A presentation on the air quality issues associated with the Rosemont Copper project area developed by Applied Environmental Consulting. This presentation was given to the Forest Service and their contractors during technical transfer meetings in November 2008.
1. AIR QUALITY ISSUES
AFFECTING
ROSEMONT COPPER COMPANY
Prepared By:
Applied Environmental Consultants,
Inc. (AEC)
2. AEC RESPONSIBILITIES
§ Conduct Background Particulate and
Meteorological Monitoring
§ Develop the Relevant Information and Conduct
the Air Impact Analyses to Demonstrate that the
Facility Complies with Environmental Air Quality
Requirements
§ Prepare Application for an Air Quality Permit,
Interface with Appropriate Agencies to Address
Air Quality Related Issues
6. 2006 Wind Rose (April 1 – Dec. 31)
WIND ROSE PLOT: DISPLAY:
Rosemont Met Site Wind Speed
April 1, 2006 to december 31, 2006 Direction (blowing from)
NORTH
20%
16%
12%
8%
4%
WEST EAST
WIND SPEED
(m/s)
>= 10.1
8.5 - 10.1
7.0 - 8.5
5.5 - 7.0
3.9 - 5.5
SOUTH
2.4 - 3.9
1.9 - 2.4
1.4 - 1.9
1.0 - 1.4
Calms: 1.57%
STATION NAME:
Rosemont Project
CALM WINDS: TOTAL COUNT:
1.57% 6371 hrs.
AVG. WIND SPEED:
2.73 m/s
WRPLOT View - Lakes Environmental Software
7. 2007 Wind Rose (Jan. 1 – Dec. 31)
WIND ROSE PLOT: DISPLAY:
Rosemont Met Site Wind Speed
April 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006 Direction (blowing from)
NORTH
20%
16%
12%
8%
4%
WEST EAST
WIND SPEED
(m/s)
>= 10.1
8.5 - 10.1
7.0 - 8.5
5.5 - 7.0
3.9 - 5.5
SOUTH
2.4 - 3.9
1.9 - 2.4
1.4 - 1.9
1.0 - 1.4
Calms: 1.97%
STATION NAME:
Rosemont Project
CALM WINDS: TOTAL COUNT:
1.97% 7707 hrs.
AVG. WIND SPEED:
2.77 m/s
WRPLOT View - Lakes Environmental Software
8. AIR IMPACT ANALYSES
AFFECTED AGENCIES
§ PIMA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY (PCDEQ)
- Processes Application for an Air Quality
Permit and Issues Permit
§ FOREST SERVICE
- Verifies Compliance with Non-Permit Issues,
i.e. Protection of Air Quality Related Values
9. CONTENT OF PCDEQ APPICATION
§ Description of Processes and Operations
§ Identification of All Emission Units
§ Identification of Maximum Process Rates and
Pollution Controls
§ Development of Maximum Hourly, Daily, Annual
Emission Inventories
§ Air Impact Analysis Demonstrating Protection of
Applicable Standards
§ Demonstration of Compliance with Applicable
Emission Standards.
12. Example Process Flow Diagram
w
Hopper /
Apron Feeder w
Scrubber
Legend
Primary
i
Crusher Control device i
i
Controlled by device i
UG
UG Underground
Surge
UG Bin w Water Sprays
w
Process Flow
Apron
Air Flow
w Conveyor Feeder
Water Flow
w
Conveyor
w
Stacker
Scrubber
Stockpiles
Wet
Process
1 1
Conveyor Secondary
1 Secondary Grinding Mill
Crusher
Vibrating Feeders Oversize Hydrocyclone
Water Set
Conveyor Water
Wet Wet
Process Process
Sump Pump
Primary Vibrating
Grinding Mill Screen
To Floatation
13. EMISSION INVENTORIES
• Permits Are Issued Based on Max Emmis.
• Use Max. Process Rates (tph, tpy, hp, etc.)
• Select Representative Emission Factors or
Rates (All Assumptions Must Be Substantiated)
– Regulatory Limits
– Manufacturer s Specifications
– Mass Balance
– Computerized EPA Software (TANKS)
– Emission Factors (EPA s AP-42)
• Select Representative Control Efficiencies &
Calculate Emissions
14. AIR IMPACT ANALYSES
§ Demonstrate Protection of Applicable Standards Starting
at Process Area Boundary; Visibility at Class I Areas
§ Averaging Times of 1-hour, 8-hour, 24-hour, Annual
§ EPA Models
– SCREEN
– AERMOD
– VISCREEN
– PLUVUE
– CALPUFF
§ Meteorological Data Requirements: 1-5 years
§ Concurrent Upper Air Meteorological Data - NWS
§ Modeling Protocol
15. CURRENT STATUS
§ Continuation of Ambient Monitoring
Programs
§ Developing Templates for Emission
Inventories
§ Will Commence on Final Analyses Upon
Completion of Final Mine Plan
Specifications