a Dual Biomarker in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Predictin...
 
Adopt
AdoptAdopt
Adopt
 
Managing Type 2 Diabetes
Managing Type 2 DiabetesManaging Type 2 Diabetes
Managing Type 2 Diabetes
 

Semelhante a Slide share soliqua 070320

Emerging evidence on liraglutide
Emerging evidence on liraglutide Emerging evidence on liraglutide
Emerging evidence on liraglutide DrShrey Bhatia
 
Achieving Treatment Outcome With DPP4i for Diabetic Patient "Efficacy Beyond ...
Achieving Treatment Outcome With DPP4i for Diabetic Patient "Efficacy Beyond ...Achieving Treatment Outcome With DPP4i for Diabetic Patient "Efficacy Beyond ...
Achieving Treatment Outcome With DPP4i for Diabetic Patient "Efficacy Beyond ...Suharti Wairagya
 
ORFORGLIPRON cardiac patients.pptx
ORFORGLIPRON cardiac patients.pptxORFORGLIPRON cardiac patients.pptx
ORFORGLIPRON cardiac patients.pptxpediacardio
 
Linagliptin - Speaker training kit India final1234.pptx
Linagliptin - Speaker training kit India final1234.pptxLinagliptin - Speaker training kit India final1234.pptx
Linagliptin - Speaker training kit India final1234.pptxAmeetRathod3
 
Linagliptin Endocrinologist Prespective - Case.pptx
Linagliptin Endocrinologist Prespective - Case.pptxLinagliptin Endocrinologist Prespective - Case.pptx
Linagliptin Endocrinologist Prespective - Case.pptxAmeetRathod3
 
pad2021_sglt2-inhibitors-glp1-agonists_handout.pdf
pad2021_sglt2-inhibitors-glp1-agonists_handout.pdfpad2021_sglt2-inhibitors-glp1-agonists_handout.pdf
pad2021_sglt2-inhibitors-glp1-agonists_handout.pdfekramy abdo
 
C1 cda pharmacologic management of type 2 diabetes 2016
C1 cda pharmacologic management of type 2 diabetes 2016C1 cda pharmacologic management of type 2 diabetes 2016
C1 cda pharmacologic management of type 2 diabetes 2016Diabetes for all
 
Diabetic dyslipidemia and Saroglitazar
Diabetic dyslipidemia and SaroglitazarDiabetic dyslipidemia and Saroglitazar
Diabetic dyslipidemia and SaroglitazarDr Vivek Baliga
 
After Metformin What- Indian Scenario
After Metformin What- Indian ScenarioAfter Metformin What- Indian Scenario
After Metformin What- Indian ScenarioNaveen Kumar
 
GSK- Ada investor-meeting-june-2012
GSK- Ada investor-meeting-june-2012GSK- Ada investor-meeting-june-2012
GSK- Ada investor-meeting-june-2012The ScientifiK
 
Intensification Options after basal Insulin Revisited
Intensification Options after basal Insulin RevisitedIntensification Options after basal Insulin Revisited
Intensification Options after basal Insulin RevisitedUsama Ragab
 
Saxagliptin eficacia
Saxagliptin eficaciaSaxagliptin eficacia
Saxagliptin eficaciaInés Gomez
 
Dislipidemia no dm2 insulina x oad
Dislipidemia no dm2 insulina x oad Dislipidemia no dm2 insulina x oad
Dislipidemia no dm2 insulina x oad Ruy Pantoja
 

Semelhante a Slide share soliqua 070320 (20)

Emerging evidence on liraglutide
Emerging evidence on liraglutide Emerging evidence on liraglutide
Emerging evidence on liraglutide
 
GLP1 Role : DM type 2
GLP1 Role : DM type 2GLP1 Role : DM type 2
GLP1 Role : DM type 2
 
J victoria .pptx
J victoria .pptxJ victoria .pptx
J victoria .pptx
 
Achieving Treatment Outcome With DPP4i for Diabetic Patient "Efficacy Beyond ...
Achieving Treatment Outcome With DPP4i for Diabetic Patient "Efficacy Beyond ...Achieving Treatment Outcome With DPP4i for Diabetic Patient "Efficacy Beyond ...
Achieving Treatment Outcome With DPP4i for Diabetic Patient "Efficacy Beyond ...
 
ORFORGLIPRON cardiac patients.pptx
ORFORGLIPRON cardiac patients.pptxORFORGLIPRON cardiac patients.pptx
ORFORGLIPRON cardiac patients.pptx
 
Paper 5
Paper 5Paper 5
Paper 5
 
Liraglutide 1
Liraglutide 1Liraglutide 1
Liraglutide 1
 
Glp1 and insulin
Glp1 and insulinGlp1 and insulin
Glp1 and insulin
 
Literature Evaluation.pptx
Literature Evaluation.pptxLiterature Evaluation.pptx
Literature Evaluation.pptx
 
Linagliptin - Speaker training kit India final1234.pptx
Linagliptin - Speaker training kit India final1234.pptxLinagliptin - Speaker training kit India final1234.pptx
Linagliptin - Speaker training kit India final1234.pptx
 
Linagliptin Endocrinologist Prespective - Case.pptx
Linagliptin Endocrinologist Prespective - Case.pptxLinagliptin Endocrinologist Prespective - Case.pptx
Linagliptin Endocrinologist Prespective - Case.pptx
 
Bydureon
BydureonBydureon
Bydureon
 
pad2021_sglt2-inhibitors-glp1-agonists_handout.pdf
pad2021_sglt2-inhibitors-glp1-agonists_handout.pdfpad2021_sglt2-inhibitors-glp1-agonists_handout.pdf
pad2021_sglt2-inhibitors-glp1-agonists_handout.pdf
 
C1 cda pharmacologic management of type 2 diabetes 2016
C1 cda pharmacologic management of type 2 diabetes 2016C1 cda pharmacologic management of type 2 diabetes 2016
C1 cda pharmacologic management of type 2 diabetes 2016
 
Diabetic dyslipidemia and Saroglitazar
Diabetic dyslipidemia and SaroglitazarDiabetic dyslipidemia and Saroglitazar
Diabetic dyslipidemia and Saroglitazar
 
After Metformin What- Indian Scenario
After Metformin What- Indian ScenarioAfter Metformin What- Indian Scenario
After Metformin What- Indian Scenario
 
GSK- Ada investor-meeting-june-2012
GSK- Ada investor-meeting-june-2012GSK- Ada investor-meeting-june-2012
GSK- Ada investor-meeting-june-2012
 
Intensification Options after basal Insulin Revisited
Intensification Options after basal Insulin RevisitedIntensification Options after basal Insulin Revisited
Intensification Options after basal Insulin Revisited
 
Saxagliptin eficacia
Saxagliptin eficaciaSaxagliptin eficacia
Saxagliptin eficacia
 
Dislipidemia no dm2 insulina x oad
Dislipidemia no dm2 insulina x oad Dislipidemia no dm2 insulina x oad
Dislipidemia no dm2 insulina x oad
 

Último

Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptxUnit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptxVishalSingh1417
 
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SDMeasures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SDThiyagu K
 
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptxMaritesTamaniVerdade
 
Role Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptx
Role Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptxRole Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptx
Role Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptxNikitaBankoti2
 
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptxUnit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptxVishalSingh1417
 
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptxUnit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptxVishalSingh1417
 
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfHoldier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfagholdier
 
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.MaryamAhmad92
 
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeMeasures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeThiyagu K
 
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.christianmathematics
 
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning ExhibitSociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibitjbellavia9
 
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in DelhiRussian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhikauryashika82
 
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptxBasic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptxDenish Jangid
 
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptxheathfieldcps1
 
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsTechSoup
 
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdfClass 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdfAyushMahapatra5
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdfQucHHunhnh
 
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphThiyagu K
 

Último (20)

Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptxUnit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
 
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SDMeasures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
 
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
2024-NATIONAL-LEARNING-CAMP-AND-OTHER.pptx
 
Role Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptx
Role Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptxRole Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptx
Role Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptx
 
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptxUnit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
 
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptxUnit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
Unit-IV- Pharma. Marketing Channels.pptx
 
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfHoldier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
 
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptxINDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
INDIA QUIZ 2024 RLAC DELHI UNIVERSITY.pptx
 
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
 
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and ModeMeasures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
 
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
This PowerPoint helps students to consider the concept of infinity.
 
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning ExhibitSociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
Sociology 101 Demonstration of Learning Exhibit
 
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in DelhiRussian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
 
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
 
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptxBasic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
 
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptxThe basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
The basics of sentences session 3pptx.pptx
 
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
 
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdfClass 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
 
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
 

Slide share soliqua 070320

  • 1. iGlar and lixisenatide simultaneous versus sequential administration: comparison of LixiLan and GetGoal Duo trials Published in full: Rosenstock J et al. Propensity score matched comparative analyses of simultaneously administered fixed lixisenatide (iGlarLixi) vs sequential administration of insulin glargine and lixisenatide in uncontrolled type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 2018;20:2821 2829 Presented as posters at EASD 2017: Rosenstock J et al. Diabetologia 2017;60(Suppl. 1):1 608 ePoster 795 Meier J et al. Diabetologia 2017;60(Suppl. 1):1 608 ePoster 808 Simultaneous versus sequential: Objective and methods Rosenstock J et al. Diabetes Obes Metab 2018;20:2821 2829 Objective To conduct two exploratory analyses to compare indirectly the efficacy and safety of simultaneous administration of iGlar and lixisenatide as a single-pen, titratable, fixed- ratio combination (iGlarLixi, LixiLan trials) versus sequential administration of iGlar + lixisenatide (GetGoal Duo trials) in people with T2D Methods Indirect exploratory PSM comparison of simultaneous versus sequential administration iGlar + lixisenatide (GetGoal Duo-1) versus iGlarLixi (LixiLan-O) in insulin-naïve patients with OAD failure iGlar + lixisenatide (GetGoal Duo-2) and iGlarLixi (LixiLan-L) in patients with basal insulin failure Baseline covariates for PSM included age, race, BMI, HbA1c, FPG, diabetes duration, and OAD/metformin use BMI, body mass index; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; PSM, propensity-score matching; OAD, oral antidiabetes drug; T2D, type 2 diabetes
  • 2. Simultaneous versus sequential: HbA1c Rosenstock J et al. Diabetes Obes Metab 2018;20:2821 2829 The mean change from baseline in HbA1c with simultaneous iGlarLixi was significantly greater compared with iGlar + lixisenatide for both PSM comparisons iGlarLixi iGlar + lixisenatide 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 79% 51% p<0.0001 p<0.0001 62% 33% LixiLan-O LixiLan-LGetGoal Duo-1 GetGoal Duo-2 n indicates the number of patients included in analysis (mITT population); there were small variations in the number of patients meeting the criteria for inclusion in LixiLan and GetGoal Duo mITT populations based on variable measured HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; mITT, modified intent-to-treat; PSM, propensity-score matching; SD, standard deviation Simultaneous versus sequential: Change in weight and dose Rosenstock J et al. Diabetes Obes Metab 2018;20:2821 2829 Weight reduction was greater with iGlarLixi compared with iGlar + lixisenatide; the difference was significant for LixiLan-O versus GetGoal Duo-1 Patients given iGlar + lixisenatide had a higher mean insulin dose compared with those given iGlarLixi for both PSM comparisons; baseline insulin dose was significantly different between LixiLan-L and GetGoal Duo-2 iGlarLixi iGlar + lixisenatide n indicates the number of patients included in analysis (mITT population); there were small variations in the number of patients meeting the criteria for inclusion in LixiLan and GetGoal Duo mITT populations based on variable measured. *No LS mean difference or p-value has been included for the comparison of the final mean iGlar dose at end of treatment period in LixiLan-L versus GetGoal Duo-2 as mean insulin doses showed significant difference at baseline (66 32 U vs 35 9 U; p<0.0001) LS, least squares; mITT, modified intent-to-treat; PSM, propensity-score matching
  • 3. Simultaneous versus sequential: Time to control Rosenstock J et al. Diabetes Obes Metab 2018;20:2821 2829 Time (95% CI) to first HbA1c value <53 mmol/mol (<7.0%) LixiLan-O versus GetGoal Duo-1 LixiLan-L versus GetGoal Duo-2 iGlarLixi iGlar + lixisenatide The median time to achieve target HbA1c: LixiLan-O versus GetGoal Duo-1: 57 versus 58 days for iGlarLixi and iGlar + lixisenatide LixiLan-L versus GetGoal Duo-2: 85 versus 192 days for iGlarLixi and iGlar + lixisenatide (p<0.0001) For LixiLan-O versus GetGoal Duo-1, after the median time, more patients reached target HbA1c sooner with iGlarLixi compared with iGlar + lixisenatide (p=0.005) The likelihood of achieving glycemic control was significantly higher with iGlarLixi versus iGlar + lixisenatide (LixiLan-O vs GetGoal Duo-1: HR 1.6, 95% CI: 1.1 2.3; LixiLan-O vs GetGoal Duo-2: HR 2.2, 95% CI: 1.8 2.8) CI, confidence interval; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; HR, hazard ratio; NE, non-evaluable Simultaneous versus sequential: Adverse events Rosenstock J et al. Diabetes Obes Metab 2018;20:2821 2829 LixiLan-O vs GetGoal Duo-1 LixiLan-L vs GetGoal Duo-2 iGlarLixi (n=87) iGlar + lixisenatide (n=87) iGlarLixi (n=239)a iGlar + lixisenatide (n=241)b AE, n (%) 52 (59.8) 62 (71.3)b 130 (54.4) 179 (74.3)b Serious AE, n (%) 2 (2.3) 5 (5.7) 15 (6.3) 8 (3.3) AE leading to death, n (%) 1 (1.1) 0 1 (0.4) 1 (0.4) AE leading to discontinuation, n (%) 6 (6.9) 5 (5.7) 10 (4.2) 12 (5.0) Gastrointestinal AEs Diarrhea 7 (8.0) 4 (4.6) 12 (5.0) 16 (6.6) Leading to discontinuation 0 0 0 0 Nausea 8 (9.2) 18 (20.7) 24 (10.0) 65 (27.0) Leading to discontinuation 1 (1.1) 1 (1.1) 4 (1.7) 3 (1.2) Vomiting 1 (1.1) 9 (10.3) 8 (3.3) 21 (8.7) Leading to discontinuation 0 2 (2.3) 0 4 (1.7) a n=241 pairs were matched based on randomized patients regardless of their protocol adherence; however, two patients in the iGlarLixi cohort did not meet the safety population criteria (did not receive at least one dose of study drug) b Symptomatic hypoglycemia was included in the AE listing for GetGoal Duo-1 and GetGoal Duo-2 c AE, adverse event
  • 4. LixiLan-O versus GetGoal-1: percentage of patients with a symptomatic hypoglycemia event was lower for iGlarLixi versus iGlar + lixisenatide; no events of severe symptomatic hypoglycemia occurred LixiLan-L versus GetGoal-2: despite greater HbA1c reductions with iGlarLixi, similar proportions experienced symptomatic hypoglycemia events in both arms; two events (0.8%) of severe hypoglycemia occurred with iGlarLixi versus no events with iGlar + lixisenatide Simultaneous versus sequential: Hypoglycemia Rosenstock J et al. Diabetes Obes Metab 2018;20:2821 2829 HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin iGlarLixi iGlar + lixisenatide Simultaneous versus sequential: Conclusions Rosenstock J et al. Diabetes Obes Metab 2018;20:2821 2829 iGlarLixi resulted in lower final HbA1c levels and a higher percentage of patients achieving target HbA1c (<53 mmol/mol [<7.0%]) compared with sequential iGlar + lixisenatide Significant body weight reduction occurred with iGlarLixi compared with iGlar + lixisenatide in the LixiLan-O and GetGoal Duo-1 analysis, but not in the analysis of LixiLan-L and GetGoal Duo-2 This suggests that mitigation of insulin-associated weight gain may be more pronounced in patients newly initiating basal insulin compared with patients who have already experienced insulin-associated weight gain Indirect PSM comparisons suggest that early simultaneous treatment with a titratable, fixed-ratio combination of basal insulin and a short-acting GLP-1 RA may be more effective, with better gastrointestinal tolerability and with the potential for more weight loss, than a sequential approach of adding a GLP-1 RA in patients with uncontrolled T2D newly initiating or intensifying basal insulin therapy LixiLan-L primary analysis conclusions LixiLan-O primary analysis conclusionsGLP-1 RA, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; PSM, propensity-score matching; T2D, type 2 diabetes
  • 5. 1 Comparison of iGlarLixi and basal-bolus regimen Efficacy and Safety of iGlarLixi, Fixed-Ratio Combination of Insulin Glargine and Lixisenatide, Compared with Basal-Bolus Regimen in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Propensity Score Matched Analysis IGlarlixi VS Basal Bolus Tabak A et al. Diabetes Ther 2019 2 iGlarLixi and basal-bolus regimen: Objective and methods Tabak A et al. Diabetes Ther 2019 Objective Membandingkan efikasi dan safety iGlarLixi dengan basal-bolus insulin pada patients dengan T2DM yang tidak terkontrol dengan basal insulin Methods Propensity-score matching digunakan utk memilih pasien yang mendapat iGlarLixi di LixiLan-L atau basal bolus di GetGoal Duo-2, berdasarkan umur, jenis kelamin, ras, lama sakit diabetes, and baseline BMI, HbA1c, FPG, dosis insulin , dan penggunaan metformin Endpoints dilihat pada minggu 24 untuk iGlarLixi dan minggu 26 untuk basal bolus, yaitu : HbA1c dan weight change HbA1c <7% (53 mmol/mol), tanpa kenaikan Berat badan dan significant Hypoglycaemia event rates dilihat pada minggu 30 untuk iGlarLixi dan minggu 26 untuk basal bolus; dosis insulin diukur pada akhir minggu 30 untuk iGlarLixi dan minggu 26 untuk basal bolus BMI, body mass index; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; T2D, type 2 diabetes
  • 6. 3 4 iGlarLixi and basal-bolus regimen: HbA1c *The change from baseline in HbA1c and weight were analysed using an MMRM with treatment groups and randomization strata (HbA1c mmol/mol)] at screening and metformin use) as fixed effects, and visit (Week 12 and Week 24/26), baseline by visit interaction, and treatment by visit interaction as covariates CI, confidence interval; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; MMRM, mixed-effect model with repeated measures; SE, standard error Penurunan HbA1c lebih besar pada kelompok Iglarlixi (1.02%) dibandingkan kelompok basal bolus (0.74%)
  • 7. 5 iGlarLixi and basal-bolus regimen: weight change *The change from baseline in HbA1c and weight were analysed using an MMRM with treatment groups and randomization strata (HbA1c mmol/mol)] at screening and metformin use) as fixed effects, and visit (Week 12 and Week 24/26), baseline by visit interaction, and treatment by visit interaction as covariates CI, confidence interval; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; MMRM, mixed-effect model with repeated measures; SE, standard error Terjadi penurunan berat badan sebanyak 0.62 kg pada Kelompok iGlarLixi dan kenaikan berat badan 0.70 kg pada kelompok basal bolus 6 iGlarLixi and basal-bolus regimen: Proportions reaching individual endpoints 0 iGlarLixi (n=194) Basal bolus (n=194) Hypoglycaemia was defined as documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia (plasma glucose concentration <54 mg/dL [3 mmol/L]) *p<0.01 from Cochran Mantel Haenszel test for the weighted difference between treatment groups in all categories (randomization strata of HbA1c [<8.0%, HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin The proportions of patients reaching individual endpoints were higher with iGlarLixi compared with basal bolus Proporsi pasien yang mencapai target individual endpoint secara konsisten lebih tinggi pada kelompok Iglarlixi Vs Basal Bolus
  • 8. 7 iGlarLixi and basal-bolus regimen: Proportions reaching composite endpoints Hypoglycaemia was defined as documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia (plasma glucose concentration <54 mg/dL [3 mmol/L]) *p<0.01 from Cochran Mantel Haenszel test for the weighted difference between treatment groups in all categories (randomization strata of HbA1c [<8.0%, HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin The proportions of patients reaching composite endpoints were higher with iGlarLixi compared with basal bolus iGlarLixi (n=194) Basal bolus (n=194) Proporsi pasien yang mencapai target individual endpoint secara konsisten lebih tinggi pada kelompok Iglarlixi Vs Basal Bolus 8 iGlarLixi and basal-bolus regimen: Hypoglycaemia and insulin dose iGlarLixi (n=194) Basal-bolus (n=195) Hypoglycaemia was defined as documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia mmol/L]) *p-values were estimated from Poisson regression with treatment as a fixed factor and log value of patient-years of exposure as an offset variable iGlarLixi (n=194) Basal bolus (n=194) Baseline, mean (SD) 39 (8) 38 (11) Week 30/26, mean (SD) 49 (11) 53 (23) LS mean (SE) change from baseline 9 (1) 14 (1) LS mean treatment difference ± SE (95% CI) 5 ± 1 (2, 8) p-value 0.0003 Hypoglycaemia events per patient-year Average daily insulin dose Observed cases are used for this analysis. Based on MMRM with treatment groups and randomization strata (HbA1c mmol/mol)] at screening and metformin use) as fixed effects, and visit (Week 2, Week 6, Week 12, and Week 30/26), baseline by visit interaction, and treatment by visit interaction as covariates CI, confidence interval; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; LS, least squares; MMRM, mixed-effect model with repeated measures; SD, standard deviation; SE, standard error Rate terjadinya hipoglikemia lebih rendah pada iglarlixi dibandingkan basal bolus Insulin dosis lebih rendah pada iglalixi dibandingkan Basal Bolus
  • 9. 9 iGlarLixi and basal-bolus regimen: Kesimpulan Treatment dengan iGlarLixi berhubungan dengan penurunan berat badan, penurunan HbA1c lebih besar, dan lebih sedikit kejadian hypoglycaemia dibandingkan dengan basal-bolus regimen iGlarLixi berhubungan dengan lebih banyak pasien yang mencapai target HbA1c <7% [53 mmol/mol]) dan composite endpoints Hal ini dapat dicapai dengan injeksi 1 kali sehari (iglarlixi) versus multiple injeksi untuk basal-bolus insulin Pada pasien T2DM tidak terkontrol dengan basal insulin, intensifikasi dengan iGlarLixi memiliki efikasi lebih, ditoleransi baik dan lebih simple dibandingkan dengan switching ke basal bolus HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; T2D, type 2 diabetes
  • 10. LixiLan-L SAID.SQA.19.04.0145/(04/19) Hanya Metformin yang dilanjutkan pada fase run-in DESIGN: Randomized, open-label, parallel-group, 30-week treatment trial 6-week run-in phase Insulin glargine 100 U/mL (iGlar) Metformin Dosis insulin disesuaikan untuk mencapai GD Puasa target (80 to 100 mg/dL) and capped to 60 U/day pada kedua groups iGlarLixi Metformin 30-minggu treatment period Pasien Diabetes tipe 2 dengan Basal insulin >6 bulan Dosis stabil 15 40 U/d ± OADs HbA1c 10% GD puasa 200 mg/dL n=367 7% HbA1c % GD Puasa Dosis iGlar n=369 Inisiasi iGlar dan atau titrasi FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin OAD, oral antidiabetic drug; U, unit Aroda VR, et al. Diabetes Care 2016;39:1972 80
  • 11. iGlarLixi adalah self-injected, diberikan 1x sehari, pemberian dalam 1 jam (0 60 min) sebelum sarapan Setelah 2 minggu dalam dosis stabil, dosis di titrasi sekali dalam seminggu untuk mencapai target puasa SMPG of 4.4 to 5.6 mmol/L (80 to 100 mg/dL), mencegah hipoglikemia. Pasien di random ke iGlarLixi PEN B Dosis iGlar dari 30 U hingga 60 U; dosis awal 30 U PEN A Dosis iGlar dari 10 hingga 40 U; dosis awal 10 U per hari Dosis iGlar U/day sebelum randomisasi Dosis iGlar <30 U/day sebelum randomisasi SMPG, self-measured plasma glucose Aroda VR, et al. Diabetes Care 2016;39:1972 80 For statistical analysis of the study endpoints, a step-down testing procedure was applied to control for type 1 error PPG, postprandial glucose PRIMARY Superioritas dari iGlarLixi dibandingkan iGlar 100 U/mL dalam perubahan HbA1c pada minggu ke 30 SECONDARY Superioritas dari iGlarLixi dibandingkan iGlar pada: 2 jam perjalanan glukosa plasma Berat badan 7-point SMPG Persentase pada pasien dengan HbA1c <7% dan tanpa peningkatan berat badan Dosis iGlar Persentase pada pasien dengan HbA1c <7% dan tanpa peningkatan berat badan dan/atau tanpa hipoglikemi simptomatik Gula darah Puasa Tambahan secondary endpoints termasuk: Persentase responden dengan HbA1c <7% dan Persentase pasien dengan HbA1c <7%, tanpa kenaikan berat badan pada minggu 30 and tidak ada resiko hipoglikemia simptomatik SAFETY Didokumentasi hipoglikemi simptomatik Kejadian efek samping Aroda VR, et al. Diabetes Care 2016;39:1972 80
  • 12. iGlarLixi (n=367) iGlar (n=369) Usia (years) 59.6 (9.4) 60.3 (8.7) Wanita (%) 55.0 51.5 Caucasian/Black (%) 92/5 92/6 Berat badan (kg) at Baseline 87.7 (14.5) 87.1 (14.8) BMI (kg/m2) at Baseline 31.3 (4.3) 31.0 (4.2) Durasi Diabetes (years) 12.0 (6.6) 12.1 (6.9) Durasi penggunaan Basal Insulin (years) 3.1 (3.1) 3.3 (3.1) Jenis Basal insulin at Screening (%) iGlar 64 65 Detemir 13 15 NPH 23 20 OAD use at Screening (%) None 5 5 Metformin 46 52 Sulfonylurea (SU) 4 4 DPP-4 inhibitor 1 1 Metformin + SU 37 32 Metformin + DPP-4 inhibitor 5 5 BMI, body mass index; DPP-4, dipeptidyl peptidase 4; NPH, neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin; SU, sulfonylurea Aroda VR, et al. Diabetes Care 2016;39:1972 80 iGlarLixi (n=367) iGlar (n=369) HbA1c (%) Screening 8.5 8.5 Baseline 8.1 8.1 FPG, mmol/L Screening 7.9 8 Baseline 7.3 7.4 iGlar dose (U) Start of run in 27.3 27.7 End of run in 35.0 35.2 Aroda VR, et al. Diabetes Care 2016;39:1972 80
  • 13. 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 0.62 iGlar HbA1c selama studi (%) Modified intent-to-treat population *Weighted average of proportion difference between treatment groups BL, baseline; CI, confidence interval; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; LS, least squares; LOCF, last observation carried forward; S, screening; SE, standard error LS mean difference 95% CI, p-value 0.52 ( 0.633 to 0.397) p<0.0001 iGlarLixi 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 Week iGlarLixi iGlar 6.9% 7.5% S BL 8 12 24 30 30 LOCF 1.13LS mean change HbA1c <7% HbA1c 25.5%* 95% CI: 18.9% 32.1% p<0.0001 19.8%* 95% CI: 13.9% 25.6% p<0.0001 iGlarLixi iGlar 55 34 30 14 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Target HbA1c minggu ke 30 2 1 1 2 3 0 BL 4 8 12 18 24 30 30 LOCF Time (weeks) iGlarLixi iGlar +0.7 kg 0.7 kg Body weight (kg) change from baseline to Week 30 -85.1 -70.2 -25.1 -8.4 95% CI: 70.7 to 52.9 p<0.0001 61.8* 2-hr PPGa (mg/dL) Excursiona (mg/dL) 60.0 95% CI: 70.1 to 50.0 Modified intent-to-treat population; ANCOVA for PPG analyses; MMRM for body weight analyses aStandardized liquid breakfast meal *LS mean difference vs iGlar ANCOVA, analysis of covariance; CI, confidence interval; LOCF, last observation carried forward; LS, least squares; MMRM, mixed-effect model with repeated measures; PPG, postprandial glucose; SE, standard error
  • 14. Safety population E/p-y, event/patient-year; GI, gastrointestinal Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia E/p-y 0.02 < 0.01 iGlarLixi (n = 469) iGlar (n = 467) Nausea 38 (10.4) 2 (0.5) Discontinuation 4 (1.1) 0 Vomiting 13 (3.6) 2 (0.5) Discontinuation 2 (0.4) 0 Diarrhea 16 (4.4) 10 (2.7) Discontinuation 0 0 All data are n (%) Efek samping GI iGlarLixi iGlar 40 42.5 0 10 20 30 40 50 34.2 31.7 19.9 13.4 18.6 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 9.0 HbA1c <7% tanpa peningkatan berat badan di minggu ke 30 HbA1c <7% tanpa peninmgkatan berat badan di minggu 30 dan Tanpa hipoglikemia didokumentasi HbA1c <7% tanpa hipoglikemi didokumentasi 20.8%* 95% CI: 15.0 to 26.7 p<0.0001 13.2%* 95% CI: 7.1 to 19.3 10.9%* 95% CI: 5.9 to 16.0 p<0.0001 mITT population *Weighted average of proportion difference between treatment groups; No p-value available as comparison not specified in step-down testing procedure Aroda VR, et al. Diabetes Care 2016;39:1972 80 iGlarLixi (n=366) iGlar (n=365)
  • 15. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Week Aroda V, et al. ADA 2016 congress, scientific sessions webcast. Available at: http://professional.diabetes.org/webcasts-ss2016, last accessed 10 May 2017 Average daily Insulin dose (U) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112 15 18 21 24 27 30 30 LOCF Run-in start Randomization -4 mITT population iGlarLixi (n=366) iGlar (n=365) iGlar dose (U) iGlarLixi (n=365) iGlar (n=365) Start of run-in 28 29 End of run-in 35 35 Week 30 (LOCF) 46 47 *LS mean change in HbA1c from baseline to Week 30. Proportion of patients affected by documented symptomatic hypoglycemia - vs iGlar-treated groups. Mean change in weight from baseline to Week 30. Proportion of patients who discontinued iGlarLixi treatment as a result of gastrointestinal (GI) treatment-emergent adverse events. 1. Aroda VR et al. Diabetes Care. 2016;39:1972-1980. Penurunan HbA1c yang signifikan pada minggu ke 30 1.1%* Similar Hipoglikemia 40.0 vs 42.5% Tanpa peningkatan berat badan 0.7 kg Efek samping GI yang lebih rendah dibandingkan dengan lixisenatide, yang menyebabkan penghentian pengobatan 1.1%§
  • 16. 1 LixiLan-O primary methods and results Published in full: Rosenstock JR et al. Benefits of LixiLan, a titratable fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine plus lixisenatide, versus insulin glargine and lixisenatide monocomponents in type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on oral agents: the LixiLan-O randomized trial. Diabetes Care 2016;39:2026 2035 LixiLan-O Iglarlixi memperlihatkan statistical superiority dibanding insulin glargine 100 units/mL atau lixisenatide pada penurunan HbA1c pada pasien DM tipe 2 yang sebelumnya mendapat metformin OAD lain, dengan profil safety sebanding dengan insulin glargine 100 units/mL dan lixisenatide1 2 aStop OAD ke-2/titrasi metformin hingga paling tidak 2000 mg/hari atau dosis maximal yg ditoleransi hari sebelum randomisasi) 4-weeka run-in phase Lixi + metformin iGlar + metformin iGlar dose adjusted to self-monitored FPG target (80 100 mg/dL) and capped to 60 U/day in the iGlarLixi and iGlar groups iGlarLixi + metformin 30-week treatment period 10 20 Up to 2-week screening LixiLan-O: Pasien DM Tipe 2 yang tidak terkontrol dengan OAD (NCT02058147) Rosenstock J et al. Diabetes Care 2016;39:2026 2035 DESIGN: Randomized, open-label, active controlled, 3-arm parallel-group trial Pasien DM tipe 2 dengan: Metformin saja atau kombinasi dengan OAD ke-2 HbA1c: 7.0% 9.0% (jika dgn 2 OAD) 7.5% 10% (jika dgn metformin saja ) n = 234 n = 469 n = 467 FPG, fasting plasma glucose; HbA1c, glycated hemoglobin; OAD, oral antidiabetic drug; T2D, type 2 diabetes
  • 17. 3 Objectives and endpoints PRIMARY Perubahan HbA1c di minggu 30: Superiority of iGlarLixi over Lixisenatide AND Non-inferiority of iGlarLixi over iGlar (non inferiority margin: 0.3%) Once shown, superiority can be tested (included in testing hierarchy) SECONDARY Efek iGlarLixi vs iGlar dan lixisenatide pada: Ekskursi glukosa 2 jam pp dan 2 jam PP Berat badan 7-point SMPG GDP Persentase responder yang mencapai Persentase responder yang mencapai HbA1c <7% tanpa kenaikan berat badan Persentase responder yang mencapai HbA1c <7% tanpa documented, symptomatic hypoglycemia Persentase responder yang mencapai HbA1c <7% tanpa kenaikan berat badan, dan documented, symptomatic hypoglycemia Dosis iGlar SAFETY Documented, symptomatic hypoglycemia Insidens adverse events Rosenstock J, et al. Diabetes Care 2016;39:2026 35 For statistical analysis of the study endpoints, a step-down testing procedure was applied to control for type 1 error PPG, postprandial glucose 4 Rosenstock J, et al. Diabetes Care 2016;39:2026 35 Sanofi data on file, CSR HOE901/AVE0010-EFC12404 v1:pages 78, 80 iGlarLixi (n=469) iGlar (n=467) Lixisenatide (n=234) All (N=1170) Age (years) 58.2 (9.5) 58.3 (9.4) 58.7 (8.7) 58.4 (9.3) Male/female (%) 47.3/52.7 50.7/49.3 56.8/43.2 50.6/49.4 Caucasian/Black (%) 88.9/7.0 90.1/7.1 92.3/5.1 90.1/6.7 Diabetes duration (years) 8.9 (5.5) 8.7 (5.6) 8.9 (6.3) 8.8 (5.7) BMI (kg/m2) 31.6 (4.4) 31.7 (4.5) 32.0 (4.4) 31.7 (4.4) % P kg/m2 62.9 61.7 67.9 63.4 HbA1c (%) at screening 8.2 (0.7) 8.2 (0.7) 8.3 (0.7) 8.2 (0.7) HbA1c (%) at randomization 8.1 (0.7) 8.1 (0.7) 8.2 (0.7) 8.1 (0.7) % Patients with HbA1c 55.9 55.7 56.0 55.8 FPG, mmol/L (mg/dL) 9.9 (178) 9.8 (176) 9.8 (176) 9.8 (177) Metformin dose (baseline) (mg) 2246 (457) 2245 (445) 2267 (427) 2250 (446) Second OAD use at screening (%) 58.4 57.8 56.8 57.9 Sulfonylurea 55.2 53.3 52.6 53.9 Glinide 0.6 2.1 2.1 1.5 SGLT-2 inhibitor 0.4 0.4 0 0.3 DPP-4 inhibitor 2.6 2.4 2.1 2.4 BMI, body mass index; DPP-4, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 SGLT-2, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 Demographics and baseline characteristics
  • 18. 5 LixiLan-O: Algoritme titrasi iGlarLixi adalah terapi injeksi yang diberikan 1x sehari, pemberian dalam 1jam sebelum sarapan Setelah 2 minggu dalam dosis stabil, dosis dititrasi sekali seminggu untuk mencapai GDP 80 sampai 100 mg/dL), mencegah hipoglikemia Semua pasien dirandom mulai dengan PEN A PEN B (ratio of 3 U : 1 µg) Dosis iGlar dari 30 U hingga 60 U; digunakan untuk pasien yang menggunakan dosis 41 60 U PEN A (ratio of 2 U : 1 µg) Dosis iGlar dari 10 hingga 40 U; dosis awal 10 U per hari SMPG, self-measured plasma glucose Rosenstock J, et al. Diabetes Care 2016;39:2026 35 6 LixiLan-O: Key Result HbA1c reduction 1.6 1.3 0.9 -1.8 -1.6 -1.4 -1.2 -1.0 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 LSmeanchange(%) iGlarLixi iGlar Lixisenatide p<0.0001 p<0.0001 Patients at target HbA1c 74 5659 40 33 19 0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 HbA1c <7% Proportionofpatients (%) 14.3* 40.6* 16.4* 36.4* 0.3 1.1 2.3 -3.0 -2.0 -1.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 LSmeanchange(kg) Weight change 1.4* 95% CI: 1.9, 0.9 2.0 95% CI: 1.4, 2.6 Baseline 89.4 89.8 90.8 Hypoglycemia § 25.6 23.6 6.4 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 Patients with events (%) No. of events per patient year 1.4 1.2 0.3 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 FPG change 3.5 3.3 1.5 -4.0 -3.5 -3.0 -2.5 -2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 LSmeanchange (mmol/L) 0.2 95% CI: 0.4, 0.04 2.0 95% CI: 2.2, 1.7 hypoglycemia dL § One event of severe hypoglycemia was reported during the study and occurred in the iGlar group Rosenstock J, et al. Diabetes Care 2016;39:2026 35 2-hour PPG reduction 2.4 95% CI: 2.8, 2.0 1.1 95% CI: 1.6, 0.6 5.7 3.3 4.6 -6.0 -5.0 -4.0 -3.0 -2.0 -1.0 0.0 LSmeanchange (mmol/L)
  • 19. 7 Profil 7-point SMPG 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Mean±SE Baseline Week 30 mmol/L mg/dL 234 216 198 180 162 144 126 108 90 Pre-breakfast 2-hour post-breakfast Pre-lunch Pre-dinner 2-hour post-dinner Bedtime2-hour post-lunch mITT population Mean change in 7-point SMPG Rosenstock J, et al. Diabetes Care 2016;39:2026 35 iGlarLixi (n=468) iGlar (n=466) Lixisenatide (n=233) Penurunan Glukosa harian (seven-point SMPG) lebih besar pada kelompok Iglarlixi dibandingan Iglar dan lixi 8 Rata rata dosis insulin harian 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Mean±SE Week Average daily Insulin dose (U) 40 U 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 30 LOCF Sanofi data on file, CSR HOE901/AVE0010-EFC12404 v1:pages 109 10 mITT population iGlarLixi (n=468) iGlar (n=466) Dosis insulin harian sama antara iglarlixi dan iglar
  • 20. 9 Pasien mencapai composite endpoints 31.8 18.9 27.9 26.2 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Proportionofpatients(%) HbA1c <7% with no body weight gain HbA1c <7% with no body weight gain and no documented 18.1%* 95% CI: 12.2 to 24.0 p<0.0001 15.2%* 95% CI: 8.1 to 22.4 13.0%* 95% CI: 7.5 to 18.5 p<0.0001 5.6%* 95% CI: 1.3 to 12.6 mITT population *Weighted average of proportion difference between treatment groups No p-value available as comparison not specified in step-down testing procedure 43.2 25.1 Rosenstock J, et al. Diabetes Care 2016;39:2026 35 iGlarLixi (n=468) iGlar (n=466) Lixisenatide (n=233) Lebih banyak pasien yang mencapai composite endpoint pada Iglarlixi dibanding iglar dan lixi 10 Profil safety Patients, n (%), with iGlarLixi (n=469) iGlar (n=467) Lixisenatide (n=233) TEAE Any 267 (56.9%) 227 (48.6%) 157 (67.4%) Serious 18 (3.8%) 19 (4.1%) 9 (3.9%) Leading to Death 2 (0.4%) 3 (0.6%) 1 (0.4%) Leading to Discontinuation 12 (2.6%) 9 (1.9%) 21 (9.0%) GI TEAEs Nausea 45 (9.6%) 17 (3.6%) 56 (24.0%) discontinuation 2 (0.4%) 0 6 (2.6%) Vomiting 15 (3.2%) 7 (1.5%) 15 (6.4%) discontinuation 2 (0.4%) 0 4 (1.7%) Diarrhea 42 (9.0%) 20 (4.3%) 21 (9.0%) discontinuation 1 (0.2%) 0 2 (0.9%) Safety population Data analyses are descriptive TEAE, treatment emergent adverse event Rosenstock J, et al. Diabetes Care 2016;39:2026 35 Mual dan muntah lebih jarang terjadi pada igalrlixi dibanding Lixisenatide
  • 21. 11 Kesimpulan Tercapainya Primary endpoint yaitu superiority iGlarLixi dalam menurunkan HbA1c versus iGlar dan Lixisenatide iGlarLixi dikombinasi dengan metformin: Penurunan HbA1c dari 8.1% menjadi 6.5% menurunkan 2h-PPG dan ekskursi glucosa Mencegah kenaikan berat badan ( 0.3 kg) dan selisih perubahan berat badan dengan kelompok Iglar adalah 1.4 kg (p<0.0001) Sebanyak 74% pasien mencapai HbA1c <7% 43% HbA1c <7% tanpa kenaikan berat badan 32% HbA1c <7%, tanpa kenaikan berat badan dan documented hypoglycemia Rosenstock J, et al. Diabetes Care 2016;39:2026 35 12 Kesimpulan insiden kelompok iGlarLixi dan iGlar dan lebih rendah pada kelompok Lixisenatide Secara umum, iGlarLixi dapat ditoleransi dengan profil safety sama dengan kelompok iGlar dan Lixisenatide Mual dan muntah lebih jarang terjadi pada igalrlixi dibanding Lixisenatide Rosenstock J, et al. Diabetes Care 2016;39:2026 35