3. Women non-operating landowners
Non-operating landowner (NOL)
âą Woman non-operating landowner (WNOL)
Operating landowner/Owner-operator
âą Operator = Farmer
Scenarios for rented land â
âą Farmer farms only the land s/he owns
âą Farmer does not own land â rents all
âą Farmer farms âhome groundâ plus rents land
âą Farmer farms âhome groundâ, farms rented land AND
rents land out to other farmers!
So who owns the rented land?
8. Slicing the pie furtherâŠ
Women/Men?
Nationally (48 states):
âą 37% of all principal landlords are
women
âą They owned 10% of ag lands (25% of
rented lands)
âą Women tend to be older
Iowa*:
âą 47% of farmland owned/co-owned by
women
âą 61% of the rented land owned/co-
owned by women
âą Women tend to be older
*2007 Farmland ownership & Tenure in Iowa
Non-operator landowners
Nearly 301 million acres of U.S.
landâabout a third of the nation's
land in farmsâare now farmed or
co-farmed by women
9. Why focus on women NOLs?
âą Women own a lot of land that is rented out (more than
their male counterparts)
âą The percentage of women who own land is expected to
increase in the next decade as more women inherit
farmland from spouses & parents (Eells & Adcock 2012, Parsons
et al. 2010)
From Carolyn 2005, Eells et al. 2008, Breghendal & Hoffman
2011, Secchi et al. 2014:
âą Women are particularly interested in conservation
âą Deeply committed to healthy farmland, healthy farm
families and healthy farm communities
âą Under represented in farmland conservation programs
10. Women Caring for the LandSM
âą Started by WFAN in 2008
in recognition that
women own or co-own
half the land but arenât
engaged in conservation
programs.
âą The women arenât
broken, we need to fix the
communication system,
and itâs easy.
16. 50 to 70% act!
âIf Iâd known it
would be so much
fun Iâd have
brought friends.â
âThank you for explaining it
in a way I can understand.â
âThis is great to have
discussions instead of
being âtalked at.â
"I've attended several other meetings about this and I really liked how
this one was set up ... There were opportunities to ask questions at
the others but they were mostly just directed to the speaker. Here we
could ask each other and had a discussion ... I learned so much from
the other women."
âWhen advised that I was going to
women's land owner meetings and had
been to the FSA office, my renter began
to do what he KNEW he should have been
doing all along.â
17. Results from CIG
âą Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, Wisconsin 2013-
2016
âą 63 meetings, 864 Women Land Owner attendees, after meeting
evaluations 88% return rate
âą Attendees/meeting 21
âą Women landowner attendees per meeting 14
âą 201,691 acres
âą Average of 294 acres among women landowner participants across all 7
states.
19. 84% reported increase in confidence
âą âI came to learn what I
can so I can contribute
to conversations about
the farm. If you donât
know, you donât have a
voice.â Delyne
20. I only knew a little before and learned a little
more today. Itâs a process! This was a wonderful
building block and helpful because the rest of the
room wasnât all old white guys or cocky young
white guys! Wonderful open environment.
Farmington, MN
Field visit was most beneficial. As an employee of FSA
I got to see what established practices look like.
Illinois
Itâs real, it happens at all ages
Partners benefit
21. âWere you inspired to take any action after the meeting such as:
visiting with your farmer, business partners, or family members
about what you learned?â
64% said YES, 36% said NO
Table 2. Action(s) Taken as Result of attending Learning
Circle
# of
mentions Percent
Spoke with family member or acquaintance 33 40%
Spoke with farmer 17 20%
Implemented new conservation practice 15 18%
Reached out to conservation staff or organization 10 12%
Hired or fired management or operators or changed lease 4 5%
Enrollment in assistance program 3 4%
Visited land more frequently 1 1%
Total number of actions taken 83 100%
22. âI think the biggest thing was just sharing with him the different
activities and programs, the things that people are doing, I donât think
that we did anything different, but it was more of an awareness about
some of the opportunitiesâŠ. but it did prompt me to talk to him about
those things a little bit more because thatâs one thing that heâs just
kind of always taken care of, because obviously thatâs his area and that
kind of thing, but it did prompt more discussions, and gave me the
tools I needed to ask some questions about why we were doing things
the way we were. But it didnât necessarily change anything.â
âAfter I learned about cover crops, I said this is the way to go. And I did
read about it, and theyâre saying like in 3 to 5 years that the tide turns
and it becomes very profitable to do that if everything goes according
to plan, and I asked them once, would they be interested in doing
cover crops, and definitely they were not.â
What if we try more than one learning circle?
24. Becky Fletcher, NRCS State Public Affairs Specialist
2017 Soil and Water Conservation Society Annual Conference
Indianaâs Success
Womenâs Learning Circles
25. Why USDA NRCS Is Involved
Reach out to all of
our underserved
communities,
resulting in trust
and full
participation in all
NRCS programs.
26. Meet Sara Creech
âI love the idea of getting together with women. They are the
movers and the shakers and keep the community strong.â
30. What Have You Been Inspired to Do?
âSoil and water conservation is
important, especially with
decreasing resources. I want to do
everything I can with available
resources to preserve the land.â
Angie Williams, Hendricks County
âIâve heard about conservation
practices like no till and have been
doubtful, but this workshop has
changed my mind. Iâm going to
adopt these practices and use the
available resources to make it
happen.â Martha Avery, Rush and
Henry Counties
31. Take Aways From Womenâs Learning Circles
âI have 130 acres of land that has been
in the family since 1863. I was able to
network and find out what others are
doing on their property. Conservation
has always been a part of me, and Iâm
working to restore the land to its
natural habitat. It was a great
opportunity to meet others who feel
the same way.â Lou Nash, Tipton
County
âThe program offered an opportunity
to learn about woodland management.
We have 47 acres of woodland, and I
learned about the organizations
available to offer help.â Carol Reisert,
Carroll County
âWe have 40 acres near South Bend that
is part farm, part woodland and part
wetland. I got information that will help
us restore it to close to what it used to
be. There are a lot of resources out there
if you know how to get to those
resources, and this meeting helped with
that.â Patty Fowler, St. Joseph County
32. âWe had an excellent response from the participants at
the Womenâs Learning Circles. Several have come by the
office or called for more information. Several have applied
for financial assistance to help put in conservation
practices.â Jerod Chew, District Conservationist
33. âThe Womenâs Learning Circles resulted in some excellent
new connections and conservation implementation with a
growing group of landowners and land managers.â Brandy
Daggett, District Conservationist
34. âAfter the learning circle I was invited to spend a few hours out on a
farm owned by two of the women. Prior to the meeting, they didn't
know NRCS existed and now they are thinking about CRP and EQIP.
Both ladies are very excited about soil health and making
improvements on their farm.â Ashley Linville, District Conservationist
35.
36.
37. Questions on the effectiveness of
learning circles?
Part III:
Building a Movement
40. âą Indianaâs Program Based on WFAN Methodology
âą Steering Committee Made up of all Conservation
Partners, plus AFT and Women Farmers
âą Paid State Coordinator (PT)
âą 3 Subcommittees â Funding, Marketing, Training
41. Women for the Land â national!
âŠto empowers women landowners to adopt
environmentally sound farming practices, protect
farmland and improve the viability of their farms
1. Research to better understand landowners and the
barriers they face
2. Learning circles to improve engagement of women
in conservation
3. Technical assistance and policy reform to better
serve their needs
42. Key take homes
âą Success is based on well-researched peer-to-peer
model
âą This is unlike anything youâve every done before
âą The methodology works and weâre continually
testing and improving the methodology
âą Build your support network before you start
âą Conservation, conservation, conservation!
âą Itâs really hard to find this audience â donât get
discouraged!
43. What is YOUR story?
Jean Eells: 515-2978-0701, jeanceells@gmail.com
Jen Filipiak: 515-868-1331, jfilipiak@farmland.org
Becky Fletcher: 317-295-3225, Rebecca.fletcher@in.usda.gov
Notas do Editor
USDA ag census â only surveys operators!
Dark blue- 60% or more leased (compared to 2007 census where highest category was 50%)
In Iowa, across the state, over 60% rented or leased
Note that the darkest colors fairly well correspond with the areas of intensive crop production
Midwest as a region has the highest amount of land owned by non-operator landlords. But this varies a lot by state (Wisconsin only 32% rented). Illinois is the highest in the contiguous 48.
Lots of variation within states howeverâŠ
Wisconsin only 32% rented
Darkest areas in Illinois are 66-82% rented
Darkest areas in Iowa are 63-71%
Coupling with non-operator data⊠The Tenure, Ownership and Transition of Agricultural Land (TOTAL) survey is a study of all agricultural landlords â operators and non-operators â conducted by the USDA Natnl Ag Statistics Service (NASS) in collaboration with the USDA Economic Research Service (ERS). TOTAL is part of the Census of Ag program. NASS released data in August 2015 for calendar year 2014. Only covers contiguous 48 states.
Of the 31%: Individuals = 49%; Partnerships = 19%; Corprations = 11%; Trusts = 18%; Other = 3%
See: Bigelow, Daniel, Allison Borchers, and Todd Hubbs. U.S. Farmland Ownership, Tenure, and Transfer. EIB-161, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, August 2016. Report online at: www.ers.usda.gov/publications/eib-economic-information-bulletin/eib161
We know that 39% of agricultural land in the contiguous 48 states is rented â and most of that (31%) is rented by non-operators â or people who do not farm themselves. What do we know about them â are they interested in conservation? Would they use our help? AFT, working with the Women Food and Agriculture Network started looking into gender and foundâŠ.
Looking at land owned by women vs. men â women are more likely to have more acres rented out.
Thereâs actually a growing body of social science literature on women and farmland ownership, but itâs based in the Midwest.
Female principle operators receive 6.4% of all government payments, but 14% of principle operators are women. And the average payment amount to female farmers is 36.2% less than other farms receiving assistance.
How did this happen? We are not implying that anyone intentionally discriminates against women, or that men arenât interested in conservation. What this points out is two things 1- our primary audience has traditionally been male farmers, and usually white male farmers. So all of our messaging, materials and programs are targeted to our primary audience â thatâs normal. But our audience is changing and we need to change too. 2- Men are interested in conservation too, of course, but all of this data suggests an opportunity for us to engage a new and growing audience â women who own farmland.
Itâs about conservation on the land, how to engage more landowners in taking great care of the land whatever that means and where ever they are. After face-to-face meetings with more than 3200 women we can confirm that the problem isnât with the women, but how in conservation outreach weâve made them feel unwelcome, how weâve excluded them when we didnât realize thatâs what was happening.
Itâs the only program in the USA solely focused on conservation for women. Conservation aspects of all agriculture topics, and all types of conservation.
Learning circles entail a day-long meeting with discussion in the morning and a field tour after lunch. The ladies are there for approximately 6 hours of content. Part of the day is reserved for women only.
The format of the learning circles has made all the difference and after face-to-face meetings with more than 3200 women, we can say there are certain aspects that are central to the method.
Meetings are intentionally kept small, no more than 25 women in the room including conservation professionals.
Everyone sits down in a circle, professionals dispersed, no head of the table.
Everyone introduces themselves by telling about their land â we recognize they have expertise to share.
Contemporary conservation is discussed, nothing watered down, but we approach the content differently and facilitate a discussion rather than PowerPoint lecture.
Field tour â less is more, allow for them to handle the equipment, try judging things for themselves, more time for questions.
Yes, they sometimes talk about their feelings!
Annual surveys,
We asked some easy steps to take and some very hard steps for women to take. The NA column reflects that we had some women farmers and some non-landowners in the groups, which is not a bad thing. Add animation â circle the NA (20 % figures)
An increase in confidence is needed for taking action. Remember we said 50 to 70% of women responding to surveys a year after a meeting took an action to improve conservation on their land.
We measured gains in knowledge and there were improvements in all the aspects of soil health information. In written comments about what was most helpful in the meetings we got many responses indicating that the methods we are using are working. We also were told that they felt welcome in our meetings, and clearly some have felt unwelcome in other circumstances. And a happy outcome is that the partners benefit as well.
Sara is a beginning farmer, a small farmer, an organic farmer and a military veteran
She has a powerful story to tell about how she came to farming. Sheâs located not far outside of Indianapolis on a farm called Blue Yonder where she often hosts military families and others that are interested in learning more about farming.Â
She has participated in three learning circles and has hosted two tours. Because of the learning circles she has learned about farm bill programs has utilized EQIP to install a high tunnel.
She believes in the power of learning circles so much that she serves on the Stateâs steering committee for this program.Â
300 acres of cropland and woodland
Bev is super knowledgeable about conservation stuff already and had utilized EQIP for forestry management practices to remove invasives and planting pollinator habitat
But until she came to her first learning circle she did not truly appreciate her tenant farmer who no-tills her fields. Â She learned about soil health and now is one of our biggest ambassadors for soil health.Â
She loved the learning circle concept and has hosted two tours.
Meet Jane Myers
Jan is a Master Gardener who owns 300 acres of cropland, forestland and some pasture. She leases her land to an excellent conservation farmer enrolled in CSP, but she had little knowledge of NRCS programs and other services available. Because of a learning circle she attended she has recently signed a contract to do forestry improvement on 50 acres of woodlands and will also be installing a high tunnel.
Ruth Miller, a widow for the past 4 or 5 years and in her 80âs. She has 70 acres of cropland, some of it on E and F slopes. She has never been involved with her tenant farmer but as a result of attend two Womenâs Learning Circles (one focused on soil health, the other touched on conservation leases) decided to get involved.Â
Ruth found out her tenant had been using conventional tillage on those steep slopes and had planted soybeans for the past four years in a row â the land was in bad shape.Â
She came in the office and talked to the DC and together they wrote a conservation plan that involves crop rotations and no-till. Her tenant farmer refused to make any changes so she fired him and has bids out for a new farmer.
Ruth says WLCâs gave her information she needed to be confident in talking to her farmer.
National Employment Development Center for NRCS trainings are approved for the future. Women in NRCS and I do them in partnership, we are setting the 2018 schedule.
Jean â make sure to address the certain little things you canât mess with and maintain qualityâŠ
Initial research, pilot meetings, soil health content