6. § To understand how Swedish companies work with innovation with the
purpose to help organizations better understand various aspects of
innovation capabilities, strategies and execution.
§ The aim is to highlight the biggest success factors and pitfalls to give
organizations hands on tips in how to improve their innovation
capabilities.
PURPOSE WITH THE STUDY
7. ABOUT THE STUDY
0,00%
10,00%
20,00%
30,00%
40,00%
50,00%
0-‐50
51-‐500
500+
How
many
employees
does
your
company
have?
0,00%
10,00%
20,00%
30,00%
40,00%
50,00%
0-‐100
101-‐1000
1000+
What
is
your
company's
annual
revenue
in
millions
SEK?
Responses: 101 Swedish companies
10. INNOVATION IS A BIG
DEAL FOR SWEDISH
COMPANIES
More than 70% of the
companies says that
innovation will become
more important in the
upcoming years.
60% state that
innovation has been
crucial factor in terms
of its business success
12. 40% OF THE COMPANIES
HAVE AGGRESIVE
GROWTH AMBITIONS
OVER THE NEXT YEARS
13.
14. ONE THIRD OF THE
COMPANIES ARE STATING
THAT 11-20% OF FUTURE
REVENUE WILL COME
FROM INNOVATIONS.
12% of the companies are
expecting that more than
50% of revenue will
originate from innovations.
15. 60% HAVE AN
HISTORIC INNOVATION
SUCCESS RATE THAT
IS AS EXPECTED
20% experience
success rates higher
than expected.
16. IN 2000 ONLY 15% OF ITS
INNOVATION EFFORTS MET
PROFIT AND REVENUE
TARGETS. TODAY THE
FIGURE IS 50%.
17. 70% OF THE PARTICIPANTS
VIEW THEMSELVES AS
BETTER ON INNOVATION
THAN THEIR PEERS.
18. ONLY ABOUT 10% OF THE
COMPANIES USES
STRUCTURED PROCESS IN
THEIR INNOVATION EFFORTS
20. 0
1
2
3
4
5
Systema3c
process
to
generate
ideas
Systema3c
process
to
priori3ze
ideas
Management
focus
Knowledge
Organiza3onal
culture
Financial
funding
Ability
to
bring
ideas
to
the
market
Alloca3on
of
responsibili3es
Ability
to
measure
Time
Elements
of
innova<on
execu<on
21. HUBRIS?
”ON THE SURFACE, IT'S NOT A BIG
PROBLEM THAT WE TEND TO
OVERESTIMATE OUR OWN ABILITIES.
HOWEVER, WHEN WE'RE BLISSFULLY
IGNORANT OF OUR SKILLS, WE CAN'T
WORK TOWARD IMPROVING THEM.”
22. 0
1
2
3
4
5
Systema3c
proccess
to
generate
ideas
Systema3c
proccess
to
priori3ze
ideas
Ability
to
bring
ideas
Alloca3on
of
responsibili3es
Culture
Financial
Fund
Ability
to
measure
Company
Revenues
and
Execu<on
Elements
< 100 million SEK
> 100 million SEK
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SMALL AND LARGE
ORGANISATIONS
23. SUMMARY
§ The companies in the study seem to be highly innovative and
expecting innovations to be a great part of future revenue.
§ But on the same time they handle innovation as an informal
process without any tools, processes and structures in place.
31. 0
1
2
3
4
5
Innova3on
pioneers
Innova3on
laggards
Our
company
has
a
brand
strategy
that
is
clearly
defined
in
how
we
create
differen<a<ng
value
for
our
customers.
32. SUMMARY – INNOVATION PIONEERS
§ Use their brand to drive innovation.
§ Have higher management focus.
§ Know how to measure efforts and results.
§ Have processes to be more effective with the time they have.
34. WHAT CAUSE ONE IDEA TO TAKE ROOT WHILE
ANOTHER IDEA IS ABANDONED?
§ Only in storybooks do inventions comes like thunderbolt
§ Innovation = an idea transformed into customer value
§ Research repeatedly shows that coming up with breakthrough ideas is
the easy part
§ The hard part is turning ideas into advances that are practical to
implement – practical not only technically, but also commercially
§ Research repeatedly shows that what makes the difference between an
idea and an innovation, is the ecosystem or the lack of it.
You sit under a tree, an apple falls
on your head, et voilà, you discover
gravity.