https://ssimeetup.org/did-report-2-2nd-official-w3c-did-working-group-meeting-netherlands-drummond-reed-markus-sabadello-webinar-45/
The DID Report 2 about the Second Meeting of the W3C DID Working Group with Drummond Reed and Markus Sabadello from Danube Tech, co-authors of the W3C DID specification.
DID spec co-author Drummond Reed and Markus Sabadello will report back from Amsterdam (The Netherlands) for the second official meeting of the W3C DID Working Group taking place from January 29-31, 2020 to share highlights of the meeting and the roadmap for taking DIDs to a full Web standard.
This session will be followed one hour later by a full DID education session based on the DID chapter published with Manning by IdentityBook.info authors Drummond Reed, Markus Sabadello and Alex Preukschat. If you want to learn all the basics about DIDs please also join this session here: Webinar 46
VIP Model Call Girls NIBM ( Pune ) Call ON 8005736733 Starting From 5K to 25K...
The 2nd Official W3C DID Working Group Meeting (The Netherlands)
1. The DID Report 2 — January 2020
Second Meeting of the W3C DID Working Group in the Netherlands
Drummond Reed
W3C DID specification
co-author
Chief Trust Officer Evernym
This presentation is released under a Creative Commons license. (CC BY-SA 4.0). SSIMeetup.org
Markus Sabadello
W3C DID specification
co-author
Founder Danube Tech
2. 1. Empower global SSI communities
2. Open to everyone interested in SSI
3. All content is shared with CC BY SA
SSIMeetup.org
Alex Preukschat @SSIMeetup @AlexPreukschat
Coordinating Node SSIMeetup.org
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
SSIMeetup objectives
47. This presentation is released under a Creative Commons license. (CC BY-SA 4.0). SSIMeetup.org
48.
49. This presentation is released under a Creative Commons license. (CC BY-SA 4.0). SSIMeetup.org
50. This presentation is released under a Creative Commons license. (CC BY-SA 4.0). SSIMeetup.org
51. Why a rubric
► Defining “decentralized” intractable
► How decentralized MUST a method be?
► And yet… there are commonalities
► A Rubric offers a way forward
► Method of evaluation (from education)
► Multi-dimensional
► Tailored to specific goals
This presentation is released under a Creative Commons license. (CC BY-SA 4.0). SSIMeetup.org
52. Our approach
► Limited to “decentralization”
► Capture the motivations of DID community
► Not exhaustive
► pick what matters
► NOT an authority for evaluations
► Make it easy for others to evaluate &
compare
This presentation is released under a Creative Commons license. (CC BY-SA 4.0). SSIMeetup.org
53. Intentions
► A tool for evaluating DID Methods
► Objective & non-judgmental
► Minimize bias. Avoid advocacy. Champion
characterization.
► Evaluation is in the eye of the beholder
► Weighting / Selection of criteria based on use case
under evaluation
► Evaluations / Responses up to evaluator
► No summary rating. No universal metric.
This presentation is released under a Creative Commons license. (CC BY-SA 4.0). SSIMeetup.org
54. This presentation is released under a Creative Commons license. (CC BY-SA 4.0). SSIMeetup.org
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rYdWiwawWmLOWtHRvT0GzYcdewW_OS9M2mAkENLFdt
Y/
55. This presentation is released under a Creative Commons license. (CC BY-SA 4.0). SSIMeetup.org
56. Why Use Cases & Requirements?
► Focus our work
► Keep us from rat-holing on irrelevant discussions
► Avoid spending time designing features no one needs
► Convince ourselves we are covering what we need
► Make sure we aren’t missing anything
► Communicate to others the value of our work
► So developers can understand where we are coming from
► So non-techies can understand what DIDs can do for them
This presentation is released under a Creative Commons license. (CC BY-SA 4.0). SSIMeetup.org
57. Brief Use Cases
1. Online Shopper
2. Vehicle Assemblies
3. Encrypted Data Vault
4. Accessing service endpoints
5. Verifiable Credentials
This presentation is released under a Creative Commons license. (CC BY-SA 4.0). SSIMeetup.org
58. How to Help: Brief Use Cases
► Write a one paragraph description of a single use case
► One value-creating interaction
► Not a category
► Not a list
► Be specific
► “Real” Person – Name, role/background, accessible, clear motivation
► Real task – A specific thing they do, perhaps triggered by a specific
event
► Describe what they do
► Not why
► Not how – avoid solution language
► “Just the facts, Ma’am”
► Be distinct – cover a feature and situation not already covered
This presentation is released under a Creative Commons license. (CC BY-SA 4.0). SSIMeetup.org
59. This presentation is released under a Creative Commons license. (CC BY-SA 4.0). SSIMeetup.org
60. This presentation is released under a Creative Commons license. (CC BY-SA 4.0). SSIMeetup.org
Christopher Allen "Self-Sovereign Identity: Why We Are Here"
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WoHIA5MzC-kKdyS3XVp5qT-ZiNUbpqXH59g3Q9Fnk04/
Brent Zundel "Anonymous Credentials"
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1hGEpWIpl9hp8QoTIXjlozY7Gzy6zXY9lAL2x6U1b7Fk/
61. This presentation is released under a Creative Commons license. (CC BY-SA 4.0). SSIMeetup.org
62.
63. This presentation is released under a Creative Commons license. (CC BY-SA 4.0). SSIMeetup.org
64. Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs)
fundamentals
IdentityBook.info special
twitter.com/IdentityBookHQ
SSIMeetup.orghttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Drummond Reed
W3C DID specification
co-author
Chief Trust Officer Evernym
Markus Sabadello
W3C DID specification
co-author
Founder Danube Tech